Skip to content

EFSA CONTAM 2020 — Nickel in Food and Drinking Water

Summary

The EFSA CONTAM Panel update of the risk assessment of nickel in food and drinking water (adopted September 2020, EFSA Journal 2020;18(11):6268) establishes a tolerable daily intake (TDI) for chronic oral nickel exposure of 13 µg Ni/kg body weight per day, anchored on increased post-implantation loss in rats with a BMDL10 of 1.3 mg Ni/kg/day as the reference point. For acute oral exposure, the Panel identified eczematous flare-up reactions in nickel-sensitized humans (systemic contact dermatitis) as the critical effect, with a LOAEL of 4.3 µg Ni/kg bw. The Panel applied a margin-of-exposure approach for acute exposure with MOE ≥ 30 considered low concern. The assessment used more than 47,000 European nickel occurrence data points.

The assessment’s central regulatory conclusion is an exceedance: estimated chronic dietary nickel exposure exceeds the TDI in the youngest consumers. The 95th-percentile chronic exposure generally exceeded the TDI in toddlers and other children, and in infants in some surveys, while remaining below or at the TDI in adolescents and adults. The Panel concluded this exceedance may raise health concerns in those young age groups, noting that even though the post-implantation-loss endpoint that anchors the TDI is not itself relevant to children, the TDI is also protective for effects that are, such as neurotoxic effects. For the roughly 15 percent of the population who are nickel-sensitized, the margin of exposure of 30 needed to protect against acute eczematous flare-up reactions (systemic contact dermatitis) is not achieved at mean or 95th-percentile exposure, which the Panel concluded raises an acute health concern. This exceedance is the scientific basis the European Commission cited when it set maximum levels for nickel in food and issued 907 directing Member States to monitor nickel across chocolate, cereals, tea, soy, nuts and other high-nickel foods through 2027.

Provenance note (2026-06-03): the canonical ingested PDF is at the raw_path above (sha256 dd04aab…). Two further identical copies of this opinion were supplied 2026-06-03 in the June 3 manual-fetch batch — raw/Manual Fetch Kimi /June 3 Folder/EFS2-18-e06268.pdf (sha256 b83f35fd…) and raw/Manual Fetch Kimi /June 3 Folder/EFSA Journal - 2020 - - Update of the risk assessment of nickel in food and drinking water 2.pdf (sha256 a7dac274…). Both are the same EFSA Journal 2020;18(11):6268 and required no separate ingest.

ParameterValue
TDI (chronic oral)13 µg Ni/kg b.w./day
Critical chronic endpointIncreased post-implantation loss in rats
Chronic BMDL101.3 mg Ni/kg b.w./day
Critical acute endpointEczematous flare-up (systemic contact dermatitis) in Ni-sensitized humans
Acute LOAEL4.3 µg Ni/kg b.w.
MOE threshold for low concern≥ 30
Occurrence datasetMore than 47,000 European data points
Chronic exposure vs TDI95th-percentile exposure exceeds the TDI in toddlers, other children, and some infants
Nickel-sensitized population~15%; acute MOE of 30 not achieved at mean or 95th-percentile exposure
Downstream EU actionMaximum levels established for nickel in food; monitoring directed by Recommendation (EU) 2024/907

Wiki pages updated on ingest

Verification notes

  • Audit subagent (2026-06-03) flagged the “~15%” nickel-sensitised-prevalence framing as not anchored on the pages it read (pp. 1, 3–6); verified false positive against the source — the paper itself states “Nickel allergic contact dermatitis has a prevalence of around 15% in the EU, Asia and the USA” (EFSA 2020;18(11):6268, p. 65 of the assessment body, sensitisation prevalence chapter). The wiki summary is faithful to the source.
  • Audit subagent (2026-06-03) flagged [[regulations/eu-2024-907-nickel-monitoring]] as a forward reference not in the taxonomy snapshot; verified false positive — the page wiki/regulations/eu-2024-907-nickel-monitoring.md exists in the live repo (the snapshot was simply not regenerated when the regulation page was added). The wikilink resolves.

Page history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page. The full version history lives in git; when DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateDescription
b0f3d382026-06-12batch | corpus rescreen b04 old terminal skips