Chicken in the HMI library has 1,994 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, total mercury, methylmercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ag, As_extractable, As_nonextractable, AsIII, AsV, B, Ba, Be, Bi, Ca, CrIII, CrVI, I, K, Li, Mg, Mo, Na, P, REE_sum, Roxarsone, Si, Sr, Tl and Unknown arsenic (As) species from 61 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Keywords: Meat, Heavy metal, Toxic elements, Health risk, Exposure assessmentPeer-reviewed articleRead source →4Health effects of heavy metals in meat and poultry consumption in Noakhali, BangladeshToxicology Reports 12 (2024) 168-177Read source →5Influence of Cooking by Boiling on Lead and Cadmium in Meat and Liver of ChickensThe Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Medicine 48(2):32-37Read source →6Concentration of Essential, Toxic, and Rare Earth Elements in Ready-to-Eat Baby Purees from the Spanish MarketNutrients 15(14):3251Read source →
-
Metals measured:
Lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid and total mercury and others, in 1,994 results from 61 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Keywords: Meat, Heavy metal, Toxic elements, Health risk, Exposure assessmentPeer-reviewed articleRead source →4Health effects of heavy metals in meat and poultry consumption in Noakhali, BangladeshToxicology Reports 12 (2024) 168-177Read source →
-
Main drivers:
Chicken, as sold from Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, Abuja had lead higher at 3,450 µg/kg, against 1,400 µg/kg for Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, Abuja in the same study.7Content of Heavy Metals in Poultry and Local (Free Range) Chickens raised within Gwagwalada Area Council of Abuja, NigeriaCognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, Vol. 2, Issue 9, September 2022, pp. 43-57Read source →
-
Practical framing:
Ask for lot results with a quantification limit well below the limit that applies in the destination market.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Keywords: Meat, Heavy metal, Toxic elements, Health risk, Exposure assessmentPeer-reviewed articleRead source →4Health effects of heavy metals in meat and poultry consumption in Noakhali, BangladeshToxicology Reports 12 (2024) 168-177Read source →
Chicken overview
Chicken in the HMI library has 1,994 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, total mercury, methylmercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ag, As_extractable, As_nonextractable, AsIII, AsV, B, Ba, Be, Bi, Ca, CrIII, CrVI, I, K, Li, Mg, Mo, Na, P, REE_sum, Roxarsone, Si, Sr, Tl and Unknown As species from 61 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Keywords: Meat, Heavy metal, Toxic elements, Health risk, Exposure assessmentPeer-reviewed articleRead source →4Health effects of heavy metals in meat and poultry consumption in Noakhali, BangladeshToxicology Reports 12 (2024) 168-177Read source →5Influence of Cooking by Boiling on Lead and Cadmium in Meat and Liver of ChickensThe Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Medicine 48(2):32-37Read source →6Concentration of Essential, Toxic, and Rare Earth Elements in Ready-to-Eat Baby Purees from the Spanish MarketNutrients 15(14):3251Read source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in chicken, as sold from 7,752 results in 3 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 7.3 to 448 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In the US Total Diet Study, chicken, cooked had a median lead result below 4 µg/kg across 27 composites from 2017–2020.2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →
Across 11 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported lead means and medians on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis ranged from 2 µg/kg (Spungen et al. 2024) to 7,540 µg/kg (Chowdhury et al. 2024).4Health effects of heavy metals in meat and poultry consumption in Noakhali, BangladeshToxicology Reports 12 (2024) 168-177Read source →8Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source → For cadmium, 12 studies on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis reported means and medians from 0.3 µg/kg (Mathaiyan et al. 2021) to 400 µg/kg (Chowdhury et al. 2024).4Health effects of heavy metals in meat and poultry consumption in Noakhali, BangladeshToxicology Reports 12 (2024) 168-177Read source →9Assessment of Pb, Cd, As and Hg concentration in edible parts of broiler in major metropolitan cities of Tamil Nadu, IndiaToxicology Reports 8 (2021) 668-675Read source → Higher results came from contaminated or exposed settings rather than ordinary supply. Chicken, as sold from conventional factory feed, floor housing (1st control group) (experiment) had lead higher at 24.7 µg/kg, against 3.53 µg/kg for conventional factory feed, cage housing (2nd control group) in the same study.10Organic Meat Production of Broiler Chickens Hubbard Redbro CrossInternational Journal of Veterinary Science 10(1):62-68Read source →
For a buyer the practical points are the form bought, the basis a result is reported on, where the chicken came from and the laboratory’s reporting limit. Testing finds contamination but does not remove it.
What counts as chicken
This page covers chicken in 6 forms kept separate in every comparison: chicken, as sold (1,726 results), chicken, cooked (153 results), chicken, frozen (54 results), chicken, canned (37 results), chicken, powder or ground (20 results) and chicken, peeled or flesh (4 results).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Keywords: Meat, Heavy metal, Toxic elements, Health risk, Exposure assessmentPeer-reviewed articleRead source →4Health effects of heavy metals in meat and poultry consumption in Noakhali, BangladeshToxicology Reports 12 (2024) 168-177Read source →5Influence of Cooking by Boiling on Lead and Cadmium in Meat and Liver of ChickensThe Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Medicine 48(2):32-37Read source →6Concentration of Essential, Toxic, and Rare Earth Elements in Ready-to-Eat Baby Purees from the Spanish MarketNutrients 15(14):3251Read source → Foods made from chicken that have their own pages, such as chicken broth, chicken noodle soup, chicken nuggets and chicken potpie, are covered there.
Results stay on the basis each source reports: as sold or fresh weight, dry weight, or unstated. Dry-weight, as-sold and unstated results are never pooled, and no moisture conversion is applied.
Heavy metal contamination profile of chicken
The table holds every extracted chicken result: one row for each statistic a source reports for a form, group and metal, 1,994 rows in all, grouped by metal and form; percentiles, ranges and maxima for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Keywords: Meat, Heavy metal, Toxic elements, Health risk, Exposure assessmentPeer-reviewed articleRead source →4Health effects of heavy metals in meat and poultry consumption in Noakhali, BangladeshToxicology Reports 12 (2024) 168-177Read source →5Influence of Cooking by Boiling on Lead and Cadmium in Meat and Liver of ChickensThe Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Medicine 48(2):32-37Read source →6Concentration of Essential, Toxic, and Rare Earth Elements in Ready-to-Eat Baby Purees from the Spanish MarketNutrients 15(14):3251Read source → Monitoring medians are HMI calculations from individual submissions; non-detects remain intervals between zero and the reporting limit and are never read as zero.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
293 rows can be rated against an HMI reference for the same form and basis, 456 rows have a direct same-study comparison, and the rest stay unrated with the reason recorded. 167 values from 18 sources failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.3Keywords: Meat, Heavy metal, Toxic elements, Health risk, Exposure assessmentPeer-reviewed articleRead source →5Influence of Cooking by Boiling on Lead and Cadmium in Meat and Liver of ChickensThe Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Medicine 48(2):32-37Read source →7Content of Heavy Metals in Poultry and Local (Free Range) Chickens raised within Gwagwalada Area Council of Abuja, NigeriaCognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, Vol. 2, Issue 9, September 2022, pp. 43-57Read source →11Assessment of non-essential heavy metals in ready-to-eat chicken meat products of Chennai cityInternational Journal of Chemical StudiesRead source →12Human health risk assessment of edible body parts of chicken through heavy metals and trace elements quantitative analysisPLoS ONERead source →13Human health risk assessment of some important trace elements in boneless whole chicken meatF1000Research 2022, 11:276 (version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations)Read source →14Technogenic contamination of livestock- and fish-derived food products with heavy metals and radionuclides in industrial and post-nuclear regions of KazakhstanVeterinary World 2026, 19(3): 1052-1068Read source →15Carcinogens in Food: Evaluating the Presence of Cadmium, Lead, in Poultry Meat in South IndiaAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 22(11):3507-3511Read source →16Assessment and health risk study of some heavy metals in instant soup and chicken stock products from Jordanian marketAfrican Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and DevelopmentRead source →17The Measurement of Cadmium, Zinc and Silver in Chicken Meat in Isfahan Province, IranIranian Journal of ToxicologyRead source →18HEALTH RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH HEAVY METALS IN COMMERCIAL CHICKEN MEAT VIA CONSUMPTION WITHIN SOUTHERN NIGERIAAfrican Journal of Health, Safety and Environment 1(1):22-37Read source →19Analysis of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs and an Assessment of the Health Risks to the General Public via Consumption in Beijing, ChinaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthRead source →20Risks assessment of toxic metals in canned meat and chickenFood ResearchRead source →21Analysis and exposure assessment of some heavy metals in foodstuffs from Ismailia city, EgyptToxicological & Environmental ChemistryRead source →22Effect of silicon and mineral extract on heavy metals balance and accumulation rate in the muscle tissue of poultryUkrainian Journal of Ecology 9(4):742-748Read source →23Chemical and microbiological quality of commercial fresh and frozen chicken drumstick in Umuhia, NigeriaInternational Journal of Food, Agriculture, and Natural ResourcesRead source →24Speciation of arsenic in chicken thigh and breast meat using solvent extraction and selective reduction HG-AASMethodsX 16 (2026) 103937Read source →25Estimation of Chromium (VI) in various body parts of Local ChickenJournal of the Chemical Society of PakistanRead source →
Comparison methods and scope
Each row is one statistic a source reports for one form of chicken, group and metal; percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Different forms and preparation states are kept apart, and dry-weight results never share a reference with as-sold or fresh-weight results. Ratings place a result against an HMI reference built from monitoring results and ordinary-setting medians for the same form and basis. Same-study contrasts compare a contaminated or treated site with its control, targeted with random sampling, a prepared form with the unprocessed one, or one group of a study with the median of its other groups. Held rows failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.
First displayed analyte: Lead: 248 findings from 45 sources. Each row retains its statistic and measurement basis.
Filter findings
1579 of 1579 findings · 45 analytes
About this table
| Food form | Collection scope | Finding (µg/kg) | Comparison | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
182 findings · 37 studies · 33 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2001–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO1999As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2015As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014–2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2015As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2000–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014–2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2012–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005–2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2009–2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2002As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2012As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2021 | chicken, Zhejiang2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | Poultry2022As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | Sonali Chicken2022As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | Sonali Chicken2022As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHashem et al. 2024 | fresh chickenCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHashem et al. 2024 | fresh chicken, slaughtered locally, Al-Karkh, Baghdad; uncookedCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHashem et al. 2024 | imported frozen chickenCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHashem et al. 2024 | imported frozen chickenCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (overall mean)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (overall mean)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Gabtoli market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Gabtoli market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Karwan Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Karwan Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Madhya Badda market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Madhya Badda market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Mohammadpur Town Hall Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Mohammadpur Town Hall Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Rayer Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Rayer Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Uttara market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Uttara market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIslam et al. 2015 | Bogra district, all samples2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamouh et al. 2024 | breast from butcher shops/slaughterhousesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 20 µg/kg (minimum); 790 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamouh et al. 2024 | breast from butcher shops/slaughterhousesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamouh et al. 2024 | breast from butcher shops/slaughterhousesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamouh et al. 2024 | thigh from butcher shops/slaughterhousesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 30 µg/kg (minimum); 920 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamouh et al. 2024 | thigh from butcher shops/slaughterhousesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamouh et al. 2024 | thigh from butcher shops/slaughterhousesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLoutfy et al. 2012 | Ismailia city markets, pooled samples2007As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Meat and meat products group, Region of Valencia TDS 2010-20112010–2011As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 2.5 µg/kg (minimum); 4.4 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Meat and meat products group, Region of Valencia TDS 2010-20112010–2011As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Meat and meat products group, Region of Valencia TDS 2010-20112010–2011As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | all five cities2017As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 563 µg/kg (minimum); 4.8 µg/kg (minimum); 4,960 µg/kg (maximum); 1,270 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | all five cities2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | all five cities2017As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | all five cities2017As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | all five cities2017As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | all five cities2017As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Chennai2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Chennai2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Coimbatore2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Coimbatore2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Madurai2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Madurai2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Salem2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Salem2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Trichy2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Trichy2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Ado-Ekiti markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 61 µg/kg (minimum); 1,150 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Ado-Ekiti markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Ado-Ekiti markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Akure markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 9 µg/kg (minimum); 12 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Akure markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Akure markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Benin City markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 11 µg/kg (minimum); 26 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Benin City markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Benin City markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Warri markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 111 µg/kg (minimum); 154 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Warri markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Warri markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl 2010 | Meat and meat products, Riyadh city markets, May 20092009Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 3 µg/kg (minimum); 43 µg/kg (percentile); 79 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Brazil2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Iran2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Saudi Arabia (printed 'Sudian')2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Turkey2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | Iraqi farm-bred chicken (local)2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | Iraqi house-bred chicken (local)2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldCosmas et al. 2024 | Farm ACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldCosmas et al. 2024 | Farm BCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldCosmas et al. 2024 | Farm CCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldCosmas et al. 2024 | Farm DCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldFaraj et al. 2023 | BazyanCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldFaraj et al. 2023 | DukanCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldFaraj et al. 2023 | MergapanCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldFaraj et al. 2023 | TanjaroCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | chicken burger from Saudi-produced brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | fresh chilled carcasses, three Saudi brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLiang et al. 2019 | Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahbub et al. 2018 | Broiler, 7 samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahbub et al. 2018 | Broiler, 7 samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahbub et al. 2018 | Cockerel, 3 samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahbub et al. 2018 | Spent hen, 4 samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldPain et al. 2023 | raw chicken dog food product CM2021–2022Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRokanuzzaman et al. 2022 | all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRokanuzzaman et al. 2022 | all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRokanuzzaman et al. 2022 | all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2018 | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Abai district, Abai region (formerly the East Kazakhstan region)2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Abai district, Karaganda region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Akkol district, Akmola region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Aksuat district, Abai region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Aktogay district, Karaganda region2024–2025 | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Ayagoz district, Abai region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Bukhar-Zhyrau district, Karaganda region2024–2025 | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Bulandy district, Akmola region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Zerenda district, Akmola region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 6_362014–2015 | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldCantoral et al. 2024 | Meats, sausages, and eggs (retail, Mexico City)2022–2023 | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (percentile); 30 µg/kg (percentile); 20 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 20 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 20 µg/kg (percentile); 40 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJamil et al. 2015 | Lahore markets (5 markets pooled)2013 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJamil et al. 2015 | Lahore markets (5 markets pooled)2013 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | conventional factory feed, cage housing (2nd control group)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | conventional factory feed, cage housing (2nd control group)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | conventional factory feed, floor housing (1st control group)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | conventional factory feed, floor housing (1st control group)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | eco-feedCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | eco-feedCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | eco-feedCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | eco-feedCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 3 g cumin/kg (T2)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 3 g cumin/kg (T2)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 6 g cumin/kg (T3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 6 g cumin/kg (T3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 9 g cumin/kg (T4)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 9 g cumin/kg (T4)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet without cumin (T1 control)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet without cumin (T1 control)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOkolo et al. 2022 | fresh drumstick, poultry farms around UmuahiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOkolo et al. 2022 | frozen drumstick, grocery shops, UmuahiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldPappuswamy et al. 2021 | all three districts (range for this study)Collection date unreported | range. | ||
| Chicken, as soldPappuswamy et al. 2021 | local chickens, central market, Coimbatore district, Tamil NaduCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldPappuswamy et al. 2021 | local chickens, central market, Erode district, Tamil NaduCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldPappuswamy et al. 2021 | local chickens, central market, Namakkal district, Tamil NaduCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | control group, main diet (Table 6)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | control group, main diet (Table 6)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | experimental groupCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | experimental groupCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | household-kept hens, tissue content (Table 3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | household-kept hens, tissue content (Table 3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | household-kept hens, tissue content (Table 3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldTodorovska et al. 2023 | fresh meat, unit 1 (different manufacturer or supplier)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldTodorovska et al. 2023 | fresh meat, unit 2 (different manufacturer or supplier)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldTodorovska et al. 2023 | fresh meat, unit 3 (different manufacturer or supplier)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
12 findings · 4 studies | ||||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, cookedJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedSaulawa et al. 2024 | Chicken meat, Kaduna MetropolisCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
11 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | all broiler meat, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | frozen imported carcasses (Brazil, France, USA), Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, frozenAltalib et al. 2025 | Chicken2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | Brazilian originCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | Brazilian originCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | local company A (Erbil)Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | local company A (Erbil)Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | local company B (Erbil)Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | local company B (Erbil)Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | Turkish originCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | Turkish originCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
4 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Italy, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Philippines, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Poland, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedMorshdy et al. 2023 | all samples (Sharkia Governorate retail)2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
5 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, powder or groundSafwan et al. 2023 | retail product 12020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, powder or groundSafwan et al. 2023 | retail product 22020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, powder or groundSafwan et al. 2023 | retail product 32020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, powder or groundSafwan et al. 2023 | retail product 42020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, powder or groundSafwan et al. 2023 | retail product 52020As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, peeled or fleshJamil et al. 2015 | Lahore markets (5 markets pooled)2013 | mean. | ||
201 findings · 39 studies · 21 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EMRO2013–2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EMRO2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2004As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2007As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2006As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2016–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2015–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2011–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2018–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2005As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2002As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2021 | chicken, Zhejiang2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | Poultry2022As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | Sonali Chicken2022As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | Sonali Chicken2022As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHashem et al. 2024 | fresh chickenCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHashem et al. 2024 | fresh chicken, slaughtered locally, Al-Karkh, Baghdad; uncookedCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHashem et al. 2024 | imported frozen chickenCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHashem et al. 2024 | imported frozen chickenCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (overall mean)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (overall mean)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Gabtoli market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Gabtoli market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Karwan Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Karwan Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Madhya Badda market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Madhya Badda market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Mohammadpur Town Hall Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Mohammadpur Town Hall Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Rayer Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Rayer Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Uttara market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Uttara market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIslam et al. 2015 | Bogra district, all samples2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamouh et al. 2024 | breast from butcher shops/slaughterhousesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (minimum); 240 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamouh et al. 2024 | breast from butcher shops/slaughterhousesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamouh et al. 2024 | breast from butcher shops/slaughterhousesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamouh et al. 2024 | thigh from butcher shops/slaughterhousesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (minimum); 300 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamouh et al. 2024 | thigh from butcher shops/slaughterhousesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamouh et al. 2024 | thigh from butcher shops/slaughterhousesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLoutfy et al. 2012 | Ismailia city markets, pooled samples2007As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | range. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2021 | breastCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2021 | heartCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2021 | liverCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2021 | thighCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Meat and meat products group, Region of Valencia TDS 2010-20112010–2011As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | all five cities2017As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 14.2 µg/kg (minimum); 26.1 µg/kg (maximum); 164 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | all five cities2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | all five cities2017As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | all five cities2017As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | all five cities2017As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | all five cities2017As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Chennai2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Chennai2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Coimbatore2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Coimbatore2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Madurai2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Madurai2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Salem2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Salem2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Trichy2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Trichy2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Ado-Ekiti markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 212 µg/kg (minimum); 1,010 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Ado-Ekiti markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Ado-Ekiti markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Akure markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (minimum); 11 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Akure markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Akure markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Benin City markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 9 µg/kg (minimum); 11 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Benin City markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Benin City markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Warri markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 22 µg/kg (minimum); 45 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Warri markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Warri markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldZheng et al. 2025 | single composite of nine retail packages, Zhejiang2024As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 6 µg/kg (minimum); 24 µg/kg (maximum); 10 µg/kg (percentile); 16 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Brazil2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Iran2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Saudi Arabia (printed 'Sudian')2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Turkey2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | Iraqi farm-bred chicken (local)2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | Iraqi house-bred chicken (local)2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldCosmas et al. 2024 | Farm ACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldCosmas et al. 2024 | Farm BCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldCosmas et al. 2024 | Farm CCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldCosmas et al. 2024 | Farm DCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldEdet et al. 2024 | commercial poultry farm, Abak, Akwa Ibom State2022Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldFaraj et al. 2023 | BazyanCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldFaraj et al. 2023 | DukanCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldFaraj et al. 2023 | MergapanCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldFaraj et al. 2023 | TanjaroCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | chicken burger from Saudi-produced brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | fresh chilled carcasses, three Saudi brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLiang et al. 2019 | Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMorshed et al. 2024 | feed group C0 (control)Collection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMorshed et al. 2024 | feed group C1 (feed spiked at 0.9 mg/kg Cd)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMorshed et al. 2024 | feed group C2 (feed spiked at 1.4 mg/kg Cd)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMorshed et al. 2024 | feed group C3 (feed spiked at 2.03 mg/kg Cd)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMorshed et al. 2024 | feed group C4 (feed spiked at 2.63 mg/kg Cd)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMorshed et al. 2024 | feed group C5 (feed spiked at 9.18 mg/kg Cd)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMorshed et al. 2024 | feed group C6 (feed spiked at 22.67 mg/kg Cd)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMorshed et al. 2024 | feed group C7 (feed spiked at 40.46 mg/kg Cd)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRokanuzzaman et al. 2022 | all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRokanuzzaman et al. 2022 | all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRokanuzzaman et al. 2022 | all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2018 | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Abai district, Abai region (formerly the East Kazakhstan region)2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Abai district, Karaganda region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Akkol district, Akmola region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Aksuat district, Abai region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Aktogay district, Karaganda region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Ayagoz district, Abai region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Bukhar-Zhyrau district, Karaganda region2024–2025 | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Bulandy district, Akmola region2024–2025 | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Zerenda district, Akmola region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 6_362014–2015 | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011 | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 40 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 100 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJamil et al. 2015 | Lahore markets (5 markets pooled)2013 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJamil et al. 2015 | Lahore markets (5 markets pooled)2013 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | conventional factory feed, cage housing (2nd control group)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | conventional factory feed, cage housing (2nd control group)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | conventional factory feed, floor housing (1st control group)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | conventional factory feed, floor housing (1st control group)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | eco-feedCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | eco-feedCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | eco-feedCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | eco-feedCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 3 g cumin/kg (T2)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 3 g cumin/kg (T2)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 6 g cumin/kg (T3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 6 g cumin/kg (T3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 9 g cumin/kg (T4)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 9 g cumin/kg (T4)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet without cumin (T1 control)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet without cumin (T1 control)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOkolo et al. 2022 | fresh drumstick, poultry farms around UmuahiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOkolo et al. 2022 | frozen drumstick, grocery shops, UmuahiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldPappuswamy et al. 2021 | all three districts (range for this study)Collection date unreported | range. | ||
| Chicken, as soldPappuswamy et al. 2021 | local chickens, central market, Coimbatore district, Tamil NaduCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldPappuswamy et al. 2021 | local chickens, central market, Erode district, Tamil NaduCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldPappuswamy et al. 2021 | local chickens, central market, Namakkal district, Tamil NaduCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | control group, main diet (Table 6)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | control group, main diet (Table 6)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | experimental groupCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | experimental groupCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | household-kept hens, tissue content (Table 3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | household-kept hens, tissue content (Table 3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | household-kept hens, tissue content (Table 3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldTodorovska et al. 2023 | fresh meat, unit 1 (different manufacturer or supplier)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldTodorovska et al. 2023 | fresh meat, unit 2 (different manufacturer or supplier)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldTodorovska et al. 2023 | fresh meat, unit 3 (different manufacturer or supplier)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
12 findings · 4 studies | ||||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedSaulawa et al. 2024 | Chicken meat, Kaduna MetropolisCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
3 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | all broiler meat, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | frozen imported carcasses (Brazil, France, USA), Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, frozenAltalib et al. 2025 | Chicken2025 | mean. | ||
4 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Italy, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Philippines, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Poland, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedMorshdy et al. 2023 | all samples (Sharkia Governorate retail)2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
5 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, powder or groundSafwan et al. 2023 | retail product 12020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, powder or groundSafwan et al. 2023 | retail product 22020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, powder or groundSafwan et al. 2023 | retail product 32020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, powder or groundSafwan et al. 2023 | retail product 42020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, powder or groundSafwan et al. 2023 | retail product 52020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, peeled or fleshJamil et al. 2015 | Lahore markets (5 markets pooled)2013 | mean. | ||
113 findings · 21 studies · 14 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000–2023As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2015As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2002–2022As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2002–2003As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2021–2022As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2009–2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2002As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | all samples, five arsenic-prone areas of Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | all samples, five arsenic-prone areas of Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | all samples, five arsenic-prone areas of Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | all samples, five arsenic-prone areas of Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | all samples, five arsenic-prone areas of Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Chandpur arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Chandpur arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Chandpur arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Chandpur arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Chandpur arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Faridpur arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Faridpur arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Faridpur arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Faridpur arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Faridpur arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Jessore arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Jessore arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Jessore arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Jessore arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Jessore arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Madaripur arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Madaripur arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Madaripur arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Madaripur arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Madaripur arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Satkhira arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Satkhira arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Satkhira arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Satkhira arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2017 | Satkhira arsenic-prone area, Bangladesh2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2021 | chicken, Zhejiang2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIslam et al. 2015 | Bogra district, all samples2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Meat and meat products group, Region of Valencia TDS 2010-20112010–2011As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 3.9 µg/kg (minimum); 25.5 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Meat and meat products group, Region of Valencia TDS 2010-20112010–2011As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Meat and meat products group, Region of Valencia TDS 2010-20112010–2011As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | all five cities2017As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 1.4 µg/kg (minimum); 4,070 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | all five cities2017As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | all five cities2017As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | all five cities2017As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Chennai2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Coimbatore2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Madurai2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Salem2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Trichy2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldNachman et al. 2013 | all raw samples, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldNachman et al. 2013 | paired raw/cooked breast halves2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 142 µg/kg (minimum); 419 µg/kg (maximum); 250 µg/kg (percentile); 320 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldCosmas et al. 2024 | Farm ACollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldCosmas et al. 2024 | Farm BCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldCosmas et al. 2024 | Farm CCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldCosmas et al. 2024 | Farm DCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldEdet et al. 2024 | commercial poultry farm, Abak, Akwa Ibom State2022Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | chicken burger from Saudi-produced brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | fresh chilled carcasses, three Saudi brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLiang et al. 2019 | Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahbub et al. 2018 | Broiler, 7 samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahbub et al. 2018 | Cockerel, 3 samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahbub et al. 2018 | Spent hen, 4 samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand ACollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand ACollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand BCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand BCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand CCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand CCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand ECollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand ECollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 6_362014–2015 | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldEFSA 2021 | EU occurrence data (LB)2013–2018 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldEFSA 2021 | EU occurrence data (UB)2013–2018 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | conventional factory feed, cage housing (2nd control group)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | conventional factory feed, cage housing (2nd control group)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | conventional factory feed, floor housing (1st control group)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | conventional factory feed, floor housing (1st control group)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | eco-feedCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | eco-feedCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | eco-feedCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | eco-feedCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldTodorovska et al. 2023 | fresh meat, unit 1 (different manufacturer or supplier)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldTodorovska et al. 2023 | fresh meat, unit 2 (different manufacturer or supplier)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldTodorovska et al. 2023 | fresh meat, unit 3 (different manufacturer or supplier)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
26 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | All, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Antibiotic-free2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Atlanta, GA, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Austin, TX, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Baltimore, MD, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Conventional2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Conventional producer with prohibitory arsenical policy2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Denver, CO, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Fayetteville, AR, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Flagstaff, AZ, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Los Angeles, CA, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | New York, NY, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Organic2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | paired raw/cooked breast halves2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Producer with no known arsenical policy2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Roxarsone detected, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Roxarsone not detected, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | San Francisco, CA, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Seattle, WA, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
10 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | all broiler meat, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | frozen imported carcasses (Brazil, France, USA), Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | Brazilian originCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | Brazilian originCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | local company A (Erbil)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | local company A (Erbil)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | local company B (Erbil)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | local company B (Erbil)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | Turkish originCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | Turkish originCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
2 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Philippines, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedMorshdy et al. 2023 | all samples (Sharkia Governorate retail)2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
10 findings · 6 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2022As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2012As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2022As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Meat and meat products group, Region of Valencia TDS 2010-20112010–2011As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 1.3 µg/kg (minimum); 3.7 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Meat and meat products group, Region of Valencia TDS 2010-20112010–2011As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Meat and meat products group, Region of Valencia TDS 2010-20112010–2011As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldNachman et al. 2013 | all raw samples, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldNachman et al. 2013 | paired raw/cooked breast halves2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 6_362014–2015 | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012 | all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 | European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013 | mean. | ||
19 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | All, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Antibiotic-free2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Atlanta, GA, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Austin, TX, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Baltimore, MD, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Conventional2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Conventional producer with prohibitory arsenical policy2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Denver, CO, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Fayetteville, AR, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Flagstaff, AZ, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Los Angeles, CA, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | New York, NY, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Organic2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | paired raw/cooked breast halves2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Producer with no known arsenical policy2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Roxarsone detected, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Roxarsone not detected, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | San Francisco, CA, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Seattle, WA, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
4 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2022As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldNachman et al. 2013 | all raw samples, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldNachman et al. 2013 | paired raw/cooked breast halves2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
19 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | All, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Antibiotic-free2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Atlanta, GA, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Austin, TX, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Baltimore, MD, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Conventional2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Conventional producer with prohibitory arsenical policy2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Denver, CO, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Fayetteville, AR, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Flagstaff, AZ, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Los Angeles, CA, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | New York, NY, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Organic2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | paired raw/cooked breast halves2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Producer with no known arsenical policy2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Roxarsone detected, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Roxarsone not detected, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | San Francisco, CA, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Seattle, WA, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
55 findings · 13 studies · 7 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2009As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2001–2002As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2005As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2002As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2021 | chicken, Zhejiang2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDabeka et al. 2003 | Ottawa composite (retail Oct-Nov 2000)1998–2000As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDabeka et al. 2003 | Whitehorse composite (retail Jan-Feb 1998)1998–2000As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKurniawati et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | all five cities2017As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 1,780 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | all five cities2017As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | all five cities2017As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | all five cities2017As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Chennai2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Coimbatore2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Madurai2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Salem2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMathaiyan et al. 2021 | live chicken slaughter shops, Trichy2017As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldEdet et al. 2024 | commercial poultry farm, Abak, Akwa Ibom State2022Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLiang et al. 2019 | Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 6_362014–2015 | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 30 µg/kg (percentile); 20 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | conventional factory feed, cage housing (2nd control group)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | conventional factory feed, cage housing (2nd control group)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | conventional factory feed, floor housing (1st control group)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | conventional factory feed, floor housing (1st control group)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | eco-feedCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | eco-feedCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | eco-feedCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLysenko et al. 2021 | eco-feedCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
9 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedDabeka et al. 2003 | Ottawa composite (retail Oct-Nov 2000)1998–2000As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, cookedDabeka et al. 2003 | Whitehorse composite (retail Jan-Feb 1998)1998–2000As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, cookedJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, cannedMorshdy et al. 2023 | all samples (Sharkia Governorate retail)2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011 | not detected. | ||
56 findings · 15 studies · 20 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2021 | chicken, Zhejiang2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | Poultry2022As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | Sonali Chicken2022As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | Sonali Chicken2022As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIslam et al. 2015 | Bogra district, all samples2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Ado-Ekiti markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 40 µg/kg (minimum); 131 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Ado-Ekiti markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Ado-Ekiti markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Akure markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 91 µg/kg (minimum); 113 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Akure markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Akure markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Benin City markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 1,110 µg/kg (minimum); 1,680 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Benin City markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Benin City markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Warri markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 1,890 µg/kg (minimum); 2,070 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Warri markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Warri markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Brazil2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Iran2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Saudi Arabia (printed 'Sudian')2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Turkey2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | Iraqi farm-bred chicken (local)2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | Iraqi house-bred chicken (local)2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldEdet et al. 2024 | commercial poultry farm, Abak, Akwa Ibom State2022Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | chicken burger from Saudi-produced brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | fresh chilled carcasses, three Saudi brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 6_362014–2015 | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 20 µg/kg (percentile); 60 µg/kg (percentile); 10 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 20 µg/kg (percentile); 40 µg/kg (percentile); 10 µg/kg (percentile); 30 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 20 µg/kg (percentile); 100 µg/kg (percentile); 70 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 3 g cumin/kg (T2)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 3 g cumin/kg (T2)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 6 g cumin/kg (T3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 6 g cumin/kg (T3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 9 g cumin/kg (T4)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 9 g cumin/kg (T4)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet without cumin (T1 control)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet without cumin (T1 control)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOkolo et al. 2022 | fresh drumstick, poultry farms around UmuahiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOkolo et al. 2022 | frozen drumstick, grocery shops, UmuahiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
4 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | all broiler meat, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | frozen imported carcasses (Brazil, France, USA), Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Italy, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Philippines, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Poland, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
99 findings · 25 studies · 27 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2021 | chicken, Zhejiang2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | Poultry2022As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | Sonali Chicken2022As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | Sonali Chicken2022As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (overall mean)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (overall mean)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Gabtoli market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Gabtoli market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Karwan Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Karwan Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Madhya Badda market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Madhya Badda market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Mohammadpur Town Hall Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Mohammadpur Town Hall Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Rayer Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Rayer Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Uttara market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Uttara market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIslam et al. 2015 | Bogra district, all samples2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKurniawati et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLoutfy et al. 2012 | Ismailia city markets, pooled samples2007As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Meat and meat products group, Region of Valencia TDS 2010-20112010–2011As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 52.5 µg/kg (minimum); 116 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Meat and meat products group, Region of Valencia TDS 2010-20112010–2011As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Meat and meat products group, Region of Valencia TDS 2010-20112010–2011As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Ado-Ekiti markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 2 µg/kg (minimum); 293 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Ado-Ekiti markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Ado-Ekiti markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Akure markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 1 µg/kg (minimum); 5 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Akure markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Akure markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Benin City markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 34 µg/kg (minimum); 45 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Benin City markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Benin City markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Warri markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 56 µg/kg (minimum); 89 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Warri markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Warri markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 524 µg/kg (minimum); 1,090 µg/kg (maximum); 670 µg/kg (percentile); 890 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Brazil2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Iran2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Saudi Arabia (printed 'Sudian')2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Turkey2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | Iraqi farm-bred chicken (local)2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | Iraqi house-bred chicken (local)2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldEdet et al. 2024 | commercial poultry farm, Abak, Akwa Ibom State2022Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 780 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldEdet et al. 2024 | commercial poultry farm, Abak, Akwa Ibom State2022Dry weight | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldEdet et al. 2024 | commercial poultry farm, Abak, Akwa Ibom State2022Dry weight | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | chicken burger from Saudi-produced brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | fresh chilled carcasses, three Saudi brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLiang et al. 2019 | Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahbub et al. 2018 | Broiler, 7 samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahbub et al. 2018 | Cockerel, 3 samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahbub et al. 2018 | Spent hen, 4 samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahbub et al. 2018 | Spent hen, 4 samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMorshed et al. 2024 | feed group C0 (control)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMorshed et al. 2024 | feed group C1 (feed spiked at 1.77 mg/kg Cr)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMorshed et al. 2024 | feed group C2 (feed spiked at 2.29 mg/kg Cr)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMorshed et al. 2024 | feed group C3 (feed spiked at 2.96 mg/kg Cr)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRokanuzzaman et al. 2022 | all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRokanuzzaman et al. 2022 | all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRokanuzzaman et al. 2022 | all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 6_362014–2015 | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 150 µg/kg (percentile); 320 µg/kg (percentile); 120 µg/kg (percentile); 310 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 300 µg/kg (percentile); 320 µg/kg (percentile); 290 µg/kg (percentile); 310 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 110 µg/kg (percentile); 270 µg/kg (percentile); 100 µg/kg (percentile); 160 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJamil et al. 2015 | Lahore markets (5 markets pooled)2013 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJamil et al. 2015 | Lahore markets (5 markets pooled)2013 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 3 g cumin/kg (T2)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 3 g cumin/kg (T2)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 6 g cumin/kg (T3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 6 g cumin/kg (T3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 9 g cumin/kg (T4)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 9 g cumin/kg (T4)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet without cumin (T1 control)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet without cumin (T1 control)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOkolo et al. 2022 | fresh drumstick, poultry farms around UmuahiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOkolo et al. 2022 | frozen drumstick, grocery shops, UmuahiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldSaraiva et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
7 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
3 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | all broiler meat, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | frozen imported carcasses (Brazil, France, USA), Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenAltalib et al. 2025 | Chicken2025 | mean. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Italy, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Philippines, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Poland, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
5 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, powder or groundSafwan et al. 2023 | retail product 12020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, powder or groundSafwan et al. 2023 | retail product 22020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, powder or groundSafwan et al. 2023 | retail product 32020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, powder or groundSafwan et al. 2023 | retail product 42020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, powder or groundSafwan et al. 2023 | retail product 52020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, peeled or fleshJamil et al. 2015 | Lahore markets (5 markets pooled)2013 | mean. | ||
39 findings · 11 studies · 16 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2009As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDordevic et al. 2019 | highest value across foils/marinade variants: marinated, foil C2018As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 2,250 µg/kg (minimum); 25,500 µg/kg (maximum); 5,180 µg/kg (percentile); 12,900 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDordevic et al. 2019 | highest value across foils/marinade variants: marinated, foil C2018Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldEdet et al. 2024 | commercial poultry farm, Abak, Akwa Ibom State2022Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | chicken burger from Saudi-produced brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | fresh chilled carcasses, three Saudi brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 6_362014–2015 | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 1,280 µg/kg (percentile); 3,610 µg/kg (percentile); 900 µg/kg (percentile); 3,170 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 1,320 µg/kg (percentile); 1,710 µg/kg (percentile); 910 µg/kg (percentile); 1,210 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 1,240 µg/kg (percentile); 5,130 µg/kg (percentile); 1,140 µg/kg (percentile); 5,410 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, cookedJayanthi et al. 2019 | central Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedJayanthi et al. 2019 | northern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedJayanthi et al. 2019 | southern Chennai (street food outlets)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | all broiler meat, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | frozen imported carcasses (Brazil, France, USA), Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
4 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Italy, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Philippines, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Poland, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedMorshdy et al. 2023 | all samples (Sharkia Governorate retail)2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
17 findings · 5 studies · 11 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2009As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000–2002As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Meat and meat products group, Region of Valencia TDS 2010-20112010–2011As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 2.6 µg/kg (minimum); 39.7 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Meat and meat products group, Region of Valencia TDS 2010-20112010–2011As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Meat and meat products group, Region of Valencia TDS 2010-20112010–2011As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 6_362014–2015 | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011 | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (percentile); 20 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (percentile); 30 µg/kg (percentile); 20 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
4 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Italy, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Philippines, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Poland, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedMorshdy et al. 2023 | all samples (Sharkia Governorate retail)2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
4 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 6_362014–2015 | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011 | not detected. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
4 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
36 findings · 7 studies · 5 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldKurniawati et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldZheng et al. 2025 | single composite of nine retail packages, Zhejiang2024As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldEdet et al. 2024 | commercial poultry farm, Abak, Akwa Ibom State2022Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | chicken burger from Saudi-produced brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | fresh chilled carcasses, three Saudi brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | all broiler meat, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | frozen imported carcasses (Brazil, France, USA), Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
105 findings · 23 studies · 30 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldauthors 2021 | chicken, Zhejiang2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | Poultry2022As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | Sonali Chicken2022As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | Sonali Chicken2022As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (overall mean)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (overall mean)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Gabtoli market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Gabtoli market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Karwan Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Karwan Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Madhya Badda market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Madhya Badda market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Mohammadpur Town Hall Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Mohammadpur Town Hall Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Rayer Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Rayer Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Uttara market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Uttara market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIslam et al. 2015 | Bogra district, all samples2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamouh et al. 2024 | breast from butcher shops/slaughterhousesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 750 µg/kg (minimum); 2,630 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamouh et al. 2024 | breast from butcher shops/slaughterhousesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamouh et al. 2024 | breast from butcher shops/slaughterhousesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamouh et al. 2024 | thigh from butcher shops/slaughterhousesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 810 µg/kg (minimum); 2,970 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamouh et al. 2024 | thigh from butcher shops/slaughterhousesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamouh et al. 2024 | thigh from butcher shops/slaughterhousesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLoutfy et al. 2012 | Ismailia city markets, pooled samples2007As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Meat and meat products group, Region of Valencia TDS 2010-20112010–2011As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 266 µg/kg (minimum); 538 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Meat and meat products group, Region of Valencia TDS 2010-20112010–2011As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMarín et al. 2018 | Meat and meat products group, Region of Valencia TDS 2010-20112010–2011As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Ado-Ekiti markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 53 µg/kg (minimum); 110 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Ado-Ekiti markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Ado-Ekiti markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Akure markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 11 µg/kg (minimum); 104 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Akure markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Akure markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Benin City markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 86 µg/kg (minimum); 209 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Benin City markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Benin City markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Warri markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 152 µg/kg (minimum); 213 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Warri markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Warri markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 943 µg/kg (minimum); 2,320 µg/kg (maximum); 1,220 µg/kg (percentile); 1,460 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Brazil2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Iran2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Saudi Arabia (printed 'Sudian')2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Turkey2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | Iraqi farm-bred chicken (local)2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | Iraqi house-bred chicken (local)2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldFaraj et al. 2023 | BazyanCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldFaraj et al. 2023 | DukanCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldFaraj et al. 2023 | MergapanCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldFaraj et al. 2023 | TanjaroCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | chicken burger from Saudi-produced brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | fresh chilled carcasses, three Saudi brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRokanuzzaman et al. 2022 | all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRokanuzzaman et al. 2022 | all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRokanuzzaman et al. 2022 | all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Abai district, Abai region (formerly the East Kazakhstan region)2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Abai district, Karaganda region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Akkol district, Akmola region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Aksuat district, Abai region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Aktogay district, Karaganda region2024–2025 | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Ayagoz district, Abai region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Bukhar-Zhyrau district, Karaganda region2024–2025 | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Bulandy district, Akmola region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Zerenda district, Akmola region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 420 µg/kg (percentile); 1,080 µg/kg (percentile); 490 µg/kg (percentile); 2,110 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 360 µg/kg (percentile); 430 µg/kg (percentile); 490 µg/kg (percentile); 570 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 490 µg/kg (percentile); 1,390 µg/kg (percentile); 720 µg/kg (percentile); 2,570 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJamil et al. 2015 | Lahore markets (5 markets pooled)2013 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldJamil et al. 2015 | Lahore markets (5 markets pooled)2013 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 3 g cumin/kg (T2)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 3 g cumin/kg (T2)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 6 g cumin/kg (T3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 6 g cumin/kg (T3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 9 g cumin/kg (T4)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 9 g cumin/kg (T4)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet without cumin (T1 control)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet without cumin (T1 control)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOkolo et al. 2022 | fresh drumstick, poultry farms around UmuahiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOkolo et al. 2022 | frozen drumstick, grocery shops, UmuahiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | control group, main diet (Table 6)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | control group, main diet (Table 6)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | experimental groupCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | experimental groupCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | household-kept hens, tissue content (Table 3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | household-kept hens, tissue content (Table 3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | household-kept hens, tissue content (Table 3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldTodorovska et al. 2023 | fresh meat, unit 1 (different manufacturer or supplier)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldTodorovska et al. 2023 | fresh meat, unit 2 (different manufacturer or supplier)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldTodorovska et al. 2023 | fresh meat, unit 3 (different manufacturer or supplier)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
11 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | all broiler meat, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | frozen imported carcasses (Brazil, France, USA), Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenAltalib et al. 2025 | Chicken2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | Brazilian originCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | Brazilian originCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | local company A (Erbil)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | local company A (Erbil)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | local company B (Erbil)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | local company B (Erbil)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | Turkish originCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenBazzaz et al. 2023 | Turkish originCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Italy, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Philippines, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Poland, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, peeled or fleshJamil et al. 2015 | Lahore markets (5 markets pooled)2013 | mean. | ||
68 findings · 11 studies · 16 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | Poultry2022As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | Sonali Chicken2022As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldChowdhury et al. 2024 | Sonali Chicken2022As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (overall mean)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (overall mean)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Gabtoli market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Gabtoli market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Karwan Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Karwan Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Madhya Badda market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Madhya Badda market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Mohammadpur Town Hall Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Mohammadpur Town Hall Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Rayer Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Rayer Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Uttara market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Uttara market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 15,600 µg/kg (minimum); 44,500 µg/kg (maximum); 20,800 µg/kg (percentile); 27,300 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Brazil2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Iran2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Saudi Arabia (printed 'Sudian')2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Turkey2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | Iraqi farm-bred chicken (local)2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | Iraqi house-bred chicken (local)2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | chicken burger from Saudi-produced brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | fresh chilled carcasses, three Saudi brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRokanuzzaman et al. 2022 | all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRokanuzzaman et al. 2022 | all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRokanuzzaman et al. 2022 | all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 14,300 µg/kg (percentile); 35,000 µg/kg (percentile); 13,000 µg/kg (percentile); 36,800 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 13,800 µg/kg (percentile); 26,300 µg/kg (percentile); 12,800 µg/kg (percentile); 17,300 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 17,200 µg/kg (percentile); 28,000 µg/kg (percentile); 14,300 µg/kg (percentile); 42,800 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 3 g cumin/kg (T2)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 3 g cumin/kg (T2)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 6 g cumin/kg (T3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 6 g cumin/kg (T3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 9 g cumin/kg (T4)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 9 g cumin/kg (T4)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet without cumin (T1 control)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet without cumin (T1 control)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | all broiler meat, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | frozen imported carcasses (Brazil, France, USA), Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | mean. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Italy, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Philippines, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Poland, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
31 findings · 9 studies · 26 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Ado-Ekiti markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 22 µg/kg (minimum); 102 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Ado-Ekiti markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Ado-Ekiti markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Akure markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 100 µg/kg (minimum); 210 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Akure markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Akure markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Benin City markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 98 µg/kg (minimum); 167 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Benin City markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Benin City markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Warri markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 1,090 µg/kg (minimum); 1,680 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Warri markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Warri markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 1,530 µg/kg (minimum); 6,470 µg/kg (maximum); 2,600 µg/kg (percentile); 4,540 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Brazil2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Iran2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Saudi Arabia (printed 'Sudian')2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Turkey2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | Iraqi farm-bred chicken (local)2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | Iraqi house-bred chicken (local)2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldEdet et al. 2024 | commercial poultry farm, Abak, Akwa Ibom State2022Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 450 µg/kg (minimum); 670 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldEdet et al. 2024 | commercial poultry farm, Abak, Akwa Ibom State2022Dry weight | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldEdet et al. 2024 | commercial poultry farm, Abak, Akwa Ibom State2022Dry weight | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | chicken burger from Saudi-produced brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | fresh chilled carcasses, three Saudi brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 170 µg/kg (percentile); 570 µg/kg (percentile); 180 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 160 µg/kg (percentile); 190 µg/kg (percentile); 180 µg/kg (percentile); 200 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 280 µg/kg (percentile); 610 µg/kg (percentile); 330 µg/kg (percentile); 680 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOkolo et al. 2022 | fresh drumstick, poultry farms around UmuahiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOkolo et al. 2022 | frozen drumstick, grocery shops, UmuahiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | all broiler meat, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | frozen imported carcasses (Brazil, France, USA), Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Italy, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Philippines, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Poland, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
5 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, powder or groundSafwan et al. 2023 | retail product 12020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, powder or groundSafwan et al. 2023 | retail product 22020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, powder or groundSafwan et al. 2023 | retail product 32020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, powder or groundSafwan et al. 2023 | retail product 42020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, powder or groundSafwan et al. 2023 | retail product 52020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
101 findings · 20 studies · 26 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (Min~Max across samples)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (overall mean)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | all six markets (overall mean)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Gabtoli market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Gabtoli market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Karwan Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Karwan Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Madhya Badda market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Madhya Badda market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Mohammadpur Town Hall Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Mohammadpur Town Hall Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Rayer Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Rayer Bazar market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Uttara market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHossain et al. 2023 | Uttara market, Dhaka North City CorporationCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKurniawati et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldLoutfy et al. 2012 | Ismailia city markets, pooled samples2007As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2021 | breastCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2021 | heartCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2021 | liverCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2021 | thighCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Ado-Ekiti markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 101 µg/kg (minimum); 123 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Ado-Ekiti markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Ado-Ekiti markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Akure markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 76 µg/kg (minimum); 102 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Akure markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Akure markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Benin City markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 1,020 µg/kg (minimum); 2,090 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Benin City markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Benin City markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Warri markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 1,910 µg/kg (minimum); 2,780 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Warri markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOgu et al. 2020 | Warri markets, raw muscle2017–2018As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 19,500 µg/kg (minimum); 43,300 µg/kg (maximum); 26,200 µg/kg (percentile); 30,700 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Subeihi 2022 | shops in Amman, Jordan2021Dry weight | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Brazil2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Iran2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Saudi Arabia (printed 'Sudian')2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | imported chicken, Turkey2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | Iraqi farm-bred chicken (local)2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAl-Sultany et al. 2024 | Iraqi house-bred chicken (local)2014–2015Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldEdet et al. 2024 | commercial poultry farm, Abak, Akwa Ibom State2022Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 3,450 µg/kg (minimum); 5,560 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldEdet et al. 2024 | commercial poultry farm, Abak, Akwa Ibom State2022Dry weight | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldEdet et al. 2024 | commercial poultry farm, Abak, Akwa Ibom State2022Dry weight | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldIgwemmar et al. 2022 | Poultry (farm-raised) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, AbujaCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | chicken burger from Saudi-produced brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | fresh chilled carcasses, three Saudi brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRokanuzzaman et al. 2022 | all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRokanuzzaman et al. 2022 | all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRokanuzzaman et al. 2022 | all samplesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Abai district, Abai region (formerly the East Kazakhstan region)2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Abai district, Karaganda region2024–2025 | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Akkol district, Akmola region2024–2025 | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Aksuat district, Abai region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Aktogay district, Karaganda region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Ayagoz district, Abai region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Bukhar-Zhyrau district, Karaganda region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Bulandy district, Akmola region2024–2025 | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAdilbekov et al. 2026 | Zerenda district, Akmola region2024–2025 | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 9,020 µg/kg (percentile); 24,600 µg/kg (percentile); 17,000 µg/kg (percentile); 53,500 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 8,840 µg/kg (percentile); 14,200 µg/kg (percentile); 17,400 µg/kg (percentile); 18,300 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 9,440 µg/kg (percentile); 27,000 µg/kg (percentile); 14,900 µg/kg (percentile); 57,900 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 3 g cumin/kg (T2)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 3 g cumin/kg (T2)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 6 g cumin/kg (T3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 6 g cumin/kg (T3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 9 g cumin/kg (T4)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet + 9 g cumin/kg (T4)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet without cumin (T1 control)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2020 | basal diet without cumin (T1 control)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOkolo et al. 2022 | fresh drumstick, poultry farms around UmuahiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldOkolo et al. 2022 | frozen drumstick, grocery shops, UmuahiaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldPappuswamy et al. 2021 | all three districts (range for this study)Collection date unreported | range. | ||
| Chicken, as soldPappuswamy et al. 2021 | local chickens, central market, Coimbatore district, Tamil NaduCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldPappuswamy et al. 2021 | local chickens, central market, Erode district, Tamil NaduCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldPappuswamy et al. 2021 | local chickens, central market, Namakkal district, Tamil NaduCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | control group, main diet (Table 6)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | control group, main diet (Table 6)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | experimental groupCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | experimental groupCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | household-kept hens, tissue content (Table 3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | household-kept hens, tissue content (Table 3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | household-kept hens, tissue content (Table 3)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldTodorovska et al. 2023 | fresh meat, unit 1 (different manufacturer or supplier)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldTodorovska et al. 2023 | fresh meat, unit 2 (different manufacturer or supplier)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldTodorovska et al. 2023 | fresh meat, unit 3 (different manufacturer or supplier)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | all broiler meat, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | frozen imported carcasses (Brazil, France, USA), Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | mean. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Italy, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Philippines, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, cannedLitrenta et al. 2025 | retail ready-to-eat product, origin Poland, packaging can2024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
9 findings · 3 studies · 12 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011 | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (percentile); 20 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (percentile); 20 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (percentile); 20 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
22 findings · 4 studies · 12 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | chicken burger from Saudi-produced brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | fresh chilled carcasses, three Saudi brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 150 µg/kg (percentile); 400 µg/kg (percentile); 180 µg/kg (percentile); 480 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 140 µg/kg (percentile); 160 µg/kg (percentile); 170 µg/kg (percentile); 190 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 240 µg/kg (percentile); 450 µg/kg (percentile); 220 µg/kg (percentile); 520 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | all broiler meat, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | frozen imported carcasses (Brazil, France, USA), Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
6 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2021 | breastCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2021 | heartCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2021 | liverCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMajid et al. 2021 | thighCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
4 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand ACollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand ACollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand BCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand BCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
8 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand ACollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand ACollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand BCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand BCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand CCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand CCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand ECollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand ECollection date unreported | mean. | ||
8 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand ACollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand ACollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand BCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand BCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand CCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand CCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand ECollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand ECollection date unreported | mean. | ||
8 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand ACollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand ACollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand BCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand BCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand CCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand CCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand ECollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldAlvarez et al. 2026 | retail brand ECollection date unreported | mean. | ||
8 findings · 2 studies · 12 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | chicken burger from Saudi-produced brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKorish et al. 2020 | fresh chilled carcasses, three Saudi brands, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 130 µg/kg (percentile); 330 µg/kg (percentile); 110 µg/kg (percentile); 270 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 130 µg/kg (percentile); 170 µg/kg (percentile); 120 µg/kg (percentile); 150 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 140 µg/kg (percentile); 550 µg/kg (percentile); 170 µg/kg (percentile); 660 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | all broiler meat, Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, frozenKorish et al. 2020 | frozen imported carcasses (Brazil, France, USA), Jeddah retail2017Dry weight | not detected. | ||
15 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 6_362014–2015 | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
12 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 1 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 3 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 4 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 5 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldKamaly et al. 2023 | poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
6 findings · 1 study · 12 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 50,000 µg/kg (percentile); 160,000 µg/kg (percentile); 180,000 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 50,000 µg/kg (percentile); 60,000 µg/kg (percentile); 40,000 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 70,000 µg/kg (percentile); 210,000 µg/kg (percentile); 220,000 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, as soldSaraiva et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
11 findings · 1 study · 22 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Arm (all samples)Collection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 370 µg/kg (minimum); 200 µg/kg (minimum); 415 µg/kg (maximum); 270 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Arm (all samples)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Arm (all samples)Collection date unreported | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Arm (all samples)Collection date unreported | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Arm (all samples)Collection date unreported | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Arm (all samples)Collection date unreported | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Chest cage (all samples)Collection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 267 µg/kg (minimum); 370 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Chest cage (all samples)Collection date unreported | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Chest cage (all samples)Collection date unreported | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Gizzard (all samples)Collection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 800 µg/kg (minimum); 1,070 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Gizzard (all samples)Collection date unreported | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Gizzard (all samples)Collection date unreported | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Head (all samples)Collection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 1,370 µg/kg (minimum); 1,500 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Head (all samples)Collection date unreported | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Head (all samples)Collection date unreported | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Heart (all samples)Collection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 300 µg/kg (minimum); 2,670 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Heart (all samples)Collection date unreported | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Heart (all samples)Collection date unreported | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Leg (all samples)Collection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 369 µg/kg (minimum); 1,200 µg/kg (minimum); 377 µg/kg (maximum); 1,330 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Leg (all samples)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Leg (all samples)Collection date unreported | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Leg (all samples)Collection date unreported | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Leg (all samples)Collection date unreported | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Leg (all samples)Collection date unreported | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Neck (all samples)Collection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 300 µg/kg (minimum); 330 µg/kg (minimum); 476 µg/kg (maximum); 600 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Neck (all samples)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Neck (all samples)Collection date unreported | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Neck (all samples)Collection date unreported | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Neck (all samples)Collection date unreported | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Neck (all samples)Collection date unreported | max. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Sternum (all samples)Collection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 670 µg/kg (minimum); 800 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Sternum (all samples)Collection date unreported | min. | ||
| Chicken, as soldMahmud et al. 2011 | Sternum (all samples)Collection date unreported | max. | ||
6 findings · 1 study · 12 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 30 µg/kg (percentile); 290 µg/kg (percentile); 20 µg/kg (percentile); 130 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (percentile); 40 µg/kg (percentile); 20 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 160 µg/kg (percentile); 660 µg/kg (percentile); 120 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
6 findings · 1 study · 12 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 4,000,000 µg/kg (percentile); 7,370,000 µg/kg (percentile); 4,010,000 µg/kg (percentile); 9,340,000 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 3,790,000 µg/kg (percentile); 4,100,000 µg/kg (percentile); 3,810,000 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 6,220,000 µg/kg (percentile); 7,580,000 µg/kg (percentile); 6,110,000 µg/kg (percentile); 11,100,000 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
11 findings · 1 study · 7 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (percentile); 20 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
6 findings · 1 study · 12 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 320,000 µg/kg (percentile); 970,000 µg/kg (percentile); 290,000 µg/kg (percentile); 1,080,000 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 300,000 µg/kg (percentile); 330,000 µg/kg (percentile); 290,000 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 400,000 µg/kg (percentile); 1,050,000 µg/kg (percentile); 360,000 µg/kg (percentile); 1,170,000 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
3 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldZheng et al. 2025 | single composite of nine retail packages, Zhejiang2024As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
6 findings · 1 study · 12 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 490,000 µg/kg (percentile); 1,330,000 µg/kg (percentile); 690,000 µg/kg (percentile); 2,820,000 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 480,000 µg/kg (percentile); 500,000 µg/kg (percentile); 660,000 µg/kg (percentile); 710,000 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 830,000 µg/kg (percentile); 1,580,000 µg/kg (percentile); 840,000 µg/kg (percentile); 4,040,000 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
6 findings · 1 study · 12 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 2,310,000 µg/kg (percentile); 7,720,000 µg/kg (percentile); 2,090,000 µg/kg (percentile); 6,270,000 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 2,010,000 µg/kg (percentile); 2,350,000 µg/kg (percentile); 2,040,000 µg/kg (percentile); 2,100,000 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 3,170,000 µg/kg (percentile); 8,240,000 µg/kg (percentile); 2,910,000 µg/kg (percentile); 7,200,000 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, as soldNachman et al. 2013 | all raw samples, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, as soldNachman et al. 2013 | paired raw/cooked breast halves2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
19 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | All, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Antibiotic-free2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Atlanta, GA, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Austin, TX, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Baltimore, MD, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Conventional2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Conventional producer with prohibitory arsenical policy2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Denver, CO, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Fayetteville, AR, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Flagstaff, AZ, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Los Angeles, CA, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | New York, NY, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Organic2010–2011As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | paired raw/cooked breast halves2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Producer with no known arsenical policy2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Roxarsone detected, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Roxarsone not detected, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | San Francisco, CA, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Seattle, WA, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
6 findings · 1 study · 12 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 10,400 µg/kg (percentile); 27,000 µg/kg (percentile); 6,400 µg/kg (percentile); 29,700 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 22,600 µg/kg (percentile); 24,600 µg/kg (percentile); 24,800 µg/kg (percentile); 28,500 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 7,590 µg/kg (percentile); 13,700 µg/kg (percentile); 4,620 µg/kg (percentile); 10,000 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
8 findings · 2 studies · 12 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 50 µg/kg (percentile); 280 µg/kg (percentile); 40 µg/kg (percentile); 160 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | all broiler groups (36 groups, 9 experimental series), OrenburgCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 50 µg/kg (percentile); 60 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacillota + ACT F1(+) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median.Same samples: 60 µg/kg (percentile); 290 µg/kg (percentile); 50 µg/kg (percentile); 320 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Chicken, as soldDeryabin et al. 2024 | Bacteroidota-enriched F1(-) cecal microbiome groupCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
4 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | name-brand productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldHenríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | store-brand (private label) productsCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Chicken, as soldZheng et al. 2025 | single composite of nine retail packages, Zhejiang2024As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Chicken, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 6_362014–2015 | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, as soldNachman et al. 2013 | paired raw/cooked breast halves2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
19 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | All, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Antibiotic-free2010–2011As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Atlanta, GA, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Austin, TX, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Baltimore, MD, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Conventional2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Conventional producer with prohibitory arsenical policy2010–2011As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Denver, CO, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Fayetteville, AR, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Flagstaff, AZ, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Los Angeles, CA, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | New York, NY, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Organic2010–2011As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | paired raw/cooked breast halves2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Producer with no known arsenical policy2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Roxarsone detected, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | geometric mean. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Roxarsone not detected, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | San Francisco, CA, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Chicken, cookedNachman et al. 2013 | Seattle, WA, retail chicken, 10 US metropolitan areas2010–2011As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
Shared dataset methods and interpretation
Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.
HMI chicken Pb reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Pb reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤5.9 | 5.9–6.1 (bounded) | 6.1–10 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤5.9 | 5.9–6.1 (bounded) | 6.1–10 (bounded) |
79 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 77 | 50% |
| Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | 2 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-cd53d0642010:675a665028a7
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Pb reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Pb reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight. Chicken, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤5.06 | 31–36 (bounded) | 391 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤5.06 | 31–36 (bounded) | 391 |
10 reference units; 4 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Al-Subeihi 2022 | 1 | 25% |
| Al-Sultany et al. 2024 | 6 | 25% |
| Cosmas et al. 2024 | 1 | 25% |
| Mahbub et al. 2018 | 2 | 25% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
4 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-453e0c241d47:1973ba9549c0
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Pb reference · Chicken, as sold, basis not stated
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Pb reference · Chicken, as sold, basis not stated. Chicken, as sold; Basis not stated by the source, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤513 | ≤513 | ≤513 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤513 | ≤513 | ≤513 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a basis not stated by the source basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-5e6b444acbc7:d7837525b819
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Pb reference · Chicken, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Pb reference · Chicken, cooked. Chicken, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤4 | ≤4 | ≤4 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤4 | ≤4 | ≤4 |
109 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 108 | 50% |
| Spungen et al. 2024 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-d7011f990ec4:9c5dae306124
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Cd reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Cd reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | 11.9 | 20 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | 11.9 | 20 |
80 reference units; 4 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 76 | 25% |
| Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | 2 | 25% |
| Spungen et al. 2024 | 1 | 25% |
| Zheng et al. 2025 | 1 | 25% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
4 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-ba34919f8af9:1971320074cb
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Cd reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Cd reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight. Chicken, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤12 | 12–20 (bounded) | 316 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤12 | 12–20 (bounded) | 316 |
8 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Al-Subeihi 2022 | 1 | 33% |
| Al-Sultany et al. 2024 | 6 | 33% |
| Edet et al. 2024 | 1 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-8a8e0ee5f542:446a705da75b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Cd reference · Chicken, as sold, basis not stated
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Cd reference · Chicken, as sold, basis not stated. Chicken, as sold; Basis not stated by the source, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤7920 | ≤7920 | ≤7920 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤7920 | ≤7920 | ≤7920 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a basis not stated by the source basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-321caf561482:170b708359bf
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Cd reference · Chicken, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Cd reference · Chicken, cooked. Chicken, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | 1.95 | 4.1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | 2 | 4.1 |
108 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 108 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, cooked on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-f09b3f5c187b:fc5a3dd8c2c3
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken tAs reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken tAs reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤9.6 | 9.6–10 (bounded) | 25.1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤9.6 | 9.6–10 (bounded) | 25.1 |
58 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 56 | 50% |
| Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | 2 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-4ea30410991c:4496148d2262
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken tAs reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI chicken tAs reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight. Chicken, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤13 | 145–152 (bounded) | 290 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤13 | 145–152 (bounded) | 290 |
2 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Al-Subeihi 2022 | 1 | 50% |
| Edet et al. 2024 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-08fa9bbc2919:f2086ca26c13
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken tAs reference · Chicken, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI chicken tAs reference · Chicken, cooked. Chicken, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤3 | ≤3 | ≤3 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤3 | ≤3 | ≤3 |
108 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 108 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, cooked on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-df0776e70abc:bd9cf7355593
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken iAs reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken iAs reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤3 | ≤10 | 2–10 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤3 | ≤10 | 2–10 (bounded) |
7 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 7 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-25f19c7f198d:bd8119c7304b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken DMA reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken DMA reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-ce572806257f:d225f6024338
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken tHg reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken tHg reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.35 | 0.35–1.14 (bounded) | 10.7 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.35 | 0.35–1.14 (bounded) | 10.7 |
29 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 25 | 33% |
| Dabeka et al. 2003 | 2 | 33% |
| Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | 2 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-97e9995498ae:73c52bb670f2
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken tHg reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI chicken tHg reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight. Chicken, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤2 | ≤2 | ≤2 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤2 | ≤2 | ≤2 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Edet et al. 2024 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Edet et al. 2024 is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-1b75d260df5a:76b61bbee22c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken tHg reference · Chicken, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI chicken tHg reference · Chicken, cooked. Chicken, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.3 | 0.08–0.72 (bounded) | 0.3–1 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.3 | 0.08–0.72 (bounded) | 0.3–1 (bounded) |
110 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 108 | 50% |
| Dabeka et al. 2003 | 2 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-163ee9c96527:2c575d959bea
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Ni reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Ni reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 46.9 | 94.5 | 142 |
| Alternative weighting | 46.9 | 94.5 | 142 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-ff5d36957288:be46d9846340
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Ni reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Ni reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight. Chicken, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤50 | 3070–3090 (bounded) | 7000 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤50 | 3070–3090 (bounded) | 7000 |
7 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Al-Sultany et al. 2024 | 6 | 50% |
| Edet et al. 2024 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-797cc5e8b5bb:9eff9157e928
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Ni reference · Chicken, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Ni reference · Chicken, cooked. Chicken, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤40 | ≤40 | ≤40 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤40 | ≤40 | ≤40 |
108 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 108 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, cooked on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-e0d59887d0d9:d66b84f3e4b3
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Cr reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Cr reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 46.2 | 53 | 59.8 |
| Alternative weighting | 46.2 | 53 | 59.8 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-cbf35344e5d3:44aef36e0bdf
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Cr reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Cr reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight. Chicken, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤10 | 407 | 730 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤10 | 407 | 730 |
8 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Al-Subeihi 2022 | 1 | 33% |
| Al-Sultany et al. 2024 | 6 | 33% |
| Mahbub et al. 2018 | 1 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-3d6e98a38192:1b1e7ed2582a
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Cr reference · Chicken, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Cr reference · Chicken, cooked. Chicken, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
108 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 108 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, cooked on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-e1991381bb92:ec377b61535d
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Al reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Al reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤236 | 1350 | 2420 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤236 | 1350 | 2420 |
5 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 3 | 50% |
| Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | 2 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-f33a249f361b:dfdc66de8503
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Al reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Al reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight. Chicken, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤32 | 4120–4130 (bounded) | 8230 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤32 | 4120–4130 (bounded) | 8230 |
2 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Al-Subeihi 2022 | 1 | 50% |
| Edet et al. 2024 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-64e3b5c6e33e:8f668993fe72
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Sn reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Sn reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤10 | 10.3–11.4 (bounded) | 14.5 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤10 | 10.3–11.4 (bounded) | 14.5 |
6 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 6 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-3683a2299db3:478d5d799134
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Sb reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Sb reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 0.8 | 0.95 | 1.1 |
| Alternative weighting | 0.8 | 0.95 | 1.1 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-14985ae86359:c30632d3f90a
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken U reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken U reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 0.9 | 1.05 | 1.2 |
| Alternative weighting | 0.9 | 1.05 | 1.2 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-04f5c09a1379:a13dbcc598d6
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken U reference · Chicken, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI chicken U reference · Chicken, cooked. Chicken, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | ≤1 | 1.1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | ≤1 | 1.1 |
108 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 108 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, cooked on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-97ae529ff54f:c872451593e2
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Co reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Co reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Alternative weighting | 30 | 30 | 30 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Zheng et al. 2025 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Zheng et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-6e1e4f65ea84:0a302593eff8
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Co reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Co reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight. Chicken, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤130 | ≤130 | ≤130 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤130 | ≤130 | ≤130 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Edet et al. 2024 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Edet et al. 2024 is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-94d3f1684911:30269ac8039b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Cu reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Cu reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 623 | 814 | 1000 |
| Alternative weighting | 623 | 814 | 1000 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-43229406154a:06c8e843f4ec
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Cu reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Cu reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight. Chicken, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 405 | 1030 | 1350 |
| Alternative weighting | 405 | 1030 | 1350 |
7 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Al-Subeihi 2022 | 1 | 50% |
| Al-Sultany et al. 2024 | 6 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-ee33527b1d0d:cd9c3d68423d
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Fe reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Fe reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 6150 | 6550 | 6960 |
| Alternative weighting | 6150 | 6550 | 6960 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-ed7ae4e6f17e:b44771f1dc35
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Fe reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Fe reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight. Chicken, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 23300 | 47000 | 75200 |
| Alternative weighting | 23300 | 47000 | 75200 |
7 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Al-Subeihi 2022 | 1 | 50% |
| Al-Sultany et al. 2024 | 6 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-6dbab66fb015:5e47f1d5ead9
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Mn reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Mn reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1280 | 1640 | 2000 |
| Alternative weighting | 1280 | 1640 | 2000 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-4f7e207aecef:557fde49048c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Mn reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Mn reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight. Chicken, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 322 | 2200 | 3880 |
| Alternative weighting | 322 | 2200 | 3880 |
7 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Al-Subeihi 2022 | 1 | 50% |
| Al-Sultany et al. 2024 | 6 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-e2700052fdda:788ceaf60304
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Zn reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Zn reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 6570 | 7950 | 9330 |
| Alternative weighting | 6570 | 7950 | 9330 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-9590f7f031bc:de272d224773
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Zn reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Zn reference · Chicken, as sold, dry weight. Chicken, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 6390 | 18000 | 27800 |
| Alternative weighting | 6390 | 18000 | 27800 |
7 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Al-Subeihi 2022 | 1 | 50% |
| Al-Sultany et al. 2024 | 6 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-78e85f5b2429:2292f149aef4
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken V reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken V reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 4.8 | 5.4 | 6 |
| Alternative weighting | 4.8 | 5.4 | 6 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-79731243e8a2:b0703bffbf79
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Se reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Se reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 55.9 | 68.7 | 81.4 |
| Alternative weighting | 55.9 | 68.7 | 81.4 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-38dec4dab441:a7b01f8a12c8
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Ag reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Ag reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1.6 | 2.1 | 2.6 |
| Alternative weighting | 1.6 | 2.1 | 2.6 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-9032b0b01849:ae2c1730ff1d
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Ba reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Ba reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 612 | 633 | 654 |
| Alternative weighting | 612 | 633 | 654 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-126de5395e68:9ebb276deef0
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Mo reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Mo reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 113 | 287 | 440 |
| Alternative weighting | 113 | 287 | 440 |
3 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | 2 | 50% |
| Zheng et al. 2025 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-061c84f2d599:d4c613ba3852
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken REE_sum reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken REE_sum reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 6.2 | 9.15 | 12.1 |
| Alternative weighting | 6.2 | 9.15 | 12.1 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-99b388f4bbdc:8ab21f5d6077
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Sr reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Sr reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1550 | 1810 | 2070 |
| Alternative weighting | 1550 | 1810 | 2070 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 is the only compatible sampling family for chicken, as sold on this basis in the completed chicken ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-d45bb0d23194:f4514124f018
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI chicken Tl reference · Chicken, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI chicken Tl reference · Chicken, as sold. Chicken, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1.95 | 2 | 2.45 |
| Alternative weighting | 1.95 | 2 | 2.45 |
3 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Henríquez-Hernández et al. 2023 | 2 | 50% |
| Zheng et al. 2025 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for chicken, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:chicken-e6ed4a5de7f2:aabb8b395137
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
The source reports only a percentile, range or maximum for these samples, with no mean or median to place against the reference. Spread figures that do have a mean or median are shown on that row instead.
The value could not be reconciled with its own paper, so it is shown but not compared.
The result is below a reporting limit, and the range from zero to that limit crosses more than one band.
No medians or sample values exist for this form and metal, so no HMI reference could be built.
The HMI reference for this form has fewer than four units or no measurable spread, below the display minimum.
The result is on a basis (dry weight, or not stated) that no HMI reference for this form uses, so it cannot be placed.
Reporting limits overlap the study comparison, so no direction can be shown.
No findings match these filters. Change the selection or reset to show all source findings.
How metals reach chicken
The evidence on how metals reach chicken comes from studies that compared exposed and ordinary settings. Chicken, as sold from conventional factory feed, floor housing (1st control group) (experiment) had lead higher at 24.7 µg/kg, against 3.53 µg/kg for conventional factory feed, cage housing (2nd control group) in the same study.10Organic Meat Production of Broiler Chickens Hubbard Redbro CrossInternational Journal of Veterinary Science 10(1):62-68Read source → In another study, chicken, as sold from household-kept hens, tissue content (Table 3) (experiment) had Cu higher at 4,600 µg/kg, against 910 µg/kg for control group, main diet (Table 6) in the same study.22Effect of silicon and mineral extract on heavy metals balance and accumulation rate in the muscle tissue of poultryUkrainian Journal of Ecology 9(4):742-748Read source → A third study found that chicken, as sold from frozen drumstick, grocery shops, Umuahia had cadmium higher at 94 µg/kg, against 19 µg/kg for fresh drumstick, poultry farms around Umuahia in the same study.23Chemical and microbiological quality of commercial fresh and frozen chicken drumstick in Umuhia, NigeriaInternational Journal of Food, Agriculture, and Natural ResourcesRead source →
These are observational comparisons from single studies; the size of the difference depends on the site, metal and distance.
Which forms and regions measured lower
For cadmium, the HMI reference median was lowest for chicken, cooked (1.95 µg/kg) and highest for chicken, as sold (11.9 µg/kg); forms differ in water content, so this compares foods as sold or eaten, not uptake.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →6Concentration of Essential, Toxic, and Rare Earth Elements in Ready-to-Eat Baby Purees from the Spanish MarketNutrients 15(14):3251Read source →8Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →26Analysis of Elemental Concentrations and Risk Assessment of Prepared Livestock and Poultry Meat Dishes Sold in Zhejiang ProvinceFoods 2026, 15, 73 (published online 25 December 2025)Read source → The HMI reference for lead in chicken, as sold pools 10 subgroup units from 4 sampling families, with a median of between 31 and 36 µg/kg and a middle half spanning below 5.06 (lower quartile) and 391 µg/kg (upper quartile).13Human health risk assessment of some important trace elements in boneless whole chicken meatF1000Research 2022, 11:276 (version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations)Read source →27Determination of Heavy Metals Concentrations in Local and Imported Chicken Meat Found in Hilla Province MarketsAmerican Journal of Environment and Climate 3(2):45-50Read source →28An evaluation of the health risks, antibiotic residue levels and potentially toxic ingredients in Nigerian poultry productsInternational Journal of Agricultural InventionRead source →29Detection of heavy metals in poultry feed, meat and eggsAsian-Australasian Journal of Food Safety and SecurityRead source → For lead in chicken, cooked, the reference median was below 4 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 4 to below 4 µg/kg across 109 units.2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →8Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source → For lead in chicken, as sold, the reference median was between 5.9 and 6.1 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 5.9 to between 6.1 and 10 µg/kg across 79 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →6Concentration of Essential, Toxic, and Rare Earth Elements in Ready-to-Eat Baby Purees from the Spanish MarketNutrients 15(14):3251Read source →
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, chicken, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (7.3 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (448 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in EURO (1.31 µg/kg) and the highest in EMRO (24 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
In one study, lead across 12 groups of chicken ranged from 334 µg/kg (poultry brand 2 (retail brand category)) to 5,550 µg/kg (poultry brand 6 (retail brand category)); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.30Health risk assessment of metals in chicken meat and liver in EgyptEnvironmental Science and Pollution ResearchRead source → In another study, lead across 10 groups of chicken ranged from 11.5 µg/kg (live chicken slaughter shops, Coimbatore) to 1,960 µg/kg (live chicken slaughter shops, Chennai); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.9Assessment of Pb, Cd, As and Hg concentration in edible parts of broiler in major metropolitan cities of Tamil Nadu, IndiaToxicology Reports 8 (2021) 668-675Read source →
Processing, cooking and preparation
Processed or prepared forms were compared only with unprocessed chicken in the same study and group. Chicken, cooked (central Chennai (street food outlets)) had lead higher at 960 µg/kg, against 600 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (chicken, as sold).11Assessment of non-essential heavy metals in ready-to-eat chicken meat products of Chennai cityInternational Journal of Chemical StudiesRead source → In another study, chicken, peeled or flesh (Lahore markets (5 markets pooled)) had lead higher at 962 µg/kg, against 504 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (chicken, as sold).31Accumulation of Heavy Metals in Edible Organs of Different Meat Products Available in the Markets of Lahore, PakistanPakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research Series B: Biological Sciences 58(2):92-97Read source → A third study found that chicken, cooked (Ottawa composite (retail Oct-Nov 2000)) had total mercury higher at 0.44 µg/kg, against 0.35 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (chicken, as sold).32Survey of total mercury in total diet food composites and an estimation of the dietary intake of mercury by adults and children from two Canadian cities, 1998-2000Food Additives & ContaminantsRead source →
Forms differ in water content, so a per-kilogram difference is not by itself a measured removal or gain of metal.
Mitigation for chicken
Lot testing against the applicable limit is the check that can be verified.
No measured way to lower metals in this food is in the library yet.
Trade-offs and limits of controls
Avoiding exposed growing areas lowered the metal measured in the studies available, but no study measured the cost or supply effect of doing so.10Organic Meat Production of Broiler Chickens Hubbard Redbro CrossInternational Journal of Veterinary Science 10(1):62-68Read source → Metals do not move together, so a lot that passes a lead limit says little about cadmium, arsenic or nickel unless those are tested as well.
Testing chicken for metals
Results depend on the method and its reporting limit. Reporting limits for lead ranged from 0.12 µg/kg (Cosmas et al. 2024) to 25,000 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →28An evaluation of the health risks, antibiotic residue levels and potentially toxic ingredients in Nigerian poultry productsInternational Journal of Agricultural InventionRead source → Reporting limits for cadmium ranged from 0.67 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 15,800 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Reporting limits for total arsenic ranged from 0.4 µg/kg (Liang et al. 2019) to 1,000 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →19Analysis of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs and an Assessment of the Health Risks to the General Public via Consumption in Beijing, ChinaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthRead source →
A useful lot result names the form, the basis and a quantification limit well below the limit that applies.
Buying and verifying chicken
No maximum level for metals in chicken was verified from primary text for this page; buyers should confirm the limit that applies in the destination market.
Exposure from chicken
No source in the library converted chicken concentrations into a verified estimate of intake for a defined population. Concentrations describe the food, not individual risk.
Evidence review and remaining gaps
Every source record that names chicken was decided on its content: 61 occurrence extracted, 61 records in all. The occurrence table renders every extracted result; held values remain visible with their reason.
References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.
Chicken FAQs
What heavy metals are found in chicken?
The library reports lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, total mercury, methylmercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ag, As_extractable, As_nonextractable, AsIII, AsV, B, Ba, Be, Bi, Ca, CrIII, CrVI, I, K, Li, Mg, Mo, Na, P, REE_sum, Roxarsone, Si, Sr, Tl and Unknown As species in chicken, most often lead, cadmium and total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Keywords: Meat, Heavy metal, Toxic elements, Health risk, Exposure assessmentPeer-reviewed articleRead source →4Health effects of heavy metals in meat and poultry consumption in Noakhali, BangladeshToxicology Reports 12 (2024) 168-177Read source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in chicken, as sold from 7,752 results in 3 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 7.3 to 448 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
How do heavy metals get into chicken?
In the studies available, chicken from contaminated or exposed settings carried more metal than chicken from the same study’s control.7Content of Heavy Metals in Poultry and Local (Free Range) Chickens raised within Gwagwalada Area Council of Abuja, NigeriaCognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, Vol. 2, Issue 9, September 2022, pp. 43-57Read source → Chicken, as sold from Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, Abuja had lead higher at 3,450 µg/kg, against 1,400 µg/kg for Local (free-range) chicken, Gwagwalada Area Council, Abuja in the same study.7Content of Heavy Metals in Poultry and Local (Free Range) Chickens raised within Gwagwalada Area Council of Abuja, NigeriaCognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, Vol. 2, Issue 9, September 2022, pp. 43-57Read source →
Which types of chicken have the lowest levels?
For cadmium, the HMI reference median was lowest for chicken, cooked (1.95 µg/kg) and highest for chicken, as sold (11.9 µg/kg); forms differ in water content, so this compares foods as sold or eaten, not uptake.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →6Concentration of Essential, Toxic, and Rare Earth Elements in Ready-to-Eat Baby Purees from the Spanish MarketNutrients 15(14):3251Read source →8Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →26Analysis of Elemental Concentrations and Risk Assessment of Prepared Livestock and Poultry Meat Dishes Sold in Zhejiang ProvinceFoods 2026, 15, 73 (published online 25 December 2025)Read source →
Which regions report the lowest levels in chicken?
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, chicken, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (7.3 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (448 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in EURO (1.31 µg/kg) and the highest in EMRO (24 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Does processing change heavy metals in chicken?
Only comparisons between forms in the same study are available, not before-and-after measurements of the same chicken.11Assessment of non-essential heavy metals in ready-to-eat chicken meat products of Chennai cityInternational Journal of Chemical StudiesRead source → Chicken, cooked (central Chennai (street food outlets)) had lead higher at 960 µg/kg, against 600 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (chicken, as sold).11Assessment of non-essential heavy metals in ready-to-eat chicken meat products of Chennai cityInternational Journal of Chemical StudiesRead source →
How much of the arsenic in chicken is inorganic?
Inorganic arsenic, the more toxic form, was measured in 31 results from 6 sources, far fewer than total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →33Assessment of metal levels in foodstuffs from the Region of Valencia (Spain)Toxicology Reports 5 (2018) 654-670Read source →34Roxarsone, Inorganic Arsenic, and Other Arsenic Species in Chicken: A U.S.-Based Market Basket SampleEnvironmental Health Perspectives 121(7):818-824Read source →35Total Diet Study of metals and other elements in foodFood and Environment Research Agency report for the UK Food Standards Agency, Fera report 15/06, project FS102081Read source →36The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →37Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597Read source → Across 2 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported inorganic arsenic means and medians with the basis not stated ranged from 3 µg/kg (Centre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012) to 7.9 µg/kg (European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014).36The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →37Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597Read source →
References
Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.
- GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsDataset
- FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsDataset
- Keywords: Meat, Heavy metal, Toxic elements, Health risk, Exposure assessmentPeer-reviewed
- Health effects of heavy metals in meat and poultry consumption in Noakhali, BangladeshPeer-reviewed
- Influence of Cooking by Boiling on Lead and Cadmium in Meat and Liver of ChickensPeer-reviewed
- Concentration of Essential, Toxic, and Rare Earth Elements in Ready-to-Eat Baby Purees from the Spanish MarketPeer-reviewed
- Content of Heavy Metals in Poultry and Local (Free Range) Chickens raised within Gwagwalada Area Council of Abuja, NigeriaPeer-reviewed
- Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Peer-reviewed
- Assessment of Pb, Cd, As and Hg concentration in edible parts of broiler in major metropolitan cities of Tamil Nadu, IndiaPeer-reviewed
- Organic Meat Production of Broiler Chickens Hubbard Redbro CrossPeer-reviewed
- Assessment of non-essential heavy metals in ready-to-eat chicken meat products of Chennai cityPeer-reviewed
- Human health risk assessment of edible body parts of chicken through heavy metals and trace elements quantitative analysisPeer-reviewed
- Human health risk assessment of some important trace elements in boneless whole chicken meatPeer-reviewed
- Technogenic contamination of livestock- and fish-derived food products with heavy metals and radionuclides in industrial and post-nuclear regions of KazakhstanPeer-reviewed
- Carcinogens in Food: Evaluating the Presence of Cadmium, Lead, in Poultry Meat in South IndiaPeer-reviewed
- Assessment and health risk study of some heavy metals in instant soup and chicken stock products from Jordanian marketPeer-reviewed
- The Measurement of Cadmium, Zinc and Silver in Chicken Meat in Isfahan Province, IranPeer-reviewed
- HEALTH RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH HEAVY METALS IN COMMERCIAL CHICKEN MEAT VIA CONSUMPTION WITHIN SOUTHERN NIGERIAPeer-reviewed
- Analysis of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs and an Assessment of the Health Risks to the General Public via Consumption in Beijing, ChinaPeer-reviewed
- Risks assessment of toxic metals in canned meat and chickenPeer-reviewed
- Analysis and exposure assessment of some heavy metals in foodstuffs from Ismailia city, EgyptPeer-reviewed
- Effect of silicon and mineral extract on heavy metals balance and accumulation rate in the muscle tissue of poultryPeer-reviewed
- Chemical and microbiological quality of commercial fresh and frozen chicken drumstick in Umuhia, NigeriaPeer-reviewed
- Speciation of arsenic in chicken thigh and breast meat using solvent extraction and selective reduction HG-AASPeer-reviewed
- Estimation of Chromium (VI) in various body parts of Local ChickenPeer-reviewed
- Analysis of Elemental Concentrations and Risk Assessment of Prepared Livestock and Poultry Meat Dishes Sold in Zhejiang ProvincePeer-reviewed
- Determination of Heavy Metals Concentrations in Local and Imported Chicken Meat Found in Hilla Province MarketsPeer-reviewed
- An evaluation of the health risks, antibiotic residue levels and potentially toxic ingredients in Nigerian poultry productsPeer-reviewed
- Detection of heavy metals in poultry feed, meat and eggsPeer-reviewed
- Health risk assessment of metals in chicken meat and liver in EgyptPeer-reviewed
- Accumulation of Heavy Metals in Edible Organs of Different Meat Products Available in the Markets of Lahore, PakistanPeer-reviewed
- Survey of total mercury in total diet food composites and an estimation of the dietary intake of mercury by adults and children from two Canadian cities, 1998-2000Peer-reviewed
- Assessment of metal levels in foodstuffs from the Region of Valencia (Spain)Peer-reviewed
- Roxarsone, Inorganic Arsenic, and Other Arsenic Species in Chicken: A U.S.-Based Market Basket SamplePeer-reviewed
- Total Diet Study of metals and other elements in foodGovernment
- The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicGovernment
- Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationGovernment
Sources
Browse Chicken Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.
Update history
22 October 2026: Rebuilt from every chicken record in the library: 61 occurrence sources, references by form and basis, same-study contrasts.
