Legumes in the HMI library has 1,378 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, monomethylarsonic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ag, arsenic (As), B, Ba, Ca, mercury (Hg), I, K, Mg, Mo, Na, Sr, Ti and Tl from 90 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3The health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables grown in Babol city, IranInternational Archives of Health SciencesRead source →4Opinion of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety on the results of the Third French Total Diet Study (TDS3) - Acrylamide, aluminium, silver, cadmium, mercury and leadANSES Opinion, Request No 2019-SA-0010Read source →5Detection of Heavy Metals in Some EdiblePeer-reviewed articleRead source →6Anodic Stripping Voltammetry for Simultaneous Determination of Heavy Metals in VegetablesKMITL Science Journal (Ladkrabang) 22(1), January-June 2556 B.E., pp. 84-99Read source →
-
Metals measured:
Lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid and monomethylarsonic acid and others, in 1,378 results from 90 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3The health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables grown in Babol city, IranInternational Archives of Health SciencesRead source →4Opinion of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety on the results of the Third French Total Diet Study (TDS3) - Acrylamide, aluminium, silver, cadmium, mercury and leadANSES Opinion, Request No 2019-SA-0010Read source →
-
Main drivers:
Form, basis and where the legumes was sampled; reporting limits decide how many results are non-detects.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3The health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables grown in Babol city, IranInternational Archives of Health SciencesRead source →4Opinion of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety on the results of the Third French Total Diet Study (TDS3) - Acrylamide, aluminium, silver, cadmium, mercury and leadANSES Opinion, Request No 2019-SA-0010Read source →
-
Practical framing:
Ask for lot results with a quantification limit well below the limit that applies in the destination market.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3The health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables grown in Babol city, IranInternational Archives of Health SciencesRead source →4Opinion of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety on the results of the Third French Total Diet Study (TDS3) - Acrylamide, aluminium, silver, cadmium, mercury and leadANSES Opinion, Request No 2019-SA-0010Read source →
Legumes overview
Legumes in the HMI library has 1,378 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, monomethylarsonic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ag, As, B, Ba, Ca, Hg, I, K, Mg, Mo, Na, Sr, Ti and Tl from 90 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3The health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables grown in Babol city, IranInternational Archives of Health SciencesRead source →4Opinion of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety on the results of the Third French Total Diet Study (TDS3) - Acrylamide, aluminium, silver, cadmium, mercury and leadANSES Opinion, Request No 2019-SA-0010Read source →5Detection of Heavy Metals in Some EdiblePeer-reviewed articleRead source →6Anodic Stripping Voltammetry for Simultaneous Determination of Heavy Metals in VegetablesKMITL Science Journal (Ladkrabang) 22(1), January-June 2556 B.E., pp. 84-99Read source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in legumes, as sold from 6,059 results in 5 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 1.1 to 430 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In the US Total Diet Study, legumes, canned had a median lead result below 4 µg/kg across 3 composites from 2018–2020.2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →
Across 12 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported lead means and medians on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis ranged from 4.5 µg/kg (Yu et al. 2023) to 12,600 µg/kg (Chowdhury et al. 2024).7Toxic Elements in Beans from Zhejiang, Southeast China: Distribution and Probabilistic Health Risk AssessmentFoodsRead source →8Human health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables of BangladeshScientific Reports 2024, 14: 15616Read source → For cadmium, 18 studies on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis reported means and medians from 2 µg/kg (Guerra et al. 2012) to 300 µg/kg (Korfali et al. 2013).9Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →10Essentail and Toxic Metals in Lebanese Marketed Canned Food: Impact of Metal CansJournal of Food Research 2(1) (2013) 19-30Read source →
For a buyer the practical points are the form bought, the basis a result is reported on, where the legumes came from and the laboratory’s reporting limit. Testing finds contamination but does not remove it.
What counts as legumes
This page covers legumes in 6 forms kept separate in every comparison: legumes, as sold (1,013 results), legumes, canned (164 results), legumes, dried (137 results), legumes, frozen (32 results), legumes, cooked (29 results) and legumes, oil (3 results).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3The health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables grown in Babol city, IranInternational Archives of Health SciencesRead source →4Opinion of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety on the results of the Third French Total Diet Study (TDS3) - Acrylamide, aluminium, silver, cadmium, mercury and leadANSES Opinion, Request No 2019-SA-0010Read source →5Detection of Heavy Metals in Some EdiblePeer-reviewed articleRead source →6Anodic Stripping Voltammetry for Simultaneous Determination of Heavy Metals in VegetablesKMITL Science Journal (Ladkrabang) 22(1), January-June 2556 B.E., pp. 84-99Read source →
Results stay on the basis each source reports: as sold or fresh weight, dry weight, or unstated. Dry-weight, as-sold and unstated results are never pooled, and no moisture conversion is applied.
Heavy metal contamination profile of legumes
The table holds every extracted legumes result: one row for each statistic a source reports for a form, group and metal, 1,378 rows in all, grouped by metal and form; percentiles, ranges and maxima for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3The health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables grown in Babol city, IranInternational Archives of Health SciencesRead source →4Opinion of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety on the results of the Third French Total Diet Study (TDS3) - Acrylamide, aluminium, silver, cadmium, mercury and leadANSES Opinion, Request No 2019-SA-0010Read source →5Detection of Heavy Metals in Some EdiblePeer-reviewed articleRead source →6Anodic Stripping Voltammetry for Simultaneous Determination of Heavy Metals in VegetablesKMITL Science Journal (Ladkrabang) 22(1), January-June 2556 B.E., pp. 84-99Read source → Monitoring medians are HMI calculations from individual submissions; non-detects remain intervals between zero and the reporting limit and are never read as zero.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
273 rows can be rated against an HMI reference for the same form and basis, 62 rows have a direct same-study comparison, and the rest stay unrated with the reason recorded. 65 values from 16 sources failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.3The health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables grown in Babol city, IranInternational Archives of Health SciencesRead source →5Detection of Heavy Metals in Some EdiblePeer-reviewed articleRead source →7Toxic Elements in Beans from Zhejiang, Southeast China: Distribution and Probabilistic Health Risk AssessmentFoodsRead source →11Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlnakhla Journal of ScienceRead source →12Probabilistic assessment of the cumulative risk from dietary heavy metal exposure in Chongqing, China using a hazard-driven approachScientific Reports 15:2229Read source →13Assessment of heavy metal levels and associated health risks linked to vegetables grown in Noakhali region of BangladeshEnvironmental Health InsightsRead source →14Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportExpert Committee report submitted to As You Sow and the Settling Defendants under a California Proposition 65 Consent Judgment; Project Manager: Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). Final Report dated March 28, 2022 (381 pp., including three technical attachments).Read source →15Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in AlgeriaFood and Chemical ToxicologyRead source →16Analysis of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs and an Assessment of the Health Risks to the General Public via Consumption in Beijing, ChinaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthRead source →17Evaluation of Some Toxic Heavy Metals in Rice and Beans Samples Cultivated in Yobe State, Nigeria.East African Journal of Health and Science 2021, 3(1): 145-151Read source →18Heavy Metal Exposure from FoodsEnvironmental Health PerspectivesRead source →19Non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risk assessment of heavy metals in cooked beans and vegetables in Punjab, North IndiaFood Science & NutritionRead source →20Contamination of Heavy Metal(Loid)S in Cereals, Vegetables, and Legumes Purchased from Local Markets of Jiaozuo, China and The Associated Health Risk AssessmentInternational Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, 2(1): 180-200Read source →21Health Risk Assessment of Potentially Toxic Elements in Canned Pinto Beans and Fava Beans Distributed in Gilan Province of IranScientific Reports (published 2023; open access)Read source →22Determination of some heavy metals and their potential risk in selected vegetables on sale within Kaduna Metropolis, Kaduna State, NigeriaWorld NutritionRead source →23Determination of trace element levels in flowers and leaves of vicia faba by ICP-MSProgress in Chemical and Biochemical ResearchRead source →
Comparison methods and scope
Each row is one statistic a source reports for one form of legumes, group and metal; percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Different forms and preparation states are kept apart, and dry-weight results never share a reference with as-sold or fresh-weight results. Ratings place a result against an HMI reference built from monitoring results and ordinary-setting medians for the same form and basis. Same-study contrasts compare a contaminated or treated site with its control, targeted with random sampling, a prepared form with the unprocessed one, or one group of a study with the median of its other groups. Held rows failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.
First displayed analyte: Lead: 300 findings from 62 sources. Each row retains its statistic and measurement basis.
Filter findings
1219 of 1219 findings · 34 analytes
About this table
| Food form | Collection scope | Finding (µg/kg) | Comparison | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
222 findings · 52 studies · 16 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | AFRO2018 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | AFRO2018 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2008–2009 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2001–2005 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2009–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2001 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2008–2018 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2001–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2010–2018 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2011–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2010 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2001 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2008 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2000–2010 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2000–2002 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO1995–2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2012–2015 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2006–2010 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2000–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2011–2012 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2002–2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2015 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014–2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014–2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2009–2013 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013–2015 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2015 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013–2015 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2015 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013–2015 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2015 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013–2015 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2000–2002 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO1995–2012 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2011–2012 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2006–2010 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2000–2005 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2008 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2009–2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2012 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2009–2012 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2009–2011 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2014 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2010–2011 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2011 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2012–2014 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2012 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005–2013 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2002 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2009 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000–2008 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2002 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2012–2014 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2014 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2014 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2012 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2013 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2012 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2012 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2013 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2007–2008 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2007–2014 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2009 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000–2002 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005–2009 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2008 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAbdolahpour et al. 2023 | Babol County fields2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldANSES 2026 | all samples (organic and conventional)2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Central market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Central market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBanyen 2013 | Hua Takhe fresh market, Bangkok2011 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBanyen 2013 | Hua Takhe fresh market, Bangkok2011 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022 | amateur farmers; washed with tap water2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025 | Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025 | Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025 | Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | pod vegetable, three local markets, Noakhali district2022 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHossen et al. 2026 | farm 22024 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | mean.Same samples: 38 µg/kg (minimum); 69 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | single sample exceeding EU maximum level, Varaždin market2013 | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | single sample exceeding EU maximum level, Varaždin market2013 | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | mean.Same samples: 80 µg/kg (minimum); 520 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, as soldWu 2024 | all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 10–380 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Legumes, as soldWu 2024 | all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreported | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2016–2017Dry weight | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2012–2015Dry weight | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2015Dry weight | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2012Dry weight | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2011–2015Dry weight | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2015Dry weight | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2015Dry weight | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013–2015Dry weight | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2015Dry weight | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2011–2015Dry weight | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAhn et al. 2022 | Arevalo-Gardini 2016/2017 Peru (C.2 second entry)2015–2020Dry weight | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAhn et al. 2022 | Danquah 2015 Ghana, mining districts2015–2020Dry weight | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAhn et al. 2022 | Nigeria, six farms (Rankin 2005)2015–2020Dry weight | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAhn et al. 2022 | Ubilla 2018 Ecuador, 25 organic producers2015–2020Dry weight | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAl 2010 | Legume, Riyadh city markets, May 20092009Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026 | leafy vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAtaee et al. 2016 | local market 1, KermanshahCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAtaee et al. 2016 | local market 2, KermanshahCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAtaee et al. 2016 | local market 3, KermanshahCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBrima et al. 2025 | Legumes (N=14)2023–2024Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCherfi et al. 2014 | Boumerdes wholesale markets2012Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldIslam et al. 2018 | industrial vicinity, Tangail2016Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 4,710–8,740 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Legumes, as soldIslam et al. 2018 | industrial vicinity, Tangail2016Dry weight | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldIyabo et al. 2015 | legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldIyabo et al. 2015 | legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLiang et al. 2019 | Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldOladoye et al. 2016 | natural spice, Odo-Ori Market sample Spice-32015Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldOrisakwe et al. 2012 | all samples (Ohaji, Umuagwo, Owerri sites)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldPirsaheb et al. 2015 | all brands, domestic and imported2014Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSalama et al. 2005 | legume, markets in five districts of AlexandriaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSalama et al. 2005 | legume, markets in five districts of AlexandriaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSharma et al. 2022 | four market sites, Bareilly city (pooled)2018Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSilva et al. 2026 | Badulla (vegetable-paddy rotation, Ultisol)2018–2020Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021 | Zone A farm harvest composite (ZAB)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021 | Zone B farm harvest composite (ZBB)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021 | Zone C farm harvest composite (ZCB)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldZubairu et al. 2025 | improved variety, Challawa industrial areaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAbbas et al. 2010 | fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C9), measured by flame AASCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C9), measured by ICP-AESCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C18), measured by ICP-AESCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2012 | Pulses (beans), farm samples from main producing regions across2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCantoral et al. 2024 | Legumes (retail, Mexico City)2022–2023Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCantoral et al. 2024 | Legumes (retail, Mexico City)2022–2023Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChaura et al. 2026 | accession G3645 'Jamapa'Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 9 µg/kg (minimum); 39.8 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Vegetables2000–2009Basis not stated | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Vegetables2000–2009Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Vegetables2000–2009Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 0 µg/kg (percentile); 70.1 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Vegetables2000–2009Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Vegetables2000–2009Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Vegetables2000–2009Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Vegetables2000–2009Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 5.4 µg/kg (percentile); 200 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Vegetables2000–2009Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Vegetables2000–2009Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, as soldFerreira et al. 2021 | Bahia,BrazilCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldFerreira et al. 2021 | Bahia,BrazilCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldlyu 2022 | national2016–2019Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 4.7–34.9 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Legumes, as soldlyu 2022 | national2016–2019Basis not stated | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMahaffey et al. 1975 | US market baskets, all regions1968–1974Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022 | Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022 | Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022 | Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldOliveira 2020 | Bahia,BrazilCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldOliveira 2020 | Bahia,BrazilCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldRomán-Ochoa et al. 2021 | all samples of this type2019Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 1 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 2 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 3 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2019 | all samples (Guangzhou, 2014-2017)2014–2017Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2019 | all samples (Guangzhou, 2014-2017)2014–2017Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2019 | all samples (Guangzhou, 2014-2017)2014–2017Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2019 | all samples (Guangzhou, 2014-2017)2014–2017Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 64.5 µg/kg (percentile); 110 µg/kg (percentile); 70 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2019 | all samples (Guangzhou, 2014-2017)2014–2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2019 | all samples (Guangzhou, 2014-2017)2014–2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2019 | all samples (Guangzhou, 2014-2017)2014–2017Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2019 | all samples (Guangzhou, 2014-2017)2014–2017Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2019 | all samples (Guangzhou, 2014-2017)2014–2017Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2023 | industrial region of northern Ningxia, food category pool2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldZhao et al. 2022 | national mean of 24 provincial composites2016–2019Basis not stated | mean. | ||
29 findings · 10 studies · 3 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018 | all 4 cansCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018 | beans retail can 1 of 4 (origin Jordan)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018 | beans retail can 2 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018 | beans retail can 3 of 4 (origin China)Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018 | beans retail can 4 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 5 µg/kg (minimum); 270 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, cannedSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020 | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cannedSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020 | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAl 2010 | Legume, Riyadh city markets, May 20092009Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAl 2010 | Legume, Riyadh city markets, May 20092009Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Jordan origin, 20.2% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Kuwait origin, 19.0% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Saudi Arabia origin, 19.1% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | UAE origin, 17.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cannedCantoral et al. 2024 | Legumes (retail, Mexico City)2022–2023Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 332 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | min. | ||
| Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | max. | ||
| Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | Halifax 19861986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | Montreal 19881986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | Ottawa 1985 (preliminary study)1986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | Toronto 19881986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | Vancouver 19871986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | Winnipeg 19871986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
13 findings · 4 studies · 8 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 300 µg/kg (maximum); 135 µg/kg (maximum); 353 µg/kg (maximum); 190 µg/kg (maximum); 103 µg/kg (percentile); 68.7 µg/kg (percentile); 67.7 µg/kg (percentile); 170 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | flowersCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | leavesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
6 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Legumes, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, cookedSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020 | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023 | Bathinda rural householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023 | Bathinda urban householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023 | Ludhiana rural householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023 | Ludhiana urban householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, oilOrisakwe et al. 2012 | all samples (Ohaji, Umuagwo, Owerri sites)Collection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
205 findings · 57 studies · 18 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | AFRO2018 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | AFRO2018 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EMRO2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EMRO2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EMRO2017–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EMRO2016–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2006–2007 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2001–2007 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2008–2009 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2006 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2009–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2006 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2006–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2001 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2018 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2016–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2018 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2006 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2006 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2006 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2001–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2010–2018 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2006 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2010 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2001 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2011–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2014 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2007 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000–2004 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2010 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2010 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2015 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO1999–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO1999–2018 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2010 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2005 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000–2002 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000–2008 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2002 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2014 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000–2002 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2004–2005 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2012 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAbdolahpour et al. 2023 | Babol County fields2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldANSES 2026 | all samples (organic and conventional)2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Central market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Central market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBanyen 2013 | Hua Takhe fresh market, Bangkok2011 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBanyen 2013 | Hua Takhe fresh market, Bangkok2011 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022 | amateur farmers; washed with tap water2021 | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025 | Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025 | Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025 | Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | pod vegetable, three local markets, Noakhali district2022 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | all samples (EU Member States and others, 2003-2007)2003–2007 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | all samples (EU Member States and others, 2003-2007)2003–2007 | mean.Same samples: 114 µg/kg (maximum); 0.5 µg/kg (percentile); 34 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | all samples (EU Member States and others, 2003-2007)2003–2007 | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | all samples (EU Member States and others, 2003-2007)2003–2007 | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | all samples (EU Member States and others, 2003-2007)2003–2007 | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019 | all samples2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019 | all samples2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019 | all samples2016 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019 | all samples2016 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019 | all samples2016 | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019 | all samples2016 | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHossen et al. 2026 | farm 22024 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldJMRS et al. 2010 | foods from CRF patients' homes and domestic environmentCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 2.1 µg/kg (minimum); 99.2 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, as soldJMRS et al. 2010 | foods from CRF patients' homes and domestic environmentCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldJMRS et al. 2010 | foods from CRF patients' homes and domestic environmentCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | mean.Same samples: 12.7 µg/kg (minimum); 17.8 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldPan et al. 2023 | Fresh legume vegetables, Zhejiang monitoring 2018-20222018–2022 | mean.Same samples: 97 µg/kg (maximum); 49 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Legumes, as soldPan et al. 2023 | Fresh legume vegetables, Zhejiang monitoring 2018-20222018–2022 | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldPan et al. 2023 | Fresh legume vegetables, Zhejiang monitoring 2018-20222018–2022 | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldPan et al. 2023 | Fresh legume vegetables, Zhejiang monitoring 2018-20222018–2022 | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSilva et al. 2025 | all three growing areas pooled2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | mean.Same samples: 40 µg/kg (minimum); 50 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, as soldWu 2024 | all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 10–430 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Legumes, as soldWu 2024 | all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreported | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2016–2019Dry weight | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026 | leafy vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAtaee et al. 2016 | local market 1, KermanshahCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAtaee et al. 2016 | local market 2, KermanshahCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAtaee et al. 2016 | local market 3, KermanshahCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBrima et al. 2025 | Legumes (N=14)2023–2024Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCardini et al. 2025 | Danish online-store purchaseCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Alagarno ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Alagarno ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | all wards (Kafiromi, Alagarno, Tumbi), market samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | all wards (Kafiromi, Alagarno, Tumbi), market samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Kafiromi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Kafiromi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Tumbi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Tumbi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldIslam et al. 2018 | industrial vicinity, Tangail2016Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 940–2,250 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Legumes, as soldIslam et al. 2018 | industrial vicinity, Tangail2016Dry weight | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldIyabo et al. 2015 | legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLiang et al. 2019 | Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMattila et al. 2018 | commercial product, Finland (n = 4)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldOladoye et al. 2016 | natural spice, Odo-Ori Market sample Spice-32015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldOrisakwe et al. 2012 | all samples (Ohaji, Umuagwo, Owerri sites)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldPirsaheb et al. 2015 | all brands, domestic and imported2014Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSalama et al. 2005 | legume, markets in five districts of AlexandriaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSalama et al. 2005 | legume, markets in five districts of AlexandriaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSharma et al. 2022 | four market sites, Bareilly city (pooled)2018Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSilva et al. 2026 | Badulla (vegetable-paddy rotation, Ultisol)2018–2020Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021 | Zone A farm harvest composite (ZAB)Collection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021 | Zone B farm harvest composite (ZBB)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021 | Zone C farm harvest composite (ZCB)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldZubairu et al. 2025 | improved variety, Challawa industrial areaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAbbas et al. 2010 | fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2012 | Pulses (beans), farm samples from main producing regions across2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCantoral et al. 2024 | all samples (single foodstuff, duplicate mean)2022–2023Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCantoral et al. 2024 | all samples (single foodstuff, duplicate mean)2022–2023Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCantoral et al. 2024 | detected foodstuffs in food group2022–2023Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 6–17 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Legumes, as soldCantoral et al. 2024 | detected foodstuffs in food group2022–2023Basis not stated | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChaura et al. 2026 | accession G3645 'Jamapa'Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChaura et al. 2026 | P. acutifolius species meanCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChaura et al. 2026 | P. vulgaris and P. lunatus species means, excluding G3645Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 1.38 µg/kg (minimum); 3.76 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority 2012 | all samples (EU Member State submissions)2003–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority 2012 | all samples (EU Member State submissions)2003–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldFerreira et al. 2021 | Bahia,BrazilCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldFerreira et al. 2021 | Bahia,BrazilCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHe et al. 2013 | Chinese National Food Survey, Shanghai, 20002002–2008Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHe et al. 2013 | Shanghai food monitoring (all samples)2002–2008Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHe et al. 2013 | Shanghai food monitoring (all samples)2002–2008Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 100 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Legumes, as soldHe et al. 2013 | Shanghai food monitoring (all samples)2002–2008Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldlyu 2022 | national2016–2019Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 4.5–41.9 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Legumes, as soldlyu 2022 | national2016–2019Basis not stated | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMahaffey et al. 1975 | US market baskets, all regions1968–1974Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022 | Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022 | Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022 | Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldOliveira 2020 | Bahia,BrazilCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldOliveira 2020 | Bahia,BrazilCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldRomán-Ochoa et al. 2021 | all samples of this type2019Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 1 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 2 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 3 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2023 | industrial region of northern Ningxia, food category pool2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldZhao et al. 2022 | national mean of 24 provincial composites2016–2019Basis not stated | mean. | ||
21 findings · 9 studies · 4 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018 | all 4 cansCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018 | beans retail can 1 of 4 (origin Jordan)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018 | beans retail can 2 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018 | beans retail can 3 of 4 (origin China)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018 | beans retail can 4 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | Cd mean in canned fava beans (Lebanese manufacture)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 75 µg/kg (minimum); 483 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, cannedSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, cannedSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Jordan origin, 20.2% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Kuwait origin, 19.0% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Saudi Arabia origin, 19.1% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | UAE origin, 17.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cannedCantoral et al. 2024 | all samples (single foodstuff, duplicate mean)2022–2023Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 0.61 µg/kg (minimum); 1.57 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | min. | ||
| Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | max. | ||
15 findings · 5 studies · 8 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 980 µg/kg (maximum); 290 µg/kg (maximum); 463 µg/kg (maximum); 648 µg/kg (maximum); 113 µg/kg (percentile); 44.8 µg/kg (percentile); 77 µg/kg (percentile); 177 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | flowersCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | leavesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, driedEuropean Food Safety Authority 2012 | all samples (EU Member State submissions)2003–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
6 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Legumes, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, cookedSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020 | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023 | Bathinda rural householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023 | Bathinda urban householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023 | Ludhiana rural householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023 | Ludhiana urban householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, oilOrisakwe et al. 2012 | all samples (Ohaji, Umuagwo, Owerri sites)Collection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
123 findings · 29 studies · 9 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | AFRO2018 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | AFRO2018 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2023 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2001–2023 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2008–2009 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2020–2021 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2009–2015 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2010–2015 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2008–2015 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2023 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2010–2023 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2002–2003 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2010–2023 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2011–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2001–2023 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2022–2023 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2014–2023 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2023 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2012 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2010–2015 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2012 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2022 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2014–2023 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2018–2022 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2016–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2015 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2022 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2007 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015–2022 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2001–2023 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2012–2014 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2023 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2008–2010 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2011–2022 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2023 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2009 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2002–2003 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2002–2013 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017–2023 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000–2002 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2009 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000–2008 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2002 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2013–2014 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2014 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2004–2014 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2013–2014 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2009 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000–2002 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2004–2005 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025 | Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025 | Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025 | Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019 | all samples2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019 | all samples2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019 | all samples2016 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019 | all samples2016 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019 | all samples2016 | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEMRKB et al. 2019 | all samples2016 | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHossen et al. 2026 | farm 22024 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 300 µg/kg (minimum); 7,400 µg/kg (maximum); 3,700 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | mean.Same samples: 15.7 µg/kg (minimum); 22.1 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | mean.Same samples: up to 43 µg/kg (range; lowest below the limit) | ||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWu 2024 | all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWu 2024 | all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreported | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBrima et al. 2025 | Legumes (N=14)2023–2024Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldIslam et al. 2018 | industrial vicinity, Tangail2016Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 1,260–2,110 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Legumes, as soldIslam et al. 2018 | industrial vicinity, Tangail2016Dry weight | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLiang et al. 2019 | Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSandil et al. 2023 | flowering stage, irrigated with 0.1 mg/L As (sodium arsenate)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSandil et al. 2023 | flowering stage, irrigated with 0.5 mg/L As (sodium arsenate)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSandil et al. 2023 | flowering stage, irrigated with 0.25 mg/L As (sodium arsenate)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSandil et al. 2023 | fruiting stage, irrigated with 0.1 mg/L As (sodium arsenate)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSandil et al. 2023 | fruiting stage, irrigated with 0.5 mg/L As (sodium arsenate)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSandil et al. 2023 | fruiting stage, irrigated with 0.25 mg/L As (sodium arsenate)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSharma et al. 2022 | four market sites, Bareilly city (pooled)2018Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSilva et al. 2026 | Badulla (vegetable-paddy rotation, Ultisol)2018–2020Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldZubairu et al. 2025 | improved variety, Challawa industrial areaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAbbas et al. 2010 | fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2012 | Pulses (beans), farm samples from main producing regions across2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChaura et al. 2026 | P. acutifolius species mean (4 accessions)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChaura et al. 2026 | P. vulgaris and P. lunatus species means, excluding G3645Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldClair-Caliot et al. 2021 | purchased, uncooked (initial As)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean.Same samples: 343 µg/kg (maximum); 50 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMahaffey et al. 1975 | US market baskets, all regions1968–1974Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022 | Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022 | Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022 | Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldRomán-Ochoa et al. 2021 | all samples of this type2019Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 1 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 2 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 3 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2023 | industrial region of northern Ningxia, food category pool2017Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
4 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cannedValizadeh et al. 2023 | all brands, Rasht (Gilan), 4 brands2023Basis not stated | mean. | ||
12 findings · 3 studies · 7 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 5,710 µg/kg (maximum); 290 µg/kg (maximum); 100 µg/kg (maximum); 140 µg/kg (maximum); 83 µg/kg (percentile); 90 µg/kg (percentile); 42 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
9 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Legumes, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, cookedClair-Caliot et al. 2021 | cooked with water at 0 µg/L As(V)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, cookedClair-Caliot et al. 2021 | cooked with water at 100 µg/L As(V)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, cookedClair-Caliot et al. 2021 | cooked with water at 500 µg/L As(V)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, cookedClair-Caliot et al. 2021 | cooked with water at 1000 µg/L As(V)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023 | Bathinda rural householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023 | Bathinda urban householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023 | Ludhiana rural householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023 | Ludhiana urban householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
30 findings · 5 studies · 4 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2023 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2011 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015–2020 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2020 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2016–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2021 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2022 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 2,200 µg/kg (maximum); 2,100 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | mean.Same samples: 2.8 µg/kg (minimum); 7.5 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2011Dry weight | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012 | all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012 | all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012 | all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 | European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 | European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 | European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 | European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 | European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 | European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
2 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, driedEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 | European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not stated | mean. | ||
7 findings · 2 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2016–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 2,200 µg/kg (maximum); 1,600 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | max. | ||
4 findings · 1 study · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 4,600 µg/kg (maximum); 800 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreported | max. | ||
66 findings · 16 studies · 7 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | AFRO2018 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | AFRO2018 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2008–2009 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2005 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2002 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2006–2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2001–2002 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2011 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2015 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2011 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2020 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015–2017 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2009 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2016 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2002 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2011 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2005 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2002 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000–2008 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2001–2002 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2014 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2005 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2002 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2004–2005 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldANSES 2026 | all samples (organic and conventional)2021–2022 | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025 | Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025 | Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChen et al. 2025 | Chongqing retail monitoring, mid-bound mean2017–2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldDabeka et al. 2003 | Ottawa composite (retail Oct-Nov 2000)1998–2000 | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldDabeka et al. 2003 | Whitehorse composite (retail Jan-Feb 1998)1998–2000 | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldKurniawati et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | mean.Same samples: 7.5 µg/kg (minimum); 17.5 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, as soldBrima et al. 2025 | Legumes (N=14)2023–2024Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLiang et al. 2019 | Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSharma et al. 2022 | four market sites, Bareilly city (pooled)2018Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021 | Zone A farm harvest composite (ZAB)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021 | Zone B farm harvest composite (ZBB)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021 | Zone C farm harvest composite (ZCB)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAbbas et al. 2010 | fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012 | EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012 | EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012 | EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 5 µg/kg (maximum); 9 µg/kg (maximum); 3 µg/kg (percentile); 4 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012 | EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012 | EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not stated | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012 | EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not stated | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012 | EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012 | EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012 | EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMahaffey et al. 1975 | US market baskets, all regions1968–1974Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022 | Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022 | Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMawari et al. 2022 | Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldRomán-Ochoa et al. 2021 | all samples of this type2019Basis not stated | mean. | ||
6 findings · 4 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | fava beans, highest legume HgCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 17 µg/kg (minimum); 121 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cannedValizadeh et al. 2023 | all brands, Rasht (Gilan), 4 brands2023Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
7 findings · 3 studies · 12 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 37 µg/kg (maximum); 5.9 µg/kg (maximum); 1.65 µg/kg (maximum); 14.3 µg/kg (maximum); 4.37 µg/kg (percentile); 1.56 µg/kg (percentile); 0.85 µg/kg (percentile); 5.13 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, driedEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012 | EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Legumes, driedEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012 | EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 45 µg/kg (maximum); 7 µg/kg (percentile); 9 µg/kg (percentile); 11 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Legumes, driedEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012 | EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not stated | max. | ||
| Legumes, driedEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012 | EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012 | EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012 | EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
5 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Legumes, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2019 | median. | ||
| Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023 | Bathinda rural householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023 | Bathinda urban householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023 | Ludhiana rural householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cookedKharkwal et al. 2023 | Ludhiana urban householdsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
32 findings · 16 studies · 12 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | pod vegetable, three local markets, Noakhali district2022 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (LB)2003–2012 | mean.Same samples: 710 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (LB)2003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (LB)2003–2012 | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (UB)2003–2012 | mean.Same samples: 710 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (UB)2003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (UB)2003–2012 | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | mean.Same samples: 420 µg/kg (minimum); 4,360 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, as soldWu 2024 | all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 500–20,100 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Legumes, as soldWu 2024 | all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreported | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldIslam et al. 2018 | industrial vicinity, Tangail2016Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 13,200–22,000 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Legumes, as soldIslam et al. 2018 | industrial vicinity, Tangail2016Dry weight | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldOrisakwe et al. 2012 | all samples (Ohaji, Umuagwo, Owerri sites)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldPirsaheb et al. 2015 | all brands, domestic and imported2014Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C9), measured by flame AASCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C9), measured by ICP-AESCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C18), measured by ICP-AESCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHan et al. 2024 | all samples in category Beans2018–2019Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHan et al. 2024 | all samples in category Beans2018–2019Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 1,220–9,210 µg/kg (range); 7,750 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Legumes, as soldHan et al. 2024 | all samples in category Beans2018–2019Basis not stated | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHan et al. 2024 | all samples in category Beans2018–2019Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHan et al. 2024 | Beans (Mung bean)2018–2019Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHan et al. 2024 | Beans (Mung bean)2018–2019Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 1,220–1,380 µg/kg (range); 1,370 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Legumes, as soldHan et al. 2024 | Beans (Mung bean)2018–2019Basis not stated | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHan et al. 2024 | Beans (Mung bean)2018–2019Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHan et al. 2024 | Vegetables and vegetable products (Legume (vegetable))2018–2019Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHan et al. 2024 | Vegetables and vegetable products (Legume (vegetable))2018–2019Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 161–3,350 µg/kg (range); 2,610 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Legumes, as soldHan et al. 2024 | Vegetables and vegetable products (Legume (vegetable))2018–2019Basis not stated | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHan et al. 2024 | Vegetables and vegetable products (Legume (vegetable))2018–2019Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2023 | industrial region of northern Ningxia, food category pool2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
6 findings · 4 studies | ||||
| Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
5 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Legumes, driedEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (LB)2003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (UB)2003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | flowersCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | leavesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2019 | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, oilOrisakwe et al. 2012 | all samples (Ohaji, Umuagwo, Owerri sites)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
46 findings · 20 studies · 4 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Central market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Central market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | pod vegetable, three local markets, Noakhali district2022 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, LB2000–2013 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, LB2000–2013 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, LB2000–2013 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, LB2000–2013 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, LB2000–2013 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, UB2000–2013 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, UB2000–2013 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, UB2000–2013 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, UB2000–2013 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, UB2000–2013 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009 | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHossen et al. 2026 | farm 22024 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldKurniawati et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | mean.Same samples: 253 µg/kg (minimum); 672 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWu 2024 | all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 7–2,600 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Legumes, as soldWu 2024 | all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreported | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCherfi et al. 2014 | Boumerdes wholesale markets2012Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Alagarno ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Alagarno ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | all wards (Kafiromi, Alagarno, Tumbi), market samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | all wards (Kafiromi, Alagarno, Tumbi), market samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Kafiromi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Kafiromi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Tumbi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Tumbi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldIslam et al. 2018 | industrial vicinity, Tangail2016Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 12,500–21,100 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Legumes, as soldIslam et al. 2018 | industrial vicinity, Tangail2016Dry weight | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldLiang et al. 2019 | Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldPirsaheb et al. 2015 | all brands, domestic and imported2014Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021 | Zone A farm harvest composite (ZAB)Collection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021 | Zone B farm harvest composite (ZBB)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldUsman et al. 2021 | Zone C farm harvest composite (ZCB)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2023 | industrial region of northern Ningxia, food category pool2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
6 findings · 4 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (minimum); 60 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
11 findings · 3 studies · 8 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 4,600 µg/kg (maximum); 1,050 µg/kg (maximum); 379 µg/kg (maximum); 965 µg/kg (maximum); 1,060 µg/kg (percentile); 670 µg/kg (percentile); 241 µg/kg (percentile); 436 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedYu et al. 2023 | all samples of this bean type, 11 Zhejiang monitoring areasCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | flowersCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | leavesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2019 | median. | ||
17 findings · 7 studies | ||||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2008–2009 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2009 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldANSES 2026 | all samples (organic and conventional)2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSharma et al. 2022 | four market sites, Bareilly city (pooled)2018Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2023 | industrial region of northern Ningxia, food category pool2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
5 findings · 3 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | fava beans, highest Al among vegetables and legumesCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 70 µg/kg (minimum); 2,700 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
6 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | flowersCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | leavesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
19 findings · 4 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2008–2009 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2009 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000–2002 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2001–2002 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000–2002 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011 | median. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | mean.Same samples: 11.9 µg/kg (minimum); 162 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldRomán-Ochoa et al. 2021 | all samples of this type2019Basis not stated | mean. | ||
2 findings · 2 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 2,500 µg/kg (minimum); 40,000 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Legumes, cannedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020 | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2019 | median. | ||
9 findings · 6 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldKurniawati et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | mean.Same samples: 29–68 µg/kg (range); up to 41 µg/kg (range; lowest below the limit) | ||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
7 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Jordan origin, 20.2% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Kuwait origin, 19.0% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Saudi Arabia origin, 19.1% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | UAE origin, 17.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
49 findings · 24 studies · 6 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, as soldAbdolahpour et al. 2023 | Babol County fields2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAbdolahpour et al. 2023 | Babol County fields2021 | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Central market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Central market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBanyen 2013 | Hua Takhe fresh market, Bangkok2011 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBanyen 2013 | Hua Takhe fresh market, Bangkok2011 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHossen et al. 2026 | farm 22024 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | mean.Same samples: 7,590 µg/kg (minimum); 9,620 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Cereals2010–2011 | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | mean.Same samples: 7,000 µg/kg (minimum); 11,100 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, as soldWu 2024 | all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 6,860–12,400 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Legumes, as soldWu 2024 | all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWu 2024 | all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreported | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026 | leafy vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCherfi et al. 2014 | Boumerdes wholesale markets2012Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Alagarno ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Alagarno ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | all wards (Kafiromi, Alagarno, Tumbi), market samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | all wards (Kafiromi, Alagarno, Tumbi), market samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Kafiromi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Kafiromi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Tumbi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Tumbi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldIslam et al. 2018 | industrial vicinity, Tangail2016Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 8,730–14,600 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Legumes, as soldIslam et al. 2018 | industrial vicinity, Tangail2016Dry weight | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldIyabo et al. 2015 | legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldIyabo et al. 2015 | legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMattila et al. 2018 | commercial product, Finland (n = 4)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldOladoye et al. 2016 | natural spice, Odo-Ori Market sample Spice-32015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldPirsaheb et al. 2015 | all brands, domestic and imported2014Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSalama et al. 2005 | legume, markets in five districts of AlexandriaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSalama et al. 2005 | legume, markets in five districts of AlexandriaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSilva et al. 2026 | Badulla (vegetable-paddy rotation, Ultisol)2018–2020Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldZubairu et al. 2025 | improved variety, Challawa industrial areaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C9), measured by flame AASCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C9), measured by ICP-AESCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sampleCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C18), measured by ICP-AESCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 1 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 2 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 3 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2023 | industrial region of northern Ningxia, food category pool2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
13 findings · 4 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018 | all 4 cansCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018 | beans retail can 1 of 4 (origin Jordan)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018 | beans retail can 2 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018 | beans retail can 3 of 4 (origin China)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018 | beans retail can 4 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | fava beans, Lebanese manufactureCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 30 µg/kg (minimum); 4,000 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Jordan origin, 20.2% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Kuwait origin, 19.0% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Saudi Arabia origin, 19.1% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | UAE origin, 17.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | flowersCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | leavesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
12 findings · 8 studies | ||||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Central market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Central market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | pod vegetable, three local markets, Noakhali district2022 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHossen et al. 2026 | farm 22024 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026 | leafy vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMattila et al. 2018 | commercial product, Finland (n = 4)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldOladoye et al. 2016 | natural spice, Odo-Ori Market sample Spice-32015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
8 findings · 4 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 4,000 µg/kg (minimum); 10,000 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Jordan origin, 20.2% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Kuwait origin, 19.0% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Saudi Arabia origin, 19.1% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | UAE origin, 17.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedValizadeh et al. 2023 | all brands, Rasht (Gilan), 4 brands2023Basis not stated | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | flowersCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | leavesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
6 findings · 4 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | mean.Same samples: 3,100 µg/kg (minimum); 5,400 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMattila et al. 2018 | commercial product, Finland (n = 4)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | max. | ||
6 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Jordan origin, 20.2% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Kuwait origin, 19.0% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Saudi Arabia origin, 19.1% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | UAE origin, 17.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | flowersCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | leavesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
40 findings · 21 studies · 3 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, as soldAbdolahpour et al. 2023 | Babol County fields2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Central market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Central market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldauthors 2024 | Muda Lawal market, BauchiCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBanyen 2013 | Hua Takhe fresh market, Bangkok2011 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBanyen 2013 | Hua Takhe fresh market, Bangkok2011 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022 | amateur farmers; washed with tap water2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldKurniawati et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | mean.Same samples: 58,500 µg/kg (minimum); 91,000 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, as soldWu 2024 | all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 20,100–33,100 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Legumes, as soldWu 2024 | all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreported | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026 | leafy vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCherfi et al. 2014 | Boumerdes wholesale markets2012Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Alagarno ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Alagarno ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | all wards (Kafiromi, Alagarno, Tumbi), market samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | all wards (Kafiromi, Alagarno, Tumbi), market samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Kafiromi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Kafiromi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Tumbi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldHajara et al. 2026 | Tumbi ward markets, Gamawa LGACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldIyabo et al. 2015 | legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldIyabo et al. 2015 | legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMattila et al. 2018 | commercial product, Finland (n = 4)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldPirsaheb et al. 2015 | all brands, domestic and imported2014Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSalama et al. 2005 | legume, markets in five districts of AlexandriaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSalama et al. 2005 | legume, markets in five districts of AlexandriaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldSilva et al. 2026 | Badulla (vegetable-paddy rotation, Ultisol)2018–2020Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | min. | ||
| Legumes, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013Dry weight | max. | ||
| Legumes, as soldZubairu et al. 2025 | improved variety, Challawa industrial areaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMahaffey et al. 1975 | US market baskets, all regions1968–1974Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 1 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 2 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 3 (fresh legumes)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWang et al. 2023 | industrial region of northern Ningxia, food category pool2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
12 findings · 4 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018 | all 4 cansCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018 | beans retail can 1 of 4 (origin Jordan)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018 | beans retail can 2 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018 | beans retail can 3 of 4 (origin China)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAl et al. 2018 | beans retail can 4 of 4 (origin UAE)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 4,000 µg/kg (minimum); 13,000 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Legumes, cannedKorfali et al. 2013 | legumes (food type), Lebanese supermarketsCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Jordan origin, 20.2% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Kuwait origin, 19.0% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Saudi Arabia origin, 19.1% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | UAE origin, 17.5% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | flowersCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | leavesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
5 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
4 findings · 2 studies · 1 spread figure folded in | ||||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | mean.Same samples: 91–196 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldMahaffey et al. 1975 | US market baskets, all regions1968–1974Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, as soldANSES 2026 | all samples (organic and conventional)2021–2022 | not detected. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022 | amateur farmers; washed with tap water2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021 | not detected. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
3 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | flowersCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | leavesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, as soldWu 2024 | all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWu 2024 | all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldWu 2024 | all samples, Jiaozuo marketsCollection date unreported | range. | ||
3 findings · 1 study · 1 spread figure folded in | ||||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | mean.Same samples: up to 3.3 µg/kg (range; lowest below the limit) | ||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | not detected. | ||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | range. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, driedSund et al. 2026 | PEF 12023Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedSund et al. 2026 | PEF 22023Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedSund et al. 2026 | PEF 32023Dry weight | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | flowersCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | leavesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | flowersCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | leavesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
3 findings · 2 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | mean.Same samples: 394–942 µg/kg (range); 208–720 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 6, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, cannedTokay 2022 | retail sample 13, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 3, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, frozenTokay 2022 | retail sample 7, local supermarkets, BalikesirCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | flowersCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Legumes, driedIbrahim 2020 | leavesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
4 findings · 2 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | mean.Same samples: 1,250–2,290 µg/kg (range); 2,990–7,930 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | mean. | ||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldVentura et al. 2025 | all samples2014–2016 | range. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | sample value. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Legumes, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group IV2021–2022Dry weight | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, cannedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 14_882014–2015Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Legumes, driedBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 13_782014–2015Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
Shared dataset methods and interpretation
Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.
HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, as sold. Legumes, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤12.3 | 400–520 (bounded) | 835–1150 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤15 | 400–520 (bounded) | 835–1150 (bounded) |
417 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 415 | 50% |
| Stančić et al. 2016 | 2 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-7105975c1543:fabae01eb355
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.83 | ≤5.1 | 82 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.83 | 10 | 82 |
26 reference units; 5 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 17 | 20% |
| Altıkulaç et al. 2025 | 2 | 20% |
| Ataee et al. 2016 | 1 | 20% |
| Iyabo et al. 2015 | 2 | 20% |
| Shivakumar et al. 2020 | 4 | 20% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
5 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-41004e905518:1b099f84e462
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, canned
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤4 | ≤4 | ≤110 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤4 | ≤4 | ≤110 |
10 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 6 | 33% |
| Spungen et al. 2024 | 2 | 33% |
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-d0524257b3d9:1f55f69a824c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight. Legumes, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 2700 | 4450 | 5650 |
| Alternative weighting | 2700 | 4450 | 5650 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Alsabagh 2025 | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-5a9a009121e1:493bc7a561e0
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, dried
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, dried. Legumes, dried; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 4.5 | 8.61 | 13.9 |
| Alternative weighting | 4.5 | 8.61 | 13.9 |
3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Yu et al. 2023 | 3 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, dried on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Yu et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, dried on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-26f571800825:deb480e47d8c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤110 | ≤110 | ≤110 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤110 | ≤110 | ≤110 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-b9a0c1ec5ff8:f6203e52a77e
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Pb reference · Legumes, cooked. Legumes, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤4 | ≤4 | ≤4 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤4 | ≤4 | ≤4 |
3 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 2 | 50% |
| Spungen et al. 2024 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-64b7b096052d:54a6bd6ad6f2
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, as sold. Legumes, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 3 | 3–3.32 (bounded) | 3.5–10 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | 3 | 3 | 4–8 (bounded) |
360 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 357 | 33% |
| EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | 1 | 33% |
| EMRKB et al. 2019 | 2 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-298aaebf5fcb:8a8ff9fe205e
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤10 | 15–17.5 (bounded) | 340 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤10 | 15–17.5 (bounded) | 340 |
14 reference units; 6 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 4 | 17% |
| Altıkulaç et al. 2025 | 2 | 17% |
| Ataee et al. 2016 | 3 | 17% |
| Iyabo et al. 2015 | 1 | 17% |
| Oladoye et al. 2016 | 1 | 17% |
| Shivakumar et al. 2020 | 3 | 17% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
6 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
- WHO GEMS/Food
- Altıkulaç et al. 2025
- Ataee et al. 2016
- Iyabo et al. 2015
- Oladoye et al. 2016
- Shivakumar et al. 2020
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-4908922cca25:fd24833df971
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, canned
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1.9 | 0.55–33.2 (bounded) | 1.9–52.4 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1.9 | 0.55–33.2 (bounded) | 1.9–52.4 (bounded) |
8 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 6 | 50% |
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-39b0ff3d8ad6:81088cfb79ec
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight. Legumes, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 150 | 250 | 400 |
| Alternative weighting | 150 | 250 | 400 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Alsabagh 2025 | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-a38c626066c3:d549be156363
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, dried
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, dried. Legumes, dried; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 4.31 | 4.77 | 19.3 |
| Alternative weighting | 4.31 | 4.77 | 19.3 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Yu et al. 2023 | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, dried on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Yu et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, dried on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-59617557ab92:8c7486b23722
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤52.4 | ≤52.4 | ≤52.4 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤52.4 | ≤52.4 | ≤52.4 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-58b8671811b3:69d24d3531f6
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Cd reference · Legumes, cooked. Legumes, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
3 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 2 | 50% |
| Spungen et al. 2024 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-807bfee5c634:8de92ed7dac4
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes tAs reference · Legumes, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI legumes tAs reference · Legumes, as sold. Legumes, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤18.2 | ≤18.8 | ≤24 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤18.2 | ≤18.2 | ≤24 |
179 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 176 | 33% |
| EMRKB et al. 2019 | 2 | 33% |
| Ventura et al. 2025 | 1 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-f4a5b54d245a:07446d478ce7
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes tAs reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes tAs reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤2.79 | 26–27.4 (bounded) | 52 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤2.79 | 26–27.4 (bounded) | 52 |
3 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Altıkulaç et al. 2025 | 2 | 50% |
| Shivakumar et al. 2020 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-4937fc569ca5:0c7b93d55d66
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes tAs reference · Legumes, canned
Reference and scope
HMI legumes tAs reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤3 | ≤3 | ≤3 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤3 | ≤3 | ≤3 |
6 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 6 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-4ec6fdc9dd36:61eb78c7c07d
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes tAs reference · Legumes, dried
Reference and scope
HMI legumes tAs reference · Legumes, dried. Legumes, dried; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 3 | 6.13 | 9.87 |
| Alternative weighting | 3 | 6.13 | 9.87 |
3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Yu et al. 2023 | 3 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, dried on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Yu et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, dried on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-5c49cb445c48:a3f6b7ba5cd3
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes tAs reference · Legumes, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI legumes tAs reference · Legumes, cooked. Legumes, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤3 | ≤3 | ≤3 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤3 | ≤3 | ≤3 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, cooked on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-78d96be9ecc7:4d9b68e37112
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes iAs reference · Legumes, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI legumes iAs reference · Legumes, as sold. Legumes, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤5 | ≤15 | 4.5–30 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤5 | ≤15 | 53.7 |
20 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 20 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-9d0f4e37ba0e:44a8681c4e3c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes iAs reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes iAs reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 54.6 | 54.6 | 54.6 |
| Alternative weighting | 54.6 | 54.6 | 54.6 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-c4b87f59318d:a4c5b149e34e
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes DMA reference · Legumes, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI legumes DMA reference · Legumes, as sold. Legumes, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-170991b7bcc5:4025e715e5df
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes tHg reference · Legumes, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI legumes tHg reference · Legumes, as sold. Legumes, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.12 | ≤0.22 | 0.22–2 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.12 | ≤0.22 | 0.22–2 (bounded) |
105 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 103 | 50% |
| Dabeka et al. 2003 | 2 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-a93bbdaa023b:e5c8d3c93831
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes tHg reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes tHg reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 21 | 22.5 | 24 |
| Alternative weighting | 21 | 22.5 | 24 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Shivakumar et al. 2020 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Shivakumar et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-39944a1ac77c:47db6f3694a6
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes tHg reference · Legumes, canned
Reference and scope
HMI legumes tHg reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
6 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 6 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-c6834d0af013:6883aca611df
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes tHg reference · Legumes, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI legumes tHg reference · Legumes, cooked. Legumes, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, cooked on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-1298495e43ac:84191f5830cb
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Ni reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Ni reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.66 | ≤0.66 | ≤0.66 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.66 | ≤0.66 | ≤0.66 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Altıkulaç et al. 2025 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Altıkulaç et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-8366d16ea2d9:beeab70f6633
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Ni reference · Legumes, canned
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Ni reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 100–159 (bounded) | 210 | 310 |
| Alternative weighting | 100–159 (bounded) | 210 | 310 |
8 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 6 | 50% |
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-b041adb218e2:1ed679768e77
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Ni reference · Legumes, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Ni reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 204 | 372 | 540 |
| Alternative weighting | 204 | 372 | 540 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-06bd8c71f929:7bb44ab49791
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Ni reference · Legumes, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Ni reference · Legumes, cooked. Legumes, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 910 | 920 | 930 |
| Alternative weighting | 910 | 920 | 930 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, cooked on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-d592f5511767:97d8910eeaf0
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Cr reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Cr reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 489 | 932 | 2230 |
| Alternative weighting | 489 | 932 | 2230 |
6 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Altıkulaç et al. 2025 | 2 | 50% |
| Shivakumar et al. 2020 | 4 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-9c9b6ed4bfdc:6dbbdadad4ee
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Cr reference · Legumes, canned
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Cr reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤50 | ≤65 | ≤80 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤50 | ≤65 | ≤80 |
8 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 6 | 50% |
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-15dca0f27ff3:79a9bf9b6b10
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Cr reference · Legumes, dried
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Cr reference · Legumes, dried. Legumes, dried; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 86 | 113 | 143 |
| Alternative weighting | 86 | 113 | 143 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Yu et al. 2023 | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, dried on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Yu et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, dried on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-76feb2abc19e:2b78ce5fb719
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Cr reference · Legumes, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Cr reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤80 | ≤80 | ≤80 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤80 | ≤80 | ≤80 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-6d8545df7c09:b2ea6f785922
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Cr reference · Legumes, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Cr reference · Legumes, cooked. Legumes, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, cooked on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-c244be4ac097:d70879f04e10
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Al reference · Legumes, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Al reference · Legumes, as sold. Legumes, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1600 | 1640 | 2130 |
| Alternative weighting | 1600 | 1890 | 3210 |
5 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 5 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-a608e569fb02:ca65e0136a4c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Al reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Al reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 696 | 1000 | 1310 |
| Alternative weighting | 696 | 1000 | 1310 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Altıkulaç et al. 2025 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Altıkulaç et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-d3f61ca32433:05cd638e5ec1
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Al reference · Legumes, canned
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Al reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 320 | 750 | 1180 |
| Alternative weighting | 320 | 750 | 1180 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-748495841df4:cf1798916c61
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Al reference · Legumes, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Al reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 720 | 1030 | 1340 |
| Alternative weighting | 720 | 1030 | 1340 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-e9b5e9a93a58:e8e83ade5b63
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Sn reference · Legumes, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Sn reference · Legumes, as sold. Legumes, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤13.1 | 20–27 (bounded) | 38.5–44.6 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤13.1 | 20–23.5 (bounded) | 34.6–38.5 (bounded) |
13 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 13 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-d3b90ce0cdb5:ffc1f0be7cf6
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes U reference · Legumes, canned
Reference and scope
HMI legumes U reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
6 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 6 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-c1f104e4066e:67b69871324f
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes U reference · Legumes, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI legumes U reference · Legumes, cooked. Legumes, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | 1–1.5 (bounded) | 2 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | 1–1.5 (bounded) | 2 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, cooked on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-d82cb27472cf:175644598496
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Co reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Co reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.34 | ≤0.34 | ≤0.34 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.34 | ≤0.34 | ≤0.34 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Altıkulaç et al. 2025 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Altıkulaç et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-ce5b739133d1:8a606e519412
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Co reference · Legumes, canned
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Co reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤135 | ≤135 | ≤135 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤135 | ≤135 | ≤135 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-dfb0a33b67df:0db1d858a8f2
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Co reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Co reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight. Legumes, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 700 | 850 | 950 |
| Alternative weighting | 700 | 850 | 950 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Alsabagh 2025 | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-ad8d7bf3c9c1:49b296f0017a
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Co reference · Legumes, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Co reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤135 | ≤135 | ≤135 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤135 | ≤135 | ≤135 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-29635b989aa0:d3acfaa13e11
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Cu reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Cu reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 29.5–29.8 (bounded) | 1530 | 6800 |
| Alternative weighting | 29.5–29.8 (bounded) | 1530 | 6800 |
9 reference units; 4 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Altıkulaç et al. 2025 | 2 | 25% |
| Iyabo et al. 2015 | 2 | 25% |
| Oladoye et al. 2016 | 1 | 25% |
| Shivakumar et al. 2020 | 4 | 25% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
4 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-f38963895ab2:09e6e2e8ecf3
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Cu reference · Legumes, canned
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Cu reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 780 | 2470 | 4160 |
| Alternative weighting | 780 | 2470 | 4160 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-dafa473b1dac:e4c12ce13950
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Cu reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Cu reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight. Legumes, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 6300 | 9600 | 11800 |
| Alternative weighting | 6300 | 9600 | 11800 |
3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Alsabagh 2025 | 3 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-26e5c6249a8c:96672537ec5a
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Cu reference · Legumes, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Cu reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 980 | 3710 | 6440 |
| Alternative weighting | 980 | 3710 | 6440 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-cf5253c9ead8:f2c1725c1c6c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Fe reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Fe reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 29300 | 52300 | 59300 |
| Alternative weighting | 29300 | 52300 | 59300 |
3 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Altıkulaç et al. 2025 | 2 | 50% |
| Oladoye et al. 2016 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-093374632670:c19cc4e7e5b0
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Fe reference · Legumes, canned
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Fe reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 15300 | 17100 | 18800 |
| Alternative weighting | 15300 | 17100 | 18800 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-480d83cb0920:846a9427c0f8
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Fe reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Fe reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight. Legumes, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 31800 | 37500 | 42600 |
| Alternative weighting | 31800 | 37500 | 42600 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Alsabagh 2025 | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-b825cc73d3f4:0ce22a35961d
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Fe reference · Legumes, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Fe reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 10400 | 21300 | 32200 |
| Alternative weighting | 10400 | 21300 | 32200 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-bf7cdb80e45d:61fa77b00767
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Mn reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Mn reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1790 | 1950 | 2120 |
| Alternative weighting | 1790 | 1950 | 2120 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Altıkulaç et al. 2025 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Altıkulaç et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-6c255283bc21:9cb0173bb5d3
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Mn reference · Legumes, canned
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Mn reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 990 | 1710 | 2430 |
| Alternative weighting | 990 | 1710 | 2430 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-8ce505cd7b07:b6d633dbc1bb
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Mn reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Mn reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight. Legumes, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 4900 | 6400 | 7850 |
| Alternative weighting | 4900 | 6400 | 7850 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Alsabagh 2025 | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-868149d33137:a340d9e25f51
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Mn reference · Legumes, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Mn reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1790 | 3390 | 4990 |
| Alternative weighting | 1790 | 3390 | 4990 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-a20440549f73:5afb58e8e630
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Zn reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Zn reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 741 | 2210 | 13200 |
| Alternative weighting | 741 | 2210 | 13200 |
4 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Altıkulaç et al. 2025 | 2 | 50% |
| Iyabo et al. 2015 | 2 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-660964ec8c81:5a4ae93a348c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Zn reference · Legumes, canned
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Zn reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1650 | 4330 | 7000 |
| Alternative weighting | 1650 | 4330 | 7000 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-503e9e147d91:5f98028be5e0
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Zn reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Zn reference · Legumes, canned, dry weight. Legumes, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 34100 | 38600 | 39000 |
| Alternative weighting | 34100 | 38600 | 39000 |
3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Alsabagh 2025 | 3 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-4a114c4e065f:f762ba68528e
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Zn reference · Legumes, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Zn reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 2290 | 8470 | 14600 |
| Alternative weighting | 2290 | 8470 | 14600 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-cc492289eacf:7d024e4752bd
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes V reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes V reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤6.08 | ≤6.08 | ≤6.08 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤6.08 | ≤6.08 | ≤6.08 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Altıkulaç et al. 2025 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Altıkulaç et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-b9df89c1b704:2ef203ae121d
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes V reference · Legumes, canned
Reference and scope
HMI legumes V reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤64.1 | ≤64.1 | ≤64.1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤64.1 | ≤64.1 | ≤64.1 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-692a244361cb:721a951b3b2c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes V reference · Legumes, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI legumes V reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤64.1 | ≤64.1 | ≤64.1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤64.1 | ≤64.1 | ≤64.1 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-22a784db13c3:318c0bd045db
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Se reference · Legumes, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Se reference · Legumes, as sold. Legumes, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤48 | ≤48 | ≤48 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤48 | ≤48 | ≤48 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Ventura et al. 2025 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Ventura et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-0940c0870cc7:7717777b66f2
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes B reference · Legumes, canned
Reference and scope
HMI legumes B reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤219 | ≤219 | ≤219 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤219 | ≤219 | ≤219 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-0dddfe43b9c7:f85ba9ea53c9
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes B reference · Legumes, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI legumes B reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1200 | 3990 | 6780 |
| Alternative weighting | 1200 | 3990 | 6780 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-6f3da8978cb5:02458f1790dd
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Ba reference · Legumes, canned
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Ba reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 340 | 360 | 380 |
| Alternative weighting | 340 | 360 | 380 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-8ddbe5d7a4f1:68569d631141
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Ba reference · Legumes, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Ba reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 410 | 445 | 480 |
| Alternative weighting | 410 | 445 | 480 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-24db24a4462a:938afcb9653a
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Ca reference · Legumes, canned
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Ca reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 350000 | 413000 | 475000 |
| Alternative weighting | 350000 | 413000 | 475000 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-9e8dd739a292:d1f470644595
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Ca reference · Legumes, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Ca reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 435000 | 488000 | 541000 |
| Alternative weighting | 435000 | 488000 | 541000 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-dbe19a410f11:fa20933f0ffb
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes I reference · Legumes, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI legumes I reference · Legumes, as sold. Legumes, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤8.6 | ≤8.6 | ≤8.6 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤8.6 | ≤8.6 | ≤8.6 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Ventura et al. 2025 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Ventura et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-6644197d1224:87f5de83017d
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Mg reference · Legumes, canned
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Mg reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 154000 | 191000 | 228000 |
| Alternative weighting | 154000 | 191000 | 228000 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-3fbfff81f0f2:6ebb46c441e8
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Mg reference · Legumes, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Mg reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 209000 | 500000 | 791000 |
| Alternative weighting | 209000 | 500000 | 791000 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-93b419a69183:b58012fd2989
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Mo reference · Legumes, canned
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Mo reference · Legumes, canned. Legumes, canned; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 384 | 1540 | 2700 |
| Alternative weighting | 384 | 1540 | 2700 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, canned on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, canned on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-0b4f1dc8f115:e9777aeaeabd
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Mo reference · Legumes, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Mo reference · Legumes, frozen. Legumes, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤109 | 2120–2170 (bounded) | 4240 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤109 | 2120–2170 (bounded) | 4240 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Tokay 2022 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Tokay 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, frozen on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-bb864cde9ee3:43fb45da5787
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Sr reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Sr reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 4460 | 11100 | 17700 |
| Alternative weighting | 4460 | 11100 | 17700 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Altıkulaç et al. 2025 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Altıkulaç et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-d15d82292aca:e67d339537ed
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI legumes Ti reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI legumes Ti reference · Legumes, as sold, dry weight. Legumes, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 773 | 1040 | 1300 |
| Alternative weighting | 773 | 1040 | 1300 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Altıkulaç et al. 2025 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for legumes, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Altıkulaç et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for legumes, as sold on this basis in the completed legumes ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:legumes-2fb4d97d6bd3:2f210eb7a24d
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
The source reports only a percentile, range or maximum for these samples, with no mean or median to place against the reference. Spread figures that do have a mean or median are shown on that row instead.
The value could not be reconciled with its own paper, so it is shown but not compared.
The result is below a reporting limit, and the range from zero to that limit crosses more than one band.
No medians or sample values exist for this form and metal, so no HMI reference could be built.
The HMI reference for this form has fewer than four units or no measurable spread, below the display minimum.
The result is on a basis (dry weight, or not stated) that no HMI reference for this form uses, so it cannot be placed.
Reporting limits overlap the study comparison, so no direction can be shown.
No findings match these filters. Change the selection or reset to show all source findings.
How metals reach legumes
No study in the library compared legumes from contaminated and ordinary settings, so the routes by which metals reach it are not measured here.
Which forms and regions measured lower
For cadmium, the HMI reference median was lowest for legumes, dried (4.77 µg/kg) and highest for legumes, canned (250 µg/kg); forms differ in water content, so this compares foods as sold or eaten, not uptake.7Toxic Elements in Beans from Zhejiang, Southeast China: Distribution and Probabilistic Health Risk AssessmentFoodsRead source →11Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlnakhla Journal of ScienceRead source → The HMI reference for lead in legumes, as sold pools 26 subgroup units from 5 sampling families, with a median of below 5.1 µg/kg and a middle half spanning below 0.83 (lower quartile) and 82 µg/kg (upper quartile).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →24Evaluation of Health Risks Associated with Potential Toxic Elements in Selected Vegetables Consumed in the Western Black Sea Region of TurkeyACS Omega 2025, 10, 8843-8858Read source →25Application of microwave-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry for ultra-trace determination of lead and cadmium in cereals and agricultural productsInternational Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry 96(3):271-283Read source →26Toxic and Essential Metals in Staple Foods Commonly Consumed by Students in Ekiti State, South West, NigeriaInternational Journal of ChemistryRead source →27Heavy Metal Contaminations and Health Risk Assessment from Fruits and Vegetables in Bangalore Rural Markets, Karnataka, IndiaRasayan Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2498-2507Read source → For lead in legumes, canned, the reference median was below 4 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 4 to below 110 µg/kg across 10 units.2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →28Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →29Determination of Some Elements in Canned and Frozen Vegetables Sold in Balıkesir (Türkiye) Markets and Nutritional AssessmentAdıyaman University Journal of Science (ADYU J SCI) 12(2), 230-243Read source → For lead in legumes, as sold, the reference median was between 400 and 520 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 12.3 to between 835 and 1,150 µg/kg across 417 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →30Detection of heavy metals in common vegetables at Varaždin City Market, CroatiaArhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju (Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology) 2016;67:340-350Read source →
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, legumes, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (1.1 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (90 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in AFRO (1 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (43 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For total arsenic, the lowest regional median was in WPRO (1 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (16.1 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Targeted legumes, as sold samples in EURO had aluminium lower at 1,410 µg/kg, against 1,870 µg/kg for EURO in the same study.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
In one study, lead across 18 groups of legumes ranged from 1.1 µg/kg (PAHO) to 90 µg/kg (WPRO); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In another study, lead across 5 groups of legumes ranged from 120 µg/kg (Ottawa 1985 (preliminary study)) to 332 µg/kg (Montreal 1988); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.31Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Journal of AOAC InternationalRead source →
Processing, cooking and preparation
Processed or prepared forms were compared only with unprocessed legumes in the same study and group. Legumes, canned (Legume, Riyadh city markets, May 2009) had lead higher at 19 µg/kg, against 14 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (legumes, as sold).32Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakeMolecules 2010, 15, 7482-7497Read source → In another study, legumes, canned (5 city composites) had lead higher at 152 µg/kg, against 21.7 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (legumes, as sold).31Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Journal of AOAC InternationalRead source → A third study found that legumes, dried (all samples (both areas)) had lead lower at 54 µg/kg, against 55.7 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (legumes, as sold).33Contamination and health risk assessment of lead, arsenic, cadmium, and aluminum from a total diet study of Jilin Province, ChinaFood Science & NutritionRead source →
Forms differ in water content, so a per-kilogram difference is not by itself a measured removal or gain of metal.
Mitigation for legumes
Lot testing against the applicable limit is the check that can be verified.
No measured way to lower metals in this food is in the library yet.
Trade-offs and limits of controls
Metals do not move together, so a lot that passes a lead limit says little about cadmium, arsenic or nickel unless those are tested as well.
Testing legumes for metals
Results depend on the method and its reporting limit. Reporting limits for lead ranged from 0.045 µg/kg (Kharkwal et al. 2023) to 3,000 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →19Non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risk assessment of heavy metals in cooked beans and vegetables in Punjab, North IndiaFood Science & NutritionRead source → Reporting limits for cadmium ranged from 0.006 µg/kg (Kharkwal et al. 2023) to 1,000 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →19Non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risk assessment of heavy metals in cooked beans and vegetables in Punjab, North IndiaFood Science & NutritionRead source → Reporting limits for total arsenic ranged from 0.009 µg/kg (Kharkwal et al. 2023) to 2,500 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →19Non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risk assessment of heavy metals in cooked beans and vegetables in Punjab, North IndiaFood Science & NutritionRead source →
A useful lot result names the form, the basis and a quantification limit well below the limit that applies.
Buying and verifying legumes
No maximum level for metals in legumes was verified from primary text for this page; buyers should confirm the limit that applies in the destination market.
Exposure from legumes
No source in the library converted legumes concentrations into a verified estimate of intake for a defined population. Concentrations describe the food, not individual risk.
Evidence review and remaining gaps
Every source record that names legumes was decided on its content: 90 occurrence extracted, 90 records in all. The occurrence table renders every extracted result; held values remain visible with their reason.
References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.
Legumes FAQs
What heavy metals are found in legumes?
The library reports lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, monomethylarsonic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ag, As, B, Ba, Ca, Hg, I, K, Mg, Mo, Na, Sr, Ti and Tl in legumes, most often lead, cadmium and total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3The health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables grown in Babol city, IranInternational Archives of Health SciencesRead source →4Opinion of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety on the results of the Third French Total Diet Study (TDS3) - Acrylamide, aluminium, silver, cadmium, mercury and leadANSES Opinion, Request No 2019-SA-0010Read source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in legumes, as sold from 6,059 results in 5 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 1.1 to 430 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Which types of legumes have the lowest levels?
For cadmium, the HMI reference median was lowest for legumes, dried (4.77 µg/kg) and highest for legumes, canned (250 µg/kg); forms differ in water content, so this compares foods as sold or eaten, not uptake.7Toxic Elements in Beans from Zhejiang, Southeast China: Distribution and Probabilistic Health Risk AssessmentFoodsRead source →11Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadAlnakhla Journal of ScienceRead source →
Which regions report the lowest levels in legumes?
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, legumes, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (1.1 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (90 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in AFRO (1 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (43 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Does processing change heavy metals in legumes?
Only comparisons between forms in the same study are available, not before-and-after measurements of the same legumes.32Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakeMolecules 2010, 15, 7482-7497Read source → Legumes, canned (Legume, Riyadh city markets, May 2009) had lead higher at 19 µg/kg, against 14 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (legumes, as sold).32Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakeMolecules 2010, 15, 7482-7497Read source →
How much of the arsenic in legumes is inorganic?
Inorganic arsenic, the more toxic form, was measured in 37 results from 6 sources, far fewer than total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →34Speciation of arsenic in vegetables and their correlation with inorganic phosphate levelBangladesh Journal of Pharmacology 2007; 2: 88-94Read source →35Assessment of metal levels in foodstuffs from the Region of Valencia (Spain)Toxicology Reports 5 (2018) 654-670Read source →36The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →37Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597Read source →38Total Diet Study of metals and other elements in foodFood and Environment Research Agency report for the UK Food Standards Agency, Fera report 15/06, project FS102081Read source → Across 2 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported inorganic arsenic means and medians on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis ranged from 4.9 µg/kg (Marín et al. 2018) to 800 µg/kg (Laizu 2007).34Speciation of arsenic in vegetables and their correlation with inorganic phosphate levelBangladesh Journal of Pharmacology 2007; 2: 88-94Read source →35Assessment of metal levels in foodstuffs from the Region of Valencia (Spain)Toxicology Reports 5 (2018) 654-670Read source →
References
Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.
- GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsDataset
- FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsDataset
- The health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables grown in Babol city, IranPeer-reviewed
- Opinion of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety on the results of the Third French Total Diet Study (TDS3) - Acrylamide, aluminium, silver, cadmium, mercury and leadGovernment
- Detection of Heavy Metals in Some EdiblePeer-reviewed
- Anodic Stripping Voltammetry for Simultaneous Determination of Heavy Metals in VegetablesPeer-reviewed
- Toxic Elements in Beans from Zhejiang, Southeast China: Distribution and Probabilistic Health Risk AssessmentPeer-reviewed
- Human health risk assessment of heavy metals in vegetables of BangladeshPeer-reviewed
- Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthPeer-reviewed
- Essentail and Toxic Metals in Lebanese Marketed Canned Food: Impact of Metal CansPeer-reviewed
- Assessment of heavy metal and nitrate contamination in canned products from local markets in BaghdadPeer-reviewed
- Probabilistic assessment of the cumulative risk from dietary heavy metal exposure in Chongqing, China using a hazard-driven approachPeer-reviewed
- Assessment of heavy metal levels and associated health risks linked to vegetables grown in Noakhali region of BangladeshPeer-reviewed
- Expert Investigation Related to Cocoa and Chocolate Products: Final ReportIndustry
- Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in AlgeriaPeer-reviewed
- Analysis of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs and an Assessment of the Health Risks to the General Public via Consumption in Beijing, ChinaPeer-reviewed
- Evaluation of Some Toxic Heavy Metals in Rice and Beans Samples Cultivated in Yobe State, NigeriaPeer-reviewed
- Heavy Metal Exposure from FoodsPeer-reviewed
- Non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risk assessment of heavy metals in cooked beans and vegetables in Punjab, North IndiaPeer-reviewed
- Contamination of Heavy Metal(Loid)S in Cereals, Vegetables, and Legumes Purchased from Local Markets of Jiaozuo, China and The Associated Health Risk AssessmentPeer-reviewed
- Health Risk Assessment of Potentially Toxic Elements in Canned Pinto Beans and Fava Beans Distributed in Gilan Province of IranPeer-reviewed
- Determination of some heavy metals and their potential risk in selected vegetables on sale within Kaduna Metropolis, Kaduna State, NigeriaPeer-reviewed
- Determination of trace element levels in flowers and leaves of vicia faba by ICP-MSPeer-reviewed
- Evaluation of Health Risks Associated with Potential Toxic Elements in Selected Vegetables Consumed in the Western Black Sea Region of TurkeyPeer-reviewed
- Application of microwave-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry for ultra-trace determination of lead and cadmium in cereals and agricultural productsPeer-reviewed
- Toxic and Essential Metals in Staple Foods Commonly Consumed by Students in Ekiti State, South West, NigeriaPeer-reviewed
- Heavy Metal Contaminations and Health Risk Assessment from Fruits and Vegetables in Bangalore Rural Markets, Karnataka, IndiaPeer-reviewed
- Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Peer-reviewed
- Determination of Some Elements in Canned and Frozen Vegetables Sold in Balıkesir (Türkiye) Markets and Nutritional AssessmentPeer-reviewed
- Detection of heavy metals in common vegetables at Varaždin City Market, CroatiaPeer-reviewed
- Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Peer-reviewed
- Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakePeer-reviewed
- Contamination and health risk assessment of lead, arsenic, cadmium, and aluminum from a total diet study of Jilin Province, ChinaPeer-reviewed
- Speciation of arsenic in vegetables and their correlation with inorganic phosphate levelPeer-reviewed
- Assessment of metal levels in foodstuffs from the Region of Valencia (Spain)Peer-reviewed
- The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicGovernment
- Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationGovernment
- Total Diet Study of metals and other elements in foodGovernment
Sources
Browse Legumes Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.
Update history
22 October 2026: Rebuilt from every legumes record in the library: 90 occurrence sources, references by form and basis, same-study contrasts.
