Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Makeup — foundation, powders, blush/rouge

This page reports published measurements and their limitations. Compare values only when the product form, measurement basis, and metal species match.

17 related source records are associated with this category. This is a coverage count, not a measure of scientific confidence. References identify works cited in the text.

Overview

This page is a scaffolded entry for HMTc Taxonomy v2.0 Category 13 (Cosmetics and Personal Care — Leave-on), Row 5: Makeup — foundation, powders, blush/rouge. Studies for this row are still being read. Where a section is empty, the row has not yet accumulated contributing sources of the required kind.

Literature scope

The Heavy Metal Index source corpus is currently focused on food and food-contact materials. This page documents an HMTc Taxonomy v2.0 row in the category Cosmetics and Personal Care — Leave-on for which no peer-reviewed primary or government sources have yet been ingested. The page exists as the routing destination for future ingest. Until sources land, the literature-evidence sections below are deliberately empty rather than guessed; HMTc certification thresholds for products in this row continue to be developed under the certification program at heavymetalcertified.com, not on this public page.

Reading guide

Legal, regulatory and retailer teams can use the cited measurements, applicable limits and study limitations to assess the evidence for this category.

Quality teams can examine product form, measurement basis and sources of variation. Journalists and researchers can follow each reference to the original findings and methods.

Related tools and pages: heavymetalcertified.com · methodology

Evidence summary

Sources for this row will be listed here once they are catalogued.

Source Evidence Inventory

Sources for this row will be listed here once they are catalogued.

Supporting evidence and scope

Broader-scope sources for this row will be listed here when they are catalogued.

Federal/Regulatory Limits vs Field Findings

Regulatory limits for this row will be listed here once they are catalogued.

Controls and mitigation

Practical interventions to reduce heavy-metal load in this row, ordered by impact magnitude. Each lever names the magnitude of the effect with a cited source; cross-links to dedicated Mitigation pages where they exist.

How standards math uses this page

HMT&C certification thresholds for this row are developed under the certification program at heavymetalcertified.com, not on this page. The row-standard for this row is an aggregate computed from the contributing source pool in the row’s native finished-product basis; it is not a per-source decoration of any single value cited on this page. This public page reports literature evidence only.

Historical recalls and enforcement

Public regulatory events for this row, such as recalls and import alerts, will be listed here as they are catalogued.

Methodology

This page reports what the cited sources say about heavy-metal concentrations in makeup — foundation, powders, blush/rouge. Speciation is non-substitutable (iAs vs tAs, MeHg vs tHg, Cr-VI vs total Cr). Basis is preserved (finished-product as sold unless the source specifies otherwise; see each row for the basis label). Non-detect handling follows each source’s reporting convention. Pooling is avoided across LOD/LOQ, period, geography, and analytical-basis differences. HMT&C certification thresholds for products in this row are developed under the certification program at heavymetalcertified.com, not on this page; this public page reports literature evidence only.

The applicable regulatory jurisdictions for this row are: FDA cosmetics, EU Cosmetics Regulation 1223/2009.

Sources

Sources for this row will be listed here once they are catalogued.

Sources

Source records associated with this topic. Inclusion does not establish that every finding applies to this product or ingredient. References above identify works cited in the text.

#CitationYearTypeUsed on this page for
1Yorgwara et al. 2026. Assessment of Heavy Metal Concentration in Some Selected Cosmetic Products and Human Health Risk in Eleme LGA, Rivers State, Nigeria, Research Journal of Pure Science and Technology 9(2):20-372026Peer-reviewedNG Pb, Cd, Cr, tAs, tHg, Co occurrence in Twenty-six cosmetic and personal-care products purchased from cosmetic stores and markets in Eleme LGA, Rivers State, Nigeria, grouped… (n=26)
2Alblooshi 2025. The impact of perfumes and cosmetic products on human health: a narrative review, Frontiers in Toxicology 7:1646075 (Frontiers in Toxicology; published 29 August 2025; corrected 16 December 2025)2025ReviewUS/EU/CA Pb, Cd, tHg, tAs, Ni, Cr, Cr-VI occurrence in Single-author narrative review compiling peer-reviewed literature published 2005–2025 on health impacts of perfumes and cosmetic products. Sources drawn…
3Haji et al. 2025. Hidden Toxic Elements in Creams and Foundations, Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences 6(2): 197-2032025Peer-reviewedTZ Cu, Cd, tHg, Pb, tAs, Sb, Te, Bi, Nb, Ta occurrence in Seven creams and three foundation products assessed for toxic elements; the paper reports individual brand names, but this… (n=10)
4Kicińska et al. 2025. Health risks from heavy metals in cosmetic products available in the online consumer market, Scientific Reports 15: 3162025Peer-reviewedPL/EU/US Cr, Fe, Mn, Ni, Zn occurrence in 23 cosmetic products purchased from the online consumer market: 4 foundations, 4 blushes, 4 lipsticks, 4 face creams,… (n=23)
5Moriceau et al. 2025. Measurement of traces of heavy metals in cosmetic raw materials and finished products according to ISO/DIS 21392:2021 using triple quadrupole ICP-MS, Thermo Fisher Scientific Application Note 0036022025IndustryEU/FR Pb, Cd, tAs, tHg, Cr, Ni, Sb, Al, Sn, Co, Mn, Fe, Zn, Be, Se, Tl, Ti, W, Pt occurrence in 17 finished cosmetic products sold on the French and European market (creams, gels, pastes, liquids, varnishes, solids) plus… (n=27)
6Ali et al. 2024. The Health Risk Assessment of Some Toxic Metals in Some Commonly Demand Facial Cosmetics in Benghazi-Libya Markets During 2022, Advanced Journal of Chemistry-Section B: Natural Products and Medical Chemistry 6(2):127-1362024Peer-reviewedLY Cr, Fe, Ni, Pb, Cd occurrence in Eighteen facial cosmetic products sold in Benghazi, Libya cosmetic shops in 2022: six lipsticks, six mascaras, and six… (n=18)
7Tuladhar et al. 2024. Chemicals in Cosmetics Used by Washington Residents: Phase Two Results — Report to the Legislature Pursuant to ESSB 5693 (2022) Section 302 (56), Washington State Department of Ecology, Publication 24-04-022 (May 2024)2024Government reportThis is the Washington State Department of Ecology legislative report’s Phase 2 deliverable under ESSB 5693 (2022) Section 302(56), the…
8Washington State Department of 2024. Policy Statement: Interim Policy on Lead in Cosmetics — enforcement discretion under the Washington Toxic-Free Cosmetics Act (Chapter 70A.560 RCW), Washington State Department of Ecology, Publication 24-04-036 (issued December 19, 2024; minor revisions and clarifications January 15, 2025)2024Government reportUS-WA Pb occurrence in Regulatory enforcement-discretion policy issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology under authority of the Toxic-Free Cosmetics Act…
9Axford et al. 2023. A Feasibility Study Investigating Action Limits for Certain Heavy Metal Impurities in Cosmetic Products, UK Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS), BEIS/OPSS Contract Ref FM21190; report prepared by LGC2023Government reportUK/EU/US Sb, tAs, Cd, Pb, tHg occurrence in 91 cosmetic products purchased from UK high-street stores and online retailers (~70/30 split) across low, mid and high… (n=91)
10Washington State Department of 2023. Chemicals in Cosmetics Used by Washington Residents — Report to the Legislature Pursuant to ESSB 5693 (2022) Section 302 (56), Washington State Department of Ecology, Publication 23-04-007 (January 2023)2023Government reportUS/EU/DE Pb, Cd, tAs occurrence in 50 unique low-cost cosmetic products purchased July 2022 from four Puget Sound area retail chains (33 Walmart, 4… (n=50)
11Almukainzi et al. 2022. Quality and safety investigation of commonly used topical cosmetic preparations, Scientific Reports 12:182992022Peer-reviewedSA/US/EU Pb, Cd, tAs, Al, Cr, Cu, Ni, Fe, Zn, Mn, Co occurrence in Twenty-one topical cosmetic products purchased from local markets and drug stores in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Product selection was… (n=21)
12Aldayel et al. 2018. Heavy Metals Concentration in Facial Cosmetics, Natural Products Chemistry & Research 6(1): 10003032018Peer-reviewedSA Pb, Cd, tAs, tHg, Al, Cr, Ni, Sn, Sb, U, Cu, Zn, Fe, Mn, Co, Ag, Ba, V, Mo, Li occurrence in Thirty facial-cosmetic samples representing nine ‘most expensive’ facial-cosmetic brands purchased from the Saudi Arabian (Riyadh) market. Four product… (n=30)
13Zafarzadeh et al. 2018. Assessment of cadmium and lead concentrations in different types of cosmetics products consumed in Iran, National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 8(8):1200-12042018Peer-reviewedIR/CN/TR Cd, Pb occurrence in 264 cosmetic products purchased from shops in Gorgan, Iran from September 2016 to March 2017: 24 samples each… (n=264)
14Omenka et al. 2016. Heavy metal content of selected personal care products (PCPs) available in Ibadan, Nigeria and their toxic effects, Toxicology Reports 3:628-6352016Peer-reviewedNG Zn, Cd, Pb, Ni occurrence in Thirty-five sealed personal care products bought in six major markets in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria: 20 body creams… (n=35)
15Hepp et al. 2014. Survey of cosmetics for arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, mercury, and nickel content, Journal of Cosmetic Science 65: 125-145 (May/June 2014)2014Peer-reviewedUS tAs, Cd, Cr, Co, Pb, tHg, Ni occurrence in 150 cosmetic products of 12 types sold on the U.S. market, purchased April 22 - August 16, 2011… (n=150)
16U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011. Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition — Chapter 17, Consumer Products, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-09/052F2011Government reportChapter 17 of the U.S. EPA’s 2011 Exposure Factors Handbook (EFH) compiles consumer-product use and exposure data — frequency of…
17European Chemical Industry Ecology 1992. Nickel, Cobalt and Chromium in Consumer Products: Allergic Contact Dermatitis, ECETOC Technical Report No. 45, Brussels, March 1992 (ISSN 0773-8072-45)1992IndustryEU/US/IL Ni, Co, Cr, Cr-VI occurrence in Literature-review compilation of nickel, cobalt and chromium concentrations measured in consumer products by 28 published studies (1956-1990) and…

Update history

No substantive edit history is available in this build. The full commit record is available in git.