Overview
This is a structural ingredient node created so product pages can link to a real wiki target. Occurrence values remain pending until a source is promoted for this ingredient.
Why this commodity accumulates heavy metals
Peach (Prunus persica) is a stone fruit grown on tree branches well above the soil surface, and the edible flesh is separated from the environment by a thin skin. The primary pathway for heavy metal accumulation in peach fruit is atmospheric deposition of lead-bearing particulate matter onto the fruit surface, which is then retained in the skin or carried into harvested samples that include skin. Lead does not translocate efficiently from roots through the woody stem and bark to the fruit interior under normal orchard conditions, so interior flesh concentrations are very low. Cadmium accumulation follows a similar pattern: uptake from soil through roots, limited translocation to the fruit, with the result that peach flesh cadmium concentrations are among the lowest observed in monitored food groups.
A distinct historical contamination pathway relevant to peaches is orchard soil legacy contamination from lead arsenate pesticides, which were applied extensively in stone-fruit orchards throughout the first half of the twentieth century across the United States, United Kingdom, and Europe. These applications left residual lead and arsenic in orchard soils that persist for decades, and tree roots in these soils can reflect slightly elevated Pb uptake relative to orchards on uncontaminated soils, even when surface fruit concentrations remain low.
The regulatory relevance of peach in the United States context is driven primarily by its use as a puree in infant food formulations, where FDA’s Closer to Zero program has established action levels for Pb in fruit-and-vegetable purees consumed by infants and young children. Even though peach itself is a low-accumulation fruit, the regulatory framework applies because of the vulnerable-population exposure pattern.
Heavy metal contamination profile
Per-analyte snapshot derived from the machine-readable contamination_profile in the frontmatter above. data gap indicates the literature has been reviewed for this commodity-analyte combination and no usable occurrence data was found (a finding, not a placeholder). The Key sources column shows the top 2-3 contributing sources by year and sample size, with numbered wikilink aliases.
| Analyte | Coverage | Typical (ppb) | Confidence | Key sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | n=1 dataset; composites=27 | ND (<4; source reporting limit) | low | 1 |
| Cd | n=2 | 0–1.8 | low | 1, 2 |
| iAs | data gap | — | — | — |
| tAs | n=2 | 0–8.3 | low | 1 |
| tHg | n=1 dataset; composites=27 | ND (<1; source reporting limit) | low | 1 |
| Ni | n=2 | 0–100 | low | 1, 2 |
| Al | data gap | — | — | — |
| Cr | n=1 dataset; composites=27 | ND (<50; source reporting limit) | low | 1 |
| Sn | data gap | — | — | — |
| U | n=2 | 0 | low | — |
Routing
This node is linked from Fruit Purees.
Contamination Profile State
Per-analyte state — populated, in progress, or declared data gap — is carried authoritatively in the machine-readable contamination_profile frontmatter and the contamination-profile table above. Ingredient-level values belong here; finished-product values belong on the relevant product-category page.
FDA TDS FY2018-FY2020 Evidence
FDA’s FY2018-FY2020 Total Diet Study dataset includes this page’s routed matrix as TDS Food 83, “Peach, raw/frozen.” The normalized row-level data is stored in data/evidence/fda_tds_fy2018_2020_element_results_samples.csv, with per-food/per-analyte summaries in data/evidence/fda_tds_fy2018_2020_summary_by_food_analyte.csv. Concentrations are retained as FDA reported them, with reporting limits preserved separately; reported zeroes are not rewritten as <LOD without a source-specific rule. FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical Results
FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 source observations
FDA measured the prepared foods named below. Each row describes that food and preparation, not every form of this ingredient. Values are µg/kg (ppb) on the FDA sample basis. ND means not detected; it is not a measured zero. Reporting limits can vary between composites. FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical Results
| FDA food and preparation | Analyte | Composites | Detected | Detected concentrations (ppb) | Reporting limits (ppb) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83: Peach, raw/frozen | tAs | 27 | 17 | 3.1–12 | 3 |
| 83: Peach, raw/frozen | Cd | 27 | 10 | 1–3.4 | 1 |
| 83: Peach, raw/frozen | Cr | 27 | 0 | ND in all composites | 50 |
| 83: Peach, raw/frozen | Pb | 27 | 0 | ND in all composites | 4 |
| 83: Peach, raw/frozen | tHg | 27 | 0 | ND in all composites | 1 |
| 83: Peach, raw/frozen | Ni | 27 | 20 | 47–110 | 40 |
| 83: Peach, raw/frozen | U | 27 | 2 | 1.4–1.6 | 1 |
Ranges by source, region, and variety
Peach metal concentrations vary primarily as a function of orchard soil history and geographic origin rather than cultivar. Orchards on former lead-arsenate-treated land, particularly in eastern US apple and stone-fruit production belts, show higher Pb and As in soil and, to a lesser extent, on fruit surfaces. California and Pacific Northwest peach production, on soils with less lead-arsenate history, tends to show lower surface lead. Clingstone versus freestone peach varieties do not show documented differences in metal accumulation; the primary variance driver is soil provenance. The FDA TDS FY2018-FY2020 dataset, which samples retail product across US purchase locations, reflects the integrated distribution of US commercial production and import (FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical Results).
Processing effects
Peeling or enzymatic skin removal, as used in commercial peach processing for baby food, removes the surface-deposited lead fraction and reduces Pb concentration in the prepared product relative to whole skin-on fruit. Canning in syrup introduces a dilution effect for metals in the fruit flesh. Pureed and homogenized peach for infant food formulations reflects the metal burden of the skinless processed flesh rather than whole-fruit skin-on raw values.
Freezing does not alter metal concentrations. Cooking (heating) does not appreciably reduce heavy metal concentrations in the fruit flesh. The wet-weight basis reporting convention means that any moisture loss during processing (concentration during cooking) would appear to raise concentrations proportionally.
Ingredient-derivative risk
Fresh and frozen peach are the raw-commodity forms. Canned peach slices in syrup represent a processed derivative where the brine dilutes metals but also where any Sn migration from unlined tin cans applies (Sn is not a primary concern for peach given its near-neutral pH, but applies in principle to all canned acidic or semi-acidic foods). Peach puree, particularly in the single-serve infant food segment, concentrates the regulatory interest because it is a direct infant exposure vector. Peach juice, which removes pulp solids, has a different metal profile from whole-fruit puree; lead and cadmium in juice depend primarily on how much particulate fruit material passes into the juice fraction.
Mitigation options
Sourcing levers
Sourcing peaches from orchards with documented soil lead and arsenic below threshold levels, particularly avoiding former lead-arsenate-treated orchards for products destined for infant food formulations, is the highest-impact sourcing lever. Supplier orchard-provenance documentation and periodic soil screening are the verification mechanisms.
Agronomic levers
No quantified data on this lever in the current corpus; section will be expanded when relevant evidence is ingested.
Processing levers
Peeling before puree production removes the surface-deposited lead fraction and is the standard commercial practice for infant-grade peach puree. This step also removes any residual pesticide-related surface contamination.
Formulation levers
Diluting peach puree with other low-metal fruit purees in blended infant food formulations reduces the per-serving contribution from peach. Given that peach is already a low-metal fruit, formulation leverage is primarily relevant when orchard-specific sourcing cannot be guaranteed.
Testing and QC levers
Lot-level ICP-MS testing of incoming peach puree with Pb acceptance criteria provides assurance for infant food manufacturers. Given the low baseline concentrations typical of peach, most commercial lots will be well below EU and proposed FDA action level thresholds, but periodic testing serves as a supply-chain audit function.
Packaging and storage levers
No quantified data on this lever in the current corpus; section will be expanded when relevant evidence is ingested.
Regulatory limits that apply
Under EU Regulation (EU) 2023/915 (EU Regulation 2023/915 maximum levels for contaminants in food), the maximum level for lead in stone fruit (including peach) is 0.10 mg/kg fresh weight, and for cadmium in stone fruit is 0.050 mg/kg fresh weight. These apply to fresh peach as placed on the market.
For processed peach products intended for infants and young children, the EU applies lower Pb limits under the same regulation for processed cereal-based foods and baby foods. FDA’s Closer to Zero program (FDA Closer to Zero — Program Overview) has proposed action levels for Pb in fruit purees and juices consumed by infants and young children; the peach category is within scope of this framework. No Codex Alimentarius maximum level for Cd or Pb specifically in stone fruit applies at the same limit values as the EU, but Codex sets guidance levels for fruit generally (Codex Alimentarius — Maximum Levels for Cadmium in Food).
Interpretation of source evidence
Source observations and population estimates are different. A non-detect supplies a reporting-limit bound for the tested composites. It does not show that this ingredient contains zero metal. Where a previous profile lacked matching source, species or basis support, its generic concentration has been withdrawn; the available source evidence is kept below.
Pb. FDA source observations are non-detects at the reporting limits below. They do not estimate a zero population concentration; other literature remains separate context.
Other previously cited literature is retained as context; it does not establish the withdrawn numerical profile: Analysis of Toxic Heavy Metal Content of the Most Widely Consumed Fruits.
tHg. FDA source observations are non-detects at the reporting limits below. They do not estimate a zero population concentration; other literature remains separate context.
Cr. FDA source observations are non-detects at the reporting limits below. They do not estimate a zero population concentration; other literature remains separate context.
Other previously cited literature is retained as context; it does not establish the withdrawn numerical profile: Analysis of Toxic Heavy Metal Content of the Most Widely Consumed Fruits.
References
Works cited in this page’s text, in first-appearance order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to its source record, which carries the ingest receipt, the extracted values, and the file hash of the document it was built from.
- FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsDataset
- Analysis of Toxic Heavy Metal Content of the Most Widely Consumed FruitsPeer-reviewed
Sources
Auto-generated from source-page frontmatter. The "Used on this page for" column is populated by the orchestrator's POPULATE-SOURCE-LEGEND action; pending entries appear as *[awaiting synthesis]*.
| # | Citation | Year | Type | Used on this page for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tsegay et al. 2025. Toxicological qualities and detoxification trends of fruit by-products for valorization: A review, Open Life Sciences 20:20251105 | 2025 | Peer-reviewed | tAs, Pb, Cd, Cr, Ni, Co, tHg occurrence in Narrative review of secondary literature on by-products (peels, pomace, seeds, kernels, rinds) from the globally highest-produced fruits in… |
| 2 | FDA 2022. Total Diet Study Report: Fiscal Years 2018-2020 Elements Data, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Total Diet Study Program | 2022 | Government report | US Pb, Cd, tAs, iAs, tHg, Ni, Cr, U, Sb occurrence in Composite TDS samples across 307 foods (3,241 food/beverage samples + 35 bottled-water samples) collected across six US regions… (n=3276) |
| 3 | FDA 2022. FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical Results, FDA Total Diet Study | 2022 | Government dataset | US-FDA Pb, Cd, tAs, iAs, tHg, Ni, Cr concentrations |
| 4 | Rahim et al. 2020. Analysis of Toxic Heavy Metal Content of the Most Widely Consumed Fruits, Journal of Physical Science | 2020 | Peer-reviewed | Cr, Ni, Cd, and Pb in Pakistani peach samples from 28 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa markets, providing a low-contamination dry-weight baseline |
| 5 | Blunden et al. 2003. Tin in canned food: a review and understanding of occurrence and effect, Food and Chemical Toxicology, Vol. 41, Issue 12, pp. 1651-1662 | 2003 | Peer-reviewed | UK/EU/US Sn occurrence in Narrative review of tin-in-canned-food literature commissioned by ITRI Ltd (the International Tin Research Institute) compiling published primary clinical,… |
Update history
No substantive edit history is available in this build. The full commit record is available in git.