Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index
An unmarked open milk can, a milk bottle, a glass of milk and a separate dish of cream illustrating arellano2023 dairy products arsenic argentina research context.

Arsenic risk assessment through dairy products ingestion

Overview

Arellano and colleagues measured total arsenic in raw milk, commercial milk, powdered milk, infant formula, and cheese from Argentina, then estimated arsenic intake and target risk for infants, children, pregnant consumers, and adults. The chapter is occurrence evidence for total arsenic in dairy matrices and infant formula, but it does not speciate inorganic arsenic separately from total arsenic.

Key numbers

The study reports a detection limit of 10 ng/g for arsenic. For raw milk, 9.52% of bovine milk, 8% of goat milk, and 7.55% of sheep milk samples exceeded the Mercosur 20 ng/g maximum tolerance limit cited by the authors.

Table 1 reports total arsenic concentrations:

MatrixNMean AsRange
Goat raw milk25< LOD< LOD-70 ng/g
Sheep raw milk40< LOD< LOD-80 ng/g
Cow raw milk42< LOD< LOD-110 ng/g
Commercial milk3626.7 +/- 4.78 ng/g< LOD-167 ng/g
Cheese1420.6 +/- 12.3 ng/g< LOD-142 ng/g

Table 2 reports total arsenic in powdered dairy and infant formula:

MatrixMean AsRange
Infant formula20.50 +/- 6.31 ng/g< LOD-36 ng/g
Skimmed powdered milk26.00 +/- 2.72 ng/g< LOD-38 ng/g
Whole powdered milk16.30 +/- 3.13 ng/g< LOD-44 ng/g

Table 3 reports arsenic daily intake rates through commercial milk and cheese, with infants having the highest median intake. For commercial milk, infant median intake was 0.30 with range 0-2.29; children were 0.08 with range 0-0.59; pregnant consumers were 0.03 with range 0-0.27; adults were 0.02 with range 0-0.14. For cheese, infant median intake was 0.14 with range 0-1.95; children were 0.04 with range 0-0.50; pregnant consumers were 0.02 with range 0-0.23; adults were 0.01 with range 0-0.12.

The target-risk figure states that no estimated target risk exceeded 1, but values for whole powdered milk (TR = 0.95), skimmed powdered milk (TR = 0.92), and commercial fluid milk (TR = 0.97) were close to the threshold.

Methods (brief)

Raw bovine, caprine, and ovine milk samples came from 37 dairy farms in southeastern Cordoba province and northern Buenos Aires province. The authors also sampled commercial milk (n = 36) and cheeses (n = 14) from markets in the study areas. Samples were lyophilized and digested in triplicate with 5 mL nitric acid in a microwave-heated digestor, then diluted to 10% v/v acidity. Arsenic was measured by ICP-MS on mass m/z 75 without collision or reaction gas. Statistical analyses used Infostat and risk assessment used @Risk.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c312026-08-04major1 section added
3171d069e32026-08-02major1 section added
90a2f9a38e2026-07-30major1 section added and 1 removed; narrative text revised
eaa8eeeedf2026-07-27major1 section added
50de6ab2172026-07-27minorNarrative text revised