Cabbage in the HMI library has 944 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ag, arsenic (As), Ba, mercury (Hg), Mo, Sr, Ti and Tl from 51 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Heavy metal(oid)s concentration in Tehran supermarket vegetables: carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessmentToxin ReviewsRead source →4Assessment of the potential health risks associated with the aluminium, arsenic, cadmium and lead content in selected fruits and vegetables grown in JamaicaToxicology Reports 4 (2017) 181-187Read source →5Probabilistic carcinogenic and health risk assessment of heavy metals in lettuce and cabbage from Behbahan, Iran, using Monte Carlo simulationScientific ReportsRead source →6Total and bioaccessible heavy metals in cabbagePeer-reviewed articleRead source →
-
Metals measured:
Lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury and nickel and others, in 944 results from 51 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Heavy metal(oid)s concentration in Tehran supermarket vegetables: carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessmentToxin ReviewsRead source →4Assessment of the potential health risks associated with the aluminium, arsenic, cadmium and lead content in selected fruits and vegetables grown in JamaicaToxicology Reports 4 (2017) 181-187Read source →
-
Main drivers:
Cabbage, as sold from Moldova Noua (mining area M) (mining-affected area) had lead higher at 250 µg/kg, against 50 µg/kg for Borlova (reference area) in the same study.7Application of principal component analysis in the pollution assessment with heavy metals of vegetable food chain in the old mining areasChemistry Central Journal6:156Read source →
-
Practical framing:
Ask for lot results with a quantification limit well below the limit that applies in the destination market.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Heavy metal(oid)s concentration in Tehran supermarket vegetables: carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessmentToxin ReviewsRead source →4Assessment of the potential health risks associated with the aluminium, arsenic, cadmium and lead content in selected fruits and vegetables grown in JamaicaToxicology Reports 4 (2017) 181-187Read source →
Cabbage overview
Cabbage in the HMI library has 944 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ag, As, Ba, Hg, Mo, Sr, Ti and Tl from 51 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Heavy metal(oid)s concentration in Tehran supermarket vegetables: carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessmentToxin ReviewsRead source →4Assessment of the potential health risks associated with the aluminium, arsenic, cadmium and lead content in selected fruits and vegetables grown in JamaicaToxicology Reports 4 (2017) 181-187Read source →5Probabilistic carcinogenic and health risk assessment of heavy metals in lettuce and cabbage from Behbahan, Iran, using Monte Carlo simulationScientific ReportsRead source →6Total and bioaccessible heavy metals in cabbagePeer-reviewed articleRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in cabbage, as sold from 3,881 results in 5 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 2.3 to 185 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In the US Total Diet Study, cabbage, as sold had a median lead result below 4 µg/kg across 27 composites from 2017–2020.2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →
Across 10 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported lead means and medians on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis ranged from 3 µg/kg (Antoine et al. 2017) to 1,660 µg/kg (Guerra et al. 2012).4Assessment of the potential health risks associated with the aluminium, arsenic, cadmium and lead content in selected fruits and vegetables grown in JamaicaToxicology Reports 4 (2017) 181-187Read source →8Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source → For cadmium, 11 studies on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis reported means and medians from 3 µg/kg (Alimohammadi et al. 2018) to 350 µg/kg (authors 2021).3Heavy metal(oid)s concentration in Tehran supermarket vegetables: carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessmentToxin ReviewsRead source →6Total and bioaccessible heavy metals in cabbagePeer-reviewed articleRead source → Higher results came from contaminated or exposed settings rather than ordinary supply. Cabbage, as sold from Ruschita (mining area R) (mining-affected area) had lead higher at 900 µg/kg, against 50 µg/kg for Borlova (reference area) in the same study.7Application of principal component analysis in the pollution assessment with heavy metals of vegetable food chain in the old mining areasChemistry Central Journal6:156Read source →
For a buyer the practical points are the form bought, the basis a result is reported on, where the cabbage came from and the laboratory’s reporting limit. Testing finds contamination but does not remove it.
What counts as cabbage
This page covers cabbage, as sold (944 results).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Heavy metal(oid)s concentration in Tehran supermarket vegetables: carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessmentToxin ReviewsRead source →4Assessment of the potential health risks associated with the aluminium, arsenic, cadmium and lead content in selected fruits and vegetables grown in JamaicaToxicology Reports 4 (2017) 181-187Read source →5Probabilistic carcinogenic and health risk assessment of heavy metals in lettuce and cabbage from Behbahan, Iran, using Monte Carlo simulationScientific ReportsRead source →6Total and bioaccessible heavy metals in cabbagePeer-reviewed articleRead source →
Results stay on the basis each source reports: as sold or fresh weight, dry weight, or unstated. Dry-weight, as-sold and unstated results are never pooled, and no moisture conversion is applied.
Heavy metal contamination profile of cabbage
The table holds every extracted cabbage result: one row for each statistic a source reports for a form, group and metal, 944 rows in all, grouped by metal and form; percentiles, ranges and maxima for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Heavy metal(oid)s concentration in Tehran supermarket vegetables: carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessmentToxin ReviewsRead source →4Assessment of the potential health risks associated with the aluminium, arsenic, cadmium and lead content in selected fruits and vegetables grown in JamaicaToxicology Reports 4 (2017) 181-187Read source →5Probabilistic carcinogenic and health risk assessment of heavy metals in lettuce and cabbage from Behbahan, Iran, using Monte Carlo simulationScientific ReportsRead source →6Total and bioaccessible heavy metals in cabbagePeer-reviewed articleRead source → Monitoring medians are HMI calculations from individual submissions; non-detects remain intervals between zero and the reporting limit and are never read as zero.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
494 rows can be rated against an HMI reference for the same form and basis, 44 rows have a direct same-study comparison, and the rest stay unrated with the reason recorded. 39 values from 13 sources failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.5Probabilistic carcinogenic and health risk assessment of heavy metals in lettuce and cabbage from Behbahan, Iran, using Monte Carlo simulationScientific ReportsRead source →7Application of principal component analysis in the pollution assessment with heavy metals of vegetable food chain in the old mining areasChemistry Central Journal6:156Read source →9Determination of heavy metals in selected vegetables from markets in Tamale Metropolis, GhanaInternational Journal of Food ContaminationRead source →10Environmental surveillance of commonly-grown vegetables for investigating potential lead and chromium contamination intensification in BangladeshSpringerPlusRead source →11Detection of heavy metals concentration in vegetables andPeer-reviewed articleRead source →12Analysis of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs and an Assessment of the Health Risks to the General Public via Consumption in Beijing, ChinaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthRead source →13Analysis of Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals in Water, Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) and Tilapia Fish (Oreochromis niloticus) from Unreclaimed Mining PitsEarth Sciences PakistanRead source →14Heavy Metals in Commonly Consumed Root and Leafy Vegetables in Dhaka City, Bangladesh, and Assessment of Associated Public Health RisksEnvironmental Systems ResearchRead source →15Compound health risk assessment of cumulative heavy metal exposure: A case study of a village near a battery factory in Henan Province, ChinaEnvironmental Science: Processes & ImpactsRead source →16Contamination and health risk assessment of lead, arsenic, cadmium, and aluminum from a total diet study of Jilin Province, ChinaFood Science & NutritionRead source →17Accumulation of potentially toxic trace elements in vegetables collected from selected vegetable-based cropping systems in Sri Lanka, and estimation of their dietary intakesJournal of Dry Zone Agriculture 2025, 11(1):1-16Read source →18Levels and potential health risk of heavy metals in marketed vegetables in Zhejiang, ChinaScientific ReportsRead source →19Determination of some heavy metals and their potential risk in selected vegetables on sale within Kaduna Metropolis, Kaduna State, NigeriaWorld NutritionRead source →
Comparison methods and scope
Each row is one statistic a source reports for one form of cabbage, group and metal; percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Different forms and preparation states are kept apart, and dry-weight results never share a reference with as-sold or fresh-weight results. Ratings place a result against an HMI reference built from monitoring results and ordinary-setting medians for the same form and basis. Same-study contrasts compare a contaminated or treated site with its control, targeted with random sampling, a prepared form with the unprocessed one, or one group of a study with the median of its other groups. Held rows failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.
First displayed analyte: Lead: 144 findings from 45 sources. Each row retains its statistic and measurement basis.
Filter findings
898 of 898 findings · 26 analytes
About this table
| Food form | Collection scope | Finding (µg/kg) | Comparison | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
135 findings · 45 studies · 9 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | AFRO2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2009–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO1999As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014–2015As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2000–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014–2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014–2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2012–2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2012As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2003–2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2003–2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018 | autumn 20162016As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018 | summer 20162016As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAntoine et al. 2017 | Jamaican-grown, markets and farms island-wide, all samplesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldArmand et al. 2026 | 10 retail vegetable storesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | range. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldArmand et al. 2026 | Behbahan retail vegetable stores (10 stores x 2 rounds)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2021 | all four cities (12 market composites)2018As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2021 | Wuding2018As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | amateur farmers; washed with 5% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | amateur farmers; washed with 10% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | amateur farmers; washed with tap water2021As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with 5% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with 10% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012 | Borlova (reference area)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012 | Moldova Noua (mining area M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012 | Ruschita (mining area R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market, Sao Paulo, August 2009; origin unknown2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011 | Borlova reference area (Ref)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011 | Moldova Noua old mining area (M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011 | Ruschita old mining area (R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | NE Britain (Aberdeenshire) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | NE Britain (Aberdeenshire) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 14.7 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | NE Britain (Aberdeenshire) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | NE Britain (Aberdeenshire) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 298 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023 | CON (conventional crop protection)2004–2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023 | FYM cattle manure fertilizer2004–2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023 | NPK mineral fertilizer2004–2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023 | ORG (organic crop protection)2004–2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023 | spring beans pre-crop2004–2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023 | winter barley pre-crop2004–2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSee et al. 2025 | Pasar Borong Selangor wet market2022As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2025 | all three growing areas pooled2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 400 µg/kg (minimum); 1,530 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldX-D et al. 2016 | species mean, Zhejiang Province, China2014As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2016–2017 | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAl 2010 | Vegetables, Riyadh city markets, May 20092009 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026 | leafy vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group I2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAMMM et al. 2016 | all samples (64 districts)Collection date unreported | median.Same samples: 2 µg/kg (minimum); 29,800 µg/kg (maximum); 12,700 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAMMM et al. 2016 | all samples (64 districts)Collection date unreported | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAMMM et al. 2016 | all samples (64 districts)Collection date unreported | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAMMM et al. 2016 | all samples (64 districts)Collection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAMMM et al. 2016 | Nationwide district samples, BangladeshCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025 | Akaki River-irrigated farmland (Addis Ababa)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025 | plant part: leavesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025 | plant part: shootCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldFonge et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldJitender et al. 2017 | wastewater-irrigated farmland, Hisar, three locations pooledCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldLiang et al. 2019 | Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNisa et al. 2020 | local market2019 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024 | dry season, control (Riyom)2019 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024 | dry season, mining-pit site2019 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024 | rainy season, control (Riyom)2019 | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024 | rainy season, mining-pit site2019 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOnakpa et al. 2022 | Gwagwalada Central Market, Abuja, July 20192019 | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOrosun et al. 2023 | Ilorin farms, all sites2021 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRani et al. 2025 | leaves vegetable2017–2018 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSamma et al. 2024 | six Bogura upazilas, compositesCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 6,930 µg/kg (minimum); 23,300 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSamma et al. 2024 | six Bogura upazilas, compositesCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSamma et al. 2024 | six Bogura upazilas, compositesCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | all three districts (mean of site means)2012 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | Bhaktapur district market sites (SBB)2012 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | Kathmandu district market sites (SKB)2012 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | Lalitpur district market sites (SLB)2012 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026 | Badulla (vegetable-paddy rotation, Ultisol)2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026 | Kalpitiya (vegetable-only cropping, coarse Entisol)2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026 | Nuwara Eliya (vegetable-only cropping, Ultisol)2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022 | 1st phase (early)Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022 | 2nd phase (mid)Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022 | 3rd phase (mid)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022 | 4th phase (late)Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022 | all four phasesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2012Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAbbas et al. 2010 | fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldJiang et al. 2020 | SZD village near a battery factory, Xinxiang, Henan2018Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldMawari et al. 2022 | Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldTalib 2018 | Iran-labelled origin, Najaf market2017Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldTalib 2018 | Iran-labelled origin, Najaf market2017Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldTalib 2018 | Iraq-labelled origin, Najaf market2017Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 1 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 2 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 3 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
128 findings · 43 studies · 10 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | AFRO2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2006As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2006As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2009–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO1999–2006As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2006As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO1999–2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2000–2010As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2002–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018 | autumn 20162016As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018 | summer 20162016As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAntoine et al. 2017 | Jamaican-grown, markets and farms island-wide, all samplesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldArmand et al. 2026 | 10 retail vegetable storesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | range. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldArmand et al. 2026 | Behbahan retail vegetable stores (10 stores x 2 rounds)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2021 | all four cities (12 market composites)2018As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2021 | Wuding2018As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | amateur farmers; washed with 5% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | amateur farmers; washed with 10% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | amateur farmers; washed with tap water2021As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with 5% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with 10% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldDearing et al. 2025 | genus Brassica2024As sold / fresh | median.Same samples: 93 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldDearing et al. 2025 | genus Brassica2024As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012 | Borlova (reference area)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012 | Moldova Noua (mining area M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012 | Ruschita (mining area R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market, Sao Paulo, August 2009; origin unknown2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011 | Borlova reference area (Ref)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011 | Moldova Noua old mining area (M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011 | Ruschita old mining area (R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | NE Britain (Aberdeenshire) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | NE Britain (Aberdeenshire) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | NE Britain (Aberdeenshire) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | NE Britain (Aberdeenshire) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 21.2 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015 | SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023 | CON (conventional crop protection)2004–2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023 | FYM cattle manure fertilizer2004–2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023 | NPK mineral fertilizer2004–2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023 | ORG (organic crop protection)2004–2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023 | spring beans pre-crop2004–2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023 | winter barley pre-crop2004–2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSee et al. 2025 | Pasar Borong Selangor wet market2022As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2025 | all three growing areas pooled2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 100 µg/kg (minimum); 240 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldX-D et al. 2016 | species mean, Zhejiang Province, China2014As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldX-D et al. 2016 | species mean, Zhejiang Province, China2014As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2016–2019 | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026 | leafy vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group I2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 40 µg/kg (minimum); 70 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo Markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | range. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAMMM et al. 2016 | all samples (64 districts)Collection date unreported | median.Same samples: 98 µg/kg (minimum); 1,110 µg/kg (maximum); 640 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAMMM et al. 2016 | all samples (64 districts)Collection date unreported | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAMMM et al. 2016 | all samples (64 districts)Collection date unreported | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAMMM et al. 2016 | all samples (64 districts)Collection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAMMM et al. 2016 | Nationwide district samples, BangladeshCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025 | Akaki River-irrigated farmland (Addis Ababa)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldFonge et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldLiang et al. 2019 | Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNisa et al. 2020 | local market2019 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024 | dry season, control (Riyom)2019 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024 | dry season, mining-pit site2019 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024 | rainy season, control (Riyom)2019 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024 | rainy season, mining-pit site2019 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOnakpa et al. 2022 | Gwagwalada Central Market, Abuja, July 20192019 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOrosun et al. 2023 | Ilorin farms, all sites2021 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRani et al. 2025 | leaves vegetable2017–2018 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | all three districts (mean of site means)2012 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | Bhaktapur district market sites (SBB)2012 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | Kathmandu district market sites (SKB)2012 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | Lalitpur district market sites (SLB)2012 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026 | Badulla (vegetable-paddy rotation, Ultisol)2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026 | Kalpitiya (vegetable-only cropping, coarse Entisol)2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026 | Nuwara Eliya (vegetable-only cropping, Ultisol)2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022 | 1st phase (early)Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022 | 2nd phase (mid)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022 | 3rd phase (mid)Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022 | 4th phase (late)Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022 | all four phasesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAbbas et al. 2010 | fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCantoral et al. 2024 | all samples (single foodstuff, duplicate mean)2022–2023Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldJiang et al. 2020 | SZD village near a battery factory, Xinxiang, Henan2018Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldMawari et al. 2022 | Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldTalib 2018 | Iran-labelled origin, Najaf market2017Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldTalib 2018 | Iran-labelled origin, Najaf market2017Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldTalib 2018 | Iraq-labelled origin, Najaf market2017Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 1 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 2 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 3 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
65 findings · 22 studies | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | AFRO2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2023As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2008–2015As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2012–2023As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2002–2003As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2002–2022As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2015As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2014–2023As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2022As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017–2023As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2022As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2004–2009As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018 | autumn 20162016As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018 | summer 20162016As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAntoine et al. 2017 | Jamaican-grown, markets and farms island-wide, all samplesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2021 | all four cities (12 market composites)2018As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2021 | four cities, range of city means2018As sold / fresh | range. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2025 | all three growing areas pooled2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2025 | all three growing areas pooled2018–2020As sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2025 | all three growing areas pooled2018–2020As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldX-D et al. 2016 | species mean, Zhejiang Province, China2014As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group I2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025 | Akaki River-irrigated farmland (Addis Ababa)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldFonge et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldLiang et al. 2019 | Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOrosun et al. 2023 | Ilorin farms, all sites2021 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | Bhaktapur district market sites (SBB)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | Kathmandu district market sites (SKB)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | Lalitpur district market sites (SLB)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026 | Badulla (vegetable-paddy rotation, Ultisol)2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026 | Kalpitiya (vegetable-only cropping, coarse Entisol)2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026 | Nuwara Eliya (vegetable-only cropping, Ultisol)2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAbbas et al. 2010 | fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldJiang et al. 2020 | SZD village near a battery factory, Xinxiang, Henan2018Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldMawari et al. 2022 | Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 1 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 2 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 3 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
11 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2010 | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012 | all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012 | all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012 | all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012 | all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
40 findings · 13 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | AFRO2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2004–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2004As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldDabeka et al. 2003 | Ottawa composite (retail Oct-Nov 2000)1998–2000As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldDabeka et al. 2003 | Whitehorse composite (retail Jan-Feb 1998)1998–2000As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 6.5 µg/kg (minimum); 11.5 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldX-D et al. 2016 | species mean, Zhejiang Province, China2014As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025 | Akaki River-irrigated farmland (Addis Ababa)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldLiang et al. 2019 | Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | Bhaktapur district market sites (SBB)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | Kathmandu district market sites (SKB)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | Lalitpur district market sites (SLB)2012 | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAbbas et al. 2010 | fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldJiang et al. 2020 | SZD village near a battery factory, Xinxiang, Henan2018Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldMawari et al. 2022 | Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
63 findings · 21 studies · 3 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018 | autumn 20162016As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018 | summer 20162016As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldArmand et al. 2026 | 10 retail vegetable storesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | range. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldArmand et al. 2026 | Behbahan retail vegetable stores (10 stores x 2 rounds)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldDearing et al. 2025 | genus Brassica2024As sold / fresh | median.Same samples: 270 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldDearing et al. 2025 | genus Brassica2024As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012 | Borlova (reference area)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012 | Moldova Noua (mining area M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012 | Ruschita (mining area R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market, Sao Paulo, August 2009; origin unknown2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011 | Borlova reference area (Ref)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011 | Moldova Noua old mining area (M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011 | Ruschita old mining area (R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023 | CON (conventional crop protection)2004–2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023 | FYM cattle manure fertilizer2004–2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023 | NPK mineral fertilizer2004–2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023 | ORG (organic crop protection)2004–2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023 | spring beans pre-crop2004–2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023 | winter barley pre-crop2004–2012As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 1,110 µg/kg (minimum); 2,950 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group I2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldFonge et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNisa et al. 2020 | local market2019 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024 | dry season, control (Riyom)2019 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024 | dry season, mining-pit site2019 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024 | rainy season, control (Riyom)2019 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024 | rainy season, mining-pit site2019 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOnakpa et al. 2022 | Gwagwalada Central Market, Abuja, July 20192019 | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRani et al. 2025 | leaves vegetable2017–2018 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022 | 1st phase (early)Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022 | 2nd phase (mid)Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022 | 3rd phase (mid)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022 | 4th phase (late)Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022 | all four phasesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldJiang et al. 2020 | SZD village near a battery factory, Xinxiang, Henan2018Basis not stated | mean. | ||
57 findings · 24 studies · 6 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018 | autumn 20162016As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018 | summer 20162016As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldArmand et al. 2026 | 10 retail vegetable storesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | range. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldArmand et al. 2026 | Behbahan retail vegetable stores (10 stores x 2 rounds)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2021 | all four cities (12 market composites)2018As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2021 | four cities, range2018As sold / fresh | range. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market, Sao Paulo, August 2009; origin unknown2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldReczajska et al. 2005 | all samples (three Polish agricultural areas)2001As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldReczajska et al. 2005 | all samples (three Polish agricultural areas)2001As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: up to 15 µg/kg (range; lowest below the limit); 10 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldReczajska et al. 2005 | all samples (three Polish agricultural areas)2001As sold / fresh | range. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldReczajska et al. 2005 | all samples (three Polish agricultural areas)2001As sold / fresh | percentile. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSee et al. 2025 | Pasar Borong Selangor wet market2022As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group I2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 30 µg/kg (minimum); 470 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo Markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | range. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAMMM et al. 2016 | all samples (64 districts)Collection date unreported | median.Same samples: 2,140 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAMMM et al. 2016 | all samples (64 districts)Collection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAMMM et al. 2016 | Nationwide district samples, BangladeshCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAMMM et al. 2016 | Nationwide district samples, BangladeshCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025 | Akaki River-irrigated farmland (Addis Ababa)Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025 | plant part: leavesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025 | plant part: shootCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldFonge et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldLiang et al. 2019 | Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOnakpa et al. 2022 | Gwagwalada Central Market, Abuja, July 20192019 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOrosun et al. 2023 | Ilorin farms, all sites2021 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRani et al. 2025 | leaves vegetable2017–2018 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSamma et al. 2024 | six Bogura upazilas, compositesCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 3,100 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSamma et al. 2024 | six Bogura upazilas, compositesCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSamma et al. 2024 | six Bogura upazilas, compositesCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022 | 1st phase (early)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022 | 2nd phase (mid)Collection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022 | 3rd phase (mid)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022 | 4th phase (late)Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022 | all four phasesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldJiang et al. 2020 | SZD village near a battery factory, Xinxiang, Henan2018Basis not stated | mean. | ||
12 findings · 7 studies | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldAntoine et al. 2017 | Jamaican-grown, markets and farms island-wide, all samplesCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSee et al. 2025 | Pasar Borong Selangor wet market2022As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group I2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRani et al. 2025 | leaves vegetable2017–2018 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
26 findings · 4 studies | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
24 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
27 findings · 7 studies | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market, Sao Paulo, August 2009; origin unknown2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group I2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldFonge et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNisa et al. 2020 | local market2019 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRani et al. 2025 | leaves vegetable2017–2018 | not detected. | ||
52 findings · 20 studies · 6 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018 | autumn 20162016As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018 | summer 20162016As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012 | Borlova (reference area)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012 | Moldova Noua (mining area M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012 | Ruschita (mining area R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011 | Borlova reference area (Ref)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011 | Moldova Noua old mining area (M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011 | Ruschita old mining area (R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSee et al. 2025 | Pasar Borong Selangor wet market2022As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 2,100 µg/kg (minimum); 3,400 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026 | leafy vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group I2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 40 µg/kg (minimum); 70 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025 | plant part: leavesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025 | plant part: shootCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldFonge et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNisa et al. 2020 | local market2019 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOnakpa et al. 2022 | Gwagwalada Central Market, Abuja, July 20192019 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRani et al. 2025 | leaves vegetable2017–2018 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSamma et al. 2024 | six Bogura upazilas, compositesCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 5,010 µg/kg (minimum); 16,400 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSamma et al. 2024 | six Bogura upazilas, compositesCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSamma et al. 2024 | six Bogura upazilas, compositesCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | all three districts (mean of site means)2012 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | Bhaktapur district market sites (SBB)2012 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | Kathmandu district market sites (SKB)2012 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | Lalitpur district market sites (SLB)2012 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026 | Badulla (vegetable-paddy rotation, Ultisol)2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026 | Kalpitiya (vegetable-only cropping, coarse Entisol)2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026 | Nuwara Eliya (vegetable-only cropping, Ultisol)2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldJiang et al. 2020 | SZD village near a battery factory, Xinxiang, Henan2018Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 1 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 2 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 3 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
35 findings · 12 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012 | Borlova (reference area)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012 | Moldova Noua (mining area M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012 | Ruschita (mining area R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011 | Borlova reference area (Ref)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011 | Moldova Noua old mining area (M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011 | Ruschita old mining area (R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSee et al. 2025 | Pasar Borong Selangor wet market2022As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026 | leafy vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group I2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 3,230 µg/kg (minimum); 3,970 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025 | plant part: leavesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025 | plant part: shootCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldFonge et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNisa et al. 2020 | local market2019 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRani et al. 2025 | leaves vegetable2017–2018 | mean. | ||
34 findings · 11 studies · 4 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012 | Borlova (reference area)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012 | Moldova Noua (mining area M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012 | Ruschita (mining area R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011 | Borlova reference area (Ref)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011 | Moldova Noua old mining area (M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011 | Ruschita old mining area (R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 8,700 µg/kg (minimum); 21,900 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group I2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 100 µg/kg (minimum); 260 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldFonge et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldNisa et al. 2020 | local market2019 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOnakpa et al. 2022 | Gwagwalada Central Market, Abuja, July 20192019 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRani et al. 2025 | leaves vegetable2017–2018 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | max. | ||
54 findings · 17 studies · 4 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018 | autumn 20162016As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018 | summer 20162016As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | amateur farmers; washed with 5% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | amateur farmers; washed with 10% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | amateur farmers; washed with tap water2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with 5% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with 10% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012 | Borlova (reference area)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012 | Moldova Noua (mining area M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012 | Ruschita (mining area R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011 | Borlova reference area (Ref)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011 | Moldova Noua old mining area (M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011 | Ruschita old mining area (R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013As sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 59,500 µg/kg (minimum); 198,000 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026 | leafy vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group I2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 60 µg/kg (minimum); 160 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018 | Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025 | plant part: leavesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025 | plant part: shootCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldFonge et al. 2021 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldRani et al. 2025 | leaves vegetable2017–2018 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | all three districts (mean of site means)2012 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | Bhaktapur district market sites (SBB)2012 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | Kathmandu district market sites (SKB)2012 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014 | Lalitpur district market sites (SLB)2012 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026 | Badulla (vegetable-paddy rotation, Ultisol)2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026 | Kalpitiya (vegetable-only cropping, coarse Entisol)2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026 | Nuwara Eliya (vegetable-only cropping, Ultisol)2018–2020 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | min. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016 | Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013 | max. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldJiang et al. 2020 | SZD village near a battery factory, Xinxiang, Henan2018Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 1 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 2 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023 | unit 3 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | sample value. | ||
24 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group I2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
19 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
19 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | not detected. | ||
6 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | amateur farmers; washed with 5% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | amateur farmers; washed with 10% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | amateur farmers; washed with tap water2021As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with 5% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with 10% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022 | vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
20 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
4 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024 | dry season, control (Riyom)2019 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024 | dry season, mining-pit site2019 | not detected. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024 | rainy season, control (Riyom)2019 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024 | rainy season, mining-pit site2019 | not detected. | ||
20 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group I2021–2022 | mean. | ||
20 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group I2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Cecomaf2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
| Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025 | Lutendele2025 | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015 | food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not stated | sample value. | ||
Shared dataset methods and interpretation
Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.
HMI cabbage Pb reference · Cabbage, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Pb reference · Cabbage, as sold. Cabbage, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤4 | ≤4 | ≤4 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤4 | ≤4 | ≤4 |
135 reference units; 4 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 106 | 25% |
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 25% |
| See et al. 2025 | 1 | 25% |
| Spungen et al. 2024 | 1 | 25% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
4 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-2acccaf300da:f7a36af4127e
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Pb reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Pb reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤150 | 185–773 (bounded) | 773–7290 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤150 | 185–773 (bounded) | 773–7290 (bounded) |
26 reference units; 5 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 20% |
| Ametepey et al. 2018 | 1 | 20% |
| Kipelo et al. 2025 | 19 | 20% |
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 20% |
| Sultana et al. 2022 | 3 | 20% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
5 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-6797c3e3dd22:3169c928b49d
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Pb reference · Cabbage, as sold, basis not stated
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Pb reference · Cabbage, as sold, basis not stated. Cabbage, as sold; Basis not stated by the source, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 150 | 150 | 150 |
| Alternative weighting | 150 | 150 | 150 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a basis not stated by the source basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-23880e36fdc7:4eb0a2f28302
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Cd reference · Cabbage, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Cd reference · Cabbage, as sold. Cabbage, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤4 | 4.9–5.7 (bounded) | 6 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤4 | 4.9–5 (bounded) | 6 |
118 reference units; 4 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 89 | 25% |
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 25% |
| Dearing et al. 2025 | 1 | 25% |
| See et al. 2025 | 1 | 25% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
4 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-44bad05aec90:94f9babadc6d
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Cd reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Cd reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 109 | 170 | 220 |
| Alternative weighting | 109 | 170 | 220 |
28 reference units; 4 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 4 | 25% |
| Kipelo et al. 2025 | 19 | 25% |
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 25% |
| Sultana et al. 2022 | 4 | 25% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
4 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-266cf4ffb869:64e58744a4ba
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage tAs reference · Cabbage, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage tAs reference · Cabbage, as sold. Cabbage, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤3 | ≤3 | 1.85–5.69 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤3 | ≤3 | 1.85–5 (bounded) |
84 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 57 | 50% |
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-421e51a1fa20:52a3856e74d1
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage tAs reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage tAs reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 70 | 120 | 210 |
| Alternative weighting | 70 | 120 | 210 |
19 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Kipelo et al. 2025 | 19 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-d9950e3f3af9:4147ed182689
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage iAs reference · Cabbage, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage iAs reference · Cabbage, as sold. Cabbage, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤3 | ≤3 | ≤30 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤3 | ≤10 | 30–39 (bounded) |
9 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 9 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-8965bc80fdeb:5d5393d7493c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage iAs reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage iAs reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 39 | 39 | 39 |
| Alternative weighting | 39 | 39 | 39 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-033b43fe560c:691ff8cbb4ed
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage tHg reference · Cabbage, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage tHg reference · Cabbage, as sold. Cabbage, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.11 | ≤0.3 | 0.05–1 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.11 | ≤0.3 | 0.05–1 (bounded) |
62 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 33 | 33% |
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 33% |
| Dabeka et al. 2003 | 2 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-47ea1e369dc0:1ed1cf21a93a
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage tHg reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage tHg reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 13 | 27 | 44 |
| Alternative weighting | 13 | 27 | 44 |
19 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Kipelo et al. 2025 | 19 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-b2f799542db8:88dd889e64d9
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Ni reference · Cabbage, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Ni reference · Cabbage, as sold. Cabbage, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤35 | 35–37.5 (bounded) | 35–40 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤35 | 35–37.5 (bounded) | 35–40 (bounded) |
28 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 50% |
| Dearing et al. 2025 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-8354b8193529:d2402ef644d5
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Ni reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Ni reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 176–353 (bounded) | 353–355 (bounded) | 2700 |
| Alternative weighting | 176–353 (bounded) | 353–355 (bounded) | 2700 |
24 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Kipelo et al. 2025 | 19 | 33% |
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 33% |
| Sultana et al. 2022 | 4 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-0c525c2f0cb7:a89535b6bacf
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Cr reference · Cabbage, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Cr reference · Cabbage, as sold. Cabbage, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤5 | ≤10 | 5–50 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤5 | ≤10 | 5–50 (bounded) |
29 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 33% |
| Reczajska et al. 2005 | 1 | 33% |
| See et al. 2025 | 1 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-991e23dbac13:e3bf0c224ba8
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Cr reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Cr reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1120 | 1350 | 2200 |
| Alternative weighting | 1120 | 1350 | 2200 |
23 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Kipelo et al. 2025 | 19 | 50% |
| Sultana et al. 2022 | 4 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-214d0f635e61:25e0312ff277
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Sn reference · Cabbage, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Sn reference · Cabbage, as sold. Cabbage, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤10 | ≤10 | ≤10 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤10 | ≤10 | ≤10 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-73b94f880780:d46003360acf
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Sn reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Sn reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 780 | 920 | 1080 |
| Alternative weighting | 780 | 920 | 1080 |
19 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Kipelo et al. 2025 | 19 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-6f9602405ad3:c0b74757cb75
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Sb reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Sb reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 60 | 110 | 170 |
| Alternative weighting | 60 | 110 | 170 |
19 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Kipelo et al. 2025 | 19 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-7002fbfbafe1:f69325a039ed
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage U reference · Cabbage, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage U reference · Cabbage, as sold. Cabbage, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-8b8174502cf7:b5697411ed18
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Co reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Co reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 200 | 366 | 366 |
| Alternative weighting | 200 | 366 | 366 |
20 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Kipelo et al. 2025 | 19 | 50% |
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-9ed870258774:194822dc2f2b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Cu reference · Cabbage, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Cu reference · Cabbage, as sold. Cabbage, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤10 | ≤10 | ≤10 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤10 | ≤10 | ≤10 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| See et al. 2025 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
See et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-5eb00ad16d1a:b361074c09de
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Cu reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Cu reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 317 | 2830 | 23600 |
| Alternative weighting | 317 | 2830 | 23600 |
20 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Kipelo et al. 2025 | 19 | 50% |
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-89c866c5d72d:49b407876377
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Fe reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Fe reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 3890 | 136000 | 742000 |
| Alternative weighting | 3890 | 136000 | 742000 |
20 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Kipelo et al. 2025 | 19 | 50% |
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-649afa331999:eb056f7c7d14
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Mn reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Mn reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 799 | 33100 | 290000 |
| Alternative weighting | 799 | 33100 | 290000 |
20 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Kipelo et al. 2025 | 19 | 50% |
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-2ce3dc4ac0f3:cb65f14ccc7c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Zn reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Zn reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 74200 | 153000 | 289000 |
| Alternative weighting | 74200 | 153000 | 289000 |
19 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Kipelo et al. 2025 | 19 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-96dd16346fd8:d2812344fd3b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage V reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage V reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 630 | 1140 | 2280 |
| Alternative weighting | 630 | 1140 | 2280 |
19 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Kipelo et al. 2025 | 19 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-efc34e8c3d22:b2eeafdbedad
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Se reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Se reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 130 | 170 | 235 |
| Alternative weighting | 130 | 170 | 235 |
16 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Kipelo et al. 2025 | 16 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-c706f455ee9b:46c0b2d2d088
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Ag reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Ag reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 10 | 10 | 30 |
| Alternative weighting | 10 | 10 | 30 |
14 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Kipelo et al. 2025 | 14 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-479b07565159:acde503b6305
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Ba reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Ba reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 14700 | 30500 | 44300 |
| Alternative weighting | 14700 | 30500 | 44300 |
19 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Kipelo et al. 2025 | 19 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-21141b45bce3:3542ca444675
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Mo reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Mo reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 660 | 1050 | 2430 |
| Alternative weighting | 660 | 1050 | 2430 |
19 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Kipelo et al. 2025 | 19 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-aab68e6ef693:17abd536bda2
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI cabbage Ti reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI cabbage Ti reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 5050 | 11400 | 29000 |
| Alternative weighting | 5050 | 11400 | 29000 |
19 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Kipelo et al. 2025 | 19 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-5ac5432edb0f:a3d0bcde5f6f
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
The source reports only a percentile, range or maximum for these samples, with no mean or median to place against the reference. Spread figures that do have a mean or median are shown on that row instead.
The value could not be reconciled with its own paper, so it is shown but not compared.
The result is below a reporting limit, and the range from zero to that limit crosses more than one band.
No medians or sample values exist for this form and metal, so no HMI reference could be built.
The HMI reference for this form has fewer than four units or no measurable spread, below the display minimum.
The result is on a basis (dry weight, or not stated) that no HMI reference for this form uses, so it cannot be placed.
Reporting limits overlap the study comparison, so no direction can be shown.
No findings match these filters. Change the selection or reset to show all source findings.
How metals reach cabbage
The evidence on how metals reach cabbage comes from studies that compared exposed and ordinary settings. Cabbage, as sold from Ruschita (mining area R) (mining-affected area) had lead higher at 900 µg/kg, against 50 µg/kg for Borlova (reference area) in the same study.7Application of principal component analysis in the pollution assessment with heavy metals of vegetable food chain in the old mining areasChemistry Central Journal6:156Read source → In another study, cabbage, as sold from Ruschita old mining area (R) (mining-affected area) had lead higher at 900 µg/kg, against 50 µg/kg for Borlova reference area (Ref) in the same study.20Heavy metals health risk assessment for population via consumption of vegetables grown in old mining area; a case study: Banat County, RomaniaChemistry Central Journal 2011, 5:64Read source →
These are observational comparisons from single studies; the size of the difference depends on the site, metal and distance.
Which forms and regions measured lower
The HMI reference for lead in cabbage, as sold pools 26 subgroup units from 5 sampling families, with a median of between 185 and 773 µg/kg and a middle half spanning below 150 (lower quartile) and between 773 and 7,290 µg/kg (upper quartile).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →9Determination of heavy metals in selected vegetables from markets in Tamale Metropolis, GhanaInternational Journal of Food ContaminationRead source →14Heavy Metals in Commonly Consumed Root and Leafy Vegetables in Dhaka City, Bangladesh, and Assessment of Associated Public Health RisksEnvironmental Systems ResearchRead source →21Contamination level and dietary risk assessment of trace elements in Brassica pekinensis Lour. from gardening areas under tropical conditionsToxicology Reports 15 (2025) 102165Read source →22Detection of Heavy metals in Fruits and Vegetables available in the Market of Quetta cityAl-Nahrain Journal of Science 23(1):47-56Read source → For lead in cabbage, as sold, the reference median was below 4 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 4 to below 4 µg/kg across 135 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →23Heavy Metals Assessment in Selected Leafy Vegetables from Selangor, MalaysiaPertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural ScienceRead source →24Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source → For cadmium in cabbage, as sold, the reference median was between 4.9 and 5.7 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 4 to 6 µg/kg across 118 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →23Heavy Metals Assessment in Selected Leafy Vegetables from Selangor, MalaysiaPertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural ScienceRead source →25Assessment of Heavy Metals in Organic and Non-Organic Vegetables Post Severe Tropical Cyclone Gabrielle: A cross-sectional comparative analysisF1000ResearchRead source →
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, cabbage, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (2.3 µg/kg) and the highest in PAHO (185 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in EURO (3.88 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (195 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For total arsenic, the lowest regional median was in EURO (4.1 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (6.9 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Targeted cabbage, as sold samples in SEARO had lead equal to at 20 µg/kg, against 20 µg/kg for SEARO in the same study.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
In one study, lead across 19 groups of cabbage ranged from 1,220 µg/kg (Lutendele) to 30,900 µg/kg (Cecomaf); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.21Contamination level and dietary risk assessment of trace elements in Brassica pekinensis Lour. from gardening areas under tropical conditionsToxicology Reports 15 (2025) 102165Read source → In another study, cadmium across 8 groups of cabbage ranged from 3.88 µg/kg (EURO) to 74.5 µg/kg (WPRO); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Processing, cooking and preparation
No processing study for metals in this food is in the library yet.
Mitigation for cabbage
Lot testing against the applicable limit is the check that can be verified.
No measured way to lower metals in this food is in the library yet.
Trade-offs and limits of controls
Avoiding exposed growing areas lowered the metal measured in the studies available, but no study measured the cost or supply effect of doing so.7Application of principal component analysis in the pollution assessment with heavy metals of vegetable food chain in the old mining areasChemistry Central Journal6:156Read source → Metals do not move together, so a lot that passes a lead limit says little about cadmium, arsenic or nickel unless those are tested as well.
Testing cabbage for metals
Results depend on the method and its reporting limit. Reporting limits for lead ranged from 0.5 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 10,000 µg/kg (Sultana et al. 2022), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →14Heavy Metals in Commonly Consumed Root and Leafy Vegetables in Dhaka City, Bangladesh, and Assessment of Associated Public Health RisksEnvironmental Systems ResearchRead source → Reporting limits for cadmium ranged from 0.1 µg/kg (Al-Salimi et al. 2026) to 63 µg/kg (Kipelo et al. 2025), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.21Contamination level and dietary risk assessment of trace elements in Brassica pekinensis Lour. from gardening areas under tropical conditionsToxicology Reports 15 (2025) 102165Read source →26Lead and trace element contamination in market vegetables of Aden, Yemen: a human health risk assessmentDiscover Chemistry (2026) 3:83Read source → Reporting limits for total arsenic ranged from 0.2 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 600 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
A useful lot result names the form, the basis and a quantification limit well below the limit that applies.
Buying and verifying cabbage
No maximum level for metals in cabbage was verified from primary text for this page; buyers should confirm the limit that applies in the destination market.
Exposure from cabbage
No source in the library converted cabbage concentrations into a verified estimate of intake for a defined population. Concentrations describe the food, not individual risk.
Evidence review and remaining gaps
Every source record that names cabbage was decided on its content: 51 occurrence extracted, 51 records in all. The occurrence table renders every extracted result; held values remain visible with their reason.
References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.
Cabbage FAQs
What heavy metals are found in cabbage?
The library reports lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ag, As, Ba, Hg, Mo, Sr, Ti and Tl in cabbage, most often lead, cadmium and total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Heavy metal(oid)s concentration in Tehran supermarket vegetables: carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessmentToxin ReviewsRead source →4Assessment of the potential health risks associated with the aluminium, arsenic, cadmium and lead content in selected fruits and vegetables grown in JamaicaToxicology Reports 4 (2017) 181-187Read source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in cabbage, as sold from 3,881 results in 5 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 2.3 to 185 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
How do heavy metals get into cabbage?
In the studies available, cabbage from contaminated or exposed settings carried more metal than cabbage from the same study’s control.7Application of principal component analysis in the pollution assessment with heavy metals of vegetable food chain in the old mining areasChemistry Central Journal6:156Read source → Cabbage, as sold from Moldova Noua (mining area M) (mining-affected area) had lead higher at 250 µg/kg, against 50 µg/kg for Borlova (reference area) in the same study.7Application of principal component analysis in the pollution assessment with heavy metals of vegetable food chain in the old mining areasChemistry Central Journal6:156Read source →
Which regions report the lowest levels in cabbage?
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, cabbage, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (2.3 µg/kg) and the highest in PAHO (185 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in EURO (3.88 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (195 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
How much of the arsenic in cabbage is inorganic?
Inorganic arsenic, the more toxic form, was measured in 11 results from 3 sources, far fewer than total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →27Total Diet Study of metals and other elements in foodFood and Environment Research Agency report for the UK Food Standards Agency, Fera report 15/06, project FS102081Read source →28The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source → Centre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012 reported inorganic arsenic at 2 µg/kg (mean) in cabbage, as sold from all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites).28The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →
References
Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.
- GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsDataset
- FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsDataset
- Heavy metal(oid)s concentration in Tehran supermarket vegetables: carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessmentPeer-reviewed
- Assessment of the potential health risks associated with the aluminium, arsenic, cadmium and lead content in selected fruits and vegetables grown in JamaicaPeer-reviewed
- Probabilistic carcinogenic and health risk assessment of heavy metals in lettuce and cabbage from Behbahan, Iran, using Monte Carlo simulationPeer-reviewed
- Total and bioaccessible heavy metals in cabbagePeer-reviewed
- Application of principal component analysis in the pollution assessment with heavy metals of vegetable food chain in the old mining areasPeer-reviewed
- Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthPeer-reviewed
- Determination of heavy metals in selected vegetables from markets in Tamale Metropolis, GhanaPeer-reviewed
- Environmental surveillance of commonly-grown vegetables for investigating potential lead and chromium contamination intensification in BangladeshPeer-reviewed
- Detection of heavy metals concentration in vegetables andPeer-reviewed
- Analysis of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs and an Assessment of the Health Risks to the General Public via Consumption in Beijing, ChinaPeer-reviewed
- Analysis of Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals in Water, Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) and Tilapia Fish (Oreochromis niloticus) from Unreclaimed Mining PitsPeer-reviewed
- Heavy Metals in Commonly Consumed Root and Leafy Vegetables in Dhaka City, Bangladesh, and Assessment of Associated Public Health RisksPeer-reviewed
- Compound health risk assessment of cumulative heavy metal exposure: A case study of a village near a battery factory in Henan Province, ChinaPeer-reviewed
- Contamination and health risk assessment of lead, arsenic, cadmium, and aluminum from a total diet study of Jilin Province, ChinaPeer-reviewed
- Accumulation of potentially toxic trace elements in vegetables collected from selected vegetable-based cropping systems in Sri Lanka, and estimation of their dietary intakesPeer-reviewed
- Levels and potential health risk of heavy metals in marketed vegetables in Zhejiang, ChinaPeer-reviewed
- Determination of some heavy metals and their potential risk in selected vegetables on sale within Kaduna Metropolis, Kaduna State, NigeriaPeer-reviewed
- Heavy metals health risk assessment for population via consumption of vegetables grown in old mining area; a case study: Banat County, RomaniaPeer-reviewed
- Contamination level and dietary risk assessment of trace elements in Brassica pekinensis Lour. from gardening areas under tropical conditionsPeer-reviewed
- Detection of Heavy metals in Fruits and Vegetables available in the Market of Quetta cityPeer-reviewed
- Heavy Metals Assessment in Selected Leafy Vegetables from Selangor, MalaysiaPeer-reviewed
- Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Peer-reviewed
- Assessment of Heavy Metals in Organic and Non-Organic Vegetables Post Severe Tropical Cyclone Gabrielle: A cross-sectional comparative analysisPeer-reviewed
- Lead and trace element contamination in market vegetables of Aden, Yemen: a human health risk assessmentPeer-reviewed
- Total Diet Study of metals and other elements in foodGovernment
- The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicGovernment
Sources
Browse Cabbage Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.
Update history
22 October 2026: Rebuilt from every cabbage record in the library: 51 occurrence sources, references by form and basis, same-study contrasts.
