Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index
Rolled oats, oatmeal, granola, oat rings and bran cereal with raisins illustrating breakfast cereals product-format context.

Heavy metals in Breakfast Cereals

Grain based breakfast foods are covered through a literature inventory that distinguishes finished product measurements from broader dietary and ingredient context.

Compare values only when the product form, measurement basis, and metal species match.

21 related source records are associated with this category. This is a coverage count, not a measure of scientific confidence. References identify works cited in the text.

Overview

The narrative and the evidence summary on this page grow as studies are catalogued.

Who this page is for

This page is for brand legal, retailer-compliance, and regulator readers who need the current literature record for Breakfast Cereals. It is a public evidence surface, not a certification-threshold table. Readers should use it to see which cited sources actually support this product row and to keep row fit, market, basis, and analyte species visible.

Evidence summary

Pending: regenerated by tools/evidence/apply-product-hmtc-evidence-summaries.mjs once sources route and the pooling engine emits aggregate rows for this product category.

Source Evidence Inventory

At this synthesis stage, the inventory is used to distinguish direct finished-product occurrence data from broader dietary, ingredient, exposure, or review context. Sources that do not resolve product form, jurisdiction, basis, or analyte species remain visible here but should not be treated as benchmark-ready rows until structured extraction and routing confirm fit.

Supporting evidence and scope

Pending: regenerated by tools/evidence/apply-product-broad-context.mjs once broad-scope sources route to this page.

Federal/Regulatory Limits vs Field Findings

Pending: regenerated by tools/apply-product-crosswalk-sections.mjs once applicable_regulations are identified and field-finding evidence is pooled.

Controls and mitigation

The practical control levers for Breakfast Cereals start with product identity and lot-level evidence: keep the product form, ingredient contributors, market, and analytical basis attached to each test result. Sourcing and formulation controls should focus on ingredients or mineral/colorant/botanical inputs named by the routed sources, while finished-product testing remains the check on combined formulation, processing, and packaging effects. Where the current sources are review or exposure-context sources, the immediate lever is better row-specific occurrence testing rather than broad cross-category inference.

How standards math uses this page

This page reports what the peer-reviewed and government literature says about heavy-metal concentrations in this product category; it publishes no certification thresholds of its own. Certification criteria are set separately under the Heavy Metal Tested & Certified program at heavymetalcertified.com, which reads this page as its literature baseline. The two are kept apart by design, so this page remains an independent record of the evidence rather than a justification for any threshold.

Historical recalls and enforcement

No row-specific public recall or enforcement synthesis has been promoted for Breakfast Cereals in this pass. Regulatory references on this page should be read as context unless a source ties an event to this exact product scope and analyte. Future enforcement prose should remain event-framed and should not convert source mentions into brand rankings.

Methodology

This page follows the Part 6 product-page rules: values stay in the source-reported basis, non-detect handling follows the source, and analyte species are not substituted. Produce and food evidence is kept jurisdiction- and market-aware, with fresh, dried, canned, infused, or processed forms separated when basis changes. This page reports the literature; certification thresholds are set separately under the certification program, not on this page.

Sources

Source records associated with this topic. Inclusion does not establish that every finding applies to this product or ingredient. References above identify works cited in the text.

#CitationYearTypeUsed on this page for
1ANSES 2026. Opinion of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety on the results of the Third French Total Diet Study (TDS3) - Acrylamide, aluminium, silver, cadmium, mercury and lead, ANSES Opinion, Request No 2019-SA-00102026Government reportContribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope.
2Hassan et al. 2025. Cornflakes as a source of dietary metal exposure in Lebanon: Risk assessment and regulatory compliance, RSC Advances2025Peer-reviewedContribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope.
3Salahel et al. 2025. Assessment of toxic heavy metals in commonly consumed foods in Egypt and their implications for public health and safety, Scientific Reports, 15: 431072025Peer-reviewedContribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope.
4EU 2024. Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/1987 of 30 July 2024 amending Regulation (EU) 2023/915 as regards maximum levels of nickel in certain foodstuffs, Official Journal of the European Union, L series, 2024/1987 (31.7.2024)2024RegulationContribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope.
5EU 2024. Commission Recommendation (EU) 2024/907 of 22 March 2024 on the monitoring of nickel in food, Official Journal of the European Union, L series, 2024/907 (26.3.2024)2024RegulationContribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope.
6Oduro et al. 2023. Health risks of potentially toxic metals in cereal-based breakfast meals in the Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana, Discover Food 3:252023Peer-reviewedContribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope.
7Saraiva et al. 2021. Speciation analysis of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) in bread and breakfast cereals using species-specific isotope dilution and HPLC-ICP-MS, Journal of Food Composition and Analysis2021Peer-reviewedContribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope.
8Schaefer et al. 2020. Cadmium: Mitigation strategies to reduce dietary exposure, Journal of Food Science2020ReviewContribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope.
9Hernandez et al. 2019. Cr(VI) and Cr(III) in milk, dairy and cereal products and dietary exposure assessment, Food Additives & Contaminants Part B: Surveillance2019Peer-reviewedContribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope.
10Pillay et al. 2018. Heavy metal toxins in breakfast cereals - a baseline study using hybrid plasma mass spectrometry, Journal of Analytical & Pharmaceutical Research 2018; 7(4): 478-4822018Peer-reviewedContribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope.
11Abebe et al. 2017. Assessment of essential and non-essential metals in popcorn and cornflake commercially available in Ethiopia, Chemistry International 3(3):268-2762017Peer-reviewedContribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope.
12EFSA 2015. Scientific Opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of nickel in food and drinking water, EFSA Journal 2015;13(2):4002, 202 pp.2015Government reportContribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope.
13Baxter et al. 2015. Total Diet Study of metals and other elements in food, Food and Environment Research Agency report for the UK Food Standards Agency, Fera report 15/06, project FS1020812015Government reportContribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope.
14UK Committee on Toxicity 2013. Statement on the potential risks from aluminium in the infant diet, Committee on Toxicity (COT), Statement 2013/01, June 20132013Government reportContribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope.
15EFSA 2012. Cadmium dietary exposure in the European population, EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):25512012Government reportContribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope.
16EFSA 2010. Scientific Opinion on Lead in Food, EFSA Journal 2010;8(4):15702010Government reportContribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope.
17Committee on Toxicity of 2008. COT Statement on the 2006 UK Total Diet Study of Metals and Other Elements, Committee on Toxicity statement2008Government reportContribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope.
18JECFA 2007. Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants — Sixty-seventh report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, WHO Technical Report Series 940 (Sixty-seventh meeting of JECFA, Rome, 20-29 June 2006)2007Government reportContribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope.
19EC 2004. Assessment of the dietary exposure to arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury of the population of the EU Member States, Reports on tasks for scientific cooperation, SCOOP Task 3.2.112004Government reportContribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope.
20Committee on Toxicity of 2003. Statement on arsenic in food: results of the 1999 Total Diet Study, Committee on Toxicity statement2003Government reportContribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope.
21Dabeka et al. 1995. Survey of Lead, Cadmium, Fluoride, Nickel, and Cobalt in Food Composites and Estimation of Dietary Intakes of These Elements by Canadians in 1986-1988, Journal of AOAC International1995Peer-reviewedContribution to this topic remains under review; see the source record for its reported scope.

Update history

No substantive edit history is available in this build. The full commit record is available in git.