Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index
Apple, pear, peach, nectarine and plums illustrating peach ingredient context.

Heavy metals in Peach

Lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic and total mercury in peach: monitoring results, studies, references by form and basis, limits, testing and controls.

Quick read

Peach in the HMI library has 283 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ba and Mo from 21 sources.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Jane Houlihan, Charlotte Brody · 2019What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadHealthy Babies Bright FuturesRead source →4Lee J, Hwang I, Park YS, Lee DY · 2023Occurrence and health risk assessment of antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, and lead in fresh fruits consumed in South KoreaApplied Biological ChemistryRead source →5U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2024Analytical Results for Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury in Food Intended for Babies and Young Children - TEP (FY2009-FY2024)FDA analytical results tableRead source →6Volpe MG, Nazzaro M, Coppola R, Rapuano F, Aquino RP · 2012Determination and assessments of selected heavy metals in eye shadow cosmeticsMicrochemical JournalRead source →

Peach overview

Peach in the HMI library has 283 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ba and Mo from 21 sources.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Jane Houlihan, Charlotte Brody · 2019What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadHealthy Babies Bright FuturesRead source →4Lee J, Hwang I, Park YS, Lee DY · 2023Occurrence and health risk assessment of antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, and lead in fresh fruits consumed in South KoreaApplied Biological ChemistryRead source →5U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2024Analytical Results for Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury in Food Intended for Babies and Young Children - TEP (FY2009-FY2024)FDA analytical results tableRead source →6Volpe MG, Nazzaro M, Coppola R, Rapuano F, Aquino RP · 2012Determination and assessments of selected heavy metals in eye shadow cosmeticsMicrochemical JournalRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in peach, as sold from 2,188 results in 4 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 2.4 to 720 µg/kg.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In the US Total Diet Study, peach, frozen had a median lead result below 4 µg/kg across 27 composites from 2017–2020.2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →

Across 2 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported lead means and medians on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis ranged from 41.2 µg/kg (Lee et al. 2023) to 2,750 µg/kg (Volpe et al. 2012).4Lee J, Hwang I, Park YS, Lee DY · 2023Occurrence and health risk assessment of antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, and lead in fresh fruits consumed in South KoreaApplied Biological ChemistryRead source →6Volpe MG, Nazzaro M, Coppola R, Rapuano F, Aquino RP · 2012Determination and assessments of selected heavy metals in eye shadow cosmeticsMicrochemical JournalRead source → For cadmium, 2 studies on a dry-weight basis reported means and medians from 20 µg/kg (Elbagermi et al. 2012) to 50.7 µg/kg (Rahim et al. 2020).7Elbagermi MA, Edwards HGM, Alajtal AI · 2012Monitoring of Heavy Metal Content in Fruits and Vegetables Collected from Production and Market Sites in the Misurata Area of LibyaISRN Analytical ChemistryRead source →8Rahim M, Saqib NU, Wahid F, Khan N, Alrawi LI · 2020Analysis of Toxic Heavy Metal Content of the Most Widely Consumed FruitsJournal of Physical ScienceRead source →

For a buyer the practical points are the form bought, the basis a result is reported on, where the peach came from and the laboratory’s reporting limit. Testing finds contamination but does not remove it.

What counts as peach

This page covers peach in 6 forms kept separate in every comparison: peach, as sold (217 results), peach, canned (30 results), peach, juice (15 results), peach, dried (7 results), peach, frozen (7 results) and peach, peel or outer layer (7 results).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Jane Houlihan, Charlotte Brody · 2019What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadHealthy Babies Bright FuturesRead source →4Lee J, Hwang I, Park YS, Lee DY · 2023Occurrence and health risk assessment of antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, and lead in fresh fruits consumed in South KoreaApplied Biological ChemistryRead source →5U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2024Analytical Results for Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury in Food Intended for Babies and Young Children - TEP (FY2009-FY2024)FDA analytical results tableRead source →6Volpe MG, Nazzaro M, Coppola R, Rapuano F, Aquino RP · 2012Determination and assessments of selected heavy metals in eye shadow cosmeticsMicrochemical JournalRead source →

Results stay on the basis each source reports: as sold or fresh weight, dry weight, or unstated. Dry-weight, as-sold and unstated results are never pooled, and no moisture conversion is applied.

Heavy metal contamination profile of peach

The table holds every extracted peach result: one row for each statistic a source reports for a form, group and metal, 283 rows in all, grouped by metal and form; percentiles, ranges and maxima for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Jane Houlihan, Charlotte Brody · 2019What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadHealthy Babies Bright FuturesRead source →4Lee J, Hwang I, Park YS, Lee DY · 2023Occurrence and health risk assessment of antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, and lead in fresh fruits consumed in South KoreaApplied Biological ChemistryRead source →5U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2024Analytical Results for Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury in Food Intended for Babies and Young Children - TEP (FY2009-FY2024)FDA analytical results tableRead source →6Volpe MG, Nazzaro M, Coppola R, Rapuano F, Aquino RP · 2012Determination and assessments of selected heavy metals in eye shadow cosmeticsMicrochemical JournalRead source → Monitoring medians are HMI calculations from individual submissions; non-detects remain intervals between zero and the reporting limit and are never read as zero.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

51 rows can be rated against an HMI reference for the same form and basis, 23 rows have a direct same-study comparison, and the rest stay unrated with the reason recorded. 39 values from 2 sources failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.8Rahim M, Saqib NU, Wahid F, Khan N, Alrawi LI · 2020Analysis of Toxic Heavy Metal Content of the Most Widely Consumed FruitsJournal of Physical ScienceRead source →9Mohammad Rezaei, Yousef Fakhri, Maryam Abtahi, Majid Keramati, Gholamreza Ghasemi, Mohammad H. Moradi, Hamed Shariatifar, Mahsa Mousavi Khaneghah · 2020Essential elements in the different type of fruits, soil and water samples collected from Markazi province, Iran: a health risk assessment studyQuality Assurance and Safety of Crops & FoodsRead source →

Comparison methods and scope

Each row is one statistic a source reports for one form of peach, group and metal; percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Different forms and preparation states are kept apart, and dry-weight results never share a reference with as-sold or fresh-weight results. Ratings place a result against an HMI reference built from monitoring results and ordinary-setting medians for the same form and basis. Same-study contrasts compare a contaminated or treated site with its control, targeted with random sampling, a prepared form with the unprocessed one, or one group of a study with the median of its other groups. Held rows failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.

About this table
Food formCollection scopeFindingComparisonEvidence
Peach findings from monitoring programmes, total diet studies and every extracted field, market and contaminated-site study, in µg/kg with each source’s form, basis, statistic and censoring retained.
Food formCollection scopeFinding (µg/kg)ComparisonEvidence
55 findings · 13 studies · 2 spread figures folded in
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2016As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2015–2016As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2018As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2019As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2007–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2020As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2013As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2006–2010As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2013As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2012–2013As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2016As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2013–2014As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2000–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2000–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2016As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2014–2016As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2003–2016As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2016As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2013As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2006–2010As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2000–2005As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2013–2015As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2013As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2012As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2007–2016As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2013As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2015As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2012As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2008As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998–2010As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldHoulihan et al. 2019Fruit - single; single product sample #78; purchased Gambell, AK2019As sold / freshsample value.
Peach, as soldLee et al. 2023all samples2019As sold / freshmean.
Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024Fruits, FY20182009–2024As sold / freshsample value.
Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024Fruits, FY20182009–2024As sold / freshsample value.
Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024Fruits, FY20182009–2024As sold / freshsample value.
Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024Fruits, FY20232009–2024As sold / freshsample value.
Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024Grain-Based Snacks, FY20182009–2024As sold / freshsample value.
Peach, as soldVolpe et al. 2012powder eye shadow made in USA (sample 18, peach)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Peach, as soldVolpe et al. 2012powder eye shadow made in USA (sample 19, brilliant peach)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2016Dry weightmedian.
Peach, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012all samples2010Dry weightmean.
Peach, as soldNisa et al. 2020local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weightsample value.
Peach, as soldRahim et al. 202028 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa fruit marketsCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Peach, as soldDabeka et al. 19955 city composites1986–1988Basis not statedmedian.
Peach, as soldDabeka et al. 19955 city composites1986–1988Basis not statedmean.Same samples: 5.7 µg/kg (minimum); 89.6 µg/kg (maximum)
Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016main producing areas of China2014Basis not statedmedian.
Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016main producing areas of China2014Basis not statedmean.
Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016main producing areas of China2014Basis not statedother.
Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Peach, as soldZhang et al. 2021single marketed sample, Shandong2019Basis not statedsample value.
10 findings · 2 studies · 2 spread figures folded in
Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025Malaysia origin, 16.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025Thailand origin, 19.3% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 19955 city composites1986–1988Basis not statedmedian.
Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 19955 city composites1986–1988Basis not statedmean.Same samples: 55.5 µg/kg (minimum); 196 µg/kg (maximum)
Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995Halifax 19861986–1988Basis not statedsample value.
Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995Montreal 19881986–1988Basis not statedsample value.
Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995Ottawa 1985 (preliminary study)1986–1988Basis not statedsample value.
Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995Toronto 19881986–1988Basis not statedsample value.
Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995Vancouver 19871986–1988Basis not statedsample value.
Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995Winnipeg 19871986–1988Basis not statedsample value.
3 findings · 1 study
Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2013As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2011–2012As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2014As sold / freshmedian.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, driedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, frozenFDA Total Diet Study6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / freshmedian.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weightsample value.
40 findings · 12 studies · 2 spread figures folded in
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEMRO2019As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2016As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2015–2016As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2018As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2019As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2006–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2006As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2020As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2006As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2014As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2003–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2003–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO1999–2018As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2003–2010As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2008As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldHoulihan et al. 2019Fruit - single; single product sample #78; purchased Gambell, AK2019As sold / freshsample value.
Peach, as soldLee et al. 2023all samples2019As sold / freshmean.
Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024Fruits, FY20182009–2024As sold / freshsample value.
Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024Fruits, FY20182009–2024As sold / freshsample value.
Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024Fruits, FY20182009–2024As sold / freshnot detected.
Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024Grain-Based Snacks, FY20182009–2024As sold / freshsample value.
Peach, as soldVolpe et al. 2012powder eye shadow made in USA (sample 18, peach)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Peach, as soldVolpe et al. 2012powder eye shadow made in USA (sample 19, brilliant peach)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Peach, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012all samples2010Dry weightmean.
Peach, as soldNisa et al. 2020local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weightsample value.
Peach, as soldRahim et al. 202028 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa fruit marketsCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
Peach, as soldDabeka et al. 19955 city composites1986–1988Basis not statedmedian.
Peach, as soldDabeka et al. 19955 city composites1986–1988Basis not statedmean.Same samples: 1.38 µg/kg (minimum); 4.88 µg/kg (maximum)
Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016main producing areas of China2014Basis not statedmedian.
Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016main producing areas of China2014Basis not statedmean.
Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016main producing areas of China2014Basis not statedother.
Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
4 findings · 2 studies · 2 spread figures folded in
Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025Malaysia origin, 16.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025Thailand origin, 19.3% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 19955 city composites1986–1988Basis not statedmedian.
Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 19955 city composites1986–1988Basis not statedmean.Same samples: 1.18 µg/kg (minimum); 14.5 µg/kg (maximum)
3 findings · 2 studies
Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2014As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2014As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, juiceJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, driedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, frozenFDA Total Diet Study6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / freshmedian.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weightsample value.
20 findings · 5 studies
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2018As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2014–2021As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2015As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2010–2015As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2015As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2002–2012As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2009As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2015As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2008As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2005As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldHoulihan et al. 2019Fruit - single; single product sample #78; purchased Gambell, AK2019As sold / freshsample value.
Peach, as soldLee et al. 2023all samples2019As sold / freshmean.
Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024Fruits, FY20182009–2024As sold / freshsample value.
Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024Fruits, FY20182009–2024As sold / freshsample value.
Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024Fruits, FY20182009–2024As sold / freshnot detected.
Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024Grain-Based Snacks, FY20182009–2024As sold / freshsample value.
Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
4 findings · 1 study
Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2018As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2014–2023As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2017As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2014As sold / freshmedian.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, frozenFDA Total Diet Study6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / freshmedian.
6 findings · 2 studies
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2012–2014As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2011–2014As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2011–2014As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2011As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
3 findings · 1 study
Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2017–2021As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2017As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2022As sold / freshmedian.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2017As sold / freshmedian.
12 findings · 5 studies
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2015As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2007–2016As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2019As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2015–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2008As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998–2004As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldDabeka et al. 2003Ottawa composite (retail Oct-Nov 2000)1998–2000As sold / freshsample value.
Peach, as soldDabeka et al. 2003Whitehorse composite (retail Jan-Feb 1998)1998–2000As sold / freshnot detected.
Peach, as soldHoulihan et al. 2019Fruit - single; single product sample #78; purchased Gambell, AK2019As sold / freshsample value.
Peach, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024Fruits, FY20182009–2024As sold / freshnot detected.
Peach, as soldZhang et al. 2021single marketed sample, Shandong2019Basis not statedsample value.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, juiceWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2014As sold / freshmedian.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, frozenFDA Total Diet Study6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / freshmedian.
13 findings · 9 studies
Peach, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (LB)2003–2012As sold / freshmean.
Peach, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (UB)2003–2012As sold / freshmean.
Peach, as soldLee et al. 2023all samples2019As sold / freshmean.
Peach, as soldVolpe et al. 2012powder eye shadow made in USA (sample 18, peach)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Peach, as soldVolpe et al. 2012powder eye shadow made in USA (sample 19, brilliant peach)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Peach, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012all samples2010Dry weightmean.
Peach, as soldNisa et al. 2020local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weightsample value.
Peach, as soldRahim et al. 202028 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa fruit marketsCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Peach, as soldDabeka et al. 1995Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not statedsample value.
Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016main producing areas of China2014Basis not statedmedian.
Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016main producing areas of China2014Basis not statedmean.
Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016main producing areas of China2014Basis not statedother.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not statedsample value.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, driedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, frozenFDA Total Diet Study6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / freshmedian.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weightsample value.
14 findings · 5 studies
Peach, as soldLee et al. 2023all samples2019As sold / freshmean.
Peach, as soldVolpe et al. 2012powder eye shadow made in USA (sample 18, peach)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Peach, as soldVolpe et al. 2012powder eye shadow made in USA (sample 19, brilliant peach)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Peach, as soldRahim et al. 202028 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa fruit marketsCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020all six sitesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Delijan, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Khomein, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Khondab, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Mahallat, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Saveh, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Tafresh, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016main producing areas of China2014Basis not statedmedian.
Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016main producing areas of China2014Basis not statedmean.
Peach, as soldNie et al. 2016main producing areas of China2014Basis not statedother.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, driedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, frozenFDA Total Diet Study6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / freshmedian.
5 findings · 3 studies
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2007–2008As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Peach, as soldWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
5 findings · 2 studies
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2007–2008As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2015As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998As sold / freshmedian.
Peach, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
2 findings · 2 studies
Peach, as soldLee et al. 2023all samples2019As sold / freshmean.
Peach, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, frozenFDA Total Diet Study6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / freshmedian.
6 findings · 5 studies
Peach, as soldVolpe et al. 2012powder eye shadow made in USA (sample 18, peach)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Peach, as soldVolpe et al. 2012powder eye shadow made in USA (sample 19, brilliant peach)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Peach, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012all samples2010Dry weightmean.
Peach, as soldNisa et al. 2020local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weightsample value.
Peach, as soldRahim et al. 202028 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa fruit marketsCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldDabeka et al. 1995Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not statedsample value.
3 findings · 2 studies
Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025Malaysia origin, 16.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025Thailand origin, 19.3% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Peach, cannedDabeka et al. 1995Montreal composite1986–1988Basis not statedsample value.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, driedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weightsample value.
9 findings · 3 studies
Peach, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012all samples2010Dry weightmean.
Peach, as soldNisa et al. 2020local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weightsample value.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020all six sitesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Delijan, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Khomein, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Khondab, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Mahallat, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Saveh, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Tafresh, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025Malaysia origin, 16.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025Thailand origin, 19.3% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weightsample value.
8 findings · 2 studies
Peach, as soldNisa et al. 2020local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weightsample value.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020all six sitesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Delijan, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Khomein, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Khondab, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Mahallat, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Saveh, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Tafresh, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025Malaysia origin, 16.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025Thailand origin, 19.3% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weightsample value.
8 findings · 2 studies
Peach, as soldNisa et al. 2020local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weightsample value.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020all six sitesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Delijan, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Khomein, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Khondab, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Mahallat, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Saveh, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Tafresh, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025Malaysia origin, 16.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025Thailand origin, 19.3% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 20192019Dry weightsample value.
8 findings · 2 studies
Peach, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012all samples2010Dry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020all six sitesCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Delijan, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Khomein, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Khondab, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Mahallat, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Saveh, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Peach, as soldRezaei et al. 2020Tafresh, MarkaziCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025Malaysia origin, 16.7% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Peach, cannedAlsabagh 2025Thailand origin, 19.3% dry solids, Baghdad marketCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, driedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, as soldLee et al. 2023all samples2019As sold / freshmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Peach, driedAkçay et al. 2023market samples, Konya Province, Turkey (2021 products)2021Basis not statedmean.
Shared dataset methods and interpretation

Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.

HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, as sold. Peach, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference1.8–2.4 (bounded)2.4–4.3 (bounded)4.5–7.4 (bounded)
Alternative weighting0.9–2.4 (bounded)2.4–3.5 (bounded)7.4

157 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food15133%
Houlihan et al. 2019133%
U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024533%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-2a9c5f477b34:b7ec6875301e

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight. Peach, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference50437824
Alternative weighting50437824

2 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food150%
Nisa et al. 2020150%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-9dc50be25f6a:2b5ce02edc81

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, canned, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, canned, dry weight. Peach, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference220032004200
Alternative weighting220032004200

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Alsabagh 20252100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, canned on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-98fa043a7936:52fbbe2de658

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, juice

Reference and scope

HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, juice. Peach, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference3.42–3.67 (bounded)12.522.9
Alternative weighting3.42–3.67 (bounded)12.522.9

4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food4100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for peach, juice on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-1e4be78b349c:6abaa76f4aa5

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, frozen. Peach, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤4≤4≤4
Alternative weighting≤4≤4≤4

27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study27100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for peach, frozen on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-e2e74e4a70fa:f6146cc2878f

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI peach Pb reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Peach, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference135135135
Alternative weighting135135135

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-e71939fee652:c0ab4e2e3ab8

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Cd reference · Peach, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI peach Cd reference · Peach, as sold. Peach, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference1.45–2 (bounded)2.12.3
Alternative weighting1.3–2 (bounded)2.12.3–3 (bounded)

126 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food12233%
Houlihan et al. 2019133%
U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024333%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-f29c3d7d9d29:08ae5f58a6fa

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Cd reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI peach Cd reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight. Peach, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference106106106
Alternative weighting106106106

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, as sold on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-c8485268caff:47dbf6fcbacb

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Cd reference · Peach, juice

Reference and scope

HMI peach Cd reference · Peach, juice. Peach, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤2≤3.5≤5
Alternative weighting≤2≤3.5≤5

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food2100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for peach, juice on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-c10cdbb61c6e:8541b2604daa

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Cd reference · Peach, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI peach Cd reference · Peach, frozen. Peach, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤1≤11.2
Alternative weighting≤1≤11.1

27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study27100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for peach, frozen on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-9c543fe43691:9da8d9933830

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Cd reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI peach Cd reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Peach, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference105105105
Alternative weighting105105105

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-427a608da6a8:de6cc703704b

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach tAs reference · Peach, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI peach tAs reference · Peach, as sold. Peach, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤4.94.9–7.3 (bounded)7.3–15 (bounded)
Alternative weighting0.79–5 (bounded)7.37.3–20 (bounded)

39 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food3533%
Houlihan et al. 2019133%
U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024333%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-3d7d94fffdbd:d23d9602587a

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach tAs reference · Peach, juice

Reference and scope

HMI peach tAs reference · Peach, juice. Peach, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤7≤11.9≤20
Alternative weighting≤5≤11≤20

13 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food13100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for peach, juice on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-3956e15f2a26:e0ed788f9ccf

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach tAs reference · Peach, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI peach tAs reference · Peach, frozen. Peach, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤33.65.8
Alternative weighting≤33.55.8

27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study27100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for peach, frozen on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-9f393b9c0f45:ca14c1713b55

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach iAs reference · Peach, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI peach iAs reference · Peach, as sold. Peach, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤0.66≤0.660.345–3 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤0.66≤0.6670.172–3 (bounded)

10 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food10100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for peach, as sold on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-ca90129ca9f5:a2869b94a8bd

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach iAs reference · Peach, juice

Reference and scope

HMI peach iAs reference · Peach, juice. Peach, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤20≤20≤20
Alternative weighting≤20≤20≤20

6 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food6100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for peach, juice on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-7ae542b53be8:15d9d5fef127

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach DMA reference · Peach, juice

Reference and scope

HMI peach DMA reference · Peach, juice. Peach, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤20≤20≤20
Alternative weighting≤20≤20≤20

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food1100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for peach, juice on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-b5cc0788a457:5c5a53b2115f

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach tHg reference · Peach, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI peach tHg reference · Peach, as sold. Peach, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤0.050.05–0.142 (bounded)0.142–0.255 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤0.050.13–0.142 (bounded)0.142–0.21 (bounded)

33 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food3033%
Dabeka et al. 2003233%
Houlihan et al. 2019133%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-59a9afe350ec:62e09675fe0c

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach tHg reference · Peach, juice

Reference and scope

HMI peach tHg reference · Peach, juice. Peach, juice; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤5≤5≤5
Alternative weighting≤5≤5≤5

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food1100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, juice on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for peach, juice on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-0230a1e6414b:2bb0659ec835

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach tHg reference · Peach, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI peach tHg reference · Peach, frozen. Peach, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤1≤1≤1
Alternative weighting≤1≤1≤1

27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study27100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for peach, frozen on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-872607afd11c:2f52903fe59e

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Ni reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI peach Ni reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight. Peach, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference205205205
Alternative weighting205205205

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, as sold on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-1c51995d7987:e57f8491ea61

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Ni reference · Peach, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI peach Ni reference · Peach, frozen. Peach, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤405772
Alternative weighting475772

27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study27100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for peach, frozen on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-ad547b781432:725bab6c56b1

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Ni reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI peach Ni reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Peach, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference159159159
Alternative weighting159159159

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-baf2376795fb:e5c78a8cc36e

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Cr reference · Peach, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI peach Cr reference · Peach, frozen. Peach, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤50≤50≤50
Alternative weighting≤50≤50≤50

27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study27100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for peach, frozen on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-7f26013ae18c:8cf099ce7a0d

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Al reference · Peach, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI peach Al reference · Peach, as sold. Peach, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference74912301720
Alternative weighting74912301720

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food2100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for peach, as sold on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-06b3e0643fbb:33d884a2a726

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Sn reference · Peach, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI peach Sn reference · Peach, as sold. Peach, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference8.5–9.25 (bounded)1250027800
Alternative weighting8.5–9.25 (bounded)1250027800

4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food4100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for peach, as sold on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-8a3612547c12:da11041fc03b

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach U reference · Peach, frozen

Reference and scope

HMI peach U reference · Peach, frozen. Peach, frozen; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤1≤1≤1
Alternative weighting≤1≤1≤1

27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study27100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, frozen on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for peach, frozen on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-f9e0cb229f38:dd0c9f981b5b

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Co reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI peach Co reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight. Peach, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference370370370
Alternative weighting370370370

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, as sold on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-4a6fbd709691:77753c098e20

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Co reference · Peach, canned, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI peach Co reference · Peach, canned, dry weight. Peach, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference100100100
Alternative weighting100100100

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Alsabagh 20251100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, canned on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-97dea01c286a:85c959cdc581

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Co reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI peach Co reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Peach, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference391391391
Alternative weighting391391391

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-f074b4c2ec91:2120815f2186

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Cu reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI peach Cu reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight. Peach, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference394394394
Alternative weighting394394394

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, as sold on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-14f706b0666b:69f87ea33b7b

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Cu reference · Peach, canned, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI peach Cu reference · Peach, canned, dry weight. Peach, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference58001140017000
Alternative weighting58001140017000

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Alsabagh 20252100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, canned on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-cf45f7f9d3f8:f2a12752dd4b

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Cu reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI peach Cu reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Peach, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference556556556
Alternative weighting556556556

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-106e932f64cf:ebea59820286

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Fe reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI peach Fe reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight. Peach, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference474047404740
Alternative weighting474047404740

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, as sold on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-3d814805843b:f6443cf5093d

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Fe reference · Peach, canned, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI peach Fe reference · Peach, canned, dry weight. Peach, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference128001350014200
Alternative weighting128001350014200

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Alsabagh 20252100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, canned on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-8675ffdc4328:eb4bb615983c

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Fe reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI peach Fe reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Peach, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference108001080010800
Alternative weighting108001080010800

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-05409355fc5a:70fe2d0ba56e

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Mn reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI peach Mn reference · Peach, as sold, dry weight. Peach, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference575575575
Alternative weighting575575575

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, as sold on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-59cac77278fb:c0b2df068c21

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Mn reference · Peach, canned, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI peach Mn reference · Peach, canned, dry weight. Peach, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference220032004200
Alternative weighting220032004200

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Alsabagh 20252100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, canned on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-6e79fc1d658b:449854943a7b

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Mn reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI peach Mn reference · Peach, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Peach, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference883883883
Alternative weighting883883883

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-da18825e43d5:ec3704736f71

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI peach Zn reference · Peach, canned, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI peach Zn reference · Peach, canned, dry weight. Peach, canned; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference230032004100
Alternative weighting230032004100

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Alsabagh 20252100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for peach, canned on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Alsabagh 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for peach, canned on this basis in the completed peach ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:peach-b4c2ccdb0091:756d185097b9

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

1 dataset

How metals reach peach

No study in the library compared peach from contaminated and ordinary settings, so the routes by which metals reach it are not measured here.

Which forms and regions measured lower

The HMI reference for lead in peach, as sold pools 157 subgroup units from 3 sampling families, with a median of between 2.4 and 4.3 µg/kg and a middle half spanning between 1.8 and 2.4 (lower quartile) and between 4.5 and 7.4 µg/kg (upper quartile).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →3Jane Houlihan, Charlotte Brody · 2019What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadHealthy Babies Bright FuturesRead source →5U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2024Analytical Results for Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury in Food Intended for Babies and Young Children - TEP (FY2009-FY2024)FDA analytical results tableRead source → For lead in peach, frozen, the reference median was below 4 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 4 to below 4 µg/kg across 27 units.2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source → For lead in peach, juice, the reference median was 12.5 µg/kg, with a middle half from between 3.42 and 3.67 to 22.9 µg/kg across 4 units.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, peach, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (2.4 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (720 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in EURO (1 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (60 µg/kg).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

In one study, lead across 6 groups of peach ranged from 55.5 µg/kg (Toronto 1988) to 196 µg/kg (Montreal 1988); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.10Dabeka RW, McKenzie AD · 1995Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Journal of AOAC InternationalRead source →

Processing, cooking and preparation

Processed or prepared forms were compared only with unprocessed peach in the same study and group. Peach, canned (5 city composites) had lead higher at 143 µg/kg, against 14.8 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (peach, as sold).10Dabeka RW, McKenzie AD · 1995Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Journal of AOAC InternationalRead source → In another study, peach, juice (PAHO) had lead higher at 16.6 µg/kg, against 2.4 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (peach, as sold).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → A third study found that peach, peel or outer layer (local market, Quetta; brought from Sawat; June-July 2019) had lead lower at 135 µg/kg, against 824 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (peach, as sold).11Nisa KU, Samiullah, Khan N, Attiq-ur-Rehman · 2020Detection of Heavy metals in Fruits and Vegetables available in the Market of Quetta cityAl-Nahrain Journal of Science 23(1):47-56Read source →

Forms differ in water content, so a per-kilogram difference is not by itself a measured removal or gain of metal.

Mitigation for peach

Lot testing against the applicable limit is the check that can be verified.

No measured way to lower metals in this food is in the library yet.

Trade-offs and limits of controls

Metals do not move together, so a lot that passes a lead limit says little about cadmium, arsenic or nickel unless those are tested as well.

Testing peach for metals

Results depend on the method and its reporting limit. Reporting limits for lead ranged from 0.4 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 3,000 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Reporting limits for cadmium ranged from 0.1 µg/kg (Nie et al. 2016) to 1,000 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →12Nie JY, Kuang LX, Li ZX, Xu WH, Wang C, Chen QS, Li A, Zhao XB, Xie HZ, Zhao DY, Wu YL, Cheng Y · 2016Assessing the concentration and potential health risk of heavy metals in China’s main deciduous fruitsJournal of Integrative Agriculture 2016, 15(7): 1645-1655Read source → Reporting limits for total arsenic ranged from 2 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 300 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

A useful lot result names the form, the basis and a quantification limit well below the limit that applies.

Buying and verifying peach

No maximum level for metals in peach was verified from primary text for this page; buyers should confirm the limit that applies in the destination market.

Exposure from peach

No source in the library converted peach concentrations into a verified estimate of intake for a defined population. Concentrations describe the food, not individual risk.

Evidence review and remaining gaps

Every source record that names peach was decided on its content: 21 occurrence extracted, 21 records in all. The occurrence table renders every extracted result; held values remain visible with their reason.

References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.

Peach FAQs

What heavy metals are found in peach?

The library reports lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ba and Mo in peach, most often lead, cadmium and total arsenic.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Jane Houlihan, Charlotte Brody · 2019What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadHealthy Babies Bright FuturesRead source →4Lee J, Hwang I, Park YS, Lee DY · 2023Occurrence and health risk assessment of antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, and lead in fresh fruits consumed in South KoreaApplied Biological ChemistryRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in peach, as sold from 2,188 results in 4 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 2.4 to 720 µg/kg.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

Which regions report the lowest levels in peach?

Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, peach, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (2.4 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (720 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in EURO (1 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (60 µg/kg).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

Does processing change heavy metals in peach?

Only comparisons between forms in the same study are available, not before-and-after measurements of the same peach.10Dabeka RW, McKenzie AD · 1995Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Journal of AOAC InternationalRead source → Peach, canned (5 city composites) had lead higher at 143 µg/kg, against 14.8 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (peach, as sold).10Dabeka RW, McKenzie AD · 1995Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Journal of AOAC InternationalRead source →

How much of the arsenic in peach is inorganic?

Inorganic arsenic, the more toxic form, was measured in 9 results from 2 sources, far fewer than total arsenic.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →13Centre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR · 2012The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported inorganic arsenic in peach, as sold from 31 results in 2 reporting regions, with a subgroup median of 7.22 µg/kg.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

References

Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.

  1. GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsWorld Health Organization · GEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment Programme · 2026 · extranet.who.intDataset
  2. FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsU.S. Food and Drug Administration · FDA Total Diet Study · 2022 · www.fda.govDataset
  3. What’s in My Baby’s Food? A National Investigation Finds 95 Percent of Baby Foods Tested Contain Toxic Chemicals That Lower Babies’ IQ, Including Arsenic and LeadJane Houlihan and Charlotte Brody · Healthy Babies Bright Futures · 2019 · www.hbbf.orgNGO
  4. Occurrence and health risk assessment of antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, and lead in fresh fruits consumed in South KoreaLee J, Hwang I, Park YS, and Lee DY · Applied Biological Chemistry · 2023 · doi.org/10.1186/s13765-023-00799-xPeer-reviewed
  5. Analytical Results for Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury in Food Intended for Babies and Young Children - TEP (FY2009-FY2024)U.S. Food and Drug Administration · FDA analytical results table · 2024 · www.fda.govDataset
  6. Determination and assessments of selected heavy metals in eye shadow cosmeticsVolpe MG, Nazzaro M, Coppola R, Rapuano F, and Aquino RP · Microchemical Journal · 2012 · doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2011.10.008Peer-reviewed
  7. Monitoring of Heavy Metal Content in Fruits and Vegetables Collected from Production and Market Sites in the Misurata Area of LibyaElbagermi MA, Edwards HGM, and Alajtal AI · ISRN Analytical Chemistry · 2012 · doi.org/10.5402/2012/827645Peer-reviewed
  8. Analysis of Toxic Heavy Metal Content of the Most Widely Consumed FruitsRahim M, Saqib NU, Wahid F, Khan N, and Alrawi LI · Journal of Physical Science · 2020 · doi.org/10.21315/jps2020.31.2.5Peer-reviewed
  9. Essential elements in the different type of fruits, soil and water samples collected from Markazi province, Iran: a health risk assessment studyMohammad Rezaei, Yousef Fakhri, Maryam Abtahi, Majid Keramati, Gholamreza Ghasemi, Mohammad H. Moradi, et al. · Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods · 2020 · doi.org/10.15586/qas.v12i3.777Peer-reviewed
  10. Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988Dabeka RW and McKenzie AD · Journal of AOAC International · 1995 · academic.oup.comPeer-reviewed
  11. Detection of Heavy metals in Fruits and Vegetables available in the Market of Quetta cityNisa KU, Samiullah, Khan N, and Attiq-ur-Rehman · Al-Nahrain Journal of Science 23(1):47-56 · 2020 · doi.org/10.22401/anjs.23.1.07Peer-reviewed
  12. Assessing the concentration and potential health risk of heavy metals in China’s main deciduous fruitsNie JY, Kuang LX, Li ZX, Xu WH, Wang C, Chen QS, et al. · Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2016, 15(7): 1645-1655 · 2016 · doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61342-4Peer-reviewed
  13. The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR · Centre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region · 2012 · www.cfs.gov.hkGovernment

Sources

Browse Peach Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.

Update history

22 October 2026: Rebuilt from every peach record in the library: 21 occurrence sources, references by form and basis, same-study contrasts.