Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Concentrations of Heavy Metals in Processed Baby Foods and Infant Formulas Worldwide: A Scoping Review

Source

Summary This scoping review synthesizes global evidence for Pb, Cd, arsenic, and mercury concentrations in processed baby foods and infant formulas.

Page snapshot
Cited by49 pages
Metals measured4
Evidence tierA
Year2025

Summary

This scoping review synthesizes global evidence for Pb, Cd, arsenic, and mercury concentrations in processed baby foods and infant formulas. It is useful for Category 1 as an evidence map and prioritization source, but primary-study values should be preferred for final p-value aggregation where available.

Key numbers

  • The review included 75 studies covering 580 baby foods and 251 infant formulas.
  • Pb, Cd, and As were detected in more than 60 percent of baby foods.
  • For baby foods, the highest Pb median was reported in rice mixes and fish mixes, 0.008 mg/kg each.
  • For baby foods, the highest Cd median was reported in cereals, 0.013 mg/kg, and mixed foods, 0.008 mg/kg.
  • For baby foods, the highest As median was reported in mixed fish, 0.165 mg/kg, and rice mixes, 0.048 mg/kg.
  • For infant formulas, Pb, Cd, and As were detected in more than 60 percent of items.
  • For infant formulas, the highest Pb median concentrations were in stages 1 and 2, 0.015 mg/kg each.
  • For infant formulas, without-stage formulas had the highest As median, 0.052 mg/kg.
  • Across baby food items, the review reports detection in 69 percent for Pb, 72 percent for Cd, 73 percent for As, and 34 percent for Hg.
  • Across infant formula items, the review reports detection in 74 percent for Pb, 61 percent for Cd, 63 percent for As, and 42 percent for Hg.
  • By primary protein source, Pb was detected in 73 percent of cow-based formula items and 84 percent of soy-based formula items; Cd was detected in 44 percent of cow-based formula items and 91 percent of soy-based formula items.

Review-level concentration rows

These are secondary-review medians and exceedance summaries. They are useful for prioritization and gap analysis, but should not be pooled with primary-study product rows for HMTc p90/p100 calculations.

Evidence itemProduct fitMetalReview statisticApproximate ppb equivalentUse note
Rice/rice-mix baby foodsBaby Cereals / Grain Products, Dry (Rice-Based), Mixed Meals, Rice-Containing, Teething & Snacks (Rice-Based)Pbmedian 0.008 mg/kg; 31% of detected items exceeded the Pb ML used by the authors8 ppbBroad rice/rice-mix group, not row-specific.
Rice/rice-mix baby foodsBaby Cereals / Grain Products, Dry (Rice-Based), Mixed Meals, Rice-Containing, Teething & Snacks (Rice-Based)Asmedian 0.048 mg/kg; 30% of detected items exceeded the As ML used by the authors48 ppbReview reports As; speciation varies across included studies.
Fish/fish-mix baby foodsFish-Containing Baby FoodsAsmedian 0.165 mg/kg; 89% of detected items exceeded the As ML used by the authors165 ppbBroad fish/fish-mix group; arsenic species not resolved.
Fish/fish-mix baby foodsFish-Containing Baby FoodsHgmedian 0.016 mg/kg; Hg detected in all fish/fish-mix determinations in the review grouping16 ppbMercury species not guaranteed across included studies.
Cereal baby foodsBaby Cereals / Grain Products, Dry (Non-Rice), Baby Cereals / Grain Products, Dry (Rice-Based)Cdmedian 0.013 mg/kg; 17% of detected cereal items exceeded the Cd ML used by the authors13 ppbBroad cereal group; rice/non-rice split not resolved.
Mixed foods excluding meat/fish/riceMixed Meals, Non-RiceCdmedian 0.008 mg/kg; 19% of detected mixed-food items exceeded the Cd ML used by the authors8 ppbBroad non-rice mixed-food context, not a product-specific distribution.
Roots and tubersRoot-Vegetable PureesPbdetection in 97% of evaluated roots/tubers; median 0.007 mg/kg7 ppbBroad roots/tubers group; not puree-specific.
Infant formulas by stageInfant Formula, Powder (Non-Soy), Infant Formula, Powder (Soy-Based), Infant Formula, RTF Liquid (Non-Soy), Infant Formula, RTF Liquid (Soy-Based)Pbstage 1 and stage 2 medians each 0.015 mg/kg; 60% of detected stage 1 and 72% of detected stage 2 items exceeded the Pb ML used by the authors15 ppbStage-level formula context; not powder/RTF-specific.
Infant formulas by protein sourceInfant Formula, Powder (Non-Soy), Infant Formula, RTF Liquid (Non-Soy)Pbcow-based formula median 0.005 mg/kg; 34% of detected cow-based items exceeded the Pb ML used by the authors5 ppbProtein-source context; no format split.
Infant formulas by protein sourceInfant Formula, Powder (Soy-Based), Infant Formula, RTF Liquid (Soy-Based)CdCd detected in 91% of soy-based formula determinations; soy-based median 0.001 mg/kg1 ppbProtein-source context; no format split.
Infant formulas without stageformula bridge contextAsmedian 0.052 mg/kg; 71% of detected without-stage formula items exceeded the As ML used by the authors52 ppbUseful retrieval target for underlying primary sources, not direct row math.

Health-risk review findings

The review identified 41 studies that conducted infant health-risk assessments; 15 reported risks associated with intake of baby foods or infant formulas. Risk findings clustered around rice products for infants 6 months and older, especially for As and Cd, and around stage 1 and 2 formulas for infants under 12 months, especially for As, Pb, and Cd.

Methods (brief)

The review followed JBI scoping-review methods and PRISMA-ScR reporting. Baby foods were classified into seven primary-ingredient groups, and infant formulas were classified by stage and specialty status.

Limitations

This is a secondary synthesis under a CC BY-NC-ND license. It is useful for coverage mapping and identifying primary studies, but the standards pipeline should avoid double-counting review medians alongside the primary datasets they summarize. Several classifications are broad, including rice/rice-mix, fish/fish-mix, cereals, stage formulas, and primary protein source; these categories do not map one-to-one to the locked HMTc rows.

Implications

Certification: Useful as a global evidence map and citation trail for Category 1, not as a substitute for primary concentration rows.

Courses: Useful overview of why rice, fish, cereals, mixed foods, and formula require different treatment.

App: Useful for retrieval ranking and identifying missing primary-study targets.

Microbiome: No direct microbiome endpoint.

Wiki pages updated on ingest

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
a8052bb2026-08-09major9 sections added; narrative text revised