Celery in the HMI library has 233 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, arsenic (As) and Mo from 23 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Quantification and Reduction in Heavy Metal Residues in Some Fruits and Vegetables: A Case Study Galați County, RomaniaHorticulturaeRead source →4Risk of cadmium, lead and zinc exposure from consumption of vegetables produced in areas with mining and smelting pastScientific ReportsRead source →5Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →6HEAVY METALS ACCUMULATION IN SOIL AND CELERY ROOT (APIUM GRAVEOLENS L.) HARVESTED FROM THE POLLUTED AREAS IN SIBIU COUNTY, CENTRAL ROMANIAAnnals of the University of Craiova—Agriculture,Montanology,Cadastre52(1):422–429Read source →
-
Metals measured:
Lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury and nickel and others, in 233 results from 23 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Quantification and Reduction in Heavy Metal Residues in Some Fruits and Vegetables: A Case Study Galați County, RomaniaHorticulturaeRead source →4Risk of cadmium, lead and zinc exposure from consumption of vegetables produced in areas with mining and smelting pastScientific ReportsRead source →
-
Main drivers:
Celery, as sold from frozen product, Poland retail/official control had lead higher at 64 µg/kg, against 31 µg/kg for fresh product, Poland retail/official control in the same study.7Concentration of cadmium and lead in vegetables and fruitsScientific ReportsRead source →
-
Practical framing:
Ask for lot results with a quantification limit well below the limit that applies in the destination market.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Quantification and Reduction in Heavy Metal Residues in Some Fruits and Vegetables: A Case Study Galați County, RomaniaHorticulturaeRead source →4Risk of cadmium, lead and zinc exposure from consumption of vegetables produced in areas with mining and smelting pastScientific ReportsRead source →
Celery overview
Celery in the HMI library has 233 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, As and Mo from 23 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Quantification and Reduction in Heavy Metal Residues in Some Fruits and Vegetables: A Case Study Galați County, RomaniaHorticulturaeRead source →4Risk of cadmium, lead and zinc exposure from consumption of vegetables produced in areas with mining and smelting pastScientific ReportsRead source →5Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →6HEAVY METALS ACCUMULATION IN SOIL AND CELERY ROOT (APIUM GRAVEOLENS L.) HARVESTED FROM THE POLLUTED AREAS IN SIBIU COUNTY, CENTRAL ROMANIAAnnals of the University of Craiova—Agriculture,Montanology,Cadastre52(1):422–429Read source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in celery, as sold from 1,027 results in 4 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 3 to 620 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In the US Total Diet Study, celery, as sold had a median lead result below 4 µg/kg across 27 composites from 2017–2020.2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →
Across 2 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported lead means and medians on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis ranged from 6 µg/kg (Rusin et al. 2021) to 470 µg/kg (Guerra et al. 2012).5Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →7Concentration of cadmium and lead in vegetables and fruitsScientific ReportsRead source → For cadmium, 4 studies on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis reported means and medians from 16 µg/kg (Dearing et al. 2025) to 152 µg/kg (Rusin et al. 2021).7Concentration of cadmium and lead in vegetables and fruitsScientific ReportsRead source →8Assessment of Heavy Metals in Organic and Non-Organic Vegetables Post Severe Tropical Cyclone Gabrielle: A cross-sectional comparative analysisF1000ResearchRead source → Higher results came from contaminated or exposed settings rather than ordinary supply. Celery, as sold from fresh product, Poland retail/official control had cadmium higher at 152 µg/kg, against 44 µg/kg for frozen product, Poland retail/official control in the same study.7Concentration of cadmium and lead in vegetables and fruitsScientific ReportsRead source →
For a buyer the practical points are the form bought, the basis a result is reported on, where the celery came from and the laboratory’s reporting limit. Testing finds contamination but does not remove it.
What counts as celery
This page covers celery, as sold (233 results).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Quantification and Reduction in Heavy Metal Residues in Some Fruits and Vegetables: A Case Study Galați County, RomaniaHorticulturaeRead source →4Risk of cadmium, lead and zinc exposure from consumption of vegetables produced in areas with mining and smelting pastScientific ReportsRead source →5Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →6HEAVY METALS ACCUMULATION IN SOIL AND CELERY ROOT (APIUM GRAVEOLENS L.) HARVESTED FROM THE POLLUTED AREAS IN SIBIU COUNTY, CENTRAL ROMANIAAnnals of the University of Craiova—Agriculture,Montanology,Cadastre52(1):422–429Read source →
Results stay on the basis each source reports: as sold or fresh weight, dry weight, or unstated. Dry-weight, as-sold and unstated results are never pooled, and no moisture conversion is applied.
Heavy metal contamination profile of celery
The table holds every extracted celery result: one row for each statistic a source reports for a form, group and metal, 233 rows in all, grouped by metal and form; percentiles, ranges and maxima for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Quantification and Reduction in Heavy Metal Residues in Some Fruits and Vegetables: A Case Study Galați County, RomaniaHorticulturaeRead source →4Risk of cadmium, lead and zinc exposure from consumption of vegetables produced in areas with mining and smelting pastScientific ReportsRead source →5Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →6HEAVY METALS ACCUMULATION IN SOIL AND CELERY ROOT (APIUM GRAVEOLENS L.) HARVESTED FROM THE POLLUTED AREAS IN SIBIU COUNTY, CENTRAL ROMANIAAnnals of the University of Craiova—Agriculture,Montanology,Cadastre52(1):422–429Read source → Monitoring medians are HMI calculations from individual submissions; non-detects remain intervals between zero and the reporting limit and are never read as zero.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
47 rows can be rated against an HMI reference for the same form and basis, 6 rows have a direct same-study comparison, and the rest stay unrated with the reason recorded. 5 values from 2 sources failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.9Assessment of Heavy Metals Concentration and Health Risks of Selected Vegetables Sold In Jos MetropolisArchives of Medical Case Reports and Case Study 4(5)Read source →10Determination of some heavy metals and their potential risk in selected vegetables on sale within Kaduna Metropolis, Kaduna State, NigeriaWorld NutritionRead source →
Comparison methods and scope
Each row is one statistic a source reports for one form of celery, group and metal; percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Different forms and preparation states are kept apart, and dry-weight results never share a reference with as-sold or fresh-weight results. Ratings place a result against an HMI reference built from monitoring results and ordinary-setting medians for the same form and basis. Same-study contrasts compare a contaminated or treated site with its control, targeted with random sampling, a prepared form with the unprocessed one, or one group of a study with the median of its other groups. Held rows failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.
First displayed analyte: Lead: 61 findings from 15 sources. Each row retains its statistic and measurement basis.
Filter findings
194 of 194 findings · 19 analytes
About this table
| Food form | Collection scope | Finding (µg/kg) | Comparison | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
52 findings · 15 studies · 9 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2019 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2009–2023 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2018–2023 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2014 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015–2017 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2010 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2000–2017 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2012 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2019 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2018 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2004–2016 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2001–2008 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldBora et al. 2022 | amateur farmers; washed with tap water2021 | not detected. | ||
| Celery, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021 | not detected. | ||
| Celery, as soldĆwieląg-Drabek et al. 2020 | allotment gardens in four zones of Silesia Province near Zn-Pb2013–2017 | mean.Same samples: 1,770 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Celery, as soldĆwieląg-Drabek et al. 2020 | allotment gardens in four zones of Silesia Province near Zn-Pb2013–2017 | min. | ||
| Celery, as soldĆwieląg-Drabek et al. 2020 | allotment gardens in four zones of Silesia Province near Zn-Pb2013–2017 | max. | ||
| Celery, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009 | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | 26 households, Copșa Mică polluted area, Sibiu County2021–2022 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | 26 households, Copșa Mică polluted area, Sibiu County2021–2022 | mean.Same samples: 22 µg/kg (minimum); 620 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | 26 households, Copșa Mică polluted area, Sibiu County2021–2022 | geometric mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | 26 households, Copșa Mică polluted area, Sibiu County2021–2022 | min. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | 26 households, Copșa Mică polluted area, Sibiu County2021–2022 | max. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | household AS 13 (Axente Sever)2021–2022 | sample value. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | household AS 17 (Axente Sever)2021–2022 | sample value. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | household MS 3 (Micăsasa)2021–2022 | sample value. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | household SO 3 (Șoala)2021–2022 | sample value. | ||
| Celery, as soldRomero-Crespo et al. 2023 | Ponce Enriquez gold-mining area orchards2021 | not detected. | ||
| Celery, as soldRusin et al. 2021 | fresh product, Poland retail/official controlCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldRusin et al. 2021 | frozen product, Poland retail/official controlCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldRusin et al. 2021 | processed product, Poland retail/official controlCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020 | not detected. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO1997–1999Dry weight | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015–2017Dry weight | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2017Dry weight | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2018Dry weight | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024Dry weight | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 1,000 µg/kg (minimum); 59,100 µg/kg (maximum); 68,000 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | min. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | min. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | max. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | max. | ||
| Celery, as soldGrández et al. 2022 | coast (Chiclayo province), Modelo market, Chachapoyas2020Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldGrández et al. 2022 | local (Chachapoyas province), Modelo market, Chachapoyas2020Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldRusin et al. 2021 | dried product, Poland retail/official controlCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldSadee 2022 | all samples2021Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 2.5 µg/kg (minimum); 43.1 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Celery, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | min. | ||
| Celery, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | max. | ||
| Celery, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
50 findings · 18 studies · 11 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EMRO2019 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2009–2019 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2010 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2001–2019 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2006 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2006 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO1999–2018 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2003–2016 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2001–2008 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldBora et al. 2022 | amateur farmers; washed with tap water2021 | not detected. | ||
| Celery, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021 | not detected. | ||
| Celery, as soldĆwieląg-Drabek et al. 2020 | allotment gardens in four zones of Silesia Province near Zn-Pb2013–2017 | mean.Same samples: 100 µg/kg (minimum); 4,540 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Celery, as soldĆwieląg-Drabek et al. 2020 | allotment gardens in four zones of Silesia Province near Zn-Pb2013–2017 | min. | ||
| Celery, as soldĆwieląg-Drabek et al. 2020 | allotment gardens in four zones of Silesia Province near Zn-Pb2013–2017 | max. | ||
| Celery, as soldDearing et al. 2025 | genus Apium2024 | median.Same samples: 19 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Celery, as soldDearing et al. 2025 | genus Apium2024 | max. | ||
| Celery, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009 | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | 26 households, Copșa Mică polluted area, Sibiu County2021–2022 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | 26 households, Copșa Mică polluted area, Sibiu County2021–2022 | mean.Same samples: 58 µg/kg (minimum); 1,250 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | 26 households, Copșa Mică polluted area, Sibiu County2021–2022 | geometric mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | 26 households, Copșa Mică polluted area, Sibiu County2021–2022 | min. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | 26 households, Copșa Mică polluted area, Sibiu County2021–2022 | max. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | household AG 1 (Agârbiciu)2021–2022 | sample value. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | household BZ 9 (Bazna)2021–2022 | sample value. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | household MS 16 (Micăsasa)2021–2022 | sample value. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | household SO 3 (Șoala)2021–2022 | sample value. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | household SO 5 (Șoala)2021–2022 | sample value. | ||
| Celery, as soldRomero-Crespo et al. 2023 | Ponce Enriquez gold-mining area orchards2021 | sample value. | ||
| Celery, as soldRusin et al. 2021 | fresh product, Poland retail/official controlCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldRusin et al. 2021 | frozen product, Poland retail/official controlCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldRusin et al. 2021 | processed product, Poland retail/official controlCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO1997–1999Dry weight | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015–2019Dry weight | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2017Dry weight | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024Dry weight | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldAdeniyi et al. 2021 | Composite of purchases from 3 traders in each of 5 Jos marketsCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 200 µg/kg (minimum); 100 µg/kg (minimum); 4,200 µg/kg (maximum); 5,300 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | min. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | min. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | max. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | max. | ||
| Celery, as soldGrández et al. 2022 | coast (Chiclayo province), Modelo market, Chachapoyas2020Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldGrández et al. 2022 | local (Chachapoyas province), Modelo market, Chachapoyas2020Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldSadee 2022 | all samples2021Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 3.74 µg/kg (minimum); 46.2 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Celery, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | min. | ||
| Celery, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | max. | ||
| Celery, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
19 findings · 6 studies | ||||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2012–2022 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2023 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000–2002 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2012 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2010 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2002–2011 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2016–2022 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2009–2016 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2001–2008 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldRomero-Crespo et al. 2023 | Ponce Enriquez gold-mining area orchards2021 | not detected. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024Dry weight | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldAdeniyi et al. 2021 | Composite of purchases from 3 traders in each of 5 Jos marketsCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldGrández et al. 2022 | coast (Chiclayo province), Modelo market, Chachapoyas2020Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldGrández et al. 2022 | local (Chachapoyas province), Modelo market, Chachapoyas2020Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
3 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012 | all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 | European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not stated | mean. | ||
11 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2012–2015 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2010 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2009 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2017 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2004–2016 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2001–2008 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldDabeka et al. 2003 | Ottawa composite (retail Oct-Nov 2000)1998–2000 | sample value. | ||
| Celery, as soldDabeka et al. 2003 | Whitehorse composite (retail Jan-Feb 1998)1998–2000 | sample value. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024Dry weight | median. | ||
7 findings · 7 studies · 1 spread figure folded in | ||||
| Celery, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldDearing et al. 2025 | genus Apium2024 | median.Same samples: 30 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Celery, as soldDearing et al. 2025 | genus Apium2024 | max. | ||
| Celery, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009 | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldRomero-Crespo et al. 2023 | Ponce Enriquez gold-mining area orchards2021 | sample value. | ||
| Celery, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
9 findings · 7 studies | ||||
| Celery, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, LB2000–2013 | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, UB2000–2013 | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009 | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldRomero-Crespo et al. 2023 | Ponce Enriquez gold-mining area orchards2021 | sample value. | ||
| Celery, as soldGrández et al. 2022 | coast (Chiclayo province), Modelo market, Chachapoyas2020Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldGrández et al. 2022 | local (Chachapoyas province), Modelo market, Chachapoyas2020Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldSadee 2022 | all samples2021Dry weight | mean. | ||
7 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2009 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024Dry weight | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
3 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2009 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Celery, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Celery, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020 | median. | ||
3 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Celery, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009 | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
8 findings · 5 studies · 6 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | 26 households, Copșa Mică polluted area, Sibiu County2021–2022 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | 26 households, Copșa Mică polluted area, Sibiu County2021–2022 | mean.Same samples: 600 µg/kg (minimum); 2,510 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | 26 households, Copșa Mică polluted area, Sibiu County2021–2022 | geometric mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | 26 households, Copșa Mică polluted area, Sibiu County2021–2022 | min. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | 26 households, Copșa Mică polluted area, Sibiu County2021–2022 | max. | ||
| Celery, as soldRomero-Crespo et al. 2023 | Ponce Enriquez gold-mining area orchards2021 | sample value. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 3,300 µg/kg (minimum); 7,400 µg/kg (minimum); 25,900 µg/kg (maximum); 30,200 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | min. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | min. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | max. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | max. | ||
| Celery, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldSadee 2022 | all samples2021Dry weight | mean. | ||
2 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Celery, as soldAdeniyi et al. 2021 | Composite of purchases from 3 traders in each of 5 Jos marketsCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
3 findings · 2 studies · 4 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 18,000 µg/kg (minimum); 13,000 µg/kg (minimum); 63,000 µg/kg (maximum); 43,000 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | min. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | min. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | max. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | max. | ||
| Celery, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
10 findings · 6 studies · 8 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Celery, as soldBora et al. 2022 | amateur farmers; washed with tap water2021 | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021 | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldĆwieląg-Drabek et al. 2020 | allotment gardens in four zones of Silesia Province near Zn-Pb2013–2017 | mean.Same samples: 26,200 µg/kg (minimum); 89,500 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Celery, as soldĆwieląg-Drabek et al. 2020 | allotment gardens in four zones of Silesia Province near Zn-Pb2013–2017 | min. | ||
| Celery, as soldĆwieląg-Drabek et al. 2020 | allotment gardens in four zones of Silesia Province near Zn-Pb2013–2017 | max. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | 26 households, Copșa Mică polluted area, Sibiu County2021–2022 | median. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | 26 households, Copșa Mică polluted area, Sibiu County2021–2022 | mean.Same samples: 3,100 µg/kg (minimum); 11,700 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | 26 households, Copșa Mică polluted area, Sibiu County2021–2022 | geometric mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | 26 households, Copșa Mică polluted area, Sibiu County2021–2022 | min. | ||
| Celery, as soldOprea et al. 2022 | 26 households, Copșa Mică polluted area, Sibiu County2021–2022 | max. | ||
| Celery, as soldRomero-Crespo et al. 2023 | Ponce Enriquez gold-mining area orchards2021 | sample value. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | mean.Same samples: 46,000 µg/kg (minimum); 34,000 µg/kg (minimum); 96,000 µg/kg (maximum); 108,000 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | min. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | min. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | max. | ||
| Celery, as soldauthors 2025 | 16 allotment gardens, Warsaw2022–2023Dry weight | max. | ||
| Celery, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Celery, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
3 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Celery, as soldBora et al. 2022 | amateur farmers; washed with tap water2021 | not detected. | ||
| Celery, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021 | not detected. | ||
| Celery, as soldSadee 2022 | all samples2021Dry weight | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Celery, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
Shared dataset methods and interpretation
Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.
HMI celery Pb reference · Celery, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI celery Pb reference · Celery, as sold. Celery, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤4 | ≤4 | ≤5 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤4 | ≤4 | ≤5 |
105 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 77 | 33% |
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 33% |
| Spungen et al. 2024 | 1 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for celery, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:celery-631a6cc17a94:9d9cbb475c67
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI celery Pb reference · Celery, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI celery Pb reference · Celery, as sold, dry weight. Celery, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤78 | 61.5–100 (bounded) | 118–125 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤78 | 61.5–100 (bounded) | 118–125 (bounded) |
8 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 8 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for celery, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for celery, as sold on this basis in the completed celery ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:celery-1abad7aa174c:750be182b5b8
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI celery Cd reference · Celery, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI celery Cd reference · Celery, as sold. Celery, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 16 | 21 | 38 |
| Alternative weighting | 16 | 21 | 38 |
95 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 67 | 33% |
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 33% |
| Dearing et al. 2025 | 1 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for celery, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:celery-66ec07dda65c:e702d2fddd30
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI celery Cd reference · Celery, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI celery Cd reference · Celery, as sold, dry weight. Celery, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤50 | 360 | 590 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤50 | 360 | 590 |
9 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 9 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for celery, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for celery, as sold on this basis in the completed celery ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:celery-2c7f23535315:587877a03a7a
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI celery tAs reference · Celery, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI celery tAs reference · Celery, as sold. Celery, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤3 | ≤3.5 | 4.1–14.1 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤3 | ≤3.5 | 4.1–9.15 (bounded) |
60 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 33 | 50% |
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for celery, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:celery-e72bb710b86b:17259115515c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI celery iAs reference · Celery, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI celery iAs reference · Celery, as sold. Celery, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 2.5–4 (bounded) | 2.5–4 (bounded) | 2.5–4 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | 2.5–4 (bounded) | 2.5–4 (bounded) | 2.5–4 (bounded) |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for celery, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for celery, as sold on this basis in the completed celery ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:celery-78366e3f687a:6b40644914b6
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI celery tHg reference · Celery, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI celery tHg reference · Celery, as sold. Celery, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.5 | ≤1 | 0.28–1 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.5 | ≤1 | 0.265–1 (bounded) |
48 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 19 | 33% |
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 33% |
| Dabeka et al. 2003 | 2 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for celery, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:celery-1328c540185c:c0c012f3383e
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI celery Ni reference · Celery, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI celery Ni reference · Celery, as sold. Celery, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤27 | 27–33.5 (bounded) | 27–40 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤27 | 27–33.5 (bounded) | 27–40 (bounded) |
28 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 50% |
| Dearing et al. 2025 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for celery, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:celery-e354b80999db:5cff0a7f4f00
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI celery Cr reference · Celery, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI celery Cr reference · Celery, as sold. Celery, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for celery, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for celery, as sold on this basis in the completed celery ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:celery-7ea871e02bb5:0b9ecb078d80
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI celery Al reference · Celery, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI celery Al reference · Celery, as sold. Celery, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 570 | 585–703 (bounded) | 1370 |
| Alternative weighting | 570 | 585–703 (bounded) | 1370 |
3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 3 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for celery, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for celery, as sold on this basis in the completed celery ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:celery-7270abe916d6:adc2cffae635
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI celery Sn reference · Celery, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI celery Sn reference · Celery, as sold. Celery, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 0.97–6.35 (bounded) | 7.31–11.3 (bounded) | 16.9 |
| Alternative weighting | 0.97–6.35 (bounded) | 7.31–11.3 (bounded) | 16.9 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for celery, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for celery, as sold on this basis in the completed celery ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:celery-27ecca3ca80a:7d848bf06259
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI celery U reference · Celery, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI celery U reference · Celery, as sold. Celery, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for celery, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for celery, as sold on this basis in the completed celery ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:celery-b7f2d1681261:9ec454dd3300
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
The source reports only a percentile, range or maximum for these samples, with no mean or median to place against the reference. Spread figures that do have a mean or median are shown on that row instead.
The value could not be reconciled with its own paper, so it is shown but not compared.
The result is below a reporting limit, and the range from zero to that limit crosses more than one band.
No medians or sample values exist for this form and metal, so no HMI reference could be built.
The HMI reference for this form has fewer than four units or no measurable spread, below the display minimum.
The result is on a basis (dry weight, or not stated) that no HMI reference for this form uses, so it cannot be placed.
Reporting limits overlap the study comparison, so no direction can be shown.
No findings match these filters. Change the selection or reset to show all source findings.
How metals reach celery
The evidence on how metals reach celery comes from studies that compared exposed and ordinary settings. Celery, as sold from fresh product, Poland retail/official control had cadmium higher at 152 µg/kg, against 44 µg/kg for frozen product, Poland retail/official control in the same study.7Concentration of cadmium and lead in vegetables and fruitsScientific ReportsRead source →
These are observational comparisons from single studies; the size of the difference depends on the site, metal and distance.
Which forms and regions measured lower
The HMI reference for lead in celery, as sold pools 105 subgroup units from 3 sampling families, with a median of below 4 µg/kg and a middle half spanning below 4 (lower quartile) and below 5 µg/kg (upper quartile).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →11Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source → For lead in celery, as sold, the reference median was between 61.5 and 100 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 78 to between 118 and 125 µg/kg across 8 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium in celery, as sold, the reference median was 21 µg/kg, with a middle half from 16 to 38 µg/kg across 95 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →8Assessment of Heavy Metals in Organic and Non-Organic Vegetables Post Severe Tropical Cyclone Gabrielle: A cross-sectional comparative analysisF1000ResearchRead source →
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, celery, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in WPRO (3 µg/kg) and the highest in PAHO (620 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in WPRO (10 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (640 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Targeted celery, as sold samples in EURO had cadmium higher at 39 µg/kg, against 11 µg/kg for EURO in the same study.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In another study, targeted celery, as sold samples in WPRO had cadmium lower at 8 µg/kg, against 53 µg/kg for WPRO in the same study.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Processing, cooking and preparation
No processing study for metals in this food is in the library yet.
Mitigation for celery
Lot testing against the applicable limit is the check that can be verified.
No measured way to lower metals in this food is in the library yet.
Trade-offs and limits of controls
Avoiding exposed growing areas lowered the metal measured in the studies available, but no study measured the cost or supply effect of doing so.7Concentration of cadmium and lead in vegetables and fruitsScientific ReportsRead source → Metals do not move together, so a lot that passes a lead limit says little about cadmium, arsenic or nickel unless those are tested as well.
Testing celery for metals
Results depend on the method and its reporting limit. Reporting limits for lead ranged from 2 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 3,000 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Reporting limits for cadmium ranged from 0.5 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 50 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Reporting limits for total arsenic ranged from 3 µg/kg (FDA Total Diet Study) to 500 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →
A useful lot result names the form, the basis and a quantification limit well below the limit that applies.
Buying and verifying celery
No maximum level for metals in celery was verified from primary text for this page; buyers should confirm the limit that applies in the destination market.
Exposure from celery
No source in the library converted celery concentrations into a verified estimate of intake for a defined population. Concentrations describe the food, not individual risk.
Evidence review and remaining gaps
Every source record that names celery was decided on its content: 23 occurrence extracted, 23 records in all. The occurrence table renders every extracted result; held values remain visible with their reason.
References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.
Celery FAQs
What heavy metals are found in celery?
The library reports lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, As and Mo in celery, most often lead, cadmium and total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Quantification and Reduction in Heavy Metal Residues in Some Fruits and Vegetables: A Case Study Galați County, RomaniaHorticulturaeRead source →4Risk of cadmium, lead and zinc exposure from consumption of vegetables produced in areas with mining and smelting pastScientific ReportsRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in celery, as sold from 1,027 results in 4 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 3 to 620 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
How do heavy metals get into celery?
In the studies available, celery from contaminated or exposed settings carried more metal than celery from the same study’s control.7Concentration of cadmium and lead in vegetables and fruitsScientific ReportsRead source → Celery, as sold from frozen product, Poland retail/official control had lead higher at 64 µg/kg, against 31 µg/kg for fresh product, Poland retail/official control in the same study.7Concentration of cadmium and lead in vegetables and fruitsScientific ReportsRead source →
Which regions report the lowest levels in celery?
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, celery, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in WPRO (3 µg/kg) and the highest in PAHO (620 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in WPRO (10 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (640 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
How much of the arsenic in celery is inorganic?
Inorganic arsenic, the more toxic form, was measured in 3 results from 3 sources, far fewer than total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →12The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →13Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597Read source → Across 2 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported inorganic arsenic means and medians with the basis not stated ranged from 4 µg/kg (Centre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012) to 10.9 µg/kg (European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014).12The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →13Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597Read source →
References
Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.
- GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsDataset
- FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsDataset
- Quantification and Reduction in Heavy Metal Residues in Some Fruits and Vegetables: A Case Study Galați County, RomaniaPeer-reviewed
- Risk of cadmium, lead and zinc exposure from consumption of vegetables produced in areas with mining and smelting pastPeer-reviewed
- Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthPeer-reviewed
- HEAVY METALS ACCUMULATION IN SOIL AND CELERY ROOT (APIUM GRAVEOLENS L.) HARVESTED FROM THE POLLUTED AREAS IN SIBIU COUNTY, CENTRAL ROMANIAPeer-reviewed
- Concentration of cadmium and lead in vegetables and fruitsPeer-reviewed
- Assessment of Heavy Metals in Organic and Non-Organic Vegetables Post Severe Tropical Cyclone Gabrielle: A cross-sectional comparative analysisPeer-reviewed
- Assessment of Heavy Metals Concentration and Health Risks of Selected Vegetables Sold In Jos MetropolisPeer-reviewed
- Determination of some heavy metals and their potential risk in selected vegetables on sale within Kaduna Metropolis, Kaduna State, NigeriaPeer-reviewed
- Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Peer-reviewed
- The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicGovernment
- Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationGovernment
Sources
Browse Celery Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.
Update history
22 October 2026: Rebuilt from every celery record in the library: 23 occurrence sources, references by form and basis, same-study contrasts.
