Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

University of Technology Malaysia, Malaysia Lana Abbas , Oliver Coutinho , Aleksa Fortuna , Fatima Sulaiman ,

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the methylmercury infant-formula research pull.

Page snapshot
Cited by11 pages
Metals measured8
Evidence tierB
Year2023

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the methylmercury infant-formula research pull. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • RECEIVED 17 August 2023 Department of Natural Sciences, University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, MI, United States
  • and biosorption characteristics of four bacterial strains (Serratia sp. L2, Raoultella
  • Farinas J, Schittenhelm R, Catalfano B, Li X and sp. L30, Klebsiella sp. R3, and Klebsiella sp. R19) isolated from Saint Clair River
  • Tiquia-Arashiro SM (2023) Metal tolerance and sediments. These strains effectively removed various metal cations (As3+, Pb2+,
  • Cu2+, Mn2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Cr6+, and Ni2+) in single and multi-metal solutions. Minimum
  • Front. Microbiol. 14:1278886. inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays revealed strain-specific variations in metal
  • doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1278886 tolerance, with L2 and L30 exhibiting higher tolerance. Surprisingly, R3 and
  • COPYRIGHT R19, despite lower tolerance, demonstrated superior metal removal efficiency,
  • © 2023 Pagnucco, Overfield, Chamlee, Shuler, challenging the notion that tolerance dictates removal efficacy. In single-metal
  • solutions, R3 and R19 excelled at extracting various metal ions, while competitive
  • Catalfano, Li and Tiquia-Arashiro. This is an binding in multi-metal solutions hindered removal. However, R3 and R19 retained
  • in metal distribution patterns between Klebsiella sp. R19 and Raoultella sp. L30
  • Frontiers in Microbiology 01 frontiersin.org
  • Pagnucco et al. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1278886
    1. Introduction development of microbial processes that will concentrate, remove, and
  • concern in recent years. The escalating processes of industrialization soluble metals can readily penetrate cell membranes (Roane, 1999;
  • and urbanization have contributed to the significant release of heavy Tiquia-Arashiro, 2018; Jeong et al., 2023). To counteract this, bacteria
  • metals into aquatic ecosystems (Boening, 2000; Zamora-Ledezma et al., employ immobilization strategies to counteract the toxic effect of
  • 2021; Goswami and Neog, 2023). The release of heavy metals into heavy metals, which includes precipitation, intracellular accumulation,
  • industrial discharges, urban runoff, and agricultural activities (Tiquia, and Sadler, 1984; Roane, 1999; van Hullebusch et al., 2003; Tiquia-
  • 2010; Oest et al., 2018; Patel et al., 2019; Narwal et al., 2023). These Arashiro, 2018; Vandana et al., 2023). EPSs typically consist of
  • and Neog, 2023). As heavy metals accumulate in aquatic environments, interactions with cationic metal ions, ultimately leading to the
  • to aquatic life and endangering the health of humans who rely on these 2019). The effectiveness of EPS-mediated biosorption in efficiently
  • recreational activities (Tiquia, 2011; Sharma et al., 2023). Additionally, (Shameer, 2016; Vishan et al., 2017; Saba et al., 2019; Sharma and
  • heavy metal contamination can have far-reaching ecological Saraf, 2023). As a result, biosorption via EPS has garnered substantial
  • terrestrial ecosystems as well (Ledin, 2000; Ahmad et al., 2021). Among from the ecosystem but are also required to be recovered from every
  • (Boulanger and Nikolaidis, 2003; Tchounwou et al., 2012; Queiroz et al., interests due to their ecological importance and practical implications.
  • 2021). These heavy metals find their way into the environment through Despite the isolation of diverse bacterial strains, the significance
  • Neog, 2023). Traditional techniques such as reverse osmosis, ion paramount. This approach is not only environmentally sound but also
  • efficacy (Volesky, 1990; Qasem et al., 2021). In response, the 2013; Bhatt et al., 2023). In our previous study (Bowman et al., 2018),
  • employment of microorganisms for heavy metal removal has emerged we isolated Pb-resistant bacterial strains, Klebsiella sp. R3, Klebsiella
  • as a highly promising alternative. This approach holds advantages by sp. R19, Serratia sp. L2, and Raoultella sp. L30 from sediments of the
  • the avoidance of sludge disposal requirements (Kim et al., 1996; Bruins Pb2+ from solution and produce a high rate of flocculation activity
  • et al., 2000; Lakherwal, 2014). (Bowman et al., 2018). Furthermore, these bacterial strains are well
  • (Tiquia-Arashiro, 2018). The bioremediation of heavy metals can removal of these strains in aqueous multi-metal solutions has not
  • ions by living biomass, and biosorption, a passive process where metal This study aims to (1) assess the selective metal removal abilities of
  • cations are adhered to non-living biomass (Razzak et al., 2022; the bacterial strains in the presence of multiple heavy metals (As3+,
  • Jeyakumari et al., 2023). In the context of bioaccumulation, energy is Pb2+, Cu2+, Mn2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Cr6+), (2) investigate the interactions
  • expended for the absorption of metal ions, usually achieved through between these metals during the sorption process, and (3) uncover
  • in the cell wall or exported metabolites within the external 2. Materials and methods
  • exchange, complexation, precipitation, reduction, and chelation 2.1. Bacterial strains
  • (Vishan et al., 2017; Priya et al., 2022; Sreedevi et al., 2022).

Methods (brief)

  • The bacterial strains used in this study are resistant to Pb and grew of the metals in solution using an atomic absorption spectrometer
  • As (NaAsO2), Cr (K2Cr2O7), Cd (CdCl2), Cu (CuCl2.2H20), Pb (Pb culture media without cells) was also monitored to confirm that
  • with metals. Samples were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in Sorensen mg L−1).
  • samples were placed on the sample holder (stub) with carbon tape. To = Ni2+ > Cd2+ > Cr6+; for Klebsiella sp. R19, it was Mn2+ > Pb2+ > Zn2+
  • improve electron conduction, the samples were sputter coated > As3+ > Cu2+ = Ni2+ > Cd2+ > Cr6+; for Serratia sp. L2, it was Mn2+ >
  • with phosphate buffer saline (pH 6.8). After washing, the samples were solutions, each containing 10 mg L−1 of As3+, Pb2+, Cu2+, Mn2+, Zn2+,
  • the samples were washed with 0.1 M carbonate buffer and 0.1 M Na2 was more pronounced for Klebsiella sp. R3 and Klebsiella sp. R19

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
3171d062026-08-02major1 section added
bc84bfc2026-08-02major6 sections added; narrative text revised