Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index
Cantaloupe, honeydew, watermelon and a bowl of mixed fruit illustrating melon ingredient context.

Heavy metals in Melon

Lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic and total mercury in melon: monitoring results, studies, references by form and basis, limits, testing and controls.

Quick read

Melon in the HMI library has 192 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V and B from 17 sources.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Guerra F, Trevizam AR, Muraoka T, Marcante NC, Canniatti-Brazaca SG · 2012Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →3Cherfi A, Abdoun S, Gaci O · 2014Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in AlgeriaFood and Chemical ToxicologyRead source →4Elbagermi MA, Edwards HGM, Alajtal AI · 2012Monitoring of Heavy Metal Content in Fruits and Vegetables Collected from Production and Market Sites in the Misurata Area of LibyaISRN Analytical ChemistryRead source →5Iyabo OO, Ogundiran MB, Adebayo OL · 2015Toxic and Essential Metals in Staple Foods Commonly Consumed by Students in Ekiti State, South West, NigeriaInternational Journal of ChemistryRead source →6Mehari TF, Greene L, Duncan AL, Fakayode SO · 2015Trace and Macro Elements Concentrations in Selected Fresh Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs, and Processed Foods in North Carolina, USAJournal of Environmental Protection, 2015, 6, 573-583Read source →

Melon overview

Melon in the HMI library has 192 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V and B from 17 sources.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Guerra F, Trevizam AR, Muraoka T, Marcante NC, Canniatti-Brazaca SG · 2012Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →3Cherfi A, Abdoun S, Gaci O · 2014Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in AlgeriaFood and Chemical ToxicologyRead source →4Elbagermi MA, Edwards HGM, Alajtal AI · 2012Monitoring of Heavy Metal Content in Fruits and Vegetables Collected from Production and Market Sites in the Misurata Area of LibyaISRN Analytical ChemistryRead source →5Iyabo OO, Ogundiran MB, Adebayo OL · 2015Toxic and Essential Metals in Staple Foods Commonly Consumed by Students in Ekiti State, South West, NigeriaInternational Journal of ChemistryRead source →6Mehari TF, Greene L, Duncan AL, Fakayode SO · 2015Trace and Macro Elements Concentrations in Selected Fresh Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs, and Processed Foods in North Carolina, USAJournal of Environmental Protection, 2015, 6, 573-583Read source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in melon, as sold from 536 results in 4 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 1.3 to 12 µg/kg.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, GEMS/Food gave subgroup medians from 3 to 11.7 µg/kg from 587 results.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

Across 2 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported lead means and medians on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis ranged from 0.4 µg/kg (Ibanga et al. 2019) to 540 µg/kg (Guerra et al. 2012).2Guerra F, Trevizam AR, Muraoka T, Marcante NC, Canniatti-Brazaca SG · 2012Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →7Ibanga UI, Fakunle JO, Raji AO, Sogunle KA · 2019Studies on chemical elements and anti-nutrients compositions of three traditional vegetable oils in NigeriaJournal of Agricultural Science and Practice 4(5), 144-150Read source → For cadmium, 2 studies on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis reported means and medians from 0.5 µg/kg (Dearing et al. 2025) to 20 µg/kg (Guerra et al. 2012).2Guerra F, Trevizam AR, Muraoka T, Marcante NC, Canniatti-Brazaca SG · 2012Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →8Dearing C, Ye Z, Robertshaw G · 2025Assessment of Heavy Metals in Organic and Non-Organic Vegetables Post Severe Tropical Cyclone Gabrielle: A cross-sectional comparative analysisF1000ResearchRead source →

For a buyer the practical points are the form bought, the basis a result is reported on, where the melon came from and the laboratory’s reporting limit. Testing finds contamination but does not remove it.

What counts as melon

This page covers melon in 3 forms kept separate in every comparison: melon, as sold (181 results), melon, peel or outer layer (7 results) and melon, oil (4 results).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Guerra F, Trevizam AR, Muraoka T, Marcante NC, Canniatti-Brazaca SG · 2012Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →3Cherfi A, Abdoun S, Gaci O · 2014Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in AlgeriaFood and Chemical ToxicologyRead source →4Elbagermi MA, Edwards HGM, Alajtal AI · 2012Monitoring of Heavy Metal Content in Fruits and Vegetables Collected from Production and Market Sites in the Misurata Area of LibyaISRN Analytical ChemistryRead source →5Iyabo OO, Ogundiran MB, Adebayo OL · 2015Toxic and Essential Metals in Staple Foods Commonly Consumed by Students in Ekiti State, South West, NigeriaInternational Journal of ChemistryRead source →6Mehari TF, Greene L, Duncan AL, Fakayode SO · 2015Trace and Macro Elements Concentrations in Selected Fresh Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs, and Processed Foods in North Carolina, USAJournal of Environmental Protection, 2015, 6, 573-583Read source →

Results stay on the basis each source reports: as sold or fresh weight, dry weight, or unstated. Dry-weight, as-sold and unstated results are never pooled, and no moisture conversion is applied.

Heavy metal contamination profile of melon

The table holds every extracted melon result: one row for each statistic a source reports for a form, group and metal, 192 rows in all, grouped by metal and form; percentiles, ranges and maxima for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Guerra F, Trevizam AR, Muraoka T, Marcante NC, Canniatti-Brazaca SG · 2012Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →3Cherfi A, Abdoun S, Gaci O · 2014Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in AlgeriaFood and Chemical ToxicologyRead source →4Elbagermi MA, Edwards HGM, Alajtal AI · 2012Monitoring of Heavy Metal Content in Fruits and Vegetables Collected from Production and Market Sites in the Misurata Area of LibyaISRN Analytical ChemistryRead source →5Iyabo OO, Ogundiran MB, Adebayo OL · 2015Toxic and Essential Metals in Staple Foods Commonly Consumed by Students in Ekiti State, South West, NigeriaInternational Journal of ChemistryRead source →6Mehari TF, Greene L, Duncan AL, Fakayode SO · 2015Trace and Macro Elements Concentrations in Selected Fresh Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs, and Processed Foods in North Carolina, USAJournal of Environmental Protection, 2015, 6, 573-583Read source → Monitoring medians are HMI calculations from individual submissions; non-detects remain intervals between zero and the reporting limit and are never read as zero.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

12 rows can be rated against an HMI reference for the same form and basis, 10 rows have a direct same-study comparison, and the rest stay unrated with the reason recorded. 5 values from 3 sources failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.3Cherfi A, Abdoun S, Gaci O · 2014Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in AlgeriaFood and Chemical ToxicologyRead source →7Ibanga UI, Fakunle JO, Raji AO, Sogunle KA · 2019Studies on chemical elements and anti-nutrients compositions of three traditional vegetable oils in NigeriaJournal of Agricultural Science and Practice 4(5), 144-150Read source →9Salhotra P, Verma R · 2017Determination of heavy metals contamination in some vegetables and fruits samples from the market of Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh StateIOSR Journal of Applied ChemistryRead source →

Comparison methods and scope

Each row is one statistic a source reports for one form of melon, group and metal; percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Different forms and preparation states are kept apart, and dry-weight results never share a reference with as-sold or fresh-weight results. Ratings place a result against an HMI reference built from monitoring results and ordinary-setting medians for the same form and basis. Same-study contrasts compare a contaminated or treated site with its control, targeted with random sampling, a prepared form with the unprocessed one, or one group of a study with the median of its other groups. Held rows failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.

About this table
Food formCollection scopeFindingComparisonEvidence
Melon findings from monitoring programmes, total diet studies and every extracted field, market and contaminated-site study, in µg/kg with each source’s form, basis, statistic and censoring retained.
Food formCollection scopeFinding (µg/kg)ComparisonEvidence
33 findings · 11 studies
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2019As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2000As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2007–2008As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2003–2010As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2008As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2004As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2000–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2011–2016As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2012–2014As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2007–2011As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998–2000As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / freshmean.
Melon, as soldCherfi et al. 2014Boumerdes wholesale markets2012Dry weightmean.
Melon, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012all samples2010Dry weightmean.
Melon, as soldIyabo et al. 2015legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Melon, as soldMehari et al. 2015Greensboro grocery store, single productCollection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Melon, as soldMehari et al. 2015Greensboro grocery store, single productCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Melon, as soldNisa et al. 2020local market2019Dry weightsample value.
Melon, as soldOrisakwe et al. 2012all samples (Ohaji, Umuagwo, Owerri sites)Collection date unreportedDry weightnot detected.
Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Klang farm 1 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Klang farm 2 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 1 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 2 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 3 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015mean of the five locationsCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015mean of the five locations, with +/- as printed in Table 3Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015range across the five location means (highest)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmax.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015range across the five location means (lowest)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmin.
Melon, as soldSalhotra et al. 2017all samples (market, Jagdalpur)2017Basis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Melon, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020local market2019Dry weightsample value.
1 finding · 1 study
Melon, oilIbanga et al. 2019manually extracted at laboratory from seeds bought at MondayCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
21 findings · 10 studies · 2 spread figures folded in
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2003–2019As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2000As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2007–2008As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO1999–2018As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2003–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2015–2016As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998–2000As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldDearing et al. 2025genus Cucumis2024As sold / freshmedian.Same samples: 4 µg/kg (maximum)
Melon, as soldDearing et al. 2025genus Momordica2024As sold / freshmedian.Same samples: 0.5 µg/kg (maximum)
Melon, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / freshmean.
Melon, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012all samples2010Dry weightmean.
Melon, as soldIyabo et al. 2015legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Melon, as soldNisa et al. 2020local market2019Dry weightsample value.
Melon, as soldOrisakwe et al. 2012all samples (Ohaji, Umuagwo, Owerri sites)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldSalhotra et al. 2017all samples (market, Jagdalpur)2017Basis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Melon, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020local market2019Dry weightsample value.
7 findings · 1 study
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2021As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2006–2023As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2000As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2008As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2007–2008As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2009As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998–2000As sold / freshmedian.
5 findings · 3 studies
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not statedmean.
7 findings · 2 studies
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2005–2016As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2000As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2016–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2007–2008As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldDabeka et al. 2003Ottawa composite (retail Oct-Nov 2000)1998–2000As sold / freshsample value.
Melon, as soldDabeka et al. 2003Whitehorse composite (retail Jan-Feb 1998)1998–2000As sold / freshnot detected.
15 findings · 8 studies · 2 spread figures folded in
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2000As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldDearing et al. 2025genus Cucumis2024As sold / freshmedian.Same samples: 94 µg/kg (maximum)
Melon, as soldDearing et al. 2025genus Momordica2024As sold / freshmedian.Same samples: 57 µg/kg (maximum)
Melon, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / freshmean.
Melon, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012all samples2010Dry weightmean.
Melon, as soldNisa et al. 2020local market2019Dry weightsample value.
Melon, as soldOrisakwe et al. 2012all samples (Ohaji, Umuagwo, Owerri sites)Collection date unreportedDry weightmean.
Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Klang farm 1 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Klang farm 2 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 1 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 2 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 3 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015mean of the five locationsCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Melon, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020local market2019Dry weightsample value.
9 findings · 4 studies
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2000As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / freshmean.
Melon, as soldCherfi et al. 2014Boumerdes wholesale markets2012Dry weightmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Klang farm 1 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Klang farm 2 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 1 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 2 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 3 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015mean of the five locationsCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
12 findings · 3 studies
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2000As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2007–2008As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Klang farm 1 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Klang farm 2 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 1 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 2 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 3 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015mean of the five locationsCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015mean of the five locations, with +/- as printed in Table 3Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015range across the five location means (lowest)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmin.
6 findings · 2 studies
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEURO2007–2008As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO1998As sold / freshmedian.
Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
2 findings · 1 study
Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
10 findings · 5 studies
Melon, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / freshmean.
Melon, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012all samples2010Dry weightmean.
Melon, as soldNisa et al. 2020local market2019Dry weightsample value.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Klang farm 1 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Klang farm 2 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 1 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 2 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 3 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015mean of the five locationsCollection date unreportedBasis not statednot detected.
Melon, as soldSalhotra et al. 2017all samples (market, Jagdalpur)2017Basis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Melon, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020local market2019Dry weightsample value.
14 findings · 6 studies
Melon, as soldCherfi et al. 2014Boumerdes wholesale markets2012Dry weightmean.
Melon, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012all samples2010Dry weightmean.
Melon, as soldIyabo et al. 2015legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Melon, as soldNisa et al. 2020local market2019Dry weightsample value.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Klang farm 1 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Klang farm 2 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 1 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 2 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 3 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015mean of the five locationsCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015mean of the five locations, with +/- as printed in Table 3Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015range across the five location means (highest)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmax.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015range across the five location means (lowest)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmin.
Melon, as soldSalhotra et al. 2017all samples (market, Jagdalpur)2017Basis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Melon, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020local market2019Dry weightsample value.
1 finding · 1 study
Melon, oilIbanga et al. 2019manually extracted at laboratory from seeds bought at MondayCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
11 findings · 3 studies
Melon, as soldNisa et al. 2020local market2019Dry weightsample value.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Klang farm 1 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Klang farm 2 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 1 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 2 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 3 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015mean of the five locationsCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015mean of the five locations, with +/- as printed in Table 3Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015range across the five location means (highest)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmax.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015range across the five location means (lowest)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmin.
Melon, as soldSalhotra et al. 2017all samples (market, Jagdalpur)2017Basis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Melon, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020local market2019Dry weightsample value.
1 finding · 1 study
Melon, oilIbanga et al. 2019manually extracted at laboratory from seeds bought at MondayCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
7 findings · 2 studies
Melon, as soldNisa et al. 2020local market2019Dry weightsample value.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Klang farm 1 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Klang farm 2 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 1 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 2 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 3 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015mean of the five locationsCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Melon, peel or outer layerNisa et al. 2020local market2019Dry weightsample value.
10 findings · 5 studies
Melon, as soldCherfi et al. 2014Boumerdes wholesale markets2012Dry weightmean.
Melon, as soldElbagermi et al. 2012all samples2010Dry weightmean.
Melon, as soldIyabo et al. 2015legume group itemCollection date unreportedDry weightsample value.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Klang farm 1 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Klang farm 2 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 1 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 2 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 3 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015mean of the five locationsCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldSalhotra et al. 2017all samples (market, Jagdalpur)2017Basis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Melon, oilIbanga et al. 2019manually extracted at laboratory from seeds bought at MondayCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
Melon, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
6 findings · 1 study
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Klang farm 1 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Klang farm 2 (Jalan Kebun, Klang)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 1 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 2 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015Mantin farm 3 (Negeri Sembilan)Collection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Melon, as soldRashid et al. 2015mean of the five locationsCollection date unreportedBasis not statedmean.
Shared dataset methods and interpretation

Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.

HMI melon Pb reference · Melon, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI melon Pb reference · Melon, as sold. Melon, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤3≤51.65–10 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤3≤51.4–9.5 (bounded)

67 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food67100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-2934994822fb:a5c5841ef5dc

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon Pb reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI melon Pb reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight. Melon, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference1006784100
Alternative weighting1006784100

3 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Iyabo et al. 2015133%
Mehari et al. 2015133%
Nisa et al. 2020133%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-110bcf83b2a5:c3948df7a0cd

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon Pb reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI melon Pb reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Melon, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference275275275
Alternative weighting275275275

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-ad9a3c55ec24:707e8ed826c6

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon Cd reference · Melon, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI melon Cd reference · Melon, as sold. Melon, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference0.5–0.75 (bounded)16–6.5 (bounded)
Alternative weighting0.5–0.75 (bounded)15.95–6.01 (bounded)

65 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food6350%
Dearing et al. 2025250%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-825459250efc:08a4a8cd185a

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon Cd reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI melon Cd reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight. Melon, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference1055.8102
Alternative weighting1055.8102

2 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Iyabo et al. 2015150%
Nisa et al. 2020150%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-75ea530550f6:519ace3297d2

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon Cd reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI melon Cd reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Melon, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference125125125
Alternative weighting125125125

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-5a8680f772a9:aac02b041b24

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon tAs reference · Melon, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI melon tAs reference · Melon, as sold. Melon, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤9.7≤13.913.9–24.1 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤9.63≤13.96.55–29.5 (bounded)

19 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food19100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-b427c590ae56:b5bf25e5453f

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon iAs reference · Melon, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI melon iAs reference · Melon, as sold. Melon, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference2.5–4 (bounded)67.5
Alternative weighting2.5–4 (bounded)67.5

4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food4100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-5456aba90122:bebdda970735

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon tHg reference · Melon, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI melon tHg reference · Melon, as sold. Melon, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤0.0540.0125–0.07 (bounded)0.07–1.09 (bounded)
Alternative weighting≤0.0540.025–0.07 (bounded)0.07–0.85 (bounded)

16 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food1450%
Dabeka et al. 2003250%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-1be86dbd277d:d2dc5eeb1269

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon Ni reference · Melon, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI melon Ni reference · Melon, as sold. Melon, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference576267
Alternative weighting576267

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Dearing et al. 20252100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Dearing et al. 2025 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-f8d4f07f350d:bb9695c7eef8

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon Ni reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI melon Ni reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight. Melon, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference193193193
Alternative weighting193193193

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-2325c0f659e9:590c45862273

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon Ni reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI melon Ni reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Melon, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference161161161
Alternative weighting161161161

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-17ba7cd7f091:bd37d4b73319

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon Al reference · Melon, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI melon Al reference · Melon, as sold. Melon, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤236620–738 (bounded)1240
Alternative weighting≤236620–738 (bounded)1240

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food2100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-86ae7ed3c732:6478b283d507

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon Sn reference · Melon, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI melon Sn reference · Melon, as sold. Melon, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤5.47≤10≤10
Alternative weighting≤3.48≤7.732.73–10 (bounded)

6 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food6100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-6cda66646ced:154dbe4d3dbb

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon Co reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI melon Co reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight. Melon, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference353353353
Alternative weighting353353353

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-76f9369a3138:47a4b1faf71c

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon Co reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI melon Co reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Melon, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference438438438
Alternative weighting438438438

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-62120885626a:1fae036ffbf1

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon Cu reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI melon Cu reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight. Melon, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference30613202340
Alternative weighting30613202340

2 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Iyabo et al. 2015150%
Nisa et al. 2020150%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-cca1972f72c6:7e0d3e432cb0

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon Cu reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI melon Cu reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Melon, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference574574574
Alternative weighting574574574

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-d11e3998b6f8:a9c5aad0b095

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon Fe reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI melon Fe reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight. Melon, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference313031303130
Alternative weighting313031303130

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-fda5bfd2e755:f9442f76de03

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon Fe reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI melon Fe reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Melon, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference309030903090
Alternative weighting309030903090

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-e124914336ed:9b71c3ff6be5

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon Mn reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI melon Mn reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight. Melon, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference472472472
Alternative weighting472472472

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-8fa364240dea:5aa8ce070223

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon Mn reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI melon Mn reference · Melon, peel or outer layer, dry weight. Melon, peel or outer layer; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference639639639
Alternative weighting639639639

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Nisa et al. 20201100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, peel or outer layer on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Nisa et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, peel or outer layer on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-b304c04226e4:92b4e81a123f

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI melon Zn reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI melon Zn reference · Melon, as sold, dry weight. Melon, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference189001890018900
Alternative weighting189001890018900

1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Iyabo et al. 20151100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for melon, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Iyabo et al. 2015 is the only compatible sampling family for melon, as sold on this basis in the completed melon ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:melon-40917b44f592:c017282e939f

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

1 dataset

How metals reach melon

No study in the library compared melon from contaminated and ordinary settings, so the routes by which metals reach it are not measured here.

Which forms and regions measured lower

The HMI reference for lead in melon, as sold pools 67 subgroup units from 1 sampling family, with a median of below 5 µg/kg and a middle half spanning below 3 (lower quartile) and between 1.65 and 10 µg/kg (upper quartile).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium in melon, as sold, the reference median was 1 µg/kg, with a middle half from between 0.5 and 0.75 to between 6 and 6.5 µg/kg across 65 units.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →8Dearing C, Ye Z, Robertshaw G · 2025Assessment of Heavy Metals in Organic and Non-Organic Vegetables Post Severe Tropical Cyclone Gabrielle: A cross-sectional comparative analysisF1000ResearchRead source → For total arsenic in melon, as sold, the reference median was below 13.9 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 9.7 to between 13.9 and 24.1 µg/kg across 19 units.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, melon, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (1.3 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (12 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in WPRO (3.5 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (11.7 µg/kg).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For total arsenic, the lowest regional median was in EURO (16.4 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (19 µg/kg).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

Processing, cooking and preparation

Processed or prepared forms were compared only with unprocessed melon in the same study and group. Melon, peel or outer layer (local market) had lead lower at 275 µg/kg, against 678 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (melon, as sold).10Nisa KU, Samiullah, Khan N, Attiq-ur-Rehman · 2020Detection of Heavy metals in Fruits and Vegetables available in the Market of Quetta cityAl-Nahrain Journal of Science 23(1):47-56Read source →

Forms differ in water content, so a per-kilogram difference is not by itself a measured removal or gain of metal.

Mitigation for melon

Lot testing against the applicable limit is the check that can be verified.

No measured way to lower metals in this food is in the library yet.

Trade-offs and limits of controls

Metals do not move together, so a lot that passes a lead limit says little about cadmium, arsenic or nickel unless those are tested as well.

Testing melon for metals

Results depend on the method and its reporting limit. Reporting limits for lead ranged from 2 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 3,000 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Reporting limits for cadmium ranged from 0.5 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 50 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → Reporting limits for total arsenic ranged from 2 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 300 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

A useful lot result names the form, the basis and a quantification limit well below the limit that applies.

Buying and verifying melon

No maximum level for metals in melon was verified from primary text for this page; buyers should confirm the limit that applies in the destination market.

Exposure from melon

No source in the library converted melon concentrations into a verified estimate of intake for a defined population. Concentrations describe the food, not individual risk.

Evidence review and remaining gaps

Every source record that names melon was decided on its content: 17 occurrence extracted, 17 records in all. The occurrence table renders every extracted result; held values remain visible with their reason.

References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.

Melon FAQs

What heavy metals are found in melon?

The library reports lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V and B in melon, most often lead, cadmium and total arsenic.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Guerra F, Trevizam AR, Muraoka T, Marcante NC, Canniatti-Brazaca SG · 2012Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →3Cherfi A, Abdoun S, Gaci O · 2014Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in AlgeriaFood and Chemical ToxicologyRead source →4Elbagermi MA, Edwards HGM, Alajtal AI · 2012Monitoring of Heavy Metal Content in Fruits and Vegetables Collected from Production and Market Sites in the Misurata Area of LibyaISRN Analytical ChemistryRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in melon, as sold from 536 results in 4 reporting regions, with subgroup medians from 1.3 to 12 µg/kg.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

Which regions report the lowest levels in melon?

Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, melon, as sold had the lowest lead subgroup median in PAHO (1.3 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (12 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, the lowest regional median was in WPRO (3.5 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (11.7 µg/kg).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

Does processing change heavy metals in melon?

Only comparisons between forms in the same study are available, not before-and-after measurements of the same melon.10Nisa KU, Samiullah, Khan N, Attiq-ur-Rehman · 2020Detection of Heavy metals in Fruits and Vegetables available in the Market of Quetta cityAl-Nahrain Journal of Science 23(1):47-56Read source → Melon, peel or outer layer (local market) had lead lower at 275 µg/kg, against 678 µg/kg for the unprocessed form in the same group (melon, as sold).10Nisa KU, Samiullah, Khan N, Attiq-ur-Rehman · 2020Detection of Heavy metals in Fruits and Vegetables available in the Market of Quetta cityAl-Nahrain Journal of Science 23(1):47-56Read source →

How much of the arsenic in melon is inorganic?

Inorganic arsenic, the more toxic form, was measured in 5 results from 3 sources, far fewer than total arsenic.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →11Centre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR · 2012The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →12European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) · 2014Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597Read source → Across 2 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported inorganic arsenic means and medians with the basis not stated ranged from 4 µg/kg (Centre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012) to 6.3 µg/kg (European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014).11Centre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR · 2012The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source →12European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) · 2014Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597Read source →

References

Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.

  1. GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsWorld Health Organization · GEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment Programme · 2026 · extranet.who.intDataset
  2. Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthGuerra F, Trevizam AR, Muraoka T, Marcante NC, and Canniatti-Brazaca SG · Scientia Agricola 69(1):54-60 · 2012 · doi.org/10.1590/s0103-90162012000100008Peer-reviewed
  3. Food survey: Levels and potential health risks of chromium, lead, zinc and copper content in fruits and vegetables consumed in AlgeriaCherfi A, Abdoun S, and Gaci O · Food and Chemical Toxicology · 2014 · doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2014.04.044Peer-reviewed
  4. Monitoring of Heavy Metal Content in Fruits and Vegetables Collected from Production and Market Sites in the Misurata Area of LibyaElbagermi MA, Edwards HGM, and Alajtal AI · ISRN Analytical Chemistry · 2012 · doi.org/10.5402/2012/827645Peer-reviewed
  5. Toxic and Essential Metals in Staple Foods Commonly Consumed by Students in Ekiti State, South West, NigeriaIyabo OO, Ogundiran MB, and Adebayo OL · International Journal of Chemistry · 2015 · doi.org/10.5539/ijc.v7n1p155Peer-reviewed
  6. Trace and Macro Elements Concentrations in Selected Fresh Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs, and Processed Foods in North Carolina, USAMehari TF, Greene L, Duncan AL, and Fakayode SO · Journal of Environmental Protection, 2015, 6, 573-583 · 2015 · doi.org/10.4236/jep.2015.66052Peer-reviewed
  7. Studies on chemical elements and anti-nutrients compositions of three traditional vegetable oils in NigeriaIbanga UI, Fakunle JO, Raji AO, and Sogunle KA · Journal of Agricultural Science and Practice 4(5), 144-150 · 2019 · doi.org/10.31248/jasp2019.155Peer-reviewed
  8. Assessment of Heavy Metals in Organic and Non-Organic Vegetables Post Severe Tropical Cyclone Gabrielle: A cross-sectional comparative analysisDearing C, Ye Z, and Robertshaw G · F1000Research · 2025 · doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.175538.1Peer-reviewed
  9. Determination of heavy metals contamination in some vegetables and fruits samples from the market of Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh StateSalhotra P and Verma R · IOSR Journal of Applied Chemistry · 2017 · doi.org/10.9790/5736-100502110113Peer-reviewed
  10. Detection of Heavy metals in Fruits and Vegetables available in the Market of Quetta cityNisa KU, Samiullah, Khan N, and Attiq-ur-Rehman · Al-Nahrain Journal of Science 23(1):47-56 · 2020 · doi.org/10.22401/anjs.23.1.07Peer-reviewed
  11. The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR · Centre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region · 2012 · www.cfs.gov.hkGovernment
  12. Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) · EFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597 · 2014 · doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3597Government

Sources

Browse Melon Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.

Update history

22 October 2026: Rebuilt from every melon record in the library: 17 occurrence sources, references by form and basis, same-study contrasts.