Cantaloupe

Overview

This ingredient stub was created during the FDA FY2018-FY2020 Total Diet Study element-results ingest so future source ingests have a stable destination for this food matrix. FDA reports this item as TDS Food 89, “Cantaloupe, raw/frozen.” FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical Results

Why this commodity accumulates heavy metals

Cantaloupe (Cucumis melo) is a cucurbit fruit with one of the lowest heavy metal accumulation profiles among common food crops. The edible interior flesh is protected by a thick, netted outer rind that physically separates it from direct soil contact, and the plant does not prioritize metal translocation to fruit tissue in the way that leafy vegetables or root crops do. Lead uptake from soil into melon flesh is limited both by physical rind protection and by the low phloem mobility of Pb, which restricts translocation from roots to developing fruit. Cadmium uptake is higher in cucurbits than lead, but cantaloupe flesh still shows Cd well below levels typical of brassica vegetables or root crops in the same soil. The FDA FY2018-FY2020 Total Diet Study confirms this low-accumulation pattern, with Pb, Cr, tHg, and U at or below the reporting limit, and Cd in the single-digit to low-teen ppb range FDA 2022. Nickel and total arsenic are detectable but at modest concentrations. Cantaloupe is not a canned product in the TDS food assessed (TDS Food 89 is raw/frozen), so tin migration from packaging is not a factor for this commodity.

Heavy metal contamination profile

Per-analyte snapshot derived from the machine-readable contamination_profile in the frontmatter above. data gap indicates the literature has been reviewed for this commodity-analyte combination and no usable occurrence data was found (a finding, not a placeholder). The Key sources column shows the top 2-3 contributing sources by year and sample size, with numbered wikilink aliases.

FDA TDS FY2018-FY2020 Evidence

The normalized row-level data for this TDS food is stored in data/evidence/fda_tds_fy2018_2020_element_results_samples.csv, with per-food/per-analyte summaries in data/evidence/fda_tds_fy2018_2020_summary_by_food_analyte.csv. Concentrations are retained as FDA reported them, with the reporting-limit column preserved separately; reported zeroes are not rewritten as <LOD unless a source explicitly says to do so. FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical Results

Routing

This node is linked from the ingredient index and the FDA TDS source routing table.

Contamination Profile State

Per-analyte state — populated, in progress, or declared data gap — is carried authoritatively in the machine-readable contamination_profile frontmatter and the contamination-profile table above. Ingredient-level values belong here; finished-product values belong on the relevant product-category page.

FDA TDS FY2018-FY2020 Occurrence Values

FDA Total Diet Study FY2018-FY2020 reports prepared/composite-food concentration distributions for this ingredient as TDS food “Cantaloupe, raw/frozen” (FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical Results). Values are in ppb-equivalent on the basis FDA reported. The full sample-level data are stored in data/evidence/fda_tds_fy2018_2020_element_results_samples.csv; per-analyte distributions in data/evidence/fda_tds_fy2018_2020_summary_by_food_analyte.csv. These distributions count as one source under Persistent Wiki Ingest Rule synthesis discipline; numerical values stay in body scratch until a second independent source is integrated.

Ranges by source, region, and variety

The FDA FY2018-FY2020 Total Diet Study reports Cd in cantaloupe (raw/frozen) in the range of 0 to 36 ppb (median 7.1 ppb, n=27 composites) FDA 2022. Nickel ranged from 0 to 270 ppb (median 75 ppb), which is unexpectedly high relative to other low-accumulation fruits and may warrant confirmation with independent sources. Total arsenic ranged from 0 to 26 ppb (median 7 ppb). Pb, Cr, tHg, and U were at or below the reporting limit across 27 composites. The Ni values are the most notable finding in the TDS data for this commodity; the corpus currently does not include independent studies to confirm or contextualize the cantaloupe Ni range. Geographic variation is expected to be minimal given the physical protection afforded by the rind; regional soil quality differences that substantially affect root or leafy vegetables have a smaller impact on cucurbit flesh.

Processing effects

Cantaloupe consumed as fresh or frozen halves or cubes does not involve processing that would alter metal concentrations in the flesh. Washing the outer rind before cutting is a food safety practice (to prevent cross-contamination from the rind surface to the flesh during slicing) that does not directly reduce intrinsic metal content in the flesh. Cantaloupe pureed for smoothies, baby food, or juice processing carries whatever metal load is in the flesh into the final product at concentration determined by the flesh-to-water ratio. Frozen cantaloupe undergoes minimal processing (peeling, cutting, individual quick freezing) that does not alter metal concentrations.

Ingredient-derivative risk

Cantaloupe is used in fruit salads, smoothies, baby food purees, juices, and dried snack products. Given its very low intrinsic metal load for most analytes, it contributes minimally to product-level metal concentrations even at high inclusion rates. Dried cantaloupe concentrates metals proportionally to moisture loss; a product dried to 10 percent of original moisture would carry approximately 10 times the fresh-weight concentration, but from a very low baseline this remains well within regulatory limits for most analytes. The notable exception to the low-risk profile is the Ni range observed in TDS data (up to 270 ppb), which if confirmed by additional sources would warrant inclusion in product-level Ni exposure estimates for formulations using cantaloupe at high inclusion rates.

Mitigation options

Sourcing levers

Standard clean-soil agricultural sourcing is sufficient for most analytes given the low accumulation baseline. If the Ni values observed in TDS data are confirmed by additional surveys as consistently elevated, sourcing from lower-Ni-soil origins would become relevant. Irrigation water quality monitoring (particularly for Cd) provides upstream assurance.

Agronomic levers

No quantified data on this lever in the current corpus; section will be expanded when relevant evidence is ingested. Soil pH management and avoidance of contaminated irrigation water are general best practices applicable here as for other cucurbit crops.

Processing levers

No processing steps are available to meaningfully reduce the intrinsic metal content of cantaloupe flesh. Washing the exterior rind before slicing prevents surface contamination of the flesh; this is standard practice.

Formulation levers

No quantified data on this lever in the current corpus; section will be expanded when relevant evidence is ingested. Given the low baseline, formulation substitution is not indicated on metal-safety grounds for most analytes.

Testing and QC levers

Routine heavy metal testing of cantaloupe is low priority given the consistently low values in TDS data for most analytes. If the Ni range is confirmed as elevated in additional studies, Ni verification on incoming lots would become relevant for products targeting sensitive populations.

Packaging and storage levers

Packaging and storage conditions are not a material driver of heavy metal load in fresh, frozen, or pureed cantaloupe. No tin migration pathway applies to this commodity in its primary form.

Regulatory limits that apply

The EU EU Regulation 2023/915 maximum levels for contaminants in food sets a maximum level for Pb in fruit of 0.10 mg/kg (100 ppb) wet weight and for Cd in fruit of 0.050 mg/kg (50 ppb) wet weight. Cantaloupe falls under these general fruit limits. The Codex Alimentarius Codex Alimentarius — Maximum Levels for Cadmium in Food sets analogous Cd limits for fruit. No specific FDA action levels for cantaloupe are currently operative. Under FDA Closer to Zero FDA Closer to Zero — Program Overview, any cantaloupe puree marketed as a food for young children would fall within the scope of Pb action levels under development for fruit-based baby foods.

References

Works cited in this page’s text, in first-appearance order. This is not the full corpus for this page; it is only what the prose above draws on. The complete set of sources is listed under Sources below. Each title links to its source record, which carries the ingest receipt, the extracted values, and the file hash of the document it was built from.

1. FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsU.S. Food and Drug Administration · FDA Total Diet Study · 2022 · www.fda.govDataset

Sources

Auto-generated from source-page frontmatter. The "Used on this page for" column is populated by the orchestrator's POPULATE-SOURCE-LEGEND action; pending entries appear as *[awaiting synthesis]*.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.