Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index
Unmarked glass laboratory vessels, a closed notebook, sampling spoon and empty specimen dish illustrating Serb and colleagues 2024 source research context.

Mass-Spectrometry-Based Research of Cosmetic Ingredients

This review from Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy (Timisoara, Romania) covers mass spectrometry (MS)-based analytical methods for characterizing cosmetic ingredients, including bioconjugates, preservatives, dyes, allergens, fragrances, and heavy metals, across leave-on and rinse-off product matrices. For heavy metals, the review synthesizes peer-reviewed literature (references 218-228, citing Grosser et al. 2228 and others) and compiles EU/Germany and US regulatory limits in Table 6. It is a secondary review source; it does not report any primary measured concentrations.

Overview

This source page corrects an earlier bulk-ingest routing that erroneously assigned this paper to fish, shellfish, baby sunscreen, and seaweed product categories. Those routings were incorrect: the paper is a cosmetics-only MS methods review. The correct product scope is cosmetic personal care leave-on products (nail polish, face/skin care, foundation/powders/blush) for which heavy metals appear as contaminants or impurities.

Key numbers

Regulatory limits for heavy metals in cosmetic products (Table 6, Serb et al. 2024, citing EU/Germany and USA sources):

MetalLimit for cosmetics (EU, Germany)Limit for cosmetics (USA)
Mercury (Hg)0.1 ppm1 ppm (colorants)
Lead (Pb)2 ppm20 ppm (colorants); 10 ppm (lipsticks, lip glosses)
Cadmium (Cd)0.1 ppmn/a
Arsenic (As)0.5 ppm3 ppm (colorants)
Nickel (Ni)10 ppmn/a
Chromium (Cr)n/an/a
Antimony (Sb)0.5 ppmn/a
Cobalt (Co)n/an/a

Note: values reproduced from Table 6 of the review; ppm = parts per million (mg/kg). “n/a” indicates no limit stated in that jurisdiction column in the source table.

Heavy metals identified as contaminants in cosmetic products by product type (Table 5, Serb et al. 2024):

  • Mercury (Hg): creams (antiseptic, skin-lightening) and some mascaras
  • Lead (Pb): lipsticks, eyeliners, lip glosses, and hair dyes
  • Cadmium (Cd): blush, eyeshadow, and face powders
  • Arsenic (As): eyeshadow and face powders
  • Nickel (Ni): foundations, eyeshadow, and mascaras
  • Chromium (Cr): eyeshadow, lipsticks, and face powders
  • Aluminum (Al): foundations, eyeshadow, and mascaras
  • Copper (Cu): blush, eyeshadow, and some lipsticks
  • Antimony (Sb): blush, eyeshadow, and mascara
  • Zinc (Zn): foundations, sunscreens, and face powders
  • Manganese (Mn): eyeshadow, blush, and some lipsticks
  • Cobalt (Co): hair dyes and some eyeshadows
  • Selenium (Se): hair dyes and some face powders
  • Barium (Ba): blush, eyeshadow, and face powders
  • Beryllium (Be): eyeshadow and face powders
  • Thallium (Tl): hair dyes and some face powders

The ICP-MS section (Section 3.5) of the review notes that heavy metals in cosmetics are present as contaminants from impurities in raw materials or the manufacturing process. Grosser et al. [228] is cited as showing that Pb, As, Cd, Hg, Cr, and Sb levels in lipsticks, nail polishes, and skin creams can be determined by ICP-MS after microwave digestion. All cited values in this paper are secondary (compiled from other studies); no primary measurements were conducted.

Methods (brief)

Literature review of publications 1992-2024 from PubMed and Web of Science. Search terms included “mass spectrometry” combined with “preservatives,” “colorants,” “allergens,” “metals,” and “cosmetic ingredients.” Only peer-reviewed articles in English with full texts available were included. Duplicate removal and qualitative/quantitative evaluation of articles by title, keywords, abstract, year, and main text. 48 pages, 276 references.

Evidence fitness

This review provides a secondary compilation of heavy metal limits and product associations for cosmetic products. It does not provide measured concentrations from primary surveys; for primary measurement data, see Bashir et al. 2025 (nail polish, beauty creams, lipsticks sampled in Pakistan) and Karimi et al. 2015 (nail polishes, Iran). Table 6 of this review is a useful regulatory limit reference for EU/Germany and USA jurisdictions, clearly distinguishing colorant-specific limits from general cosmetic limits for lead and arsenic. The paper’s earlier routing to fish, shellfish, baby sunscreen, and seaweed was an error; this correction routes it to cosmetic product categories.

Limitations

Secondary source only; all heavy metal data are compiled from cited primary studies rather than measured in this paper. Table 6 does not cite the specific regulatory instruments for each limit, making independent verification necessary. No primary concentration measurements are available in this source.

Update history

No substantive edit history is available in this build. The full commit record is available in git.