Oat in the HMI library has 407 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, tin, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Ca, mercury (Hg), Mg, Na and P from 25 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Evaluation of Concentrations and Health Risk Assessment of Cadmium, Lead, Chromium and Arsenic inPeer-reviewed articleRead source →3Integral assessment of the environmental safety of plant-based milk alternatives based on heavy metal analysisIzvestiya KGTU (KSTU News)Read source →4Gluten-Free Cereals and Pseudocereals as a Potential Source of Exposure to Toxic Elements among Polish ResidentsNutrients 2022, 14, 2342Read source →5Comparative exposure and risk assessment of heavy metals, nutrients, and organochlorine pesticides in cow and plant-based milksScientific ReportsRead source →6Essential and Non-essential Trace Elements in Milks and Plant-Based DrinksBiological Trace Element ResearchRead source →
-
Metals measured:
Lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid and total mercury and others, in 407 results from 25 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Evaluation of Concentrations and Health Risk Assessment of Cadmium, Lead, Chromium and Arsenic inPeer-reviewed articleRead source →3Integral assessment of the environmental safety of plant-based milk alternatives based on heavy metal analysisIzvestiya KGTU (KSTU News)Read source →4Gluten-Free Cereals and Pseudocereals as a Potential Source of Exposure to Toxic Elements among Polish ResidentsNutrients 2022, 14, 2342Read source →
-
Main drivers:
Oat, as sold from retail brand A had lead higher at 2,800 µg/kg, against 1,100 µg/kg for retail brand A in the same study.7Quantitative Determination of Heavy Metals in Ready to Eat Food ProductsInternational Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR) 7(6), November-December 2025Read source →
-
Practical framing:
Ask for lot results with a quantification limit well below the limit that applies in the destination market.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Evaluation of Concentrations and Health Risk Assessment of Cadmium, Lead, Chromium and Arsenic inPeer-reviewed articleRead source →3Integral assessment of the environmental safety of plant-based milk alternatives based on heavy metal analysisIzvestiya KGTU (KSTU News)Read source →4Gluten-Free Cereals and Pseudocereals as a Potential Source of Exposure to Toxic Elements among Polish ResidentsNutrients 2022, 14, 2342Read source →
Oat overview
Oat in the HMI library has 407 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, tin, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Ca, Hg, Mg, Na and P from 25 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Evaluation of Concentrations and Health Risk Assessment of Cadmium, Lead, Chromium and Arsenic inPeer-reviewed articleRead source →3Integral assessment of the environmental safety of plant-based milk alternatives based on heavy metal analysisIzvestiya KGTU (KSTU News)Read source →4Gluten-Free Cereals and Pseudocereals as a Potential Source of Exposure to Toxic Elements among Polish ResidentsNutrients 2022, 14, 2342Read source →5Comparative exposure and risk assessment of heavy metals, nutrients, and organochlorine pesticides in cow and plant-based milksScientific ReportsRead source →6Essential and Non-essential Trace Elements in Milks and Plant-Based DrinksBiological Trace Element ResearchRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in oat, as sold from 1,272 results in 3 reporting regions, with a subgroup median of 10 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, GEMS/Food gave subgroup medians from 6.9 to 100 µg/kg from 1,704 results.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Across 3 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported lead means and medians on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis ranged from 11.2 µg/kg (Begday et al. 2026) to 170 µg/kg (Caridi et al. 2021).3Integral assessment of the environmental safety of plant-based milk alternatives based on heavy metal analysisIzvestiya KGTU (KSTU News)Read source →8Evaluation of the Radiological and Chemical Risk for Public Health from Flour Sample InvestigationApplied Sciences 2021, 11, 3646Read source → For cadmium, 3 studies on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis reported means and medians from 6.8 µg/kg (Begday et al. 2026) to 60.5 µg/kg (Bielecka et al. 2022).3Integral assessment of the environmental safety of plant-based milk alternatives based on heavy metal analysisIzvestiya KGTU (KSTU News)Read source →4Gluten-Free Cereals and Pseudocereals as a Potential Source of Exposure to Toxic Elements among Polish ResidentsNutrients 2022, 14, 2342Read source → Higher results came from contaminated or exposed settings rather than ordinary supply. Oat, as sold from retail brand A had lead higher at 2,800 µg/kg, against 1,100 µg/kg for retail brand A in the same study.7Quantitative Determination of Heavy Metals in Ready to Eat Food ProductsInternational Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR) 7(6), November-December 2025Read source →
For a buyer the practical points are the form bought, the basis a result is reported on, where the oat came from and the laboratory’s reporting limit. Testing finds contamination but does not remove it.
What counts as oat
This page covers oat in 4 forms kept separate in every comparison: oat, as sold (314 results), oat, flour or meal (60 results), oat, peel or outer layer (26 results) and oat, cooked (7 results).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Evaluation of Concentrations and Health Risk Assessment of Cadmium, Lead, Chromium and Arsenic inPeer-reviewed articleRead source →3Integral assessment of the environmental safety of plant-based milk alternatives based on heavy metal analysisIzvestiya KGTU (KSTU News)Read source →4Gluten-Free Cereals and Pseudocereals as a Potential Source of Exposure to Toxic Elements among Polish ResidentsNutrients 2022, 14, 2342Read source →5Comparative exposure and risk assessment of heavy metals, nutrients, and organochlorine pesticides in cow and plant-based milksScientific ReportsRead source →6Essential and Non-essential Trace Elements in Milks and Plant-Based DrinksBiological Trace Element ResearchRead source → Foods made from oat that have their own pages, such as oat ring cereal, are covered there.
Results stay on the basis each source reports: as sold or fresh weight, dry weight, or unstated. Dry-weight, as-sold and unstated results are never pooled, and no moisture conversion is applied.
Heavy metal contamination profile of oat
The table holds every extracted oat result: one row for each statistic a source reports for a form, group and metal, 407 rows in all, grouped by metal and form; percentiles, ranges and maxima for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Evaluation of Concentrations and Health Risk Assessment of Cadmium, Lead, Chromium and Arsenic inPeer-reviewed articleRead source →3Integral assessment of the environmental safety of plant-based milk alternatives based on heavy metal analysisIzvestiya KGTU (KSTU News)Read source →4Gluten-Free Cereals and Pseudocereals as a Potential Source of Exposure to Toxic Elements among Polish ResidentsNutrients 2022, 14, 2342Read source →5Comparative exposure and risk assessment of heavy metals, nutrients, and organochlorine pesticides in cow and plant-based milksScientific ReportsRead source →6Essential and Non-essential Trace Elements in Milks and Plant-Based DrinksBiological Trace Element ResearchRead source → Monitoring medians are HMI calculations from individual submissions; non-detects remain intervals between zero and the reporting limit and are never read as zero.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
71 rows can be rated against an HMI reference for the same form and basis, 45 rows have a direct same-study comparison, and the rest stay unrated with the reason recorded. 64 values from 5 sources failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.4Gluten-Free Cereals and Pseudocereals as a Potential Source of Exposure to Toxic Elements among Polish ResidentsNutrients 2022, 14, 2342Read source →5Comparative exposure and risk assessment of heavy metals, nutrients, and organochlorine pesticides in cow and plant-based milksScientific ReportsRead source →7Quantitative Determination of Heavy Metals in Ready to Eat Food ProductsInternational Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR) 7(6), November-December 2025Read source →9A study on heavy metal content in rolled oats available in domestic market in IndiaInternational Journal of Pharmacy and Analytical Research 8(3), 260-265 (Jul-Sep 2019)Read source →10Dietary Exposure to Toxic Metals (Cd, Pb and Hg) from Cereals Marketed in Madeira and the AzoresBiological Trace Element ResearchRead source →
Comparison methods and scope
Each row is one statistic a source reports for one form of oat, group and metal; percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Different forms and preparation states are kept apart, and dry-weight results never share a reference with as-sold or fresh-weight results. Ratings place a result against an HMI reference built from monitoring results and ordinary-setting medians for the same form and basis. Same-study contrasts compare a contaminated or treated site with its control, targeted with random sampling, a prepared form with the unprocessed one, or one group of a study with the median of its other groups. Held rows failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.
First displayed analyte: Lead: 143 findings from 17 sources. Each row retains its statistic and measurement basis.
Filter findings
347 of 347 findings · 21 analytes
About this table
| Food form | Collection scope | Finding (µg/kg) | Comparison | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
112 findings · 16 studies · 8 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2012–2019 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2015 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2011–2017 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2013–2016 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013–2018 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2000–2010 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013–2014 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013–2014 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2013–2014 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2008 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2009–2014 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2004–2013 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2001 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldauthors 2025 | productCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldBegday et al. 2026 | commercial retail productCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | mean.Same samples: 19 µg/kg (minimum); 113 µg/kg (maximum); 43.1 µg/kg (percentile); 55.1 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | min. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | max. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | mean.Same samples: 39.5 µg/kg (minimum); 113 µg/kg (maximum); 40.6 µg/kg (percentile); 60.6 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | min. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | max. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, as soldGood et al. 2026 | all brands (milk-type mean)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldMarques et al. 2021 | all samples2021 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMarques et al. 2021 | all samples2021 | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldShaikh et al. 2025 | retail brand ACollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldShaikh et al. 2025 | retail brand ACollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldShaikh et al. 2025 | retail brand BCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldShaikh et al. 2025 | retail brand BCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20162009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20172009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20182009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20182009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20182009–2024 | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20192009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20202009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20202009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20212009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20222009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20242009–2024 | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldKowalska 2021 | all samples2015–2018Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C7), measured by flame AASCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C7), measured by ICP-AESCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldCantoral et al. 2024 | Cereals (retail, Mexico City)2022–2023Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 1, AmritsarCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 2, AmritsarCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 3, ChennaiCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 4, BhopalCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 5, BhopalCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 6, BhopalCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 7, BhopalCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 8, BhopalCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 9, BhopalCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 10, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 11, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 12, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 13, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 14, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 15, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 16, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 17, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 18, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 19, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 20, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 21, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 22, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 23, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 24, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 25, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 26, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 27, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 28, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 29, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 30, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 31, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 32, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 33, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 34, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 35, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 36, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 37, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 38, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 39, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 40, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 41, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 42, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 43, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 44, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 45, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 46, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 47, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 48, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 49, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 50, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 51, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 52, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 53, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 54, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 55, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 56, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 57, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 58, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMukherjee et al. 2019 | market sample 59, NagpurCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMyrzhkbayeva et al. 2022 | breeding variety "Arman"Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldMyrzhkbayeva et al. 2022 | breeding variety "Bityk"Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldMyrzhkbayeva et al. 2022 | breeding variety "Duman"Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | zone of intensive farming, Right-bank Forest-steppe, UkraineCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldRubio et al. 2023 | Madeira marketCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer C2016–2019Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
11 findings · 3 studies · 4 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | median. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | mean.Same samples: 41 µg/kg (minimum); 86.6 µg/kg (maximum); 46.3 µg/kg (percentile); 61.3 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | min. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | max. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealCaridi et al. 2021 | retail flour type S8, five samples from large retailers, ItalyCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 1/11/20182016–2019Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 1/16/20182016–2019Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 1/30/20182016–2019Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 3/13/20182016–2019Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 6/22/20182016–2019Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 7/5/20182016–2019Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 9/13/20192016–2019Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 10/1/20192016–2019Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
2 findings · 1 study · 4 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | median. | ||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | mean.Same samples: 38.2 µg/kg (minimum); 78.6 µg/kg (maximum); 43.9 µg/kg (percentile); 68.4 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | min. | ||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | max. | ||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, cookedWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2015 | median. | ||
| Oat, cookedWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2008–2011 | median. | ||
59 findings · 16 studies · 6 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EMRO2015–2019 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2006–2019 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2015 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2011–2017 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2016 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2006 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2006 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2010 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2017 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2017 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014–2017 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2008 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2014 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2001 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldauthors 2025 | productCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldBegday et al. 2026 | commercial retail productCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | mean.Same samples: 1.05 µg/kg (minimum); 139 µg/kg (maximum); 17.9 µg/kg (percentile); 41.7 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | min. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | max. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | mean.Same samples: 5.7 µg/kg (minimum); 70.9 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | min. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | max. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, as soldGood et al. 2026 | all brands (milk-type mean)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldShaikh et al. 2025 | retail brand ACollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldShaikh et al. 2025 | retail brand ACollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldShaikh et al. 2025 | retail brand BCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldShaikh et al. 2025 | retail brand BCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20162009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20172009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20182009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20182009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20182009–2024 | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20192009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20202009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20202009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20212009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20222009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20242009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldAltunay et al. 2023 | greengrocer, SivasCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldKowalska 2021 | all samples2015–2018Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldCantoral et al. 2024 | all samples (single foodstuff, duplicate mean)2022–2023Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2011 | Australia data submission2002–2009Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2011 | Food industry (ingredients used worldwide) data submission2002–2009Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2011 | USA (FDA total diet study) data submission2002–2009Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldMyrzhkbayeva et al. 2022 | breeding variety "Arman"Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldMyrzhkbayeva et al. 2022 | breeding variety "Bityk"Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldMyrzhkbayeva et al. 2022 | breeding variety "Duman"Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | zone of intensive farming, Right-bank Forest-steppe, UkraineCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldRubio et al. 2023 | Madeira marketCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer C2016–2019Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
12 findings · 3 studies · 4 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | median. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | mean.Same samples: 10.1 µg/kg (minimum); 41.7 µg/kg (maximum); 12.7 µg/kg (percentile); 23.6 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | min. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | max. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealCaridi et al. 2021 | retail flour type S8, five samples from large retailers, ItalyCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 1/11/20182016–2019Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 1/16/20182016–2019Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 1/30/20182016–2019Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 3/13/20182016–2019Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 6/22/20182016–2019Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 7/5/20182016–2019Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 9/13/20192016–2019Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 10/1/20192016–2019Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer C2016–2019Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
2 findings · 1 study · 4 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | median. | ||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | mean.Same samples: 6.48 µg/kg (minimum); 139 µg/kg (maximum); 34.6 µg/kg (percentile); 68.4 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | min. | ||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | max. | ||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, cookedWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2013–2015 | median. | ||
| Oat, cookedWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2008–2011 | median. | ||
41 findings · 9 studies · 6 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2014 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2010–2015 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2006–2015 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2014–2022 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2019 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2018 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2023 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015–2021 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2022 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2020–2023 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2008 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2009–2014 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2005 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2001 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldauthors 2025 | productCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | mean.Same samples: 1.78 µg/kg (minimum); 44.1 µg/kg (maximum); 4.49 µg/kg (percentile); 12.8 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | min. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | max. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | mean.Same samples: 2.4 µg/kg (minimum); 30.7 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | min. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | max. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, as soldGood et al. 2026 | all brands (milk-type mean)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldRuzik et al. 2022 | Polish marketsCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20162009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20172009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20182009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20182009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20182009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20192009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20202009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20202009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20212009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20222009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20242009–2024 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldKowalska 2021 | all samples2015–2018Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldMyrzhkbayeva et al. 2022 | breeding variety "Arman"Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldMyrzhkbayeva et al. 2022 | breeding variety "Bityk"Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldMyrzhkbayeva et al. 2022 | breeding variety "Duman"Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldRuzik et al. 2022 | Polish marketsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer C2016–2019Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
10 findings · 2 studies · 4 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | median. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | mean.Same samples: 4.21 µg/kg (minimum); 15.2 µg/kg (maximum); 7.88 µg/kg (percentile); 12.1 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | min. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | max. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 1/11/20182016–2019Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 1/16/20182016–2019Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 1/30/20182016–2019Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 3/13/20182016–2019Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 6/22/20182016–2019Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 7/5/20182016–2019Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 9/13/20192016–2019Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealU.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Reform, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy 2021 | US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 10/1/20192016–2019Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
3 findings · 2 studies · 4 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Oat, peel or outer layerWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2014–2023 | median. | ||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | median. | ||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | mean.Same samples: 5.46 µg/kg (minimum); 18.3 µg/kg (maximum); 6.65 µg/kg (percentile); 13.7 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | min. | ||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | max. | ||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, cookedWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2013–2014 | median. | ||
11 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2014 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2022 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2016–2022 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2021–2023 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2012–2014 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2021 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 | European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 | European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 | European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, peel or outer layerWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2018–2021 | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, cookedWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2013–2014 | median. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2016–2017 | median. | ||
18 findings · 5 studies · 8 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2013–2014 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2011–2016 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2006 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2001–2017 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2011 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2008 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2005 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2014 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2001 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | mean.Same samples: 0.13 µg/kg (minimum); 3.57 µg/kg (maximum); 0.42 µg/kg (percentile); 1.2 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | min. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | max. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | all samples, oat (Avena sativa), Polish retail and online stores2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | mean.Same samples: 0.25 µg/kg (minimum); 2.45 µg/kg (maximum); 0.31 µg/kg (percentile); 1.24 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | min. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | max. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, as soldBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20212009–2024 | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20222009–2024 | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldU.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | Dry Infant Cereals, FY20242009–2024 | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldKowalska 2021 | all samples2015–2018Dry weight | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldRubio et al. 2023 | Madeira marketCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study · 4 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | median. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | mean.Same samples: 0.13 µg/kg (minimum); 1.2 µg/kg (maximum); 0.3 µg/kg (percentile); 0.8 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | min. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | max. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, flour or mealBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
2 findings · 1 study · 4 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | median. | ||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | mean.Same samples: 0.51 µg/kg (minimum); 1.66 µg/kg (maximum); 0.83 µg/kg (percentile); 1.23 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | min. | ||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | max. | ||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
| Oat, peel or outer layerBielecka et al. 2022 | product subgroup2021 | percentile. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, cookedWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2015 | median. | ||
8 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Oat, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (LB)2003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (LB)2003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (UB)2003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2015 | EU Member State submissions to EFSA, all samples (UB)2003–2012 | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldMarques et al. 2021 | all samples2021 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMarques et al. 2021 | all samples2021 | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C7), measured by flame AASCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C7), measured by ICP-AESCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, flour or mealCaridi et al. 2021 | retail flour type S8, five samples from large retailers, ItalyCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
6 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Oat, as soldauthors 2025 | productCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, LB2000–2013 | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, LB2000–2013 | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, UB2000–2013 | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, UB2000–2013 | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldGood et al. 2026 | all brands (milk-type mean)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2005 | median. | ||
| Oat, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998 | median. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, as soldMarques et al. 2021 | all samples2021 | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldMarques et al. 2021 | all samples2021 | not detected. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, as soldMarques et al. 2021 | all samples2021 | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldMarques et al. 2021 | all samples2021 | not detected. | ||
9 findings · 5 studies | ||||
| Oat, as soldBegday et al. 2026 | commercial retail productCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldGood et al. 2026 | all brands (milk-type mean)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldShaikh et al. 2025 | retail brand ACollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldShaikh et al. 2025 | retail brand ACollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldShaikh et al. 2025 | retail brand BCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldShaikh et al. 2025 | retail brand BCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C7), measured by flame AASCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldAltwaiq et al. 2019 | cereal or bread sample, Amman market (C7), measured by ICP-AESCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | zone of intensive farming, Right-bank Forest-steppe, UkraineCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, flour or mealCaridi et al. 2021 | retail flour type S8, five samples from large retailers, ItalyCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, as soldGood et al. 2026 | all brands (milk-type mean)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, flour or mealCaridi et al. 2021 | retail flour type S8, five samples from large retailers, ItalyCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
3 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Oat, as soldGood et al. 2026 | all brands (milk-type mean)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldMarques et al. 2021 | all samples2021 | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldMarques et al. 2021 | all samples2021 | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, flour or mealCaridi et al. 2021 | retail flour type S8, five samples from large retailers, ItalyCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
7 findings · 4 studies | ||||
| Oat, as soldBegday et al. 2026 | commercial retail productCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldGood et al. 2026 | all brands (milk-type mean)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Oat, as soldShaikh et al. 2025 | retail brand ACollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldShaikh et al. 2025 | retail brand ACollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Oat, as soldShaikh et al. 2025 | retail brand BCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldShaikh et al. 2025 | retail brand BCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldRazanov et al. 2019 | zone of intensive farming, Right-bank Forest-steppe, UkraineCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, flour or mealCaridi et al. 2021 | retail flour type S8, five samples from large retailers, ItalyCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, as soldMarques et al. 2021 | all samples2021 | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldMarques et al. 2021 | all samples2021 | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, flour or mealCaridi et al. 2021 | retail flour type S8, five samples from large retailers, ItalyCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, as soldMarques et al. 2021 | all samples2021 | not detected. | ||
| Oat, as soldMarques et al. 2021 | all samples2021 | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, flour or mealCaridi et al. 2021 | retail flour type S8, five samples from large retailers, ItalyCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, flour or mealCaridi et al. 2021 | retail flour type S8, five samples from large retailers, ItalyCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Oat, flour or mealCaridi et al. 2021 | retail flour type S8, five samples from large retailers, ItalyCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
Shared dataset methods and interpretation
Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.
HMI oat Pb reference · Oat, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI oat Pb reference · Oat, as sold. Oat, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 3.7–14 (bounded) | 20–47.7 (bounded) | 135–170 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | 4–11.5 (bounded) | 20–47.7 (bounded) | 135–170 (bounded) |
103 reference units; 6 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 87 | 17% |
| authors 2025 | 1 | 17% |
| Bielecka et al. 2022 | 1 | 17% |
| Marques et al. 2021 | 2 | 17% |
| Shaikh et al. 2025 | 3 | 17% |
| U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | 9 | 17% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
6 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
- WHO GEMS/Food
- authors 2025
- Bielecka et al. 2022
- Marques et al. 2021
- Shaikh et al. 2025
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-fde3e777ae46:ed3744fc470c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat Pb reference · Oat, flour or meal
Reference and scope
HMI oat Pb reference · Oat, flour or meal. Oat, flour or meal; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 55.4 | 55.4 | 55.4 |
| Alternative weighting | 55.4 | 55.4 | 55.4 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Bielecka et al. 2022 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, flour or meal on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Bielecka et al. 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for oat, flour or meal on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-c5a3a2b2d303:175528cdaec3
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat Pb reference · Oat, peel or outer layer
Reference and scope
HMI oat Pb reference · Oat, peel or outer layer. Oat, peel or outer layer; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 56.2 | 56.2 | 56.2 |
| Alternative weighting | 56.2 | 56.2 | 56.2 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Bielecka et al. 2022 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, peel or outer layer on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Bielecka et al. 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for oat, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-577ff4a90176:9b10c5780e6a
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat Pb reference · Oat, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI oat Pb reference · Oat, cooked. Oat, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤27 | ≤100 | ≤100 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤27 | ≤100 | ≤100 |
7 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 7 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for oat, cooked on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-c00aa65d496b:515590098c7c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat Cd reference · Oat, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI oat Cd reference · Oat, as sold. Oat, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 5 | 15.6–16 (bounded) | 200 |
| Alternative weighting | 5 | 15.6 | 200 |
91 reference units; 4 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 79 | 25% |
| authors 2025 | 1 | 25% |
| Shaikh et al. 2025 | 1 | 25% |
| U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | 10 | 25% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
4 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-f4c46fb1a24a:14e143f88f60
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat Cd reference · Oat, flour or meal
Reference and scope
HMI oat Cd reference · Oat, flour or meal. Oat, flour or meal; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 19.9 | 19.9 | 19.9 |
| Alternative weighting | 19.9 | 19.9 | 19.9 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Bielecka et al. 2022 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, flour or meal on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Bielecka et al. 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for oat, flour or meal on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-46508c67ccb6:937d9eeb27c6
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat Cd reference · Oat, peel or outer layer
Reference and scope
HMI oat Cd reference · Oat, peel or outer layer. Oat, peel or outer layer; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 50.4 | 50.4 | 50.4 |
| Alternative weighting | 50.4 | 50.4 | 50.4 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Bielecka et al. 2022 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, peel or outer layer on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Bielecka et al. 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for oat, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-84fea35af58f:936d30771409
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat Cd reference · Oat, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI oat Cd reference · Oat, cooked. Oat, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1–6 (bounded) | 10 | 50 |
| Alternative weighting | 1–6 (bounded) | 10 | 50 |
5 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 5 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for oat, cooked on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-af0e5a2ad3b7:3f2b2f616d8b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat tAs reference · Oat, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI oat tAs reference · Oat, as sold. Oat, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 3.5–8.37 (bounded) | 8.37–13 (bounded) | 21–29 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | 3.5–8.37 (bounded) | 8.37–13 (bounded) | 21–29 (bounded) |
59 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 47 | 33% |
| Bielecka et al. 2022 | 1 | 33% |
| U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024 | 11 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-71a391133bb8:dd40729d7830
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat tAs reference · Oat, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI oat tAs reference · Oat, as sold, dry weight. Oat, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤100 | ≤100 | ≤100 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤100 | ≤100 | ≤100 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Kowalska 2021 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Kowalska 2021 is the only compatible sampling family for oat, as sold on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-87df030283e6:1452725d83b9
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat tAs reference · Oat, flour or meal
Reference and scope
HMI oat tAs reference · Oat, flour or meal. Oat, flour or meal; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 10.5 | 10.5 | 10.5 |
| Alternative weighting | 10.5 | 10.5 | 10.5 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Bielecka et al. 2022 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, flour or meal on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Bielecka et al. 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for oat, flour or meal on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-e1a4b20a2298:ff4b5c19ef0b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat tAs reference · Oat, peel or outer layer
Reference and scope
HMI oat tAs reference · Oat, peel or outer layer. Oat, peel or outer layer; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤8.29 | 8.29 | 8.29–24.5 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤8.29 | 8.29 | 8.29–24.5 (bounded) |
11 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 10 | 50% |
| Bielecka et al. 2022 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, peel or outer layer on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-a275a518909d:d100a3a0b3f1
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat tAs reference · Oat, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI oat tAs reference · Oat, cooked. Oat, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.02 | ≤0.51 | ≤1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.02 | ≤0.51 | ≤1 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for oat, cooked on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-cdf7be272b9e:ead4613ff8e7
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat iAs reference · Oat, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI oat iAs reference · Oat, as sold. Oat, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤9.95 | ≤10 | 12.4–17.8 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤9.89 | ≤10 | 12–20 (bounded) |
16 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 16 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for oat, as sold on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-5b73eb479465:db8a255640fb
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat iAs reference · Oat, peel or outer layer
Reference and scope
HMI oat iAs reference · Oat, peel or outer layer. Oat, peel or outer layer; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, peel or outer layer on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for oat, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-c5c5571c9ca4:dc7bb5a1fd71
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat iAs reference · Oat, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI oat iAs reference · Oat, cooked. Oat, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.02 | ≤0.02 | ≤0.02 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.02 | ≤0.02 | ≤0.02 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for oat, cooked on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-beb387c9969f:6f94c1cc1ac9
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat DMA reference · Oat, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI oat DMA reference · Oat, as sold. Oat, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤20 | ≤20 | ≤20 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for oat, as sold on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-06274a796fde:3cd7c33246b4
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat tHg reference · Oat, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI oat tHg reference · Oat, as sold. Oat, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.62 | 0.62 | 0.62–5 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.62 | 0.62 | 0.62–4.5 (bounded) |
33 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 32 | 50% |
| Bielecka et al. 2022 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-3846840f8d6d:de8e44bf18b8
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat tHg reference · Oat, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI oat tHg reference · Oat, as sold, dry weight. Oat, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤5 | ≤5 | ≤5 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤5 | ≤5 | ≤5 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Kowalska 2021 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Kowalska 2021 is the only compatible sampling family for oat, as sold on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-57e85643e998:8c353f5602e4
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat tHg reference · Oat, flour or meal
Reference and scope
HMI oat tHg reference · Oat, flour or meal. Oat, flour or meal; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.47 |
| Alternative weighting | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.47 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Bielecka et al. 2022 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, flour or meal on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Bielecka et al. 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for oat, flour or meal on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-b9fb972d42d4:92643f399f33
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat tHg reference · Oat, peel or outer layer
Reference and scope
HMI oat tHg reference · Oat, peel or outer layer. Oat, peel or outer layer; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1.11 | 1.11 | 1.11 |
| Alternative weighting | 1.11 | 1.11 | 1.11 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Bielecka et al. 2022 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, peel or outer layer on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Bielecka et al. 2022 is the only compatible sampling family for oat, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-ac5c2ef8aedf:77d40ebe4e5e
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat tHg reference · Oat, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI oat tHg reference · Oat, cooked. Oat, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.1 | ≤6 | ≤50 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.1 | ≤6 | ≤50 |
3 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 3 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for oat, cooked on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-ed8fc972336e:c8fa6819139c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat Ni reference · Oat, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI oat Ni reference · Oat, as sold. Oat, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤50 | 44.5–69.5 (bounded) | 89 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤50 | 44.5–69.5 (bounded) | 89 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Marques et al. 2021 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Marques et al. 2021 is the only compatible sampling family for oat, as sold on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-72733f8c4e12:ac633e4fc8ec
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat Cr reference · Oat, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI oat Cr reference · Oat, as sold. Oat, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Alternative weighting | 30 | 30 | 30 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| authors 2025 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
authors 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for oat, as sold on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-188382906385:1976312830a8
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat Sn reference · Oat, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI oat Sn reference · Oat, as sold. Oat, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤20 | 10–40 (bounded) | 20–60 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤20 | 10–40 (bounded) | 20–60 (bounded) |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for oat, as sold on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-f2d734fcafd3:cc51e0552b65
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat U reference · Oat, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI oat U reference · Oat, as sold. Oat, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤25 | ≤25 | ≤25 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤25 | ≤25 | ≤25 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Marques et al. 2021 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Marques et al. 2021 is the only compatible sampling family for oat, as sold on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-aae640d710f3:becf5955a242
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat Co reference · Oat, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI oat Co reference · Oat, as sold. Oat, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤25 | ≤25 | ≤25 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤25 | ≤25 | ≤25 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Marques et al. 2021 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Marques et al. 2021 is the only compatible sampling family for oat, as sold on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-0cf690f590ae:183993d6d03b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat Cu reference · Oat, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI oat Cu reference · Oat, as sold. Oat, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 5300 | 6450 | 7600 |
| Alternative weighting | 5300 | 6450 | 7600 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Shaikh et al. 2025 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Shaikh et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for oat, as sold on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-50ee743f31a8:f733317ac9f1
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat Mn reference · Oat, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI oat Mn reference · Oat, as sold. Oat, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 665 | 668 | 671 |
| Alternative weighting | 665 | 668 | 671 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Marques et al. 2021 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Marques et al. 2021 is the only compatible sampling family for oat, as sold on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-078c9d72d7af:2bfe0f90f47b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat Zn reference · Oat, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI oat Zn reference · Oat, as sold. Oat, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 20000 | 20000 | 20000 |
| Alternative weighting | 20000 | 20000 | 20000 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Shaikh et al. 2025 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Shaikh et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for oat, as sold on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-33a0183dec63:e49955d25d13
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat V reference · Oat, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI oat V reference · Oat, as sold. Oat, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Marques et al. 2021 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Marques et al. 2021 is the only compatible sampling family for oat, as sold on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-ef53a88e8e36:728ab143f202
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI oat Hg reference · Oat, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI oat Hg reference · Oat, as sold. Oat, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Marques et al. 2021 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for oat, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Marques et al. 2021 is the only compatible sampling family for oat, as sold on this basis in the completed oat ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:oat-dcf665fb9acc:9394029217f9
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
The source reports only a percentile, range or maximum for these samples, with no mean or median to place against the reference. Spread figures that do have a mean or median are shown on that row instead.
The value could not be reconciled with its own paper, so it is shown but not compared.
The result is below a reporting limit, and the range from zero to that limit crosses more than one band.
No medians or sample values exist for this form and metal, so no HMI reference could be built.
The HMI reference for this form has fewer than four units or no measurable spread, below the display minimum.
The result is on a basis (dry weight, or not stated) that no HMI reference for this form uses, so it cannot be placed.
Reporting limits overlap the study comparison, so no direction can be shown.
No findings match these filters. Change the selection or reset to show all source findings.
How metals reach oat
The evidence on how metals reach oat comes from studies that compared exposed and ordinary settings. Oat, as sold from retail brand A had lead higher at 2,800 µg/kg, against 1,100 µg/kg for retail brand A in the same study.7Quantitative Determination of Heavy Metals in Ready to Eat Food ProductsInternational Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR) 7(6), November-December 2025Read source →
These are observational comparisons from single studies; the size of the difference depends on the site, metal and distance.
Which forms and regions measured lower
The HMI reference for lead in oat, as sold pools 103 subgroup units from 6 sampling families, with a median of between 20 and 47.7 µg/kg and a middle half spanning between 3.7 and 14 (lower quartile) and between 135 and 170 µg/kg (upper quartile).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Evaluation of Concentrations and Health Risk Assessment of Cadmium, Lead, Chromium and Arsenic inPeer-reviewed articleRead source →4Gluten-Free Cereals and Pseudocereals as a Potential Source of Exposure to Toxic Elements among Polish ResidentsNutrients 2022, 14, 2342Read source →6Essential and Non-essential Trace Elements in Milks and Plant-Based DrinksBiological Trace Element ResearchRead source →7Quantitative Determination of Heavy Metals in Ready to Eat Food ProductsInternational Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR) 7(6), November-December 2025Read source →11Analytical Results for Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury in Food Intended for Babies and Young Children - TEP (FY2009-FY2024)FDA analytical results tableRead source → For lead in oat, cooked, the reference median was below 100 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 27 to below 100 µg/kg across 7 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium in oat, as sold, the reference median was between 15.6 and 16 µg/kg, with a middle half from 5 to 200 µg/kg across 91 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Evaluation of Concentrations and Health Risk Assessment of Cadmium, Lead, Chromium and Arsenic inPeer-reviewed articleRead source →7Quantitative Determination of Heavy Metals in Ready to Eat Food ProductsInternational Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR) 7(6), November-December 2025Read source →11Analytical Results for Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury in Food Intended for Babies and Young Children - TEP (FY2009-FY2024)FDA analytical results tableRead source →
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, oat, as sold had the lowest cadmium subgroup median in PAHO (6.9 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (100 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For inorganic arsenic, the lowest regional median was in PAHO (10.3 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (230 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Targeted oat, as sold samples in EURO had cadmium lower at 14 µg/kg, against 18 µg/kg for EURO in the same study.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
In one study, lead across 9 groups of oat ranged from 3 µg/kg (Dry Infant Cereals, FY2020) to 8 µg/kg (Dry Infant Cereals, FY2020); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.11Analytical Results for Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury in Food Intended for Babies and Young Children - TEP (FY2009-FY2024)FDA analytical results tableRead source → In another study, cadmium across 9 groups of oat ranged from 20.7 µg/kg (US baby-food manufacturer B, ingredient lot, test date 1/16/2018) to 102 µg/kg (US baby-food manufacturer C); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.12Baby Foods Are Tainted with Dangerous Levels of Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and MercuryStaff ReportRead source →
Processing, cooking and preparation
Processed or prepared forms were compared only with unprocessed oat in the same study and group. Oat, flour or meal (product subgroup) had lead higher at 55.4 µg/kg, against 47.7 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (oat, as sold).4Gluten-Free Cereals and Pseudocereals as a Potential Source of Exposure to Toxic Elements among Polish ResidentsNutrients 2022, 14, 2342Read source → In another study, oat, cooked (EURO) had cadmium higher at 35 µg/kg, against 15 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (oat, as sold).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Forms differ in water content, so a per-kilogram difference is not by itself a measured removal or gain of metal.
Mitigation for oat
Lot testing against the applicable limit is the check that can be verified.
No measured way to lower metals in this food is in the library yet.
Trade-offs and limits of controls
Avoiding exposed growing areas lowered the metal measured in the studies available, but no study measured the cost or supply effect of doing so.7Quantitative Determination of Heavy Metals in Ready to Eat Food ProductsInternational Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR) 7(6), November-December 2025Read source → Metals do not move together, so a lot that passes a lead limit says little about cadmium, arsenic or nickel unless those are tested as well.
Testing oat for metals
Results depend on the method and its reporting limit. Reporting limits for lead ranged from 1 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 200 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Reporting limits for cadmium ranged from 0.7 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 100 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Reporting limits for total arsenic ranged from 0.019 µg/kg (Bielecka et al. 2022) to 1,000 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →4Gluten-Free Cereals and Pseudocereals as a Potential Source of Exposure to Toxic Elements among Polish ResidentsNutrients 2022, 14, 2342Read source →
A useful lot result names the form, the basis and a quantification limit well below the limit that applies.
Buying and verifying oat
No maximum level for metals in oat was verified from primary text for this page; buyers should confirm the limit that applies in the destination market.
Exposure from oat
No source in the library converted oat concentrations into a verified estimate of intake for a defined population. Concentrations describe the food, not individual risk.
Evidence review and remaining gaps
Every source record that names oat was decided on its content: 25 occurrence extracted, 25 records in all. The occurrence table renders every extracted result; held values remain visible with their reason.
References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.
Oat FAQs
What heavy metals are found in oat?
The library reports lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, tin, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Ca, Hg, Mg, Na and P in oat, most often lead, cadmium and total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Evaluation of Concentrations and Health Risk Assessment of Cadmium, Lead, Chromium and Arsenic inPeer-reviewed articleRead source →3Integral assessment of the environmental safety of plant-based milk alternatives based on heavy metal analysisIzvestiya KGTU (KSTU News)Read source →4Gluten-Free Cereals and Pseudocereals as a Potential Source of Exposure to Toxic Elements among Polish ResidentsNutrients 2022, 14, 2342Read source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in oat, as sold from 1,272 results in 3 reporting regions, with a subgroup median of 10 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
How do heavy metals get into oat?
In the studies available, oat from contaminated or exposed settings carried more metal than oat from the same study’s control.7Quantitative Determination of Heavy Metals in Ready to Eat Food ProductsInternational Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR) 7(6), November-December 2025Read source → Oat, as sold from retail brand A had lead higher at 2,800 µg/kg, against 1,100 µg/kg for retail brand A in the same study.7Quantitative Determination of Heavy Metals in Ready to Eat Food ProductsInternational Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR) 7(6), November-December 2025Read source →
Which regions report the lowest levels in oat?
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, oat, as sold had the lowest cadmium subgroup median in PAHO (6.9 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (100 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For inorganic arsenic, the lowest regional median was in PAHO (10.3 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (230 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Does processing change heavy metals in oat?
Only comparisons between forms in the same study are available, not before-and-after measurements of the same oat.4Gluten-Free Cereals and Pseudocereals as a Potential Source of Exposure to Toxic Elements among Polish ResidentsNutrients 2022, 14, 2342Read source → Oat, flour or meal (product subgroup) had lead higher at 55.4 µg/kg, against 47.7 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (oat, as sold).4Gluten-Free Cereals and Pseudocereals as a Potential Source of Exposure to Toxic Elements among Polish ResidentsNutrients 2022, 14, 2342Read source →
How much of the arsenic in oat is inorganic?
Inorganic arsenic, the more toxic form, was measured in 13 results from 2 sources, far fewer than total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →13Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597Read source → European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 reported inorganic arsenic at 14.2 µg/kg (mean) in oat, as sold from European dietary-survey occurrence data.13Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597Read source →
References
Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.
- GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsDataset
- Evaluation of Concentrations and Health Risk Assessment of Cadmium, Lead, Chromium and Arsenic inPeer-reviewed
- Integral assessment of the environmental safety of plant-based milk alternatives based on heavy metal analysisPeer-reviewed
- Gluten-Free Cereals and Pseudocereals as a Potential Source of Exposure to Toxic Elements among Polish ResidentsPeer-reviewed
- Comparative exposure and risk assessment of heavy metals, nutrients, and organochlorine pesticides in cow and plant-based milksPeer-reviewed
- Essential and Non-essential Trace Elements in Milks and Plant-Based DrinksPeer-reviewed
- Quantitative Determination of Heavy Metals in Ready to Eat Food ProductsPeer-reviewed
- Evaluation of the Radiological and Chemical Risk for Public Health from Flour Sample InvestigationPeer-reviewed
- A study on heavy metal content in rolled oats available in domestic market in IndiaPeer-reviewed
- Dietary Exposure to Toxic Metals (Cd, Pb and Hg) from Cereals Marketed in Madeira and the AzoresPeer-reviewed
- Analytical Results for Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury in Food Intended for Babies and Young Children - TEP (FY2009-FY2024)Dataset
- Baby Foods Are Tainted with Dangerous Levels of Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and MercuryGray literature
- Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationGovernment
Sources
Browse Oat Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.
Update history
22 October 2026: Rebuilt from every oat record in the library: 25 occurrence sources, references by form and basis, same-study contrasts.
