Peanut butter in the HMI library has 211 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, monomethylarsonic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, V, AsIII, AsV, Ba, Mo, sum_of_species and Tl from 14 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →4The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Metallic ContaminantsCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →5Total Diet Study of metals and other elements in foodFood and Environment Research Agency report for the UK Food Standards Agency, Fera report 15/06, project FS102081Read source →6What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadHealthy Babies Bright FuturesRead source →
-
Metals measured:
Lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid and monomethylarsonic acid and others, in 211 results from 14 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →4The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Metallic ContaminantsCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →
-
Main drivers:
Form, basis and where the peanut butter was sampled; reporting limits decide how many results are non-detects.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →4The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Metallic ContaminantsCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →
-
Practical framing:
Ask for lot results with a quantification limit well below the limit that applies in the destination market.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →4The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Metallic ContaminantsCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →
Peanut butter overview
Peanut butter in the HMI library has 211 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, monomethylarsonic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, V, AsIII, AsV, Ba, Mo, sum_of_species and Tl from 14 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →4The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Metallic ContaminantsCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →5Total Diet Study of metals and other elements in foodFood and Environment Research Agency report for the UK Food Standards Agency, Fera report 15/06, project FS102081Read source →6What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadHealthy Babies Bright FuturesRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in peanut butter, as sold from 169 results in 3 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 6 to 11 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In the US Total Diet Study, peanut butter, as sold had a median lead result of 5.6 µg/kg across 3 composites from 2018–2020.2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →
Spungen et al. 2024 reported lead at 5.6 µg/kg (mean) in peanut butter, as sold from all samples.3Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source → Across 4 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported cadmium means and medians with the basis not stated ranged from 19 µg/kg (Zealand 2019) to 150 µg/kg (Centre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013).4The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Metallic ContaminantsCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →725th Australian Total Diet StudyFood Standards Australia New ZealandRead source →
For a buyer the practical points are the form bought, the basis a result is reported on, where the peanut butter came from and the laboratory’s reporting limit. Testing finds contamination but does not remove it.
What counts as peanut butter
This page covers peanut butter in 3 forms kept separate in every comparison: peanut butter, as sold (195 results), peanut butter, powder or ground (12 results) and peanut butter, cooked (4 results).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →4The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Metallic ContaminantsCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →5Total Diet Study of metals and other elements in foodFood and Environment Research Agency report for the UK Food Standards Agency, Fera report 15/06, project FS102081Read source →6What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadHealthy Babies Bright FuturesRead source →
Results stay on the basis each source reports: as sold or fresh weight, dry weight, or unstated. Dry-weight, as-sold and unstated results are never pooled, and no moisture conversion is applied.
Heavy metal contamination profile of peanut butter
The table holds every extracted peanut butter result: one row for each statistic a source reports for a form, group and metal, 211 rows in all, grouped by metal and form; percentiles, ranges and maxima for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →4The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Metallic ContaminantsCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →5Total Diet Study of metals and other elements in foodFood and Environment Research Agency report for the UK Food Standards Agency, Fera report 15/06, project FS102081Read source →6What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadHealthy Babies Bright FuturesRead source → Monitoring medians are HMI calculations from individual submissions; non-detects remain intervals between zero and the reporting limit and are never read as zero.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
33 rows can be rated against an HMI reference for the same form and basis, 22 rows have a direct same-study comparison, and the rest stay unrated with the reason recorded.
Comparison methods and scope
Each row is one statistic a source reports for one form of peanut butter, group and metal; percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Different forms and preparation states are kept apart, and dry-weight results never share a reference with as-sold or fresh-weight results. Ratings place a result against an HMI reference built from monitoring results and ordinary-setting medians for the same form and basis. Same-study contrasts compare a contaminated or treated site with its control, targeted with random sampling, a prepared form with the unprocessed one, or one group of a study with the median of its other groups. Held rows failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.
First displayed analyte: Lead: 15 findings from 6 sources. Each row retains its statistic and measurement basis.
Filter findings
210 of 210 findings · 20 analytes
About this table
| Food form | Collection scope | Finding (µg/kg) | Comparison | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
13 findings · 4 studies | ||||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2009–2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2011–2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2000–2010As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2009–2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000–2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011 | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, powder or groundBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 20_1262014–2015 | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, cookedHoulihan et al. 2019 | Snacks - Puffs; single product sample #136; purchased2019As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
15 findings · 7 studies | ||||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EMRO2016–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EMRO2017–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2009–2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO1999–2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000–2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011 | mean. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011 | mean. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldSpungen 2019 | all samples, TDS market baskets 2014-20162014–2016 | mean. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldZealand 2019 | national/regional composite samples, Australia2013–2014 | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, powder or groundBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 20_1262014–2015 | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, cookedHoulihan et al. 2019 | Snacks - Puffs; single product sample #136; purchased2019As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
39 findings · 4 studies | ||||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2023As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2022As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2009–2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000–2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | creamy peanut butterCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | creamy peanut butter, 18 oz plastic jar, grocery store (GCPB1)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | creamy peanut butter, 18 oz plastic jar, grocery store (JCPB1)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | crunchy salted peanut butter, 16 oz glass jar, gourmet storeCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | super chunk peanut butter, 18 oz plastic jar, grocery storeCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | 100% Natural Peanut Butter Creamy Unsalted (USA)2012 | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | 100% Natural Peanut Butter Crunchy (USA)2012 | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | All Natural Rich Roast Creamy Real Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | All Natural Rich Roast Creamy Real Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Chunky Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Classic Peanut Butter All Natural (USA)2012 | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter Made with Fresh Roasted Peanuts (USA)2012 | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter Rich Roasted Peanut Flavor (USA)2012 | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Crunchy Organic Easy Spread Peanut Butter Unsalted (Canada)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Crunchy Organic Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Crunchy Organic Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Crunchy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Extra Crunchy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Natural Creamy Peanut Butter Spread 90% Peanuts (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Natural Creamy Peanut Butter Spread Contains 90% Peanuts (USA)2012 | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Natural Crunchy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Natural Crunchy Peanut Butter Spread Contains 90% Peanuts (USA)2012 | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | No Stir Crunchy Peanut Butter (Canada)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Organic Creamy Peanut Butter (Canada)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Organic No Stir Peanut Butter Creamy (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Organic No Stir Peanut Butter Crunchy (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Organic Peanut Butter Creamy (USA)2012 | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Peanut Butter Crunchy (USA)2012 | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Reduced Fat Creamy Peanut Butter Fresh Roasted Peanut Taste2012 | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | The Original Powdered Organic Peanut Butter Gluten Free 100%2012 | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, powder or groundBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 20_1262014–2015 | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, cookedHoulihan et al. 2019 | Snacks - Puffs; single product sample #136; purchased2019As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
32 findings · 3 studies · 1 spread figure folded in | ||||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012 | all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011 | mean. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | 100% Natural Peanut Butter Creamy Unsalted (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | 100% Natural Peanut Butter Crunchy (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | All Natural Rich Roast Creamy Real Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | All Natural Rich Roast Creamy Real Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | all samples2012 | mean.Same samples: 3–5.9 µg/kg (range) | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | all samples2012 | range. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Chunky Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Classic Peanut Butter All Natural (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter Made with Fresh Roasted Peanuts (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter Rich Roasted Peanut Flavor (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Crunchy Organic Easy Spread Peanut Butter Unsalted (Canada)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Crunchy Organic Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Crunchy Organic Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Crunchy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Extra Crunchy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Natural Creamy Peanut Butter Spread 90% Peanuts (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Natural Creamy Peanut Butter Spread Contains 90% Peanuts (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Natural Crunchy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Natural Crunchy Peanut Butter Spread Contains 90% Peanuts (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | No Stir Crunchy Peanut Butter (Canada)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Organic Creamy Peanut Butter (Canada)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Organic No Stir Peanut Butter Creamy (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Organic No Stir Peanut Butter Crunchy (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Organic Peanut Butter Creamy (USA)2012 | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Peanut Butter Crunchy (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Reduced Fat Creamy Peanut Butter Fresh Roasted Peanut Taste2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | The Original Powdered Organic Peanut Butter Gluten Free 100%2012 | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, powder or groundBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 20_1262014–2015 | not detected. | ||
33 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | creamy peanut butterCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | creamy peanut butterCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | super chunk peanut butterCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | super chunk peanut butterCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | 100% Natural Peanut Butter Creamy Unsalted (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | 100% Natural Peanut Butter Crunchy (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | All Natural Rich Roast Creamy Real Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | All Natural Rich Roast Creamy Real Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Chunky Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Classic Peanut Butter All Natural (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter Made with Fresh Roasted Peanuts (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter Rich Roasted Peanut Flavor (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Crunchy Organic Easy Spread Peanut Butter Unsalted (Canada)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Crunchy Organic Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Crunchy Organic Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Crunchy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Extra Crunchy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Natural Creamy Peanut Butter Spread 90% Peanuts (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Natural Creamy Peanut Butter Spread Contains 90% Peanuts (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Natural Crunchy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Natural Crunchy Peanut Butter Spread Contains 90% Peanuts (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | No Stir Crunchy Peanut Butter (Canada)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Organic Creamy Peanut Butter (Canada)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Organic No Stir Peanut Butter Creamy (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Organic No Stir Peanut Butter Crunchy (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Organic Peanut Butter Creamy (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Peanut Butter Crunchy (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Reduced Fat Creamy Peanut Butter Fresh Roasted Peanut Taste2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | The Original Powdered Organic Peanut Butter Gluten Free 100%2012 | not detected. | ||
33 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | creamy peanut butterCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | creamy peanut butterCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | super chunk peanut butterCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | super chunk peanut butterCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | 100% Natural Peanut Butter Creamy Unsalted (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | 100% Natural Peanut Butter Crunchy (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | All Natural Rich Roast Creamy Real Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | All Natural Rich Roast Creamy Real Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Chunky Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Classic Peanut Butter All Natural (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter Made with Fresh Roasted Peanuts (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Creamy Peanut Butter Rich Roasted Peanut Flavor (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Crunchy Organic Easy Spread Peanut Butter Unsalted (Canada)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Crunchy Organic Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Crunchy Organic Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Crunchy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Extra Crunchy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Natural Creamy Peanut Butter Spread 90% Peanuts (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Natural Creamy Peanut Butter Spread Contains 90% Peanuts (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Natural Crunchy Peanut Butter (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Natural Crunchy Peanut Butter Spread Contains 90% Peanuts (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | No Stir Crunchy Peanut Butter (Canada)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Organic Creamy Peanut Butter (Canada)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Organic No Stir Peanut Butter Creamy (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Organic No Stir Peanut Butter Crunchy (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Organic Peanut Butter Creamy (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Peanut Butter Crunchy (USA)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | Reduced Fat Creamy Peanut Butter Fresh Roasted Peanut Taste2012 | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016 | The Original Powdered Organic Peanut Butter Gluten Free 100%2012 | not detected. | ||
4 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000–2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, powder or groundBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 20_1262014–2015 | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, cookedHoulihan et al. 2019 | Snacks - Puffs; single product sample #136; purchased2019As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
2 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Peanut butter, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011 | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, powder or groundBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 20_1262014–2015 | sample value. | ||
3 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Peanut butter, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, LB2000–2013As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, UB2000–2013As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, powder or groundBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 20_1262014–2015 | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011 | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, powder or groundBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 20_1262014–2015 | sample value. | ||
3 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011 | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, powder or groundBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 20_1262014–2015 | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011 | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, powder or groundBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 20_1262014–2015 | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011 | mean. | ||
4 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | creamy peanut butterCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | creamy peanut butterCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | super chunk peanut butterCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | super chunk peanut butterCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
4 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | creamy peanut butterCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | creamy peanut butterCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | super chunk peanut butterCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | super chunk peanut butterCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, powder or groundBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 20_1262014–2015 | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, as soldZealand 2011 | all samples2008 | mean. | ||
4 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | creamy peanut butterCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | creamy peanut butterCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | super chunk peanut butterCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peanut butter, as soldHovanec 2004 | super chunk peanut butterCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peanut butter, powder or groundBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 20_1262014–2015 | not detected. | ||
Shared dataset methods and interpretation
Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.
HMI peanut butter Pb reference · Peanut butter, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI peanut butter Pb reference · Peanut butter, as sold. Peanut butter, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤5.6 | 5.2–6.1 (bounded) | 6.1–20 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤5.2 | 5.2–6.1 (bounded) | 6.1–20 (bounded) |
28 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 25 | 50% |
| FDA Total Diet Study | 3 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peanut butter, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peanut-butter-831adf96b2af:bbb1456bb4d9
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peanut butter Pb reference · Peanut butter, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI peanut butter Pb reference · Peanut butter, cooked. Peanut butter, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Alternative weighting | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Houlihan et al. 2019 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peanut butter, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Houlihan et al. 2019 is the only compatible sampling family for peanut butter, cooked on this basis in the completed peanut butter ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peanut-butter-e402204cad93:8e07034934a3
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peanut butter Cd reference · Peanut butter, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI peanut butter Cd reference · Peanut butter, as sold. Peanut butter, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 42 | 53.6 | 60 |
| Alternative weighting | 42 | 55 | 60 |
45 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 42 | 50% |
| FDA Total Diet Study | 3 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peanut butter, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peanut-butter-1cc44d1a674f:2df71341842f
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peanut butter Cd reference · Peanut butter, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI peanut butter Cd reference · Peanut butter, cooked. Peanut butter, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 26 | 26 | 26 |
| Alternative weighting | 26 | 26 | 26 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Houlihan et al. 2019 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peanut butter, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Houlihan et al. 2019 is the only compatible sampling family for peanut butter, cooked on this basis in the completed peanut butter ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peanut-butter-875605ae1095:f47d662deef7
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peanut butter tAs reference · Peanut butter, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI peanut butter tAs reference · Peanut butter, as sold. Peanut butter, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 3.21–5.9 (bounded) | 6.9 | 9.9 |
| Alternative weighting | 3.21–5.9 (bounded) | 6.9 | 9.9 |
11 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 3 | 33% |
| FDA Total Diet Study | 3 | 33% |
| Hovanec 2004 | 5 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peanut butter, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peanut-butter-80e30576494f:fd74fdc203f5
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peanut butter tAs reference · Peanut butter, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI peanut butter tAs reference · Peanut butter, cooked. Peanut butter, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤4.4 | ≤4.4 | ≤4.4 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤4.4 | ≤4.4 | ≤4.4 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Houlihan et al. 2019 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peanut butter, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Houlihan et al. 2019 is the only compatible sampling family for peanut butter, cooked on this basis in the completed peanut butter ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peanut-butter-798e4814f49e:89b8d44b35c2
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peanut butter iAs reference · Peanut butter, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI peanut butter iAs reference · Peanut butter, as sold. Peanut butter, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤3 | 2–3.5 (bounded) | 4 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤3 | 2–3.5 (bounded) | 4 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peanut butter, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for peanut butter, as sold on this basis in the completed peanut butter ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peanut-butter-7d8ae3dc3723:a389bf1e0389
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peanut butter DMA reference · Peanut butter, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI peanut butter DMA reference · Peanut butter, as sold. Peanut butter, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 5.85 | 10.4 | 15.5 |
| Alternative weighting | 5.85 | 10.4 | 15.5 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Hovanec 2004 | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peanut butter, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Hovanec 2004 is the only compatible sampling family for peanut butter, as sold on this basis in the completed peanut butter ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peanut-butter-d0acaa45bd21:35f59cec608b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peanut butter MMA reference · Peanut butter, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI peanut butter MMA reference · Peanut butter, as sold. Peanut butter, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 4.9 | 6.4 | 8.5 |
| Alternative weighting | 4.9 | 6.4 | 8.5 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Hovanec 2004 | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peanut butter, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Hovanec 2004 is the only compatible sampling family for peanut butter, as sold on this basis in the completed peanut butter ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peanut-butter-525d12dd0a8b:79674d79e4c7
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peanut butter tHg reference · Peanut butter, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI peanut butter tHg reference · Peanut butter, as sold. Peanut butter, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | ≤3 | ≤6.25 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | ≤3 | ≤6.25 |
5 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 50% |
| FDA Total Diet Study | 3 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peanut butter, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peanut-butter-fd438d1613d9:55ed05f2e422
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peanut butter tHg reference · Peanut butter, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI peanut butter tHg reference · Peanut butter, cooked. Peanut butter, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.278 | ≤0.278 | ≤0.278 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.278 | ≤0.278 | ≤0.278 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Houlihan et al. 2019 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peanut butter, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Houlihan et al. 2019 is the only compatible sampling family for peanut butter, cooked on this basis in the completed peanut butter ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peanut-butter-2e9ee198547d:b5cff91842ff
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peanut butter Ni reference · Peanut butter, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI peanut butter Ni reference · Peanut butter, as sold. Peanut butter, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 450 | 460 | 890 |
| Alternative weighting | 450 | 460 | 890 |
3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 3 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peanut butter, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for peanut butter, as sold on this basis in the completed peanut butter ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peanut-butter-b3c8bd034478:4b60dbba8cfa
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peanut butter Cr reference · Peanut butter, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI peanut butter Cr reference · Peanut butter, as sold. Peanut butter, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 3 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peanut butter, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for peanut butter, as sold on this basis in the completed peanut butter ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peanut-butter-3835a46124f0:d4ff2f8d80d1
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peanut butter Sn reference · Peanut butter, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI peanut butter Sn reference · Peanut butter, as sold. Peanut butter, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤10 | ≤10 | ≤10 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤10 | ≤10 | ≤10 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peanut butter, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for peanut butter, as sold on this basis in the completed peanut butter ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peanut-butter-90595cc8dec8:0b8ffe7420a1
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peanut butter U reference · Peanut butter, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI peanut butter U reference · Peanut butter, as sold. Peanut butter, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 3 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peanut butter, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for peanut butter, as sold on this basis in the completed peanut butter ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peanut-butter-6c5960389f3c:708623031e1b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peanut butter AsIII reference · Peanut butter, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI peanut butter AsIII reference · Peanut butter, as sold. Peanut butter, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1.5 | 1.55 | 1.6 |
| Alternative weighting | 1.5 | 1.55 | 1.6 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Hovanec 2004 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peanut butter, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Hovanec 2004 is the only compatible sampling family for peanut butter, as sold on this basis in the completed peanut butter ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peanut-butter-7d1e486cc500:a98bea6a3ece
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peanut butter AsV reference · Peanut butter, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI peanut butter AsV reference · Peanut butter, as sold. Peanut butter, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 6.2 | 6.25 | 6.3 |
| Alternative weighting | 6.2 | 6.25 | 6.3 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Hovanec 2004 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peanut butter, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Hovanec 2004 is the only compatible sampling family for peanut butter, as sold on this basis in the completed peanut butter ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peanut-butter-0cff8354bb6d:b6f21117ce42
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peanut butter sum_of_species reference · Peanut butter, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI peanut butter sum_of_species reference · Peanut butter, as sold. Peanut butter, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 18.5 | 20.8 | 23.9 |
| Alternative weighting | 18.5 | 20.8 | 23.9 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Hovanec 2004 | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peanut butter, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Hovanec 2004 is the only compatible sampling family for peanut butter, as sold on this basis in the completed peanut butter ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peanut-butter-fc04f4785900:c18f1a75d5bd
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
The source reports only a percentile, range or maximum for these samples, with no mean or median to place against the reference. Spread figures that do have a mean or median are shown on that row instead.
The result is below a reporting limit, and the range from zero to that limit crosses more than one band.
The HMI reference for this form has fewer than four units or no measurable spread, below the display minimum.
The result is on a basis (dry weight, or not stated) that no HMI reference for this form uses, so it cannot be placed.
Reporting limits overlap the study comparison, so no direction can be shown.
No findings match these filters. Change the selection or reset to show all source findings.
How metals reach peanut butter
No study in the library compared peanut butter from contaminated and ordinary settings, so the routes by which metals reach it are not measured here.
Which forms and regions measured lower
The HMI reference for lead in peanut butter, as sold pools 28 subgroup units from 2 sampling families, with a median of between 5.2 and 6.1 µg/kg and a middle half spanning below 5.6 (lower quartile) and between 6.1 and 20 µg/kg (upper quartile).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source → For cadmium in peanut butter, as sold, the reference median was 53.6 µg/kg, with a middle half from 42 to 60 µg/kg across 45 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source → For total arsenic in peanut butter, as sold, the reference median was 6.9 µg/kg, with a middle half from between 3.21 and 5.9 to 9.9 µg/kg across 11 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →8Arsenic speciation in commercially available peanut butter spread by IC-ICP-MSJournal of Analytical Atomic SpectrometryRead source →
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, peanut butter, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (6 µg/kg) and the highest in PAHO (11 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in PAHO (14.2 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (119 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Targeted peanut butter, as sold samples in WPRO had cadmium lower at 19 µg/kg, against 119 µg/kg for WPRO in the same study.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
In one study, total arsenic across 18 groups of peanut butter ranged from 6.1 µg/kg (Chunky Peanut Butter (USA)) to 40.8 µg/kg (Natural Creamy Peanut Butter Spread Contains 90% Peanuts (USA)); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.9Analytical Results from Inorganic Arsenic in Rice Cereals for Infants, Non-Rice Infant Cereal and Other Foods Commonly Eaten by Infants and ToddlersU.S. Food and Drug AdministrationRead source →
Processing, cooking and preparation
No processing study for metals in this food is in the library yet.
Mitigation for peanut butter
Lot testing against the applicable limit is the check that can be verified.
No measured way to lower metals in this food is in the library yet.
Trade-offs and limits of controls
Metals do not move together, so a lot that passes a lead limit says little about cadmium, arsenic or nickel unless those are tested as well.
Testing peanut butter for metals
Results depend on the method and its reporting limit. Reporting limits for lead ranged from 1 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 90 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Reporting limits for cadmium ranged from 1 µg/kg (FDA Total Diet Study) to 12 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source → Reporting limits for total arsenic ranged from 0.4 µg/kg (Hovanec 2004) to 200 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →8Arsenic speciation in commercially available peanut butter spread by IC-ICP-MSJournal of Analytical Atomic SpectrometryRead source →
A useful lot result names the form, the basis and a quantification limit well below the limit that applies.
Buying and verifying peanut butter
No maximum level for metals in peanut butter was verified from primary text for this page; buyers should confirm the limit that applies in the destination market.
Exposure from peanut butter
No source in the library converted peanut butter concentrations into a verified estimate of intake for a defined population. Concentrations describe the food, not individual risk.
Evidence review and remaining gaps
Every source record that names peanut butter was decided on its content: 14 occurrence extracted, 14 records in all. The occurrence table renders every extracted result; held values remain visible with their reason.
References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.
Peanut butter FAQs
What heavy metals are found in peanut butter?
The library reports lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, monomethylarsonic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, V, AsIII, AsV, Ba, Mo, sum_of_species and Tl in peanut butter, most often lead, cadmium and total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →4The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Metallic ContaminantsCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in peanut butter, as sold from 169 results in 3 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 6 to 11 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Which regions report the lowest levels in peanut butter?
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, peanut butter, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (6 µg/kg) and the highest in PAHO (11 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in PAHO (14.2 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (119 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
How much of the arsenic in peanut butter is inorganic?
Inorganic arsenic, the more toxic form, was measured in 34 results from 4 sources, far fewer than total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →5Total Diet Study of metals and other elements in foodFood and Environment Research Agency report for the UK Food Standards Agency, Fera report 15/06, project FS102081Read source →10The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →9Analytical Results from Inorganic Arsenic in Rice Cereals for Infants, Non-Rice Infant Cereal and Other Foods Commonly Eaten by Infants and ToddlersU.S. Food and Drug AdministrationRead source → Across 2 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported inorganic arsenic means and medians with the basis not stated ranged from 3.4 µg/kg (U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2016) to 5 µg/kg (Centre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012).10The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →9Analytical Results from Inorganic Arsenic in Rice Cereals for Infants, Non-Rice Infant Cereal and Other Foods Commonly Eaten by Infants and ToddlersU.S. Food and Drug AdministrationRead source →
References
Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.
- GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsDataset
- FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsDataset
- Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Peer-reviewed
- The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Metallic ContaminantsGovernment
- Total Diet Study of metals and other elements in foodGovernment
- What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadNGO
- 25th Australian Total Diet StudyGovernment
- Arsenic speciation in commercially available peanut butter spread by IC-ICP-MSPeer-reviewed
- Analytical Results from Inorganic Arsenic in Rice Cereals for Infants, Non-Rice Infant Cereal and Other Foods Commonly Eaten by Infants and ToddlersDataset
- The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicGovernment
Sources
Browse Peanut butter Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.
Update history
22 October 2026: Rebuilt from every peanut butter record in the library: 14 occurrence sources, references by form and basis, same-study contrasts.
