Melon in the HMI library has 192 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V and B from 17 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →3Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in AlgeriaFood and Chemical ToxicologyRead source →4Monitoring of Heavy Metal Content in Fruits and Vegetables Collected from Production and Market Sites in the Misurata Area of LibyaISRN Analytical ChemistryRead source →5Toxic and Essential Metals in Staple Foods Commonly Consumed by Students in Ekiti State, South West, NigeriaInternational Journal of ChemistryRead source →6Trace and Macro Elements Concentrations in Selected Fresh Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs, and Processed Foods in North Carolina, USAJournal of Environmental Protection, 2015, 6, 573-583Read source →
-
Metals measured:
Lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury and nickel and others, in 192 results from 17 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →3Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in AlgeriaFood and Chemical ToxicologyRead source →4Monitoring of Heavy Metal Content in Fruits and Vegetables Collected from Production and Market Sites in the Misurata Area of LibyaISRN Analytical ChemistryRead source →
-
Main drivers:
Form, basis and where the melon was sampled; reporting limits decide how many results are non-detects.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →3Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in AlgeriaFood and Chemical ToxicologyRead source →4Monitoring of Heavy Metal Content in Fruits and Vegetables Collected from Production and Market Sites in the Misurata Area of LibyaISRN Analytical ChemistryRead source →
-
Practical framing:
Ask for lot results with a quantification limit well below the limit that applies in the destination market.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →3Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in AlgeriaFood and Chemical ToxicologyRead source →4Monitoring of Heavy Metal Content in Fruits and Vegetables Collected from Production and Market Sites in the Misurata Area of LibyaISRN Analytical ChemistryRead source →
Melon overview
Melon in the HMI library has 192 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V and B from 17 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →3Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in AlgeriaFood and Chemical ToxicologyRead source →4Monitoring of Heavy Metal Content in Fruits and Vegetables Collected from Production and Market Sites in the Misurata Area of LibyaISRN Analytical ChemistryRead source →5Toxic and Essential Metals in Staple Foods Commonly Consumed by Students in Ekiti State, South West, NigeriaInternational Journal of ChemistryRead source →6Trace and Macro Elements Concentrations in Selected Fresh Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs, and Processed Foods in North Carolina, USAJournal of Environmental Protection, 2015, 6, 573-583Read source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in melon, as sold from 536 results in 4 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 1.3 to 12 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, GEMS/Food gave subgroup medians from 3 to 11.7 µg/kg from 587 results.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Across 2 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported lead means and medians on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis ranged from 0.4 µg/kg (Ibanga et al. 2019) to 540 µg/kg (Guerra et al. 2012).2Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →7Studies on chemical elements and anti-nutrients compositions of three traditional vegetable oils in NigeriaJournal of Agricultural Science and Practice 4(5), 144-150Read source → For cadmium, 2 studies on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis reported means and medians from 0.5 µg/kg (Dearing et al. 2025) to 20 µg/kg (Guerra et al. 2012).2Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →8Assessment of Heavy Metals in Organic and Non-Organic Vegetables Post Severe Tropical Cyclone Gabrielle: A cross-sectional comparative analysisF1000ResearchRead source →
For a buyer the practical points are the form bought, the basis a result is reported on, where the melon came from and the laboratory’s reporting limit. Testing finds contamination but does not remove it.
What counts as melon
This page covers melon in 3 forms kept separate in every comparison: melon, as sold (181 results), melon, peel or outer layer (7 results) and melon, oil (4 results).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →3Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in AlgeriaFood and Chemical ToxicologyRead source →4Monitoring of Heavy Metal Content in Fruits and Vegetables Collected from Production and Market Sites in the Misurata Area of LibyaISRN Analytical ChemistryRead source →5Toxic and Essential Metals in Staple Foods Commonly Consumed by Students in Ekiti State, South West, NigeriaInternational Journal of ChemistryRead source →6Trace and Macro Elements Concentrations in Selected Fresh Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs, and Processed Foods in North Carolina, USAJournal of Environmental Protection, 2015, 6, 573-583Read source →
Results stay on the basis each source reports: as sold or fresh weight, dry weight, or unstated. Dry-weight, as-sold and unstated results are never pooled, and no moisture conversion is applied.
Heavy metal contamination profile of melon
The table holds every extracted melon result: one row for each statistic a source reports for a form, group and metal, 192 rows in all, grouped by metal and form; percentiles, ranges and maxima for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →3Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in AlgeriaFood and Chemical ToxicologyRead source →4Monitoring of Heavy Metal Content in Fruits and Vegetables Collected from Production and Market Sites in the Misurata Area of LibyaISRN Analytical ChemistryRead source →5Toxic and Essential Metals in Staple Foods Commonly Consumed by Students in Ekiti State, South West, NigeriaInternational Journal of ChemistryRead source →6Trace and Macro Elements Concentrations in Selected Fresh Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs, and Processed Foods in North Carolina, USAJournal of Environmental Protection, 2015, 6, 573-583Read source → Monitoring medians are HMI calculations from individual submissions; non-detects remain intervals between zero and the reporting limit and are never read as zero.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
12 rows can be rated against an HMI reference for the same form and basis, 10 rows have a direct same-study comparison, and the rest stay unrated with the reason recorded. 5 values from 3 sources failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.3Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in AlgeriaFood and Chemical ToxicologyRead source →7Studies on chemical elements and anti-nutrients compositions of three traditional vegetable oils in NigeriaJournal of Agricultural Science and Practice 4(5), 144-150Read source →9Determination of heavy metals contamination in some vegetables and fruits samples from the market of Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh StateIOSR Journal of Applied ChemistryRead source →
Comparison methods and scope
Each row is one statistic a source reports for one form of melon, group and metal; percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Different forms and preparation states are kept apart, and dry-weight results never share a reference with as-sold or fresh-weight results. Ratings place a result against an HMI reference built from monitoring results and ordinary-setting medians for the same form and basis. Same-study contrasts compare a contaminated or treated site with its control, targeted with random sampling, a prepared form with the unprocessed one, or one group of a study with the median of its other groups. Held rows failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.
First displayed analyte: Lead: 35 findings from 12 sources. Each row retains its statistic and measurement basis.
Filter findings
188 of 188 findings · 17 analytes
About this table
| Food form | Collection scope | Finding (µg/kg) | Comparison | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
33 findings · 11 studies | ||||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2010As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2004As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2000–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2011–2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2012–2014As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2007–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2000As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldCherfi et al. 2014 | Boumerdes wholesale markets2012Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012 | all samples2010Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldIyabo et al. 2015 | legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Melon, as soldMehari et al. 2015 | Greensboro grocery store, single productCollection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldMehari et al. 2015 | Greensboro grocery store, single productCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Melon, as soldNisa et al. 2020 | local market2019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Melon, as soldOrisakwe et al. 2012 | all samples (Ohaji, Umuagwo, Owerri sites)Collection date unreportedDry weight | not detected. | ||
| Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Klang farm 1 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Klang farm 2 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 1 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 2 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 3 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | mean of the five locationsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | mean of the five locations, with +/- as printed in Table 3Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | range across the five location means (highest)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | max. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | range across the five location means (lowest)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | min. | ||
| Melon, as soldSalhotra et al. 2017 | all samples (market, Jagdalpur)2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Melon, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020 | local market2019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Melon, oilIbanga et al. 2019 | manually extracted at laboratory from seeds bought at MondayCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
21 findings · 10 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2003–2019As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO1999–2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2015–2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2000As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldDearing et al. 2025 | genus Cucumis2024As sold / fresh | median.Same samples: 4 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Melon, as soldDearing et al. 2025 | genus Cucumis2024As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Melon, as soldDearing et al. 2025 | genus Momordica2024As sold / fresh | median.Same samples: 0.5 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Melon, as soldDearing et al. 2025 | genus Momordica2024As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Melon, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012 | all samples2010Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldIyabo et al. 2015 | legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Melon, as soldNisa et al. 2020 | local market2019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Melon, as soldOrisakwe et al. 2012 | all samples (Ohaji, Umuagwo, Owerri sites)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldSalhotra et al. 2017 | all samples (market, Jagdalpur)2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Melon, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020 | local market2019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
7 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2021As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2006–2023As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2009As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998–2000As sold / fresh | median. | ||
5 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012 | all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012 | all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 | European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not stated | mean. | ||
7 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2005–2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2016–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldDabeka et al. 2003 | Ottawa composite (retail Oct-Nov 2000)1998–2000As sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
| Melon, as soldDabeka et al. 2003 | Whitehorse composite (retail Jan-Feb 1998)1998–2000As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
15 findings · 8 studies · 2 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldDearing et al. 2025 | genus Cucumis2024As sold / fresh | median.Same samples: 94 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Melon, as soldDearing et al. 2025 | genus Cucumis2024As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Melon, as soldDearing et al. 2025 | genus Momordica2024As sold / fresh | median.Same samples: 57 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Melon, as soldDearing et al. 2025 | genus Momordica2024As sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Melon, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012 | all samples2010Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldNisa et al. 2020 | local market2019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Melon, as soldOrisakwe et al. 2012 | all samples (Ohaji, Umuagwo, Owerri sites)Collection date unreportedDry weight | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Klang farm 1 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Klang farm 2 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 1 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 2 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 3 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | mean of the five locationsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Melon, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020 | local market2019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
9 findings · 4 studies | ||||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldCherfi et al. 2014 | Boumerdes wholesale markets2012Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Klang farm 1 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Klang farm 2 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 1 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 2 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 3 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | mean of the five locationsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
12 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2000As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Klang farm 1 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Klang farm 2 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 1 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 2 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 3 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | mean of the five locationsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | mean of the five locations, with +/- as printed in Table 3Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | range across the five location means (lowest)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | min. | ||
6 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2007–2008As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO1998As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
10 findings · 5 studies | ||||
| Melon, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012 | all samples2010Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldNisa et al. 2020 | local market2019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Klang farm 1 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Klang farm 2 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 1 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 2 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 3 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | mean of the five locationsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Melon, as soldSalhotra et al. 2017 | all samples (market, Jagdalpur)2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Melon, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020 | local market2019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
14 findings · 6 studies | ||||
| Melon, as soldCherfi et al. 2014 | Boumerdes wholesale markets2012Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012 | all samples2010Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldIyabo et al. 2015 | legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Melon, as soldNisa et al. 2020 | local market2019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Klang farm 1 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Klang farm 2 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 1 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 2 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 3 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | mean of the five locationsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | mean of the five locations, with +/- as printed in Table 3Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | range across the five location means (highest)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | max. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | range across the five location means (lowest)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | min. | ||
| Melon, as soldSalhotra et al. 2017 | all samples (market, Jagdalpur)2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Melon, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020 | local market2019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Melon, oilIbanga et al. 2019 | manually extracted at laboratory from seeds bought at MondayCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
11 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Melon, as soldNisa et al. 2020 | local market2019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Klang farm 1 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Klang farm 2 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 1 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 2 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 3 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | mean of the five locationsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | mean of the five locations, with +/- as printed in Table 3Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | range across the five location means (highest)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | max. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | range across the five location means (lowest)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | min. | ||
| Melon, as soldSalhotra et al. 2017 | all samples (market, Jagdalpur)2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Melon, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020 | local market2019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Melon, oilIbanga et al. 2019 | manually extracted at laboratory from seeds bought at MondayCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
7 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Melon, as soldNisa et al. 2020 | local market2019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Klang farm 1 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Klang farm 2 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 1 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 2 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 3 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | mean of the five locationsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Melon, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020 | local market2019Dry weight | sample value. | ||
10 findings · 5 studies | ||||
| Melon, as soldCherfi et al. 2014 | Boumerdes wholesale markets2012Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012 | all samples2010Dry weight | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldIyabo et al. 2015 | legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weight | sample value. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Klang farm 1 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Klang farm 2 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 1 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 2 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 3 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | mean of the five locationsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldSalhotra et al. 2017 | all samples (market, Jagdalpur)2017Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Melon, oilIbanga et al. 2019 | manually extracted at laboratory from seeds bought at MondayCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
6 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Klang farm 1 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Klang farm 2 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 1 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 2 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | Mantin farm 3 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015 | mean of the five locationsCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
Shared dataset methods and interpretation
Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.
HMI melon Pb reference · Melon, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI melon Pb reference · Melon, as sold. Melon, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤3 | ≤5 | 1.65–10 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤3 | ≤5 | 1.4–9.5 (bounded) |
67 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 67 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-2934994822fb:a5c5841ef5dc
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon Pb reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI melon Pb reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight. Melon, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 100 | 678 | 4100 |
| Alternative weighting | 100 | 678 | 4100 |
3 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Iyabo et al. 2015 | 1 | 33% |
| Mehari et al. 2015 | 1 | 33% |
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-110bcf83b2a5:c3948df7a0cd
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon Pb reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI melon Pb reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Melon, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 275 | 275 | 275 |
| Alternative weighting | 275 | 275 | 275 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-ad9a3c55ec24:707e8ed826c6
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon Cd reference · Melon, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI melon Cd reference · Melon, as sold. Melon, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 0.5–0.75 (bounded) | 1 | 6–6.5 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | 0.5–0.75 (bounded) | 1 | 5.95–6.01 (bounded) |
65 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 63 | 50% |
| Dearing et al. 2025 | 2 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-825459250efc:08a4a8cd185a
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon Cd reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI melon Cd reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight. Melon, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 10 | 55.8 | 102 |
| Alternative weighting | 10 | 55.8 | 102 |
2 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Iyabo et al. 2015 | 1 | 50% |
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-75ea530550f6:519ace3297d2
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon Cd reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI melon Cd reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Melon, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 125 | 125 | 125 |
| Alternative weighting | 125 | 125 | 125 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-5a8680f772a9:aac02b041b24
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon tAs reference · Melon, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI melon tAs reference · Melon, as sold. Melon, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤9.7 | ≤13.9 | 13.9–24.1 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤9.63 | ≤13.9 | 6.55–29.5 (bounded) |
19 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 19 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-b427c590ae56:b5bf25e5453f
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon iAs reference · Melon, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI melon iAs reference · Melon, as sold. Melon, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 2.5–4 (bounded) | 6 | 7.5 |
| Alternative weighting | 2.5–4 (bounded) | 6 | 7.5 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-5456aba90122:bebdda970735
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon tHg reference · Melon, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI melon tHg reference · Melon, as sold. Melon, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤0.054 | 0.0125–0.07 (bounded) | 0.07–1.09 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | ≤0.054 | 0.025–0.07 (bounded) | 0.07–0.85 (bounded) |
16 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 14 | 50% |
| Dabeka et al. 2003 | 2 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-1be86dbd277d:d2dc5eeb1269
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon Ni reference · Melon, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI melon Ni reference · Melon, as sold. Melon, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 57 | 62 | 67 |
| Alternative weighting | 57 | 62 | 67 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Dearing et al. 2025 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Dearing et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-f8d4f07f350d:bb9695c7eef8
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon Ni reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI melon Ni reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight. Melon, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 193 | 193 | 193 |
| Alternative weighting | 193 | 193 | 193 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-2325c0f659e9:590c45862273
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon Ni reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI melon Ni reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Melon, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 161 | 161 | 161 |
| Alternative weighting | 161 | 161 | 161 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-17ba7cd7f091:bd37d4b73319
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon Al reference · Melon, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI melon Al reference · Melon, as sold. Melon, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤236 | 620–738 (bounded) | 1240 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤236 | 620–738 (bounded) | 1240 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-86ae7ed3c732:6478b283d507
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon Sn reference · Melon, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI melon Sn reference · Melon, as sold. Melon, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤5.47 | ≤10 | ≤10 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤3.48 | ≤7.73 | 2.73–10 (bounded) |
6 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 6 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-6cda66646ced:154dbe4d3dbb
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon Co reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI melon Co reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight. Melon, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 353 | 353 | 353 |
| Alternative weighting | 353 | 353 | 353 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-76f9369a3138:47a4b1faf71c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon Co reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI melon Co reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Melon, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 438 | 438 | 438 |
| Alternative weighting | 438 | 438 | 438 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-62120885626a:1fae036ffbf1
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon Cu reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI melon Cu reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight. Melon, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 306 | 1320 | 2340 |
| Alternative weighting | 306 | 1320 | 2340 |
2 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Iyabo et al. 2015 | 1 | 50% |
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-cca1972f72c6:7e0d3e432cb0
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon Cu reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI melon Cu reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Melon, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 574 | 574 | 574 |
| Alternative weighting | 574 | 574 | 574 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-d11e3998b6f8:a9c5aad0b095
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon Fe reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI melon Fe reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight. Melon, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 3130 | 3130 | 3130 |
| Alternative weighting | 3130 | 3130 | 3130 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-fda5bfd2e755:f9442f76de03
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon Fe reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI melon Fe reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Melon, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 3090 | 3090 | 3090 |
| Alternative weighting | 3090 | 3090 | 3090 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-e124914336ed:9b71c3ff6be5
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon Mn reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI melon Mn reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight. Melon, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 472 | 472 | 472 |
| Alternative weighting | 472 | 472 | 472 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-8fa364240dea:5aa8ce070223
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon Mn reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI melon Mn reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Melon, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 639 | 639 | 639 |
| Alternative weighting | 639 | 639 | 639 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Nisa et al. 2020 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-b304c04226e4:92b4e81a123f
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI melon Zn reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI melon Zn reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight. Melon, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 18900 | 18900 | 18900 |
| Alternative weighting | 18900 | 18900 | 18900 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Iyabo et al. 2015 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Iyabo et al. 2015 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-40917b44f592:c017282e939f
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
The source reports only a percentile, range or maximum for these samples, with no mean or median to place against the reference. Spread figures that do have a mean or median are shown on that row instead.
The value could not be reconciled with its own paper, so it is shown but not compared.
The result is below a reporting limit, and the range from zero to that limit crosses more than one band.
No medians or sample values exist for this form and metal, so no HMI reference could be built.
The HMI reference for this form has fewer than four units or no measurable spread, below the display minimum.
The result is on a basis (dry weight, or not stated) that no HMI reference for this form uses, so it cannot be placed.
Reporting limits overlap the study comparison, so no direction can be shown.
No findings match these filters. Change the selection or reset to show all source findings.
How metals reach melon
No study in the library compared melon from contaminated and ordinary settings, so the routes by which metals reach it are not measured here.
Which forms and regions measured lower
The HMI reference for lead in melon, as sold pools 67 subgroup units from 1 sampling family, with a median of below 5 µg/kg and a middle half spanning below 3 (lower quartile) and between 1.65 and 10 µg/kg (upper quartile).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium in melon, as sold, the reference median was 1 µg/kg, with a middle half from between 0.5 and 0.75 to between 6 and 6.5 µg/kg across 65 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →8Assessment of Heavy Metals in Organic and Non-Organic Vegetables Post Severe Tropical Cyclone Gabrielle: A cross-sectional comparative analysisF1000ResearchRead source → For total arsenic in melon, as sold, the reference median was below 13.9 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 9.7 to between 13.9 and 24.1 µg/kg across 19 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, melon, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (1.3 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (12 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in WPRO (3.5 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (11.7 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For total arsenic, the lowest regional median was in EURO (16.4 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (19 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Processing, cooking and preparation
Processed or prepared forms were compared only with unprocessed melon in the same study and group. Melon, peel or outer layer (local market) had lead lower at 275 µg/kg, against 678 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (melon, as sold).10Detection of Heavy metals in Fruits and Vegetables available in the Market of Quetta cityAl-Nahrain Journal of Science 23(1):47-56Read source →
Forms differ in water content, so a per-kilogram difference is not by itself a measured removal or gain of metal.
Mitigation for melon
Lot testing against the applicable limit is the check that can be verified.
No measured way to lower metals in this food is in the library yet.
Trade-offs and limits of controls
Metals do not move together, so a lot that passes a lead limit says little about cadmium, arsenic or nickel unless those are tested as well.
Testing melon for metals
Results depend on the method and its reporting limit. Reporting limits for lead ranged from 2 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 3,000 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Reporting limits for cadmium ranged from 0.5 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 50 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Reporting limits for total arsenic ranged from 2 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 300 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
A useful lot result names the form, the basis and a quantification limit well below the limit that applies.
Buying and verifying melon
No maximum level for metals in melon was verified from primary text for this page; buyers should confirm the limit that applies in the destination market.
Exposure from melon
No source in the library converted melon concentrations into a verified estimate of intake for a defined population. Concentrations describe the food, not individual risk.
Evidence review and remaining gaps
Every source record that names melon was decided on its content: 17 occurrence extracted, 17 records in all. The occurrence table renders every extracted result; held values remain visible with their reason.
References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.
Melon FAQs
What heavy metals are found in melon?
The library reports lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V and B in melon, most often lead, cadmium and total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →3Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in AlgeriaFood and Chemical ToxicologyRead source →4Monitoring of Heavy Metal Content in Fruits and Vegetables Collected from Production and Market Sites in the Misurata Area of LibyaISRN Analytical ChemistryRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in melon, as sold from 536 results in 4 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 1.3 to 12 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Which regions report the lowest levels in melon?
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, melon, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (1.3 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (12 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in WPRO (3.5 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (11.7 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Does processing change heavy metals in melon?
Only comparisons between forms in the same study are available, not before-and-after measurements of the same melon.10Detection of Heavy metals in Fruits and Vegetables available in the Market of Quetta cityAl-Nahrain Journal of Science 23(1):47-56Read source → Melon, peel or outer layer (local market) had lead lower at 275 µg/kg, against 678 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (melon, as sold).10Detection of Heavy metals in Fruits and Vegetables available in the Market of Quetta cityAl-Nahrain Journal of Science 23(1):47-56Read source →
How much of the arsenic in melon is inorganic?
Inorganic arsenic, the more toxic form, was measured in 5 results from 3 sources, far fewer than total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →11The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →12Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597Read source → Across 2 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported inorganic arsenic means and medians with the basis not stated ranged from 4 µg/kg (Centre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012) to 6.3 µg/kg (European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014).11The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →12Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597Read source →
References
Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.
- GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsDataset
- Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthPeer-reviewed
- Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in AlgeriaPeer-reviewed
- Monitoring of Heavy Metal Content in Fruits and Vegetables Collected from Production and Market Sites in the Misurata Area of LibyaPeer-reviewed
- Toxic and Essential Metals in Staple Foods Commonly Consumed by Students in Ekiti State, South West, NigeriaPeer-reviewed
- Trace and Macro Elements Concentrations in Selected Fresh Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs, and Processed Foods in North Carolina, USAPeer-reviewed
- Studies on chemical elements and anti-nutrients compositions of three traditional vegetable oils in NigeriaPeer-reviewed
- Assessment of Heavy Metals in Organic and Non-Organic Vegetables Post Severe Tropical Cyclone Gabrielle: A cross-sectional comparative analysisPeer-reviewed
- Determination of heavy metals contamination in some vegetables and fruits samples from the market of Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh StatePeer-reviewed
- Detection of Heavy metals in Fruits and Vegetables available in the Market of Quetta cityPeer-reviewed
- The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicGovernment
- Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationGovernment
Sources
Browse Melon Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.
Update history
22 October 2026: Rebuilt from every melon record in the library: 17 occurrence sources, references by form and basis, same-study contrasts.
