Peach in the HMI library has 283 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ba and Mo from 21 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadHealthy Babies Bright FuturesRead source →4Occurrence and health risk assessment of antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, and lead in fresh fruits consumed in South KoreaApplied Biological ChemistryRead source →5Analytical Results for Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury in Food Intended for Babies and Young Children - TEP (FY2009-FY2024)FDA analytical results tableRead source →6Determination and assessments of selected heavy metals in eye shadow cosmeticsMicrochemical JournalRead source →
-
Metals measured:
Lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid and total mercury and others, in 283 results from 21 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadHealthy Babies Bright FuturesRead source →4Occurrence and health risk assessment of antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, and lead in fresh fruits consumed in South KoreaApplied Biological ChemistryRead source →
-
Main drivers:
Form, basis and where the peach was sampled; reporting limits decide how many results are non-detects.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadHealthy Babies Bright FuturesRead source →4Occurrence and health risk assessment of antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, and lead in fresh fruits consumed in South KoreaApplied Biological ChemistryRead source →
-
Practical framing:
Ask for lot results with a quantification limit well below the limit that applies in the destination market.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadHealthy Babies Bright FuturesRead source →4Occurrence and health risk assessment of antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, and lead in fresh fruits consumed in South KoreaApplied Biological ChemistryRead source →
Peach overview
Peach in the HMI library has 283 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ba and Mo from 21 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadHealthy Babies Bright FuturesRead source →4Occurrence and health risk assessment of antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, and lead in fresh fruits consumed in South KoreaApplied Biological ChemistryRead source →5Analytical Results for Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury in Food Intended for Babies and Young Children - TEP (FY2009-FY2024)FDA analytical results tableRead source →6Determination and assessments of selected heavy metals in eye shadow cosmeticsMicrochemical JournalRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in peach, as sold from 2,188 results in 4 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 2.4 to 720 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In the US Total Diet Study, peach, frozen had a median lead result below 4 µg/kg across 27 composites from 2017–2020.2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →
Across 2 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported lead means and medians on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis ranged from 41.2 µg/kg (Lee et al. 2023) to 2,750 µg/kg (Volpe et al. 2012).4Occurrence and health risk assessment of antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, and lead in fresh fruits consumed in South KoreaApplied Biological ChemistryRead source →6Determination and assessments of selected heavy metals in eye shadow cosmeticsMicrochemical JournalRead source → For cadmium, 2 studies on a dry-weight basis reported means and medians from 20 µg/kg (Elbagermi et al. 2012) to 50.7 µg/kg (Rahim et al. 2020).7Monitoring of Heavy Metal Content in Fruits and Vegetables Collected from Production and Market Sites in the Misurata Area of LibyaISRN Analytical ChemistryRead source →8Analysis of Toxic Heavy Metal Content of the Most Widely Consumed FruitsJournal of Physical ScienceRead source →
For a buyer the practical points are the form bought, the basis a result is reported on, where the peach came from and the laboratory’s reporting limit. Testing finds contamination but does not remove it.
What counts as peach
This page covers peach in 6 forms kept separate in every comparison: peach, as sold (217 results), peach, canned (30 results), peach, juice (15 results), peach, dried (7 results), peach, frozen (7 results) and peach, peel or outer layer (7 results).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadHealthy Babies Bright FuturesRead source →4Occurrence and health risk assessment of antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, and lead in fresh fruits consumed in South KoreaApplied Biological ChemistryRead source →5Analytical Results for Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury in Food Intended for Babies and Young Children - TEP (FY2009-FY2024)FDA analytical results tableRead source →6Determination and assessments of selected heavy metals in eye shadow cosmeticsMicrochemical JournalRead source →
Results stay on the basis each source reports: as sold or fresh weight, dry weight, or unstated. Dry-weight, as-sold and unstated results are never pooled, and no moisture conversion is applied.
Heavy metal contamination profile of peach
The table holds every extracted peach result: one row for each statistic a source reports for a form, group and metal, 283 rows in all, grouped by metal and form; percentiles, ranges and maxima for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadHealthy Babies Bright FuturesRead source →4Occurrence and health risk assessment of antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, and lead in fresh fruits consumed in South KoreaApplied Biological ChemistryRead source →5Analytical Results for Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury in Food Intended for Babies and Young Children - TEP (FY2009-FY2024)FDA analytical results tableRead source →6Determination and assessments of selected heavy metals in eye shadow cosmeticsMicrochemical JournalRead source → Monitoring medians are HMI calculations from individual submissions; non-detects remain intervals between zero and the reporting limit and are never read as zero.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
51 rows can be rated against an HMI reference for the same form and basis, 23 rows have a direct same-study comparison, and the rest stay unrated with the reason recorded. 39 values from 2 sources failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.8Analysis of Toxic Heavy Metal Content of the Most Widely Consumed FruitsJournal of Physical ScienceRead source →9Essential elements in the different type of fruits, soil and water samples collected from Markazi province, Iran: a health risk assessment studyQuality Assurance and Safety of Crops & FoodsRead source →
Comparison methods and scope
Each row is one statistic a source reports for one form of peach, group and metal; percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Different forms and preparation states are kept apart, and dry-weight results never share a reference with as-sold or fresh-weight results. Ratings place a result against an HMI reference built from monitoring results and ordinary-setting medians for the same form and basis. Same-study contrasts compare a contaminated or treated site with its control, targeted with random sampling, a prepared form with the unprocessed one, or one group of a study with the median of its other groups. Held rows failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.
First displayed analyte: Lead: 75 findings from 16 sources. Each row retains its statistic and measurement basis.
Filter findings
275 of 275 findings · 21 analytes
About this table
| Food form | Collection scope | Finding (µg/kg) | Comparison | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
55 findings · 13 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015–2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2006–2010As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2012–2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013–2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2000–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2000–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014–2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2006–2010As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2000–2005As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2013–2015As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2012As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2007–2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2015As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2012As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2010As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldHoulihan et al. 2019 | Fruit - single; single product sample #78; purchased Gambell, AK2019As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldLee et al. 2023 | all samples2019As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Fruits, FY20182009–2024As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Fruits, FY20182009–2024As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Fruits, FY20182009–2024As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Fruits, FY20232009–2024As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Grain-Based Snacks, FY20182009–2024As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldVolpe et al. 2012 | powder eye shadow made in USA (sample 18, peach)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldVolpe et al. 2012 | powder eye shadow made in USA (sample 19, brilliant peach)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2016Dry weight | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012 | all samples2010Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldNisa et al. 2020 | local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldRahim et al. 2020 | 28 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa fruit marketsCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 5.7 µg/kg (minimum); 89.6 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Peach, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | min. | ||
| Peach, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | max. | ||
| Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016 | main producing areas of China2014Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016 | main producing areas of China2014Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016 | main producing areas of China2014Basis not stated | other. | ||
| Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldZhang et al. 2021 | single marketed sample, Shandong2019Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
10 findings · 2 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Malaysia origin, 16.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Thailand origin, 19.3% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 55.5 µg/kg (minimum); 196 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | min. | ||
| Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | max. | ||
| Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | Halifax 19861986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | Montreal 19881986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | Ottawa 1985 (preliminary study)1986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | Toronto 19881986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | Vancouver 19871986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | Winnipeg 19871986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2011–2012As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, driedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, frozenFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020 | local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
40 findings · 12 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EMRO2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015–2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2006–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2006As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2006As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO1999–2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2010As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldHoulihan et al. 2019 | Fruit - single; single product sample #78; purchased Gambell, AK2019As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldLee et al. 2023 | all samples2019As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Fruits, FY20182009–2024As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Fruits, FY20182009–2024As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Fruits, FY20182009–2024As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Grain-Based Snacks, FY20182009–2024As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldVolpe et al. 2012 | powder eye shadow made in USA (sample 18, peach)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldVolpe et al. 2012 | powder eye shadow made in USA (sample 19, brilliant peach)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012 | all samples2010Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldNisa et al. 2020 | local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldRahim et al. 2020 | 28 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa fruit marketsCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Peach, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 1.38 µg/kg (minimum); 4.88 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Peach, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | min. | ||
| Peach, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | max. | ||
| Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016 | main producing areas of China2014Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016 | main producing areas of China2014Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016 | main producing areas of China2014Basis not stated | other. | ||
| Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
4 findings · 2 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Malaysia origin, 16.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Thailand origin, 19.3% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 1.18 µg/kg (minimum); 14.5 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | min. | ||
| Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | 5 city composites1986–1988Basis not stated | max. | ||
3 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, juiceJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, driedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, frozenFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020 | local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
20 findings · 5 studies | ||||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2014–2021As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2010–2015As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2015As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2002–2012As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2009As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2015As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldHoulihan et al. 2019 | Fruit - single; single product sample #78; purchased Gambell, AK2019As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldLee et al. 2023 | all samples2019As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Fruits, FY20182009–2024As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Fruits, FY20182009–2024As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Fruits, FY20182009–2024As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Grain-Based Snacks, FY20182009–2024As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
4 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2014–2023As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, frozenFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
6 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2012–2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2011–2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2011–2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012 | all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017–2021As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2022As sold / fresh | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
12 findings · 5 studies | ||||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2015As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2004As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldDabeka et al. 2003 | Ottawa composite (retail Oct-Nov 2000)1998–2000As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldDabeka et al. 2003 | Whitehorse composite (retail Jan-Feb 1998)1998–2000As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Peach, as soldHoulihan et al. 2019 | Fruit - single; single product sample #78; purchased Gambell, AK2019As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Fruits, FY20182009–2024As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Peach, as soldZhang et al. 2021 | single marketed sample, Shandong2019Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, frozenFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
13 findings · 9 studies | ||||
| Peach, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (LB)2003–2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (UB)2003–2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldLee et al. 2023 | all samples2019As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldVolpe et al. 2012 | powder eye shadow made in USA (sample 18, peach)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldVolpe et al. 2012 | powder eye shadow made in USA (sample 19, brilliant peach)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012 | all samples2010Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldNisa et al. 2020 | local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldRahim et al. 2020 | 28 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa fruit marketsCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016 | main producing areas of China2014Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016 | main producing areas of China2014Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016 | main producing areas of China2014Basis not stated | other. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, driedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, frozenFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020 | local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
14 findings · 5 studies | ||||
| Peach, as soldLee et al. 2023 | all samples2019As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldVolpe et al. 2012 | powder eye shadow made in USA (sample 18, peach)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldVolpe et al. 2012 | powder eye shadow made in USA (sample 19, brilliant peach)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRahim et al. 2020 | 28 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa fruit marketsCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | all six sitesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Delijan, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Khomein, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Khondab, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Mahallat, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Saveh, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Tafresh, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016 | main producing areas of China2014Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016 | main producing areas of China2014Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016 | main producing areas of China2014Basis not stated | other. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, driedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, frozenFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
5 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
5 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2015As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Peach, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
2 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Peach, as soldLee et al. 2023 | all samples2019As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, frozenFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
6 findings · 5 studies | ||||
| Peach, as soldVolpe et al. 2012 | powder eye shadow made in USA (sample 18, peach)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldVolpe et al. 2012 | powder eye shadow made in USA (sample 19, brilliant peach)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012 | all samples2010Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldNisa et al. 2020 | local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldRahim et al. 2020 | 28 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa fruit marketsCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldDabeka et al. 1995 | Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
3 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Malaysia origin, 16.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Thailand origin, 19.3% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995 | Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, driedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020 | local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
9 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Peach, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012 | all samples2010Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldNisa et al. 2020 | local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | all six sitesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Delijan, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Khomein, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Khondab, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Mahallat, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Saveh, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Tafresh, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Malaysia origin, 16.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Thailand origin, 19.3% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020 | local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
8 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Peach, as soldNisa et al. 2020 | local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | all six sitesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Delijan, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Khomein, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Khondab, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Mahallat, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Saveh, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Tafresh, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Malaysia origin, 16.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Thailand origin, 19.3% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020 | local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
8 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Peach, as soldNisa et al. 2020 | local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | all six sitesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Delijan, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Khomein, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Khondab, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Mahallat, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Saveh, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Tafresh, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Malaysia origin, 16.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Thailand origin, 19.3% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020 | local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
8 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Peach, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012 | all samples2010Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | all six sitesCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Delijan, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Khomein, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Khondab, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Mahallat, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Saveh, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020 | Tafresh, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Malaysia origin, 16.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025 | Thailand origin, 19.3% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, driedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, as soldLee et al. 2023 | all samples2019As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Peach, driedAkçay et al. 2023 | market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
Shared dataset methods and interpretation
Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.
HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, as sold. Peach, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1.8–2.4 (bounded) | 2.4–4.3 (bounded) | 4.5–7.4 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | 0.9–2.4 (bounded) | 2.4–3.5 (bounded) | 7.4 |
157 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 151 | 33% |
| Houlihan et al. 2019 | 1 | 33% |
| U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | 5 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-2a9c5f477b34:b7ec6875301e
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight. Peach, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 50 | 437 | 824 |
| Alternative weighting | 50 | 437 | 824 |
2 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 50% |
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-9dc50be25f6a:2b5ce02edc81
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, canned, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, canned, dry weight. Peach, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 2200 | 3200 | 4200 |
| Alternative weighting | 2200 | 3200 | 4200 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Alsabagh 2025 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, canned on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-98fa043a7936:52fbbe2de658
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, juice
Reference and scope
HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, juice. Peach, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 3.42–3.67 (bounded) | 12.5 | 22.9 |
| Alternative weighting | 3.42–3.67 (bounded) | 12.5 | 22.9 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for peach, juice on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-1e4be78b349c:6abaa76f4aa5
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, frozen. Peach, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤4 | ≤4 | ≤4 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤4 | ≤4 | ≤4 |
27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for peach, frozen on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-e2e74e4a70fa:f6146cc2878f
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Peach, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 135 | 135 | 135 |
| Alternative weighting | 135 | 135 | 135 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-e71939fee652:c0ab4e2e3ab8
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Cd reference · Peach, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI peach Cd reference · Peach, as sold. Peach, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1.45–2 (bounded) | 2.1 | 2.3 |
| Alternative weighting | 1.3–2 (bounded) | 2.1 | 2.3–3 (bounded) |
126 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 122 | 33% |
| Houlihan et al. 2019 | 1 | 33% |
| U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | 3 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-f29c3d7d9d29:08ae5f58a6fa
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Cd reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI peach Cd reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight. Peach, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 106 | 106 | 106 |
| Alternative weighting | 106 | 106 | 106 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, as sold on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-c8485268caff:47dbf6fcbacb
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Cd reference · Peach, juice
Reference and scope
HMI peach Cd reference · Peach, juice. Peach, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤2 | ≤3.5 | ≤5 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤2 | ≤3.5 | ≤5 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for peach, juice on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-c10cdbb61c6e:8541b2604daa
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Cd reference · Peach, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI peach Cd reference · Peach, frozen. Peach, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | ≤1 | 1.2 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | ≤1 | 1.1 |
27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for peach, frozen on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-9c543fe43691:9da8d9933830
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Cd reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI peach Cd reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Peach, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 105 | 105 | 105 |
| Alternative weighting | 105 | 105 | 105 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-427a608da6a8:de6cc703704b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach tAs reference · Peach, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI peach tAs reference · Peach, as sold. Peach, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤4.9 | 4.9–7.3 (bounded) | 7.3–15 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | 0.79–5 (bounded) | 7.3 | 7.3–20 (bounded) |
39 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 35 | 33% |
| Houlihan et al. 2019 | 1 | 33% |
| U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | 3 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-3d7d94fffdbd:d23d9602587a
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach tAs reference · Peach, juice
Reference and scope
HMI peach tAs reference · Peach, juice. Peach, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤7 | ≤11.9 | ≤20 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤5 | ≤11 | ≤20 |
13 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 13 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for peach, juice on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-3956e15f2a26:e0ed788f9ccf
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach tAs reference · Peach, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI peach tAs reference · Peach, frozen. Peach, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤3 | 3.6 | 5.8 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤3 | 3.5 | 5.8 |
27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for peach, frozen on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-9f393b9c0f45:ca14c1713b55
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach iAs reference · Peach, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI peach iAs reference · Peach, as sold. Peach, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.66 | ≤0.66 | 0.345–3 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.66 | ≤0.667 | 0.172–3 (bounded) |
10 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 10 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for peach, as sold on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-ca90129ca9f5:a2869b94a8bd
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach iAs reference · Peach, juice
Reference and scope
HMI peach iAs reference · Peach, juice. Peach, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
6 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 6 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for peach, juice on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-7ae542b53be8:15d9d5fef127
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach DMA reference · Peach, juice
Reference and scope
HMI peach DMA reference · Peach, juice. Peach, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for peach, juice on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-b5cc0788a457:5c5a53b2115f
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach tHg reference · Peach, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI peach tHg reference · Peach, as sold. Peach, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.05 | 0.05–0.142 (bounded) | 0.142–0.255 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.05 | 0.13–0.142 (bounded) | 0.142–0.21 (bounded) |
33 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 30 | 33% |
| Dabeka et al. 2003 | 2 | 33% |
| Houlihan et al. 2019 | 1 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-59a9afe350ec:62e09675fe0c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach tHg reference · Peach, juice
Reference and scope
HMI peach tHg reference · Peach, juice. Peach, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤5 | ≤5 | ≤5 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤5 | ≤5 | ≤5 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for peach, juice on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-0230a1e6414b:2bb0659ec835
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach tHg reference · Peach, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI peach tHg reference · Peach, frozen. Peach, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for peach, frozen on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-872607afd11c:2f52903fe59e
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Ni reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI peach Ni reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight. Peach, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 205 | 205 | 205 |
| Alternative weighting | 205 | 205 | 205 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, as sold on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-1c51995d7987:e57f8491ea61
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Ni reference · Peach, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI peach Ni reference · Peach, frozen. Peach, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤40 | 57 | 72 |
| Alternative weighting | 47 | 57 | 72 |
27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for peach, frozen on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-ad547b781432:725bab6c56b1
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Ni reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI peach Ni reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Peach, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 159 | 159 | 159 |
| Alternative weighting | 159 | 159 | 159 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-baf2376795fb:e5c78a8cc36e
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Cr reference · Peach, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI peach Cr reference · Peach, frozen. Peach, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for peach, frozen on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-7f26013ae18c:8cf099ce7a0d
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Al reference · Peach, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI peach Al reference · Peach, as sold. Peach, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 749 | 1230 | 1720 |
| Alternative weighting | 749 | 1230 | 1720 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for peach, as sold on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-06b3e0643fbb:33d884a2a726
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Sn reference · Peach, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI peach Sn reference · Peach, as sold. Peach, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 8.5–9.25 (bounded) | 12500 | 27800 |
| Alternative weighting | 8.5–9.25 (bounded) | 12500 | 27800 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for peach, as sold on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-8a3612547c12:da11041fc03b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach U reference · Peach, frozen
Reference and scope
HMI peach U reference · Peach, frozen. Peach, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for peach, frozen on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-f9e0cb229f38:dd0c9f981b5b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Co reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI peach Co reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight. Peach, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 370 | 370 | 370 |
| Alternative weighting | 370 | 370 | 370 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, as sold on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-4a6fbd709691:77753c098e20
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Co reference · Peach, canned, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI peach Co reference · Peach, canned, dry weight. Peach, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Alternative weighting | 100 | 100 | 100 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Alsabagh 2025 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, canned on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-97dea01c286a:85c959cdc581
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Co reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI peach Co reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Peach, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 391 | 391 | 391 |
| Alternative weighting | 391 | 391 | 391 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-f074b4c2ec91:2120815f2186
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Cu reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI peach Cu reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight. Peach, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 394 | 394 | 394 |
| Alternative weighting | 394 | 394 | 394 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, as sold on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-14f706b0666b:69f87ea33b7b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Cu reference · Peach, canned, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI peach Cu reference · Peach, canned, dry weight. Peach, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 5800 | 11400 | 17000 |
| Alternative weighting | 5800 | 11400 | 17000 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Alsabagh 2025 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, canned on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-cf45f7f9d3f8:f2a12752dd4b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Cu reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI peach Cu reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Peach, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 556 | 556 | 556 |
| Alternative weighting | 556 | 556 | 556 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-106e932f64cf:ebea59820286
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Fe reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI peach Fe reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight. Peach, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 4740 | 4740 | 4740 |
| Alternative weighting | 4740 | 4740 | 4740 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, as sold on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-3d814805843b:f6443cf5093d
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Fe reference · Peach, canned, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI peach Fe reference · Peach, canned, dry weight. Peach, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 12800 | 13500 | 14200 |
| Alternative weighting | 12800 | 13500 | 14200 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Alsabagh 2025 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, canned on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-8675ffdc4328:eb4bb615983c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Fe reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI peach Fe reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Peach, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 10800 | 10800 | 10800 |
| Alternative weighting | 10800 | 10800 | 10800 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-05409355fc5a:70fe2d0ba56e
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Mn reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI peach Mn reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight. Peach, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 575 | 575 | 575 |
| Alternative weighting | 575 | 575 | 575 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, as sold on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-59cac77278fb:c0b2df068c21
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Mn reference · Peach, canned, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI peach Mn reference · Peach, canned, dry weight. Peach, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 2200 | 3200 | 4200 |
| Alternative weighting | 2200 | 3200 | 4200 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Alsabagh 2025 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, canned on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-6e79fc1d658b:449854943a7b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Mn reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI peach Mn reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Peach, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 883 | 883 | 883 |
| Alternative weighting | 883 | 883 | 883 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-da18825e43d5:ec3704736f71
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI peach Zn reference · Peach, canned, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI peach Zn reference · Peach, canned, dry weight. Peach, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 2300 | 3200 | 4100 |
| Alternative weighting | 2300 | 3200 | 4100 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Alsabagh 2025 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, canned on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-b4c2ccdb0091:756d185097b9
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
The source reports only a percentile, range or maximum for these samples, with no mean or median to place against the reference. Spread figures that do have a mean or median are shown on that row instead.
The value could not be reconciled with its own paper, so it is shown but not compared.
The result is below a reporting limit, and the range from zero to that limit crosses more than one band.
No medians or sample values exist for this form and metal, so no HMI reference could be built.
The HMI reference for this form has fewer than four units or no measurable spread, below the display minimum.
The result is on a basis (dry weight, or not stated) that no HMI reference for this form uses, so it cannot be placed.
Reporting limits overlap the study comparison, so no direction can be shown.
No findings match these filters. Change the selection or reset to show all source findings.
How metals reach peach
No study in the library compared peach from contaminated and ordinary settings, so the routes by which metals reach it are not measured here.
Which forms and regions measured lower
The HMI reference for lead in peach, as sold pools 157 subgroup units from 3 sampling families, with a median of between 2.4 and 4.3 µg/kg and a middle half spanning between 1.8 and 2.4 (lower quartile) and between 4.5 and 7.4 µg/kg (upper quartile).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →3What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadHealthy Babies Bright FuturesRead source →5Analytical Results for Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury in Food Intended for Babies and Young Children - TEP (FY2009-FY2024)FDA analytical results tableRead source → For lead in peach, frozen, the reference median was below 4 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 4 to below 4 µg/kg across 27 units.2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source → For lead in peach, juice, the reference median was 12.5 µg/kg, with a middle half from between 3.42 and 3.67 to 22.9 µg/kg across 4 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, peach, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (2.4 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (720 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in EURO (1 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (60 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
In one study, lead across 6 groups of peach ranged from 55.5 µg/kg (Toronto 1988) to 196 µg/kg (Montreal 1988); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.10Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Journal of AOAC InternationalRead source →
Processing, cooking and preparation
Processed or prepared forms were compared only with unprocessed peach in the same study and group. Peach, canned (5 city composites) had lead higher at 143 µg/kg, against 14.8 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (peach, as sold).10Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Journal of AOAC InternationalRead source → In another study, peach, juice (PAHO) had lead higher at 16.6 µg/kg, against 2.4 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (peach, as sold).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → A third study found that peach, peel or outer layer (local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 2019) had lead lower at 135 µg/kg, against 824 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (peach, as sold).11Detection of Heavy metals in Fruits and Vegetables available in the Market of Quetta cityAl-Nahrain Journal of Science 23(1):47-56Read source →
Forms differ in water content, so a per-kilogram difference is not by itself a measured removal or gain of metal.
Mitigation for peach
Lot testing against the applicable limit is the check that can be verified.
No measured way to lower metals in this food is in the library yet.
Trade-offs and limits of controls
Metals do not move together, so a lot that passes a lead limit says little about cadmium, arsenic or nickel unless those are tested as well.
Testing peach for metals
Results depend on the method and its reporting limit. Reporting limits for lead ranged from 0.4 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 3,000 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Reporting limits for cadmium ranged from 0.1 µg/kg (Nie et al. 2016) to 1,000 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →12Assessing the concentration and potential health risk of heavy metals in China’s main deciduous fruitsJournal of Integrative Agriculture 2016, 15(7): 1645-1655Read source → Reporting limits for total arsenic ranged from 2 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 300 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
A useful lot result names the form, the basis and a quantification limit well below the limit that applies.
Buying and verifying peach
No maximum level for metals in peach was verified from primary text for this page; buyers should confirm the limit that applies in the destination market.
Exposure from peach
No source in the library converted peach concentrations into a verified estimate of intake for a defined population. Concentrations describe the food, not individual risk.
Evidence review and remaining gaps
Every source record that names peach was decided on its content: 21 occurrence extracted, 21 records in all. The occurrence table renders every extracted result; held values remain visible with their reason.
References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.
Peach FAQs
What heavy metals are found in peach?
The library reports lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ba and Mo in peach, most often lead, cadmium and total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadHealthy Babies Bright FuturesRead source →4Occurrence and health risk assessment of antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, and lead in fresh fruits consumed in South KoreaApplied Biological ChemistryRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in peach, as sold from 2,188 results in 4 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 2.4 to 720 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Which regions report the lowest levels in peach?
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, peach, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (2.4 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (720 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in EURO (1 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (60 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Does processing change heavy metals in peach?
Only comparisons between forms in the same study are available, not before-and-after measurements of the same peach.10Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Journal of AOAC InternationalRead source → Peach, canned (5 city composites) had lead higher at 143 µg/kg, against 14.8 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (peach, as sold).10Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Journal of AOAC InternationalRead source →
How much of the arsenic in peach is inorganic?
Inorganic arsenic, the more toxic form, was measured in 9 results from 2 sources, far fewer than total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →13The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported inorganic arsenic in peach, as sold from 31 results in 2 reporting regions, with a subgroup median of 7.22 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
References
Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.
- GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsDataset
- FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsDataset
- What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadNGO
- Occurrence and health risk assessment of antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, and lead in fresh fruits consumed in South KoreaPeer-reviewed
- Analytical Results for Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury in Food Intended for Babies and Young Children - TEP (FY2009-FY2024)Dataset
- Determination and assessments of selected heavy metals in eye shadow cosmeticsPeer-reviewed
- Monitoring of Heavy Metal Content in Fruits and Vegetables Collected from Production and Market Sites in the Misurata Area of LibyaPeer-reviewed
- Analysis of Toxic Heavy Metal Content of the Most Widely Consumed FruitsPeer-reviewed
- Essential elements in the different type of fruits, soil and water samples collected from Markazi province, Iran: a health risk assessment studyPeer-reviewed
- Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Peer-reviewed
- Detection of Heavy metals in Fruits and Vegetables available in the Market of Quetta cityPeer-reviewed
- Assessing the concentration and potential health risk of heavy metals in China’s main deciduous fruitsPeer-reviewed
- The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicGovernment
Sources
Browse Peach Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.
Update history
22 October 2026: Rebuilt from every peach record in the library: 21 occurrence sources, references by form and basis, same-study contrasts.
