Vegetable juice in the HMI library has 108 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, uranium and Co from 16 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Assessment of cadmium and lead content in tomatoes and tomato productsRoczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny (Annals of the National Institute of Hygiene)Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →5Analytical Results for Lead in Juice Sampled Under the FDA’s Toxic Elements in Food and Foodware, and Radionuclides in Food – Import and Domestic Compliance Program (FY2005-FY2018)FDA analytical results tableRead source →6Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Journal of AOAC InternationalRead source →
-
Metals measured:
Lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid and total mercury and others, in 108 results from 16 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Assessment of cadmium and lead content in tomatoes and tomato productsRoczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny (Annals of the National Institute of Hygiene)Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →
-
Main drivers:
Form, basis and where the vegetable juice was sampled; reporting limits decide how many results are non-detects.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Assessment of cadmium and lead content in tomatoes and tomato productsRoczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny (Annals of the National Institute of Hygiene)Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →
-
Practical framing:
Ask for lot results with a quantification limit well below the limit that applies in the destination market.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Assessment of cadmium and lead content in tomatoes and tomato productsRoczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny (Annals of the National Institute of Hygiene)Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →
Vegetable juice overview
Vegetable juice in the HMI library has 108 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, uranium and Co from 16 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Assessment of cadmium and lead content in tomatoes and tomato productsRoczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny (Annals of the National Institute of Hygiene)Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →5Analytical Results for Lead in Juice Sampled Under the FDA’s Toxic Elements in Food and Foodware, and Radionuclides in Food – Import and Domestic Compliance Program (FY2005-FY2018)FDA analytical results tableRead source →6Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Journal of AOAC InternationalRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in vegetable juice, juice from 869 results in 4 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 1.15 to 6.6 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In the US Total Diet Study, vegetable juice, juice had a median lead result below 1 µg/kg across 3 composites from 2018–2020.2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →
Across 2 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported lead means and medians with the basis not stated ranged from 0 µg/kg (EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010) to 44.4 µg/kg (Dabeka et al. 1995).6Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Journal of AOAC InternationalRead source →7Scientific Opinion on Lead in FoodEFSA Journal 2010;8(4):1570Read source → For cadmium, 3 studies on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis reported means and medians from 8.1 µg/kg (EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009) to 18 µg/kg (Grochowska-Niedworok et al. 2020).3Assessment of cadmium and lead content in tomatoes and tomato productsRoczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny (Annals of the National Institute of Hygiene)Read source →8Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain on a request from the European Commission on cadmium in foodThe EFSA JournalRead source →
For a buyer the practical points are the form bought, the basis a result is reported on, where the vegetable juice came from and the laboratory’s reporting limit. Testing finds contamination but does not remove it.
What counts as vegetable juice
This page covers vegetable juice, juice (108 results).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Assessment of cadmium and lead content in tomatoes and tomato productsRoczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny (Annals of the National Institute of Hygiene)Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →5Analytical Results for Lead in Juice Sampled Under the FDA’s Toxic Elements in Food and Foodware, and Radionuclides in Food – Import and Domestic Compliance Program (FY2005-FY2018)FDA analytical results tableRead source →6Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Journal of AOAC InternationalRead source →
Results stay on the basis each source reports: as sold or fresh weight, dry weight, or unstated. Dry-weight, as-sold and unstated results are never pooled, and no moisture conversion is applied.
Heavy metal contamination profile of vegetable juice
The table holds every extracted vegetable juice result: one row for each statistic a source reports for a form, group and metal, 108 rows in all, grouped by metal and form; percentiles, ranges and maxima for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Assessment of cadmium and lead content in tomatoes and tomato productsRoczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny (Annals of the National Institute of Hygiene)Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source →5Analytical Results for Lead in Juice Sampled Under the FDA’s Toxic Elements in Food and Foodware, and Radionuclides in Food – Import and Domestic Compliance Program (FY2005-FY2018)FDA analytical results tableRead source →6Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Journal of AOAC InternationalRead source → Monitoring medians are HMI calculations from individual submissions; non-detects remain intervals between zero and the reporting limit and are never read as zero.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
18 rows can be rated against an HMI reference for the same form and basis, 6 rows have a direct same-study comparison, and the rest stay unrated with the reason recorded.
Comparison methods and scope
Each row is one statistic a source reports for one form of vegetable juice, group and metal; percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Different forms and preparation states are kept apart, and dry-weight results never share a reference with as-sold or fresh-weight results. Ratings place a result against an HMI reference built from monitoring results and ordinary-setting medians for the same form and basis. Same-study contrasts compare a contaminated or treated site with its control, targeted with random sampling, a prepared form with the unprocessed one, or one group of a study with the median of its other groups. Held rows failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.
First displayed analyte: Lead: 36 findings from 7 sources. Each row retains its statistic and measurement basis.
Filter findings
89 of 89 findings · 12 analytes
About this table
| Food form | Collection scope | Finding (µg/kg) | Comparison | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
30 findings · 7 studies · 6 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2019 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2017 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2016 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013–2015 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014–2016 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2000–2017 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2014 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2014 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2007–2008 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceGrochowska-Niedworok et al. 2020 | glass container, PolandCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2018 | FY20162005–2018 | sample value. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 3.7 µg/kg (minimum); 93.9 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | min. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | max. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceDabeka et al. 1995 | Halifax 19861986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceDabeka et al. 1995 | Montreal 19881986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceDabeka et al. 1995 | Ottawa 1985 (preliminary study)1986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceDabeka et al. 1995 | Toronto 19881986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceDabeka et al. 1995 | Vancouver 19871986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceDabeka et al. 1995 | Winnipeg 19871986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Juices, soft drinks and bottled water (aggregate EFSA category),2000–2009Basis not stated | max. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Juices, soft drinks and bottled water (aggregate EFSA category),2000–2009Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Juices, soft drinks and bottled water (aggregate EFSA category),2000–2009Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 0 µg/kg (percentile); 21 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Juices, soft drinks and bottled water (aggregate EFSA category),2000–2009Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Juices, soft drinks and bottled water (aggregate EFSA category),2000–2009Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Juices, soft drinks and bottled water (aggregate EFSA category),2000–2009Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Juices, soft drinks and bottled water (aggregate EFSA category),2000–2009Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 3.2 µg/kg (percentile); 21.8 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Juices, soft drinks and bottled water (aggregate EFSA category),2000–2009Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Juices, soft drinks and bottled water (aggregate EFSA category),2000–2009Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
21 findings · 8 studies · 5 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EMRO2019 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2019 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2006 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2019 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO1999–2018 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | all samples (EU Member States and others, 2003-2007)2003–2007 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | all samples (EU Member States and others, 2003-2007)2003–2007 | mean.Same samples: 31 µg/kg (maximum); 0.5 µg/kg (percentile); 17 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | all samples (EU Member States and others, 2003-2007)2003–2007 | max. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | all samples (EU Member States and others, 2003-2007)2003–2007 | percentile. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | all samples (EU Member States and others, 2003-2007)2003–2007 | percentile. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceGrochowska-Niedworok et al. 2020 | glass container, PolandCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 17.8 µg/kg (minimum); 23.3 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | min. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | max. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEuropean Food Safety Authority 2012 | all samples (EU Member State submissions)2003–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
12 findings · 3 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2023 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2018 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2006–2016 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015–2023 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2019 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2023 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2013–2021 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2012 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean.Same samples: 80 µg/kg (maximum); 20 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | max. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | percentile. | ||
9 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2018–2023 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2016 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2019 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2019 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2020 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2011–2014 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2011–2020 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 | European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2023 | median. | ||
6 findings · 4 studies · 4 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2020 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2017 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceDabeka et al. 2003 | Ottawa composite (retail Oct-Nov 2000)1998–2000 | sample value. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012 | EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012 | EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 20 µg/kg (maximum); 5 µg/kg (percentile); 10 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012 | EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not stated | max. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012 | EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012 | EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2012 | EU occurrence data2004–2011Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
4 findings · 3 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Vegetable juice, juiceFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020 | median. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (LB)2003–2012 | mean.Same samples: 89 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (LB)2003–2012 | percentile. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (UB)2003–2012 | mean.Same samples: 99 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (UB)2003–2012 | percentile. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceDabeka et al. 1995 | Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Vegetable juice, juiceFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020 | median. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Vegetable juice, juiceBassioni et al. 2012 | solution (1), foil immersed in boiling solution 2 hCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Vegetable juice, juiceBassioni et al. 2012 | solution (2), foil immersed in boiling solution 2 hCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Vegetable juice, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010 | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Vegetable juice, juiceFDA Total Diet Study | 1 collection regions2018–2020 | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Vegetable juice, juiceDabeka et al. 1995 | Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
Shared dataset methods and interpretation
Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.
HMI vegetable juice Pb reference · Vegetable juice, juice
Reference and scope
HMI vegetable juice Pb reference · Vegetable juice, juice. Vegetable juice, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1.6 | ≤1.9 | 1.9–4 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1.6 | ≤1.9 | 1.9–4 (bounded) |
78 reference units; 4 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 73 | 25% |
| FDA Total Diet Study | 3 | 25% |
| Grochowska-Niedworok et al. 2020 | 1 | 25% |
| U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2018 | 1 | 25% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for vegetable juice, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
4 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
- WHO GEMS/Food
- FDA Total Diet Study
- Grochowska-Niedworok et al. 2020
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2018
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:vegetable-juice-11c159ee6b75:54f4b030c29b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI vegetable juice Cd reference · Vegetable juice, juice
Reference and scope
HMI vegetable juice Cd reference · Vegetable juice, juice. Vegetable juice, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 8.9 | 8.9–9 (bounded) | 9.68–10.2 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | 8.9 | 9 | 11 |
74 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 70 | 33% |
| FDA Total Diet Study | 3 | 33% |
| EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | 1 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for vegetable juice, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:vegetable-juice-2da34d9a9d27:93efe124b25f
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI vegetable juice tAs reference · Vegetable juice, juice
Reference and scope
HMI vegetable juice tAs reference · Vegetable juice, juice. Vegetable juice, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | ≤1.3 | 1.3–10 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | ≤1.3 | 1.3–9.97 (bounded) |
50 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 47 | 50% |
| FDA Total Diet Study | 3 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for vegetable juice, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:vegetable-juice-aa5f0f5fe8e1:905ccf98b9be
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI vegetable juice iAs reference · Vegetable juice, juice
Reference and scope
HMI vegetable juice iAs reference · Vegetable juice, juice. Vegetable juice, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤2.2 | 2.2–8 (bounded) | 8–12 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤2.2 | 2.2–8 (bounded) | 8–16 (bounded) |
9 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 9 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for vegetable juice, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for vegetable juice, juice on this basis in the completed vegetable juice ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:vegetable-juice-19494600c745:70be5cb4aad6
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI vegetable juice DMA reference · Vegetable juice, juice
Reference and scope
HMI vegetable juice DMA reference · Vegetable juice, juice. Vegetable juice, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for vegetable juice, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for vegetable juice, juice on this basis in the completed vegetable juice ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:vegetable-juice-7eae264eb931:a476f518dc37
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI vegetable juice tHg reference · Vegetable juice, juice
Reference and scope
HMI vegetable juice tHg reference · Vegetable juice, juice. Vegetable juice, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.1 | ≤1 | 0.1–1 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.1 | ≤1 | 0.1–1 (bounded) |
25 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 21 | 33% |
| FDA Total Diet Study | 3 | 33% |
| Dabeka et al. 2003 | 1 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for vegetable juice, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:vegetable-juice-4f4c2ddc6727:c148d72487e9
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI vegetable juice Ni reference · Vegetable juice, juice
Reference and scope
HMI vegetable juice Ni reference · Vegetable juice, juice. Vegetable juice, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤20 | 52 | 65 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤20 | 52 | 65 |
3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 3 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for vegetable juice, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for vegetable juice, juice on this basis in the completed vegetable juice ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:vegetable-juice-30069679619d:e6ee1067e6e3
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI vegetable juice Cr reference · Vegetable juice, juice
Reference and scope
HMI vegetable juice Cr reference · Vegetable juice, juice. Vegetable juice, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤25 | ≤25 | ≤25 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤25 | ≤25 | ≤25 |
3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 3 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for vegetable juice, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for vegetable juice, juice on this basis in the completed vegetable juice ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:vegetable-juice-d643f08957ed:cbf661a8d172
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI vegetable juice Sn reference · Vegetable juice, juice
Reference and scope
HMI vegetable juice Sn reference · Vegetable juice, juice. Vegetable juice, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤10 | ≤10 | ≤10 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤10 | ≤10 | ≤10 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for vegetable juice, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for vegetable juice, juice on this basis in the completed vegetable juice ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:vegetable-juice-4e6dbed75052:57aa2d163416
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI vegetable juice U reference · Vegetable juice, juice
Reference and scope
HMI vegetable juice U reference · Vegetable juice, juice. Vegetable juice, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 3 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for vegetable juice, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for vegetable juice, juice on this basis in the completed vegetable juice ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:vegetable-juice-0006c7ec6ef0:54a96bd2213b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
The source reports only a percentile, range or maximum for these samples, with no mean or median to place against the reference. Spread figures that do have a mean or median are shown on that row instead.
The result is below a reporting limit, and the range from zero to that limit crosses more than one band.
The HMI reference for this form has fewer than four units or no measurable spread, below the display minimum.
The result is on a basis (dry weight, or not stated) that no HMI reference for this form uses, so it cannot be placed.
Reporting limits overlap the study comparison, so no direction can be shown.
No findings match these filters. Change the selection or reset to show all source findings.
How metals reach vegetable juice
No study in the library compared vegetable juice from contaminated and ordinary settings, so the routes by which metals reach it are not measured here.
Which forms and regions measured lower
The HMI reference for lead in vegetable juice, juice pools 78 subgroup units from 4 sampling families, with a median of below 1.9 µg/kg and a middle half spanning below 1.6 (lower quartile) and between 1.9 and 4 µg/kg (upper quartile).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Assessment of cadmium and lead content in tomatoes and tomato productsRoczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny (Annals of the National Institute of Hygiene)Read source →5Analytical Results for Lead in Juice Sampled Under the FDA’s Toxic Elements in Food and Foodware, and Radionuclides in Food – Import and Domestic Compliance Program (FY2005-FY2018)FDA analytical results tableRead source → For cadmium in vegetable juice, juice, the reference median was between 8.9 and 9 µg/kg, with a middle half from 8.9 to between 9.68 and 10.2 µg/kg across 74 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →8Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain on a request from the European Commission on cadmium in foodThe EFSA JournalRead source → For total arsenic in vegetable juice, juice, the reference median was below 1.3 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 1 to between 1.3 and 10 µg/kg across 50 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, vegetable juice, juice had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (1.15 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (6.6 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in EURO (7.52 µg/kg) and the highest in PAHO (11.4 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
In one study, lead across 6 groups of vegetable juice ranged from 3.7 µg/kg (Vancouver 1987) to 93.9 µg/kg (Montreal 1988); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.6Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Journal of AOAC InternationalRead source →
Processing, cooking and preparation
No processing study for metals in this food is in the library yet.
Mitigation for vegetable juice
Lot testing against the applicable limit is the check that can be verified.
No measured way to lower metals in this food is in the library yet.
Trade-offs and limits of controls
Metals do not move together, so a lot that passes a lead limit says little about cadmium, arsenic or nickel unless those are tested as well.
Testing vegetable juice for metals
Results depend on the method and its reporting limit. Reporting limits for lead ranged from 1 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 1,000 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Reporting limits for cadmium ranged from 1 µg/kg (FDA Total Diet Study) to 55.4 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source → Reporting limits for total arsenic ranged from 1 µg/kg (FDA Total Diet Study) to 10,000 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →
A useful lot result names the form, the basis and a quantification limit well below the limit that applies.
Buying and verifying vegetable juice
No maximum level for metals in vegetable juice was verified from primary text for this page; buyers should confirm the limit that applies in the destination market.
Exposure from vegetable juice
No source in the library converted vegetable juice concentrations into a verified estimate of intake for a defined population. Concentrations describe the food, not individual risk.
Evidence review and remaining gaps
Every source record that names vegetable juice was decided on its content: 16 occurrence extracted, 16 records in all. The occurrence table renders every extracted result; held values remain visible with their reason.
References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.
Vegetable juice FAQs
What heavy metals are found in vegetable juice?
The library reports lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, uranium and Co in vegetable juice, most often lead, cadmium and total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Assessment of cadmium and lead content in tomatoes and tomato productsRoczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny (Annals of the National Institute of Hygiene)Read source →4Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in vegetable juice, juice from 869 results in 4 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 1.15 to 6.6 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Which regions report the lowest levels in vegetable juice?
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, vegetable juice, juice had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (1.15 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (6.6 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in EURO (7.52 µg/kg) and the highest in PAHO (11.4 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
How much of the arsenic in vegetable juice is inorganic?
Inorganic arsenic, the more toxic form, was measured in 9 results from 2 sources, far fewer than total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →9Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597Read source → European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 reported inorganic arsenic at 4.4 µg/kg (mean) in vegetable juice, juice from European dietary-survey occurrence data.9Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597Read source →
References
Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.
- GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsDataset
- FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsDataset
- Assessment of cadmium and lead content in tomatoes and tomato productsPeer-reviewed
- Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Peer-reviewed
- Analytical Results for Lead in Juice Sampled Under the FDA’s Toxic Elements in Food and Foodware, and Radionuclides in Food – Import and Domestic Compliance Program (FY2005-FY2018)Dataset
- Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Peer-reviewed
- Scientific Opinion on Lead in FoodGovernment
- Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain on a request from the European Commission on cadmium in foodGovernment
- Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationGovernment
Sources
Browse Vegetable juice Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.
Update history
22 October 2026: Rebuilt from every vegetable juice record in the library: 16 occurrence sources, references by form and basis, same-study contrasts.
