Cadmium is the metal to check in cocoa: it rises with cocoa content, is highest in cocoa powder and dark chocolate, and is lowest in beans from West Africa; lead comes mainly from handling after harvest.1Cadmium and Lead in Cocoa Powder and Chocolate Products in the U.S. MarketFood Additives & Contaminants: Part B SurveillanceRead source →2Surveillance of Cadmium Concentration in Chocolate and Cocoa Powder Products Distributed in JapanFood Hygiene and Safety ScienceRead source →3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →
-
Metals of concern:
Cadmium decides most cocoa questions; lead, nickel and aluminium are also elevated, while arsenic and mercury are usually low.1Cadmium and Lead in Cocoa Powder and Chocolate Products in the U.S. MarketFood Additives & Contaminants: Part B SurveillanceRead source →4Scientific Opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of nickel in food and drinking waterEFSA Journal 2015;13(2):4002, 202 pp.Read source →5GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
-
Main drivers:
Growing origin, soil cadmium and pH, and cocoa content for cadmium; shell, dust and handling for lead.2Surveillance of Cadmium Concentration in Chocolate and Cocoa Powder Products Distributed in JapanFood Hygiene and Safety ScienceRead source →3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →6Drivers of cadmium accumulation in Theobroma cacao L. beans: A quantitative synthesis of soil-plant relationships across the Cacao BeltPLOS ONERead source →
-
Practical framing:
Ask for lot cadmium results with the cocoa-solids content, and cleaning and shelling controls for lead.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →7Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 of 25 April 2023 on maximum levels for certain contaminants in food and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006Official Journal of the European UnionRead source →
Cocoa overview
Cadmium is the metal that sets cocoa apart, and it travels with the cocoa solids. In the US retail survey by Abt and colleagues, mean cadmium was 700 µg/kg in cocoa powder, 270 µg/kg in dark chocolate and 60 µg/kg in milk chocolate.1Cadmium and Lead in Cocoa Powder and Chocolate Products in the U.S. MarketFood Additives & Contaminants: Part B SurveillanceRead source → In Japan, the median rose from 23 µg/kg in chocolate under 50% cocoa to 250 µg/kg at 80% or more.2Surveillance of Cadmium Concentration in Chocolate and Cocoa Powder Products Distributed in JapanFood Hygiene and Safety ScienceRead source → Lead, by contrast, is usually lower and is driven more by what happens to the bean after harvest than by where it grew.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →8Perspective on Cadmium and Lead in Cocoa and ChocolateJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistryRead source →
Growing origin is the strongest supported lever for cadmium. In industry bean testing compiled for a California settlement, median bean cadmium was 55–94 µg/kg for Nigeria, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Cameroon and Brazil, against 511 µg/kg for Ecuador, 542 µg/kg for Peru and 892 µg/kg for Venezuela.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source → The international cadmium assessment found the same pattern in cocoa powder, with a mean of 141 µg/kg in the mainly African cluster and 1,601 µg/kg in the mainly South and Central American cluster.9Cadmium: dietary exposure assessmentWHO Food Additives Series, No. 82 (Safety evaluation of certain contaminants in food, prepared by the 91st meeting of JECFA)Read source → The low-cadmium origins are not lower in lead, so origin choice addresses one metal, not both.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →10Cd and Pb in cocoa beans: Occurrence and effects of chocolate processingFood Control 119, 107455Read source →
For a buyer, the supported priorities are lot results for cadmium with the cocoa-solids content stated, and cleaning and shelling controls for lead.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →7Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 of 25 April 2023 on maximum levels for certain contaminants in food and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006Official Journal of the European UnionRead source → The EU limits cadmium at 0.10 to 0.80 mg/kg in chocolate according to cocoa content and at 0.60 mg/kg in cocoa powder, and the Codex Alimentarius standard sets 0.3 to 0.9 mg/kg for chocolate and 2.0 mg/kg for cocoa powder.7Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 of 25 April 2023 on maximum levels for certain contaminants in food and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006Official Journal of the European UnionRead source →11General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed (CXS 193-1995)Codex Alimentarius (Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme)Read source → Chocolate supplied about 4% of dietary cadmium across European age groups and close to 10%, with other cocoa products, for school-age children; JECFA judged cocoa a minor contributor overall.12Cadmium dietary exposure in the European populationEFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2551Read source →9Cadmium: dietary exposure assessmentWHO Food Additives Series, No. 82 (Safety evaluation of certain contaminants in food, prepared by the 91st meeting of JECFA)Read source →
What counts as cocoa
Cocoa comes from the seeds of Theobroma cacao, which are fermented, dried, cleaned and roasted, then separated into shell and nib.10Cd and Pb in cocoa beans: Occurrence and effects of chocolate processingFood Control 119, 107455Read source →13Code of Practice for the Prevention and Reduction of Cadmium Contamination in Cocoa Beans (CXC 81-2022)FAO and WHO, 2023. Codex Alimentarius Code of Practice No. CXC 81-2022. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme. Rome.Read source → Ground nibs form cocoa liquor, which is pressed into cocoa butter and a cake milled into cocoa powder; chocolate combines liquor, butter, sugar and, in milk chocolate, milk solids.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →10Cd and Pb in cocoa beans: Occurrence and effects of chocolate processingFood Control 119, 107455Read source →
These fractions behave differently for metals, so this page keeps them apart. In a pilot run on Bahia beans, cadmium was 60 µg/kg in the liquor and 111 µg/kg in the powder, while the cocoa butter was below the 1.5 µg/kg quantification limit.10Cd and Pb in cocoa beans: Occurrence and effects of chocolate processingFood Control 119, 107455Read source → Bean shells carry much of the lead: in industry testing the median shell lead was 341 µg/kg against 1.2 µg/kg in the separated nibs.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →
The page covers beans and nibs, liquor, butter, natural and alkalised cocoa powder, sweetened drinking-chocolate powder sold as powder, and dark, milk and white chocolate. Foods that only contain cocoa, such as chocolate milk, cakes, cereals, spreads and filled or coated confectionery, are outside its scope, as is cocoa butter used as a skin-protectant drug.5GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →14FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →15Over-the-Counter (OTC) Monograph M016: Skin Protectant Drug Products for Over-the-Counter Human Use (Posted September 24, 2021)U.S. Food and Drug Administration, OTC Monograph M016, Final Administrative Order OTC000005Read source → Beans are usually reported on a dry-weight basis and products as sold, and the two are not converted into each other.1Cadmium and Lead in Cocoa Powder and Chocolate Products in the U.S. MarketFood Additives & Contaminants: Part B SurveillanceRead source →16Heavy metal accumulation in leaves and beans of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) in major cacao growing regions in PeruScience of the Total EnvironmentRead source →
Heavy metal contamination profile of cocoa
The table holds every cocoa and chocolate result extracted from 40 survey, farm, total diet, monitoring and assessment sources: one row for each statistic a source reports for a subgroup, form and metal.1Cadmium and Lead in Cocoa Powder and Chocolate Products in the U.S. MarketFood Additives & Contaminants: Part B SurveillanceRead source →3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →5GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →14FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →9Cadmium: dietary exposure assessmentWHO Food Additives Series, No. 82 (Safety evaluation of certain contaminants in food, prepared by the 91st meeting of JECFA)Read source → Ratings place a mean, median or single result against a pooled reference for the same cocoa form, built from WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians, individual products and batches, and published subgroup medians; non-detects remain intervals and are never read as zero.1Cadmium and Lead in Cocoa Powder and Chocolate Products in the U.S. MarketFood Additives & Contaminants: Part B SurveillanceRead source →2Surveillance of Cadmium Concentration in Chocolate and Cocoa Powder Products Distributed in JapanFood Hygiene and Safety ScienceRead source →5GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →17Results of the BfR MEAL Study: In Germany, mercury is mostly contained in fish and seafood while cadmium, lead, and nickel are present in a broad spectrum of foodsFood Chemistry: XRead source → Rows that failed a check against their own paper stay visible with the reason and are not compared.18Determination of Heavy Metals in Locally Available Chocolates in Lahore RegionTurkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and TechnologyRead source →19Levels of heavy metals concentrations in chocolates from Bwari market Abuja FCT, NigeriaInternational Journal of Adulteration9:e2ijad3057Read source →20Content and the relationship between cadmium, nickel, and lead concentrations in Ecuadorian cocoa beans from nine provincesFood ControlRead source →
Cadmium and lead dominate the evidence; nickel, total arsenic, mercury, chromium, aluminium and tin are reported by fewer sources.4Scientific Opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of nickel in food and drinking waterEFSA Journal 2015;13(2):4002, 202 pp.Read source →5GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →17Results of the BfR MEAL Study: In Germany, mercury is mostly contained in fish and seafood while cadmium, lead, and nickel are present in a broad spectrum of foodsFood Chemistry: XRead source → Nickel is high in cocoa compared with most foods: European monitoring averaged about 9,500 µg/kg in cocoa beans and products and 3,800 µg/kg in chocolate, and a German cocoa powder pool held 11,050 µg/kg.4Scientific Opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of nickel in food and drinking waterEFSA Journal 2015;13(2):4002, 202 pp.Read source →17Results of the BfR MEAL Study: In Germany, mercury is mostly contained in fish and seafood while cadmium, lead, and nickel are present in a broad spectrum of foodsFood Chemistry: XRead source → Arsenic results are almost all totals, and nearly every European inorganic-arsenic result for chocolate and cocoa powder was below a limit of about 20 µg/kg.5GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Comparison methods and scope
Each row is one statistic a source reports for one subgroup, cocoa form and metal. Percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Ratings place a reported mean, median or single result against a pooled HMI reference for the same form (beans and nibs, liquor, butter, powder, sweetened powder, and each chocolate type), built from every compatible sampling family. Same-study contrasts compare a subgroup with its own study total for that form. Held rows failed a check against their own paper and are shown but not compared.
First displayed analyte: Cadmium: 1071 findings from 31 sources. Each row retains its statistic and measurement basis.
Filter findings
1912 of 1912 findings · 11 analytes
About this table
| Food form | Collection scope | Finding (µg/kg) | Comparison | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
238 findings · 15 studies · 65 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Cocoa beans and nibsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region AFRO; random sampling2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2003–2019Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2007Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; targeted sampling2013–2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2004–2019Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; random sampling2002–2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2012Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Amazonas2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Blanco Piurano2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Cajamarca2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | CCN512014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | CCN51/ICS952014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | CCN51/ICS95/ICS392014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Chuncho2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Cuzco2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Huanuco2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Junin2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Native from Maranon2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Native from Satipo2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Piura2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | regional means, 8 departments2014Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | San Martin2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Spontaneous Hybrids2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Tumbes2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Arguello 2019 Ecuador2014–2020Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 76.5 µg/kg; Q3 159 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 60 µg/kg; Q3 119 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Colombia2014–2020Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Columbia2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 819 µg/kg; Q3 3,875 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Columbia2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Columbia2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Columbia2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 187 µg/kg; Q3 303 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 410 µg/kg; Q3 727 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 60 µg/kg; Q3 89.3 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Haiti2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Haiti2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Honduras2014–2020Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 280 µg/kg; Q3 470 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 55 µg/kg; Q3 70 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | LAC marine-shale / high Cd:Zn2014–2020Bean basis as reported | max. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Lewis 2018 Trinidad genebank2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Nigeria2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 40 µg/kg; Q3 89.5 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Nigeria2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Nigeria2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Nigeria2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 434 µg/kg; Q3 682 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2014–2020Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2014–2020Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Philippines2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Philippines2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Philippines2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Philippines2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | range of country means2014–2020Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Santander2014–2020Bean basis as reported | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Sao Tome2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 64 µg/kg; Q3 85 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Sao Tome2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Sao Tome2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Sao Tome2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Tanzania2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Tanzania2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Tanzania2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Tanzania2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Trinidad2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 345 µg/kg; Q3 552 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Trinidad2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Trinidad2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Trinidad2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Trinidad2014–2020Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Trinidad2014–2020Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Venezuela2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 468 µg/kg; Q3 1,245 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Venezuela2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Venezuela2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Venezuela2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Venezuela2014–2020Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Vietnam2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Vietnam2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBarraza et al. 2019 | A-1, Nacional hybrid cacaoCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBarraza et al. 2019 | A-2, CCN-51 hybrid cacaoCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBarraza et al. 2019 | all four bean samplesCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBarraza et al. 2019 | B, Nacional cacaoCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBarraza et al. 2019 | C-a + C-b mixed, Nacional cacaoCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBlommaert et al. 2022 | immature2020Bean basis as reported | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBlommaert et al. 2022 | intermediate2020Bean basis as reported | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBlommaert et al. 2022 | mature2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBlommaert et al. 2022 | NA 312 high-Cd cultivar, all pods2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBlommaert et al. 2022 | NA 312 high-Cd cultivar2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBravo et al. 2024 | all farms, AraucaCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 320–1,190 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBravo et al. 2024 | all farms, AraucaCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBravo et al. 2024 | ArauquitaCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBravo et al. 2024 | FortulCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBravo et al. 2024 | SaravenaCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBravo et al. 2024 | TameCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBurgon 2023 | cocoa beans, all regions2020–2022Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: up to 890 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBurgon 2023 | cocoa beans, all regions2020–2022Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBurgon 2023 | cocoa beans, Amazonas2020–2022Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 520–890 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBurgon 2023 | cocoa beans, Amazonas2020–2022Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBurgon 2023 | cocoa beans, Bahia2020–2022Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: up to 160 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBurgon 2023 | cocoa beans, Bahia2020–2022Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBurgon 2023 | cocoa beans, Espírito Santo2020–2022Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: up to 440 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBurgon 2023 | cocoa beans, Espírito Santo2020–2022Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBurgon 2023 | cocoa beans, Pará2020–2022Bean basis as reported | below LOD. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 320–1,440 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsEileen et al. 2020 | AsiaCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsEileen et al. 2020 | Latin America2015–2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Africa/CICollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Africa/CICollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Brazil/BACollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Brazil/BACollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Brazil/ESCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 124–158 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Brazil/ESCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Brazil/PACollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 38–819 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Brazil/PACollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Brazil/ROCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 52–76 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Brazil/ROCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Ecuador/EQCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 721–1,590 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Ecuador/EQCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | pilot processing batch: startingCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsJECFA 2022 | G032011Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 155 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsJECFA 2022 | G032011Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsJECFA 2022 | G032011Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsJECFA 2022 | G062011Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsJECFA 2022 | G062011Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsJECFA 2022 | G082011Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsJECFA 2022 | G082011Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsJECFA 2022 | Global2011Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 1,151 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsJECFA 2022 | Global2011Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsJECFA 2022 | Global2011Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsJECFA 2022 | WHO European Region2011Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 1,427 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsJECFA 2022 | WHO European Region2011Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsJECFA 2022 | WHO European Region2011Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRamtahal et al. 2016 | all sampled plantationsCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | All nine provincesCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | All nine provincesCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | AzuayCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 550–620 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | AzuayCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | AzuayCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 190–1,930 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | AzuayCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | AzuayCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 440–1,700 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | AzuayCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | BolívarCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 630–760 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | BolívarCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | BolívarCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 250–1,150 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | BolívarCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | BolívarCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 150–840 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | BolívarCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | El OroCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 390–500 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | El OroCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | El OroCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 220–3,950 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | El OroCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | El OroCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 470–4,080 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | El OroCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | EsmeraldasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 1,070–1,460 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | EsmeraldasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | EsmeraldasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | EsmeraldasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 130–3,100 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | EsmeraldasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | EsmeraldasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 300–1,960 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | EsmeraldasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | GuayasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | GuayasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | GuayasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | GuayasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 210–3,920 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | GuayasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | GuayasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 240–3,570 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | GuayasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | Los RíosCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 780–1,000 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | Los RíosCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | Los RíosCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | Los RíosCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 160–1,520 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | Los RíosCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | Los RíosCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 230–1,230 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | Los RíosCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | ManabíCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 420–560 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | ManabíCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | ManabíCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 70–3,590 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | ManabíCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | ManabíCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 230–3,460 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | ManabíCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | NapoCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 240–300 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | NapoCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | NapoCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | NapoCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 100–3,450 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | NapoCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | NapoCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 200–2,180 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | NapoCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | Santo Domingo de los TsáchilasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 350–464 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | Santo Domingo de los TsáchilasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | Santo Domingo de los TsáchilasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 70–370 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | Santo Domingo de los TsáchilasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | Santo Domingo de los TsáchilasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 380–1,260 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | Santo Domingo de los TsáchilasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsThomas et al. 2023 | La Quemazon, Piura2018–2019Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsThomas et al. 2023 | Las Lomas, Piura2018–2019Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsVineta et al. 2016 | CameroonCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsVineta et al. 2016 | EcuadorCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsVineta et al. 2016 | GhanaCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsVineta et al. 2016 | NigeriaCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
65 findings · 4 studies | ||||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Haiti2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Haiti2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Philippines2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Philippines2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Philippines2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Philippines2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Vietnam2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Vietnam2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellBlommaert et al. 2022 | intermediate2020Bean basis as reported | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellBlommaert et al. 2022 | mature2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellBlommaert et al. 2022 | NA 312 high-Cd cultivar, all pods2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellFerreira et al. 2021 | pilot processing batch: shellCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellRamtahal et al. 2016 | all sampled plantationsCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
80 findings · 5 studies · 42 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)WHO GEMS/Food | WHO region AFRO; random sampling2016 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)WHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2004–2017 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)WHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; targeted sampling2004–2016 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)WHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)WHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; random sampling2013–2018 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)WHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; targeted sampling2019 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)WHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; unknown2015–2016 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)WHO GEMS/Food | WHO region SEARO2016 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)WHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2017 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Blended2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 96 µg/kg; Q3 273 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Blended2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Blended2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Blended2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 92.8 µg/kg; Q3 99.5 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 60 µg/kg; Q3 88.8 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 75 µg/kg; Q3 360 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 194 µg/kg; Q1 182 µg/kg; Q3 291 µg/kg; Q3 264 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 604 µg/kg; Q1 650 µg/kg; Q3 899 µg/kg; Q3 912 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 73.8 µg/kg; Q1 72 µg/kg; Q3 90.6 µg/kg; Q3 89 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Haiti2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 313 µg/kg; Q3 785 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Haiti2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Haiti2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Haiti2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Haiti2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Haiti2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Haiti2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Haiti2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 217 µg/kg; Q3 313 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 62.2 µg/kg; Q1 70 µg/kg; Q3 124 µg/kg; Q3 171 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Nigeria2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 63.5 µg/kg; Q3 84 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Nigeria2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Nigeria2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Nigeria2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 162 µg/kg; Q3 266 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | United States producing country2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Unknown2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 86 µg/kg; Q3 380 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Unknown2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Unknown2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Unknown2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)Barraza et al. 2019 | A-1, Nacional hybrid cacaoCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)Barraza et al. 2019 | A-2, CCN-51 hybrid cacaoCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)Ferreira et al. 2021 | pilot processing batch: liquorCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)JECFA 2022 | G032011 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 187 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)JECFA 2022 | G032011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)JECFA 2022 | G032011 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)JECFA 2022 | G052011 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 2,810 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)JECFA 2022 | G052011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)JECFA 2022 | G052011 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)JECFA 2022 | G062011 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)JECFA 2022 | G062011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)JECFA 2022 | G062011 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)JECFA 2022 | G072011 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)JECFA 2022 | G072011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)JECFA 2022 | G082011 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)JECFA 2022 | G082011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)JECFA 2022 | G092011 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)JECFA 2022 | G092011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)JECFA 2022 | Global2011 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 2,592 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)JECFA 2022 | Global2011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)JECFA 2022 | Global2011 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)JECFA 2022 | WHO European Region2011 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 1,000 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)JECFA 2022 | WHO European Region2011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)JECFA 2022 | WHO European Region2011 | percentile. | ||
25 findings · 4 studies · 1 spread figure folded in | ||||
| Cocoa butterWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EMRO; unknown2019 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2005–2016 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; targeted sampling2013–2016 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; random sampling2015–2017 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2017 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterFerreira et al. 2021 | pilot processing batch: cocoaCollection date unreported | below LOD. | ||
| Cocoa butterJECFA 2022 | G042011 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa butterJECFA 2022 | G042011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterJECFA 2022 | G072011 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa butterJECFA 2022 | G072011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterJECFA 2022 | G082011 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa butterJECFA 2022 | G082011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterJECFA 2022 | Global2011 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 73 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa butterJECFA 2022 | Global2011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterJECFA 2022 | Global2011 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa butterJECFA 2022 | WHO European Region2011 | below LOD. | ||
127 findings · 12 studies · 47 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region AFRO; random sampling2016 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region AFRO; unknown2004–2022 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; targeted sampling2003–2016 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; random sampling2009–2018 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; targeted sampling2019 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; unknown2006–2022 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region SEARO2016 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2005–2016 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; unknown2006 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderFDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | United States national collections2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderEFSA 2012 | Europe, all samples2003–2011 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderEFSA 2012 | Europe, all samples2003–2011 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderEFSA 2012 | Europe, all samples2003–2011 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Africa, Middle East, Asia2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 248 µg/kg; Q3 595 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Africa, Middle East, Asia2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Africa, Middle East, Asia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Africa, Middle East, Asia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 153 µg/kg; Q3 556 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All data2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 153 µg/kg; Q3 556 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All data2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All data2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All data2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All Regions2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 144 µg/kg; Q3 354 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All Regions2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All Regions2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All Regions2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Asia Pacific2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Asia Pacific2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Blended2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 367 µg/kg; Q3 550 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Blended2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Blended2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Blended2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 195 µg/kg; Q3 218 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Europe2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 129 µg/kg; Q3 197 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Europe2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Europe2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Europe2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Europe, Middle East, Africa2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | France2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 120 µg/kg; Q3 485 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | France2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | France2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | France2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Germany2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 126 µg/kg; Q3 152 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Germany2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Germany2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Germany2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 422 µg/kg; Q3 611 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 97.5 µg/kg; Q3 125 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Latin America2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Latin America2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 319 µg/kg; Q3 509 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | North America2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 95.5 µg/kg; Q3 400 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | North America2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | North America2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | North America2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | The Netherlands2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 138 µg/kg; Q3 319 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | The Netherlands2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | The Netherlands2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | The Netherlands2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 153 µg/kg; Q3 472 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Unknown2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 143 µg/kg; Q3 558 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Unknown2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Unknown2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Unknown2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderCantoral et al. 2024 | Cocoa Powder2022–2023 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2018 | 100% cocoa2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016 | mean.Same samples: 10–3,150 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016 | range. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2018 | origin not available or multiple2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | Africa2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | AsiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | Bahia, BrazilCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | EcuadorCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | El Oro, EcuadorCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | GhanaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | Habuna, BrazilCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | Ivory CoastCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | Latin America2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | MalaysiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | VenezuelaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | 20082008 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 570 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | 20082008 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | 20122012 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 290 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | 20122012 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Africa2008–2012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | African origins summarised2008–2012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | All samples2008–2012 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 530 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | All samples2008–2012 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | American origins summarised2008–2012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Austria2008–2012 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Bolivia2008–2012 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Côte d'Ivoire2008–2012 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Dominican Republic2008–2012 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | European origins summarised2008–2012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | France, incl. Corsica2008–2012 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Germany2008–2012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Grouping 1 Origin A2008–2012 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 140 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Grouping 1 Origin A2008–2012 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Grouping 1 Origin B2008–2012 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 768 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Grouping 1 Origin B2008–2012 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Grouping 2 Origin A2008–2012 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 130 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Grouping 2 Origin A2008–2012 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Grouping 2 Origin B2008–2012 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 680 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Grouping 2 Origin B2008–2012 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Indonesia2008–2012 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Italy2008–2012 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Not specified2008–2012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Peru2008–2012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Poland2008–2012 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Russian Federation2008–2012 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Spain2008–2012 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Switzerland2008–2012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | The Netherlands2008–2012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2022 | Cocoa powder, national pool2016–2019 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2022 | German Food Monitoring 20122012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFerreira et al. 2021 | pilot processing batch: cocoaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | All cocoa powder2011 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | G032011 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 191 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | G032011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | G032011 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | G032011 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | G052011 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | G052011 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 5,295 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | G052011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | G052011 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | G062011 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | G062011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | G072011 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | G072011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | G082011 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 1,510 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | G082011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | G082011 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | G092011 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | G092011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | G092011 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | G102011 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 1,258 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | G102011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | G102011 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | Global2011 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 3,740 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | Global2011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | Global2011 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | WHO European Region2011 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 754 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | WHO European Region2011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderJECFA 2022 | WHO European Region2011 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderKataoka et al. 2018 | Cocoa powder2015–2016 | mean.Same samples: 15–1,800 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa powderKataoka et al. 2018 | Cocoa powder2015–2016 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderKataoka et al. 2018 | Cocoa powder2015–2016 | range. | ||
13 findings · 4 studies | ||||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; targeted sampling2003–2005 | median. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2005–2017 | median. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; random sampling2004–2017 | median. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; targeted sampling2019 | median. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; unknown2016 | median. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2012–2016 | median. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderCantoral et al. 2024 | Chocolate Powder2022–2023 | sample value. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderElsheikh et al. 2020 | Brand 11Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderElsheikh et al. 2020 | Brand 12Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderElsheikh et al. 2020 | Brand 13Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderElsheikh et al. 2020 | Brand 14Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderFechner et al. 2022 | Cocoa beverage-preparation2016–2019 | sample value. | ||
75 findings · 12 studies · 6 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Dark chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Dark chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2005–2017 | median. | ||
| Dark chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; random sampling2011–2018 | median. | ||
| Dark chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; unknown2019–2028 | median. | ||
| Dark chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region SEARO2016 | median. | ||
| Dark chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2009–2013 | median. | ||
| Dark chocolateEFSA 2009 (cadmium) | EU Member States 2003-20072003–2007 | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEFSA 2012 | Europe, all samples2003–2011 | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEFSA 2012 | Europe, all samples2003–2011 | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEFSA 2012 | Europe, all samples2003–2011 | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEFSA 2012 | Europe, all samples2003–2011 | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEFSA 2012 | Europe, all samples2003–2011 | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEFSA 2012 | Europe, all samples2003–2011 | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateBravo et al. 2024 | 2023_C2Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Dark chocolateBravo et al. 2024 | 2023_C3Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Dark chocolateBravo et al. 2024 | 2023_C4Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Dark chocolateBravo et al. 2024 | 2023_C5Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Dark chocolateBravo et al. 2024 | 2023_C6Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Dark chocolateBravo et al. 2024 | 2023_C7Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Dark chocolateBravo et al. 2024 | all artisanal bars, AraucaCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 580–2,010 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Dark chocolateBravo et al. 2024 | all artisanal bars, AraucaCollection date unreported | range. | ||
| Dark chocolateBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar Amargo2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: 8–740 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Dark chocolateBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar Amargo2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Dark chocolateBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar Meio amargo2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: 4–100 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Dark chocolateBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar Meio amargo2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Dark chocolateBurgon 2023 | conventional Amargo2020–2022 | sample value. | ||
| Dark chocolateBurgon 2023 | conventional Meio amargo2020–2022 | sample value. | ||
| Dark chocolateCantoral et al. 2024 | Dark Chocolate Bars2022–2023 | sample value. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016 | mean.Same samples: 20–1,290 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016 | median. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016 | range. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2018 | origin not available or multiple2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | Africa2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | AsiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | BrazilCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | Central AmericaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | East AfricaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | Latin America2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | South AmericaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | West AfricaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Dark chocolateFechner et al. 2022 | Dark chocolate, national pool2016–2019 | sample value. | ||
| Dark chocolateFechner et al. 2022 | German Food Monitoring 20122012 | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateKataoka et al. 2018 | Dark chocolate2015–2016 | mean.Same samples: 25–2,300 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Dark chocolateKataoka et al. 2018 | Dark chocolate2015–2016 | median. | ||
| Dark chocolateKataoka et al. 2018 | Dark chocolate2015–2016 | range. | ||
| Dark chocolateMarincich et al. 2023 | Bitter chocolateCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: Percentile 149 µg/kg | ||
| Dark chocolateMarincich et al. 2023 | Bitter chocolateCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
30 findings · 12 studies · 7 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; random sampling2000–2019 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; unknown2012 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region SEARO2016 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2009–2014 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; targeted sampling1998–2008 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateFDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | United States national collections2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateEFSA 2009 (cadmium) | EU Member States 2003-20072003–2007 | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateEFSA 2012 | Europe, all samples2003–2011 | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateEFSA 2012 | Europe, all samples2003–2011 | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateEFSA 2012 | Europe, all samples2003–2011 | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 23rd ATDS | Australia, national food2008 | mean.Same samples: 17–100 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 23rd ATDS | Australia, national food2008 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 23rd ATDS | Australia, national food2008 | range. | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 25th ATDS | Australia, national food2013–2014 | mean.Same samples: 8–22 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 25th ATDS | Australia, national food2013–2014 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 25th ATDS | Australia, national food2013–2014 | range. | ||
| Milk chocolateBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar Ao leite2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: 9–94 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Milk chocolateBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar Ao leite2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Milk chocolateBurgon 2023 | conventional Ao leite2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: 10–120 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Milk chocolateBurgon 2023 | conventional Ao leite2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Milk chocolateEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016 | mean.Same samples: 4–310 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Milk chocolateEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016 | range. | ||
| Milk chocolateEileen et al. 2018 | origin not available or multiple2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | Africa2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | AsiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | BrazilCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | Latin America2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateFechner et al. 2022 | Milk chocolate, conventional pool2016–2019 | sample value. | ||
| Milk chocolateFechner et al. 2022 | Milk chocolate, organic pool2016–2019 | sample value. | ||
| Milk chocolateKataoka et al. 2018 | Milk chocolate2015–2016 | mean.Same samples: 12–310 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Milk chocolateKataoka et al. 2018 | Milk chocolate2015–2016 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateKataoka et al. 2018 | Milk chocolate2015–2016 | range. | ||
| Milk chocolateMarincich et al. 2023 | Milk chocolateCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: Percentile 29 µg/kg | ||
| Milk chocolateMarincich et al. 2023 | Milk chocolateCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
8 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| White chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2003–2019 | median. | ||
| White chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2005–2017 | median. | ||
| White chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; random sampling2012–2017 | median. | ||
| White chocolateBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar Branco2020–2022 | not detected. | ||
| White chocolateBurgon 2023 | conventional Branco2020–2022 | not detected. | ||
| White chocolateKataoka et al. 2018 | White chocolate2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| White chocolateKataoka et al. 2018 | White chocolate2015–2016 | median. | ||
| White chocolateKataoka et al. 2018 | White chocolate2015–2016 | range. | ||
128 findings · 10 studies · 41 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region AFRO; random sampling2016–2018 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EMRO; unknown2012–2019 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; targeted sampling2003–2006 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; random sampling2013–2019 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; targeted sampling2019 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; unknown2011–2020 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2010–2016 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2009 (cadmium) | EU Member States 2003-20072003–2007 | mean.Same samples: 5th percentile 3 µg/kg; 95th percentile 300 µg/kg; 470 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2009 (cadmium) | EU Member States 2003-20072003–2007 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2009 (cadmium) | EU Member States 2003-20072003–2007 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2009 (cadmium) | EU Member States 2003-20072003–2007 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2009 (cadmium) | EU Member States 2003-20072003–2007 | max. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2012 | Europe, all samples2003–2011 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2012 | Europe, all samples2003–2011 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2012 | Europe, all samples2003–2011 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedHong Kong TDS 2013 | Hong Kong market2010–2011 | mean.Same samples: 16–120 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedHong Kong TDS 2013 | Hong Kong market2010–2011 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20152015 | mean.Same samples: Q1 21.5 µg/kg; Q3 170 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20152015 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20152015 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20152015 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20162016 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20162016 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20162016 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20162016 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20172017 | mean.Same samples: Q1 10 µg/kg; Q3 189 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20172017 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20172017 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20172017 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20182018 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; All2015–2018 | mean.Same samples: Q1 21 µg/kg; Q3 135 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; All2015–2018 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; All2015–2018 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; All2015–2018 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2015 | mean.Same samples: Q1 123 µg/kg; Q3 302 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2015 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2015 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2015 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2016 | mean.Same samples: Q1 112 µg/kg; Q3 182 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2016 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2016 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2016 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2017 | mean.Same samples: Q1 170 µg/kg; Q3 249 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2017 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2017 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2017 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2018 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2015–2018 | mean.Same samples: Q1 113 µg/kg; Q3 229 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2015–2018 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2015–2018 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2015–2018 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; 20152015 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; 20162016 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; All2015–2017 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1 mean, 2019 vs 20142014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate, all2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: up to 740 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate, all2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: 7–100 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: 30–740 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: 10–180 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: 10–90 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: 40–120 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: 10–60 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: up to 100 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: 16–31 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedCantoral et al. 2024 | Chocolate Bars2022–2023 | sample value. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEileen et al. 2020 | AfricaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEileen et al. 2020 | AsiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEileen et al. 2020 | Central AmericaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEileen et al. 2020 | IndiaCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 10–2,730 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEileen et al. 2020 | IndiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEileen et al. 2020 | IndiaCollection date unreported | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEileen et al. 2020 | MalaysiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEileen et al. 2020 | NigeriaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEileen et al. 2020 | PakistanCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEileen et al. 2020 | South AmericaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | <30% total cocoa solids2011 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | >=30 to <50% total cocoa solids2011 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | >=50 to <70% total cocoa solids2011 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | >=70% total cocoa solids2011 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | G022011 | below LOD. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | G032011 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 31 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | G032011 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | G032011 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | G042011 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 121 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | G042011 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | G042011 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | G052011 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 878 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | G052011 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | G052011 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | G062011 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 126 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | G062011 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | G062011 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | G072011 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 172 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | G072011 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | G072011 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | G092011 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | G092011 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | G102011 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 310 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | G102011 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | G102011 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | Global2011 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 576 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | Global2011 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | Global2011 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | WHO European Region2011 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 337 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | WHO European Region2011 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedJECFA 2022 | WHO European Region2011 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedKataoka et al. 2018 | <50%2015–2016 | mean.Same samples: 13–180 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedKataoka et al. 2018 | <50%2015–2016 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedKataoka et al. 2018 | <50%2015–2016 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedKataoka et al. 2018 | >=80%2015–2016 | mean.Same samples: 53–710 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedKataoka et al. 2018 | >=80%2015–2016 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedKataoka et al. 2018 | >=80%2015–2016 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedKataoka et al. 2018 | 50% to <70%2015–2016 | mean.Same samples: 18–740 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedKataoka et al. 2018 | 50% to <70%2015–2016 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedKataoka et al. 2018 | 50% to <70%2015–2016 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedKataoka et al. 2018 | 70% to <80%2015–2016 | mean.Same samples: 50–2,300 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedKataoka et al. 2018 | 70% to <80%2015–2016 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedKataoka et al. 2018 | 70% to <80%2015–2016 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedKataoka et al. 2018 | Total chocolate2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedKataoka et al. 2018 | Total chocolate2015–2016 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedKataoka et al. 2018 | Total chocolate2015–2016 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedKataoka et al. 2018 | Total labelled2015–2016 | mean.Same samples: 13–2,300 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedKataoka et al. 2018 | Total labelled2015–2016 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedKataoka et al. 2018 | Total labelled2015–2016 | range. | ||
67 findings · 8 studies · 6 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2003–2020 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; targeted sampling2003–2006 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; random sampling2002–2020 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; unknown2020 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsANSES TDS3 2026 | France TDS3 food group2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (cadmium) | EU Member States 2003-20072003–2007 | mean.Same samples: 5th percentile 8 µg/kg; 95th percentile 500 µg/kg; 2,080 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (cadmium) | EU Member States 2003-20072003–2007 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (cadmium) | EU Member States 2003-20072003–2007 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (cadmium) | EU Member States 2003-20072003–2007 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (cadmium) | EU Member States 2003-20072003–2007 | max. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsUK TDS 2014 | UK TDS category 10_60 "Chocolate2014 | sample value. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAmjad et al. 2021 | All samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAmjad et al. 2021 | All samplesCollection date unreported | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3, AYS2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao; all products2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao; all products2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao; all products2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao; all products2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao; blended beans2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao; blended beans2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao; blended beans2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao; blended beans2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEileen et al. 2018 | all 144 products2015–2016 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEileen et al. 2018 | percent cocoa not declared on2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2014 cohort2014 | mean.Same samples: 60–1,520 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2014 cohort2014 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2014 cohort2014 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2016 cohort2016 | mean.Same samples: 100–2,200 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2016 cohort2016 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2016 cohort2016 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2019 cohort2019 | mean.Same samples: 54–982 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2019 cohort2019 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2019 cohort2019 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2022 cohort2022 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2022 cohort2022 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2022 cohort2022 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | all cohorts 2014-20222014–2022 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | all cohorts 2014-20222014–2022 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | all cohorts 2014-20222014–2022 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | products exceeding Prop 65 MADL2014–2022 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | products with per-day data2014–2022 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | products with per-day data2014–2022 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | products with per-day data2014–2022 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | products with serving data2014–2022 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | products with serving data2014–2022 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | products with serving data2014–2022 | range. | ||
190 findings · 9 studies · 32 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Cocoa beans and nibsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2004–2019Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2003–2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; random sampling2014Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; random sampling2014Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Amazonas2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Blanco Piurano2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Cajamarca2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | CCN512014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | CCN51/ICS952014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | CCN51/ICS95/ICS392014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Chuncho2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Cuzco2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Huanuco2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Junin2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Native from Maranon2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Native from Satipo2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Piura2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | San Martin2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Spontaneous Hybrids2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Tumbes2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Abt & Robin 2020, commercial nibs2014–2020Bean basis as reported | below LOD. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Abt 2018 US market2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Aikpokpodion 2013 Nigeria2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Aikpokpodion 2013 Nigeria, Ogun2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Aikpokpodion 2013 Nigeria, Ondo2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 5.5 µg/kg; Q3 25 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2016Bean basis as reported | not detected. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | all SD bean samples with Pb2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Arevalo-Gardini 2016/2017 Peru2014–2020Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Arevalo-Gardini 2017 Peru2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Arevalo-Gardini 2017 Peru, Piura2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 10 µg/kg; Q3 33 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2016Bean basis as reported | not detected. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 10 µg/kg; Q3 87 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Cleaned Beans2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Cleaned beans2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Cleaned beans - detergent washed2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Cleaned beans - mechanical2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Columbia2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Columbia2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Columbia2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Danquah 2015 Ghana, Brong Ahafo2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Danquah 2015 Ghana2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Danquah 2015 Ghana2014–2020Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Danquah 2015 Ghana, organic farms2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Danquah 2015 Ghana, Western2014–2020Bean basis as reported | below LOD. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Median 5 µg/kg; Q3 12.6 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2016Bean basis as reported | not detected. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2016Bean basis as reported | not detected. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2016–2018Bean basis as reported | not detected. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2016Bean basis as reported | not detected. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2017Bean basis as reported | not detected. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Haiti2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Haiti2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 6 µg/kg; Q3 8.7 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 24 µg/kg; Q3 32.5 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2016–2018Bean basis as reported | not detected. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2016Bean basis as reported | not detected. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2017Bean basis as reported | not detected. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Kruszewski 2018 Poland2014–2020Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Lee & Low 1985 Malaysia2014–2020Bean basis as reported | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Nartey 2012 Ghana2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Nibs Only2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Nigeria2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Median 25 µg/kg; Q3 80 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Nigeria2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Nigeria2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Nigeria2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Nigeria2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Nigeria, six farms2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Nigeria, six farms2014–2020Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | overall nib2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 10 µg/kg; Q3 31 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2016Bean basis as reported | not detected. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 6.7 µg/kg; Q3 13.4 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2016Bean basis as reported | not detected. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Philippines2016–2018Bean basis as reported | not detected. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Philippines2017Bean basis as reported | not detected. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Prewinnower nib2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Received beans - uncleaned2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Received Beans - Whole Beans2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Romero-Estevez 2019 Ecuador, Napo2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Romero-Estevez 2019 Ecuador2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Sao Tome2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 10 µg/kg; Q3 31.5 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Sao Tome2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Sao Tome2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Sao Tome2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Sao Tome2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Tanzania2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 10 µg/kg; Q3 147 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Tanzania2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Tanzania2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Tanzania2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Tanzania2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Ubilla 2018 Ecuador2014–2020Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Unknown2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Venezuela2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: Q1 68.2 µg/kg; Q3 133 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Venezuela2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Venezuela2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Venezuela2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Venezuela2014–2020Bean basis as reported | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Vietnam2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Vietnam2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Waste - Overs2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Winnower All Nib Channels2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Winnower Nib Channel 12020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Winnower Nib Channel 22020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Winnower Nib Channel 32020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Winnower Nib Channel 42020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Winnower Nib Channel 52020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Winnower Nib Channel 62020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Yanus 2014 Israel2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Zarcinas 2004 Malaysia2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBurgon 2023 | cocoa beans, all regions2020–2022Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBurgon 2023 | cocoa beans, all regions2020–2022Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBurgon 2023 | cocoa beans, Amazonas2020–2022Bean basis as reported | below LOD. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBurgon 2023 | cocoa beans, Amazonas2020–2022Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBurgon 2023 | cocoa beans, Bahia2020–2022Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: up to 313 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBurgon 2023 | cocoa beans, Bahia2020–2022Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBurgon 2023 | cocoa beans, Espírito Santo2020–2022Bean basis as reported | below LOD. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBurgon 2023 | cocoa beans, Pará2020–2022Bean basis as reported | below LOD. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016Bean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: up to 10 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016Bean basis as reported | below LOD. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsEileen et al. 2020 | AsiaCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsEileen et al. 2020 | Latin America2015–2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Africa/CICollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 37–1,040 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Africa/CICollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Brazil/BACollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: up to 2,170 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Brazil/BACollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Brazil/ESCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 365–756 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Brazil/ESCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Brazil/PACollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: 291–2,530 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Brazil/PACollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Brazil/ROCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: up to 624 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Brazil/ROCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Ecuador/EQCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean.Same samples: up to 50 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsFerreira et al. 2021 | Ecuador/EQCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | All nine provincesCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | All nine provincesCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | EsmeraldasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | GuayasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | NapoCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | Santo Domingo de los TsáchilasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsVineta et al. 2016 | CameroonCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsVineta et al. 2016 | EcuadorCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsVineta et al. 2016 | GhanaCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsVineta et al. 2016 | NigeriaCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
75 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | All Countries2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | all SD shell samples2014–2020Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Assa 2018 Indonesia2014–2020Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Danquah 2015 Ghana factory2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Dominican2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Haiti2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Haiti2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Nartey 2012 Ghana2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Nigeria, six farms2014–2020Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2016Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Peru2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Philippines2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Philippines2016–2018Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Philippines2017Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Philippines2017Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | shell, Overall Study2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | shell, Replicate 12020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | shell, Replicate 22020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | shell, Replicate 32020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | shell, Replicate 42020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | shell, Replicate 52020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Shells Only2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Ubilla 2018 Ecuador2014–2020Bean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Vietnam2016–2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Vietnam2018Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellAs You Sow 2022 | Yanus 2014 Israel2014–2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellFerreira et al. 2021 | pilot processing batch: shellCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
91 findings · 3 studies · 48 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)WHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2012–2017 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)WHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2003–2011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)WHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; random sampling2018 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)WHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2005–2013 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Blended2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 30 µg/kg; Q3 70 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Blended2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Blended2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Blended2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Blended2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 60 µg/kg; Q3 115 µg/kg; Q3 100 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 44.5 µg/kg; Q3 79.3 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Canada2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Canada2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Canada2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 19 µg/kg; Q3 41.9 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 12 µg/kg; Q1 10.5 µg/kg; Q3 53 µg/kg; Q3 37 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Dominican2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 34.8 µg/kg; Q1 33 µg/kg; Q3 60 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Median 20 µg/kg; Q3 30 µg/kg; Q3 39 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Haiti2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 42 µg/kg; Q3 75 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Haiti2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Haiti2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Haiti2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Haiti2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Haiti2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Haiti2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Haiti2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Haiti2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Haiti2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 50 µg/kg; Q1 53 µg/kg; Median 60 µg/kg; Q3 101 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 28.3 µg/kg; Q1 22 µg/kg; Q3 50 µg/kg; Q3 40 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Kruszewski 2018 Poland2014–2020 | range. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 31 µg/kg; Median 60 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Mexico2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Mexico2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Mexico2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Mexico2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Mexico2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Nigeria2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 68.3 µg/kg; Q3 89.9 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Nigeria2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Nigeria2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Nigeria2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Nigeria2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 26.8 µg/kg; Q3 33.8 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Papua New Guinea2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Tanzania2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 60 µg/kg; Q3 87.5 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Tanzania2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Tanzania2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Tanzania2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Tanzania2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 28.2 µg/kg; Q3 68.1 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Unknown2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 13.2 µg/kg; Q3 28 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Unknown2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Unknown2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Unknown2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)As You Sow 2022 | Unknown2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)Ferreira et al. 2021 | pilot processing batch: liquorCollection date unreported | below LOD. | ||
27 findings · 4 studies | ||||
| Cocoa butterWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2008–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2003–2007 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; random sampling2018 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2004–2013 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | all SD cocoa butter samples2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Combined2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | France2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | France2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Ghana2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Kruszewski 2018 Poland2014–2020 | below LOD. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa butterAs You Sow 2022 | Yanus 2014 Israel2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa butterFerreira et al. 2021 | pilot processing batch: cocoaCollection date unreported | below LOD. | ||
| Cocoa butterJECFA 2011 | Singapore market 20082008 | below LOD. | ||
105 findings · 7 studies · 41 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EMRO; unknown2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; random sampling2013–2018 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2004–2013 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderFDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | United States national collections2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Abt 2018 US market2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Africa, Middle East, Asia2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 86.5 µg/kg; Q3 149 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Africa, Middle East, Asia2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Africa, Middle East, Asia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Africa, Middle East, Asia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 80 µg/kg; Q3 180 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All countries2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All data2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 80 µg/kg; Q3 180 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All data2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All data2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All data2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All Regions2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 80 µg/kg; Q3 152 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All Regions2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All Regions2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | All Regions2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | all SD cocoa powder ingredient2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Asia Pacific2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Asia Pacific2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Belgium2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Belgium2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Belgium2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Blended2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 80 µg/kg; Q3 165 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Blended2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Blended2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Blended2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Blended2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: IQR 160 µg/kg; Q3 320 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Brazil2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 107 µg/kg; Q3 175 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Cameroon2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Danquah 2015 Ghana factory2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Ecuador2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Europe2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 54.5 µg/kg; Q3 80.5 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Europe2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Europe2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Europe2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Europe, Middle East, Africa2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | France2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 51 µg/kg; Q3 84.5 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | France2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | France2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | France2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | France2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Germany2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 90 µg/kg; Q3 190 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Germany2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Germany2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Germany2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Germany2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Gray & Cunningham 20192014–2020 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | India2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | India2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | India2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 158 µg/kg; Q3 310 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Indonesia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 80 µg/kg; Q1 99.3 µg/kg; Q3 100 µg/kg; Q3 179 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Ivory Coast2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Kruszewski 2018 Poland2014–2020 | range. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Latin America2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Latin America2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Lo Dico 2018 Italy2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 60 µg/kg; Q3 100 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Malaysia2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Mexico2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 80 µg/kg; Q3 130 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Mexico2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Mexico2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Mexico2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Mexico2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | North America2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 80 µg/kg; Q3 156 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | North America2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | North America2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | North America2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Spain2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 142 µg/kg; Q3 219 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Spain2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Spain2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Spain2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Spain2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | The Netherlands2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 70 µg/kg; Q3 104 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | The Netherlands2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | The Netherlands2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | The Netherlands2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | The Netherlands2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 75.8 µg/kg; Q3 138 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | United States2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Unknown2014–2020 | mean.Same samples: Q1 65 µg/kg; Q3 153 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Unknown2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Unknown2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Unknown2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Unknown2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderAs You Sow 2022 | Yanus 2014 Israel2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016 | mean.Same samples: 2–380 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016 | range. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2018 | origin not available or multiple2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | Africa2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | AsiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | Bahia, BrazilCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | EcuadorCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | El Oro, EcuadorCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | GhanaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | Habuna, BrazilCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | Ivory CoastCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | Latin America2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | MalaysiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderEileen et al. 2020 | VenezuelaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2022 | Cocoa powder, national pool2016–2019 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2022 | German Food Monitoring 20122012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFerreira et al. 2021 | pilot processing batch: cocoaCollection date unreported | below LOD. | ||
7 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2004–2019 | median. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2012 | median. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderElsheikh et al. 2020 | Brand 11Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderElsheikh et al. 2020 | Brand 12Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderElsheikh et al. 2020 | Brand 13Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderElsheikh et al. 2020 | Brand 14Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderFechner et al. 2022 | Cocoa beverage-preparation2016–2019 | sample value. | ||
55 findings · 6 studies · 3 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Dark chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2004–2019 | median. | ||
| Dark chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2004–2015 | median. | ||
| Dark chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; random sampling2013–2017 | median. | ||
| Dark chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2008–2013 | median. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Abt 2018 US market2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Group 2: >65% and <=95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Dark chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Lo Dico 2018 Italy, >50% cocoa2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Dark chocolateBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar Amargo2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: up to 40 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| Dark chocolateBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar Amargo2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Dark chocolateBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar Meio amargo2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: up to 60 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| Dark chocolateBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar Meio amargo2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Dark chocolateBurgon 2023 | conventional Amargo2020–2022 | sample value. | ||
| Dark chocolateBurgon 2023 | conventional Meio amargo2020–2022 | sample value. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016 | mean.Same samples: 2–110 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016 | median. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016 | range. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2018 | origin not available or multiple2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | Africa2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | AsiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | BrazilCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | Central AmericaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | East AfricaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | Latin America2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | South AmericaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | West AfricaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Dark chocolateFechner et al. 2022 | Dark chocolate, national pool2016–2019 | sample value. | ||
| Dark chocolateFechner et al. 2022 | German Food Monitoring 20122012 | mean. | ||
23 findings · 10 studies · 5 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2004–2019 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2009–2017 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; random sampling2000–2018 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2008–2014 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; targeted sampling1998–2008 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateFDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | United States national collections2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateEFSA 2010 | US Total Diet Study 1991-20052003–2009 | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 23rd ATDS | Australia, national food2008 | mean.Same samples: 12–56 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 23rd ATDS | Australia, national food2008 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 23rd ATDS | Australia, national food2008 | range. | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 25th ATDS | Australia, national food2013–2014 | mean.Same samples: 5–7 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 25th ATDS | Australia, national food2013–2014 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 25th ATDS | Australia, national food2013–2014 | range. | ||
| Milk chocolateAs You Sow 2022 | Abt 2018 US market2014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar Ao leite2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: up to 37 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| Milk chocolateBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar Ao leite2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Milk chocolateBurgon 2023 | conventional Ao leite2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: 7–11 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Milk chocolateBurgon 2023 | conventional Ao leite2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Milk chocolateEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016 | mean.Same samples: 2–70 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Milk chocolateEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateEileen et al. 2018 | all samples of this form2015–2016 | range. | ||
| Milk chocolateEileen et al. 2018 | origin not available or multiple2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | Africa2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | AsiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | BrazilCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateEileen et al. 2020 | Latin America2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateFechner et al. 2022 | Milk chocolate, conventional pool2016–2019 | sample value. | ||
| Milk chocolateFechner et al. 2022 | Milk chocolate, organic pool2016–2019 | sample value. | ||
6 findings · 2 studies · 1 spread figure folded in | ||||
| White chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2008–2019 | median. | ||
| White chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2010 | median. | ||
| White chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; random sampling2013 | median. | ||
| White chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2008–2013 | median. | ||
| White chocolateBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar Branco2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: up to 39 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| White chocolateBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar Branco2020–2022 | range. | ||
| White chocolateBurgon 2023 | conventional Branco2020–2022 | not detected. | ||
99 findings · 6 studies · 40 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region AFRO; random sampling2018 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region PAHO; random sampling2011–2019 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2008–2013 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedHong Kong TDS 2013 | Hong Kong market2010–2011 | mean.Same samples: 7–29 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedHong Kong TDS 2013 | Hong Kong market2010–2011 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Abt & Robin 20202014–2020 | sample value. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | all AYS products with Pb result2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20152015 | mean.Same samples: Q1 10 µg/kg; Q3 30 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20152015 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20152015 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20152015 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20162016 | mean.Same samples: IQR 10 µg/kg; Q3 20 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20162016 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20162016 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20162016 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20172017 | mean.Same samples: Q1 10.6 µg/kg; Q3 29 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20172017 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20172017 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20172017 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20182018 | mean.Same samples: IQR 10 µg/kg; Median 20 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20182018 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20182018 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; 20182018 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; All2015–2018 | mean.Same samples: Q1 10 µg/kg; Q3 28 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; All2015–2018 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; All2015–2018 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with <65% cacao; All2015–2018 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2015 | mean.Same samples: Q1 11.1 µg/kg; Q3 40 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2015 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2015 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2015 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2016 | mean.Same samples: Q1 20 µg/kg; Q3 48 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2016 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2016 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2016 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2017 | mean.Same samples: Q1 40 µg/kg; Q3 60 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2017 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2017 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2017 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2018 | mean.Same samples: Q1 12.5 µg/kg; Q3 60 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2018 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2018 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2018 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2015–2018 | mean.Same samples: Q1 20 µg/kg; Q3 50 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2015–2018 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2015–2018 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >65% and <95% cacao2015–2018 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; 20152015 | mean.Same samples: Median 17.3 µg/kg; Q3 80 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; 20152015 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; 20152015 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; 20152015 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; 20162016 | mean.Same samples: Q1 28 µg/kg; Q3 90 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; 20162016 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; 20162016 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; 20162016 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; 20172017 | mean.Same samples: Q1 60 µg/kg; Q3 100 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; 20172017 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; 20172017 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; 20172017 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; 20182018 | mean.Same samples: Q1 17.3 µg/kg; Q3 100 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; 20182018 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; 20182018 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; 20182018 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; All2015–2017 | mean.Same samples: Q1 17.3 µg/kg; Q3 90 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; All2015–2017 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; All2015–2017 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | chocolate with >95% cacao; All2015–2017 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1 mean, 2019 vs 20142014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Group 1: up to 65% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Kruszewski 2018 Poland2014–2020 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Lo Dico 2018 Italy, <30% cocoa2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Lo Dico 2018 Italy, 30-50% cocoa2014–2020 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | NIST SRM 23842014–2020 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | SD chocolate <=65% cocoa solids2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | SD chocolate >95% cocoa solids2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedAs You Sow 2022 | Villa 2014 Brazil2014–2020 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate, all2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: up to 60 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate, all2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: 20–20 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: up to 30 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: up to 50 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: up to 60 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | below LOD. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: up to 8 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: up to 40 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | mean.Same samples: 10–20 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | bean-to-bar chocolate2020–2022 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEileen et al. 2020 | AfricaCollection date unreported | below LOD. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEileen et al. 2020 | AsiaCollection date unreported | below LOD. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEileen et al. 2020 | Central AmericaCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEileen et al. 2020 | IndiaCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 236–8,040 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEileen et al. 2020 | IndiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEileen et al. 2020 | IndiaCollection date unreported | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEileen et al. 2020 | MalaysiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEileen et al. 2020 | NigeriaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEileen et al. 2020 | PakistanCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEileen et al. 2020 | South AmericaCollection date unreported | below LOD. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEmmanuel et al. 2025 | Mean conc.Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEmmanuel et al. 2025 | Samples A and BCollection date unreported | range. | ||
73 findings · 9 studies · 16 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsANSES TDS3 2026 | France TDS3 food group2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2010 | EU Member States 2003-20092003–2009 | mean.Same samples: 5th percentile 0 µg/kg; 95th percentile 173 µg/kg; 5th percentile 11 µg/kg; 95th percentile 227 µg/kg; 95th percentile 359 µg/kg; 5th percentile 22 µg/kg; 1,240 µg/kg (maximum); 572 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2010 | EU Member States 2003-20092003–2009 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2010 | EU Member States 2003-20092003–2009 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2010 | EU Member States 2003-20092003–2009 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2010 | EU Member States 2003-20092003–2009 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2010 | EU Member States 2003-20092003–2009 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2010 | EU Member States 2003-20092003–2009 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2010 | EU Member States 2003-20092003–2009 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2010 | EU Member States 2003-20092003–2009 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2010 | EU Member States 2003-20092003–2009 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2010 | EU Member States 2003-20092003–2009 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2010 | EU Member States 2003-20092003–2009 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2010 | EU Member States 2003-20092003–2009 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2010 | EU Member States 2003-20092003–2009 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2010 | EU Member States 2003-20092003–2009 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2010 | EU Member States 2003-20092003–2009 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2010 | EU Member States 2003-20092003–2009 | max. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2010 | EU Member States 2003-20092003–2009 | max. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2010 | EU Member States 2003-20092003–2009 | max. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2010 | EU Member States 2003-20092003–2009 | max. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsUK TDS 2014 | UK TDS category 10_60 "Chocolate2014 | sample value. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAmjad et al. 2021 | All samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAmjad et al. 2021 | All samplesCollection date unreported | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Danquah 2015 Ghana factory2014–2020 | below LOD. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao; all products2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao; all products2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao; all products2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao; all products2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao; blended beans2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao; blended beans2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao; blended beans2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao; blended beans2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Group 3: >95% cacao2014–2020 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Mounicou 20032014–2020 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Waste - Aspiration dust2020 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAs You Sow 2022 | Waste - Unders2020 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEileen et al. 2018 | all 144 products2015–2016 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEileen et al. 2018 | percent cocoa not declared on2015–2016 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2014 cohort2014 | mean.Same samples: 25–269 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2014 cohort2014 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2014 cohort2014 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2016 cohort2016 | mean.Same samples: 50–141 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2016 cohort2016 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2016 cohort2016 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2019 cohort2019 | mean.Same samples: 25–106 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2019 cohort2019 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2019 cohort2019 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2022 cohort2022 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2022 cohort2022 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2022 cohort2022 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | all cohorts 2014-20222014–2022 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | all cohorts 2014-20222014–2022 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | all cohorts 2014-20222014–2022 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | all cohorts, per day2014–2022 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | all cohorts, per day2014–2022 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | all cohorts, per day2014–2022 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | all cohorts, per listed serving2014–2022 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | all cohorts, per listed serving2014–2022 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | all cohorts, per listed serving2014–2022 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | products below FDA interim2014–2022 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | products exceeding Prop 65 MADL2014–2022 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsJECFA 2011 | Singapore market 20082008 | mean.Same samples: 45,400 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsJECFA 2011 | Singapore market 20082008 | max. | ||
23 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Cocoa beans and nibsEFSA 2015 | literature compilation2003–2012Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Amazonas2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Blanco Piurano2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Cajamarca2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | CCN512014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | CCN51/ICS952014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | CCN51/ICS95/ICS392014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Chuncho2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Cuzco2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Huanuco2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Junin2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Native from Maranon2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Native from Satipo2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Piura2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | San Martin2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Spontaneous Hybrids2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Tumbes2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | All nine provincesCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | All nine provincesCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | range. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | AzuayCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | BolívarCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | EsmeraldasCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsRomero-Estevez et al. 2019 | ManabíCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Cocoa butterEFSA 2015 | EU monitoring 2003-20122003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa butterEFSA 2015 | EU monitoring 2003-20122003–2012 | mean. | ||
4 findings · 3 studies · 1 spread figure folded in | ||||
| Cocoa powderFDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | United States national collections2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2022 | Cocoa powder, national pool2016–2019 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2022 | German Food Monitoring 20122012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderMari-Ann et al. 1984 | CocoaCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 8,200–12,000 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa powderMari-Ann et al. 1984 | CocoaCollection date unreported | range. | ||
6 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderEFSA 2015 | Brazil, Campinas local market2003–2012 | below LOD. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderElsheikh et al. 2020 | Brand 11Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderElsheikh et al. 2020 | Brand 12Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderElsheikh et al. 2020 | Brand 13Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderElsheikh et al. 2020 | Brand 14Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderFechner et al. 2022 | Cocoa beverage-preparation2016–2019 | sample value. | ||
6 findings · 3 studies · 1 spread figure folded in | ||||
| Dark chocolateEFSA 2015 | EU monitoring 2003-20122003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEFSA 2015 | EU monitoring 2003-20122003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateEFSA 2015 | Slovenia, 42 selected products2003–2012 | max. | ||
| Dark chocolateFechner et al. 2022 | Dark chocolate, national pool2016–2019 | sample value. | ||
| Dark chocolateFechner et al. 2022 | German Food Monitoring 20122012 | mean. | ||
| Dark chocolateMari-Ann et al. 1984 | Bitter chocolateCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 1,300–2,700 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Dark chocolateMari-Ann et al. 1984 | Bitter chocolateCollection date unreported | range. | ||
6 findings · 4 studies · 1 spread figure folded in | ||||
| Milk chocolateFDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | United States national collections2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateEFSA 2015 | EU monitoring 2003-20122003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateEFSA 2015 | EU monitoring 2003-20122003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateFechner et al. 2022 | Milk chocolate, conventional pool2016–2019 | sample value. | ||
| Milk chocolateFechner et al. 2022 | Milk chocolate, organic pool2016–2019 | sample value. | ||
| Milk chocolateMari-Ann et al. 1984 | Milk chocolateCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 400–1,200 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Milk chocolateMari-Ann et al. 1984 | Milk chocolateCollection date unreported | range. | ||
8 findings · 3 studies · 3 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2015 | EU monitoring 2003-20122003–2012 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 6,100 µg/kg | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2015 | EU monitoring 2003-20122003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2015 | EU monitoring 2003-20122003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2015 | EU monitoring 2003-20122003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2015 | EU monitoring 2003-20122003–2012 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2015 | EU monitoring 2003-20122003–2012 | percentile. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2015 | France TDS12003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedHong Kong TDS 2013 | Hong Kong market2010–2011 | mean.Same samples: 510–1,800 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedHong Kong TDS 2013 | Hong Kong market2010–2011 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEmmanuel et al. 2025 | Mean conc.Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEmmanuel et al. 2025 | Samples A and BCollection date unreported | range. | ||
5 findings · 3 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2015 | EU monitoring 2003-20122003–2012 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 12,000 µg/kg | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2015 | EU monitoring 2003-20122003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2015 | EU monitoring 2003-20122003–2012 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2015 | EU monitoring 2003-20122003–2012 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsUK TDS 2014 | UK TDS category 10_60 "Chocolate2014 | sample value. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAmjad et al. 2021 | All samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAmjad et al. 2021 | All samplesCollection date unreported | range. | ||
10 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Cocoa beans and nibsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2010–2023Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; targeted sampling2022Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2012Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region European Union2007–2014Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region European Union; unknown2003–2012Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsBurgon 2023 | cocoa beans, all regions2020–2022Bean basis as reported | not detected. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsVineta et al. 2016 | CameroonCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | below LOD. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsVineta et al. 2016 | EcuadorCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | below LOD. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsVineta et al. 2016 | GhanaCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | below LOD. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsVineta et al. 2016 | NigeriaCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | below LOD. | ||
5 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)WHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2013–2023 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)WHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2011 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)WHO GEMS/Food | WHO region European Union2007–2014 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)WHO GEMS/Food | WHO region European Union; unknown2003 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)WHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2005 | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Cocoa butterWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2016–2022 | median. | ||
8 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2007–2023 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; targeted sampling2020–2023 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2009–2022 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region European Union2004–2014 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region European Union; unknown2009–2012 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2005 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderFDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | United States national collections2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderEFSA 2009 (arsenic) | Poland1995–2008 | mean. | ||
5 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2007–2023 | median. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderElsheikh et al. 2020 | Brand 11Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderElsheikh et al. 2020 | Brand 12Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderElsheikh et al. 2020 | Brand 13Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderElsheikh et al. 2020 | Brand 14Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
4 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Dark chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2007–2023 | median. | ||
| Dark chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; targeted sampling2016 | median. | ||
| Dark chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2007–2022 | median. | ||
| Dark chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region European Union2007–2008 | median. | ||
12 findings · 4 studies · 1 spread figure folded in | ||||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2007–2023 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; targeted sampling2016–2021 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2007–2022 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region European Union2007–2008 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2014 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; targeted sampling1998–2008 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateFDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | United States national collections2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 23rd ATDS | Australia, national food2008 | mean.Same samples: up to 37 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 23rd ATDS | Australia, national food2008 | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 23rd ATDS | Australia, national food2008 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 23rd ATDS | Australia, national food2008 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 23rd ATDS | Australia, national food2008 | range. | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 25th ATDS | Australia, national food2013–2014 | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| White chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2014–2021 | median. | ||
7 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region AFRO; random sampling2018 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2007–2023 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; targeted sampling2017–2022 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2007–2015 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region European Union2007–2008 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2008–2009 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | all chocolates2020–2022 | not detected. | ||
30 findings · 4 studies · 13 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2007–2022 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2007–2015 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (arsenic) | EU Member States, all samples1995–2008 | mean.Same samples: 5th percentile 0 µg/kg; 95th percentile 40 µg/kg; 5th percentile 8.5 µg/kg; 95th percentile 70 µg/kg; 95th percentile 155 µg/kg; 5th percentile 10 µg/kg; 385 µg/kg (maximum); 830 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (arsenic) | EU Member States, all samples1995–2008 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (arsenic) | EU Member States, all samples1995–2008 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (arsenic) | EU Member States, all samples1995–2008 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (arsenic) | EU Member States, all samples1995–2008 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (arsenic) | EU Member States, all samples1995–2008 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (arsenic) | EU Member States, all samples1995–2008 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (arsenic) | EU Member States, all samples1995–2008 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (arsenic) | EU Member States, all samples1995–2008 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (arsenic) | EU Member States, all samples1995–2008 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (arsenic) | EU Member States, all samples1995–2008 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (arsenic) | EU Member States, all samples1995–2008 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (arsenic) | EU Member States, all samples1995–2008 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (arsenic) | EU Member States, all samples1995–2008 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (arsenic) | EU Member States, all samples1995–2008 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (arsenic) | EU Member States, all samples1995–2008 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (arsenic) | EU Member States, all samples1995–2008 | max. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (arsenic) | EU Member States, all samples1995–2008 | max. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (arsenic) | EU Member States, all samples1995–2008 | max. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2009 (arsenic) | EU Member States, all samples1995–2008 | max. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsUK TDS 2014 | UK TDS category 10_60 "Chocolate2014 | sample value. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2014 cohort2014 | not detected. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2016 cohort2016 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2016 cohort2016 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2016 cohort2016 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2019 cohort2019 | mean.Same samples: 37–200 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2019 cohort2019 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2019 cohort2019 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2022 cohort2022 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2022 cohort2022 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | 2022 cohort2022 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | all cohorts tested for As2016–2022 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | all cohorts tested for As2016–2022 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | all cohorts tested for As2016–2022 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | products exceeding Prop 65 MADL 102014–2022 | percentile. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | products with per-day data2014–2022 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | products with per-day data2014–2022 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | products with per-day data2014–2022 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | products with serving data2014–2022 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | products with serving data2014–2022 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsHands et al. 2024 | products with serving data2014–2022 | range. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2017–2023 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2021 | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2017–2023 | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Dark chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2017–2023 | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2017–2023 | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| White chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2020 | median. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2017–2018 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2010 | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsUK TDS 2014 | UK TDS category 10_60 "Chocolate2014 | below LOD. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2022 | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2022 | median. | ||
6 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Cocoa beans and nibsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2012–2016Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2012–2013Bean basis as reported | median. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsVineta et al. 2016 | CameroonCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | below LOD. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsVineta et al. 2016 | EcuadorCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | below LOD. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsVineta et al. 2016 | GhanaCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | below LOD. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsVineta et al. 2016 | NigeriaCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | below LOD. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)WHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2007–2015 | median. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)WHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2011 | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Cocoa butterWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2013–2016 | median. | ||
5 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2004–2017 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2009–2017 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2005 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderFDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | United States national collections2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2022 | Cocoa powder, national pool2016–2019 | below LOD. | ||
3 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2004–2019 | median. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2012 | median. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderFechner et al. 2022 | Cocoa beverage-preparation2016–2019 | below LOD. | ||
3 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Dark chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2004–2017 | median. | ||
| Dark chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2011–2017 | median. | ||
| Dark chocolateFechner et al. 2022 | Dark chocolate, national pool2016–2019 | below LOD. | ||
10 findings · 5 studies · 1 spread figure folded in | ||||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2004–2017 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2011–2017 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2014 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; targeted sampling1998–2008 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateFDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | United States national collections2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 23rd ATDS | Australia, national food2008 | mean.Same samples: 5.6–9.4 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 23rd ATDS | Australia, national food2008 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 23rd ATDS | Australia, national food2008 | range. | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 25th ATDS | Australia, national food2013–2014 | not detected. | ||
| Milk chocolateFechner et al. 2022 | Milk chocolate, conventional pool2016–2019 | below LOD. | ||
| Milk chocolateFechner et al. 2022 | Milk chocolate, organic pool2016–2019 | below LOD. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| White chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2007–2017 | median. | ||
4 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region AFRO; random sampling2018 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2004–2016 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2011–2012 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedBurgon 2023 | all chocolates2020–2022 | not detected. | ||
5 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2004–2020 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; unknown2015–2017 | median. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsANSES TDS3 2026 | France TDS3 food group2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsANSES TDS3 2026 | France TDS3 food group2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsUK TDS 2014 | UK TDS category 10_60 "Chocolate2014 | below LOD. | ||
16 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Amazonas2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Blanco Piurano2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Cajamarca2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | CCN512014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | CCN51/ICS952014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | CCN51/ICS95/ICS392014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Chuncho2014Bean basis as reported | below LOD. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Cuzco2014Bean basis as reported | not detected. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Huanuco2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Junin2014Bean basis as reported | not detected. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Native from Maranon2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Native from Satipo2014Bean basis as reported | below LOD. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Piura2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | San Martin2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Spontaneous Hybrids2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsArévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 | Tumbes2014Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)EFSA 2014 | EU monitoring 2000-20122000–2012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa liquor (mass)EFSA 2014 | EU monitoring 2000-20122000–2012 | mean. | ||
3 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Cocoa powderFDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | United States national collections2020 | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderEFSA 2014 | EU monitoring 2000-20122000–2012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderEFSA 2014 | EU monitoring 2000-20122000–2012 | mean. | ||
5 findings · 3 studies · 1 spread figure folded in | ||||
| Milk chocolateFDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | United States national collections2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateEFSA 2014 | EU monitoring 2000-20122000–2012 | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateEFSA 2014 | EU monitoring 2000-20122000–2012 | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 23rd ATDS | Australia, national food2008 | mean.Same samples: up to 270 µg/kg (range maximum) | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 23rd ATDS | Australia, national food2008 | mean. | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 23rd ATDS | Australia, national food2008 | range. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| White chocolateEFSA 2014 | EU monitoring 2000-20122000–2012 | mean. | ||
| White chocolateEFSA 2014 | EU monitoring 2000-20122000–2012 | mean. | ||
8 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2014 | EU monitoring 2000-20122000–2012 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2014 | EU monitoring 2000-20122000–2012 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2014 | EU monitoring 2000-20122000–2012 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2014 | EU monitoring 2000-20122000–2012 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2014 | EU monitoring 2000-20122000–2012 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2014 | EU monitoring 2000-20122000–2012 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEmmanuel et al. 2025 | Mean conc.Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEmmanuel et al. 2025 | Samples A and BCollection date unreported | range. | ||
6 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2014 | EU monitoring 2000-20122000–2012 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2014 | EU monitoring 2000-20122000–2012 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2014 | literature2000–2012 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsUK TDS 2014 | UK TDS category 10_60 "Chocolate2014 | sample value. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAmjad et al. 2021 | All samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsAmjad et al. 2021 | All samplesCollection date unreported | range. | ||
10 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Prewinnower2020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Winnower Channel 12020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Winnower Channel 22020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Winnower Channel 32020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Winnower Channel 42020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsAs You Sow 2022 | Winnower Channel 52020Bean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsVineta et al. 2016 | Cameroon kernelsCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsVineta et al. 2016 | Ecuador kernelsCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsVineta et al. 2016 | Ghana kernelsCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa beans and nibsVineta et al. 2016 | Nigeria kernelsCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
4 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Cocoa bean shellVineta et al. 2016 | Cameroon shellsCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellVineta et al. 2016 | Ecuador shellsCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellVineta et al. 2016 | Ghana shellsCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
| Cocoa bean shellVineta et al. 2016 | Nigeria shellsCollection date unreportedBean basis as reported | mean. | ||
29 findings · 2 studies · 8 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | 20082008 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 231,000 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | 20082008 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | 20122012 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 216,000 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | 20122012 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Africa2008–2012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | African origins summarised2008–2012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | All samples2008–2012 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 223,000 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | All samples2008–2012 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | American origins summarised2008–2012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Austria2008–2012 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Bolivia2008–2012 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Côte d'Ivoire2008–2012 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Dominican Republic2008–2012 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | European origins summarised2008–2012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | France, incl. Corsica2008–2012 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Germany2008–2012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Grouping 1 Origin A2008–2012 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 117,000 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Grouping 1 Origin A2008–2012 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Grouping 1 Origin B2008–2012 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 276,000 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Grouping 1 Origin B2008–2012 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Grouping 2 Origin A2008–2012 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 110,000 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Grouping 2 Origin A2008–2012 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Grouping 2 Origin B2008–2012 | mean.Same samples: 95th percentile 276,000 µg/kg | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Grouping 2 Origin B2008–2012 | percentile. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Indonesia2008–2012 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Italy2008–2012 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Not specified2008–2012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Peru2008–2012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Poland2008–2012 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Russian Federation2008–2012 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Spain2008–2012 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | Switzerland2008–2012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | The Netherlands2008–2012 | mean. | ||
| Cocoa powderFechner et al. 2019 | United Kingdom2008–2012 | sample value. | ||
| Cocoa powderStahl et al. 2017 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 80,000–312,000 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Cocoa powderStahl et al. 2017 | all samplesCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Cocoa powderStahl et al. 2017 | all samplesCollection date unreported | range. | ||
4 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderElsheikh et al. 2020 | Brand 11Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderElsheikh et al. 2020 | Brand 12Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderElsheikh et al. 2020 | Brand 13Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powderElsheikh et al. 2020 | Brand 14Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Dark chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2007–2008 | median. | ||
3 findings · 2 studies · 1 spread figure folded in | ||||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2007–2008 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 23rd ATDS | Australia, national food2008 | mean.Same samples: 2,700–11,200 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 23rd ATDS | Australia, national food2008 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateFSANZ 23rd ATDS | Australia, national food2008 | range. | ||
5 findings · 4 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2007–2008 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedEFSA 2008 | France, 1st Total Diet Study 20002000 | mean. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedHong Kong TDS 2013 | Hong Kong market2010–2011 | mean.Same samples: 4,000–19,000 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedHong Kong TDS 2013 | Hong Kong market2010–2011 | range. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedStahl et al. 2017 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 6,000–150,000 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedStahl et al. 2017 | all samplesCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedStahl et al. 2017 | all samplesCollection date unreported | range. | ||
3 findings · 3 studies · 1 spread figure folded in | ||||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsANSES TDS3 2026 | France TDS3 food group2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2008 | Germany 1988 and 19911988–1991 | mean.Same samples: 9,400–103,000 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsEFSA 2008 | Germany 1988 and 19911988–1991 | range. | ||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsUK TDS 2014 | UK TDS category 10_60 "Chocolate2014 | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Cocoa powderWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2005 | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Dark chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2007–2008 | median. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2007–2008 | median. | ||
| Milk chocolateWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; targeted sampling1998 | median. | ||
3 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region EURO; random sampling2007–2008 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedWHO GEMS/Food | WHO region WPRO; random sampling2010 | median. | ||
| Chocolate, type not specifiedHong Kong TDS 2013 | Hong Kong market2010–2011 | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Mixed cocoa and chocolate productsUK TDS 2014 | UK TDS category 10_60 "Chocolate2014 | below LOD. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Cocoa powderFDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | United States national collections2020 | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Milk chocolateFDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | United States national collections2018–2020 | not detected. | ||
Shared dataset methods and interpretation
Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.
HMI cocoa beans and nibs Cd reference · 7 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa beans and nibs Cd reference · 7 sampling families. Beans or nibs, dry or as-received weight as reported (cocoa beans are dried to about 7% moisture), µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 180 | 819 | 2170 |
| Alternative weighting | 206 | 819 | 2170 |
87 reference units; 7 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 22 | 14% |
| Eileen et al. 2018 | 7 | 14% |
| Barraza et al. 2019 | 4 | 14% |
| Blommaert et al. 2022 | 2 | 14% |
| Ferreira et al. 2021 | 9 | 14% |
| Burgon 2023 | 1 | 14% |
| As You Sow 2022 | 42 | 14% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa beans and nibs from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa beans and nibs, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
- WHO GEMS/Food
- Eileen et al. 2018
- Barraza et al. 2019
- Blommaert et al. 2022
- Ferreira et al. 2021
- Burgon 2023
- As You Sow 2022
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-beans-Cd:7f2f5d3c2640
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa bean shell Cd reference · 3 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa bean shell Cd reference · 3 sampling families. Shell (testa), dry weight as reported, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 124 | 429 | 2230 |
| Alternative weighting | 124 | 429 | 2230 |
25 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Blommaert et al. 2022 | 1 | 33% |
| Ferreira et al. 2021 | 1 | 33% |
| As You Sow 2022 | 23 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa bean shell from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa bean shell, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-shell-Cd:d0a46b9991a2
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa liquor (mass) Cd reference · 4 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa liquor (mass) Cd reference · 4 sampling families. Cocoa liquor as produced, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 60 | 176 | 1160 |
| Alternative weighting | 60 | 176 | 1160 |
27 reference units; 4 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 15 | 25% |
| Barraza et al. 2019 | 2 | 25% |
| Ferreira et al. 2021 | 1 | 25% |
| As You Sow 2022 | 9 | 25% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa liquor (mass) from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa liquor (mass), not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-liquor-Cd:76bf4a27a9ea
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa butter Cd reference · 3 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa butter Cd reference · 3 sampling families. Cocoa butter as produced, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1.5 | 1.75–7.1 (bounded) | 8.15–10 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1.5 | 1.75–7.1 (bounded) | 8.15–10 (bounded) |
13 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 8 | 33% |
| Ferreira et al. 2021 | 1 | 33% |
| As You Sow 2022 | 4 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa butter from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa butter, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-butter-Cd:d05325447e83
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa powder Cd reference · 9 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa powder Cd reference · 9 sampling families. Cocoa powder as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 140 | 274 | 400 |
| Alternative weighting | 140 | 274 | 400 |
227 reference units; 9 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 32 | 11% |
| FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | 1 | 11% |
| Eileen et al. 2018 | 39 | 11% |
| Kataoka et al. 2018 | 140 | 11% |
| Fechner et al. 2019 | 10 | 11% |
| Fechner et al. 2022 | 1 | 11% |
| Ferreira et al. 2021 | 1 | 11% |
| Cantoral et al. 2024 | 1 | 11% |
| As You Sow 2022 | 2 | 11% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa powder from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa powder, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
- WHO GEMS/Food
- FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020
- Eileen et al. 2018
- Kataoka et al. 2018
- Fechner et al. 2019
- Fechner et al. 2022
- Ferreira et al. 2021
- Cantoral et al. 2024
- As You Sow 2022
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-powder-Cd:556d9373bec3
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder Cd reference · 3 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder Cd reference · 3 sampling families. Powder as sold, before mixing into a drink, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 30.5 | 47 | 117 |
| Alternative weighting | 30.5 | 47 | 117 |
28 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 26 | 33% |
| Fechner et al. 2022 | 1 | 33% |
| Cantoral et al. 2024 | 1 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-sweetened_powder-Cd:b9aad70ca7ce
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI dark chocolate Cd reference · 7 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI dark chocolate Cd reference · 7 sampling families. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 49 | 110 | 130 |
| Alternative weighting | 49 | 110 | 162 |
230 reference units; 7 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 27 | 14% |
| Eileen et al. 2018 | 57 | 14% |
| Kataoka et al. 2018 | 140 | 14% |
| Fechner et al. 2022 | 1 | 14% |
| Cantoral et al. 2024 | 1 | 14% |
| Burgon 2023 | 3 | 14% |
| Marincich et al. 2023 | 1 | 14% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for dark chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for dark chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
- WHO GEMS/Food
- Eileen et al. 2018
- Kataoka et al. 2018
- Fechner et al. 2022
- Cantoral et al. 2024
- Burgon 2023
- Marincich et al. 2023
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-dark_chocolate-Cd:32087c34aad3
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI milk chocolate Cd reference · 8 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI milk chocolate Cd reference · 8 sampling families. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 16.3 | 19 | 23 |
| Alternative weighting | 16.3 | 19 | 23 |
124 reference units; 8 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 43 | 13% |
| FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | 1 | 13% |
| Eileen et al. 2018 | 40 | 13% |
| Kataoka et al. 2018 | 35 | 13% |
| Fechner et al. 2022 | 2 | 13% |
| FSANZ 23rd ATDS | 1 | 13% |
| FSANZ 25th ATDS | 1 | 13% |
| Marincich et al. 2023 | 1 | 13% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for milk chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for milk chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
- WHO GEMS/Food
- FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020
- Eileen et al. 2018
- Kataoka et al. 2018
- Fechner et al. 2022
- FSANZ 23rd ATDS
- FSANZ 25th ATDS
- Marincich et al. 2023
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-milk_chocolate-Cd:9dd1f7f095a9
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI white chocolate Cd reference · 3 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI white chocolate Cd reference · 3 sampling families. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.65 | ≤1 | 0.28–6 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.465 | ≤1 | 0.21–6 (bounded) |
20 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 14 | 33% |
| Kataoka et al. 2018 | 5 | 33% |
| Burgon 2023 | 1 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for white chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for white chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-white_chocolate-Cd:ae1462f0dd07
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chocolate, type not specified Cd reference · 4 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI chocolate, type not specified Cd reference · 4 sampling families. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 60 | 60 | 141 |
| Alternative weighting | 60 | 60 | 141 |
38 reference units; 4 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 27 | 25% |
| Cantoral et al. 2024 | 1 | 25% |
| As You Sow 2022 | 5 | 25% |
| Kataoka et al. 2018 | 5 | 25% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chocolate, type not specified from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for chocolate, type not specified, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-chocolate_unspecified-Cd:d038cb34b11b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI mixed cocoa and chocolate products Cd reference · 3 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI mixed cocoa and chocolate products Cd reference · 3 sampling families. Products as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 16 | 130 | 240 |
| Alternative weighting | 16 | 130 | 240 |
40 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 35 | 33% |
| UK TDS 2014 | 1 | 33% |
| Hands et al. 2024 | 4 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for mixed cocoa and chocolate products from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for mixed cocoa and chocolate products, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-mixed_products-Cd:69b6f7594b3a
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa beans and nibs Pb reference · 4 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa beans and nibs Pb reference · 4 sampling families. Beans or nibs, dry or as-received weight as reported (cocoa beans are dried to about 7% moisture), µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1.2–3.6 (bounded) | 17.5–25 (bounded) | 200 |
| Alternative weighting | 2–3.6 (bounded) | 17.5–25 (bounded) | 168 |
50 reference units; 4 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 14 | 25% |
| Eileen et al. 2018 | 5 | 25% |
| Ferreira et al. 2021 | 8 | 25% |
| As You Sow 2022 | 23 | 25% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa beans and nibs from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa beans and nibs, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-beans-Pb:98cfad15f251
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa bean shell Pb reference · 2 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa bean shell Pb reference · 2 sampling families. Shell (testa), dry weight as reported, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 142 | 142 | 329 |
| Alternative weighting | 142 | 142 | 329 |
26 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Ferreira et al. 2021 | 1 | 50% |
| As You Sow 2022 | 25 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa bean shell from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa bean shell, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-shell-Pb:607f94d00a33
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa liquor (mass) Pb reference · 3 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa liquor (mass) Pb reference · 3 sampling families. Cocoa liquor as produced, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤22 | 21–40 (bounded) | 70–80 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤22 | 21–40 (bounded) | 70–80 (bounded) |
22 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 10 | 33% |
| Ferreira et al. 2021 | 1 | 33% |
| As You Sow 2022 | 11 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa liquor (mass) from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa liquor (mass), not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-liquor-Pb:0d36c71ec04b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa butter Pb reference · 3 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa butter Pb reference · 3 sampling families. Cocoa butter as produced, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤10 | ≤22 | 10–30 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤10 | ≤22 | 10–30 (bounded) |
19 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 11 | 33% |
| Ferreira et al. 2021 | 1 | 33% |
| As You Sow 2022 | 7 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa butter from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa butter, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-butter-Pb:528d4c1e2f32
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa powder Pb reference · 6 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa powder Pb reference · 6 sampling families. Cocoa powder as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 30–40 (bounded) | 80–90 (bounded) | 113 |
| Alternative weighting | 30–40 (bounded) | 80–90 (bounded) | 113 |
73 reference units; 6 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 27 | 17% |
| FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | 1 | 17% |
| Eileen et al. 2018 | 38 | 17% |
| Fechner et al. 2022 | 1 | 17% |
| Ferreira et al. 2021 | 1 | 17% |
| As You Sow 2022 | 5 | 17% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa powder from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa powder, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
- WHO GEMS/Food
- FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020
- Eileen et al. 2018
- Fechner et al. 2022
- Ferreira et al. 2021
- As You Sow 2022
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-powder-Pb:2fdc8870b75f
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder Pb reference · 2 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder Pb reference · 2 sampling families. Powder as sold, before mixing into a drink, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 15.5 | 19.3 | 40.3–42.8 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | 15.5 | 19.3 | 40.3–42.8 (bounded) |
13 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 12 | 50% |
| Fechner et al. 2022 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-sweetened_powder-Pb:9cc6fa032abc
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI dark chocolate Pb reference · 5 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI dark chocolate Pb reference · 5 sampling families. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 29.5 | 36–38 (bounded) | 60–66 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | 29.5 | 36–39 (bounded) | 60–66 (bounded) |
81 reference units; 5 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 22 | 20% |
| Eileen et al. 2018 | 54 | 20% |
| Fechner et al. 2022 | 1 | 20% |
| Burgon 2023 | 3 | 20% |
| As You Sow 2022 | 1 | 20% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for dark chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for dark chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-dark_chocolate-Pb:841ec9d5da2d
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI milk chocolate Pb reference · 6 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI milk chocolate Pb reference · 6 sampling families. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 7 | 9.5 | 14–20 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | 7 | 9.5 | 14–20 (bounded) |
75 reference units; 6 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 38 | 17% |
| FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | 1 | 17% |
| Eileen et al. 2018 | 32 | 17% |
| Fechner et al. 2022 | 2 | 17% |
| FSANZ 23rd ATDS | 1 | 17% |
| FSANZ 25th ATDS | 1 | 17% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for milk chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for milk chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
- WHO GEMS/Food
- FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020
- Eileen et al. 2018
- Fechner et al. 2022
- FSANZ 23rd ATDS
- FSANZ 25th ATDS
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-milk_chocolate-Pb:1611f7c06948
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI white chocolate Pb reference · 2 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI white chocolate Pb reference · 2 sampling families. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤5 | ≤6 | ≤20 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤5 | ≤6 | ≤20 |
11 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 10 | 50% |
| Burgon 2023 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for white chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for white chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-white_chocolate-Pb:8c95f65aff31
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chocolate, type not specified Pb reference · 2 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI chocolate, type not specified Pb reference · 2 sampling families. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 13.6–20 (bounded) | 20–35.4 (bounded) | 50–67.5 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | 13.6–20 (bounded) | 20–35.4 (bounded) | 50–67.5 (bounded) |
40 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 28 | 50% |
| As You Sow 2022 | 12 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chocolate, type not specified from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for chocolate, type not specified, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-chocolate_unspecified-Pb:4485fec1958e
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI mixed cocoa and chocolate products Pb reference · 3 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI mixed cocoa and chocolate products Pb reference · 3 sampling families. Products as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 7 | 23–30 (bounded) | 55 |
| Alternative weighting | 7 | 23–30 (bounded) | 55 |
21 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 17 | 33% |
| UK TDS 2014 | 1 | 33% |
| Hands et al. 2024 | 3 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for mixed cocoa and chocolate products from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for mixed cocoa and chocolate products, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-mixed_products-Pb:4c21cb1f0494
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa powder Ni reference · 2 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa powder Ni reference · 2 sampling families. Cocoa powder as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 10600 | 10800 | 11100 |
| Alternative weighting | 10600 | 10800 | 11100 |
2 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | 1 | 50% |
| Fechner et al. 2022 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa powder from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa powder, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-powder-Ni:d19b14acb677
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder Ni reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder Ni reference · 1 sampling family. Powder as sold, before mixing into a drink, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 2150 | 2150 | 2150 |
| Alternative weighting | 2150 | 2150 | 2150 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Fechner et al. 2022 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-sweetened_powder-Ni:ac7b04d6eb5f
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI dark chocolate Ni reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI dark chocolate Ni reference · 1 sampling family. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 2800 | 2800 | 2800 |
| Alternative weighting | 2800 | 2800 | 2800 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Fechner et al. 2022 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for dark chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for dark chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-dark_chocolate-Ni:cdd9c7c5b22a
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI milk chocolate Ni reference · 2 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI milk chocolate Ni reference · 2 sampling families. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 763 | 873 | 920 |
| Alternative weighting | 763 | 873 | 920 |
3 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | 1 | 50% |
| Fechner et al. 2022 | 2 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for milk chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for milk chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-milk_chocolate-Ni:e6598a82d9e2
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI mixed cocoa and chocolate products Ni reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI mixed cocoa and chocolate products Ni reference · 1 sampling family. Products as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 610 | 610 | 610 |
| Alternative weighting | 610 | 610 | 610 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| UK TDS 2014 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for mixed cocoa and chocolate products from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for mixed cocoa and chocolate products, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-mixed_products-Ni:9c436118e5c5
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa beans and nibs tAs reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa beans and nibs tAs reference · 1 sampling family. Beans or nibs, dry or as-received weight as reported (cocoa beans are dried to about 7% moisture), µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤35 | ≤65 | 75–85 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤35 | ≤65 | 75–85 (bounded) |
14 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 14 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa beans and nibs from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa beans and nibs, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-beans-tAs:4e08669156b6
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa liquor (mass) tAs reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa liquor (mass) tAs reference · 1 sampling family. Cocoa liquor as produced, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤40 | ≤50 | 25–100 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤40 | ≤50 | 25–100 (bounded) |
13 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 13 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa liquor (mass) from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa liquor (mass), not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-liquor-tAs:698f78af2408
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa butter tAs reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa butter tAs reference · 1 sampling family. Cocoa butter as produced, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤20 | ≤30 | ≤50 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤20 | ≤30 | ≤50 |
3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 3 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa butter from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa butter, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-butter-tAs:409eb5128f27
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa powder tAs reference · 2 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa powder tAs reference · 2 sampling families. Cocoa powder as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 24–29 (bounded) | 29 | 29–50 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | 24–29 (bounded) | 29 | 29–50 (bounded) |
28 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 27 | 50% |
| FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa powder from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa powder, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-powder-tAs:872348f1002d
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder tAs reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder tAs reference · 1 sampling family. Powder as sold, before mixing into a drink, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤20 | ≤20.6 | ≤40 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤20 | ≤20.6 | ≤40 |
11 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 11 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-sweetened_powder-tAs:0880602e4347
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI dark chocolate tAs reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI dark chocolate tAs reference · 1 sampling family. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤20 | ≤38 | 11.4–52 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤20 | ≤38 | 11.4–52 (bounded) |
17 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 17 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for dark chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for dark chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-dark_chocolate-tAs:c81587dff74b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI milk chocolate tAs reference · 3 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI milk chocolate tAs reference · 3 sampling families. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 3.1 | 3.1–5 (bounded) | 10–25 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | 3.1 | 3.1–5 (bounded) | 10–25 (bounded) |
22 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 19 | 33% |
| FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | 1 | 33% |
| FSANZ 23rd ATDS | 2 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for milk chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for milk chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-milk_chocolate-tAs:13c542f322a3
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI white chocolate tAs reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI white chocolate tAs reference · 1 sampling family. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤37.5 | ≤38.5 | ≤50 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤37.5 | ≤38.5 | ≤50 |
6 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 6 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for white chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for white chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-white_chocolate-tAs:876f11905c27
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chocolate, type not specified tAs reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI chocolate, type not specified tAs reference · 1 sampling family. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤16.5 | ≤25.5 | 12.8–41.8 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤16.5 | ≤25.5 | 12.8–41.8 (bounded) |
20 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 20 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chocolate, type not specified from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for chocolate, type not specified, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-chocolate_unspecified-tAs:76bbc65406e6
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI mixed cocoa and chocolate products tAs reference · 3 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI mixed cocoa and chocolate products tAs reference · 3 sampling families. Products as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 5 | 7–30 (bounded) | 37–50 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | 5 | 7–30 (bounded) | 37–50 (bounded) |
14 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 11 | 33% |
| UK TDS 2014 | 1 | 33% |
| Hands et al. 2024 | 2 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for mixed cocoa and chocolate products from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for mixed cocoa and chocolate products, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-mixed_products-tAs:393bd01b393a
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa powder iAs reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa powder iAs reference · 1 sampling family. Cocoa powder as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤18.4 | ≤20 | 14–20 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤18.4 | ≤20 | 14–20 (bounded) |
6 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 6 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa powder from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa powder, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-powder-iAs:cd8a621ad15f
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder iAs reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder iAs reference · 1 sampling family. Powder as sold, before mixing into a drink, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤11.4 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤11.4 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
7 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 7 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-sweetened_powder-iAs:0268c7c78a1a
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI dark chocolate iAs reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI dark chocolate iAs reference · 1 sampling family. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤10 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤10 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
7 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 7 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for dark chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for dark chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-dark_chocolate-iAs:11dc9d17be8c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI milk chocolate iAs reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI milk chocolate iAs reference · 1 sampling family. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤10 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤10 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
5 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 5 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for milk chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for milk chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-milk_chocolate-iAs:497524191531
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI white chocolate iAs reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI white chocolate iAs reference · 1 sampling family. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for white chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for white chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-white_chocolate-iAs:887480f1e1f6
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chocolate, type not specified iAs reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI chocolate, type not specified iAs reference · 1 sampling family. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤6 | ≤20 | 6–20 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤6 | ≤20 | 6–20 (bounded) |
3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 3 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chocolate, type not specified from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for chocolate, type not specified, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-chocolate_unspecified-iAs:56e99e29ac1f
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI mixed cocoa and chocolate products iAs reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI mixed cocoa and chocolate products iAs reference · 1 sampling family. Products as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤12 | ≤12 | ≤12 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤12 | ≤12 | ≤12 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| UK TDS 2014 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for mixed cocoa and chocolate products from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for mixed cocoa and chocolate products, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-mixed_products-iAs:2e2e1174b3d9
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa powder DMA reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa powder DMA reference · 1 sampling family. Cocoa powder as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa powder from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa powder, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-powder-DMA:87ce97f5629c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI milk chocolate DMA reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI milk chocolate DMA reference · 1 sampling family. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for milk chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for milk chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-milk_chocolate-DMA:d7934d48e00e
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa beans and nibs tHg reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa beans and nibs tHg reference · 1 sampling family. Beans or nibs, dry or as-received weight as reported (cocoa beans are dried to about 7% moisture), µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤5 | ≤15 | 22 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤5 | ≤15 | 22 |
3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 3 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa beans and nibs from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa beans and nibs, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-beans-tHg:c1685b41d5b3
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa liquor (mass) tHg reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa liquor (mass) tHg reference · 1 sampling family. Cocoa liquor as produced, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤3 | ≤5.5 | 30–36.8 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤3 | ≤5.5 | 30–36.8 (bounded) |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa liquor (mass) from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa liquor (mass), not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-liquor-tHg:f169815dadde
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa butter tHg reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa butter tHg reference · 1 sampling family. Cocoa butter as produced, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤10 | ≤10 | ≤10 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤10 | ≤10 | ≤10 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa butter from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa butter, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-butter-tHg:4d04d8131c15
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa powder tHg reference · 3 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa powder tHg reference · 3 sampling families. Cocoa powder as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤3 | ≤4 | 15 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤3 | ≤4 | 15 |
16 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 14 | 33% |
| FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | 1 | 33% |
| Fechner et al. 2022 | 1 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa powder from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa powder, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-powder-tHg:f7ea49fae3fe
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder tHg reference · 2 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder tHg reference · 2 sampling families. Powder as sold, before mixing into a drink, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤3.33 | ≤3.33 | ≤10.5 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤3.33 | ≤3.33 | ≤10.5 |
7 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 6 | 50% |
| Fechner et al. 2022 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for sweetened cocoa or drinking-chocolate powder, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-sweetened_powder-tHg:bdcf31d0912e
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI dark chocolate tHg reference · 2 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI dark chocolate tHg reference · 2 sampling families. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤2.87 | ≤4.1 | 0.04–4.55 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤2.87 | ≤4.1 | 0.04–4.55 (bounded) |
15 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 14 | 50% |
| Fechner et al. 2022 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for dark chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for dark chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-dark_chocolate-tHg:15b8ca560e29
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI milk chocolate tHg reference · 4 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI milk chocolate tHg reference · 4 sampling families. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | ≤3.87 | 7.8 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | ≤3.87 | 7.8 |
15 reference units; 4 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 11 | 25% |
| FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | 1 | 25% |
| Fechner et al. 2022 | 2 | 25% |
| FSANZ 23rd ATDS | 1 | 25% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for milk chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for milk chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-milk_chocolate-tHg:4185153282ff
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI white chocolate tHg reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI white chocolate tHg reference · 1 sampling family. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤3 | ≤5 | ≤15 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤3 | ≤5 | ≤15 |
5 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 5 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for white chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for white chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-white_chocolate-tHg:43af8ff38867
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chocolate, type not specified tHg reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI chocolate, type not specified tHg reference · 1 sampling family. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤5 | 3.65–7.2 (bounded) | 38 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤5 | 3.65–7.2 (bounded) | 38 |
8 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 8 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chocolate, type not specified from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for chocolate, type not specified, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-chocolate_unspecified-tHg:9e374c7f3887
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI mixed cocoa and chocolate products tHg reference · 2 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI mixed cocoa and chocolate products tHg reference · 2 sampling families. Products as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.5 | ≤0.5 | ≤1.57 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.5 | ≤0.5 | ≤1.57 |
16 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 15 | 50% |
| UK TDS 2014 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for mixed cocoa and chocolate products from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for mixed cocoa and chocolate products, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-mixed_products-tHg:67b8c305396f
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa powder Cr reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa powder Cr reference · 1 sampling family. Cocoa powder as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 3700 | 3700 | 3700 |
| Alternative weighting | 3700 | 3700 | 3700 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa powder from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa powder, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-powder-Cr:b3bd90add018
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI milk chocolate Cr reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI milk chocolate Cr reference · 1 sampling family. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 500 | 500 | 500 |
| Alternative weighting | 500 | 500 | 500 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for milk chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for milk chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-milk_chocolate-Cr:1d73357e9cb7
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI mixed cocoa and chocolate products Cr reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI mixed cocoa and chocolate products Cr reference · 1 sampling family. Products as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Alternative weighting | 180 | 180 | 180 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| UK TDS 2014 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for mixed cocoa and chocolate products from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for mixed cocoa and chocolate products, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-mixed_products-Cr:6b07e60c3ffc
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa powder Al reference · 2 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa powder Al reference · 2 sampling families. Cocoa powder as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 130000 | 160000 | 160000 |
| Alternative weighting | 130000 | 160000 | 160000 |
12 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Fechner et al. 2019 | 11 | 50% |
| Stahl et al. 2017 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa powder from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa powder, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-powder-Al:af2e4e9b4c23
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI dark chocolate Al reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI dark chocolate Al reference · 1 sampling family. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 43400 | 48800 | 54100 |
| Alternative weighting | 43400 | 48800 | 54100 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for dark chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for dark chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-dark_chocolate-Al:d3056dc518a9
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI milk chocolate Al reference · 2 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI milk chocolate Al reference · 2 sampling families. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 3780 | 4100 | 7600 |
| Alternative weighting | 3780 | 4100 | 7600 |
3 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 50% |
| FSANZ 23rd ATDS | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for milk chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for milk chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-milk_chocolate-Al:db032cc6659d
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chocolate, type not specified Al reference · 2 sampling families
Reference and scope
HMI chocolate, type not specified Al reference · 2 sampling families. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 5800 | 22500 | 39000 |
| Alternative weighting | 5800 | 22500 | 39000 |
3 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 50% |
| Stahl et al. 2017 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chocolate, type not specified from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for chocolate, type not specified, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-chocolate_unspecified-Al:0075ef02e08f
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI mixed cocoa and chocolate products Al reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI mixed cocoa and chocolate products Al reference · 1 sampling family. Products as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 6040 | 6040 | 6040 |
| Alternative weighting | 6040 | 6040 | 6040 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| UK TDS 2014 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for mixed cocoa and chocolate products from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for mixed cocoa and chocolate products, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-mixed_products-Al:da13ce710029
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa powder Sn reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa powder Sn reference · 1 sampling family. Cocoa powder as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤60 | ≤60 | ≤60 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤60 | ≤60 | ≤60 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa powder from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa powder, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-powder-Sn:a4bff2a1a055
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI dark chocolate Sn reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI dark chocolate Sn reference · 1 sampling family. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 21.5 | 23.4 | 25.2 |
| Alternative weighting | 21.5 | 23.4 | 25.2 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for dark chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for dark chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-dark_chocolate-Sn:5c939585cdf6
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI milk chocolate Sn reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI milk chocolate Sn reference · 1 sampling family. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1.5 | 16.3–17.1 (bounded) | 32.6 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1.5 | 16.3–17.1 (bounded) | 32.6 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for milk chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for milk chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-milk_chocolate-Sn:41c858107d66
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chocolate, type not specified Sn reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI chocolate, type not specified Sn reference · 1 sampling family. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤8.67 | 8.67–9.07 (bounded) | 9.07–10 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤8.67 | 8.67–9.07 (bounded) | 9.07–10 (bounded) |
3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 3 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chocolate, type not specified from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for chocolate, type not specified, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-chocolate_unspecified-Sn:eaa9931c6449
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI mixed cocoa and chocolate products Sn reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI mixed cocoa and chocolate products Sn reference · 1 sampling family. Products as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤10 | ≤10 | ≤10 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤10 | ≤10 | ≤10 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| UK TDS 2014 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for mixed cocoa and chocolate products from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for mixed cocoa and chocolate products, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-mixed_products-Sn:78d66eb1f8c2
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cocoa powder U reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI cocoa powder U reference · 1 sampling family. Cocoa powder as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.9 |
| Alternative weighting | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.9 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cocoa powder from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for cocoa powder, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-powder-U:45f06645fa65
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI milk chocolate U reference · 1 sampling family
Reference and scope
HMI milk chocolate U reference · 1 sampling family. Chocolate as sold, µg/kg. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for milk chocolate from every compatible sampling family in the cocoa evidence ledger: WHO GEMS/Food region-by-year medians (random sampling, individual records only), FDA Total Diet Study composites where they exist, individual products or batches printed by surveys, and published subgroup medians. Each family has equal total weight; subgroups have equal weight within a family. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges, maxima and values quoted from other studies never enter as observations.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
An international evidence-library reference for milk chocolate, not a probability sample of any market. GEMS/Food regions are reporting regions, not growing origins. Many submissions are non-detects with differing limits, which widens the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cocoa-milk_chocolate-U:05f34cbff98c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
The source reports only a percentile, range or maximum for these samples, with no mean or median to place against the reference. Spread figures that do have a mean or median are shown on that row instead.
The value could not be reconciled with its own paper, so it is shown but not compared.
The result is below a reporting limit, and the range from zero to that limit crosses more than one band.
No medians or sample values exist for this form and metal, so no HMI reference could be built.
The HMI reference for this form has fewer than four units or no measurable spread, below the display minimum.
Reporting limits overlap the study comparison, so no direction can be shown.
No findings match these filters. Change the selection or reset to show all source findings.
How metals reach cocoa
Cadmium enters the bean from the soil through the roots, and soil conditions explain much of the difference between farms.6Drivers of cadmium accumulation in Theobroma cacao L. beans: A quantitative synthesis of soil-plant relationships across the Cacao BeltPLOS ONERead source →21Relationships between cadmium in tissues of cacao trees and soils in plantations of Trinidad and TobagoFood and Nutrition SciencesRead source → A synthesis of studies across the cacao belt ranked total soil cadmium and soil pH as the strongest predictors of bean cadmium, and its model lowered bean cadmium from about 1.65 to 1.0–1.1 mg/kg as soil pH rose from 5 to about 7.6Drivers of cadmium accumulation in Theobroma cacao L. beans: A quantitative synthesis of soil-plant relationships across the Cacao BeltPLOS ONERead source → In Trinidad, nib cadmium tracked leaf cadmium closely (r = 0.79) but total soil cadmium only weakly (r = 0.35).21Relationships between cadmium in tissues of cacao trees and soils in plantations of Trinidad and TobagoFood and Nutrition SciencesRead source →
Within the tree, cadmium reaching the nib travels mainly through the branches rather than from the leaves.22From soil to cacao bean: Unravelling the pathways of cadmium translocation in a high Cd accumulating cultivar of Theobroma cacao L.Frontiers in Plant ScienceRead source → In a high-accumulating cultivar at the Trinidad genebank, nibs averaged 2,050 µg/kg, and in Peru two nearby Piura sites differed tenfold, at 7.12 and 0.72 mg/kg, with flood-plain soils transferring cadmium to beans about 3.5 times more readily.23The distribution of cadmium in soil and cacao beans in PeruScience of the Total EnvironmentRead source →22From soil to cacao bean: Unravelling the pathways of cadmium translocation in a high Cd accumulating cultivar of Theobroma cacao L.Frontiers in Plant ScienceRead source →
Lead mostly arrives on the outside of the bean after harvest, through soil and dust during fermentation, drying, transport and storage.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →8Perspective on Cadmium and Lead in Cocoa and ChocolateJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistryRead source → In a factory study, separated shells held 163 µg/kg lead and nibs 15.2 µg/kg, cleaning lowered whole-bean lead from 95.2 to 39.7 µg/kg, and dust collected from the cleaners carried 2,370–3,130 µg/kg.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source → The same investigation attributed about 70% of the lead in nibs to contact during bean breaking and winnowing.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →
Aluminium and nickel follow the cocoa solids as well. German monitoring found a mean of 146 mg/kg aluminium in cocoa powder, and data compiled by a German state laboratory gave medians of 160 mg/kg in powder and 39 mg/kg in chocolate.24Dietary exposure assessment of aluminium and cadmium from cocoa in relation to cocoa originPLoS ONERead source →25Migration of aluminum from food contact materials to food - a health risk for consumers? Part I of III: exposure to aluminum, release of aluminum, tolerable weekly intake (TWI), toxicological effects of aluminum, study design, and methodsEnvironmental Sciences EuropeRead source →
Which origins and products measured lower
For cadmium, West African beans are consistently the lowest measured.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →9Cadmium: dietary exposure assessmentWHO Food Additives Series, No. 82 (Safety evaluation of certain contaminants in food, prepared by the 91st meeting of JECFA)Read source → Industry bean testing gave medians of 55 µg/kg for Nigeria, 60 µg/kg for Côte d’Ivoire, 70 µg/kg for Ghana and 90 µg/kg for Cameroon, against 246 µg/kg for the Dominican Republic, 359 µg/kg for Indonesia, 511 µg/kg for Ecuador and 542 µg/kg for Peru.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source → In the international assessment, cocoa powder averaged 141 µg/kg in the mainly African cluster, 609 µg/kg in Indonesia and 1,601 µg/kg in the mainly South and Central American cluster, and cocoa liquor showed the same order.9Cadmium: dietary exposure assessmentWHO Food Additives Series, No. 82 (Safety evaluation of certain contaminants in food, prepared by the 91st meeting of JECFA)Read source → In the US retail survey, products of Latin American origin had higher cadmium than those of African origin after allowing for cocoa content.1Cadmium and Lead in Cocoa Powder and Chocolate Products in the U.S. MarketFood Additives & Contaminants: Part B SurveillanceRead source →
Within producing countries the range is wide, so a country name alone does not settle a lot. Peruvian regional bean means ran from 0.17 mg/kg in Cuzco to 1.78 mg/kg in Tumbes, although the authors found the regional differences not statistically significant.16Heavy metal accumulation in leaves and beans of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) in major cacao growing regions in PeruScience of the Total EnvironmentRead source → A nationwide survey of 560 trees on 159 Ecuadorian farms in 2017 found cadmium in peeled, unfermented beans from 0.03 to 10.4 mg/kg dry weight, with a geometric mean of 0.55 mg/kg.44Soil properties and agronomic factors affecting cadmium concentrations in cacao beans: A nationwide survey in EcuadorScience of The Total EnvironmentRead source → Ecuadorian province means ran from about 0.3 mg/kg in Napo to about 1.7 mg/kg in Guayas, and Brazilian beans averaged 60 µg/kg from Bahia but 129 µg/kg from Pará and 1,153 µg/kg in four Ecuadorian samples in the same study.10Cd and Pb in cocoa beans: Occurrence and effects of chocolate processingFood Control 119, 107455Read source →20Content and the relationship between cadmium, nickel, and lead concentrations in Ecuadorian cocoa beans from nine provincesFood ControlRead source → Genotype also matters: in Peru the native Chuncho type averaged 0.17 mg/kg against 0.90 mg/kg for CCN 51 and 1.80 mg/kg for spontaneous hybrids.16Heavy metal accumulation in leaves and beans of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) in major cacao growing regions in PeruScience of the Total EnvironmentRead source →
For lead, the lowest results do not come from the low-cadmium origins. Industry bean medians for lead were 5–10 µg/kg for the Dominican Republic, Ecuador and Peru and 25 µg/kg for Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria and Cameroon.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source → In Brazil, the four Ecuadorian bean samples had the highest cadmium and the lowest lead in the study.10Cd and Pb in cocoa beans: Occurrence and effects of chocolate processingFood Control 119, 107455Read source → Because lead depends on post-harvest handling, the useful comparison for lead is between handling and cleaning practices, not between countries.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →
Among products, milk and white chocolate are the lowest for both metals because they hold the least cocoa.1Cadmium and Lead in Cocoa Powder and Chocolate Products in the U.S. MarketFood Additives & Contaminants: Part B SurveillanceRead source →2Surveillance of Cadmium Concentration in Chocolate and Cocoa Powder Products Distributed in JapanFood Hygiene and Safety ScienceRead source →5GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Milk chocolate averaged 60 µg/kg cadmium and 10 µg/kg lead in the US survey, against 270 and 30 µg/kg in dark chocolate and 700 and 110 µg/kg in cocoa powder, and white chocolate cadmium was near or below detection.1Cadmium and Lead in Cocoa Powder and Chocolate Products in the U.S. MarketFood Additives & Contaminants: Part B SurveillanceRead source →2Surveillance of Cadmium Concentration in Chocolate and Cocoa Powder Products Distributed in JapanFood Hygiene and Safety ScienceRead source →5GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Organic labelling did not mean lower cadmium: certified-organic products averaged about 400 µg/kg more cadmium in a multi-year US analysis, and a German organic milk chocolate pool held 56 µg/kg against 16 µg/kg for the conventional pool.26A multi-year heavy metal analysis of 72 dark chocolate and cocoa products in the USAFrontiers in NutritionRead source →17Results of the BfR MEAL Study: In Germany, mercury is mostly contained in fish and seafood while cadmium, lead, and nickel are present in a broad spectrum of foodsFood Chemistry: XRead source →
For nickel, which the EU has limited in chocolate and cocoa powder since July 2025, the supported comparison is between products rather than origins.27Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/1987 of 30 July 2024 amending Regulation (EU) 2023/915 as regards maximum levels of nickel in certain foodstuffsOfficial Journal of the European Union, L series, 2024/1987 (31.7.2024)Read source → Milk chocolate measured 700–1,000 µg/kg in German and US total diet samples, against 2,800 µg/kg in dark chocolate and 10,600–11,050 µg/kg in cocoa powder.14FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →17Results of the BfR MEAL Study: In Germany, mercury is mostly contained in fish and seafood while cadmium, lead, and nickel are present in a broad spectrum of foodsFood Chemistry: XRead source → The only origin data, from one Peruvian survey, put regional bean means between about 3.5 and 9.3 mg/kg, read from a figure and without detection limits, which is too weak to rank origins for nickel.16Heavy metal accumulation in leaves and beans of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) in major cacao growing regions in PeruScience of the Total EnvironmentRead source →
Which cocoa origins measured lowest in cadmium?
Beans from Nigeria, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana and Cameroon had median cadmium of 55–90 µg/kg in industry testing, and Brazilian beans 94 µg/kg.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source → Within Brazil, Bahia beans averaged 60 µg/kg, and within Peru, Cuzco beans averaged 0.17 mg/kg.16Heavy metal accumulation in leaves and beans of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) in major cacao growing regions in PeruScience of the Total EnvironmentRead source →10Cd and Pb in cocoa beans: Occurrence and effects of chocolate processingFood Control 119, 107455Read source → These are observed values for one metal; they do not make those origins lower in lead.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →
Which chocolate types have the least cadmium?
Milk chocolate and white chocolate, because cadmium follows the nonfat cocoa solids.1Cadmium and Lead in Cocoa Powder and Chocolate Products in the U.S. MarketFood Additives & Contaminants: Part B SurveillanceRead source →2Surveillance of Cadmium Concentration in Chocolate and Cocoa Powder Products Distributed in JapanFood Hygiene and Safety ScienceRead source → In Japan, milk chocolate had a median of 23 µg/kg and dark chocolate 150 µg/kg, and white chocolate was near the detection limit.2Surveillance of Cadmium Concentration in Chocolate and Cocoa Powder Products Distributed in JapanFood Hygiene and Safety ScienceRead source →
Processing, fermentation and shelling
Processing redistributes metals between fractions rather than removing them.10Cd and Pb in cocoa beans: Occurrence and effects of chocolate processingFood Control 119, 107455Read source → In the Bahia pilot run, about 59% of the cadmium stayed in the mill residue, 35% went to the liquor and 6% to the shell, and pressing sent all of the liquor’s cadmium into the cake and none into the butter.10Cd and Pb in cocoa beans: Occurrence and effects of chocolate processingFood Control 119, 107455Read source → That is why cocoa powder, the defatted solids, is the most concentrated retail form, while cocoa butter is low.10Cd and Pb in cocoa beans: Occurrence and effects of chocolate processingFood Control 119, 107455Read source →9Cadmium: dietary exposure assessmentWHO Food Additives Series, No. 82 (Safety evaluation of certain contaminants in food, prepared by the 91st meeting of JECFA)Read source →
For lead, cleaning and shelling are the steps with measured effects.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source → Mechanical cleaning lowered whole-bean lead from 95.2 to 39.7 µg/kg, and adding a detergent and acid wash lowered it to 23.2 µg/kg.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source → After winnowing, the fine nib fractions carried up to 143 µg/kg lead against about 15–20 µg/kg in the coarse fractions, so screening out fines is a further lever.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →
Fermentation has only small tested effects on cadmium. Adding Rhizobium japonicum to the fermenting mass lowered Trinitario bean cadmium from 0.36 to 0.29–0.30 mg/kg but barely changed Nacional beans (0.34–0.35 mg/kg).28Induction of rhizobium japonicum in the fermentative mass of two varieties of cacao (Theobroma Cacao L.) as a strategy for the decrease of cadmiumInternational Journal of Health SciencesRead source → A review notes that cadmium can move from nib to shell when fermentation drives nib pH below 5, which is a mechanism rather than a validated control.8Perspective on Cadmium and Lead in Cocoa and ChocolateJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistryRead source →
Does cocoa butter contain heavy metals?
Very little cadmium: in the Brazilian pilot run, butter was below 1.5 µg/kg while the powder from the same batch held 111 µg/kg.10Cd and Pb in cocoa beans: Occurrence and effects of chocolate processingFood Control 119, 107455Read source → International data put the global median for cocoa butter at 20 µg/kg cadmium.9Cadmium: dietary exposure assessmentWHO Food Additives Series, No. 82 (Safety evaluation of certain contaminants in food, prepared by the 91st meeting of JECFA)Read source →
Mitigation from farm to factory
Controls for cocoa act at the farm, during post-harvest handling, in the factory and at lot acceptance.13Code of Practice for the Prevention and Reduction of Cadmium Contamination in Cocoa Beans (CXC 81-2022)FAO and WHO, 2023. Codex Alimentarius Code of Practice No. CXC 81-2022. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme. Rome.Read source → The Codex code of practice recommends soil testing, liming toward pH 6 or above (for example 3 t/ha/year of dolomite), avoiding cadmium-rich fertilisers, applying zinc and using low-cadmium planting material, but it reports no measured effect sizes.13Code of Practice for the Prevention and Reduction of Cadmium Contamination in Cocoa Beans (CXC 81-2022)FAO and WHO, 2023. Codex Alimentarius Code of Practice No. CXC 81-2022. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme. Rome.Read source →
The field evidence for cadmium is limited but measurable. In a Peruvian field trial, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi lowered bean cadmium from 0.94 to 0.56 mg/kg, while biochar at 1–2% had smaller effects.29Mitigation of Cadmium Accumulation in Cocoa Beans Using Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi, Biochar and Callisia repensFolia AmazónicaRead source → In a greenhouse trial, quinoa biochar at 2% cut seedling leaf cadmium by 15–54% depending on soil, but beans were not measured.30Reducing cadmium bioaccumulation in Theobroma cacao using biochar: basis for scaling-up to fieldHeliyonRead source → Compost changed soil cadmium fractions in Ecuador, but the bean results were not printed.31Cadmium fractionation in soils affected by organic matter application: Transfer of cadmium to cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) tissuesFrontiers in Environmental ScienceRead source →
Lead controls are about cleanliness after harvest: drying beans off the ground, cleaning, removing shells and dust, and keeping equipment free of lead.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →13Code of Practice for the Prevention and Reduction of Cadmium Contamination in Cocoa Beans (CXC 81-2022)FAO and WHO, 2023. Codex Alimentarius Code of Practice No. CXC 81-2022. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme. Rome.Read source → Testing detects contamination and supports exclusion or blending, but it does not remove metals.9Cadmium: dietary exposure assessmentWHO Food Additives Series, No. 82 (Safety evaluation of certain contaminants in food, prepared by the 91st meeting of JECFA)Read source →32Cadmium in Cacao from Latin America and the Caribbean: A Review of Research and Potential Mitigation SolutionsBioversity International / CAF Development Bank of Latin AmericaRead source →
Filter findings
14 control comparisons
About this table
| Control | Material | Effects | Evidence | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raise soil pH by liming where soils are acidicsoil remediation · As reported | Cocoa | Cd · Context | GuidanceCodex CXC 81-2022 HMI source record · Original source Official guidance; not an independent experimental dataset. Reused across actions without adding studies. Effects and comparators CadmiumGuidance; effect not measuredBean cadmiumLimed versus unlimed acidic soilsCocoa beansContext · No supported numerical treatment contrast is retained for this finding. A direction, market association, source-selection strategy or guidance statement alone does not establish a percentage change. Guidance; no measured comparison in the code. How magnitude is classified HMI editorial magnitude bands: Low is a change greater than 0% and below 25%; Moderate is 25% to below 50%; High is 50% or more, relative to that control’s own comparator. Direction is shown separately. These are descriptive display bands, not validated efficacy cutoffs, occurrence-baseline positions, statistical significance, evidence certainty, safety or net benefit. A range spanning bands retains both labels; a qualitative label has no implied percentage. Control in context The code recommends liming toward pH 6 or above, for example 3 t/ha/year of dolomitic lime, and calls liming the most effective method found to date; no effect size is given.
Design, applicability and operating conditions Official or author guidance. Acidic cadmium-bearing soils. One study family. As reported by the source Reduces metal reaching the bean or product, or detects it before release. Source measurements and linked outcomes
No quantified effect in the code itself. No percentage calculated unless shown in outcomes. Not applicable unless stated. Trade-offs and implementation Not assessed. Not assessed. Not assessed. Not quantified. Not assessed. Applicability and verification Acidic cadmium-bearing soils. Lot testing. See source. Extraction limits and next actions
Provenance and assessment As disclosed by the source. Source facts and HMI calculations are distinguished above. These selected source findings do not constitute a systematic review; outcome-level appraisal remains incomplete. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Target soil pH and total soil cadmium when siting and managing farmssoil remediation · As reported | Cocoa | Cd · Decreased | 1Wade et al. 2022 HMI source record · Original source One dataset family. Linked analytes, repeated seasons and reports are not independent studies. Effects and comparators CadmiumDecreasedLower modelled bean Cd at higher soil pHModelled bean cadmium (dry matter)Soil pH 5 versus about 7Cocoa beansModerate · HMI calculates the relative change from the retained source means: (1050 − 1650) / 1650 × 100 = -36.4%. This is a descriptive contrast of means; no confidence interval or significance test is inferred. Modelled bean cadmium at soil pH 5 versus about 7. How magnitude is classified HMI editorial magnitude bands: Low is a change greater than 0% and below 25%; Moderate is 25% to below 50%; High is 50% or more, relative to that control’s own comparator. Direction is shown separately. These are descriptive display bands, not validated efficacy cutoffs, occurrence-baseline positions, statistical significance, evidence certainty, safety or net benefit. A range spanning bands retains both labels; a qualitative label has no implied percentage. Control in context In a model fitted to 892 compiled bean results, bean cadmium fell from about 1.65 to 1.0–1.1 mg/kg as soil pH rose from 5 to about 7; total soil cadmium and pH were the strongest predictors.
Design, applicability and operating conditions Statistical model of compiled data. Farms across Latin America and Africa represented in the compiled studies. One study family. As reported by the source Reduces metal reaching the bean or product, or detects it before release. Source measurements and linked outcomes
Model of observational data; not a liming trial. No percentage calculated unless shown in outcomes. Not applicable unless stated. Trade-offs and implementation Not assessed. Not assessed. Not assessed. Not quantified. Not assessed. Applicability and verification Farms across Latin America and Africa represented in the compiled studies. Lot testing. See source. Extraction limits and next actions
Provenance and assessment As disclosed by the source. Source facts and HMI calculations are distinguished above. These selected source findings do not constitute a systematic review; outcome-level appraisal remains incomplete. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inoculate trees with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungicultivation · As reported | Cocoa | Cd · Decreased Cd · Decreased | 1Vega-Jara et al. 2025 HMI source record · Original source One dataset family. Linked analytes, repeated seasons and reports are not independent studies. Effects and comparators CadmiumDecreasedLower bean Cd with fungiMean bean cadmiumFungi versus controlCocoa beansModerate · HMI calculates the relative change from the retained source means: (560 − 940) / 940 × 100 = -40.4%. This is a descriptive contrast of means; no confidence interval or significance test is inferred. CadmiumDecreasedSmall reduction with 1% biochar (figure estimate)Mean bean cadmiumBiochar 1% versus controlCocoa beansLow · HMI calculates the relative change from the retained source means: (810 − 940) / 940 × 100 = -13.8%. This is a descriptive contrast of means; no confidence interval or significance test is inferred. Untreated control trees in the same plot. How magnitude is classified HMI editorial magnitude bands: Low is a change greater than 0% and below 25%; Moderate is 25% to below 50%; High is 50% or more, relative to that control’s own comparator. Direction is shown separately. These are descriptive display bands, not validated efficacy cutoffs, occurrence-baseline positions, statistical significance, evidence certainty, safety or net benefit. A range spanning bands retains both labels; a qualitative label has no implied percentage. Control in context Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi lowered mean bean cadmium from 0.94 to 0.56 mg/kg; Callisia repens, the combination, and biochar at 1–2% had smaller effects.
Design, applicability and operating conditions Measured comparison. One site; 18 trees; one season. One study family. As reported by the source Reduces metal reaching the bean or product, or detects it before release. Source measurements and linked outcomes
Small trial; some figure readings; significance letters inconsistent with text. No percentage calculated unless shown in outcomes. Not applicable unless stated. Trade-offs and implementation Not assessed. Not assessed. Not assessed. Not quantified. Not assessed. Applicability and verification One site; 18 trees; one season. Lot testing. See source. Extraction limits and next actions
Provenance and assessment As disclosed by the source. Source facts and HMI calculations are distinguished above. These selected source findings do not constitute a systematic review; outcome-level appraisal remains incomplete. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Add biochar to cadmium-bearing soilssoil remediation · As reported | Cocoa | Cd · Decreased Cd · Decreased | 1López et al. 2022 HMI source record · Original source One dataset family. Linked analytes, repeated seasons and reports are not independent studies. Effects and comparators CadmiumDecreasedLower leaf Cd (seedlings)Leaf cadmiumBiochar 2% versus control, Cd-spiked soilSeedling leavesHigh · HMI calculates the relative change from the retained source means: (6400 − 13900) / 13900 × 100 = -54.0%. This is a descriptive contrast of means; no confidence interval or significance test is inferred. CadmiumDecreasedNot statistically significantLeaf cadmiumBiochar 2% versus control, acidic soilSeedling leavesModerate · HMI calculates the relative change from the retained source means: (1800 − 2900) / 2900 × 100 = -37.9%. This is a descriptive contrast of means; no confidence interval or significance test is inferred. Same soils without biochar. How magnitude is classified HMI editorial magnitude bands: Low is a change greater than 0% and below 25%; Moderate is 25% to below 50%; High is 50% or more, relative to that control’s own comparator. Direction is shown separately. These are descriptive display bands, not validated efficacy cutoffs, occurrence-baseline positions, statistical significance, evidence certainty, safety or net benefit. A range spanning bands retains both labels; a qualitative label has no implied percentage. Control in context Quinoa biochar at 2% cut seedling leaf cadmium by 15–54% depending on soil and lowered readily soluble soil cadmium by 71–78%; beans were not measured.
Design, applicability and operating conditions Measured comparison. Greenhouse pots; young plants. One study family. As reported by the source Reduces metal reaching the bean or product, or detects it before release. Source measurements and linked outcomes
Leaf endpoint only; transfer to beans untested. No percentage calculated unless shown in outcomes. Not applicable unless stated. Trade-offs and implementation Not assessed. Not assessed. Not assessed. Not quantified. Not assessed. Applicability and verification Greenhouse pots; young plants. Lot testing. See source. Extraction limits and next actions
Provenance and assessment As disclosed by the source. Source facts and HMI calculations are distinguished above. These selected source findings do not constitute a systematic review; outcome-level appraisal remains incomplete. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Apply compost to shift soil cadmium into bound formssoil remediation · As reported | Cocoa | Cd · Context | 1Gutiérrez et al. 2022 HMI source record · Original source One dataset family. Linked analytes, repeated seasons and reports are not independent studies. Effects and comparators CadmiumSoil fractions changed; bean effect not reportedSoil cadmium fractionsCompost versus noneSoilContext · No supported numerical treatment contrast is retained for this finding. A direction, market association, source-selection strategy or guidance statement alone does not establish a percentage change. Same farms without compost. How magnitude is classified HMI editorial magnitude bands: Low is a change greater than 0% and below 25%; Moderate is 25% to below 50%; High is 50% or more, relative to that control’s own comparator. Direction is shown separately. These are descriptive display bands, not validated efficacy cutoffs, occurrence-baseline positions, statistical significance, evidence certainty, safety or net benefit. A range spanning bands retains both labels; a qualitative label has no implied percentage. Control in context Compost changed the humic- and fulvic-acid-bound soil cadmium fractions; bean cadmium was measured but not printed by farm or treatment.
Design, applicability and operating conditions Measured comparison. Ecuadorian farms; one season. One study family. As reported by the source Reduces metal reaching the bean or product, or detects it before release. Source measurements and linked outcomes
No published bean outcome. No percentage calculated unless shown in outcomes. Not applicable unless stated. Trade-offs and implementation Not assessed. Not assessed. Not assessed. Not quantified. Not assessed. Applicability and verification Ecuadorian farms; one season. Lot testing. See source. Extraction limits and next actions
Provenance and assessment As disclosed by the source. Source facts and HMI calculations are distinguished above. These selected source findings do not constitute a systematic review; outcome-level appraisal remains incomplete. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Prefer low-cadmium genotypes where availablecultivation · As reported | Cocoa | Cd · Decreased | 1Arévalo-Gardini et al. 2017 HMI source record · Original source One dataset family. Linked analytes, repeated seasons and reports are not independent studies. Effects and comparators CadmiumDecreasedLower Cd in Chuncho (observational)Mean bean cadmium (dry weight)CCN 51 versus ChunchoCocoa beansHigh · HMI calculates the relative change from the retained source means: (170 − 900) / 900 × 100 = -81.1%. This is a descriptive contrast of means; no confidence interval or significance test is inferred. Genotypes grown in different regions; not a common-garden trial. How magnitude is classified HMI editorial magnitude bands: Low is a change greater than 0% and below 25%; Moderate is 25% to below 50%; High is 50% or more, relative to that control’s own comparator. Direction is shown separately. These are descriptive display bands, not validated efficacy cutoffs, occurrence-baseline positions, statistical significance, evidence certainty, safety or net benefit. A range spanning bands retains both labels; a qualitative label has no implied percentage. Control in context The native Chuncho type averaged 0.17 mg/kg bean cadmium against 0.90 mg/kg for CCN 51 and 1.80 mg/kg for spontaneous hybrids.
Design, applicability and operating conditions Observational comparison. Peru, 2014. One study family. As reported by the source Reduces metal reaching the bean or product, or detects it before release. Source measurements and linked outcomes
Genotype and region confounded. No percentage calculated unless shown in outcomes. Not applicable unless stated. Trade-offs and implementation Not assessed. Not assessed. Not assessed. Not quantified. Not assessed. Applicability and verification Peru, 2014. Lot testing. See source. Extraction limits and next actions
Provenance and assessment As disclosed by the source. Source facts and HMI calculations are distinguished above. These selected source findings do not constitute a systematic review; outcome-level appraisal remains incomplete. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Add Rhizobium japonicum during fermentationharvest and collection · As reported | Cocoa | Cd · Decreased Cd · Decreased | 1Chang et al. 2022 HMI source record · Original source One dataset family. Linked analytes, repeated seasons and reports are not independent studies. Effects and comparators CadmiumDecreasedSmall reduction (Trinitario)Bean cadmium5% inoculum versus controlCocoa beansLow · HMI calculates the relative change from the retained source means: (290 − 360) / 360 × 100 = -19.4%. This is a descriptive contrast of means; no confidence interval or significance test is inferred. CadmiumDecreasedNo meaningful change (Nacional)Bean cadmium5% inoculum versus controlCocoa beansLow · HMI calculates the relative change from the retained source means: (350 − 360) / 360 × 100 = -2.8%. This is a descriptive contrast of means; no confidence interval or significance test is inferred. Uninoculated fermentation of the same beans. How magnitude is classified HMI editorial magnitude bands: Low is a change greater than 0% and below 25%; Moderate is 25% to below 50%; High is 50% or more, relative to that control’s own comparator. Direction is shown separately. These are descriptive display bands, not validated efficacy cutoffs, occurrence-baseline positions, statistical significance, evidence certainty, safety or net benefit. A range spanning bands retains both labels; a qualitative label has no implied percentage. Control in context At 3–5% inoculum, Trinitario bean cadmium fell from 0.36 to 0.29–0.30 mg/kg; Nacional beans barely changed (0.34–0.35 mg/kg).
Design, applicability and operating conditions Measured comparison. One fermentation trial; two varieties. One study family. As reported by the source Reduces metal reaching the bean or product, or detects it before release. Source measurements and linked outcomes
No SD or significance test reported. No percentage calculated unless shown in outcomes. Not applicable unless stated. Trade-offs and implementation Not assessed. Not assessed. Not assessed. Not quantified. Not assessed. Applicability and verification One fermentation trial; two varieties. Lot testing. See source. Extraction limits and next actions
Provenance and assessment As disclosed by the source. Source facts and HMI calculations are distinguished above. These selected source findings do not constitute a systematic review; outcome-level appraisal remains incomplete. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Clean beans before breakingfood processing · As reported | Cocoa | Pb · Decreased Pb · Decreased | 1As You Sow 2022 HMI source record · Original source One dataset family. Linked analytes, repeated seasons and reports are not independent studies. Effects and comparators LeadDecreasedLower bean Pb after mechanical cleaningWhole-bean leadCleaned versus receivedCocoa beansHigh · HMI calculates the relative change from the retained source means: (39.7 − 95.2) / 95.2 × 100 = -58.3%. This is a descriptive contrast of means; no confidence interval or significance test is inferred. LeadDecreasedLower bean Pb after detergent and acid washWhole-bean leadWashed versus receivedCocoa beansHigh · HMI calculates the relative change from the retained source means: (23.2 − 95.2) / 95.2 × 100 = -75.6%. This is a descriptive contrast of means; no confidence interval or significance test is inferred. Received beans before cleaning. How magnitude is classified HMI editorial magnitude bands: Low is a change greater than 0% and below 25%; Moderate is 25% to below 50%; High is 50% or more, relative to that control’s own comparator. Direction is shown separately. These are descriptive display bands, not validated efficacy cutoffs, occurrence-baseline positions, statistical significance, evidence certainty, safety or net benefit. A range spanning bands retains both labels; a qualitative label has no implied percentage. Control in context Mechanical cleaning lowered whole-bean lead from 95.2 to 39.7 µg/kg, and a detergent and acid wash lowered it to 23.2 µg/kg; cleaner dust held 2,370–3,130 µg/kg.
Design, applicability and operating conditions Measured comparison. One factory; one bean lot; August 2020. One study family. As reported by the source Reduces metal reaching the bean or product, or detects it before release. Source measurements and linked outcomes
Single factory study. No percentage calculated unless shown in outcomes. Not applicable unless stated. Trade-offs and implementation Not assessed. Not assessed. Not assessed. Not quantified. Not assessed. Applicability and verification One factory; one bean lot; August 2020. Lot testing. See source. Extraction limits and next actions
Provenance and assessment As disclosed by the source. Source facts and HMI calculations are distinguished above. These selected source findings do not constitute a systematic review; outcome-level appraisal remains incomplete. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Remove shells and nib fines thoroughlyfood processing · As reported | Cocoa | Pb · Decreased Pb · Decreased | 1As You Sow 2022 HMI source record · Original source One dataset family. Linked analytes, repeated seasons and reports are not independent studies. Effects and comparators LeadDecreasedLower Pb in nib than shellLead by fractionShell versus nibCocoa beansHigh · HMI calculates the relative change from the retained source means: (15.2 − 163) / 163 × 100 = -90.7%. This is a descriptive contrast of means; no confidence interval or significance test is inferred. LeadDecreasedLower Pb in coarse nib fractionsNib lead by particle sizeFines versus coarseCocoa beansHigh · HMI calculates the relative change from the retained source means: (17.5 − 143) / 143 × 100 = -87.8%. This is a descriptive contrast of means; no confidence interval or significance test is inferred. Shell versus nib, and fine versus coarse nib fractions. How magnitude is classified HMI editorial magnitude bands: Low is a change greater than 0% and below 25%; Moderate is 25% to below 50%; High is 50% or more, relative to that control’s own comparator. Direction is shown separately. These are descriptive display bands, not validated efficacy cutoffs, occurrence-baseline positions, statistical significance, evidence certainty, safety or net benefit. A range spanning bands retains both labels; a qualitative label has no implied percentage. Control in context Separated shells held 163 µg/kg lead against 15.2 µg/kg in nibs; after winnowing, the fine nib fraction carried up to 143 µg/kg against about 15–20 µg/kg in coarse fractions.
Design, applicability and operating conditions Measured comparison. One factory study. One study family. As reported by the source Reduces metal reaching the bean or product, or detects it before release. Source measurements and linked outcomes
Single study. No percentage calculated unless shown in outcomes. Not applicable unless stated. Trade-offs and implementation Not assessed. Not assessed. Not assessed. Not quantified. Not assessed. Applicability and verification One factory study. Lot testing. See source. Extraction limits and next actions
Provenance and assessment As disclosed by the source. Source facts and HMI calculations are distinguished above. These selected source findings do not constitute a systematic review; outcome-level appraisal remains incomplete. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recognise that pressing concentrates cadmium in powderfood processing · As reported | Cocoa | Cd · Increased | 1Ferreira de Oliveira et al. 2021 HMI source record · Original source One dataset family. Linked analytes, repeated seasons and reports are not independent studies. Effects and comparators CadmiumIncreasedCd concentrates in powderCadmium by fractionLiquor versus powderCocoa productsHigh · HMI calculates the relative change from the retained source means: (111 − 60) / 60 × 100 = 85.0%. This is a descriptive contrast of means; no confidence interval or significance test is inferred. Liquor versus its butter and powder fractions. How magnitude is classified HMI editorial magnitude bands: Low is a change greater than 0% and below 25%; Moderate is 25% to below 50%; High is 50% or more, relative to that control’s own comparator. Direction is shown separately. These are descriptive display bands, not validated efficacy cutoffs, occurrence-baseline positions, statistical significance, evidence certainty, safety or net benefit. A range spanning bands retains both labels; a qualitative label has no implied percentage. Control in context Pressing sent all liquor cadmium into the cake; cocoa butter was below 1.5 µg/kg while powder held 111 µg/kg against 60 µg/kg in liquor.
Design, applicability and operating conditions Measured comparison. One pilot batch. One study family. As reported by the source Reduces metal reaching the bean or product, or detects it before release. Source measurements and linked outcomes
Single batch; mass balance only. No percentage calculated unless shown in outcomes. Not applicable unless stated. Trade-offs and implementation Not assessed. Not assessed. Not assessed. Not quantified. Not assessed. Applicability and verification One pilot batch. Lot testing. See source. Extraction limits and next actions
Provenance and assessment As disclosed by the source. Source facts and HMI calculations are distinguished above. These selected source findings do not constitute a systematic review; outcome-level appraisal remains incomplete. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Source low-cadmium origins and verify bean lotssourcing and procurement · As reported | Cocoa | Cd · Decreased Pb · Increased | 1As You Sow 2022 HMI source record · Original source One dataset family. Linked analytes, repeated seasons and reports are not independent studies. Effects and comparators CadmiumDecreasedLower Cd in West African beans (observational)Median bean cadmiumEcuador versus Côte d’IvoireCocoa beansHigh · HMI calculates the relative change from the retained source means: (60 − 511) / 511 × 100 = -88.3%. This is a descriptive contrast of means; no confidence interval or significance test is inferred. LeadIncreasedPb not lower in West African beansMedian bean leadEcuador versus Côte d’IvoireCocoa beansHigh · HMI calculates the relative change from the retained source means: (25 − 10) / 10 × 100 = 150.0%. This is a descriptive contrast of means; no confidence interval or significance test is inferred. Bean origins tested by the same companies. How magnitude is classified HMI editorial magnitude bands: Low is a change greater than 0% and below 25%; Moderate is 25% to below 50%; High is 50% or more, relative to that control’s own comparator. Direction is shown separately. These are descriptive display bands, not validated efficacy cutoffs, occurrence-baseline positions, statistical significance, evidence certainty, safety or net benefit. A range spanning bands retains both labels; a qualitative label has no implied percentage. Control in context Median bean cadmium was 55–94 µg/kg for Nigeria, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Cameroon and Brazil, against 511–892 µg/kg for Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela; lead medians did not follow the same order.
Design, applicability and operating conditions Observational comparison. Industry testing, 2015–2019. One study family. As reported by the source Reduces metal reaching the bean or product, or detects it before release. Source measurements and linked outcomes
Blinded industry data without QA details. No percentage calculated unless shown in outcomes. Not applicable unless stated. Trade-offs and implementation Not assessed. Not assessed. Not assessed. Not quantified. Not assessed. Applicability and verification Industry testing, 2015–2019. Lot testing. See source. Extraction limits and next actions
Provenance and assessment As disclosed by the source. Source facts and HMI calculations are distinguished above. These selected source findings do not constitute a systematic review; outcome-level appraisal remains incomplete. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Choose cocoa content with its cadmium implication in viewproduct formulation · As reported | Cocoa | Cd · Decreased | 1Kataoka et al. 2018 HMI source record · Original source One dataset family. Linked analytes, repeated seasons and reports are not independent studies. Effects and comparators CadmiumDecreasedLower Cd at lower cocoa contentMedian chocolate cadmium≥80% versus <50% cocoaChocolate as soldHigh · HMI calculates the relative change from the retained source means: (23 − 250) / 250 × 100 = -90.8%. This is a descriptive contrast of means; no confidence interval or significance test is inferred. Cocoa-content groups in one retail survey. How magnitude is classified HMI editorial magnitude bands: Low is a change greater than 0% and below 25%; Moderate is 25% to below 50%; High is 50% or more, relative to that control’s own comparator. Direction is shown separately. These are descriptive display bands, not validated efficacy cutoffs, occurrence-baseline positions, statistical significance, evidence certainty, safety or net benefit. A range spanning bands retains both labels; a qualitative label has no implied percentage. Control in context Median cadmium rose from 23 µg/kg in chocolate under 50% cocoa to 120, 190 and 250 µg/kg in successive higher-cocoa groups.
Design, applicability and operating conditions Observational comparison. Japan, 2015–2016. One study family. As reported by the source Reduces metal reaching the bean or product, or detects it before release. Source measurements and linked outcomes
Lowers cadmium per gram of product, not per gram of cocoa. No percentage calculated unless shown in outcomes. Not applicable unless stated. Trade-offs and implementation Not assessed. Not assessed. Not assessed. Not quantified. Not assessed. Applicability and verification Japan, 2015–2016. Lot testing. See source. Extraction limits and next actions
Provenance and assessment As disclosed by the source. Source facts and HMI calculations are distinguished above. These selected source findings do not constitute a systematic review; outcome-level appraisal remains incomplete. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Enforce the Codex cocoa cadmium limits at lot releaselot acceptance and release · As reported | Cocoa | Cd · Context | 1JECFA 2022 HMI source record · Original source One dataset family. Linked analytes, repeated seasons and reports are not independent studies. Effects and comparators CadmiumTotal exposure 0.7% lower on averageCocoa share of dietary cadmiumWith versus without limitsDietary exposureContext · No supported numerical treatment contrast is retained for this finding. A direction, market association, source-selection strategy or guidance statement alone does not establish a percentage change. Exposure with and without the limits applied to occurrence data. How magnitude is classified HMI editorial magnitude bands: Low is a change greater than 0% and below 25%; Moderate is 25% to below 50%; High is 50% or more, relative to that control’s own comparator. Direction is shown separately. These are descriptive display bands, not validated efficacy cutoffs, occurrence-baseline positions, statistical significance, evidence certainty, safety or net benefit. A range spanning bands retains both labels; a qualitative label has no implied percentage. Control in context Applying the Codex limits lowered cocoa’s average share of cadmium exposure from 2.2% to 1.5% and total cadmium exposure by 0.7% on average (up to 2.4%).
Design, applicability and operating conditions Statistical model of compiled data. Global cluster diets. One study family. As reported by the source Reduces metal reaching the bean or product, or detects it before release. Source measurements and linked outcomes
Modelled; testing detects and excludes, it does not remove cadmium. No percentage calculated unless shown in outcomes. Not applicable unless stated. Trade-offs and implementation Not assessed. Not assessed. Not assessed. Not quantified. Not assessed. Applicability and verification Global cluster diets. Lot testing. See source. Extraction limits and next actions
Provenance and assessment As disclosed by the source. Source facts and HMI calculations are distinguished above. These selected source findings do not constitute a systematic review; outcome-level appraisal remains incomplete. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Do not rely on organic certification to lower cadmiumsourcing and procurement · As reported | Cocoa | Cd · Context | 1Hands et al. 2024 HMI source record · Original source One dataset family. Linked analytes, repeated seasons and reports are not independent studies. Effects and comparators CadmiumHigher Cd in organic productsProduct cadmiumOrganic versus non-organicProducts as soldContext · No supported numerical treatment contrast is retained for this finding. A direction, market association, source-selection strategy or guidance statement alone does not establish a percentage change. Organic versus non-organic products in the same analysis. How magnitude is classified HMI editorial magnitude bands: Low is a change greater than 0% and below 25%; Moderate is 25% to below 50%; High is 50% or more, relative to that control’s own comparator. Direction is shown separately. These are descriptive display bands, not validated efficacy cutoffs, occurrence-baseline positions, statistical significance, evidence certainty, safety or net benefit. A range spanning bands retains both labels; a qualitative label has no implied percentage. Control in context Certified-organic products averaged about 401 µg/kg more cadmium and 20 µg/kg more lead than non-organic products.
Design, applicability and operating conditions Observational comparison. US market, 2014–2022. One study family. As reported by the source Reduces metal reaching the bean or product, or detects it before release. Source measurements and linked outcomes
Observational; product mix not controlled. No percentage calculated unless shown in outcomes. Not applicable unless stated. Trade-offs and implementation Not assessed. Not assessed. Not assessed. Not quantified. Not assessed. Applicability and verification US market, 2014–2022. Lot testing. See source. Extraction limits and next actions
Provenance and assessment As disclosed by the source. Source facts and HMI calculations are distinguished above. These selected source findings do not constitute a systematic review; outcome-level appraisal remains incomplete. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No matching controls in this selected evidence. This is a coverage boundary, not proof that no control exists. Change or reset the filters.
Trade-offs and limits of controls
Switching origin to reduce cadmium can leave lead unchanged or higher. West African beans had the lowest cadmium medians but lead medians of about 25 µg/kg, while Ecuadorian and Peruvian beans were higher in cadmium and lower in lead in the same industry testing.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →
Soil amendments are not uniformly effective. A review found that gypsum, or lime with compost, lowered leaf cadmium but not bean cadmium in some trials, and that some liming materials increased uptake.33Addressing Cadmium in Cacao Farmland: A Path to Safer, Sustainable ChocolateAgricultureRead source → Biochar effects were not statistically significant in every soil tested.30Reducing cadmium bioaccumulation in Theobroma cacao using biochar: basis for scaling-up to fieldHeliyonRead source →
Blending dilutes a high-cadmium lot rather than removing cadmium, and a lower-cocoa recipe lowers cadmium per gram of chocolate but not per gram of cocoa.2Surveillance of Cadmium Concentration in Chocolate and Cocoa Powder Products Distributed in JapanFood Hygiene and Safety ScienceRead source →32Cadmium in Cacao from Latin America and the Caribbean: A Review of Research and Potential Mitigation SolutionsBioversity International / CAF Development Bank of Latin AmericaRead source → Organic certification is not a cadmium control: certified-organic products measured higher in the US analysis.26A multi-year heavy metal analysis of 72 dark chocolate and cocoa products in the USAFrontiers in NutritionRead source →
Testing cocoa for metals
A useful cocoa test states the form, the basis and the cocoa-solids content, because the EU and Codex limits are set by cocoa-solids class.7Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 of 25 April 2023 on maximum levels for certain contaminants in food and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006Official Journal of the European UnionRead source →11General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed (CXS 193-1995)Codex Alimentarius (Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme)Read source → Beans are usually reported on a dry-weight basis and products as sold; Singapore’s cocoa-powder limits are even set on a dry, fat-free basis.16Heavy metal accumulation in leaves and beans of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) in major cacao growing regions in PeruScience of the Total EnvironmentRead source →34Food Regulations: regulation 31 heavy metals, arsenic and leadSingapore Statutes OnlineRead source →
Detection limits must sit well below the relevant limit. FDA’s reporting limits were 3 µg/kg for cadmium and 10 µg/kg for lead in cocoa powder, while some monitoring submissions used limits of 40 µg/kg or more for cadmium in powder, which hides much of the lower range.5GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →14FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source → Several surveys reported no detection limit, reference material or recovery check, and two were held here because their values could not be reconciled with their own methods.18Determination of Heavy Metals in Locally Available Chocolates in Lahore RegionTurkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and TechnologyRead source →19Levels of heavy metals concentrations in chocolates from Bwari market Abuja FCT, NigeriaInternational Journal of Adulteration9:e2ijad3057Read source →
Arsenic and mercury in cocoa are reported almost entirely as totals.5GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →35Scientific Opinion on Arsenic in FoodEFSA Journal 2009;7(10):1351Read source → Inorganic arsenic in European monitoring of chocolate and cocoa powder was mostly below about 20 µg/kg, and no source measured methylmercury or hexavalent chromium in cocoa.5GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Why do some surveys report very high metals in chocolate?
Some very high values come from products that are mostly not cocoa or from methods that cannot support them. A Lahore survey converted digest results with inconsistent factors and included many compound confections without cocoa, and an Abuja survey reported chromium 30–40 times the limit it cited while concluding compliance.18Determination of Heavy Metals in Locally Available Chocolates in Lahore RegionTurkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and TechnologyRead source →19Levels of heavy metals concentrations in chocolates from Bwari market Abuja FCT, NigeriaInternational Journal of Adulteration9:e2ijad3057Read source →
Buying and verifying cocoa
Ask for lot-specific cadmium results with the cocoa-solids content, and compare them with the limit for the destination market.7Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 of 25 April 2023 on maximum levels for certain contaminants in food and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006Official Journal of the European UnionRead source →11General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed (CXS 193-1995)Codex Alimentarius (Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme)Read source → The EU sets cadmium at 0.10 mg/kg for milk chocolate under 30% cocoa solids, 0.30 mg/kg for chocolate under 50%, 0.80 mg/kg for chocolate at 50% or more and 0.60 mg/kg for consumer cocoa powder.7Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 of 25 April 2023 on maximum levels for certain contaminants in food and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006Official Journal of the European UnionRead source → Codex and Hong Kong set 0.3, 0.7, 0.8 and 0.9 mg/kg across the same cocoa-content bands and 2.0 mg/kg for cocoa powder, and Australia and New Zealand set 0.5 mg/kg for chocolate and cocoa products.11General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed (CXS 193-1995)Codex Alimentarius (Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme)Read source →36Hong Kong Cap. 132V Food Adulteration (Metallic Contamination) Regulations, consolidated 5 September 2025Hong Kong e-Legislation Cap. 132VRead source →37Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code - Schedule 19 - Maximum levels of contaminants and natural toxicantsFederal Register of Legislation, Authorised Version F2024C00908Read source →
Other markets also limit lead and arsenic. MERCOSUR sets lead at 0.2–0.5 mg/kg and arsenic at 0.2–0.5 mg/kg for cocoa paste and chocolates, China sets lead and total arsenic at 0.5 mg/kg for cocoa products and chocolate, and the EU has applied nickel limits of 2.5–15 mg/kg since July 2025.27Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/1987 of 30 July 2024 amending Regulation (EU) 2023/915 as regards maximum levels of nickel in certain foodstuffsOfficial Journal of the European Union, L series, 2024/1987 (31.7.2024)Read source →38MERCOSUR/GMC/RES. No. 12/11: Reglamento Tecnico MERCOSUR sobre Limites Maximos de Contaminantes Inorganicos en AlimentosMERCOSUR/GMC/RES. No. 12/11Read source →39China Releases the Standard for Maximum Levels of Contaminants in Foods (USDA FAS GAIN Report CH2023-0040, unofficial translation of GB 2762-2022)USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN), Report Number CH2023-0040Read source →
For cadmium, record the bean origin and request bean-lot results, since origin is the strongest predictor but varies within countries.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →16Heavy metal accumulation in leaves and beans of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) in major cacao growing regions in PeruScience of the Total EnvironmentRead source → Buyers have used bean acceptance thresholds of about 0.5–1.1 mg/kg to meet the chocolate limits.32Cadmium in Cacao from Latin America and the Caribbean: A Review of Research and Potential Mitigation SolutionsBioversity International / CAF Development Bank of Latin AmericaRead source → For lead, specify cleaning, shell and dust removal and request finished-lot results, because lead depends on handling rather than origin.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →
Exposure from cocoa and chocolate
Cocoa is a modest but real source of dietary cadmium.12Cadmium dietary exposure in the European populationEFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2551Read source →9Cadmium: dietary exposure assessmentWHO Food Additives Series, No. 82 (Safety evaluation of certain contaminants in food, prepared by the 91st meeting of JECFA)Read source → EFSA found that chocolate products supplied 4.3% of cadmium exposure across European age groups, and close to 10% for school-age children when cocoa beans and products are added.12Cadmium dietary exposure in the European populationEFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2551Read source → JECFA put cocoa products at 0.1–9.4% of cadmium exposure across national and regional diets and concluded they are not a major contributor; applying the Codex limits lowered total exposure by 0.7% on average.9Cadmium: dietary exposure assessmentWHO Food Additives Series, No. 82 (Safety evaluation of certain contaminants in food, prepared by the 91st meeting of JECFA)Read source →
Chocolate matters more for nickel. EFSA found that sugar and confectionery, driven mainly by chocolate, supplied up to 31% of adolescents’ nickel exposure, and cocoa beverages, with soft drinks, were the main beverage contributors for toddlers.40Update of the Risk Assessment of Nickel in Food and Drinking WaterEFSA Journal 2020;18(11):6268Read source →
Concentration is not intake: a small serving of dark chocolate can add more cadmium than a larger serving of milk chocolate.1Cadmium and Lead in Cocoa Powder and Chocolate Products in the U.S. MarketFood Additives & Contaminants: Part B SurveillanceRead source →2Surveillance of Cadmium Concentration in Chocolate and Cocoa Powder Products Distributed in JapanFood Hygiene and Safety ScienceRead source → Australian milk chocolate averaged 15 µg/kg cadmium and 6 µg/kg lead in the 25th total diet study, near the low end of retail chocolate.4125th Australian Total Diet StudyFood Standards Australia New ZealandRead source →
Evidence review and remaining gaps
This assessment covers every source record in the HMI library that is tagged to cocoa or mentions cocoa, cacao or chocolate, plus every matching row in WHO GEMS/Food, the FDA Total Diet Study and other indexed datasets, each with a recorded decision based on its content. Two retail surveys are held in full and individual values from several others are held because they could not be reconciled with their own methods or figures.18Determination of Heavy Metals in Locally Available Chocolates in Lahore RegionTurkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and TechnologyRead source →19Levels of heavy metals concentrations in chocolates from Bwari market Abuja FCT, NigeriaInternational Journal of Adulteration9:e2ijad3057Read source →20Content and the relationship between cadmium, nickel, and lead concentrations in Ecuadorian cocoa beans from nine provincesFood ControlRead source →
The remaining gaps are mostly unpublished data. Per-farm bean results behind the Ecuadorian compost trial and the Peruvian national map, per-product values behind the multi-year US analysis, and EFSA’s 2020 nickel annex were not available in the library.23The distribution of cadmium in soil and cacao beans in PeruScience of the Total EnvironmentRead source →26A multi-year heavy metal analysis of 72 dark chocolate and cocoa products in the USAFrontiers in NutritionRead source →40Update of the Risk Assessment of Nickel in Food and Drinking WaterEFSA Journal 2020;18(11):6268Read source →31Cadmium fractionation in soils affected by organic matter application: Transfer of cadmium to cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) tissuesFrontiers in Environmental ScienceRead source →
References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.
Cocoa FAQs
What heavy metals are found in cocoa and chocolate?
Cadmium is the metal found at levels that matter most, followed by lead; cocoa is also high in nickel and aluminium.1Cadmium and Lead in Cocoa Powder and Chocolate Products in the U.S. MarketFood Additives & Contaminants: Part B SurveillanceRead source →4Scientific Opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of nickel in food and drinking waterEFSA Journal 2015;13(2):4002, 202 pp.Read source →24Dietary exposure assessment of aluminium and cadmium from cocoa in relation to cocoa originPLoS ONERead source → Arsenic and mercury are usually low or below detection.5GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →14FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →
How do heavy metals get into cocoa?
Cadmium is taken up from the soil by the roots and is highest where soils are rich in cadmium and acidic.6Drivers of cadmium accumulation in Theobroma cacao L. beans: A quantitative synthesis of soil-plant relationships across the Cacao BeltPLOS ONERead source →23The distribution of cadmium in soil and cacao beans in PeruScience of the Total EnvironmentRead source → Lead mostly settles on the bean shell from soil and dust after harvest.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →
Is organic chocolate lower in heavy metals?
Not in the available evidence: in a multi-year US analysis, certified-organic products averaged about 400 µg/kg more cadmium and 20 µg/kg more lead.26A multi-year heavy metal analysis of 72 dark chocolate and cocoa products in the USAFrontiers in NutritionRead source → A German organic milk chocolate pool also had more cadmium than the conventional pool (56 against 16 µg/kg), though that is one pool each.17Results of the BfR MEAL Study: In Germany, mercury is mostly contained in fish and seafood while cadmium, lead, and nickel are present in a broad spectrum of foodsFood Chemistry: XRead source →
Which types of chocolate have the lowest levels?
Milk and white chocolate, because they contain the least cocoa solids.1Cadmium and Lead in Cocoa Powder and Chocolate Products in the U.S. MarketFood Additives & Contaminants: Part B SurveillanceRead source →2Surveillance of Cadmium Concentration in Chocolate and Cocoa Powder Products Distributed in JapanFood Hygiene and Safety ScienceRead source → In the US survey, milk chocolate averaged 60 µg/kg cadmium against 270 µg/kg in dark chocolate and 700 µg/kg in cocoa powder.1Cadmium and Lead in Cocoa Powder and Chocolate Products in the U.S. MarketFood Additives & Contaminants: Part B SurveillanceRead source →
Which growing regions produce cocoa with the lowest cadmium?
West African beans measured lowest, with medians of 55–90 µg/kg for Nigeria, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana and Cameroon, against 511–892 µg/kg for Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source → Ranges within countries are wide, and these origins are not lower in lead.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →16Heavy metal accumulation in leaves and beans of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) in major cacao growing regions in PeruScience of the Total EnvironmentRead source →
Is cocoa powder higher in metals than chocolate?
Yes: cocoa powder is the most concentrated retail form because it is defatted cocoa solids.10Cd and Pb in cocoa beans: Occurrence and effects of chocolate processingFood Control 119, 107455Read source → US cocoa powder averaged 700 µg/kg cadmium and 110 µg/kg lead, against 270 and 30 µg/kg in dark chocolate.1Cadmium and Lead in Cocoa Powder and Chocolate Products in the U.S. MarketFood Additives & Contaminants: Part B SurveillanceRead source →
What do the levels in chocolate mean for health?
Chocolate is a modest source of dietary cadmium, supplying about 4% of European exposure and close to 10% for school-age children.12Cadmium dietary exposure in the European populationEFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2551Read source → JECFA concluded cocoa products are not a major contributor to cadmium exposure, but they matter more for nickel in children and adolescents.9Cadmium: dietary exposure assessmentWHO Food Additives Series, No. 82 (Safety evaluation of certain contaminants in food, prepared by the 91st meeting of JECFA)Read source →40Update of the Risk Assessment of Nickel in Food and Drinking WaterEFSA Journal 2020;18(11):6268Read source →
Are there legal limits for heavy metals in chocolate?
Yes: the EU limits cadmium at 0.10–0.80 mg/kg in chocolate by cocoa content and 0.60 mg/kg in cocoa powder, and has limited nickel since July 2025.7Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 of 25 April 2023 on maximum levels for certain contaminants in food and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006Official Journal of the European UnionRead source →27Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/1987 of 30 July 2024 amending Regulation (EU) 2023/915 as regards maximum levels of nickel in certain foodstuffsOfficial Journal of the European Union, L series, 2024/1987 (31.7.2024)Read source → Codex sets cadmium at 0.3–0.9 mg/kg for chocolate and 2.0 mg/kg for cocoa powder, and MERCOSUR and China also limit lead.11General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed (CXS 193-1995)Codex Alimentarius (Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme)Read source →38MERCOSUR/GMC/RES. No. 12/11: Reglamento Tecnico MERCOSUR sobre Limites Maximos de Contaminantes Inorganicos en AlimentosMERCOSUR/GMC/RES. No. 12/11Read source →39China Releases the Standard for Maximum Levels of Contaminants in Foods (USDA FAS GAIN Report CH2023-0040, unofficial translation of GB 2762-2022)USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN), Report Number CH2023-0040Read source →
Can processing reduce heavy metals in cocoa?
Cleaning and shelling lower lead: cleaning cut whole-bean lead from 95.2 to 23.2–39.7 µg/kg in one factory study.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source → Processing does not remove cadmium; it moves it into the cocoa solids, so powder ends up more concentrated than liquor.10Cd and Pb in cocoa beans: Occurrence and effects of chocolate processingFood Control 119, 107455Read source →
How much does chocolate add to children’s exposure?
For European school-age children, chocolate and cocoa products together supplied close to 10% of cadmium exposure.12Cadmium dietary exposure in the European populationEFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2551Read source → Chocolate also drove up to 31% of adolescents’ nickel exposure.40Update of the Risk Assessment of Nickel in Food and Drinking WaterEFSA Journal 2020;18(11):6268Read source →
Why does dark chocolate have more cadmium than milk chocolate?
Cadmium sits in the nonfat cocoa solids, so it rises with cocoa content.10Cd and Pb in cocoa beans: Occurrence and effects of chocolate processingFood Control 119, 107455Read source → In Japan, the median rose from 23 µg/kg below 50% cocoa to 250 µg/kg at 80% or more.2Surveillance of Cadmium Concentration in Chocolate and Cocoa Powder Products Distributed in JapanFood Hygiene and Safety ScienceRead source →
Is the lead in chocolate from the soil?
Mostly not: lead is concentrated on the shell and in dust, and one investigation attributed about 70% of nib lead to contact during bean breaking and winnowing.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source → Industry shell lead had a median of 341 µg/kg against 1.2 µg/kg in nibs.3Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →
Has lead or cadmium in chocolate been falling?
In a US analysis of products bought in 2014–2022, lead was lower in the 2019 and 2022 cohorts than in 2014, and cadmium was lower in 2022.26A multi-year heavy metal analysis of 72 dark chocolate and cocoa products in the USAFrontiers in NutritionRead source → The cohorts were different products chosen by popularity, so this is not a market-wide trend.26A multi-year heavy metal analysis of 72 dark chocolate and cocoa products in the USAFrontiers in NutritionRead source →
Does cocoa contain nickel?
Yes, at levels high for food: about 9,500 µg/kg in cocoa beans and products and 3,800 µg/kg in chocolate in European monitoring.4Scientific Opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of nickel in food and drinking waterEFSA Journal 2015;13(2):4002, 202 pp.Read source → The EU has limited nickel since July 2025 at 2.5–7.0 mg/kg in chocolate and 15 mg/kg in cocoa powder.27Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/1987 of 30 July 2024 amending Regulation (EU) 2023/915 as regards maximum levels of nickel in certain foodstuffsOfficial Journal of the European Union, L series, 2024/1987 (31.7.2024)Read source →
Does cocoa contain arsenic or mercury?
Usually little: FDA cocoa powder held 29 µg/kg total arsenic and 15 µg/kg mercury, and most European inorganic-arsenic results were below about 20 µg/kg.5GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →14FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source → A US analysis reported a median of 50 µg/kg total arsenic in dark chocolate and cocoa products.26A multi-year heavy metal analysis of 72 dark chocolate and cocoa products in the USAFrontiers in NutritionRead source →
Is bean-to-bar chocolate different?
Not clearly: Brazilian bean-to-bar dark chocolates averaged 78 µg/kg cadmium and 13 µg/kg lead, and bean-to-bar milk chocolates 25 and 12 µg/kg, in the same range as the few conventional bars tested alongside them.42Cacau e Chocolates “Bean to Bar”: Contaminantes Inorgânicos e Ocratoxina A (Cocoa beans and “Bean to Bar” chocolates: Inorganic contaminants and Ochratoxin A)Master’s thesis, Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos (ITAL), Centro de Ciência e Qualidade de Alimentos, Campinas-SP, BrazilRead source → Artisanal Colombian single-farm bars made from high-cadmium beans averaged 1,100 µg/kg cadmium.43Cadmium in cacao crops and artisanal chocolates in the Arauca Department, ColombiaEnvironmental Monitoring and AssessmentRead source →
References
Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.
- Cadmium and Lead in Cocoa Powder and Chocolate Products in the U.S. MarketPeer-reviewed
- Surveillance of Cadmium Concentration in Chocolate and Cocoa Powder Products Distributed in JapanPeer-reviewed
- Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportIndustry
- Scientific Opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of nickel in food and drinking waterGovernment
- GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsDataset
- Drivers of cadmium accumulation in Theobroma cacao L. beans: A quantitative synthesis of soil-plant relationships across the Cacao BeltPeer-reviewed
- Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 of 25 April 2023 on maximum levels for certain contaminants in food and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006Regulation
- Perspective on Cadmium and Lead in Cocoa and ChocolatePeer-reviewed
- Cadmium: dietary exposure assessmentGovernment
- Cd and Pb in cocoa beans: Occurrence and effects of chocolate processingPeer-reviewed
- General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed (CXS 193-1995)Government
- Cadmium dietary exposure in the European populationGovernment
- Code of Practice for the Prevention and Reduction of Cadmium Contamination in Cocoa Beans (CXC 81-2022)Government
- FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsDataset
- Over-the-Counter (OTC) Monograph M016: Skin Protectant Drug Products for Over-the-Counter Human Use (Posted September 24, 2021)Government
- Heavy metal accumulation in leaves and beans of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) in major cacao growing regions in PeruPeer-reviewed
- Results of the BfR MEAL Study: In Germany, mercury is mostly contained in fish and seafood while cadmium, lead, and nickel are present in a broad spectrum of foodsPeer-reviewed
- Determination of Heavy Metals in Locally Available Chocolates in Lahore RegionPeer-reviewed
- Levels of heavy metals concentrations in chocolates from Bwari market Abuja FCT, NigeriaPeer-reviewed
- Content and the relationship between cadmium, nickel, and lead concentrations in Ecuadorian cocoa beans from nine provincesPeer-reviewed
- Relationships between cadmium in tissues of cacao trees and soils in plantations of Trinidad and TobagoPeer-reviewed
- From soil to cacao bean: Unravelling the pathways of cadmium translocation in a high Cd accumulating cultivar of Theobroma cacao LPeer-reviewed
- The distribution of cadmium in soil and cacao beans in PeruPeer-reviewed
- Dietary exposure assessment of aluminium and cadmium from cocoa in relation to cocoa originPeer-reviewed
- Migration of aluminum from food contact materials to food - a health risk for consumers? Part I of III: exposure to aluminum, release of aluminum, tolerable weekly intake (TWI), toxicological effects of aluminum, study design, and methodsPeer-reviewed
- A multi-year heavy metal analysis of 72 dark chocolate and cocoa products in the USAPeer-reviewed
- Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/1987 of 30 July 2024 amending Regulation (EU) 2023/915 as regards maximum levels of nickel in certain foodstuffsRegulation
- Induction of rhizobium japonicum in the fermentative mass of two varieties of cacao (Theobroma Cacao L.) as a strategy for the decrease of cadmiumPeer-reviewed
- Mitigation of Cadmium Accumulation in Cocoa Beans Using Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi, Biochar and Callisia repensPeer-reviewed
- Reducing cadmium bioaccumulation in Theobroma cacao using biochar: basis for scaling-up to fieldPeer-reviewed
- Cadmium fractionation in soils affected by organic matter application: Transfer of cadmium to cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) tissuesPeer-reviewed
- Cadmium in Cacao from Latin America and the Caribbean: A Review of Research and Potential Mitigation SolutionsGovernment
- Addressing Cadmium in Cacao Farmland: A Path to Safer, Sustainable ChocolateReview
- Food Regulations: regulation 31 heavy metals, arsenic and leadRegulation
- Scientific Opinion on Arsenic in FoodGovernment
- Hong Kong Cap. 132V Food Adulteration (Metallic Contamination) Regulations, consolidated 5 September 2025Regulation
- Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code - Schedule 19 - Maximum levels of contaminants and natural toxicantsRegulation
- MERCOSUR/GMC/RES. No. 12/11: Reglamento Tecnico MERCOSUR sobre Limites Maximos de Contaminantes Inorganicos en AlimentosRegulation
- China Releases the Standard for Maximum Levels of Contaminants in Foods (USDA FAS GAIN Report CH2023-0040, unofficial translation of GB 2762-2022)Regulation
- Update of the Risk Assessment of Nickel in Food and Drinking WaterGovernment
- 25th Australian Total Diet StudyGovernment
- Cacau e Chocolates “Bean to Bar”: Contaminantes Inorgânicos e Ocratoxina A (Cocoa beans and “Bean to Bar” chocolates: Inorganic contaminants and Ochratoxin A)Thesis
- Cadmium in cacao crops and artisanal chocolates in the Arauca Department, ColombiaPeer-reviewed
- Soil properties and agronomic factors affecting cadmium concentrations in cacao beans: A nationwide survey in EcuadorPeer-reviewed
Sources
Browse Cocoa Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.
Update history
4 November 2026: Added the Argüello 2019 nationwide Ecuador cacao bean cadmium survey.
22 October 2026 — Rebuilt from every cocoa and chocolate record in the library: WHO GEMS/Food and FDA monitoring results, retail, farm and total diet studies, industry origin testing, form-specific comparisons, verified limits and stage-led controls.
