Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index
Cabbage, broccoli, Brussels sprouts and cauliflower illustrating cabbage ingredient context.

Heavy metals in Cabbage

Lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic and total mercury in cabbage: monitoring results, studies, references by form and basis, limits, testing and controls.

Quick read

Cabbage in the HMI library has 944 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ag, arsenic (As), Ba, mercury (Hg), Mo, Sr, Ti and Tl from 51 sources.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Alimohammadi M, Younesian M, Madihi-Bidgoli S, Nabizadeh Nodehi R, Jahed Khaniki GR, Hadi M, Ghanbari F · 2018Heavy metal(oid)s concentration in Tehran supermarket vegetables: carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessmentToxin ReviewsRead source →4Antoine JMR, Hoo Fung LA, Grant CN · 2017Assessment of the potential health risks associated with the aluminium, arsenic, cadmium and lead content in selected fruits and vegetables grown in JamaicaToxicology Reports 4 (2017) 181-187Read source →5Armand R, Rafati L, Mohammadi H, Armand N · 2026Probabilistic carcinogenic and health risk assessment of heavy metals in lettuce and cabbage from Behbahan, Iran, using Monte Carlo simulationScientific ReportsRead source →6Unknown authors · 2021Total and bioaccessible heavy metals in cabbagePeer-reviewed articleRead source →

Cabbage overview

Cabbage in the HMI library has 944 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ag, As, Ba, Hg, Mo, Sr, Ti and Tl from 51 sources.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Alimohammadi M, Younesian M, Madihi-Bidgoli S, Nabizadeh Nodehi R, Jahed Khaniki GR, Hadi M, Ghanbari F · 2018Heavy metal(oid)s concentration in Tehran supermarket vegetables: carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessmentToxin ReviewsRead source →4Antoine JMR, Hoo Fung LA, Grant CN · 2017Assessment of the potential health risks associated with the aluminium, arsenic, cadmium and lead content in selected fruits and vegetables grown in JamaicaToxicology Reports 4 (2017) 181-187Read source →5Armand R, Rafati L, Mohammadi H, Armand N · 2026Probabilistic carcinogenic and health risk assessment of heavy metals in lettuce and cabbage from Behbahan, Iran, using Monte Carlo simulationScientific ReportsRead source →6Unknown authors · 2021Total and bioaccessible heavy metals in cabbagePeer-reviewed articleRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in cabbage, as sold from 3,881 results in 5 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 2.3 to 185 µg/kg.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In the US Total Diet Study, cabbage, as sold had a median lead result below 4 µg/kg across 27 composites from 2017–2020.2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →

Across 10 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported lead means and medians on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis ranged from 3 µg/kg (Antoine et al. 2017) to 1,660 µg/kg (Guerra et al. 2012).4Antoine JMR, Hoo Fung LA, Grant CN · 2017Assessment of the potential health risks associated with the aluminium, arsenic, cadmium and lead content in selected fruits and vegetables grown in JamaicaToxicology Reports 4 (2017) 181-187Read source →8Guerra F, Trevizam AR, Muraoka T, Marcante NC, Canniatti-Brazaca SG · 2012Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source → For cadmium, 11 studies on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis reported means and medians from 3 µg/kg (Alimohammadi et al. 2018) to 350 µg/kg (authors 2021).3Alimohammadi M, Younesian M, Madihi-Bidgoli S, Nabizadeh Nodehi R, Jahed Khaniki GR, Hadi M, Ghanbari F · 2018Heavy metal(oid)s concentration in Tehran supermarket vegetables: carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessmentToxin ReviewsRead source →6Unknown authors · 2021Total and bioaccessible heavy metals in cabbagePeer-reviewed articleRead source → Higher results came from contaminated or exposed settings rather than ordinary supply. Cabbage, as sold from Ruschita (mining area R) (mining-affected area) had lead higher at 900 µg/kg, against 50 µg/kg for Borlova (reference area) in the same study.7Iosif Gergen, Monica Harmanescu · 2012Application of principal component analysis in the pollution assessment with heavy metals of vegetable food chain in the old mining areasChemistry Central Journal6:156Read source →

For a buyer the practical points are the form bought, the basis a result is reported on, where the cabbage came from and the laboratory’s reporting limit. Testing finds contamination but does not remove it.

What counts as cabbage

This page covers cabbage, as sold (944 results).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Alimohammadi M, Younesian M, Madihi-Bidgoli S, Nabizadeh Nodehi R, Jahed Khaniki GR, Hadi M, Ghanbari F · 2018Heavy metal(oid)s concentration in Tehran supermarket vegetables: carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessmentToxin ReviewsRead source →4Antoine JMR, Hoo Fung LA, Grant CN · 2017Assessment of the potential health risks associated with the aluminium, arsenic, cadmium and lead content in selected fruits and vegetables grown in JamaicaToxicology Reports 4 (2017) 181-187Read source →5Armand R, Rafati L, Mohammadi H, Armand N · 2026Probabilistic carcinogenic and health risk assessment of heavy metals in lettuce and cabbage from Behbahan, Iran, using Monte Carlo simulationScientific ReportsRead source →6Unknown authors · 2021Total and bioaccessible heavy metals in cabbagePeer-reviewed articleRead source →

Results stay on the basis each source reports: as sold or fresh weight, dry weight, or unstated. Dry-weight, as-sold and unstated results are never pooled, and no moisture conversion is applied.

Heavy metal contamination profile of cabbage

The table holds every extracted cabbage result: one row for each statistic a source reports for a form, group and metal, 944 rows in all, grouped by metal and form; percentiles, ranges and maxima for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Alimohammadi M, Younesian M, Madihi-Bidgoli S, Nabizadeh Nodehi R, Jahed Khaniki GR, Hadi M, Ghanbari F · 2018Heavy metal(oid)s concentration in Tehran supermarket vegetables: carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessmentToxin ReviewsRead source →4Antoine JMR, Hoo Fung LA, Grant CN · 2017Assessment of the potential health risks associated with the aluminium, arsenic, cadmium and lead content in selected fruits and vegetables grown in JamaicaToxicology Reports 4 (2017) 181-187Read source →5Armand R, Rafati L, Mohammadi H, Armand N · 2026Probabilistic carcinogenic and health risk assessment of heavy metals in lettuce and cabbage from Behbahan, Iran, using Monte Carlo simulationScientific ReportsRead source →6Unknown authors · 2021Total and bioaccessible heavy metals in cabbagePeer-reviewed articleRead source → Monitoring medians are HMI calculations from individual submissions; non-detects remain intervals between zero and the reporting limit and are never read as zero.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

494 rows can be rated against an HMI reference for the same form and basis, 44 rows have a direct same-study comparison, and the rest stay unrated with the reason recorded. 39 values from 13 sources failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.5Armand R, Rafati L, Mohammadi H, Armand N · 2026Probabilistic carcinogenic and health risk assessment of heavy metals in lettuce and cabbage from Behbahan, Iran, using Monte Carlo simulationScientific ReportsRead source →7Iosif Gergen, Monica Harmanescu · 2012Application of principal component analysis in the pollution assessment with heavy metals of vegetable food chain in the old mining areasChemistry Central Journal6:156Read source →9Ametepey ST, Cobbina SJ, Akpabey FJ, Duwiejua AB, Atule AA · 2018Determination of heavy metals in selected vegetables from markets in Tamale Metropolis, GhanaInternational Journal of Food ContaminationRead source →10Hossain AMMM, Islam MS, Mamun MM, Al-Jonaed HM, Imran M, Rahman MH, Kazi MAI, Elahi SF · 2016Environmental surveillance of commonly-grown vegetables for investigating potential lead and chromium contamination intensification in BangladeshSpringerPlusRead source →11Unknown authors · 2025Detection of heavy metals concentration in vegetables andPeer-reviewed articleRead source →12Liang G, Gong W, Li B, Zuo J, Pan L, Liu X · 2019Analysis of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs and an Assessment of the Health Risks to the General Public via Consumption in Beijing, ChinaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthRead source →13Okonofua ES, Komolafe AS, Emeribe CN, Ogbomida ET, Butu AW · 2024Analysis of Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals in Water, Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) and Tilapia Fish (Oreochromis niloticus) from Unreclaimed Mining PitsEarth Sciences PakistanRead source →14Sultana R, Tanvir RU, Hussain KA, Chamon AS, Mondol MN · 2022Heavy Metals in Commonly Consumed Root and Leafy Vegetables in Dhaka City, Bangladesh, and Assessment of Associated Public Health RisksEnvironmental Systems ResearchRead source →15Jiang Y, Ma J, Ruan X · 2020Compound health risk assessment of cumulative heavy metal exposure: A case study of a village near a battery factory in Henan Province, ChinaEnvironmental Science: Processes & ImpactsRead source →16Wang B, Liu Y, Wang H, Cui L, Zhang Z, Guo J, Liu S, Cui W · 2020Contamination and health risk assessment of lead, arsenic, cadmium, and aluminum from a total diet study of Jilin Province, ChinaFood Science & NutritionRead source →17Silva NRN, Attanayake CP, Vitharana WAU, Weerasinghe P · 2025Accumulation of potentially toxic trace elements in vegetables collected from selected vegetable-based cropping systems in Sri Lanka, and estimation of their dietary intakesJournal of Dry Zone Agriculture 2025, 11(1):1-16Read source →18Pan X-D, Wu P-G, Jiang X-G · 2016Levels and potential health risk of heavy metals in marketed vegetables in Zhejiang, ChinaScientific ReportsRead source →19Imongben CO, Tomori WB, Umoru PE, Oyerinde WA · 2026Determination of some heavy metals and their potential risk in selected vegetables on sale within Kaduna Metropolis, Kaduna State, NigeriaWorld NutritionRead source →

Comparison methods and scope

Each row is one statistic a source reports for one form of cabbage, group and metal; percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Different forms and preparation states are kept apart, and dry-weight results never share a reference with as-sold or fresh-weight results. Ratings place a result against an HMI reference built from monitoring results and ordinary-setting medians for the same form and basis. Same-study contrasts compare a contaminated or treated site with its control, targeted with random sampling, a prepared form with the unprocessed one, or one group of a study with the median of its other groups. Held rows failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.

About this table
Food formCollection scopeFindingComparisonEvidence
Cabbage findings from monitoring programmes, total diet studies and every extracted field, market and contaminated-site study, in µg/kg with each source’s form, basis, statistic and censoring retained.
Food formCollection scopeFinding (µg/kg)ComparisonEvidence
135 findings · 45 studies · 9 spread figures folded in
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodAFRO2018As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2019As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2009–2019As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO1999As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2019As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2018As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2014–2015As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2003–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2000–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2014–2016As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2014–2016As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2011As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2012–2014As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2012As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2008As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2003–2013As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2008As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2003–2013As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldFDA Total Diet Study6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018autumn 20162016As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018summer 20162016As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldAntoine et al. 2017Jamaican-grown, markets and farms island-wide, all samplesCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldArmand et al. 202610 retail vegetable storesCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshrange.
Cabbage, as soldArmand et al. 2026Behbahan retail vegetable stores (10 stores x 2 rounds)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2021all four cities (12 market composites)2018As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2021Wuding2018As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022amateur farmers; washed with 5% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / freshnot detected.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022amateur farmers; washed with 10% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / freshnot detected.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022amateur farmers; washed with tap water2021As sold / freshnot detected.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022vegetable and fruit market; washed with 5% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / freshnot detected.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022vegetable and fruit market; washed with 10% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / freshnot detected.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012Borlova (reference area)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012Moldova Noua (mining area M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012Ruschita (mining area R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market, Sao Paulo, August 2009; origin unknown2009As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011Borlova reference area (Ref)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011Moldova Noua old mining area (M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011Ruschita old mining area (R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015NE Britain (Aberdeenshire) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015NE Britain (Aberdeenshire) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.Same samples: 14.7 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015NE Britain (Aberdeenshire) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmin.
Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.Same samples: 298 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmin.
Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023CON (conventional crop protection)2004–2012As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023FYM cattle manure fertilizer2004–2012As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023NPK mineral fertilizer2004–2012As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023ORG (organic crop protection)2004–2012As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023spring beans pre-crop2004–2012As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023winter barley pre-crop2004–2012As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldSee et al. 2025Pasar Borong Selangor wet market2022As sold / freshnot detected.
Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2025all three growing areas pooled2018–2020As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldSpungen et al. 2024all samples2018–2020As sold / freshnot detected.
Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013As sold / freshmean.Same samples: 400 µg/kg (minimum); 1,530 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldX-D et al. 2016species mean, Zhejiang Province, China2014As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2016–2017median.
Cabbage, as soldAl 2010Vegetables, Riyadh city markets, May 20092009mean.
Cabbage, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026leafy vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group I2021–2022mean.
Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreportednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreportednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldAMMM et al. 2016all samples (64 districts)Collection date unreportedmedian.Same samples: 2 µg/kg (minimum); 29,800 µg/kg (maximum); 12,700 µg/kg (percentile)
Cabbage, as soldAMMM et al. 2016Nationwide district samples, BangladeshCollection date unreportednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025Akaki River-irrigated farmland (Addis Ababa)Collection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025plant part: leavesCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025plant part: shootCollection date unreportednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldFonge et al. 2021all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldJitender et al. 2017wastewater-irrigated farmland, Hisar, three locations pooledCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldLiang et al. 2019Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldNisa et al. 2020local market2019sample value.
Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024dry season, control (Riyom)2019mean.
Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024dry season, mining-pit site2019mean.
Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024rainy season, control (Riyom)2019not detected.
Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024rainy season, mining-pit site2019mean.
Cabbage, as soldOnakpa et al. 2022Gwagwalada Central Market, Abuja, July 20192019not detected.
Cabbage, as soldOrosun et al. 2023Ilorin farms, all sites2021mean.
Cabbage, as soldRani et al. 2025leaves vegetable2017–2018mean.
Cabbage, as soldSamma et al. 2024six Bogura upazilas, compositesCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 6,930 µg/kg (minimum); 23,300 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014all three districts (mean of site means)2012mean.
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014Bhaktapur district market sites (SBB)2012mean.
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014Kathmandu district market sites (SKB)2012mean.
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014Lalitpur district market sites (SLB)2012mean.
Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026Badulla (vegetable-paddy rotation, Ultisol)2018–2020mean.
Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026Kalpitiya (vegetable-only cropping, coarse Entisol)2018–2020mean.
Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026Nuwara Eliya (vegetable-only cropping, Ultisol)2018–2020mean.
Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013mean.
Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 20221st phase (early)Collection date unreportednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 20222nd phase (mid)Collection date unreportednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 20223rd phase (mid)Collection date unreportedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 20224th phase (late)Collection date unreportednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022all four phasesCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2012Basis not statedmedian.
Cabbage, as soldAbbas et al. 2010fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldJiang et al. 2020SZD village near a battery factory, Xinxiang, Henan2018Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldMawari et al. 2022Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldTalib 2018Iran-labelled origin, Najaf market2017Basis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldTalib 2018Iran-labelled origin, Najaf market2017Basis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldTalib 2018Iraq-labelled origin, Najaf market2017Basis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 1 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 2 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 3 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
128 findings · 43 studies · 10 spread figures folded in
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodAFRO2018As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2006As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2006As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2019As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2009–2019As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO1999–2006As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2019As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2018As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2006As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2003–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO1999–2018As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2000–2010As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2008As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2002–2011As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldFDA Total Diet Study6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018autumn 20162016As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018summer 20162016As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldAntoine et al. 2017Jamaican-grown, markets and farms island-wide, all samplesCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldArmand et al. 202610 retail vegetable storesCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshrange.
Cabbage, as soldArmand et al. 2026Behbahan retail vegetable stores (10 stores x 2 rounds)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2021all four cities (12 market composites)2018As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2021Wuding2018As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022amateur farmers; washed with 5% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / freshnot detected.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022amateur farmers; washed with 10% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / freshnot detected.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022amateur farmers; washed with tap water2021As sold / freshnot detected.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022vegetable and fruit market; washed with 5% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / freshnot detected.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022vegetable and fruit market; washed with 10% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / freshnot detected.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldDearing et al. 2025genus Brassica2024As sold / freshmedian.Same samples: 93 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012Borlova (reference area)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012Moldova Noua (mining area M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012Ruschita (mining area R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market, Sao Paulo, August 2009; origin unknown2009As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011Borlova reference area (Ref)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011Moldova Noua old mining area (M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011Ruschita old mining area (R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015NE Britain (Aberdeenshire) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015NE Britain (Aberdeenshire) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.Same samples: 10 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015NE Britain (Aberdeenshire) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmin.
Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.Same samples: 21.2 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldNorton et al. 2015SW Britain (Devon and Cornwall) basket surveyCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmin.
Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023CON (conventional crop protection)2004–2012As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023FYM cattle manure fertilizer2004–2012As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023NPK mineral fertilizer2004–2012As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023ORG (organic crop protection)2004–2012As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023spring beans pre-crop2004–2012As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023winter barley pre-crop2004–2012As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldSee et al. 2025Pasar Borong Selangor wet market2022As sold / freshnot detected.
Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2025all three growing areas pooled2018–2020As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldSpungen et al. 2024all samples2018–2020As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013As sold / freshmean.Same samples: 100 µg/kg (minimum); 240 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldX-D et al. 2016species mean, Zhejiang Province, China2014As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldX-D et al. 2016species mean, Zhejiang Province, China2014As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2016–2019median.
Cabbage, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026leafy vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group I2021–2022mean.
Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 40 µg/kg (minimum); 70 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018Central and Aboabo Markets, TamaleCollection date unreportedrange.
Cabbage, as soldAMMM et al. 2016all samples (64 districts)Collection date unreportedmedian.Same samples: 98 µg/kg (minimum); 1,110 µg/kg (maximum); 640 µg/kg (percentile)
Cabbage, as soldAMMM et al. 2016Nationwide district samples, BangladeshCollection date unreportednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025Akaki River-irrigated farmland (Addis Ababa)Collection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldFonge et al. 2021all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldLiang et al. 2019Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldNisa et al. 2020local market2019sample value.
Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024dry season, control (Riyom)2019mean.
Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024dry season, mining-pit site2019mean.
Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024rainy season, control (Riyom)2019mean.
Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024rainy season, mining-pit site2019mean.
Cabbage, as soldOnakpa et al. 2022Gwagwalada Central Market, Abuja, July 20192019mean.
Cabbage, as soldOrosun et al. 2023Ilorin farms, all sites2021mean.
Cabbage, as soldRani et al. 2025leaves vegetable2017–2018mean.
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014all three districts (mean of site means)2012mean.
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014Bhaktapur district market sites (SBB)2012mean.
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014Kathmandu district market sites (SKB)2012mean.
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014Lalitpur district market sites (SLB)2012mean.
Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026Badulla (vegetable-paddy rotation, Ultisol)2018–2020mean.
Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026Kalpitiya (vegetable-only cropping, coarse Entisol)2018–2020mean.
Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026Nuwara Eliya (vegetable-only cropping, Ultisol)2018–2020mean.
Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013mean.
Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 20221st phase (early)Collection date unreportednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 20222nd phase (mid)Collection date unreportedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 20223rd phase (mid)Collection date unreportednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 20224th phase (late)Collection date unreportednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022all four phasesCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldAbbas et al. 2010fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldCantoral et al. 2024all samples (single foodstuff, duplicate mean)2022–2023Basis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldJiang et al. 2020SZD village near a battery factory, Xinxiang, Henan2018Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldMawari et al. 2022Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldTalib 2018Iran-labelled origin, Najaf market2017Basis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldTalib 2018Iran-labelled origin, Najaf market2017Basis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldTalib 2018Iraq-labelled origin, Najaf market2017Basis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 1 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 2 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 3 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
65 findings · 22 studies
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodAFRO2018As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2023As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2008–2015As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2012–2023As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2002–2003As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2002–2022As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2007–2015As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2008As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2014–2023As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2022As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2017–2023As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2022As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2004–2009As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2008As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldFDA Total Diet Study6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018autumn 20162016As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018summer 20162016As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldAntoine et al. 2017Jamaican-grown, markets and farms island-wide, all samplesCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2021all four cities (12 market composites)2018As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2021four cities, range of city means2018As sold / freshrange.
Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2025all three growing areas pooled2018–2020As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2025all three growing areas pooled2018–2020As sold / freshmin.
Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2025all three growing areas pooled2018–2020As sold / freshmax.
Cabbage, as soldX-D et al. 2016species mean, Zhejiang Province, China2014As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group I2021–2022mean.
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025Akaki River-irrigated farmland (Addis Ababa)Collection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldFonge et al. 2021all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldLiang et al. 2019Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldOrosun et al. 2023Ilorin farms, all sites2021mean.
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014Bhaktapur district market sites (SBB)2012not detected.
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014Kathmandu district market sites (SKB)2012not detected.
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014Lalitpur district market sites (SLB)2012not detected.
Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026Badulla (vegetable-paddy rotation, Ultisol)2018–2020mean.
Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026Kalpitiya (vegetable-only cropping, coarse Entisol)2018–2020mean.
Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026Nuwara Eliya (vegetable-only cropping, Ultisol)2018–2020mean.
Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013not detected.
Cabbage, as soldAbbas et al. 2010fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not statednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldJiang et al. 2020SZD village near a battery factory, Xinxiang, Henan2018Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldMawari et al. 2022Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 1 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 2 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 3 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
11 findings · 3 studies
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2007–2016As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2019As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2020As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2010median.
Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not statednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
40 findings · 13 studies · 2 spread figures folded in
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodAFRO2018As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2004–2020As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2011As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2020As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2004As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2008As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldFDA Total Diet Study6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldDabeka et al. 2003Ottawa composite (retail Oct-Nov 2000)1998–2000As sold / freshsample value.
Cabbage, as soldDabeka et al. 2003Whitehorse composite (retail Jan-Feb 1998)1998–2000As sold / freshnot detected.
Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013As sold / freshmean.Same samples: 6.5 µg/kg (minimum); 11.5 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldX-D et al. 2016species mean, Zhejiang Province, China2014As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025Akaki River-irrigated farmland (Addis Ababa)Collection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldLiang et al. 2019Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014Bhaktapur district market sites (SBB)2012not detected.
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014Kathmandu district market sites (SKB)2012not detected.
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014Lalitpur district market sites (SLB)2012not detected.
Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013mean.
Cabbage, as soldAbbas et al. 2010fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not statednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldJiang et al. 2020SZD village near a battery factory, Xinxiang, Henan2018Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldMawari et al. 2022Chandrahal farm, Solapur2017Basis not statedmean.
63 findings · 21 studies · 3 spread figures folded in
Cabbage, as soldFDA Total Diet Study6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018autumn 20162016As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018summer 20162016As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldArmand et al. 202610 retail vegetable storesCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshrange.
Cabbage, as soldArmand et al. 2026Behbahan retail vegetable stores (10 stores x 2 rounds)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldDearing et al. 2025genus Brassica2024As sold / freshmedian.Same samples: 270 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012Borlova (reference area)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012Moldova Noua (mining area M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012Ruschita (mining area R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market, Sao Paulo, August 2009; origin unknown2009As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011Borlova reference area (Ref)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011Moldova Noua old mining area (M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011Ruschita old mining area (R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023CON (conventional crop protection)2004–2012As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023FYM cattle manure fertilizer2004–2012As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023NPK mineral fertilizer2004–2012As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023ORG (organic crop protection)2004–2012As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023spring beans pre-crop2004–2012As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldRempelos et al. 2023winter barley pre-crop2004–2012As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013As sold / freshmean.Same samples: 1,110 µg/kg (minimum); 2,950 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group I2021–2022mean.
Cabbage, as soldFonge et al. 2021all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldNisa et al. 2020local market2019sample value.
Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024dry season, control (Riyom)2019mean.
Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024dry season, mining-pit site2019mean.
Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024rainy season, control (Riyom)2019mean.
Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024rainy season, mining-pit site2019mean.
Cabbage, as soldOnakpa et al. 2022Gwagwalada Central Market, Abuja, July 20192019not detected.
Cabbage, as soldRani et al. 2025leaves vegetable2017–2018mean.
Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013mean.
Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 20221st phase (early)Collection date unreportednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 20222nd phase (mid)Collection date unreportednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 20223rd phase (mid)Collection date unreportedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 20224th phase (late)Collection date unreportednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022all four phasesCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldJiang et al. 2020SZD village near a battery factory, Xinxiang, Henan2018Basis not statedmean.
57 findings · 24 studies · 6 spread figures folded in
Cabbage, as soldFDA Total Diet Study6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018autumn 20162016As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018summer 20162016As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldArmand et al. 202610 retail vegetable storesCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshrange.
Cabbage, as soldArmand et al. 2026Behbahan retail vegetable stores (10 stores x 2 rounds)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2021all four cities (12 market composites)2018As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2021four cities, range2018As sold / freshrange.
Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market, Sao Paulo, August 2009; origin unknown2009As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldReczajska et al. 2005all samples (three Polish agricultural areas)2001As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldReczajska et al. 2005all samples (three Polish agricultural areas)2001As sold / freshmean.Same samples: up to 15 µg/kg (range; lowest below the limit); 10 µg/kg (percentile)
Cabbage, as soldSee et al. 2025Pasar Borong Selangor wet market2022As sold / freshnot detected.
Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group I2021–2022mean.
Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 30 µg/kg (minimum); 470 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018Central and Aboabo Markets, TamaleCollection date unreportedrange.
Cabbage, as soldAMMM et al. 2016all samples (64 districts)Collection date unreportedmedian.Same samples: 2,140 µg/kg (percentile)
Cabbage, as soldAMMM et al. 2016Nationwide district samples, BangladeshCollection date unreportednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldAMMM et al. 2016Nationwide district samples, BangladeshCollection date unreportedmax.
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025Akaki River-irrigated farmland (Addis Ababa)Collection date unreportednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025plant part: leavesCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025plant part: shootCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldFonge et al. 2021all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldLiang et al. 2019Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldOnakpa et al. 2022Gwagwalada Central Market, Abuja, July 20192019mean.
Cabbage, as soldOrosun et al. 2023Ilorin farms, all sites2021mean.
Cabbage, as soldRani et al. 2025leaves vegetable2017–2018mean.
Cabbage, as soldSamma et al. 2024six Bogura upazilas, compositesCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 3,100 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldSamma et al. 2024six Bogura upazilas, compositesCollection date unreportednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013not detected.
Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 20221st phase (early)Collection date unreportedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 20222nd phase (mid)Collection date unreportednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 20223rd phase (mid)Collection date unreportedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 20224th phase (late)Collection date unreportedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldSultana et al. 2022all four phasesCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not statednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldJiang et al. 2020SZD village near a battery factory, Xinxiang, Henan2018Basis not statedmean.
12 findings · 7 studies
Cabbage, as soldAntoine et al. 2017Jamaican-grown, markets and farms island-wide, all samplesCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldSee et al. 2025Pasar Borong Selangor wet market2022As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group I2021–2022mean.
Cabbage, as soldRani et al. 2025leaves vegetable2017–2018mean.
Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
26 findings · 4 studies
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011As sold / freshmedian.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not statednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
24 findings · 3 studies
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
1 finding · 1 study
Cabbage, as soldFDA Total Diet Study6 collection regions2017–2020As sold / freshmedian.
27 findings · 7 studies
Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market, Sao Paulo, August 2009; origin unknown2009As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group I2021–2022mean.
Cabbage, as soldFonge et al. 2021all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldNisa et al. 2020local market2019sample value.
Cabbage, as soldRani et al. 2025leaves vegetable2017–2018not detected.
52 findings · 20 studies · 6 spread figures folded in
Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018autumn 20162016As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018summer 20162016As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012Borlova (reference area)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012Moldova Noua (mining area M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012Ruschita (mining area R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011Borlova reference area (Ref)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011Moldova Noua old mining area (M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011Ruschita old mining area (R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldSee et al. 2025Pasar Borong Selangor wet market2022As sold / freshnot detected.
Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013As sold / freshmean.Same samples: 2,100 µg/kg (minimum); 3,400 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026leafy vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group I2021–2022mean.
Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 40 µg/kg (minimum); 70 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025plant part: leavesCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025plant part: shootCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldFonge et al. 2021all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldNisa et al. 2020local market2019sample value.
Cabbage, as soldOnakpa et al. 2022Gwagwalada Central Market, Abuja, July 20192019mean.
Cabbage, as soldRani et al. 2025leaves vegetable2017–2018mean.
Cabbage, as soldSamma et al. 2024six Bogura upazilas, compositesCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 5,010 µg/kg (minimum); 16,400 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014all three districts (mean of site means)2012mean.
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014Bhaktapur district market sites (SBB)2012mean.
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014Kathmandu district market sites (SKB)2012mean.
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014Lalitpur district market sites (SLB)2012mean.
Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026Badulla (vegetable-paddy rotation, Ultisol)2018–2020mean.
Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026Kalpitiya (vegetable-only cropping, coarse Entisol)2018–2020mean.
Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026Nuwara Eliya (vegetable-only cropping, Ultisol)2018–2020mean.
Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013mean.
Cabbage, as soldJiang et al. 2020SZD village near a battery factory, Xinxiang, Henan2018Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 1 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 2 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 3 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
35 findings · 12 studies · 2 spread figures folded in
Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012Borlova (reference area)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012Moldova Noua (mining area M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012Ruschita (mining area R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011Borlova reference area (Ref)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011Moldova Noua old mining area (M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011Ruschita old mining area (R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldSee et al. 2025Pasar Borong Selangor wet market2022As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026leafy vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group I2021–2022mean.
Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 3,230 µg/kg (minimum); 3,970 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025plant part: leavesCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025plant part: shootCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldFonge et al. 2021all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldNisa et al. 2020local market2019sample value.
Cabbage, as soldRani et al. 2025leaves vegetable2017–2018mean.
34 findings · 11 studies · 4 spread figures folded in
Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012Borlova (reference area)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012Moldova Noua (mining area M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012Ruschita (mining area R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011Borlova reference area (Ref)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011Moldova Noua old mining area (M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011Ruschita old mining area (R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013As sold / freshmean.Same samples: 8,700 µg/kg (minimum); 21,900 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group I2021–2022mean.
Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 100 µg/kg (minimum); 260 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldFonge et al. 2021all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldNisa et al. 2020local market2019sample value.
Cabbage, as soldOnakpa et al. 2022Gwagwalada Central Market, Abuja, July 20192019mean.
Cabbage, as soldRani et al. 2025leaves vegetable2017–2018mean.
Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013mean.
54 findings · 17 studies · 4 spread figures folded in
Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018autumn 20162016As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldAlimohammadi et al. 2018summer 20162016As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022amateur farmers; washed with 5% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022amateur farmers; washed with 10% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022amateur farmers; washed with tap water2021As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022vegetable and fruit market; washed with 5% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022vegetable and fruit market; washed with 10% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021As sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012Borlova (reference area)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012Moldova Noua (mining area M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldGergen et al. 2012Ruschita (mining area R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011Borlova reference area (Ref)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011Moldova Noua old mining area (M)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldHarmanescu et al. 2011Ruschita old mining area (R)Collection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013As sold / freshmean.Same samples: 59,500 µg/kg (minimum); 198,000 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026leafy vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group I2021–2022mean.
Cabbage, as soldAmetepey et al. 2018Central and Aboabo markets, TamaleCollection date unreportedmean.Same samples: 60 µg/kg (minimum); 160 µg/kg (maximum)
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025plant part: leavesCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldauthors 2025plant part: shootCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldFonge et al. 2021all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldRani et al. 2025leaves vegetable2017–2018mean.
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014all three districts (mean of site means)2012mean.
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014Bhaktapur district market sites (SBB)2012mean.
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014Kathmandu district market sites (SKB)2012mean.
Cabbage, as soldShakya et al. 2014Lalitpur district market sites (SLB)2012mean.
Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026Badulla (vegetable-paddy rotation, Ultisol)2018–2020mean.
Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026Kalpitiya (vegetable-only cropping, coarse Entisol)2018–2020mean.
Cabbage, as soldSilva et al. 2026Nuwara Eliya (vegetable-only cropping, Ultisol)2018–2020mean.
Cabbage, as soldStančić et al. 2016Varaždin city market, 11 sales locations2013mean.
Cabbage, as soldJiang et al. 2020SZD village near a battery factory, Xinxiang, Henan2018Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 1 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 2 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
Cabbage, as soldTodorovska 2023unit 3 (leafy vegetable)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedsample value.
24 findings · 3 studies
Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group I2021–2022mean.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Cabbage, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
19 findings · 1 study
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025not detected.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025not detected.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025not detected.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
19 findings · 1 study
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025not detected.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025not detected.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025not detected.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025not detected.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025not detected.
6 findings · 1 study
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022amateur farmers; washed with 5% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / freshnot detected.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022amateur farmers; washed with 10% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / freshnot detected.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022amateur farmers; washed with tap water2021As sold / freshnot detected.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022vegetable and fruit market; washed with 5% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / freshnot detected.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022vegetable and fruit market; washed with 10% acetic acid vinegar2021As sold / freshnot detected.
Cabbage, as soldBora et al. 2022vegetable and fruit market; washed with tap water2021As sold / freshmean.
20 findings · 2 studies
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not statedsample value.
4 findings · 1 study
Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024dry season, control (Riyom)2019mean.
Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024dry season, mining-pit site2019not detected.
Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024rainy season, control (Riyom)2019mean.
Cabbage, as soldOkonofua et al. 2024rainy season, mining-pit site2019not detected.
20 findings · 2 studies
Cabbage, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedmean.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
1 finding · 1 study
Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group I2021–2022mean.
20 findings · 2 studies
Cabbage, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group I2021–2022mean.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Cecomaf2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
Cabbage, as soldKipelo et al. 2025Lutendele2025sample value.
1 finding · 1 study
Cabbage, as soldBaxter et al. 2015food category composite 11_622014–2015Basis not statedsample value.
Shared dataset methods and interpretation

Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.

HMI cabbage Pb reference · Cabbage, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Pb reference · Cabbage, as sold. Cabbage, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤4≤4≤4
Alternative weighting≤4≤4≤4

135 reference units; 4 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food10625%
FDA Total Diet Study2725%
See et al. 2025125%
Spungen et al. 2024125%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

4 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-2acccaf300da:f7a36af4127e

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Pb reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Pb reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤150185–773 (bounded)773–7290 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤150185–773 (bounded)773–7290 (bounded)

26 reference units; 5 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food220%
Ametepey et al. 2018120%
Kipelo et al. 20251920%
Nisa et al. 2020120%
Sultana et al. 2022320%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

5 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-6797c3e3dd22:3169c928b49d

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Pb reference · Cabbage, as sold, basis not stated

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Pb reference · Cabbage, as sold, basis not stated. Cabbage, as sold; Basis not stated by the source, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference150150150
Alternative weighting150150150

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food1100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a basis not stated by the source basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-23880e36fdc7:4eb0a2f28302

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Cd reference · Cabbage, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Cd reference · Cabbage, as sold. Cabbage, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤44.9–5.7 (bounded)6
Alternative weighting≤44.9–5 (bounded)6

118 reference units; 4 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food8925%
FDA Total Diet Study2725%
Dearing et al. 2025125%
See et al. 2025125%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

4 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-44bad05aec90:94f9babadc6d

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Cd reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Cd reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference109170220
Alternative weighting109170220

28 reference units; 4 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food425%
Kipelo et al. 20251925%
Nisa et al. 2020125%
Sultana et al. 2022425%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

4 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-266cf4ffb869:64e58744a4ba

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage tAs reference · Cabbage, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage tAs reference · Cabbage, as sold. Cabbage, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤3≤31.85–5.69 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤3≤31.85–5 (bounded)

84 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food5750%
FDA Total Diet Study2750%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-421e51a1fa20:52a3856e74d1

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage tAs reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage tAs reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference70120210
Alternative weighting70120210

19 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Kipelo et al. 202519100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-d9950e3f3af9:4147ed182689

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage iAs reference · Cabbage, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage iAs reference · Cabbage, as sold. Cabbage, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤3≤3≤30
Alternative weighting≤3≤1030–39 (bounded)

9 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food9100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-8965bc80fdeb:5d5393d7493c

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage iAs reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage iAs reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference393939
Alternative weighting393939

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food1100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-033b43fe560c:691ff8cbb4ed

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage tHg reference · Cabbage, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage tHg reference · Cabbage, as sold. Cabbage, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤0.11≤0.30.05–1 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤0.11≤0.30.05–1 (bounded)

62 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food3333%
FDA Total Diet Study2733%
Dabeka et al. 2003233%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-47ea1e369dc0:1ed1cf21a93a

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage tHg reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage tHg reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference132744
Alternative weighting132744

19 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Kipelo et al. 202519100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-b2f799542db8:88dd889e64d9

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Ni reference · Cabbage, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Ni reference · Cabbage, as sold. Cabbage, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤3535–37.5 (bounded)35–40 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤3535–37.5 (bounded)35–40 (bounded)

28 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study2750%
Dearing et al. 2025150%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-8354b8193529:d2402ef644d5

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Ni reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Ni reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference176–353 (bounded)353–355 (bounded)2700
Alternative weighting176–353 (bounded)353–355 (bounded)2700

24 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Kipelo et al. 20251933%
Nisa et al. 2020133%
Sultana et al. 2022433%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-0c525c2f0cb7:a89535b6bacf

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Cr reference · Cabbage, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Cr reference · Cabbage, as sold. Cabbage, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤5≤105–50 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤5≤105–50 (bounded)

29 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study2733%
Reczajska et al. 2005133%
See et al. 2025133%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-991e23dbac13:e3bf0c224ba8

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Cr reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Cr reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference112013502200
Alternative weighting112013502200

23 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Kipelo et al. 20251950%
Sultana et al. 2022450%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-214d0f635e61:25e0312ff277

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Sn reference · Cabbage, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Sn reference · Cabbage, as sold. Cabbage, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤10≤10≤10
Alternative weighting≤10≤10≤10

4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food4100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-73b94f880780:d46003360acf

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Sn reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Sn reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference7809201080
Alternative weighting7809201080

19 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Kipelo et al. 202519100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-6f9602405ad3:c0b74757cb75

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Sb reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Sb reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference60110170
Alternative weighting60110170

19 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Kipelo et al. 202519100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-7002fbfbafe1:f69325a039ed

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage U reference · Cabbage, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage U reference · Cabbage, as sold. Cabbage, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤1≤1≤1
Alternative weighting≤1≤1≤1

27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study27100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-8b8174502cf7:b5697411ed18

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Co reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Co reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference200366366
Alternative weighting200366366

20 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Kipelo et al. 20251950%
Nisa et al. 2020150%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-9ed870258774:194822dc2f2b

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Cu reference · Cabbage, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Cu reference · Cabbage, as sold. Cabbage, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤10≤10≤10
Alternative weighting≤10≤10≤10

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
See et al. 20251100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

See et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-5eb00ad16d1a:b361074c09de

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Cu reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Cu reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference317283023600
Alternative weighting317283023600

20 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Kipelo et al. 20251950%
Nisa et al. 2020150%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-89c866c5d72d:49b407876377

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Fe reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Fe reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference3890136000742000
Alternative weighting3890136000742000

20 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Kipelo et al. 20251950%
Nisa et al. 2020150%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-649afa331999:eb056f7c7d14

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Mn reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Mn reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference79933100290000
Alternative weighting79933100290000

20 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Kipelo et al. 20251950%
Nisa et al. 2020150%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-2ce3dc4ac0f3:cb65f14ccc7c

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Zn reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Zn reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference74200153000289000
Alternative weighting74200153000289000

19 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Kipelo et al. 202519100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-96dd16346fd8:d2812344fd3b

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage V reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage V reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference63011402280
Alternative weighting63011402280

19 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Kipelo et al. 202519100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-efc34e8c3d22:b2eeafdbedad

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Se reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Se reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference130170235
Alternative weighting130170235

16 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Kipelo et al. 202516100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-c706f455ee9b:46c0b2d2d088

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Ag reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Ag reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference101030
Alternative weighting101030

14 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Kipelo et al. 202514100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-479b07565159:acde503b6305

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Ba reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Ba reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference147003050044300
Alternative weighting147003050044300

19 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Kipelo et al. 202519100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-21141b45bce3:3542ca444675

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Mo reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Mo reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference66010502430
Alternative weighting66010502430

19 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Kipelo et al. 202519100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-aab68e6ef693:17abd536bda2

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI cabbage Ti reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI cabbage Ti reference · Cabbage, as sold, dry weight. Cabbage, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference50501140029000
Alternative weighting50501140029000

19 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Kipelo et al. 202519100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for cabbage, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Kipelo et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for cabbage, as sold on this basis in the completed cabbage ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:cabbage-5ac5432edb0f:a3d0bcde5f6f

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

1 dataset

How metals reach cabbage

The evidence on how metals reach cabbage comes from studies that compared exposed and ordinary settings. Cabbage, as sold from Ruschita (mining area R) (mining-affected area) had lead higher at 900 µg/kg, against 50 µg/kg for Borlova (reference area) in the same study.7Iosif Gergen, Monica Harmanescu · 2012Application of principal component analysis in the pollution assessment with heavy metals of vegetable food chain in the old mining areasChemistry Central Journal6:156Read source → In another study, cabbage, as sold from Ruschita old mining area (R) (mining-affected area) had lead higher at 900 µg/kg, against 50 µg/kg for Borlova reference area (Ref) in the same study.20Harmanescu M, Alda LM, Bordean DM, Gogoasa I, Gergen I · 2011Heavy metals health risk assessment for population via consumption of vegetables grown in old mining area; a case study: Banat County, RomaniaChemistry Central Journal 2011, 5:64Read source →

These are observational comparisons from single studies; the size of the difference depends on the site, metal and distance.

Which forms and regions measured lower

The HMI reference for lead in cabbage, as sold pools 26 subgroup units from 5 sampling families, with a median of between 185 and 773 µg/kg and a middle half spanning below 150 (lower quartile) and between 773 and 7,290 µg/kg (upper quartile).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →9Ametepey ST, Cobbina SJ, Akpabey FJ, Duwiejua AB, Atule AA · 2018Determination of heavy metals in selected vegetables from markets in Tamale Metropolis, GhanaInternational Journal of Food ContaminationRead source →14Sultana R, Tanvir RU, Hussain KA, Chamon AS, Mondol MN · 2022Heavy Metals in Commonly Consumed Root and Leafy Vegetables in Dhaka City, Bangladesh, and Assessment of Associated Public Health RisksEnvironmental Systems ResearchRead source →21Kipelo AM, Jothilakshmi M, Al Salah DMM, Ngweme GN, Atibu EK, Mulaji C, Sivalingam P, Pote-Wembonyama J · 2025Contamination level and dietary risk assessment of trace elements in Brassica pekinensis Lour. from gardening areas under tropical conditionsToxicology Reports 15 (2025) 102165Read source →22Nisa KU, Samiullah, Khan N, Attiq-ur-Rehman · 2020Detection of Heavy metals in Fruits and Vegetables available in the Market of Quetta cityAl-Nahrain Journal of Science 23(1):47-56Read source → For lead in cabbage, as sold, the reference median was below 4 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 4 to below 4 µg/kg across 135 units.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →23See SN, Pak Dek MS, Sanny M, Shukri R, Ramli NS · 2025Heavy Metals Assessment in Selected Leafy Vegetables from Selangor, MalaysiaPertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural ScienceRead source →24Spungen JH, et al. · 2024Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source → For cadmium in cabbage, as sold, the reference median was between 4.9 and 5.7 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 4 to 6 µg/kg across 118 units.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →23See SN, Pak Dek MS, Sanny M, Shukri R, Ramli NS · 2025Heavy Metals Assessment in Selected Leafy Vegetables from Selangor, MalaysiaPertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural ScienceRead source →25Dearing C, Ye Z, Robertshaw G · 2025Assessment of Heavy Metals in Organic and Non-Organic Vegetables Post Severe Tropical Cyclone Gabrielle: A cross-sectional comparative analysisF1000ResearchRead source →

Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, cabbage, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (2.3 µg/kg) and the highest in PAHO (185 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in EURO (3.88 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (195 µg/kg).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For total arsenic, the lowest regional median was in EURO (4.1 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (6.9 µg/kg).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

Targeted cabbage, as sold samples in SEARO had lead equal to at 20 µg/kg, against 20 µg/kg for SEARO in the same study.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

In one study, lead across 19 groups of cabbage ranged from 1,220 µg/kg (Lutendele) to 30,900 µg/kg (Cecomaf); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.21Kipelo AM, Jothilakshmi M, Al Salah DMM, Ngweme GN, Atibu EK, Mulaji C, Sivalingam P, Pote-Wembonyama J · 2025Contamination level and dietary risk assessment of trace elements in Brassica pekinensis Lour. from gardening areas under tropical conditionsToxicology Reports 15 (2025) 102165Read source → In another study, cadmium across 8 groups of cabbage ranged from 3.88 µg/kg (EURO) to 74.5 µg/kg (WPRO); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

Processing, cooking and preparation

No processing study for metals in this food is in the library yet.

Mitigation for cabbage

Lot testing against the applicable limit is the check that can be verified.

No measured way to lower metals in this food is in the library yet.

Trade-offs and limits of controls

Avoiding exposed growing areas lowered the metal measured in the studies available, but no study measured the cost or supply effect of doing so.7Iosif Gergen, Monica Harmanescu · 2012Application of principal component analysis in the pollution assessment with heavy metals of vegetable food chain in the old mining areasChemistry Central Journal6:156Read source → Metals do not move together, so a lot that passes a lead limit says little about cadmium, arsenic or nickel unless those are tested as well.

Testing cabbage for metals

Results depend on the method and its reporting limit. Reporting limits for lead ranged from 0.5 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 10,000 µg/kg (Sultana et al. 2022), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →14Sultana R, Tanvir RU, Hussain KA, Chamon AS, Mondol MN · 2022Heavy Metals in Commonly Consumed Root and Leafy Vegetables in Dhaka City, Bangladesh, and Assessment of Associated Public Health RisksEnvironmental Systems ResearchRead source → Reporting limits for cadmium ranged from 0.1 µg/kg (Al-Salimi et al. 2026) to 63 µg/kg (Kipelo et al. 2025), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.21Kipelo AM, Jothilakshmi M, Al Salah DMM, Ngweme GN, Atibu EK, Mulaji C, Sivalingam P, Pote-Wembonyama J · 2025Contamination level and dietary risk assessment of trace elements in Brassica pekinensis Lour. from gardening areas under tropical conditionsToxicology Reports 15 (2025) 102165Read source →26Al-Salimi MSS, Saeed AAM, Bin Yahia AA · 2026Lead and trace element contamination in market vegetables of Aden, Yemen: a human health risk assessmentDiscover Chemistry (2026) 3:83Read source → Reporting limits for total arsenic ranged from 0.2 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 600 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

A useful lot result names the form, the basis and a quantification limit well below the limit that applies.

Buying and verifying cabbage

No maximum level for metals in cabbage was verified from primary text for this page; buyers should confirm the limit that applies in the destination market.

Exposure from cabbage

No source in the library converted cabbage concentrations into a verified estimate of intake for a defined population. Concentrations describe the food, not individual risk.

Evidence review and remaining gaps

Every source record that names cabbage was decided on its content: 51 occurrence extracted, 51 records in all. The occurrence table renders every extracted result; held values remain visible with their reason.

References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.

Cabbage FAQs

What heavy metals are found in cabbage?

The library reports lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ag, As, Ba, Hg, Mo, Sr, Ti and Tl in cabbage, most often lead, cadmium and total arsenic.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Alimohammadi M, Younesian M, Madihi-Bidgoli S, Nabizadeh Nodehi R, Jahed Khaniki GR, Hadi M, Ghanbari F · 2018Heavy metal(oid)s concentration in Tehran supermarket vegetables: carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessmentToxin ReviewsRead source →4Antoine JMR, Hoo Fung LA, Grant CN · 2017Assessment of the potential health risks associated with the aluminium, arsenic, cadmium and lead content in selected fruits and vegetables grown in JamaicaToxicology Reports 4 (2017) 181-187Read source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in cabbage, as sold from 3,881 results in 5 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 2.3 to 185 µg/kg.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

How do heavy metals get into cabbage?

In the studies available, cabbage from contaminated or exposed settings carried more metal than cabbage from the same study’s control.7Iosif Gergen, Monica Harmanescu · 2012Application of principal component analysis in the pollution assessment with heavy metals of vegetable food chain in the old mining areasChemistry Central Journal6:156Read source → Cabbage, as sold from Moldova Noua (mining area M) (mining-affected area) had lead higher at 250 µg/kg, against 50 µg/kg for Borlova (reference area) in the same study.7Iosif Gergen, Monica Harmanescu · 2012Application of principal component analysis in the pollution assessment with heavy metals of vegetable food chain in the old mining areasChemistry Central Journal6:156Read source →

Which regions report the lowest levels in cabbage?

Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, cabbage, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (2.3 µg/kg) and the highest in PAHO (185 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in EURO (3.88 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (195 µg/kg).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

How much of the arsenic in cabbage is inorganic?

Inorganic arsenic, the more toxic form, was measured in 11 results from 3 sources, far fewer than total arsenic.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →27Baxter M, Brereton N · 2015Total Diet Study of metals and other elements in foodFood and Environment Research Agency report for the UK Food Standards Agency, Fera report 15/06, project FS102081Read source →28Centre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR · 2012The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source → Centre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012 reported inorganic arsenic at 2 µg/kg (mean) in cabbage, as sold from all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites).28Centre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR · 2012The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →

References

Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.

  1. GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsWorld Health Organization · GEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment Programme · 2026 · extranet.who.intDataset
  2. FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsU.S. Food and Drug Administration · FDA Total Diet Study · 2022 · www.fda.govDataset
  3. Heavy metal(oid)s concentration in Tehran supermarket vegetables: carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessmentAlimohammadi M, Younesian M, Madihi-Bidgoli S, Nabizadeh Nodehi R, Jahed Khaniki GR, Hadi M, et al. · Toxin Reviews · 2018 · doi.org/10.1080/15569543.2018.1522644Peer-reviewed
  4. Assessment of the potential health risks associated with the aluminium, arsenic, cadmium and lead content in selected fruits and vegetables grown in JamaicaAntoine JMR, Hoo Fung LA, and Grant CN · Toxicology Reports 4 (2017) 181-187 · 2017 · doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2017.03.006Peer-reviewed
  5. Probabilistic carcinogenic and health risk assessment of heavy metals in lettuce and cabbage from Behbahan, Iran, using Monte Carlo simulationArmand R, Rafati L, Mohammadi H, and Armand N · Scientific Reports · 2026 · doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40958-wPeer-reviewed
  6. Total and bioaccessible heavy metals in cabbageUnknown authors · Peer-reviewed article · 2021 · doi.org/10.1039/d1ra01440dPeer-reviewed
  7. Application of principal component analysis in the pollution assessment with heavy metals of vegetable food chain in the old mining areasIosif Gergen and Monica Harmanescu · Chemistry Central Journal6:156 · 2012 · doi.org/10.1186/1752-153x-6-156Peer-reviewed
  8. Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthGuerra F, Trevizam AR, Muraoka T, Marcante NC, and Canniatti-Brazaca SG · Scientia Agricola 69(1):54-60 · 2012 · doi.org/10.1590/s0103-90162012000100008Peer-reviewed
  9. Determination of heavy metals in selected vegetables from markets in Tamale Metropolis, GhanaAmetepey ST, Cobbina SJ, Akpabey FJ, Duwiejua AB, and Atule AA · International Journal of Food Contamination · 2018 · doi.org/10.1186/s40550-018-0067-0Peer-reviewed
  10. Environmental surveillance of commonly-grown vegetables for investigating potential lead and chromium contamination intensification in BangladeshHossain AMMM, Islam MS, Mamun MM, Al-Jonaed HM, Imran M, Rahman MH, et al. · SpringerPlus · 2016 · doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3458-9Peer-reviewed
  11. Detection of heavy metals concentration in vegetables andUnknown authors · Peer-reviewed article · 2025 · doi.org/10.11591/ijphs.v14i4.26823Peer-reviewed
  12. Analysis of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs and an Assessment of the Health Risks to the General Public via Consumption in Beijing, ChinaLiang G, Gong W, Li B, Zuo J, Pan L, and Liu X · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2019 · doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16060909Peer-reviewed
  13. Analysis of Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals in Water, Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) and Tilapia Fish (Oreochromis niloticus) from Unreclaimed Mining PitsOkonofua ES, Komolafe AS, Emeribe CN, Ogbomida ET, and Butu AW · Earth Sciences Pakistan · 2024 · doi.org/10.26480/esp.02.2024.134.139Peer-reviewed
  14. Heavy Metals in Commonly Consumed Root and Leafy Vegetables in Dhaka City, Bangladesh, and Assessment of Associated Public Health RisksSultana R, Tanvir RU, Hussain KA, Chamon AS, and Mondol MN · Environmental Systems Research · 2022 · doi.org/10.1186/s40068-022-00261-9Peer-reviewed
  15. Compound health risk assessment of cumulative heavy metal exposure: A case study of a village near a battery factory in Henan Province, ChinaJiang Y, Ma J, and Ruan X · Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts · 2020 · doi.org/10.1039/D0EM00104JPeer-reviewed
  16. Contamination and health risk assessment of lead, arsenic, cadmium, and aluminum from a total diet study of Jilin Province, ChinaWang B, Liu Y, Wang H, Cui L, Zhang Z, Guo J, et al. · Food Science & Nutrition · 2020 · doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1851Peer-reviewed
  17. Accumulation of potentially toxic trace elements in vegetables collected from selected vegetable-based cropping systems in Sri Lanka, and estimation of their dietary intakesSilva NRN, Attanayake CP, Vitharana WAU, and Weerasinghe P · Journal of Dry Zone Agriculture 2025, 11(1):1-16 · 2025 · doi.org/10.4038/jdza.v11i1.116Peer-reviewed
  18. Levels and potential health risk of heavy metals in marketed vegetables in Zhejiang, ChinaPan X-D, Wu P-G, and Jiang X-G · Scientific Reports · 2016 · doi.org/10.1038/srep20317Peer-reviewed
  19. Determination of some heavy metals and their potential risk in selected vegetables on sale within Kaduna Metropolis, Kaduna State, NigeriaImongben CO, Tomori WB, Umoru PE, and Oyerinde WA · World Nutrition · 2026 · doi.org/10.26596/wn.20261718-18Peer-reviewed
  20. Heavy metals health risk assessment for population via consumption of vegetables grown in old mining area; a case study: Banat County, RomaniaHarmanescu M, Alda LM, Bordean DM, Gogoasa I, and Gergen I · Chemistry Central Journal 2011, 5:64 · 2011 · doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-5-64Peer-reviewed
  21. Contamination level and dietary risk assessment of trace elements in Brassica pekinensis Lour. from gardening areas under tropical conditionsKipelo AM, Jothilakshmi M, Al Salah DMM, Ngweme GN, Atibu EK, Mulaji C, et al. · Toxicology Reports 15 (2025) 102165 · 2025 · doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2025.102165Peer-reviewed
  22. Detection of Heavy metals in Fruits and Vegetables available in the Market of Quetta cityNisa KU, Samiullah, Khan N, and Attiq-ur-Rehman · Al-Nahrain Journal of Science 23(1):47-56 · 2020 · doi.org/10.22401/anjs.23.1.07Peer-reviewed
  23. Heavy Metals Assessment in Selected Leafy Vegetables from Selangor, MalaysiaSee SN, Pak Dek MS, Sanny M, Shukri R, and Ramli NS · Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science · 2025 · doi.org/10.47836/pjtas.48.1.12Peer-reviewed
  24. Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Spungen JH and et al. · Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A · 2024 · doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2024.2396910Peer-reviewed
  25. Assessment of Heavy Metals in Organic and Non-Organic Vegetables Post Severe Tropical Cyclone Gabrielle: A cross-sectional comparative analysisDearing C, Ye Z, and Robertshaw G · F1000Research · 2025 · doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.175538.1Peer-reviewed
  26. Lead and trace element contamination in market vegetables of Aden, Yemen: a human health risk assessmentAl-Salimi MSS, Saeed AAM, and Bin Yahia AA · Discover Chemistry (2026) 3:83 · 2026 · doi.org/10.1007/s44371-026-00553-4Peer-reviewed
  27. Total Diet Study of metals and other elements in foodBaxter M and Brereton N · Food and Environment Research Agency report for the UK Food Standards Agency, Fera report 15/06, project FS102081 · 2015 · www.food.gov.ukGovernment
  28. The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR · Centre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region · 2012 · www.cfs.gov.hkGovernment

Sources

Browse Cabbage Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.

Update history

22 October 2026: Rebuilt from every cabbage record in the library: 51 occurrence sources, references by form and basis, same-study contrasts.