Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index
Dry white and red beans, plain cooked beans and baked beans in tomato sauce illustrating legumes ingredient context.

Heavy metals in Legumes

Lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic and total mercury in legumes: monitoring results, studies, references by form and basis, limits, testing and controls.

Quick read

Legumes in the HMI library has 1,378 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, monomethylarsonic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ag, arsenic (As), B, Ba, Ca, mercury (Hg), I, K, Mg, Mo, Na, Sr, Ti and Tl from 90 sources.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Abdolahpour Alamdari H, Sleman Ali H, Sadighara P, Jahed Khaniki G, Shahsavanpoor Landeh K, Dehghani MH · 2023The health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables grown in Babol city, IranInternational Archives of Health SciencesRead source →4ANSES · 2026Opinion of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety on the results of the Third French Total Diet Study (TDS3) - Acrylamide, aluminium, silver, cadmium, mercury and leadANSES Opinion, Request No 2019-SA-0010Read source →5Unknown authors · 2024Detection of Heavy Metals in Some EdiblePeer-reviewed articleRead source →6Banyen S · 2013Anodic Stripping Voltammetry for Simultaneous Determination of Heavy Metals in VegetablesKMITL Science Journal (Ladkrabang) 22(1), January-June 2556 B.E., pp. 84-99Read source →

Legumes overview

Legumes in the HMI library has 1,378 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, monomethylarsonic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ag, As, B, Ba, Ca, Hg, I, K, Mg, Mo, Na, Sr, Ti and Tl from 90 sources.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Abdolahpour Alamdari H, Sleman Ali H, Sadighara P, Jahed Khaniki G, Shahsavanpoor Landeh K, Dehghani MH · 2023The health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables grown in Babol city, IranInternational Archives of Health SciencesRead source →4ANSES · 2026Opinion of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety on the results of the Third French Total Diet Study (TDS3) - Acrylamide, aluminium, silver, cadmium, mercury and leadANSES Opinion, Request No 2019-SA-0010Read source →5Unknown authors · 2024Detection of Heavy Metals in Some EdiblePeer-reviewed articleRead source →6Banyen S · 2013Anodic Stripping Voltammetry for Simultaneous Determination of Heavy Metals in VegetablesKMITL Science Journal (Ladkrabang) 22(1), January-June 2556 B.E., pp. 84-99Read source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in legumes, as sold from 6,059 results in 5 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 1.1 to 430 µg/kg.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In the US Total Diet Study, legumes, canned had a median lead result below 4 µg/kg across 3 composites from 2018–2020.2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →

Across 12 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported lead means and medians on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis ranged from 4.5 µg/kg (Yu et al. 2023) to 12,600 µg/kg (Chowdhury et al. 2024).7Yu S, Pan XD, Han JL · 2023Toxic Elements in Beans from Zhejiang, Southeast China: Distribution and Probabilistic Health Risk AssessmentFoodsRead source →8Chowdhury AI, Shill LC, Raihan MM, Rashid R, Bhuiyan MNH, Reza S, Alam MR · 2024Human health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables of BangladeshScientific Reports 2024, 14: 15616Read source → For cadmium, 18 studies on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis reported means and medians from 2 µg/kg (Guerra et al. 2012) to 300 µg/kg (Korfali et al. 2013).9Guerra F, Trevizam AR, Muraoka T, Marcante NC, Canniatti-Brazaca SG · 2012Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →10Korfali SI, Abou Hamdan W · 2013Essentail and Toxic Metals in Lebanese Marketed Canned Food: Impact of Metal CansJournal of Food Research 2(1) (2013) 19-30Read source →

For a buyer the practical points are the form bought, the basis a result is reported on, where the legumes came from and the laboratory’s reporting limit. Testing finds contamination but does not remove it.

What counts as legumes

This page covers legumes in 6 forms kept separate in every comparison: legumes, as sold (1,013 results), legumes, canned (164 results), legumes, dried (137 results), legumes, frozen (32 results), legumes, cooked (29 results) and legumes, oil (3 results).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Abdolahpour Alamdari H, Sleman Ali H, Sadighara P, Jahed Khaniki G, Shahsavanpoor Landeh K, Dehghani MH · 2023The health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables grown in Babol city, IranInternational Archives of Health SciencesRead source →4ANSES · 2026Opinion of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety on the results of the Third French Total Diet Study (TDS3) - Acrylamide, aluminium, silver, cadmium, mercury and leadANSES Opinion, Request No 2019-SA-0010Read source →5Unknown authors · 2024Detection of Heavy Metals in Some EdiblePeer-reviewed articleRead source →6Banyen S · 2013Anodic Stripping Voltammetry for Simultaneous Determination of Heavy Metals in VegetablesKMITL Science Journal (Ladkrabang) 22(1), January-June 2556 B.E., pp. 84-99Read source →

Results stay on the basis each source reports: as sold or fresh weight, dry weight, or unstated. Dry-weight, as-sold and unstated results are never pooled, and no moisture conversion is applied.

Heavy metal contamination profile of legumes

The table holds every extracted legumes result: one row for each statistic a source reports for a form, group and metal, 1,378 rows in all, grouped by metal and form; percentiles, ranges and maxima for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Abdolahpour Alamdari H, Sleman Ali H, Sadighara P, Jahed Khaniki G, Shahsavanpoor Landeh K, Dehghani MH · 2023The health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables grown in Babol city, IranInternational Archives of Health SciencesRead source →4ANSES · 2026Opinion of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety on the results of the Third French Total Diet Study (TDS3) - Acrylamide, aluminium, silver, cadmium, mercury and leadANSES Opinion, Request No 2019-SA-0010Read source →5Unknown authors · 2024Detection of Heavy Metals in Some EdiblePeer-reviewed articleRead source →6Banyen S · 2013Anodic Stripping Voltammetry for Simultaneous Determination of Heavy Metals in VegetablesKMITL Science Journal (Ladkrabang) 22(1), January-June 2556 B.E., pp. 84-99Read source → Monitoring medians are HMI calculations from individual submissions; non-detects remain intervals between zero and the reporting limit and are never read as zero.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

273 rows can be rated against an HMI reference for the same form and basis, 62 rows have a direct same-study comparison, and the rest stay unrated with the reason recorded. 65 values from 16 sources failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.3Abdolahpour Alamdari H, Sleman Ali H, Sadighara P, Jahed Khaniki G, Shahsavanpoor Landeh K, Dehghani MH · 2023The health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables grown in Babol city, IranInternational Archives of Health SciencesRead source →5Unknown authors · 2024Detection of Heavy Metals in Some EdiblePeer-reviewed articleRead source →7Yu S, Pan XD, Han JL · 2023Toxic Elements in Beans from Zhejiang, Southeast China: Distribution and Probabilistic Health Risk AssessmentFoodsRead source →11Alsabagh AAA · 2025Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlnakhla Journal of ScienceRead source →12Chen J, Chen J, Li M, Feng P, Qin M, Chen T, Luo S, Zhao J, Yan X, Chen J, Lian X, Zhang H, Huo J · 2025Probabilistic assessment of the cumulative risk from dietary heavy metal exposure in Chongqing, China using a hazard-driven approachScientific Reports 15:2229Read source →13Kawsar Hossen, Nahian Rahman, Zannatul Ferdowsi, Tahmina Ferdous · 2026Assessment of heavy metal levels and associated health risks linked to vegetables grown in Noakhali region of BangladeshEnvironmental Health InsightsRead source →14Ahn, Timothy, Chaney, Rufus L., DiBartolomeis, Michael J., Ramtahal, Gideon · 2022Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →15Cherfi A, Abdoun S, Gaci O · 2014Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in AlgeriaFood and Chemical ToxicologyRead source →16Liang G, Gong W, Li B, Zuo J, Pan L, Liu X · 2019Analysis of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs and an Assessment of the Health Risks to the General Public via Consumption in Beijing, ChinaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthRead source →17Usman MI, Gadaka MA, Maazu AB · 2021Evaluation of Some Toxic Heavy Metals in Rice and Beans Samples Cultivated in Yobe State, Nigeria.East African Journal of Health and Science 2021, 3(1): 145-151Read source →18Mahaffey KR, Corneliussen PE, Jelinek CF, Fiorino JA · 1975Heavy Metal Exposure from FoodsEnvironmental Health PerspectivesRead source →19Kharkwal V, Choudhary M, Bains K, Bishnoi M · 2023Non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risk assessment of heavy metals in cooked beans and vegetables in Punjab, North IndiaFood Science & NutritionRead source →20Wu Z · 2024Contamination of Heavy Metal(Loid)S in Cereals, Vegetables, and Legumes Purchased from Local Markets of Jiaozuo, China and The Associated Health Risk AssessmentInternational Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, 2(1): 180-200Read source →21Valizadeh Moghadam Jirandehi H, Nourieh N, Yazdanfar N, Kashi G · 2023Health Risk Assessment of Potentially Toxic Elements in Canned Pinto Beans and Fava Beans Distributed in Gilan Province of IranScientific Reports (published 2023; open access)Read source →22Imongben CO, Tomori WB, Umoru PE, Oyerinde WA · 2026Determination of some heavy metals and their potential risk in selected vegetables on sale within Kaduna Metropolis, Kaduna State, NigeriaWorld NutritionRead source →23Bulduk Ibrahim · 2020Determination of trace element levels in flowers and leaves of vicia faba by ICP-MSProgress in Chemical and Biochemical ResearchRead source →

Comparison methods and scope

Each row is one statistic a source reports for one form of legumes, group and metal; percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Different forms and preparation states are kept apart, and dry-weight results never share a reference with as-sold or fresh-weight results. Ratings place a result against an HMI reference built from monitoring results and ordinary-setting medians for the same form and basis. Same-study contrasts compare a contaminated or treated site with its control, targeted with random sampling, a prepared form with the unprocessed one, or one group of a study with the median of its other groups. Held rows failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.

About this table
Food formCollection scopeFindingComparisonEvidence
Legumes findings from monitoring programmes, total diet studies and every extracted field, market and contaminated-site study, in µg/kg with each source’s form, basis, statistic and censoring retained.
Food formCollection scopeFinding (µg/kg)ComparisonEvidence
222 findings · 52 studies · 16 spread figures folded in
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodAFRO2018median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodAFRO2018median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2008–2009median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2001–2005median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2009–2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2007–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2001median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2008–2018median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2001–2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2010–2018median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2011–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2007–2010median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2001median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2008median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2000median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2000–2010median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2003–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2000–2002median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO1995–2016median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2012–2015median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2016median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2003–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2006–2010median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2016median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2000–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2011–2012median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2013median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2002–2016median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2015median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2014–2016median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2014median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2014–2016median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2009–2013median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2013–2015median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2015median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2013–2015median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2015median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2013–2015median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2015median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2013–2015median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2016median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2014median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2000–2002median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO1995–2012median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2011–2012median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2013median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2006–2010median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2000–2005median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2013median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2008median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2016median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2009–2016median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2016median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2012median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2009–2012median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2016median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2009–2011median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2014median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2010–2011median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2011median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2012–2014median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2012median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2005–2013median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2002median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2009median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2000–2008median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2002median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2012–2014median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2000median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2014median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998–2014median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2012median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2013median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2012median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2012median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2013median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2007–2008median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2007–2014median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2009median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2000–2002median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2005–2009median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2000median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2008median.
Legumes, as soldAbdolahpour et al. 2023Babol County fields2021mean.
Legumes, as soldANSES 2026all samples (organic and conventional)2021–2022mean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Central market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Central market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreportednot detected.
Legumes, as soldBanyen 2013Hua Takhe fresh market, Bangkok2011mean.
Legumes, as soldBanyen 2013Hua Takhe fresh market, Bangkok2011mean.
Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022amateur farmers; washed with tap water2021mean.
Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021mean.
Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021mean.
Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021mean.
Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021mean.
Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021mean.
Legumes, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024pod vegetable, three local markets, Noakhali district2022mean.
Legumes, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009mean.
Legumes, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009mean.
Legumes, as soldHossen et al. 2026farm 22024mean.
Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018Cereals2010–2011mean.Same samples: 38 µg/kg (minimum); 69 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, as soldNorton et al. 2015SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedmedian.
Legumes, as soldNorton et al. 2015SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldNorton et al. 2015SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedmin.
Legumes, as soldNorton et al. 2015SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedmax.
Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016single sample exceeding EU maximum level, Varaždin market2013sample value.
Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016single sample exceeding EU maximum level, Varaždin market2013sample value.
Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013mean.Same samples: 80 µg/kg (minimum); 520 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, as soldWu 2024all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 10–380 µg/kg (range)
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2016–2017Dry weightmedian.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2012–2015Dry weightmedian.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2015Dry weightmedian.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2012Dry weightmedian.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2011–2015Dry weightmedian.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2015Dry weightmedian.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2015Dry weightmedian.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2013–2015Dry weightmedian.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2015Dry weightmedian.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2011–2015Dry weightmedian.
Legumes, as soldAhn et al. 2022Arevalo-Gardini 2016/2017 Peru (C.2 second entry)2015–2020Dry weightrange.
Legumes, as soldAhn et al. 2022Danquah 2015 Ghana, mining districts2015–2020Dry weightrange.
Legumes, as soldAhn et al. 2022Nigeria, six farms (Rankin 2005)2015–2020Dry weightrange.
Legumes, as soldAhn et al. 2022Ubilla 2018 Ecuador, 25 organic producers2015–2020Dry weightrange.
Legumes, as soldAl 2010Legume, Riyadh city markets, May 20092009Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026leafy vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldAtaee et al. 2016local market 1, KermanshahCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldAtaee et al. 2016local market 2, KermanshahCollection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldAtaee et al. 2016local market 3, KermanshahCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldBrima et al. 2025Legumes (N=14)2023–2024Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldCherfi et al. 2014Boumerdes wholesale markets2012Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldIslam et al. 2018industrial vicinity, Tangail2016Dry weightmean.Same samples: 4,710–8,740 µg/kg (range)
Legumes, as soldIyabo et al. 2015legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldIyabo et al. 2015legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldLiang et al. 2019Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldOladoye et al. 2016natural spice, Odo-Ori Market sample Spice-32015Dry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldOrisakwe et al. 2012all samples (Ohaji, Umuagwo, Owerri sites)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldPirsaheb et al. 2015all brands, domestic and imported2014Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldSalama et al. 2005legume, markets in five districts of AlexandriaCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldSalama et al. 2005legume, markets in five districts of AlexandriaCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldSharma et al. 2022four market sites, Bareilly city (pooled)2018Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldSilva et al. 2026Badulla (vegetable-paddy rotation, Ultisol)2018–2020Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021Zone A farm harvest composite (ZAB)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021Zone B farm harvest composite (ZBB)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021Zone C farm harvest composite (ZCB)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldZubairu et al. 2025improved variety, Challawa industrial areaCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldAbbas et al. 2010fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C9), measured by flame AASCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C9), measured by ICP-AESCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019cereal or bread sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C18), measured by ICP-AESCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2012Pulses (beans), farm samples from main producing regions across2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldCantoral et al. 2024Legumes (retail, Mexico City)2022–2023Basis not statednot detected.
Legumes, as soldCantoral et al. 2024Legumes (retail, Mexico City)2022–2023Basis not statednot detected.
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldChaura et al. 2026accession G3645 'Jamapa'Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldDabeka et al. 19955 city composites1986–1988Basis not statedmedian.
Legumes, as soldDabeka et al. 19955 city composites1986–1988Basis not statedmean.Same samples: 9 µg/kg (minimum); 39.8 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010Vegetables2000–2009Basis not statedmax.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010Vegetables2000–2009Basis not statedmedian.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010Vegetables2000–2009Basis not statedmean.Same samples: 0 µg/kg (percentile); 70.1 µg/kg (percentile)
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010Vegetables2000–2009Basis not statedmedian.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010Vegetables2000–2009Basis not statedmean.Same samples: 5.4 µg/kg (percentile); 200 µg/kg (percentile)
Legumes, as soldFerreira et al. 2021Bahia,BrazilCollection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldFerreira et al. 2021Bahia,BrazilCollection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldlyu 2022national2016–2019Basis not statedmean.Same samples: 4.7–34.9 µg/kg (range)
Legumes, as soldMahaffey et al. 1975US market baskets, all regions1968–1974Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldOliveira 2020Bahia,BrazilCollection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldOliveira 2020Bahia,BrazilCollection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldRomán-Ochoa et al. 2021all samples of this type2019Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 1 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 2 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 3 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2019all samples (Guangzhou, 2014-2017)2014–2017Basis not statedmedian.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2019all samples (Guangzhou, 2014-2017)2014–2017Basis not statedmedian.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2019all samples (Guangzhou, 2014-2017)2014–2017Basis not statedmedian.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2019all samples (Guangzhou, 2014-2017)2014–2017Basis not statedmean.Same samples: 64.5 µg/kg (percentile); 110 µg/kg (percentile); 70 µg/kg (percentile)
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2019all samples (Guangzhou, 2014-2017)2014–2017Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2019all samples (Guangzhou, 2014-2017)2014–2017Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2023industrial region of northern Ningxia, food category pool2017Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldZhao et al. 2022national mean of 24 provincial composites2016–2019Basis not statedmean.
29 findings · 10 studies · 3 spread figures folded in
Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2018–2020median.
Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2018–2020median.
Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018all 4 cansCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018beans retail can 1 of 4 (origin Jordan)Collection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018beans retail can 2 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreportednot detected.
Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018beans retail can 3 of 4 (origin China)Collection date unreportednot detected.
Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018beans retail can 4 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 5 µg/kg (minimum); 270 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, cannedSpungen et al. 2024all samples2018–2020not detected.
Legumes, cannedSpungen et al. 2024all samples2018–2020not detected.
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
Legumes, cannedAl 2010Legume, Riyadh city markets, May 20092009Dry weightmean.
Legumes, cannedAl 2010Legume, Riyadh city markets, May 20092009Dry weightmean.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025Jordan origin, 20.2% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025Kuwait origin, 19.0% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025Saudi Arabia origin, 19.1% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025UAE origin, 17.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not statednot detected.
Legumes, cannedCantoral et al. 2024Legumes (retail, Mexico City)2022–2023Basis not statednot detected.
Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 19955 city composites1986–1988Basis not statedmedian.
Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 19955 city composites1986–1988Basis not statedmean.Same samples: 332 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 19955 city composites1986–1988Basis not statedmin.
Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995Halifax 19861986–1988Basis not statedsample value.
Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995Montreal 19881986–1988Basis not statedsample value.
Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995Ottawa 1985 (preliminary study)1986–1988Basis not statedsample value.
Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995Toronto 19881986–1988Basis not statedsample value.
Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995Vancouver 19871986–1988Basis not statedsample value.
Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995Winnipeg 19871986–1988Basis not statedsample value.
13 findings · 4 studies · 8 spread figures folded in
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmedian.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmedian.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmedian.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 300 µg/kg (maximum); 135 µg/kg (maximum); 353 µg/kg (maximum); 190 µg/kg (maximum); 103 µg/kg (percentile); 68.7 µg/kg (percentile); 67.7 µg/kg (percentile); 170 µg/kg (percentile)
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020flowersCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020leavesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not statedsample value.
Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
6 findings · 3 studies
Legumes, cookedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2018–2019median.
Legumes, cookedSpungen et al. 2024all samples2018–2020not detected.
Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023Bathinda rural householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023Bathinda urban householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023Ludhiana rural householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023Ludhiana urban householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Legumes, oilOrisakwe et al. 2012all samples (Ohaji, Umuagwo, Owerri sites)Collection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
205 findings · 57 studies · 18 spread figures folded in
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodAFRO2018median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodAFRO2018median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEMRO2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEMRO2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEMRO2017–2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEMRO2016–2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2006–2007median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2001–2007median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2008–2009median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2006median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2009–2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2006median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2006–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2016median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2001median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2018median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2016–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2018median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2006median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2016median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2006median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2006median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2001–2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2010–2018median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2006median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2007–2010median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2001median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2011–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2014median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2007median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2000–2004median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2003–2010median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2003–2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2003–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2003–2010median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2015median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2003–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2014median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2016median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO1999–2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO1999–2018median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2003–2010median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998–2005median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2000–2002median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2000–2008median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2002median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2014median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2005median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2000–2002median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2004–2005median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2012median.
Legumes, as soldAbdolahpour et al. 2023Babol County fields2021mean.
Legumes, as soldANSES 2026all samples (organic and conventional)2021–2022mean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Central market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Central market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldBanyen 2013Hua Takhe fresh market, Bangkok2011mean.
Legumes, as soldBanyen 2013Hua Takhe fresh market, Bangkok2011mean.
Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022amateur farmers; washed with tap water2021not detected.
Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021mean.
Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021mean.
Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021mean.
Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021mean.
Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021mean.
Legumes, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024pod vegetable, three local markets, Noakhali district2022mean.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009all samples (EU Member States and others, 2003-2007)2003–2007median.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009all samples (EU Member States and others, 2003-2007)2003–2007mean.Same samples: 114 µg/kg (maximum); 0.5 µg/kg (percentile); 34 µg/kg (percentile)
Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019all samples2016median.
Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019all samples2016median.
Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019all samples2016mean.
Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019all samples2016mean.
Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019all samples2016range.
Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019all samples2016range.
Legumes, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009mean.
Legumes, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009mean.
Legumes, as soldHossen et al. 2026farm 22024mean.
Legumes, as soldJMRS et al. 2010foods from CRF patients' homes and domestic environmentCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 2.1 µg/kg (minimum); 99.2 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018Cereals2010–2011mean.Same samples: 12.7 µg/kg (minimum); 17.8 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, as soldNorton et al. 2015SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedmedian.
Legumes, as soldNorton et al. 2015SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldNorton et al. 2015SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedmin.
Legumes, as soldNorton et al. 2015SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedmax.
Legumes, as soldPan et al. 2023Fresh legume vegetables, Zhejiang monitoring 2018-20222018–2022mean.Same samples: 97 µg/kg (maximum); 49 µg/kg (percentile)
Legumes, as soldPan et al. 2023Fresh legume vegetables, Zhejiang monitoring 2018-20222018–2022min.
Legumes, as soldSilva et al. 2025all three growing areas pooled2018–2020mean.
Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013mean.Same samples: 40 µg/kg (minimum); 50 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, as soldWu 2024all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 10–430 µg/kg (range)
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2016–2019Dry weightmedian.
Legumes, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026leafy vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldAtaee et al. 2016local market 1, KermanshahCollection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldAtaee et al. 2016local market 2, KermanshahCollection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldAtaee et al. 2016local market 3, KermanshahCollection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldBrima et al. 2025Legumes (N=14)2023–2024Dry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldCardini et al. 2025Danish online-store purchaseCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Alagarno ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Alagarno ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026all wards (Kafiromi, Alagarno, Tumbi), market samplesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026all wards (Kafiromi, Alagarno, Tumbi), market samplesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Kafiromi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Kafiromi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Tumbi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Tumbi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldIslam et al. 2018industrial vicinity, Tangail2016Dry weightmean.Same samples: 940–2,250 µg/kg (range)
Legumes, as soldIyabo et al. 2015legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldLiang et al. 2019Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldMattila et al. 2018commercial product, Finland (n = 4)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldOladoye et al. 2016natural spice, Odo-Ori Market sample Spice-32015Dry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldOrisakwe et al. 2012all samples (Ohaji, Umuagwo, Owerri sites)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldPirsaheb et al. 2015all brands, domestic and imported2014Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldSalama et al. 2005legume, markets in five districts of AlexandriaCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldSalama et al. 2005legume, markets in five districts of AlexandriaCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldSharma et al. 2022four market sites, Bareilly city (pooled)2018Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldSilva et al. 2026Badulla (vegetable-paddy rotation, Ultisol)2018–2020Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021Zone A farm harvest composite (ZAB)Collection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021Zone B farm harvest composite (ZBB)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021Zone C farm harvest composite (ZCB)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldZubairu et al. 2025improved variety, Challawa industrial areaCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldAbbas et al. 2010fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2012Pulses (beans), farm samples from main producing regions across2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldCantoral et al. 2024all samples (single foodstuff, duplicate mean)2022–2023Basis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldCantoral et al. 2024all samples (single foodstuff, duplicate mean)2022–2023Basis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldCantoral et al. 2024detected foodstuffs in food group2022–2023Basis not statedmean.Same samples: 6–17 µg/kg (range)
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
Legumes, as soldChaura et al. 2026accession G3645 'Jamapa'Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldChaura et al. 2026P. acutifolius species meanCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldChaura et al. 2026P. vulgaris and P. lunatus species means, excluding G3645Collection date unreportedBasis not statedrange.
Legumes, as soldDabeka et al. 19955 city composites1986–1988Basis not statedmedian.
Legumes, as soldDabeka et al. 19955 city composites1986–1988Basis not statedmean.Same samples: 1.38 µg/kg (minimum); 3.76 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority 2012all samples (EU Member State submissions)2003–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority 2012all samples (EU Member State submissions)2003–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldFerreira et al. 2021Bahia,BrazilCollection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldFerreira et al. 2021Bahia,BrazilCollection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldHe et al. 2013Chinese National Food Survey, Shanghai, 20002002–2008Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldHe et al. 2013Shanghai food monitoring (all samples)2002–2008Basis not statedmedian.
Legumes, as soldHe et al. 2013Shanghai food monitoring (all samples)2002–2008Basis not statedmean.Same samples: 100 µg/kg (percentile)
Legumes, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldlyu 2022national2016–2019Basis not statedmean.Same samples: 4.5–41.9 µg/kg (range)
Legumes, as soldMahaffey et al. 1975US market baskets, all regions1968–1974Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldOliveira 2020Bahia,BrazilCollection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldOliveira 2020Bahia,BrazilCollection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldRomán-Ochoa et al. 2021all samples of this type2019Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 1 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 2 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 3 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2023industrial region of northern Ningxia, food category pool2017Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldZhao et al. 2022national mean of 24 provincial composites2016–2019Basis not statedmean.
21 findings · 9 studies · 4 spread figures folded in
Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2018–2020median.
Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2018–2020median.
Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018all 4 cansCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018beans retail can 1 of 4 (origin Jordan)Collection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018beans retail can 2 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018beans retail can 3 of 4 (origin China)Collection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018beans retail can 4 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013Cd mean in canned fava beans (Lebanese manufacture)Collection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 75 µg/kg (minimum); 483 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, cannedSpungen et al. 2024all samples2018–2020mean.
Legumes, cannedSpungen et al. 2024all samples2018–2020mean.
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025Jordan origin, 20.2% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025Kuwait origin, 19.0% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025Saudi Arabia origin, 19.1% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025UAE origin, 17.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not statednot detected.
Legumes, cannedCantoral et al. 2024all samples (single foodstuff, duplicate mean)2022–2023Basis not statedsample value.
Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 19955 city composites1986–1988Basis not statedmedian.
Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 19955 city composites1986–1988Basis not statedmean.Same samples: 0.61 µg/kg (minimum); 1.57 µg/kg (maximum)
15 findings · 5 studies · 8 spread figures folded in
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmedian.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmedian.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmedian.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmedian.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 980 µg/kg (maximum); 290 µg/kg (maximum); 463 µg/kg (maximum); 648 µg/kg (maximum); 113 µg/kg (percentile); 44.8 µg/kg (percentile); 77 µg/kg (percentile); 177 µg/kg (percentile)
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020flowersCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020leavesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not statednot detected.
Legumes, driedEuropean Food Safety Authority 2012all samples (EU Member State submissions)2003–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
6 findings · 3 studies
Legumes, cookedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2018–2019median.
Legumes, cookedSpungen et al. 2024all samples2018–2020not detected.
Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023Bathinda rural householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023Bathinda urban householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023Ludhiana rural householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023Ludhiana urban householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Legumes, oilOrisakwe et al. 2012all samples (Ohaji, Umuagwo, Owerri sites)Collection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
123 findings · 29 studies · 9 spread figures folded in
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodAFRO2018median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodAFRO2018median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2023median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2001–2023median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2008–2009median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2020–2021median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2009–2015median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2010–2015median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2008–2015median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2023median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2010–2023median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2002–2003median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2010–2023median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2011–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2001–2023median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2022–2023median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2014–2023median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2023median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2012median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2010–2015median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2012median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2022median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2014–2023median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2018–2022median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2016–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2007–2015median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2022median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2007median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2015–2022median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2001–2023median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2012–2014median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2023median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2008–2010median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2011–2022median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2023median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2007–2009median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2002–2003median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2002–2013median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2000median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2017–2023median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2005median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2000–2002median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2009median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2000–2008median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2002median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2013–2014median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2000median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2014median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2004–2014median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2000median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2013–2014median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2009median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2000–2002median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2004–2005median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2000median.
Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021mean.
Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021mean.
Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021mean.
Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019all samples2016median.
Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019all samples2016median.
Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019all samples2016mean.
Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019all samples2016mean.
Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019all samples2016range.
Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019all samples2016range.
Legumes, as soldHossen et al. 2026farm 22024mean.
Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 300 µg/kg (minimum); 7,400 µg/kg (maximum); 3,700 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedmin.
Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018Cereals2010–2011mean.Same samples: 15.7 µg/kg (minimum); 22.1 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025all samples2014–2016mean.Same samples: up to 43 µg/kg (range; lowest below the limit)
Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025all samples2014–2016mean.
Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025all samples2014–2016not detected.
Legumes, as soldWu 2024all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldWu 2024all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreportedrange.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldBrima et al. 2025Legumes (N=14)2023–2024Dry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldIslam et al. 2018industrial vicinity, Tangail2016Dry weightmean.Same samples: 1,260–2,110 µg/kg (range)
Legumes, as soldLiang et al. 2019Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldSandil et al. 2023flowering stage, irrigated with 0.1 mg/L As (sodium arsenate)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldSandil et al. 2023flowering stage, irrigated with 0.5 mg/L As (sodium arsenate)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldSandil et al. 2023flowering stage, irrigated with 0.25 mg/L As (sodium arsenate)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldSandil et al. 2023fruiting stage, irrigated with 0.1 mg/L As (sodium arsenate)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldSandil et al. 2023fruiting stage, irrigated with 0.5 mg/L As (sodium arsenate)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldSandil et al. 2023fruiting stage, irrigated with 0.25 mg/L As (sodium arsenate)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldSharma et al. 2022four market sites, Bareilly city (pooled)2018Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldSilva et al. 2026Badulla (vegetable-paddy rotation, Ultisol)2018–2020Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldZubairu et al. 2025improved variety, Challawa industrial areaCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldAbbas et al. 2010fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2012Pulses (beans), farm samples from main producing regions across2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldChaura et al. 2026P. acutifolius species mean (4 accessions)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldChaura et al. 2026P. vulgaris and P. lunatus species means, excluding G3645Collection date unreportedBasis not statedrange.
Legumes, as soldClair-Caliot et al. 2021purchased, uncooked (initial As)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmedian.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.Same samples: 343 µg/kg (maximum); 50 µg/kg (percentile)
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldMahaffey et al. 1975US market baskets, all regions1968–1974Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldRomán-Ochoa et al. 2021all samples of this type2019Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 1 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 2 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 3 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2023industrial region of northern Ningxia, food category pool2017Basis not statednot detected.
4 findings · 3 studies
Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2018–2020median.
Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2018–2020median.
Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not statednot detected.
Legumes, cannedValizadeh et al. 2023all brands, Rasht (Gilan), 4 brands2023Basis not statedmean.
12 findings · 3 studies · 7 spread figures folded in
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmedian.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmedian.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmedian.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 5,710 µg/kg (maximum); 290 µg/kg (maximum); 100 µg/kg (maximum); 140 µg/kg (maximum); 83 µg/kg (percentile); 90 µg/kg (percentile); 42 µg/kg (percentile)
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedpercentile.
Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not statednot detected.
Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
9 findings · 3 studies
Legumes, cookedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2018–2019median.
Legumes, cookedClair-Caliot et al. 2021cooked with water at 0 µg/L As(V)Collection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, cookedClair-Caliot et al. 2021cooked with water at 100 µg/L As(V)Collection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, cookedClair-Caliot et al. 2021cooked with water at 500 µg/L As(V)Collection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, cookedClair-Caliot et al. 2021cooked with water at 1000 µg/L As(V)Collection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023Bathinda rural householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023Bathinda urban householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023Ludhiana rural householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023Ludhiana urban householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
30 findings · 5 studies · 4 spread figures folded in
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2023median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2018–2020median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2011median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2015median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2015–2020median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2020median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2016–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2015median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2016median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2021median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2022median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011median.
Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 2,200 µg/kg (maximum); 2,100 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedmin.
Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedmin.
Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018Cereals2010–2011mean.Same samples: 2.8 µg/kg (minimum); 7.5 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2011Dry weightmedian.
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
Legumes, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not statednot detected.
2 findings · 2 studies
Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not statednot detected.
Legumes, driedEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not statedmean.
7 findings · 2 studies · 2 spread figures folded in
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2016–2017median.
Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 2,200 µg/kg (maximum); 1,600 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedmin.
Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedmin.
4 findings · 1 study · 2 spread figures folded in
Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 4,600 µg/kg (maximum); 800 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedmin.
Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedmin.
66 findings · 16 studies · 7 spread figures folded in
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodAFRO2018median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodAFRO2018median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2008–2009median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2005median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2002median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2019median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2015–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2006–2016median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2001–2002median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2016median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2011median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2016median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2007–2015median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2011median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2020median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2016median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2015–2017median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2007–2009median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2016median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2002median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2011median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2000median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998–2005median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2002median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2000–2008median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2001–2002median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2014median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998–2005median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2002median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2004–2005median.
Legumes, as soldANSES 2026all samples (organic and conventional)2021–2022not detected.
Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021mean.
Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021mean.
Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021mean.
Legumes, as soldDabeka et al. 2003Ottawa composite (retail Oct-Nov 2000)1998–2000sample value.
Legumes, as soldDabeka et al. 2003Whitehorse composite (retail Jan-Feb 1998)1998–2000not detected.
Legumes, as soldKurniawati et al. 2021all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013mean.Same samples: 7.5 µg/kg (minimum); 17.5 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, as soldBrima et al. 2025Legumes (N=14)2023–2024Dry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldLiang et al. 2019Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldSharma et al. 2022four market sites, Bareilly city (pooled)2018Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021Zone A farm harvest composite (ZAB)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021Zone B farm harvest composite (ZBB)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021Zone C farm harvest composite (ZCB)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldAbbas et al. 2010fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not statedmedian.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not statedmedian.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not statedmean.Same samples: 5 µg/kg (maximum); 9 µg/kg (maximum); 3 µg/kg (percentile); 4 µg/kg (percentile)
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldMahaffey et al. 1975US market baskets, all regions1968–1974Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldRomán-Ochoa et al. 2021all samples of this type2019Basis not statedmean.
6 findings · 4 studies · 2 spread figures folded in
Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2018–2020median.
Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2018–2020median.
Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013fava beans, highest legume HgCollection date unreportedmax.
Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 17 µg/kg (minimum); 121 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not statednot detected.
Legumes, cannedValizadeh et al. 2023all brands, Rasht (Gilan), 4 brands2023Basis not statednot detected.
7 findings · 3 studies · 12 spread figures folded in
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 37 µg/kg (maximum); 5.9 µg/kg (maximum); 1.65 µg/kg (maximum); 14.3 µg/kg (maximum); 4.37 µg/kg (percentile); 1.56 µg/kg (percentile); 0.85 µg/kg (percentile); 5.13 µg/kg (percentile)
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not statednot detected.
Legumes, driedEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not statedmedian.
Legumes, driedEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not statedmean.Same samples: 45 µg/kg (maximum); 7 µg/kg (percentile); 9 µg/kg (percentile); 11 µg/kg (percentile)
5 findings · 2 studies
Legumes, cookedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2018–2019median.
Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023Bathinda rural householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023Bathinda urban householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023Ludhiana rural householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023Ludhiana urban householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
32 findings · 16 studies · 12 spread figures folded in
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2000median.
Legumes, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024pod vegetable, three local markets, Noakhali district2022mean.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (LB)2003–2012mean.Same samples: 710 µg/kg (percentile)
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (LB)2003–2012mean.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (UB)2003–2012mean.Same samples: 710 µg/kg (percentile)
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (UB)2003–2012mean.
Legumes, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009mean.
Legumes, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009mean.
Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013mean.Same samples: 420 µg/kg (minimum); 4,360 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, as soldWu 2024all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 500–20,100 µg/kg (range)
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldIslam et al. 2018industrial vicinity, Tangail2016Dry weightmean.Same samples: 13,200–22,000 µg/kg (range)
Legumes, as soldOrisakwe et al. 2012all samples (Ohaji, Umuagwo, Owerri sites)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldPirsaheb et al. 2015all brands, domestic and imported2014Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C9), measured by flame AASCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C9), measured by ICP-AESCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019cereal or bread sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C18), measured by ICP-AESCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldDabeka et al. 1995Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldHan et al. 2024all samples in category Beans2018–2019Basis not statedmedian.
Legumes, as soldHan et al. 2024all samples in category Beans2018–2019Basis not statedmean.Same samples: 1,220–9,210 µg/kg (range); 7,750 µg/kg (percentile)
Legumes, as soldHan et al. 2024Beans (Mung bean)2018–2019Basis not statedmedian.
Legumes, as soldHan et al. 2024Beans (Mung bean)2018–2019Basis not statedmean.Same samples: 1,220–1,380 µg/kg (range); 1,370 µg/kg (percentile)
Legumes, as soldHan et al. 2024Vegetables and vegetable products (Legume (vegetable))2018–2019Basis not statedmedian.
Legumes, as soldHan et al. 2024Vegetables and vegetable products (Legume (vegetable))2018–2019Basis not statedmean.Same samples: 161–3,350 µg/kg (range); 2,610 µg/kg (percentile)
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2023industrial region of northern Ningxia, food category pool2017Basis not statedmean.
6 findings · 4 studies
Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2018–2020median.
Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2018–2020median.
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not statedsample value.
Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not statedsample value.
5 findings · 3 studies
Legumes, driedEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (LB)2003–2012mean.
Legumes, driedEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (UB)2003–2012mean.
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020flowersCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020leavesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not statedsample value.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
1 finding · 1 study
Legumes, cookedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2018–2019median.
1 finding · 1 study
Legumes, oilOrisakwe et al. 2012all samples (Ohaji, Umuagwo, Owerri sites)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
46 findings · 20 studies · 4 spread figures folded in
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2000median.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Central market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Central market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024pod vegetable, three local markets, Noakhali district2022mean.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, LB2000–2013mean.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, LB2000–2013mean.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, LB2000–2013mean.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, LB2000–2013mean.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, LB2000–2013mean.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, UB2000–2013mean.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, UB2000–2013mean.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, UB2000–2013mean.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, UB2000–2013mean.
Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, UB2000–2013mean.
Legumes, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009mean.
Legumes, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009not detected.
Legumes, as soldHossen et al. 2026farm 22024mean.
Legumes, as soldKurniawati et al. 2021all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018Cereals2010–2011mean.Same samples: 253 µg/kg (minimum); 672 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, as soldWu 2024all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 7–2,600 µg/kg (range)
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldCherfi et al. 2014Boumerdes wholesale markets2012Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Alagarno ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Alagarno ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026all wards (Kafiromi, Alagarno, Tumbi), market samplesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026all wards (Kafiromi, Alagarno, Tumbi), market samplesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Kafiromi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Kafiromi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Tumbi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Tumbi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldIslam et al. 2018industrial vicinity, Tangail2016Dry weightmean.Same samples: 12,500–21,100 µg/kg (range)
Legumes, as soldLiang et al. 2019Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldPirsaheb et al. 2015all brands, domestic and imported2014Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021Zone A farm harvest composite (ZAB)Collection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021Zone B farm harvest composite (ZBB)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021Zone C farm harvest composite (ZCB)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2023industrial region of northern Ningxia, food category pool2017Basis not statedmean.
6 findings · 4 studies · 2 spread figures folded in
Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2018–2020median.
Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2018–2020median.
Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (minimum); 60 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not statedsample value.
11 findings · 3 studies · 8 spread figures folded in
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmedian.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmedian.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmedian.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmedian.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 4,600 µg/kg (maximum); 1,050 µg/kg (maximum); 379 µg/kg (maximum); 965 µg/kg (maximum); 1,060 µg/kg (percentile); 670 µg/kg (percentile); 241 µg/kg (percentile); 436 µg/kg (percentile)
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020flowersCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020leavesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not statedsample value.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
1 finding · 1 study
Legumes, cookedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2018–2019median.
17 findings · 7 studies
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2008–2009median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2007–2009median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2000median.
Legumes, as soldANSES 2026all samples (organic and conventional)2021–2022mean.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldSharma et al. 2022four market sites, Bareilly city (pooled)2018Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2023industrial region of northern Ningxia, food category pool2017Basis not statedmean.
5 findings · 3 studies · 2 spread figures folded in
Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013fava beans, highest Al among vegetables and legumesCollection date unreportedmax.
Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 70 µg/kg (minimum); 2,700 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not statedsample value.
6 findings · 3 studies
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020flowersCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020leavesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not statedsample value.
Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
19 findings · 4 studies · 2 spread figures folded in
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2008–2009median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2007–2009median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2005median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2000–2002median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2000median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2001–2002median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2005median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2000–2002median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2005median.
Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011median.
Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018Cereals2010–2011mean.Same samples: 11.9 µg/kg (minimum); 162 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
Legumes, as soldRomán-Ochoa et al. 2021all samples of this type2019Basis not statedmean.
2 findings · 2 studies · 2 spread figures folded in
Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 2,500 µg/kg (minimum); 40,000 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not statedsample value.
1 finding · 1 study
Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not statednot detected.
3 findings · 1 study
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
1 finding · 1 study
Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not statednot detected.
1 finding · 1 study
Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not statednot detected.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2018–2020median.
Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2018–2020median.
1 finding · 1 study
Legumes, cookedFDA Total Diet Study1 collection regions2018–2019median.
9 findings · 6 studies · 2 spread figures folded in
Legumes, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009mean.
Legumes, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009mean.
Legumes, as soldKurniawati et al. 2021all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025all samples2014–2016mean.Same samples: 29–68 µg/kg (range); up to 41 µg/kg (range; lowest below the limit)
Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025all samples2014–2016mean.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldDabeka et al. 1995Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not statedsample value.
7 findings · 3 studies
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025Jordan origin, 20.2% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025Kuwait origin, 19.0% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025Saudi Arabia origin, 19.1% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025UAE origin, 17.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not statedsample value.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
49 findings · 24 studies · 6 spread figures folded in
Legumes, as soldAbdolahpour et al. 2023Babol County fields2021mean.
Legumes, as soldAbdolahpour et al. 2023Babol County fields2021max.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Central market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Central market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldBanyen 2013Hua Takhe fresh market, Bangkok2011mean.
Legumes, as soldBanyen 2013Hua Takhe fresh market, Bangkok2011mean.
Legumes, as soldHossen et al. 2026farm 22024mean.
Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018Cereals2010–2011mean.Same samples: 7,590 µg/kg (minimum); 9,620 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013mean.Same samples: 7,000 µg/kg (minimum); 11,100 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, as soldWu 2024all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 6,860–12,400 µg/kg (range)
Legumes, as soldWu 2024all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026leafy vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldCherfi et al. 2014Boumerdes wholesale markets2012Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Alagarno ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Alagarno ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026all wards (Kafiromi, Alagarno, Tumbi), market samplesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026all wards (Kafiromi, Alagarno, Tumbi), market samplesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Kafiromi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Kafiromi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Tumbi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Tumbi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldIslam et al. 2018industrial vicinity, Tangail2016Dry weightmean.Same samples: 8,730–14,600 µg/kg (range)
Legumes, as soldIyabo et al. 2015legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldIyabo et al. 2015legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldMattila et al. 2018commercial product, Finland (n = 4)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldOladoye et al. 2016natural spice, Odo-Ori Market sample Spice-32015Dry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldPirsaheb et al. 2015all brands, domestic and imported2014Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldSalama et al. 2005legume, markets in five districts of AlexandriaCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldSalama et al. 2005legume, markets in five districts of AlexandriaCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldSilva et al. 2026Badulla (vegetable-paddy rotation, Ultisol)2018–2020Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldZubairu et al. 2025improved variety, Challawa industrial areaCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C9), measured by flame AASCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C9), measured by ICP-AESCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019cereal or bread sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C18), measured by ICP-AESCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 1 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 2 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 3 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2023industrial region of northern Ningxia, food category pool2017Basis not statedmean.
13 findings · 4 studies · 2 spread figures folded in
Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018all 4 cansCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018beans retail can 1 of 4 (origin Jordan)Collection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018beans retail can 2 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018beans retail can 3 of 4 (origin China)Collection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018beans retail can 4 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013fava beans, Lebanese manufactureCollection date unreportedmax.
Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 30 µg/kg (minimum); 4,000 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025Jordan origin, 20.2% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025Kuwait origin, 19.0% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025Saudi Arabia origin, 19.1% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025UAE origin, 17.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020flowersCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020leavesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
12 findings · 8 studies
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Central market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Central market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024pod vegetable, three local markets, Noakhali district2022mean.
Legumes, as soldHossen et al. 2026farm 22024mean.
Legumes, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026leafy vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldMattila et al. 2018commercial product, Finland (n = 4)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldOladoye et al. 2016natural spice, Odo-Ori Market sample Spice-32015Dry weightsample value.
8 findings · 4 studies · 2 spread figures folded in
Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 4,000 µg/kg (minimum); 10,000 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025Jordan origin, 20.2% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025Kuwait origin, 19.0% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025Saudi Arabia origin, 19.1% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025UAE origin, 17.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedValizadeh et al. 2023all brands, Rasht (Gilan), 4 brands2023Basis not statedmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020flowersCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020leavesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
6 findings · 4 studies · 2 spread figures folded in
Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013mean.Same samples: 3,100 µg/kg (minimum); 5,400 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldMattila et al. 2018commercial product, Finland (n = 4)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weightmean.
6 findings · 2 studies
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025Jordan origin, 20.2% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025Kuwait origin, 19.0% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025Saudi Arabia origin, 19.1% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025UAE origin, 17.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020flowersCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020leavesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
40 findings · 21 studies · 3 spread figures folded in
Legumes, as soldAbdolahpour et al. 2023Babol County fields2021mean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Central market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Central market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldauthors 2024Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldBanyen 2013Hua Takhe fresh market, Bangkok2011mean.
Legumes, as soldBanyen 2013Hua Takhe fresh market, Bangkok2011mean.
Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022amateur farmers; washed with tap water2021mean.
Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021mean.
Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021mean.
Legumes, as soldKurniawati et al. 2021all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013mean.Same samples: 58,500 µg/kg (minimum); 91,000 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, as soldWu 2024all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 20,100–33,100 µg/kg (range)
Legumes, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026leafy vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldCherfi et al. 2014Boumerdes wholesale markets2012Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Alagarno ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Alagarno ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026all wards (Kafiromi, Alagarno, Tumbi), market samplesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026all wards (Kafiromi, Alagarno, Tumbi), market samplesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Kafiromi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Kafiromi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Tumbi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026Tumbi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldIyabo et al. 2015legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldIyabo et al. 2015legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldMattila et al. 2018commercial product, Finland (n = 4)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldPirsaheb et al. 2015all brands, domestic and imported2014Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldSalama et al. 2005legume, markets in five districts of AlexandriaCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldSalama et al. 2005legume, markets in five districts of AlexandriaCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldSilva et al. 2026Badulla (vegetable-paddy rotation, Ultisol)2018–2020Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldZubairu et al. 2025improved variety, Challawa industrial areaCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, as soldMahaffey et al. 1975US market baskets, all regions1968–1974Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 1 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 2 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 3 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2023industrial region of northern Ningxia, food category pool2017Basis not statedmean.
12 findings · 4 studies · 2 spread figures folded in
Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018all 4 cansCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018beans retail can 1 of 4 (origin Jordan)Collection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018beans retail can 2 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018beans retail can 3 of 4 (origin China)Collection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018beans retail can 4 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 4,000 µg/kg (minimum); 13,000 µg/kg (maximum)
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025Jordan origin, 20.2% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025Kuwait origin, 19.0% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025Saudi Arabia origin, 19.1% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025UAE origin, 17.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020flowersCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020leavesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
5 findings · 2 studies
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightnot detected.
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
4 findings · 2 studies · 1 spread figure folded in
Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025all samples2014–2016mean.Same samples: 91–196 µg/kg (range)
Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025all samples2014–2016mean.
Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025all samples2014–2016not detected.
Legumes, as soldMahaffey et al. 1975US market baskets, all regions1968–1974Basis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Legumes, as soldANSES 2026all samples (organic and conventional)2021–2022not detected.
3 findings · 1 study
Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022amateur farmers; washed with tap water2021mean.
Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021mean.
Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021not detected.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
3 findings · 2 studies
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not statedsample value.
1 finding · 1 study
Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not statedsample value.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020flowersCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020leavesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
3 findings · 1 study
Legumes, as soldWu 2024all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldWu 2024all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreportedmean.
Legumes, as soldWu 2024all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreportedrange.
3 findings · 1 study · 1 spread figure folded in
Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025all samples2014–2016mean.Same samples: up to 3.3 µg/kg (range; lowest below the limit)
Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025all samples2014–2016mean.
Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025all samples2014–2016not detected.
3 findings · 1 study
Legumes, driedSund et al. 2026PEF 12023Dry weightmean.
Legumes, driedSund et al. 2026PEF 22023Dry weightmean.
Legumes, driedSund et al. 2026PEF 32023Dry weightmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020flowersCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020leavesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020flowersCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020leavesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
3 findings · 2 studies · 2 spread figures folded in
Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025all samples2014–2016mean.Same samples: 394–942 µg/kg (range); 208–720 µg/kg (range)
Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025all samples2014–2016mean.
Legumes, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, cannedTokay 2022retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportedsample value.
Legumes, frozenTokay 2022retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreportednot detected.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020flowersCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020leavesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
4 findings · 2 studies · 2 spread figures folded in
Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025all samples2014–2016mean.Same samples: 1,250–2,290 µg/kg (range); 2,990–7,930 µg/kg (range)
Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025all samples2014–2016mean.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightsample value.
2 findings · 1 study
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightsample value.
Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group IV2021–2022Dry weightsample value.
1 finding · 1 study
Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not statednot detected.
1 finding · 1 study
Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not statednot detected.
Shared dataset methods and interpretation

Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.

HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, as sold. Legumes, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤12.3400–520 (bounded)835–1150 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤15400–520 (bounded)835–1150 (bounded)

417 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food41550%
Stančić et al. 2016250%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-7105975c1543:fabae01eb355

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤0.83≤5.182
Alternative weighting≤0.831082

26 reference units; 5 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food1720%
Altıkulaç et al. 2025220%
Ataee et al. 2016120%
Iyabo et al. 2015220%
Shivakumar et al. 2020420%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

5 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-41004e905518:1b099f84e462

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, canned

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤4≤4≤110
Alternative weighting≤4≤4≤110

10 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study633%
Spungen et al. 2024233%
Tokay 2022233%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-d0524257b3d9:1f55f69a824c

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight. Legumes, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference270044505650
Alternative weighting270044505650

4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Alsabagh 20254100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-5a9a009121e1:493bc7a561e0

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, dried

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, dried. Legumes, dried; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference4.58.6113.9
Alternative weighting4.58.6113.9

3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Yu et al. 20233100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, dried on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Yu et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, dried on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-26f571800825:deb480e47d8c

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤110≤110≤110
Alternative weighting≤110≤110≤110

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-b9a0c1ec5ff8:f6203e52a77e

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, cooked

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, cooked. Legumes, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤4≤4≤4
Alternative weighting≤4≤4≤4

3 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study250%
Spungen et al. 2024150%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-64b7b096052d:54a6bd6ad6f2

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, as sold. Legumes, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference33–3.32 (bounded)3.5–10 (bounded)
Alternative weighting334–8 (bounded)

360 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food35733%
EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009133%
EMRKB et al. 2019233%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-298aaebf5fcb:8a8ff9fe205e

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤1015–17.5 (bounded)340
Alternative weighting≤1015–17.5 (bounded)340

14 reference units; 6 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food417%
Altıkulaç et al. 2025217%
Ataee et al. 2016317%
Iyabo et al. 2015117%
Oladoye et al. 2016117%
Shivakumar et al. 2020317%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

6 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-4908922cca25:fd24833df971

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, canned

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤1.90.55–33.2 (bounded)1.9–52.4 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤1.90.55–33.2 (bounded)1.9–52.4 (bounded)

8 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study650%
Tokay 2022250%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-39b0ff3d8ad6:81088cfb79ec

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight. Legumes, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference150250400
Alternative weighting150250400

4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Alsabagh 20254100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-a38c626066c3:d549be156363

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, dried

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, dried. Legumes, dried; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference4.314.7719.3
Alternative weighting4.314.7719.3

4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Yu et al. 20234100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, dried on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Yu et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, dried on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-59617557ab92:8c7486b23722

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤52.4≤52.4≤52.4
Alternative weighting≤52.4≤52.4≤52.4

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-58b8671811b3:69d24d3531f6

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, cooked

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, cooked. Legumes, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤1≤1≤1
Alternative weighting≤1≤1≤1

3 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study250%
Spungen et al. 2024150%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-807bfee5c634:8de92ed7dac4

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes tAs reference · Legumes, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI legumes tAs reference · Legumes, as sold. Legumes, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤18.2≤18.8≤24
Alternative weighting≤18.2≤18.2≤24

179 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food17633%
EMRKB et al. 2019233%
Ventura et al. 2025133%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-f4a5b54d245a:07446d478ce7

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes tAs reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes tAs reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤2.7926–27.4 (bounded)52
Alternative weighting≤2.7926–27.4 (bounded)52

3 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Altıkulaç et al. 2025250%
Shivakumar et al. 2020150%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-4937fc569ca5:0c7b93d55d66

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes tAs reference · Legumes, canned

Reference and scope

HMI legumes tAs reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤3≤3≤3
Alternative weighting≤3≤3≤3

6 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study6100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-4ec6fdc9dd36:61eb78c7c07d

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes tAs reference · Legumes, dried

Reference and scope

HMI legumes tAs reference · Legumes, dried. Legumes, dried; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference36.139.87
Alternative weighting36.139.87

3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Yu et al. 20233100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, dried on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Yu et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, dried on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-5c49cb445c48:a3f6b7ba5cd3

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes tAs reference · Legumes, cooked

Reference and scope

HMI legumes tAs reference · Legumes, cooked. Legumes, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤3≤3≤3
Alternative weighting≤3≤3≤3

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study2100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, cooked on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-78d96be9ecc7:4d9b68e37112

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes iAs reference · Legumes, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI legumes iAs reference · Legumes, as sold. Legumes, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤5≤154.5–30 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤5≤1553.7

20 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food20100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-9d0f4e37ba0e:44a8681c4e3c

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes iAs reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes iAs reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference54.654.654.6
Alternative weighting54.654.654.6

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food1100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-c4b87f59318d:a4c5b149e34e

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes DMA reference · Legumes, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI legumes DMA reference · Legumes, as sold. Legumes, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤20≤20≤20
Alternative weighting≤20≤20≤20

4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food4100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-170991b7bcc5:4025e715e5df

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes tHg reference · Legumes, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI legumes tHg reference · Legumes, as sold. Legumes, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤0.12≤0.220.22–2 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤0.12≤0.220.22–2 (bounded)

105 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food10350%
Dabeka et al. 2003250%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-a93bbdaa023b:e5c8d3c93831

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes tHg reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes tHg reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference2122.524
Alternative weighting2122.524

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Shivakumar et al. 20202100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Shivakumar et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-39944a1ac77c:47db6f3694a6

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes tHg reference · Legumes, canned

Reference and scope

HMI legumes tHg reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤1≤1≤1
Alternative weighting≤1≤1≤1

6 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study6100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-c6834d0af013:6883aca611df

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes tHg reference · Legumes, cooked

Reference and scope

HMI legumes tHg reference · Legumes, cooked. Legumes, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤1≤1≤1
Alternative weighting≤1≤1≤1

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study2100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, cooked on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-1298495e43ac:84191f5830cb

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Ni reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Ni reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤0.66≤0.66≤0.66
Alternative weighting≤0.66≤0.66≤0.66

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Altıkulaç et al. 20252100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Altıkulaç et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-8366d16ea2d9:beeab70f6633

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Ni reference · Legumes, canned

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Ni reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference100–159 (bounded)210310
Alternative weighting100–159 (bounded)210310

8 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study650%
Tokay 2022250%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-b041adb218e2:1ed679768e77

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Ni reference · Legumes, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Ni reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference204372540
Alternative weighting204372540

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-06bd8c71f929:7bb44ab49791

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Ni reference · Legumes, cooked

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Ni reference · Legumes, cooked. Legumes, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference910920930
Alternative weighting910920930

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study2100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, cooked on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-d592f5511767:97d8910eeaf0

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Cr reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Cr reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference4899322230
Alternative weighting4899322230

6 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Altıkulaç et al. 2025250%
Shivakumar et al. 2020450%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-9c9b6ed4bfdc:6dbbdadad4ee

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Cr reference · Legumes, canned

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Cr reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤50≤65≤80
Alternative weighting≤50≤65≤80

8 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study650%
Tokay 2022250%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-15dca0f27ff3:79a9bf9b6b10

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Cr reference · Legumes, dried

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Cr reference · Legumes, dried. Legumes, dried; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference86113143
Alternative weighting86113143

4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Yu et al. 20234100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, dried on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Yu et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, dried on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-76feb2abc19e:2b78ce5fb719

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Cr reference · Legumes, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Cr reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤80≤80≤80
Alternative weighting≤80≤80≤80

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-6d8545df7c09:b2ea6f785922

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Cr reference · Legumes, cooked

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Cr reference · Legumes, cooked. Legumes, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤50≤50≤50
Alternative weighting≤50≤50≤50

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study2100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, cooked on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-c244be4ac097:d70879f04e10

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Al reference · Legumes, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Al reference · Legumes, as sold. Legumes, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference160016402130
Alternative weighting160018903210

5 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food5100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-a608e569fb02:ca65e0136a4c

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Al reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Al reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference69610001310
Alternative weighting69610001310

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Altıkulaç et al. 20252100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Altıkulaç et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-d3f61ca32433:05cd638e5ec1

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Al reference · Legumes, canned

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Al reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference3207501180
Alternative weighting3207501180

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-748495841df4:cf1798916c61

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Al reference · Legumes, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Al reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference72010301340
Alternative weighting72010301340

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-e9b5e9a93a58:e8e83ade5b63

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Sn reference · Legumes, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Sn reference · Legumes, as sold. Legumes, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤13.120–27 (bounded)38.5–44.6 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤13.120–23.5 (bounded)34.6–38.5 (bounded)

13 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food13100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-d3b90ce0cdb5:ffc1f0be7cf6

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes U reference · Legumes, canned

Reference and scope

HMI legumes U reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤1≤1≤1
Alternative weighting≤1≤1≤1

6 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study6100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-c1f104e4066e:67b69871324f

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes U reference · Legumes, cooked

Reference and scope

HMI legumes U reference · Legumes, cooked. Legumes, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤11–1.5 (bounded)2
Alternative weighting≤11–1.5 (bounded)2

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study2100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, cooked on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-d82cb27472cf:175644598496

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Co reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Co reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤0.34≤0.34≤0.34
Alternative weighting≤0.34≤0.34≤0.34

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Altıkulaç et al. 20252100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Altıkulaç et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-ce5b739133d1:8a606e519412

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Co reference · Legumes, canned

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Co reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤135≤135≤135
Alternative weighting≤135≤135≤135

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-dfb0a33b67df:0db1d858a8f2

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Co reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Co reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight. Legumes, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference700850950
Alternative weighting700850950

4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Alsabagh 20254100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-ad8d7bf3c9c1:49b296f0017a

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Co reference · Legumes, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Co reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤135≤135≤135
Alternative weighting≤135≤135≤135

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-29635b989aa0:d3acfaa13e11

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Cu reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Cu reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference29.5–29.8 (bounded)15306800
Alternative weighting29.5–29.8 (bounded)15306800

9 reference units; 4 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Altıkulaç et al. 2025225%
Iyabo et al. 2015225%
Oladoye et al. 2016125%
Shivakumar et al. 2020425%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

4 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-f38963895ab2:09e6e2e8ecf3

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Cu reference · Legumes, canned

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Cu reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference78024704160
Alternative weighting78024704160

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-dafa473b1dac:e4c12ce13950

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Cu reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Cu reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight. Legumes, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference6300960011800
Alternative weighting6300960011800

3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Alsabagh 20253100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-26e5c6249a8c:96672537ec5a

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Cu reference · Legumes, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Cu reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference98037106440
Alternative weighting98037106440

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-cf5253c9ead8:f2c1725c1c6c

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Fe reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Fe reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference293005230059300
Alternative weighting293005230059300

3 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Altıkulaç et al. 2025250%
Oladoye et al. 2016150%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-093374632670:c19cc4e7e5b0

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Fe reference · Legumes, canned

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Fe reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference153001710018800
Alternative weighting153001710018800

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-480d83cb0920:846a9427c0f8

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Fe reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Fe reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight. Legumes, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference318003750042600
Alternative weighting318003750042600

4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Alsabagh 20254100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-b825cc73d3f4:0ce22a35961d

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Fe reference · Legumes, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Fe reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference104002130032200
Alternative weighting104002130032200

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-bf7cdb80e45d:61fa77b00767

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Mn reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Mn reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference179019502120
Alternative weighting179019502120

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Altıkulaç et al. 20252100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Altıkulaç et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-6c255283bc21:9cb0173bb5d3

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Mn reference · Legumes, canned

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Mn reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference99017102430
Alternative weighting99017102430

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-8ce505cd7b07:b6d633dbc1bb

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Mn reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Mn reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight. Legumes, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference490064007850
Alternative weighting490064007850

4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Alsabagh 20254100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-868149d33137:a340d9e25f51

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Mn reference · Legumes, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Mn reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference179033904990
Alternative weighting179033904990

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-a20440549f73:5afb58e8e630

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Zn reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Zn reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference741221013200
Alternative weighting741221013200

4 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Altıkulaç et al. 2025250%
Iyabo et al. 2015250%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-660964ec8c81:5a4ae93a348c

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Zn reference · Legumes, canned

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Zn reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference165043307000
Alternative weighting165043307000

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-503e9e147d91:5f98028be5e0

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Zn reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Zn reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight. Legumes, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference341003860039000
Alternative weighting341003860039000

3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Alsabagh 20253100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-4a114c4e065f:f762ba68528e

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Zn reference · Legumes, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Zn reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference2290847014600
Alternative weighting2290847014600

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-cc492289eacf:7d024e4752bd

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes V reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes V reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤6.08≤6.08≤6.08
Alternative weighting≤6.08≤6.08≤6.08

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Altıkulaç et al. 20252100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Altıkulaç et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-b9df89c1b704:2ef203ae121d

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes V reference · Legumes, canned

Reference and scope

HMI legumes V reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤64.1≤64.1≤64.1
Alternative weighting≤64.1≤64.1≤64.1

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-692a244361cb:721a951b3b2c

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes V reference · Legumes, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI legumes V reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤64.1≤64.1≤64.1
Alternative weighting≤64.1≤64.1≤64.1

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-22a784db13c3:318c0bd045db

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Se reference · Legumes, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Se reference · Legumes, as sold. Legumes, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤48≤48≤48
Alternative weighting≤48≤48≤48

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Ventura et al. 20251100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Ventura et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-0940c0870cc7:7717777b66f2

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes B reference · Legumes, canned

Reference and scope

HMI legumes B reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤219≤219≤219
Alternative weighting≤219≤219≤219

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-0dddfe43b9c7:f85ba9ea53c9

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes B reference · Legumes, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI legumes B reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference120039906780
Alternative weighting120039906780

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-6f3da8978cb5:02458f1790dd

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Ba reference · Legumes, canned

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Ba reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference340360380
Alternative weighting340360380

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-8ddbe5d7a4f1:68569d631141

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Ba reference · Legumes, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Ba reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference410445480
Alternative weighting410445480

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-24db24a4462a:938afcb9653a

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Ca reference · Legumes, canned

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Ca reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference350000413000475000
Alternative weighting350000413000475000

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-9e8dd739a292:d1f470644595

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Ca reference · Legumes, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Ca reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference435000488000541000
Alternative weighting435000488000541000

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-dbe19a410f11:fa20933f0ffb

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes I reference · Legumes, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI legumes I reference · Legumes, as sold. Legumes, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤8.6≤8.6≤8.6
Alternative weighting≤8.6≤8.6≤8.6

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Ventura et al. 20251100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Ventura et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-6644197d1224:87f5de83017d

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Mg reference · Legumes, canned

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Mg reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference154000191000228000
Alternative weighting154000191000228000

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-3fbfff81f0f2:6ebb46c441e8

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Mg reference · Legumes, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Mg reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference209000500000791000
Alternative weighting209000500000791000

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-93b419a69183:b58012fd2989

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Mo reference · Legumes, canned

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Mo reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference38415402700
Alternative weighting38415402700

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-0b4f1dc8f115:e9777aeaeabd

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Mo reference · Legumes, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Mo reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤1092120–2170 (bounded)4240
Alternative weighting≤1092120–2170 (bounded)4240

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Tokay 20222100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-bb864cde9ee3:43fb45da5787

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Sr reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Sr reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference44601110017700
Alternative weighting44601110017700

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Altıkulaç et al. 20252100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Altıkulaç et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-d15d82292aca:e67d339537ed

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI legumes Ti reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI legumes Ti reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference77310401300
Alternative weighting77310401300

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Altıkulaç et al. 20252100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Altıkulaç et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-2fb4d97d6bd3:2f210eb7a24d

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

1 dataset

How metals reach legumes

No study in the library compared legumes from contaminated and ordinary settings, so the routes by which metals reach it are not measured here.

Which forms and regions measured lower

For cadmium, the HMI reference median was lowest for legumes, dried (4.77 µg/kg) and highest for legumes, canned (250 µg/kg); forms differ in water content, so this compares foods as sold or eaten, not uptake.7Yu S, Pan XD, Han JL · 2023Toxic Elements in Beans from Zhejiang, Southeast China: Distribution and Probabilistic Health Risk AssessmentFoodsRead source →11Alsabagh AAA · 2025Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlnakhla Journal of ScienceRead source → The HMI reference for lead in legumes, as sold pools 26 subgroup units from 5 sampling families, with a median of below 5.1 µg/kg and a middle half spanning below 0.83 (lower quartile) and 82 µg/kg (upper quartile).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →24Altıkulaç A, Turhan Ş, Altuner EM, Şekeroğlu B, Kurnaz A · 2025Evaluation of Health Risks Associated with Potential Toxic Elements in Selected Vegetables Consumed in the Western Black Sea Region of TurkeyACS Omega 2025, 10, 8843-8858Read source →25Mari Ataee, Toraj Ahmadi-Jouibari, Nazir Fattahi · 2016Application of microwave-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry for ultra-trace determination of lead and cadmium in cereals and agricultural productsInternational Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry 96(3):271-283Read source →26Iyabo OO, Ogundiran MB, Adebayo OL · 2015Toxic and Essential Metals in Staple Foods Commonly Consumed by Students in Ekiti State, South West, NigeriaInternational Journal of ChemistryRead source →27Shivakumar L, Reddy KR, Kalshetty BM · 2020Heavy Metal Contaminations and Health Risk Assessment from Fruits and Vegetables in Bangalore Rural Markets, Karnataka, IndiaRasayan Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2498-2507Read source → For lead in legumes, canned, the reference median was below 4 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 4 to below 110 µg/kg across 10 units.2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →28Spungen JH, et al. · 2024Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →29Tokay F · 2022Determination of Some Elements in Canned and Frozen Vegetables Sold in Balıkesir (Türkiye) Markets and Nutritional AssessmentAdıyaman University Journal of Science (ADYU J SCI) 12(2), 230-243Read source → For lead in legumes, as sold, the reference median was between 400 and 520 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 12.3 to between 835 and 1,150 µg/kg across 417 units.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →30Stančić Z, Vujević D, Gomaz A, Bogdan S, Vincek D · 2016Detection of heavy metals in common vegetables at Varaždin City Market, CroatiaArhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju (Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology) 2016;67:340-350Read source →

Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, legumes, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (1.1 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (90 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in AFRO (1 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (43 µg/kg).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For total arsenic, the lowest regional median was in WPRO (1 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (16.1 µg/kg).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

Targeted legumes, as sold samples in EURO had aluminium lower at 1,410 µg/kg, against 1,870 µg/kg for EURO in the same study.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

In one study, lead across 18 groups of legumes ranged from 1.1 µg/kg (PAHO) to 90 µg/kg (WPRO); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In another study, lead across 5 groups of legumes ranged from 120 µg/kg (Ottawa 1985 (preliminary study)) to 332 µg/kg (Montreal 1988); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.31Dabeka RW, McKenzie AD · 1995Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Journal of AOAC InternationalRead source →

Processing, cooking and preparation

Processed or prepared forms were compared only with unprocessed legumes in the same study and group. Legumes, canned (Legume, Riyadh city markets, May 2009) had lead higher at 19 µg/kg, against 14 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (legumes, as sold).32Al Othman ZA · 2010Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakeMolecules 2010, 15, 7482-7497Read source → In another study, legumes, canned (5 city composites) had lead higher at 152 µg/kg, against 21.7 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (legumes, as sold).31Dabeka RW, McKenzie AD · 1995Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Journal of AOAC InternationalRead source → A third study found that legumes, dried (all samples (both areas)) had lead lower at 54 µg/kg, against 55.7 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (legumes, as sold).33Wang B, Liu Y, Wang H, Cui L, Zhang Z, Guo J, Liu S, Cui W · 2020Contamination and health risk assessment of lead, arsenic, cadmium, and aluminum from a total diet study of Jilin Province, ChinaFood Science & NutritionRead source →

Forms differ in water content, so a per-kilogram difference is not by itself a measured removal or gain of metal.

Mitigation for legumes

Lot testing against the applicable limit is the check that can be verified.

No measured way to lower metals in this food is in the library yet.

Trade-offs and limits of controls

Metals do not move together, so a lot that passes a lead limit says little about cadmium, arsenic or nickel unless those are tested as well.

Testing legumes for metals

Results depend on the method and its reporting limit. Reporting limits for lead ranged from 0.045 µg/kg (Kharkwal et al. 2023) to 3,000 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →19Kharkwal V, Choudhary M, Bains K, Bishnoi M · 2023Non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risk assessment of heavy metals in cooked beans and vegetables in Punjab, North IndiaFood Science & NutritionRead source → Reporting limits for cadmium ranged from 0.006 µg/kg (Kharkwal et al. 2023) to 1,000 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →19Kharkwal V, Choudhary M, Bains K, Bishnoi M · 2023Non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risk assessment of heavy metals in cooked beans and vegetables in Punjab, North IndiaFood Science & NutritionRead source → Reporting limits for total arsenic ranged from 0.009 µg/kg (Kharkwal et al. 2023) to 2,500 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →19Kharkwal V, Choudhary M, Bains K, Bishnoi M · 2023Non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risk assessment of heavy metals in cooked beans and vegetables in Punjab, North IndiaFood Science & NutritionRead source →

A useful lot result names the form, the basis and a quantification limit well below the limit that applies.

Buying and verifying legumes

No maximum level for metals in legumes was verified from primary text for this page; buyers should confirm the limit that applies in the destination market.

Exposure from legumes

No source in the library converted legumes concentrations into a verified estimate of intake for a defined population. Concentrations describe the food, not individual risk.

Evidence review and remaining gaps

Every source record that names legumes was decided on its content: 90 occurrence extracted, 90 records in all. The occurrence table renders every extracted result; held values remain visible with their reason.

References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.

Legumes FAQs

What heavy metals are found in legumes?

The library reports lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, monomethylarsonic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ag, As, B, Ba, Ca, Hg, I, K, Mg, Mo, Na, Sr, Ti and Tl in legumes, most often lead, cadmium and total arsenic.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Abdolahpour Alamdari H, Sleman Ali H, Sadighara P, Jahed Khaniki G, Shahsavanpoor Landeh K, Dehghani MH · 2023The health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables grown in Babol city, IranInternational Archives of Health SciencesRead source →4ANSES · 2026Opinion of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety on the results of the Third French Total Diet Study (TDS3) - Acrylamide, aluminium, silver, cadmium, mercury and leadANSES Opinion, Request No 2019-SA-0010Read source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in legumes, as sold from 6,059 results in 5 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 1.1 to 430 µg/kg.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

Which types of legumes have the lowest levels?

For cadmium, the HMI reference median was lowest for legumes, dried (4.77 µg/kg) and highest for legumes, canned (250 µg/kg); forms differ in water content, so this compares foods as sold or eaten, not uptake.7Yu S, Pan XD, Han JL · 2023Toxic Elements in Beans from Zhejiang, Southeast China: Distribution and Probabilistic Health Risk AssessmentFoodsRead source →11Alsabagh AAA · 2025Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlnakhla Journal of ScienceRead source →

Which regions report the lowest levels in legumes?

Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, legumes, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (1.1 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (90 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in AFRO (1 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (43 µg/kg).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

Does processing change heavy metals in legumes?

Only comparisons between forms in the same study are available, not before-and-after measurements of the same legumes.32Al Othman ZA · 2010Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakeMolecules 2010, 15, 7482-7497Read source → Legumes, canned (Legume, Riyadh city markets, May 2009) had lead higher at 19 µg/kg, against 14 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (legumes, as sold).32Al Othman ZA · 2010Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakeMolecules 2010, 15, 7482-7497Read source →

How much of the arsenic in legumes is inorganic?

Inorganic arsenic, the more toxic form, was measured in 37 results from 6 sources, far fewer than total arsenic.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →34Laizu J · 2007Speciation of arsenic in vegetables and their correlation with inorganic phosphate levelBangladesh Journal of Pharmacology 2007; 2: 88-94Read source →35Marín S, Pardo O, Sánchez A, Sanchis Y, Vélez D, Devesa V, Font G, Yusà V · 2018Assessment of metal levels in foodstuffs from the Region of Valencia (Spain)Toxicology Reports 5 (2018) 654-670Read source →36Centre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR · 2012The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →37European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) · 2014Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597Read source →38Baxter M, Brereton N · 2015Total Diet Study of metals and other elements in foodFood and Environment Research Agency report for the UK Food Standards Agency, Fera report 15/06, project FS102081Read source → Across 2 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported inorganic arsenic means and medians on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis ranged from 4.9 µg/kg (Marín et al. 2018) to 800 µg/kg (Laizu 2007).34Laizu J · 2007Speciation of arsenic in vegetables and their correlation with inorganic phosphate levelBangladesh Journal of Pharmacology 2007; 2: 88-94Read source →35Marín S, Pardo O, Sánchez A, Sanchis Y, Vélez D, Devesa V, Font G, Yusà V · 2018Assessment of metal levels in foodstuffs from the Region of Valencia (Spain)Toxicology Reports 5 (2018) 654-670Read source →

References

Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.

  1. GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsWorld Health Organization · GEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment Programme · 2026 · extranet.who.intDataset
  2. FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsU.S. Food and Drug Administration · FDA Total Diet Study · 2022 · www.fda.govDataset
  3. The health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables grown in Babol city, IranAbdolahpour Alamdari H, Sleman Ali H, Sadighara P, Jahed Khaniki G, Shahsavanpoor Landeh K, and Dehghani MH · International Archives of Health Sciences · 2023 · doi.org/10.48307/IAHSJ.2023.177176Peer-reviewed
  4. Opinion of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety on the results of the Third French Total Diet Study (TDS3) - Acrylamide, aluminium, silver, cadmium, mercury and leadANSES · 2026Government
  5. Detection of Heavy Metals in Some EdibleUnknown authors · Peer-reviewed article · 2024 · doi.org/10.4314/dujopas.v10i1b.13Peer-reviewed
  6. Anodic Stripping Voltammetry for Simultaneous Determination of Heavy Metals in VegetablesBanyen S · KMITL Science Journal (Ladkrabang) 22(1), January-June 2556 B.E., pp. 84-99 · 2013 · li01.tci-thaijo.orgPeer-reviewed
  7. Toxic Elements in Beans from Zhejiang, Southeast China: Distribution and Probabilistic Health Risk AssessmentYu S, Pan XD, and Han JL · Foods · 2023 · doi.org/10.3390/foods12173300Peer-reviewed
  8. Human health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables of BangladeshChowdhury AI, Shill LC, Raihan MM, Rashid R, Bhuiyan MNH, Reza S, et al. · Scientific Reports 2024, 14: 15616 · 2024 · doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65734-6Peer-reviewed
  9. Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthGuerra F, Trevizam AR, Muraoka T, Marcante NC, and Canniatti-Brazaca SG · Scientia Agricola 69(1):54-60 · 2012 · doi.org/10.1590/s0103-90162012000100008Peer-reviewed
  10. Essentail and Toxic Metals in Lebanese Marketed Canned Food: Impact of Metal CansKorfali SI and Abou Hamdan W · Journal of Food Research 2(1) (2013) 19-30 · 2013 · doi.org/10.5539/jfr.v2n1p19Peer-reviewed
  11. Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlsabagh AAA · Alnakhla Journal of Science · 2025 · doi.org/10.63799/AJOS/14.2.7Peer-reviewed
  12. Probabilistic assessment of the cumulative risk from dietary heavy metal exposure in Chongqing, China using a hazard-driven approachChen J, Chen J, Li M, Feng P, Qin M, Chen T, et al. · Scientific Reports 15:2229 · 2025 · doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83299-2Peer-reviewed
  13. Assessment of heavy metal levels and associated health risks linked to vegetables grown in Noakhali region of BangladeshKawsar Hossen, Nahian Rahman, Zannatul Ferdowsi, and Tahmina Ferdous · Environmental Health Insights · 2026 · doi.org/10.1177/11786302261440637Peer-reviewed
  14. Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportAhn, Timothy, Chaney, Rufus L., DiBartolomeis, Michael J., and Ramtahal, Gideon · Expert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments) · 2022Industry
  15. Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in AlgeriaCherfi A, Abdoun S, and Gaci O · Food and Chemical Toxicology · 2014 · doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2014.04.044Peer-reviewed
  16. Analysis of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs and an Assessment of the Health Risks to the General Public via Consumption in Beijing, ChinaLiang G, Gong W, Li B, Zuo J, Pan L, and Liu X · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2019 · doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16060909Peer-reviewed
  17. Evaluation of Some Toxic Heavy Metals in Rice and Beans Samples Cultivated in Yobe State, NigeriaUsman MI, Gadaka MA, and Maazu AB · East African Journal of Health and Science 2021, 3(1): 145-151 · 2021 · doi.org/10.37284/eajhs.3.1.396Peer-reviewed
  18. Heavy Metal Exposure from FoodsMahaffey KR, Corneliussen PE, Jelinek CF, and Fiorino JA · Environmental Health Perspectives · 1975Peer-reviewed
  19. Non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risk assessment of heavy metals in cooked beans and vegetables in Punjab, North IndiaKharkwal V, Choudhary M, Bains K, and Bishnoi M · Food Science & Nutrition · 2023 · doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3678Peer-reviewed
  20. Contamination of Heavy Metal(Loid)S in Cereals, Vegetables, and Legumes Purchased from Local Markets of Jiaozuo, China and The Associated Health Risk AssessmentWu Z · International Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, 2(1): 180-200 · 2024 · doi.org/10.62051/10.62051/ijnres.v2n1.21Peer-reviewed
  21. Health Risk Assessment of Potentially Toxic Elements in Canned Pinto Beans and Fava Beans Distributed in Gilan Province of IranValizadeh Moghadam Jirandehi H, Nourieh N, Yazdanfar N, and Kashi G · Scientific Reports (published 2023; open access) · 2023 · doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34271-1Peer-reviewed
  22. Determination of some heavy metals and their potential risk in selected vegetables on sale within Kaduna Metropolis, Kaduna State, NigeriaImongben CO, Tomori WB, Umoru PE, and Oyerinde WA · World Nutrition · 2026 · doi.org/10.26596/wn.20261718-18Peer-reviewed
  23. Determination of trace element levels in flowers and leaves of vicia faba by ICP-MSBulduk Ibrahim · Progress in Chemical and Biochemical Research · 2020 · doi.org/10.33945/SAMI/PCBR.2020.3.4Peer-reviewed
  24. Evaluation of Health Risks Associated with Potential Toxic Elements in Selected Vegetables Consumed in the Western Black Sea Region of TurkeyAltıkulaç A, Turhan Ş, Altuner EM, Şekeroğlu B, and Kurnaz A · ACS Omega 2025, 10, 8843-8858 · 2025 · doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c08152Peer-reviewed
  25. Application of microwave-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry for ultra-trace determination of lead and cadmium in cereals and agricultural productsMari Ataee, Toraj Ahmadi-Jouibari, and Nazir Fattahi · International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry 96(3):271-283 · 2016 · doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2016.1150464Peer-reviewed
  26. Toxic and Essential Metals in Staple Foods Commonly Consumed by Students in Ekiti State, South West, NigeriaIyabo OO, Ogundiran MB, and Adebayo OL · International Journal of Chemistry · 2015 · doi.org/10.5539/ijc.v7n1p155Peer-reviewed
  27. Heavy Metal Contaminations and Health Risk Assessment from Fruits and Vegetables in Bangalore Rural Markets, Karnataka, IndiaShivakumar L, Reddy KR, and Kalshetty BM · Rasayan Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2498-2507 · 2020 · doi.org/10.31788/rjc.2020.1346039Peer-reviewed
  28. Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Spungen JH and et al. · Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A · 2024 · doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2024.2396910Peer-reviewed
  29. Determination of Some Elements in Canned and Frozen Vegetables Sold in Balıkesir (Türkiye) Markets and Nutritional AssessmentTokay F · Adıyaman University Journal of Science (ADYU J SCI) 12(2), 230-243 · 2022 · doi.org/10.37094/adyujsci.1181786Peer-reviewed
  30. Detection of heavy metals in common vegetables at Varaždin City Market, CroatiaStančić Z, Vujević D, Gomaz A, Bogdan S, and Vincek D · Arhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju (Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology) 2016;67:340-350 · 2016 · doi.org/10.1515/aiht-2016-67-2823Peer-reviewed
  31. Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Dabeka RW and McKenzie AD · Journal of AOAC International · 1995 · academic.oup.comPeer-reviewed
  32. Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakeAl Othman ZA · Molecules 2010, 15, 7482-7497 · 2010 · doi.org/10.3390/molecules15107482Peer-reviewed
  33. Contamination and health risk assessment of lead, arsenic, cadmium, and aluminum from a total diet study of Jilin Province, ChinaWang B, Liu Y, Wang H, Cui L, Zhang Z, Guo J, et al. · Food Science & Nutrition · 2020 · doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1851Peer-reviewed
  34. Speciation of arsenic in vegetables and their correlation with inorganic phosphate levelLaizu J · Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology 2007; 2: 88-94 · 2007 · doi.org/10.3329/bjp.v2i2.576Peer-reviewed
  35. Assessment of metal levels in foodstuffs from the Region of Valencia (Spain)Marín S, Pardo O, Sánchez A, Sanchis Y, Vélez D, Devesa V, et al. · Toxicology Reports 5 (2018) 654-670 · 2018 · doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.05.005Peer-reviewed
  36. The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR · Centre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region · 2012 · www.cfs.gov.hkGovernment
  37. Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) · EFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597 · 2014 · doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3597Government
  38. Total Diet Study of metals and other elements in foodBaxter M and Brereton N · Food and Environment Research Agency report for the UK Food Standards Agency, Fera report 15/06, project FS102081 · 2015 · www.food.gov.ukGovernment

Sources

Browse Legumes Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.

Update history

22 October 2026: Rebuilt from every legumes record in the library: 90 occurrence sources, references by form and basis, same-study contrasts.