Stub page. Chuchu et al. 2013 discusses aluminum-based packaging as a plausible source of aluminum contamination in ready-to-drink infant formulas and powdered formula products, including plastic bottle seals, laminate cartons, foil-lined containers, and foil pouches. Dabeka et al. 2011 reports that ready-to-use formula stored in glass bottles contained about 100-300 ng/g more aluminum than the same formula stored in metal containers, but most glass-stored electrolyte and glucose solutions contained less than 8 ng/g aluminum, so the paper does not assign the increase to glass alone. The aluminium content of infant formulas remains too high Lead, cadmium and aluminum in Canadian infant formulae, oral electrolytes and glucose solutions
Evidence Status
This page is a supply-chain graph anchor for packaging-related aluminum evidence. It should not be used to assign a packaging-specific p90 until source-backed migration or controlled packaging-comparison data are ingested.
References
Works cited in this page’s text, in first-appearance order. This is not the full corpus for this page; it is only what the prose above draws on. The complete set of sources is listed under Sources below. Each title links to its source record, which carries the ingest receipt, the extracted values, and the file hash of the document it was built from.
- The aluminium content of infant formulas remains too highReview
- Lead, cadmium and aluminum in Canadian infant formulae, oral electrolytes and glucose solutionsReview
Sources
- The aluminium content of infant formulas remains too high — 2013 UK infant formula aluminum survey with packaging discussion.
- There is (still) too much aluminium in infant formulas — earlier UK infant formula aluminum survey discussing processing, storage, and packaging as possible contamination routes.
- Lead, cadmium and aluminum in Canadian infant formulae, oral electrolytes and glucose solutions — Canadian formula survey with glass versus metal ready-to-use formula packaging comparison.
Update history
The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.
| Commit | Date | Change | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| a8052bb | 2026-08-09 | major | 3 sources added; 4 sections added; narrative text revised |