Burrell And Exley 2010 — Aluminium In Infant Formulas

Summary

This study measured aluminum in 15 infant formula products, including ready-made liquids, cow-milk-based powders, and one soy-based powder. It is useful for Category 1 because it directly compares powdered, ready-to-drink, and soy-based infant formula formats.

Key numbers

  • Ready-made formula Al concentrations ranged from about 176 to 700 ug/L.
  • Powdered formula Al concentrations ranged from about 2.4 to 4.3 ug/g as powder.
  • The soy-based powder had the highest powder value reported in the abstract, 4.3 ug/g, equivalent to 629 ug/L when prepared according to manufacturer directions.
  • Estimated daily Al intake for a 6-month-old using manufacturer feeding directions ranged from about 200 to 600 ug Al/day.

Category 1 concentration rows

These rows summarize the source at product-format level rather than ranking the named commercial products. The paper reports brand-level values, but public product pages use the data as occurrence evidence for formula format and ingredient platform.

Source tableCategory 1 fitN productsBasisAl mean / rangeMax / p100 in source scopeRow-fit note
Table 1 ready-made milksinfant-formula-rtf-liquid-non-soy8ready-made liquid formulaproduct means 175.5 to 700.4 ug/L700.4 ug/L mean; 863.0 ug/L replicate maximumReady-made products are not soy-based in the pasted source text; includes growing-up milk and preterm formula.
Table 2 non-soy powdersinfant-formula-powder-non-soy7powder converted by manufacturer instructionsprepared estimates 333.3 to 592.4 ug/L592.4 ug/L prepared estimate; 10.8 ug/g powder replicate maximumPowder products are formula-format evidence but not p90; includes first, follow-on, and good-night products.
Table 2 soy powderinfant-formula-powder-soy-based1powder converted by manufacturer instructions4.3 ug/g powder; 629.0 ug/L prepared estimate629.0 ug/L prepared estimate; 6.0 ug/g powder replicate maximumDirect soy-powder evidence, but N=1 and not a distribution.
Table 3 daily intakeFormula exposure context15manufacturer feeding volumes88 to 592 ug Al/day across listed products and ages592 ug Al/dayExposure estimate, not product-concentration evidence.

Ingredient and process signals

The paper identifies cow-milk-based formulas, soy-based formula, product powders, ready-made liquid formats, and possible contamination from individual constituents, processing equipment, storage, and packaging. It specifically suggests the high soy-based formula value may reflect aluminum accumulation in soybean plants and the aluminum tolerance of some soybean cultivars grown on acid soils. soy is therefore a relevant ingredient node, while milk-and-dairy and infant-formula-ingredients are formula-platform nodes rather than claims about raw milk alone.

Methods (brief)

The study prepared ready-made milks and powdered formula samples by microwave digestion with acid/peroxide mixtures and measured aluminum by transversely heated graphite atomizer analysis. Five replicate samples were prepared for each product.

Limitations

The study reports brand-level formula data, but the public wiki should not convert those brand findings into brand rankings. The data should be used as product-format evidence and as a contributor to aggregate Category 1 aluminum distributions. The paper does not provide p10, p50, p90, or p95; it provides means, ranges, replicate maxima, and daily intake estimates.

Implications

Certification: Useful for distinguishing powdered, ready-to-drink, and soy-based formula aluminum evidence.

Courses: Useful example of format-specific contamination differences.

App: Supports formula-format risk estimation where product type is known but brand ranking is outside the wiki scope.

Microbiome: No direct microbiome endpoint.

Wiki pages updated on ingest