Algae in the HMI library has 221 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, monomethylarsonic acid, total mercury, methylmercury, chromium, aluminium, arsenosugar (glycerol sugar), arsenosugar (phosphate sugar), arsenosugar (sulfate sugar), arsenosugar (sulfonate sugar), As(III), As(V), AsB, I, TETRA, TMAO and water-extractable As from 14 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Dietary exposure to heavy metals and iodine intake via consumption of seaweeds and halophytes in the European populationEFSA JournalRead source →3Results of the BfR MEAL Study: In Germany, mercury is mostly contained in fish and seafood while cadmium, lead, and nickel are present in a broad spectrum of foodsFood Chemistry: XRead source →4Scientific Opinion on Lead in FoodEFSA Journal 2010;8(4):1570Read source →5Risk Assessment and Determination of Arsenic and Heavy Metals in Fishery Products in KoreaFoodsRead source →6Dietary Lead Exposure and Associated Health Risks in Guangzhou, ChinaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthRead source →
-
Metals measured:
Lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid and monomethylarsonic acid and others, in 221 results from 14 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Dietary exposure to heavy metals and iodine intake via consumption of seaweeds and halophytes in the European populationEFSA JournalRead source →3Results of the BfR MEAL Study: In Germany, mercury is mostly contained in fish and seafood while cadmium, lead, and nickel are present in a broad spectrum of foodsFood Chemistry: XRead source →4Scientific Opinion on Lead in FoodEFSA Journal 2010;8(4):1570Read source →
-
Main drivers:
Form, basis and where the algae was sampled; reporting limits decide how many results are non-detects.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Dietary exposure to heavy metals and iodine intake via consumption of seaweeds and halophytes in the European populationEFSA JournalRead source →3Results of the BfR MEAL Study: In Germany, mercury is mostly contained in fish and seafood while cadmium, lead, and nickel are present in a broad spectrum of foodsFood Chemistry: XRead source →4Scientific Opinion on Lead in FoodEFSA Journal 2010;8(4):1570Read source →
-
Practical framing:
Ask for lot results with a quantification limit well below the limit that applies in the destination market.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Dietary exposure to heavy metals and iodine intake via consumption of seaweeds and halophytes in the European populationEFSA JournalRead source →3Results of the BfR MEAL Study: In Germany, mercury is mostly contained in fish and seafood while cadmium, lead, and nickel are present in a broad spectrum of foodsFood Chemistry: XRead source →4Scientific Opinion on Lead in FoodEFSA Journal 2010;8(4):1570Read source →
Algae overview
Algae in the HMI library has 221 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, monomethylarsonic acid, total mercury, methylmercury, chromium, aluminium, arsenosugar (glycerol sugar), arsenosugar (phosphate sugar), arsenosugar (sulfate sugar), arsenosugar (sulfonate sugar), As(III), As(V), AsB, I, TETRA, TMAO and water-extractable As from 14 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Dietary exposure to heavy metals and iodine intake via consumption of seaweeds and halophytes in the European populationEFSA JournalRead source →3Results of the BfR MEAL Study: In Germany, mercury is mostly contained in fish and seafood while cadmium, lead, and nickel are present in a broad spectrum of foodsFood Chemistry: XRead source →4Scientific Opinion on Lead in FoodEFSA Journal 2010;8(4):1570Read source →5Risk Assessment and Determination of Arsenic and Heavy Metals in Fishery Products in KoreaFoodsRead source →6Dietary Lead Exposure and Associated Health Risks in Guangzhou, ChinaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in algae, as sold from 18 results in 2 reporting regions, with subgroup medians below 50 µg/kg, mostly non-detects.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For cadmium, GEMS/Food gave a subgroup median of 40 µg/kg from 17 results.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Across 2 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported lead means and medians on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis ranged from 55 µg/kg (Fechner et al. 2022) to 890 µg/kg (European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023).2Dietary exposure to heavy metals and iodine intake via consumption of seaweeds and halophytes in the European populationEFSA JournalRead source →3Results of the BfR MEAL Study: In Germany, mercury is mostly contained in fish and seafood while cadmium, lead, and nickel are present in a broad spectrum of foodsFood Chemistry: XRead source → For cadmium, 2 studies on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis reported means and medians from 109 µg/kg (European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023) to 1,090 µg/kg (European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023).2Dietary exposure to heavy metals and iodine intake via consumption of seaweeds and halophytes in the European populationEFSA JournalRead source →
For a buyer the practical points are the form bought, the basis a result is reported on, where the algae came from and the laboratory’s reporting limit. Testing finds contamination but does not remove it.
What counts as algae
This page covers algae in 4 forms kept separate in every comparison: algae, as sold (113 results), algae, dried (80 results), algae, powder or ground (27 results) and algae, flour or meal (1 result).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Dietary exposure to heavy metals and iodine intake via consumption of seaweeds and halophytes in the European populationEFSA JournalRead source →3Results of the BfR MEAL Study: In Germany, mercury is mostly contained in fish and seafood while cadmium, lead, and nickel are present in a broad spectrum of foodsFood Chemistry: XRead source →4Scientific Opinion on Lead in FoodEFSA Journal 2010;8(4):1570Read source →5Risk Assessment and Determination of Arsenic and Heavy Metals in Fishery Products in KoreaFoodsRead source →6Dietary Lead Exposure and Associated Health Risks in Guangzhou, ChinaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthRead source →
Results stay on the basis each source reports: as sold or fresh weight, dry weight, or unstated. Dry-weight, as-sold and unstated results are never pooled, and no moisture conversion is applied.
Heavy metal contamination profile of algae
The table holds every extracted algae result: one row for each statistic a source reports for a form, group and metal, 221 rows in all, grouped by metal and form; percentiles, ranges and maxima for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Dietary exposure to heavy metals and iodine intake via consumption of seaweeds and halophytes in the European populationEFSA JournalRead source →3Results of the BfR MEAL Study: In Germany, mercury is mostly contained in fish and seafood while cadmium, lead, and nickel are present in a broad spectrum of foodsFood Chemistry: XRead source →4Scientific Opinion on Lead in FoodEFSA Journal 2010;8(4):1570Read source →5Risk Assessment and Determination of Arsenic and Heavy Metals in Fishery Products in KoreaFoodsRead source →6Dietary Lead Exposure and Associated Health Risks in Guangzhou, ChinaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthRead source → Monitoring medians are HMI calculations from individual submissions; non-detects remain intervals between zero and the reporting limit and are never read as zero.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
99 rows can be rated against an HMI reference for the same form and basis, 0 rows have a direct same-study comparison, and the rest stay unrated with the reason recorded. 1 value from 1 source failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.7Dietary Exposure of the Taiwan Population to Mercury Content in Various Seafood Assessed by a Total Diet StudyInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthRead source →
Comparison methods and scope
Each row is one statistic a source reports for one form of algae, group and metal; percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Different forms and preparation states are kept apart, and dry-weight results never share a reference with as-sold or fresh-weight results. Ratings place a result against an HMI reference built from monitoring results and ordinary-setting medians for the same form and basis. Same-study contrasts compare a contaminated or treated site with its control, targeted with random sampling, a prepared form with the unprocessed one, or one group of a study with the median of its other groups. Held rows failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.
First displayed analyte: Lead: 51 findings from 7 sources. Each row retains its statistic and measurement basis.
Filter findings
202 of 202 findings · 21 analytes
About this table
| Food form | Collection scope | Finding (µg/kg) | Comparison | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
27 findings · 6 studies · 13 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | EU occurrence data2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | EU occurrence data2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | EU occurrence data2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | EU occurrence data2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldFechner et al. 2022 | all samples (Germany, national)2017–2019As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2015 | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | max. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | max. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | max. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 0 µg/kg (percentile); 1,100 µg/kg (percentile); 4,190 µg/kg (percentile); 1,700 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 14 µg/kg (percentile); 1,100 µg/kg (percentile); 41 µg/kg (percentile); 4,190 µg/kg (percentile); 10 µg/kg (percentile); 1,700 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2010 | Miscellaneous products and products for special dietary use2000–2009Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Algae, as soldKim et al. 2023 | all samples in category2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldKim et al. 2023 | Sea algae (n = 105)2021Basis not stated | min. | ||
| Algae, as soldKim et al. 2023 | Sea algae (n = 105)2021Basis not stated | max. | ||
| Algae, as soldWang et al. 2019 | all samples (Guangzhou, 2014-2017)2014–2017Basis not stated | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldWang et al. 2019 | all samples (Guangzhou, 2014-2017)2014–2017Basis not stated | mean.Same samples: 894 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Algae, as soldWang et al. 2019 | all samples (Guangzhou, 2014-2017)2014–2017Basis not stated | percentile. | ||
11 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | all 18 productsCollection date unreported | range. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 1Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 2Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 3Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 4Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 5Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 6Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 7Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 8Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 9Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 18Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
9 findings · 4 studies | ||||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | EU occurrence data2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | EU occurrence data2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | EU occurrence data2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | EU occurrence data2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldFechner et al. 2022 | all samples (Germany, national)2017–2019As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldKim et al. 2023 | all samples in category2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldKim et al. 2023 | Sea algae (n = 105)2021Basis not stated | min. | ||
| Algae, as soldKim et al. 2023 | Sea algae (n = 105)2021Basis not stated | max. | ||
16 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | all 18 productsCollection date unreported | range. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 1Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 2Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 3Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 4Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 5Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 6Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 7Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 8Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 9Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 10Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 11Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 12Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 13Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 14Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 18Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
25 findings · 5 studies · 6 spread figures folded in | ||||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2023As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2014–2023As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2014–2022As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2022–2023As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | EU occurrence data2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | EU occurrence data2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | EU occurrence data2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | EU occurrence data2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2016–2017 | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreported | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreported | mean.Same samples: 236,000 µg/kg (maximum); 116,000 µg/kg (maximum); 102,000 µg/kg (percentile); 116,000 µg/kg (percentile); 126,000 µg/kg (maximum); 4,370 µg/kg (percentile) | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreported | max. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreported | percentile. | ||
| Algae, as soldGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | all 12 algaeCollection date unreported | range. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | max. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | EFSA 2009 pooled European occurrence dataCollection date unreportedBasis not stated | percentile. | ||
| Algae, as soldKim et al. 2023 | all samples in category2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldKim et al. 2023 | Sea algae (n = 105)2021Basis not stated | min. | ||
| Algae, as soldKim et al. 2023 | Sea algae (n = 105)2021Basis not stated | max. | ||
17 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | all 18 productsCollection date unreported | range. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 1Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 2Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 3Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 4Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 5Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 6Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 7Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 8Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 9Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 10Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 11Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 12Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 13Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 14Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 18Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedDíaz et al. 2012 | All 14 species (range of species means)2003–2004 | range. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Fucus (Fucus vesiculosus), FranceCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Laminaria (Laminaria digitata), FranceCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, flour or mealEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | Algae as foodCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | sample value. | ||
13 findings · 3 studies | ||||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2014–2023As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2018–2022As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2022As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014–2021As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2020–2024As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2020–2024As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2015As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | EU occurrence data2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | EU occurrence data2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | EU occurrence data2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | EU occurrence data2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2014 | European dietary-survey occurrence data2003–2013Basis not stated | mean. | ||
17 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | all 18 productsCollection date unreported | range. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 1Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 2Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 3Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 4Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 5Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 6Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 7Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 8Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 9Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 10Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 11Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 12Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 13Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 14Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 18Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedDíaz et al. 2012 | All 14 species (range of species means)2003–2004 | range. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Fucus (Fucus vesiculosus), FranceCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Laminaria (Laminaria digitata), FranceCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
3 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2022–2023As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EURO2016 | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA CONTAM Panel 2024 | EU market, all samples in commodity2012–2022Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Fucus (Fucus vesiculosus), FranceCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Fucus (Fucus vesiculosus), FranceCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Laminaria (Laminaria digitata), FranceCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
10 findings · 4 studies | ||||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | EU occurrence data2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | EU occurrence data2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | EU occurrence data2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | EU occurrence data2011–2021As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Algae, as soldLin et al. 2021 | all samples, TaiwanCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldLin et al. 2021 | all samples, TaiwanCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldKim et al. 2023 | all samples in category2021Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldKim et al. 2023 | Sea algae (n = 105)2021Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
| Algae, as soldKim et al. 2023 | Sea algae (n = 105)2021Basis not stated | max. | ||
16 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | all 18 productsCollection date unreported | range. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 1Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 2Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 3Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 4Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 5Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 6Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 7Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 8Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 9Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 10Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 11Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 12Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 13Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 14Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, driedAlmela et al. 2002 | retail product 18Collection date unreported | sample value. | ||
3 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Algae, as soldLin et al. 2021 | all samples, TaiwanCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | range. | ||
| Algae, as soldLin et al. 2021 | all samples, TaiwanCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | range. | ||
| Algae, as soldKim et al. 2023 | all samples in category2021Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, LB2000–2013As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, as soldEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2014 | all samples, EFSA FoodEx subgroup, UB2000–2013As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2024As sold / fresh | median. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Fucus (Fucus vesiculosus), FranceCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Laminaria (Laminaria digitata), FranceCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Fucus (Fucus vesiculosus), FranceCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Laminaria (Laminaria digitata), FranceCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Fucus (Fucus vesiculosus), FranceCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Laminaria (Laminaria digitata), FranceCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Fucus (Fucus vesiculosus), FranceCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Laminaria (Laminaria digitata), FranceCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Fucus (Fucus vesiculosus), FranceCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Laminaria (Laminaria digitata), FranceCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Fucus (Fucus vesiculosus), FranceCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Laminaria (Laminaria digitata), FranceCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Fucus (Fucus vesiculosus), FranceCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Laminaria (Laminaria digitata), FranceCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, as soldEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | pooled fresh/unprocessed brown algae2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
3 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, driedEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | Brown algae, unspecified / Dried product2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, driedEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | pooled dried algae types2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Algae, driedEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 | pooled dried algae types2011–2021As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Fucus (Fucus vesiculosus), FranceCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Laminaria (Laminaria digitata), FranceCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Fucus (Fucus vesiculosus), FranceCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Laminaria (Laminaria digitata), FranceCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Fucus (Fucus vesiculosus), FranceCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Algae, powder or groundGarcía-Salgado et al. 2012 | Laminaria (Laminaria digitata), FranceCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
Shared dataset methods and interpretation
Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.
HMI algae Pb reference · Algae, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI algae Pb reference · Algae, as sold. Algae, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for algae, as sold on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-8a2c9cb95185:adad3edc2ee4
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae Pb reference · Algae, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae Pb reference · Algae, as sold, dry weight. Algae, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤15 | ≤15 | ≤15 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤15 | ≤15 | ≤15 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for algae, as sold on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-e331d2b7d11b:98bb7b45c401
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae Pb reference · Algae, dried, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae Pb reference · Algae, dried, dry weight. Algae, dried; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 190 | 300 | 930 |
| Alternative weighting | 190 | 300 | 930 |
10 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Almela et al. 2002 | 10 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, dried on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Almela et al. 2002 is the only compatible sampling family for algae, dried on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-2d021944b2d4:f542ddc13dbe
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae Cd reference · Algae, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI algae Cd reference · Algae, as sold. Algae, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 40 | 40 | 40 |
| Alternative weighting | 40 | 40 | 40 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for algae, as sold on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-e3517c703d1b:d0bd66cfd907
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae Cd reference · Algae, dried, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae Cd reference · Algae, dried, dry weight. Algae, dried; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 170 | 380 | 750 |
| Alternative weighting | 170 | 380 | 750 |
15 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Almela et al. 2002 | 15 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, dried on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Almela et al. 2002 is the only compatible sampling family for algae, dried on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-2e813469d58c:28f7bc92cc5b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae tAs reference · Algae, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI algae tAs reference · Algae, as sold. Algae, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 2950 | 9050 | 17300 |
| Alternative weighting | 6670 | 10900 | 20500 |
16 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 16 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for algae, as sold on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-fcf7f66ccca6:a0c40e8d4969
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae tAs reference · Algae, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae tAs reference · Algae, as sold, dry weight. Algae, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 13500 | 32200 | 43700 |
| Alternative weighting | 13500 | 32200 | 43700 |
4 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 50% |
| EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | 2 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-0d5cdfba4f60:7d3c508c86cf
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae tAs reference · Algae, dried, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae tAs reference · Algae, dried, dry weight. Algae, dried; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 23700 | 30000 | 42000 |
| Alternative weighting | 23700 | 30000 | 42000 |
15 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Almela et al. 2002 | 15 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, dried on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Almela et al. 2002 is the only compatible sampling family for algae, dried on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-49cf3e1f4c51:ed4735de6995
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae tAs reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae tAs reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight. Algae, powder or ground; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 47000 | 86500 | 126000 |
| Alternative weighting | 47000 | 86500 | 126000 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| García-Salgado et al. 2012 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, powder or ground on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
García-Salgado et al. 2012 is the only compatible sampling family for algae, powder or ground on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-c271aba27694:0c9bdc5a453d
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae tAs reference · Algae, flour or meal
Reference and scope
HMI algae tAs reference · Algae, flour or meal. Algae, flour or meal; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 236000 | 236000 | 236000 |
| Alternative weighting | 236000 | 236000 | 236000 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, flour or meal on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) 2009 is the only compatible sampling family for algae, flour or meal on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-9a2e86762c76:223d5c0434ec
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae iAs reference · Algae, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI algae iAs reference · Algae, as sold. Algae, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 17.5–70 (bounded) | 100–110 (bounded) | 186–200 (bounded) |
| Alternative weighting | 15.5–70 (bounded) | 85–110 (bounded) | 186–211 (bounded) |
27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 27 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for algae, as sold on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-19b1f31b2307:f413b9aee6b5
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae iAs reference · Algae, dried, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae iAs reference · Algae, dried, dry weight. Algae, dried; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 180 | 260 | 370 |
| Alternative weighting | 180 | 260 | 370 |
15 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Almela et al. 2002 | 15 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, dried on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Almela et al. 2002 is the only compatible sampling family for algae, dried on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-8b518fa6a958:d99950ac62dd
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae iAs reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae iAs reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight. Algae, powder or ground; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 11000 | 44000 | 77000 |
| Alternative weighting | 11000 | 44000 | 77000 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| García-Salgado et al. 2012 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, powder or ground on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
García-Salgado et al. 2012 is the only compatible sampling family for algae, powder or ground on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-743f864b826d:7208b2b1493c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae DMA reference · Algae, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI algae DMA reference · Algae, as sold. Algae, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 450 | 485 | 520 |
| Alternative weighting | 450 | 485 | 520 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for algae, as sold on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-01922cea89bf:d1aca9a2177c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae DMA reference · Algae, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae DMA reference · Algae, as sold, dry weight. Algae, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 684 | 684 | 684 |
| Alternative weighting | 684 | 684 | 684 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for algae, as sold on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-9834c5701519:cbcf21e0a698
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae DMA reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae DMA reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight. Algae, powder or ground; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 550 | 550 | 550 |
| Alternative weighting | 550 | 550 | 550 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| García-Salgado et al. 2012 | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, powder or ground on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
García-Salgado et al. 2012 is the only compatible sampling family for algae, powder or ground on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-78956e373425:778b42df727c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae MMA reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae MMA reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight. Algae, powder or ground; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤27 | ≤27 | ≤27 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤27 | ≤27 | ≤27 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| García-Salgado et al. 2012 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, powder or ground on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
García-Salgado et al. 2012 is the only compatible sampling family for algae, powder or ground on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-3f9f36f9659d:66027b0656d4
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae tHg reference · Algae, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI algae tHg reference · Algae, as sold. Algae, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for algae, as sold on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-f0b2a74eee79:0b45343d2685
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae tHg reference · Algae, dried, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae tHg reference · Algae, dried, dry weight. Algae, dried; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 12 | 20.6 | 33.6 |
| Alternative weighting | 12 | 20.6 | 33.6 |
15 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Almela et al. 2002 | 15 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, dried on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Almela et al. 2002 is the only compatible sampling family for algae, dried on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-e9b8262ada72:2cc3e586ad83
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae Al reference · Algae, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI algae Al reference · Algae, as sold. Algae, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 3700 | 3700 | 3700 |
| Alternative weighting | 3700 | 3700 | 3700 |
1 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 1 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for algae, as sold on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-1f8a0934a263:1b841b66bcea
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae arsenosugar (glycerol sugar) reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae arsenosugar (glycerol sugar) reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight. Algae, powder or ground; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 2600 | 6400 | 10200 |
| Alternative weighting | 2600 | 6400 | 10200 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| García-Salgado et al. 2012 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, powder or ground on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
García-Salgado et al. 2012 is the only compatible sampling family for algae, powder or ground on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-5ba5ca5ae5c6:9105cca49435
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae arsenosugar (phosphate sugar) reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae arsenosugar (phosphate sugar) reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight. Algae, powder or ground; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 800 | 2150 | 3500 |
| Alternative weighting | 800 | 2150 | 3500 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| García-Salgado et al. 2012 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, powder or ground on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
García-Salgado et al. 2012 is the only compatible sampling family for algae, powder or ground on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-47f63c8aecc6:43e521bf9d9e
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae arsenosugar (sulfate sugar) reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae arsenosugar (sulfate sugar) reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight. Algae, powder or ground; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤76 | 3600–3640 (bounded) | 7200 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤76 | 3600–3640 (bounded) | 7200 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| García-Salgado et al. 2012 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, powder or ground on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
García-Salgado et al. 2012 is the only compatible sampling family for algae, powder or ground on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-b001469d9e28:3deed5c41fd1
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae arsenosugar (sulfonate sugar) reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae arsenosugar (sulfonate sugar) reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight. Algae, powder or ground; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤62 | 300–331 (bounded) | 600 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤62 | 300–331 (bounded) | 600 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| García-Salgado et al. 2012 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, powder or ground on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
García-Salgado et al. 2012 is the only compatible sampling family for algae, powder or ground on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-b74236cb9e6d:0218ccd684cf
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae As(III) reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae As(III) reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight. Algae, powder or ground; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤19 | ≤19 | ≤19 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤19 | ≤19 | ≤19 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| García-Salgado et al. 2012 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, powder or ground on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
García-Salgado et al. 2012 is the only compatible sampling family for algae, powder or ground on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-58d4e294642d:3733c8d5937f
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae As(V) reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae As(V) reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight. Algae, powder or ground; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 11000 | 44000 | 77000 |
| Alternative weighting | 11000 | 44000 | 77000 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| García-Salgado et al. 2012 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, powder or ground on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
García-Salgado et al. 2012 is the only compatible sampling family for algae, powder or ground on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-79720a3c3ddd:68e21c0db6be
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae AsB reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae AsB reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight. Algae, powder or ground; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤33 | ≤33 | ≤33 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤33 | ≤33 | ≤33 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| García-Salgado et al. 2012 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, powder or ground on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
García-Salgado et al. 2012 is the only compatible sampling family for algae, powder or ground on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-697715c800d8:09151095f1e3
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae TETRA reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae TETRA reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight. Algae, powder or ground; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤67 | ≤67 | ≤67 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤67 | ≤67 | ≤67 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| García-Salgado et al. 2012 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, powder or ground on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
García-Salgado et al. 2012 is the only compatible sampling family for algae, powder or ground on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-34b771bde32e:5b0862b014fa
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae TMAO reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae TMAO reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight. Algae, powder or ground; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤64 | ≤64 | ≤64 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤64 | ≤64 | ≤64 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| García-Salgado et al. 2012 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, powder or ground on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
García-Salgado et al. 2012 is the only compatible sampling family for algae, powder or ground on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-eed192b56bd5:000b11a335a7
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI algae water-extractable As reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI algae water-extractable As reference · Algae, powder or ground, dry weight. Algae, powder or ground; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 36000 | 64000 | 92000 |
| Alternative weighting | 36000 | 64000 | 92000 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| García-Salgado et al. 2012 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for algae, powder or ground on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1 to Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
García-Salgado et al. 2012 is the only compatible sampling family for algae, powder or ground on this basis in the completed algae ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:algae-f64881070243:ccbdf3c2a45e
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
The source reports only a percentile, range or maximum for these samples, with no mean or median to place against the reference. Spread figures that do have a mean or median are shown on that row instead.
The value could not be reconciled with its own paper, so it is shown but not compared.
The result is below a reporting limit, and the range from zero to that limit crosses more than one band.
No medians or sample values exist for this form and metal, so no HMI reference could be built.
The HMI reference for this form has fewer than four units or no measurable spread, below the display minimum.
The result is on a basis (dry weight, or not stated) that no HMI reference for this form uses, so it cannot be placed.
No findings match these filters. Change the selection or reset to show all source findings.
How metals reach algae
No study in the library compared algae from contaminated and ordinary settings, so the routes by which metals reach it are not measured here.
Which forms and regions measured lower
For total arsenic, the HMI reference median was lowest for algae, as sold (9,050 µg/kg) and highest for algae, as sold (32,200 µg/kg); forms differ in water content, so this compares foods as sold or eaten, not uptake.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →8Scientific Opinion on Arsenic in FoodEFSA Journal 2009;7(10):1351Read source → The HMI reference for lead in algae, dried pools 10 subgroup units from 1 sampling family, with a median of 300 µg/kg and a middle half spanning 190 (lower quartile) and 930 µg/kg (upper quartile).9Heavy Metal, Total Arsenic, and Inorganic Arsenic Contents of Algae Food ProductsJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistryRead source → For cadmium in algae, dried, the reference median was 380 µg/kg, with a middle half from 170 to 750 µg/kg across 15 units.9Heavy Metal, Total Arsenic, and Inorganic Arsenic Contents of Algae Food ProductsJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistryRead source → For total arsenic in algae, as sold, the reference median was 32,200 µg/kg, with a middle half from 13,500 to 43,700 µg/kg across 4 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →8Scientific Opinion on Arsenic in FoodEFSA Journal 2009;7(10):1351Read source →
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, algae, as sold had the lowest total arsenic subgroup median in WPRO (890 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (41,800 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For inorganic arsenic, the lowest regional median was in WPRO (60 µg/kg) and the highest in PAHO (637 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
In one study, lead across 10 groups of algae ranged from 150 µg/kg (retail product 7) to 1,330 µg/kg (retail product 1); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.9Heavy Metal, Total Arsenic, and Inorganic Arsenic Contents of Algae Food ProductsJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistryRead source →
Processing, cooking and preparation
No processing study for metals in this food is in the library yet.
Mitigation for algae
Lot testing against the applicable limit is the check that can be verified.
No measured way to lower metals in this food is in the library yet.
Trade-offs and limits of controls
Metals do not move together, so a lot that passes a lead limit says little about cadmium, arsenic or nickel unless those are tested as well.
Testing algae for metals
Results depend on the method and its reporting limit. Reporting limits for lead ranged from 1 µg/kg (Kim et al. 2023) to 50 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →5Risk Assessment and Determination of Arsenic and Heavy Metals in Fishery Products in KoreaFoodsRead source → Reporting limits for cadmium ranged from 1 µg/kg (Kim et al. 2023) to 40 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →5Risk Assessment and Determination of Arsenic and Heavy Metals in Fishery Products in KoreaFoodsRead source → Reporting limits for total arsenic ranged from 1 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food) to 398 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
A useful lot result names the form, the basis and a quantification limit well below the limit that applies.
Buying and verifying algae
No maximum level for metals in algae was verified from primary text for this page; buyers should confirm the limit that applies in the destination market.
Exposure from algae
No source in the library converted algae concentrations into a verified estimate of intake for a defined population. Concentrations describe the food, not individual risk.
Evidence review and remaining gaps
Every source record that names algae was decided on its content: 14 occurrence extracted, 14 records in all. The occurrence table renders every extracted result; held values remain visible with their reason.
References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.
Algae FAQs
What heavy metals are found in algae?
The library reports lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, monomethylarsonic acid, total mercury, methylmercury, chromium, aluminium, arsenosugar (glycerol sugar), arsenosugar (phosphate sugar), arsenosugar (sulfate sugar), arsenosugar (sulfonate sugar), As(III), As(V), AsB, I, TETRA, TMAO and water-extractable As in algae, most often lead, cadmium and total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Dietary exposure to heavy metals and iodine intake via consumption of seaweeds and halophytes in the European populationEFSA JournalRead source →3Results of the BfR MEAL Study: In Germany, mercury is mostly contained in fish and seafood while cadmium, lead, and nickel are present in a broad spectrum of foodsFood Chemistry: XRead source →4Scientific Opinion on Lead in FoodEFSA Journal 2010;8(4):1570Read source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in algae, as sold from 18 results in 2 reporting regions, with subgroup medians below 50 µg/kg, mostly non-detects.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Which types of algae have the lowest levels?
For total arsenic, the HMI reference median was lowest for algae, as sold (9,050 µg/kg) and highest for algae, as sold (32,200 µg/kg); forms differ in water content, so this compares foods as sold or eaten, not uptake.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →8Scientific Opinion on Arsenic in FoodEFSA Journal 2009;7(10):1351Read source →
Which regions report the lowest levels in algae?
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, algae, as sold had the lowest total arsenic subgroup median in WPRO (890 µg/kg) and the highest in EURO (41,800 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → For inorganic arsenic, the lowest regional median was in WPRO (60 µg/kg) and the highest in PAHO (637 µg/kg).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
How much of the arsenic in algae is inorganic?
Inorganic arsenic, the more toxic form, was measured in 32 results from 6 sources, far fewer than total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2Dietary exposure to heavy metals and iodine intake via consumption of seaweeds and halophytes in the European populationEFSA JournalRead source →10Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationEFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3597Read source →9Heavy Metal, Total Arsenic, and Inorganic Arsenic Contents of Algae Food ProductsJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistryRead source →11Total and inorganic arsenic concentrations in different species of economically important algae harvested from coastal zones of ChileFood and Chemical ToxicologyRead source →12Arsenic speciation in edible alga samples by microwave-assisted extraction and high performance liquid chromatography coupled to atomic fluorescence spectrometryAnalytica Chimica ActaRead source → European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2023 reported inorganic arsenic at 241 µg/kg (mean) in algae, as sold from EU occurrence data.2Dietary exposure to heavy metals and iodine intake via consumption of seaweeds and halophytes in the European populationEFSA JournalRead source →
References
Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.
- GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsDataset
- Dietary exposure to heavy metals and iodine intake via consumption of seaweeds and halophytes in the European populationPeer-reviewed
- Results of the BfR MEAL Study: In Germany, mercury is mostly contained in fish and seafood while cadmium, lead, and nickel are present in a broad spectrum of foodsPeer-reviewed
- Scientific Opinion on Lead in FoodGovernment
- Risk Assessment and Determination of Arsenic and Heavy Metals in Fishery Products in KoreaPeer-reviewed
- Dietary Lead Exposure and Associated Health Risks in Guangzhou, ChinaPeer-reviewed
- Dietary Exposure of the Taiwan Population to Mercury Content in Various Seafood Assessed by a Total Diet StudyPeer-reviewed
- Scientific Opinion on Arsenic in FoodGovernment
- Heavy Metal, Total Arsenic, and Inorganic Arsenic Contents of Algae Food ProductsPeer-reviewed
- Dietary exposure to inorganic arsenic in the European populationGovernment
- Total and inorganic arsenic concentrations in different species of economically important algae harvested from coastal zones of ChilePeer-reviewed
- Arsenic speciation in edible alga samples by microwave-assisted extraction and high performance liquid chromatography coupled to atomic fluorescence spectrometryPeer-reviewed
Sources
Browse Algae Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.
Update history
22 October 2026: Rebuilt from every algae record in the library: 14 occurrence sources, references by form and basis, same-study contrasts.
