Whole milk generally has low metal concentrations because transfer from feed into milk is restricted, though some market samples contain detectable lead.
- Metals of concern: lead, cadmium, total arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, and uranium are covered, with many results below reporting limits.
- Main drivers: feed and pasture contamination determine inputs, while the cow’s physiology restricts cadmium and lead transfer into milk.
- Practical framing: non-detects are not measured zeroes; drying concentrates solutes, and testing is warranted for contaminated-area sourcing and infant-formula applications.
This page draws on evidence from UK Food Standards Agency and FDA, together with 6 peer-reviewed studies. The complete citation list is at the bottom of the page.
Overview
FSA/Fera measured this ingredient or non-infant-specific food composite in Table 6 of the FS102048 survey. Exact concentration values remain in progress until Table 6 is parsed into structured ingredient rows with less-than and semi-quantitative flags preserved. Survey of metals in commercial infant foods, infant formula and non-infant specific foods
Why this commodity accumulates heavy metals
Whole milk is a low-accumulator matrix for most heavy metals. The dairy cow’s physiology actively restricts the transfer of ingested metals from blood to milk; this is particularly effective for cadmium and lead, which are tightly regulated across biological membranes. The transfer factor from feed to milk for cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) is very low (typically below 1 percent for Pb, and even lower for Cd), meaning that even when cows graze on Cd-or Pb-contaminated pastures, the resulting milk carries concentrations well below those of the feed. Mercury transfer to milk is similarly restricted. The FDA TDS FY2018-FY2020 data for whole fluid milk (n=27) record all seven measured analytes (Cd, chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), Pb, uranium (U), total arsenic (tAs), tHg) at zero across the entire distribution (FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical Results), consistent with the well-established low-risk characterisation of fluid dairy from non-contaminated herds. Marques et al. (2021) detected Pb in non-organic whole milk at trace levels in Spanish retail samples by ICP-MS (Essential and Non-essential Trace Elements in Milks and Plant-Based Drinks), illustrating that Pb is detectable in some market contexts even if distribution-wide surveys show predominantly zero values. Whole milk’s fat content relative to skim milk results in slightly higher concentrations of lipophilic metal species, but this effect is minor for the regulated heavy metals of concern.
Heavy metal contamination profile
This table summarizes the available occurrence evidence for each metal. A data gap means the literature was reviewed for this commodity and metal but no usable occurrence data was found. Key sources link to contributing studies.
| Analyte | Coverage | Typical (ppb) | Confidence | Key sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead (Pb) | n=5 | 1–20 | medium | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |
| Cadmium (Cd) | n=5 | 0–2 | low | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |
| Inorganic arsenic (iAs) | data gap | — | — | — |
| Total arsenic (tAs) | n=1 dataset; composites=27 | ND (<1; source reporting limit) | low | 1 |
| Total mercury (tHg) | n=4 | 0–1 | low | 1, 2, 3, 4 |
| Nickel (Ni) | n=3 | 0–120 | low | 1, 2, 3 |
| Aluminum (Al) | data gap | — | — | — |
| Chromium (Cr) | n=2 | 0–20 | low | 1, 2 |
| Tin (Sn) | data gap | — | — | — |
| Uranium (U) | n=1 dataset; composites=27 | ND (<1; source reporting limit) | low | 1 |
Synthesis basis and censoring treatment
The per-analyte values above were resynthesized on 2026-08-09 on a liquid whole-milk as-consumed (wet-weight) basis. The earlier profile reported lead, cadmium, total mercury, nickel, and chromium at typical and 95th-percentile values of zero. Those figures were an artifact of FDA Total Diet Study composites in which every whole-milk sample fell below the reporting limit (lead 1, cadmium 1, mercury 1, nickel 20, chromium 25 micrograms per kilogram) and the reported non-detects were pooled as literal zeros. Values below the analytical reporting or detection limit are treated here as left-censored, not as measured zeros.
Lead in commercial milk is low but non-zero, with a regional right tail. Starska et al. 2011, sampling 483 Polish milk and dairy products, reports a milk mean of 8 and a 90th percentile of 17 micrograms per kilogram, with two of 75 milk samples above the 20 microgram per kilogram Codex maximum level and a maximum of 50. Chen et al. 2020 reports a Chinese cow-milk mean of 23.4, above the Codex level, and Davidov et al. 2019 a Serbian mean of 80 described by the authors as just above recommended values. Cadmium, chromium, and total mercury sit at or below a few micrograms per kilogram across these datasets; total mercury in particular is genuinely trace, with Pankiewicz et al. 2012 reporting Polish milk at 0.03 to 0.06. Nickel spans from below the FDA reporting limit to the 119 microgram per kilogram Serbian mean. Values reported only in a contaminated-market survey (Ibrahim et al. 2024, Egyptian raw-milk cadmium mean 90) are carried as an elevated-context tail rather than adopted as the central value.
Routing
This ingredient is listed in the ingredient index.
Contamination Profile State
Per-analyte state — populated, in progress, or declared data gap — is carried authoritatively in the machine-readable contamination_profile frontmatter and the contamination-profile table above. Ingredient-level values belong here; finished-product values belong on the relevant product-category page.
FDA TDS FY2018-FY2020 Evidence
FDA’s FY2018-FY2020 Total Diet Study dataset includes this page’s routed matrix as TDS Food 1, “Milk, whole, fluid.” The normalized row-level data is stored in data/evidence/fda_tds_fy2018_2020_element_results_samples.csv, with per-food/per-analyte summaries in data/evidence/fda_tds_fy2018_2020_summary_by_food_analyte.csv. Concentrations are retained as FDA reported them, with reporting limits preserved separately; reported zeroes are not rewritten as <LOD without a source-specific rule. FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical Results
FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 source observations
FDA measured the prepared foods named below. Each row describes that food and preparation, not every form of this ingredient. Values are µg/kg (ppb) on the FDA sample basis. ND means not detected; it is not a measured zero. Reporting limits can vary between composites. FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical Results
| FDA food and preparation | Analyte | Composites | Detected | Detected concentrations (ppb) | Reporting limits (ppb) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1: Milk, whole, fluid | tAs | 27 | 0 | ND in all composites | 1 |
| 1: Milk, whole, fluid | Cd | 27 | 0 | ND in all composites | 1 |
| 1: Milk, whole, fluid | Cr | 27 | 0 | ND in all composites | 25 |
| 1: Milk, whole, fluid | Pb | 27 | 0 | ND in all composites | 1 |
| 1: Milk, whole, fluid | tHg | 27 | 0 | ND in all composites | 1 |
| 1: Milk, whole, fluid | Ni | 27 | 0 | ND in all composites | 20 |
| 1: Milk, whole, fluid | U | 27 | 0 | ND in all composites | 1 |
Ranges by source, region, and variety
FDA TDS FY2018-FY2020 data (n=27) for whole fluid milk in the US show zero values across all analytes (Cd, Cr, Ni, Pb, U, tAs, tHg) throughout the distribution (FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical Results). The Marques et al. 2021 Spanish retail study detected Pb in non-organic whole cow milk, illustrating that while distribution-wide surveys show predominantly zero values, some market contexts yield detectable Pb (Essential and Non-essential Trace Elements in Milks and Plant-Based Drinks). Dairy from herds grazing pastures with elevated Pb or Cd, such as land near legacy mining or smelting operations, can produce milk with elevated concentrations; this is a localised exception rather than a characteristic of the commodity category. Organic versus conventional milk is not systematically associated with different metal profiles in the published literature, as the primary determinant of milk metal content is the metal burden of the pasture and feed rather than production system.
Processing effects
Pasteurisation (HTST or UHT) does not significantly alter the metal content of milk; the thermal treatment targets microbial pathogens rather than mineral or metal composition. Homogenisation, which breaks up fat globules to produce uniform fat distribution, does not change total metal concentrations. Ultra-high temperature (UHT) processing and sterilisation similarly leave metal concentrations unchanged. Spray-drying of whole milk to produce whole milk powder concentrates all solutes including metals in proportion to the water removed, roughly by a factor of 7 to 8 (reflecting the reconstitution ratio of approximately 1 part powder to 7 parts water); however, because the starting fluid milk concentrations are near or below detection limits, the resulting whole milk powder concentrations remain very low even after this concentration step. Evaporated milk, which is concentrated but not fully dried, shows a similar concentration factor.
Ingredient-derivative risk
Whole milk is the starting material for a range of dairy derivatives including cream, butter, cheese, yogurt, condensed milk, evaporated milk, and whole milk powder. In all of these derivatives, the metal profile of the raw milk is carried through with modification only by the concentration or dilution factor of the processing step. Cheese production involves concentration of protein and fat (which removes whey), so any metals associated with the protein or fat fraction may be slightly concentrated in the curd; however, cheese metal concentrations remain very low given the near-zero starting point of fluid milk. Butter, which is almost pure fat, carries minimal metals. Whey protein products (whey protein concentrate, whey protein isolate) are addressed on separate ingredient pages and may carry different metal profiles from the whey fraction.
Mitigation options
Sourcing levers
Sourcing milk from herds grazing on non-contaminated pastures in regions without legacy industrial Pb or Cd soil loading is the primary upstream lever, though this is rarely a practical concern for commercially produced whole milk at population scale. In geographies with legacy mining or smelting activity adjacent to dairy farming, pasture metal testing and milk surveillance are appropriate.
Agronomic levers
No quantified data on this lever in the current corpus; section will be expanded when relevant evidence is ingested.
Processing levers
No quantified data on this lever in the current corpus; section will be expanded when relevant evidence is ingested.
Formulation levers
No quantified data on this lever in the current corpus; section will be expanded when relevant evidence is ingested.
Testing and QC levers
Routine heavy metal testing of commercial whole milk for Pb and Cd is unlikely to yield actionable values under standard supply-chain conditions. Testing is warranted for dairy sourced from geographic areas with known soil contamination, or for product categories such as infant formula where milk is a primary ingredient and regulatory scrutiny of metals is high.
Packaging and storage levers
No quantified data on this lever in the current corpus; section will be expanded when relevant evidence is ingested.
Regulatory limits that apply
The European Union sets a maximum level for Pb in raw milk, heat-treated milk, and milk-based products of 0.020 mg/kg (20 ppb) under EU Regulation 2023/915 maximum levels for contaminants in food. No EU maximum level is set for Cd in fluid milk because Cd transfer to milk from contaminated feed is very low. No maximum level for mercury (Hg) in milk is promulgated under current EU contaminant regulations. In the US, no FDA action level for Pb, Cd, or Hg in fluid cow milk is currently enforced under the FDA Closer to Zero — Program Overview programme, which focuses on processed infant foods and baby foods rather than raw milk constituents. Codex Alimentarius — Maximum Levels for Cadmium in Food includes provisions for Pb in milk at 0.020 mg/kg, consistent with the EU limit.
Interpretation of source evidence
Source observations and population estimates are different. A non-detect supplies a reporting-limit bound for the tested composites. It does not show that this ingredient contains zero metal. Where a previous profile lacked matching source, species or basis support, its generic concentration has been withdrawn; the available source evidence is kept below.
tAs. FDA source observations are non-detects at the reporting limits below. They do not estimate a zero population concentration; other literature remains separate context.
U. FDA source observations are non-detects at the reporting limits below. They do not estimate a zero population concentration; other literature remains separate context.
Other previously cited literature is retained as context; it does not establish the withdrawn numerical profile: Essential and Non-essential Trace Elements in Milks and Plant-Based Drinks.
References
Works cited in this page’s text, in first-appearance order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.
- Survey of metals in commercial infant foods, infant formula and non-infant specific foodsGovernment
- FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsDataset
- Essential and Non-essential Trace Elements in Milks and Plant-Based DrinksPeer-reviewed
- Noxious Elements in Milk and Milk Products in PolandPeer-reviewed
- Analysis of 17 elements in cow, goat, buffalo, yak, and camel milk by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)Peer-reviewed
- Contamination of Cow Milk by Heavy Metals in SerbiaPeer-reviewed
- Monitoring of total mercury level in selected dairy products from the south-east regions of PolandPeer-reviewed
- Heavy metals in raw milk and Egyptian cheese typesPeer-reviewed
Sources
Source records associated with this topic. Inclusion does not establish that every finding applies to this product or ingredient. References above identify works cited in the text.
| # | Citation | Year | Type | Used on this page for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adilbekov et al. 2026. Technogenic contamination of livestock- and fish-derived food products with heavy metals and radionuclides in industrial and post-nuclear regions of Kazakhstan, Veterinary World 2026, 19(3): 1052-1068 | 2026 | Peer-reviewed | Contribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope. |
| 2 | Salahel et al. 2025. Assessment of toxic heavy metals in commonly consumed foods in Egypt and their implications for public health and safety, Scientific Reports | 2025 | Peer-reviewed | EG Pb, Cd, Cr, tAs occurrence in Fifty-four food and beverage samples collected January-December 2022 from local markets in Qena Governorate, southern Egypt: beverages (n=20;… (n=54) |
| 3 | Shahzad et al. 2025. Assessment of hazardous trace metals and associated health risk as affected by feed intake in buffalo milk, Scientific Reports 15:9841 | 2025 | Peer-reviewed | PK Pb, Cd, tHg, tAs, Mn, Fe occurrence in Ninety buffalo-milk samples from Tehsil Daska, District Sialkot, Pakistan, grouped by buffalo feed category: alfalfa fodder, maize silage,… (n=90) |
| 4 | Cai et al. 2024. Comparison of Double-Stranded DNA at the 5-Prime and 3-Prime Ends of the G-Triplex and Its Application in the Detection of Hg(II), International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25 (2024) 8159 | 2024 | Peer-reviewed | Contribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope. |
| 5 | Yildiz et al. 2024. Determination of Some Minerals and Heavy metals in Raw Cow’s Milk Collected from Different Regions of Muş Province, Afyon Kocatepe University – Journal of Science and Engineering (AKU J. Sci. Eng.) | 2024 | Peer-reviewed | TR Pb, Cd, Fe, Cu, Mn, Mg, Zn occurrence in 10 raw cow milk samples from different regions of Muş province, eastern Turkey (n=10) |
| 6 | Arellano et al. 2023. Arsenic risk assessment through dairy products ingestion, Arsenic in the Environment: Bridging Science to Practice for Sustainable Development | 2023 | Conference proceedings | AR tAs occurrence in Raw bovine, caprine, and ovine milk from 37 farms in Cordoba and Buenos Aires provinces, plus market commercial… (n=157) |
| 7 | Newton et al. 2023. Variation in macrominerals and trace elements in cows’ retail milk and implications for consumers nutrition, Food Chemistry 418 (2023) 135809 | 2023 | Peer-reviewed | Contribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope. |
| 8 | FDA 2022. FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical Results, FDA Total Diet Study | 2022 | Government dataset | FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 Cd, Cr, Ni, Pb, U, tAs, tHg occurrence distributions for Milk, whole, fluid (n=27); all analytes reported as zero (BDL) |
| 9 | Hasan et al. 2022. Determination of heavy metals in raw and pasteurized liquid milk of Bangladesh to assess the potential health risks, Food Research | 2022 | Peer-reviewed | BD Fe, Cu, Mn, Zn, Pb, Cd, Cr, tAs occurrence in 64 raw cow milk samples and 64 liquid pasteurized milk samples collected from 64 administrative areas of Bangladesh… (n=128) |
| 10 | Cıdıroğlu et al. 2021. Investigation of Heavy Metal Residues in Heat-Treated Drinking Milk Offered for Sale in the Market, Kocatepe Veterinary Journal 14(2):231-237 | 2021 | Peer-reviewed | Contribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope. |
| 11 | Marques et al. 2021. Essential and Non-essential Trace Elements in Milks and Plant-Based Drinks, Biological Trace Element Research | 2021 | Peer-reviewed | Pb, tHg, Ni, and U in Spanish retail whole cow milk by ICP-MS; Pb detected in non-organic whole milk; finished-milk matrix context supplementing FDA TDS data |
| 12 | EL et al. 2020. Aluminum exposure from food in the population of Lebanon, Toxicology Reports | 2020 | Peer-reviewed | LB Al occurrence in Ninety-seven food items collected May–September 2018 from the Beirut retail market (105 sampled; 8 discarded for turbidity), comprising… (n=97) |
| 13 | Elbagermi et al. 2020. Evaluation of essential and heavy metal levels in pasteurized and long-life cow milk, International Journal of Advanced Chemistry 8(1): 6-14 | 2020 | Peer-reviewed | Contribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope. |
| 14 | Sadeghi et al. 2020. Measurement of Zinc, Copper, Lead, and Cadmium in the Variety of Packaging Milk and Raw Milk in Tehran Markets by Anodic Striping Voltammetry, Journal of Chemical Health Risks 10(3) (2020) 175-183 | 2020 | Peer-reviewed | Contribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope. |
| 15 | Lukáčová et al. 2012. Concentration of Selected Elements in Raw and Ultra Heat Treated Cow Milk, Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences 2(2), 795-802 | 2012 | Peer-reviewed | Contribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope. |
| 16 | Pankiewicz 2012. Monitoring of total mercury level in selected dairy products from the south-east regions of Poland, Ecological Chemistry and Engineering A | 2012 | Peer-reviewed | PL tHg occurrence in 48 dairy products (milk, kefir, natural and flavoured yogurt, cream, cream cheese, cottage cheese, butter, milk powder, buttermilk,… (n=48) |
| 17 | Starska et al. 2011. Noxious Elements in Milk and Milk Products in Poland, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies | 2011 | Peer-reviewed | PL Pb, Cd, tHg, tAs occurrence in 483 milk and dairy product samples from all 16 Polish voivodships (2006–2007); 92% domestic production, 8% imported from… (n=483) |
| 18 | De et al. 2010. Toxic Metals (Pb and Cd) and Their Respective Antagonists (Ca and Zn) in Infant Formulas and Milk Marketed in Brasilia, Brazil, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2010, 7: 4062-4077 | 2010 | Peer-reviewed | Contribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope. |
| 19 | Qin et al. 2009. The Minerals and Heavy Metals in Cow’s Milk from China and Japan, Journal of Health Science 55(2):300-305 | 2009 | Peer-reviewed | Contribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope. |
| 20 | Roberge et al. 2009. Presence of Arsenic in Commercial Beverages, American Journal of Environmental Sciences 5 (6): 688-694, 2009 | 2009 | Peer-reviewed | Contribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope. |
| 21 | Thomson et al. 2008. Dietary exposure and trends of exposure to nutrient elements iodine, iron, selenium and sodium from the 2003-4 New Zealand Total Diet Survey, British Journal of Nutrition 99: 614-625 | 2008 | Peer-reviewed | Contribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope. |
| 22 | Thorn et al. 1978. Trace nutrients. Selenium in British food, British Journal of Nutrition 39: 391-396 | 1978 | Government report | Contribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope. |
Update history
No substantive edit history is available in this build. The full commit record is available in git.
