Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index
Butternut and winter squash, summer squash, zucchini and eggplant illustrating eggplant ingredient context.

Heavy metals in Eggplant

Lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic and total mercury in eggplant: monitoring results, studies, references by form and basis, limits, testing and controls.

Quick read

Eggplant in the HMI library has 303 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, monomethylarsonic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ag, arsenic (As), B, Ba, mercury (Hg), Mo, Sr and Ti from 27 sources.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Guerra F, Trevizam AR, Muraoka T, Marcante NC, Canniatti-Brazaca SG · 2012Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →4Kawsar Hossen, Nahian Rahman, Zannatul Ferdowsi, Tahmina Ferdous · 2026Assessment of heavy metal levels and associated health risks linked to vegetables grown in Noakhali region of BangladeshEnvironmental Health InsightsRead source →5Ahmed TA · 2024EVALUATION OF HEAVY METALS IN A SELECTION OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN VEGETABLES COLLECTED AT THE ERBIL MARKETMalaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 8(2):80-82Read source →6Al Othman ZA · 2010Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakeMolecules 2010, 15, 7482-7497Read source →

Eggplant overview

Eggplant in the HMI library has 303 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, monomethylarsonic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ag, As, B, Ba, Hg, Mo, Sr and Ti from 27 sources.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Guerra F, Trevizam AR, Muraoka T, Marcante NC, Canniatti-Brazaca SG · 2012Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →4Kawsar Hossen, Nahian Rahman, Zannatul Ferdowsi, Tahmina Ferdous · 2026Assessment of heavy metal levels and associated health risks linked to vegetables grown in Noakhali region of BangladeshEnvironmental Health InsightsRead source →5Ahmed TA · 2024EVALUATION OF HEAVY METALS IN A SELECTION OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN VEGETABLES COLLECTED AT THE ERBIL MARKETMalaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 8(2):80-82Read source →6Al Othman ZA · 2010Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakeMolecules 2010, 15, 7482-7497Read source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in eggplant, as sold from 244 results in 3 reporting regions, with a subgroup median of 5 µg/kg.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In the US Total Diet Study, eggplant, cooked had a median lead result below 4 µg/kg across 6 composites from 2017–2018.2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →

Across 8 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported lead means and medians on a dry-weight basis ranged from 10 µg/kg (Saleem et al. 2025) to 62,500 µg/kg (Younis et al. 2023).8Saleem M, Wang Y, Pierce D, Sens DA, Somji S, Garrett SH · 2025Concentration and Potential Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Risk Assessment of Metals in Locally Grown VegetablesFoodsRead source →9Younis AM, Darwesh DA · 2023Assessment of Heavy Metals in Some Local and Imported Vegetables in Erbil MarketKirkuk Journal of Science 18(4):54-64Read source → For cadmium, 2 studies on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis reported means and medians from 11 µg/kg (Spungen et al. 2024) to 40 µg/kg (Guerra et al. 2012).3Guerra F, Trevizam AR, Muraoka T, Marcante NC, Canniatti-Brazaca SG · 2012Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →10Spungen JH, et al. · 2024Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source → Higher results came from contaminated or exposed settings rather than ordinary supply. Eggplant, as sold from Location B1 (industrial-affected area) had total mercury higher at 43.4 µg/kg, against 0.43 µg/kg for Control (grocery store >55 km from any power plant) in the same study.7Li R, Wu H, Ding J, Fu W, Gan L, Li Y · 2017Mercury pollution in vegetables, grains and soils from areas surrounding coal-fired power plantsScientific ReportsRead source →

For a buyer the practical points are the form bought, the basis a result is reported on, where the eggplant came from and the laboratory’s reporting limit. Testing finds contamination but does not remove it.

What counts as eggplant

This page covers eggplant in 2 forms kept separate in every comparison: eggplant, as sold (285 results) and eggplant, cooked (18 results).1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Guerra F, Trevizam AR, Muraoka T, Marcante NC, Canniatti-Brazaca SG · 2012Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →4Kawsar Hossen, Nahian Rahman, Zannatul Ferdowsi, Tahmina Ferdous · 2026Assessment of heavy metal levels and associated health risks linked to vegetables grown in Noakhali region of BangladeshEnvironmental Health InsightsRead source →5Ahmed TA · 2024EVALUATION OF HEAVY METALS IN A SELECTION OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN VEGETABLES COLLECTED AT THE ERBIL MARKETMalaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 8(2):80-82Read source →6Al Othman ZA · 2010Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakeMolecules 2010, 15, 7482-7497Read source →

Results stay on the basis each source reports: as sold or fresh weight, dry weight, or unstated. Dry-weight, as-sold and unstated results are never pooled, and no moisture conversion is applied.

Heavy metal contamination profile of eggplant

The table holds every extracted eggplant result: one row for each statistic a source reports for a form, group and metal, 303 rows in all, grouped by metal and form; percentiles, ranges and maxima for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Guerra F, Trevizam AR, Muraoka T, Marcante NC, Canniatti-Brazaca SG · 2012Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →4Kawsar Hossen, Nahian Rahman, Zannatul Ferdowsi, Tahmina Ferdous · 2026Assessment of heavy metal levels and associated health risks linked to vegetables grown in Noakhali region of BangladeshEnvironmental Health InsightsRead source →5Ahmed TA · 2024EVALUATION OF HEAVY METALS IN A SELECTION OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN VEGETABLES COLLECTED AT THE ERBIL MARKETMalaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 8(2):80-82Read source →6Al Othman ZA · 2010Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakeMolecules 2010, 15, 7482-7497Read source → Monitoring medians are HMI calculations from individual submissions; non-detects remain intervals between zero and the reporting limit and are never read as zero.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

165 rows can be rated against an HMI reference for the same form and basis, 6 rows have a direct same-study comparison, and the rest stay unrated with the reason recorded. 13 values from 4 sources failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.4Kawsar Hossen, Nahian Rahman, Zannatul Ferdowsi, Tahmina Ferdous · 2026Assessment of heavy metal levels and associated health risks linked to vegetables grown in Noakhali region of BangladeshEnvironmental Health InsightsRead source →11Liang G, Gong W, Li B, Zuo J, Pan L, Liu X · 2019Analysis of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs and an Assessment of the Health Risks to the General Public via Consumption in Beijing, ChinaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthRead source →12Imongben CO, Tomori WB, Umoru PE, Oyerinde WA · 2026Determination of some heavy metals and their potential risk in selected vegetables on sale within Kaduna Metropolis, Kaduna State, NigeriaWorld NutritionRead source →13Wadood SA, Sharif MK, Ashraf MN, Ejaz R, Kosar G, Azeem M, Murtaza G · 2021Estimation of Heavy Metals and Associated Health Risk in Selected Vegetables Grown in Peri-Urban Areas of Multan and Rawalpindi, PakistanPakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research Series B: Biological Sciences 64B(1): 55-63 (2021)Read source →

Comparison methods and scope

Each row is one statistic a source reports for one form of eggplant, group and metal; percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Different forms and preparation states are kept apart, and dry-weight results never share a reference with as-sold or fresh-weight results. Ratings place a result against an HMI reference built from monitoring results and ordinary-setting medians for the same form and basis. Same-study contrasts compare a contaminated or treated site with its control, targeted with random sampling, a prepared form with the unprocessed one, or one group of a study with the median of its other groups. Held rows failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.

About this table
Food formCollection scopeFindingComparisonEvidence
Eggplant findings from monitoring programmes, total diet studies and every extracted field, market and contaminated-site study, in µg/kg with each source’s form, basis, statistic and censoring retained.
Food formCollection scopeFinding (µg/kg)ComparisonEvidence
46 findings · 20 studies
Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2016–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2000–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2014–2016As sold / freshmedian.
Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodSEARO2012As sold / freshmedian.
Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011As sold / freshmedian.
Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2013As sold / freshmedian.
Eggplant, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / freshmean.
Eggplant, as soldHossen et al. 2026farm 12024As sold / freshmean.
Eggplant, as soldAhmed 2024imported vegetables, Erbil marketCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldAhmed 2024local vegetables, Erbil marketCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldAl 2010Vegetables, Riyadh city markets, May 20092009mean.
Eggplant, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026fruiting vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group II2021–2022mean.
Eggplant, as soldIessa et al. 2024fruit vegetable, Sebha local market, 20232023not detected.
Eggplant, as soldLiang et al. 2019Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023Kamal Ranjit (KR) market, all occasionsCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023Kamal Ranjit (KR) market, occasion 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023Kamal Ranjit (KR) market, occasion 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023Kamal Ranjit (KR) market, occasion 3Collection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023Sesh More (SM) bazar, all occasionsCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023Sesh More (SM) bazar, occasion 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023Sesh More (SM) bazar, occasion 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023Sesh More (SM) bazar, occasion 3Collection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldRani et al. 2025fruit vegetable2017–2018mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024local market2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021all four phases, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 1, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportednot detected.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 2, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportednot detected.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 3, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 4, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportednot detected.
Eggplant, as soldWadood et al. 2021peri-urban markets, Multan regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023imported, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023locally grown, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldAbbas et al. 2010fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not statedmean.
Eggplant, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
4 findings · 2 studies
Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study5 collection regions2017–2018As sold / freshmedian.
Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study6 collection regions2018–2020As sold / freshmedian.
Eggplant, cookedSpungen et al. 2024all samples2018–2020As sold / freshnot detected.
Eggplant, cookedSpungen et al. 2024all samples2018–2020As sold / freshnot detected.
44 findings · 20 studies
Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodEMRO2018As sold / freshmedian.
Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2003–2017As sold / freshmedian.
Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodPAHO2015–2016As sold / freshmedian.
Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011As sold / freshmedian.
Eggplant, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / freshmean.
Eggplant, as soldHossen et al. 2026farm 12024As sold / freshmean.
Eggplant, as soldAhmed 2024imported vegetables, Erbil marketCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldAhmed 2024local vegetables, Erbil marketCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026fruiting vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group II2021–2022mean.
Eggplant, as soldIessa et al. 2024fruit vegetable, Sebha local market, 20232023not detected.
Eggplant, as soldLiang et al. 2019Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023Kamal Ranjit (KR) market, all occasionsCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023Kamal Ranjit (KR) market, occasion 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023Kamal Ranjit (KR) market, occasion 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023Kamal Ranjit (KR) market, occasion 3Collection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023Sesh More (SM) bazar, all occasionsCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023Sesh More (SM) bazar, occasion 1Collection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023Sesh More (SM) bazar, occasion 2Collection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023Sesh More (SM) bazar, occasion 3Collection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldRani et al. 2025fruit vegetable2017–2018mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024local market2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021all four phases, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 1, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportednot detected.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 2, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 3, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 4, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportednot detected.
Eggplant, as soldWadood et al. 2021peri-urban markets, Multan regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023imported, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023locally grown, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldAbbas et al. 2010fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not statedmean.
Eggplant, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Eggplant, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not statedmean.
Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
4 findings · 2 studies
Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study5 collection regions2017–2018As sold / freshmedian.
Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study6 collection regions2018–2020As sold / freshmedian.
Eggplant, cookedSpungen et al. 2024all samples2018–2020As sold / freshmean.
Eggplant, cookedSpungen et al. 2024all samples2018–2020As sold / freshmean.
19 findings · 9 studies · 1 spread figure folded in
Eggplant, as soldHossen et al. 2026farm 12024As sold / freshmean.
Eggplant, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.Same samples: 7,200 µg/kg (maximum)
Eggplant, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmin.
Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group II2021–2022mean.
Eggplant, as soldLiang et al. 2019Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024local market2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023imported, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023locally grown, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldAbbas et al. 2010fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not statedmean.
Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study5 collection regions2017–2018As sold / freshmedian.
Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study6 collection regions2018–2020As sold / freshmedian.
4 findings · 3 studies · 1 spread figure folded in
Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011As sold / freshmedian.
Eggplant, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.Same samples: 3,000 µg/kg (maximum)
Eggplant, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmin.
Eggplant, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
2 findings · 1 study · 1 spread figure folded in
Eggplant, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.Same samples: 4,400 µg/kg (maximum)
Eggplant, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmin.
2 findings · 1 study · 1 spread figure folded in
Eggplant, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmean.Same samples: 1,900 µg/kg (maximum)
Eggplant, as soldLaizu 2007fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedAs sold / freshmin.
13 findings · 4 studies
Eggplant, as soldLi et al. 2017Control (grocery store >55 km from any power plant)2015As sold / freshmean.
Eggplant, as soldLi et al. 2017Location A12015As sold / freshmean.
Eggplant, as soldLi et al. 2017Location A22015As sold / freshmean.
Eggplant, as soldLi et al. 2017Location B12015As sold / freshmean.
Eggplant, as soldLi et al. 2017Location B22015As sold / freshmean.
Eggplant, as soldLi et al. 2017Location B32015As sold / freshmean.
Eggplant, as soldLi et al. 2017Location B42015As sold / freshmean.
Eggplant, as soldLiang et al. 2019Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldAbbas et al. 2010fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not statedmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study5 collection regions2017–2018As sold / freshmedian.
Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study6 collection regions2018–2020As sold / freshmedian.
18 findings · 10 studies
Eggplant, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / freshmean.
Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group II2021–2022mean.
Eggplant, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldRani et al. 2025fruit vegetable2017–2018mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024local market2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021all four phases, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 1, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 2, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportednot detected.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 3, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportednot detected.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 4, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldWadood et al. 2021peri-urban markets, Multan regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023imported, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023locally grown, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreportednot detected.
Eggplant, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study5 collection regions2017–2018As sold / freshmedian.
Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study6 collection regions2018–2020As sold / freshmedian.
24 findings · 13 studies
Eggplant, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / freshmean.
Eggplant, as soldHossen et al. 2026farm 12024As sold / freshmean.
Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group II2021–2022mean.
Eggplant, as soldIessa et al. 2024fruit vegetable, Sebha local market, 20232023not detected.
Eggplant, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldLiang et al. 2019Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldRani et al. 2025fruit vegetable2017–2018mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024local market2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021all four phases, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 1, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 2, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportednot detected.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 3, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 4, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldWadood et al. 2021peri-urban markets, Multan regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023imported, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023locally grown, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreportedmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study5 collection regions2017–2018As sold / freshmedian.
Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study6 collection regions2018–2020As sold / freshmedian.
8 findings · 5 studies
Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group II2021–2022mean.
Eggplant, as soldRani et al. 2025fruit vegetable2017–2018mean.
Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023imported, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023locally grown, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not statedmean.
2 findings · 2 studies
Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/FoodWPRO2010–2011As sold / freshmedian.
Eggplant, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Eggplant, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statednot detected.
2 findings · 1 study
Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study5 collection regions2017–2018As sold / freshmedian.
Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study6 collection regions2018–2020As sold / freshmedian.
9 findings · 6 studies
Eggplant, as soldGuerra et al. 2012CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / freshmean.
Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group II2021–2022mean.
Eggplant, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldRani et al. 2025fruit vegetable2017–2018mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024local market2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
20 findings · 10 studies
Eggplant, as soldHossen et al. 2026farm 12024As sold / freshmean.
Eggplant, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026fruiting vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group II2021–2022mean.
Eggplant, as soldIessa et al. 2024fruit vegetable, Sebha local market, 20232023not detected.
Eggplant, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldRani et al. 2025fruit vegetable2017–2018mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024local market2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021all four phases, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 1, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 2, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 3, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 4, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
14 findings · 9 studies
Eggplant, as soldHossen et al. 2026farm 12024As sold / freshmean.
Eggplant, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026fruiting vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group II2021–2022mean.
Eggplant, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldRani et al. 2025fruit vegetable2017–2018mean.
Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021all four phases, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 1, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 2, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 3, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 4, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldWadood et al. 2021peri-urban markets, Multan regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023imported, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023locally grown, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreportedmean.
14 findings · 8 studies
Eggplant, as soldAhmed 2024imported vegetables, Erbil marketCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldAhmed 2024local vegetables, Erbil marketCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group II2021–2022mean.
Eggplant, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldRani et al. 2025fruit vegetable2017–2018mean.
Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021all four phases, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 1, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 2, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 3, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 4, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldWadood et al. 2021peri-urban markets, Multan regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023imported, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023locally grown, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreportedmean.
19 findings · 10 studies
Eggplant, as soldAhmed 2024imported vegetables, Erbil marketCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldAhmed 2024local vegetables, Erbil marketCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026fruiting vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group II2021–2022mean.
Eggplant, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldRani et al. 2025fruit vegetable2017–2018mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024local market2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021all four phases, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 1, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 2, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 3, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021sampling phase 4, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreportedsample value.
Eggplant, as soldWadood et al. 2021peri-urban markets, Multan regionCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023imported, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023locally grown, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreportedmean.
2 findings · 2 studies
Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group II2021–2022mean.
Eggplant, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013all samples2010–2011Basis not statedmean.
1 finding · 1 study
Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
2 findings · 1 study
Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023imported, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023locally grown, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreportednot detected.
1 finding · 1 study
Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
4 findings · 1 study
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024local market2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023mean.
4 findings · 1 study
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024local market2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023mean.
1 finding · 1 study
Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025all samplesCollection date unreportedmean.
5 findings · 2 studies
Eggplant, as soldImongben et al. 2026five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreportedmean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024local market2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023mean.
Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023mean.
1 finding · 1 study
Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group II2021–2022mean.
1 finding · 1 study
Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025Group II2021–2022mean.
Shared dataset methods and interpretation

Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.

HMI eggplant Pb reference · Eggplant, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI eggplant Pb reference · Eggplant, as sold. Eggplant, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤4≤7≤7
Alternative weighting≤5≤7≤7

24 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food24100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, as sold on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-dbbf875b27c9:8ea15cf0b424

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI eggplant Pb reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI eggplant Pb reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight. Eggplant, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference20003960102000
Alternative weighting20003960102000

7 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Ahmed 2024233%
Shivakumar et al. 2020433%
Sultana et al. 2021133%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-787f103cd2de:74b686e10514

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI eggplant Pb reference · Eggplant, cooked

Reference and scope

HMI eggplant Pb reference · Eggplant, cooked. Eggplant, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤4≤4≤4
Alternative weighting≤4≤4≤4

29 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study2750%
Spungen et al. 2024250%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-213f74523486:d7368e9b784c

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI eggplant Cd reference · Eggplant, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI eggplant Cd reference · Eggplant, as sold. Eggplant, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference610.813.5
Alternative weighting610.813.5

18 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food18100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, as sold on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-c59ebf2d0603:c415c131ce1b

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI eggplant Cd reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI eggplant Cd reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight. Eggplant, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference80.56007000
Alternative weighting80.56007000

8 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Ahmed 2024233%
Shivakumar et al. 2020433%
Sultana et al. 2021233%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-d5ee6223f1c2:bd9f7842d33a

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI eggplant Cd reference · Eggplant, cooked

Reference and scope

HMI eggplant Cd reference · Eggplant, cooked. Eggplant, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference6.91115
Alternative weighting7.211.515

27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study27100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, cooked on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-39e3efcd9893:5c5687fc7016

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI eggplant tAs reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI eggplant tAs reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight. Eggplant, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference3872198
Alternative weighting3872198

4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Shivakumar et al. 20204100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Shivakumar et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, as sold on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-e9db81406b20:69c4fe34b443

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI eggplant tAs reference · Eggplant, cooked

Reference and scope

HMI eggplant tAs reference · Eggplant, cooked. Eggplant, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤37.411
Alternative weighting3.47.511

27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study27100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, cooked on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-cb9315112154:9eaa54148ddd

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI eggplant iAs reference · Eggplant, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI eggplant iAs reference · Eggplant, as sold. Eggplant, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤31.5–3 (bounded)3
Alternative weighting≤31.5–3 (bounded)3

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food2100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, as sold on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-5e04ab8048a7:b2cb50835e3b

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI eggplant tHg reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI eggplant tHg reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight. Eggplant, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference25.5311670
Alternative weighting25.5311670

4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Shivakumar et al. 20204100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Shivakumar et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, as sold on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-720528a1ddbd:64b3d3e7d7a3

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI eggplant tHg reference · Eggplant, cooked

Reference and scope

HMI eggplant tHg reference · Eggplant, cooked. Eggplant, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤1≤1≤1
Alternative weighting≤1≤1≤1

27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study27100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, cooked on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-07814cadaa62:72fcfd40b72b

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI eggplant Ni reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI eggplant Ni reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight. Eggplant, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference170019502200
Alternative weighting170019502200

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Sultana et al. 20212100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Sultana et al. 2021 is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, as sold on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-19a3dd873ba1:02a2f0076cd3

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI eggplant Ni reference · Eggplant, cooked

Reference and scope

HMI eggplant Ni reference · Eggplant, cooked. Eggplant, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤40≤40≤40
Alternative weighting≤40≤40≤40

27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study27100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, cooked on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-1fc3c91f36af:83a08732176e

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI eggplant Cr reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI eggplant Cr reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight. Eggplant, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference121030305600
Alternative weighting121030305600

7 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Shivakumar et al. 2020450%
Sultana et al. 2021350%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-31bfa5c5247c:9c6e249656b7

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI eggplant Cr reference · Eggplant, cooked

Reference and scope

HMI eggplant Cr reference · Eggplant, cooked. Eggplant, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤50≤50≤50
Alternative weighting≤50≤50≤50

27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study27100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, cooked on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-30feca7a5b2a:c0ecd2d364b7

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI eggplant Sn reference · Eggplant, as sold

Reference and scope

HMI eggplant Sn reference · Eggplant, as sold. Eggplant, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤10≤10≤10
Alternative weighting≤10≤10≤10

2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
WHO GEMS/Food2100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, as sold on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-3de65b587c56:fd32c7cd527c

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI eggplant U reference · Eggplant, cooked

Reference and scope

HMI eggplant U reference · Eggplant, cooked. Eggplant, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference≤1≤1≤1
Alternative weighting≤1≤1≤1

27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
FDA Total Diet Study27100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, cooked on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-e238fc3212e7:2bdea0bffc98

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI eggplant Cu reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI eggplant Cu reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight. Eggplant, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference38001330018300
Alternative weighting38001330018300

8 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Shivakumar et al. 2020450%
Sultana et al. 2021450%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-2928b73cd5ed:b48cd3007555

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI eggplant Fe reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI eggplant Fe reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight. Eggplant, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference4680077100154000
Alternative weighting4680077100154000

4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Sultana et al. 20214100%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

Sultana et al. 2021 is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, as sold on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-f3e74d949586:d8eb98e788c5

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI eggplant Mn reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI eggplant Mn reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight. Eggplant, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference197002820030000
Alternative weighting197002820030000

6 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Ahmed 2024250%
Sultana et al. 2021450%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-aaee766f9fbc:dd443c58ee38

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

HMI eggplant Zn reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight

Reference and scope

HMI eggplant Zn reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight. Eggplant, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.

Reference (µg/kg)Q1MedianQ3
Primary HMI reference211004150053500
Alternative weighting211004150053500

6 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.

Contributing familyReference unitsWeight
Ahmed 2024250%
Sultana et al. 2021450%

Methods

HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.

Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.

Limitations

2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.

Admitted source families

Reference version and interpretation

Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.

hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-57ad22fbd608:46ecd78732d9

The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.

1 dataset

How metals reach eggplant

The evidence on how metals reach eggplant comes from studies that compared exposed and ordinary settings. Eggplant, as sold from Location B1 (industrial-affected area) had total mercury higher at 43.4 µg/kg, against 0.43 µg/kg for Control (grocery store >55 km from any power plant) in the same study.7Li R, Wu H, Ding J, Fu W, Gan L, Li Y · 2017Mercury pollution in vegetables, grains and soils from areas surrounding coal-fired power plantsScientific ReportsRead source →

These are observational comparisons from single studies; the size of the difference depends on the site, metal and distance.

Which forms and regions measured lower

For cadmium, the HMI reference median was lowest for eggplant, as sold (10.8 µg/kg) and highest for eggplant, as sold (600 µg/kg); forms differ in water content, so this compares foods as sold or eaten, not uptake.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →5Ahmed TA · 2024EVALUATION OF HEAVY METALS IN A SELECTION OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN VEGETABLES COLLECTED AT THE ERBIL MARKETMalaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 8(2):80-82Read source →14Shivakumar L, Reddy KR, Kalshetty BM · 2020Heavy Metal Contaminations and Health Risk Assessment from Fruits and Vegetables in Bangalore Rural Markets, Karnataka, IndiaRasayan Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2498-2507Read source →15Sultana R, Chamon AS, Mondol MN, Tasnim I · 2021Metal concentration in commonly sold fruit vegetables in Dhaka city market and probable health riskDhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences 30(1):35-47Read source → The HMI reference for lead in eggplant, as sold pools 7 subgroup units from 3 sampling families, with a median of 3,960 µg/kg and a middle half spanning 2,000 (lower quartile) and 102,000 µg/kg (upper quartile).5Ahmed TA · 2024EVALUATION OF HEAVY METALS IN A SELECTION OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN VEGETABLES COLLECTED AT THE ERBIL MARKETMalaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 8(2):80-82Read source →14Shivakumar L, Reddy KR, Kalshetty BM · 2020Heavy Metal Contaminations and Health Risk Assessment from Fruits and Vegetables in Bangalore Rural Markets, Karnataka, IndiaRasayan Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2498-2507Read source →15Sultana R, Chamon AS, Mondol MN, Tasnim I · 2021Metal concentration in commonly sold fruit vegetables in Dhaka city market and probable health riskDhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences 30(1):35-47Read source → For lead in eggplant, cooked, the reference median was below 4 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 4 to below 4 µg/kg across 29 units.2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →10Spungen JH, et al. · 2024Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source → For lead in eggplant, as sold, the reference median was below 7 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 4 to below 7 µg/kg across 24 units.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, eggplant, as sold had the lowest cadmium subgroup median in EMRO (3.91 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (39 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

In one study, lead across 6 groups of eggplant ranged from 260 µg/kg (Sesh More (SM) bazar, occasion 3) to 300 µg/kg (Kamal Ranjit (KR) market, occasion 3); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.16Mostafa F, Goswami C, Chacrabati R · 2023Assessment of lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) contamination in locally available vegetables in MymensinghJournal of Agriculture, Food and Environment 4(4):20-23Read source → In another study, lead across 4 groups of eggplant ranged from 1,200 µg/kg (Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore Rural) to 8,200 µg/kg (Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore Rural); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.14Shivakumar L, Reddy KR, Kalshetty BM · 2020Heavy Metal Contaminations and Health Risk Assessment from Fruits and Vegetables in Bangalore Rural Markets, Karnataka, IndiaRasayan Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2498-2507Read source →

Processing, cooking and preparation

No study in the library measured the same eggplant before and after washing, peeling, drying or cooking for metals, so no processing effect can be stated. Heat does not destroy metals; cooking or drying changes a concentration by moving water or metal, not by removing the element.

Mitigation for eggplant

Controls with evidence for eggplant act at the stages below. Avoid growing cassava on mining waste or contaminated soil (evidence from cassava): cassava grown on mining-influenced soil had lead and arsenic below detection but cadmium at 60 µg/kg, above the EU limit for tropical roots, and nickel at 2,350 µg/kg; it was one of three of nine crops grown there with arsenic below detection.17Romero-Crespo P, Jiménez-Oyola S, Salgado-Almeida B, Zambrano-Anchundia J, Goyburo-Chávez C, González-Valoys A, Higueras P · 2023Trace elements in farmland soils and crops, and probabilistic health risk assessment in areas influenced by mining activity in EcuadorEnvironmental Geochemistry and HealthRead source → Grow corn away from cement plants and other industrial emitters (evidence from corn): maize from the three farms downwind of the plant averaged 230–380 µg/kg lead, against 20 µg/kg at a control farm 18 km upwind; a farm 2.7 km upwind averaged 10 µg/kg.18Abatemi-Usman S, Akindele O, Ayanlade A, Perez M, Attahiru I, Norton G, Feldmann J, Krupp E · 2023Trace elements concentrations in soil contaminate corn in the vicinity of a cement-manufacturing plant: potential health implicationsJournal of Exposure Science & Environmental EpidemiologyRead source →

About this table
ControlMaterialEffectsEvidence
Controls by production stage, retaining all paired analyte outcomes. Seasons and reused guidance do not add independent studies. No effectiveness ranking is implied.
ControlMaterialEffectsEvidence
Avoid growing cassava on mining waste or contaminated soilcultivation · As reportedCassava
Cd · Context
tAs · Context
1

Romero-Crespo et al. 2023

HMI source record · Original source

One dataset family. Linked analytes, repeated seasons and reports are not independent studies.

Effects and comparators

CadmiumAbove the EU 50 µg/kg tropical-root limit (one sample)Root cadmium, fresh weightMining-area cassava versus EU limitCassava root, fresh weightContext · No supported numerical treatment contrast is retained for this finding. A direction, market association, source-selection strategy or guidance statement alone does not establish a percentage change.

Total arsenicBelow detection (<200 µg/kg), as in two other cropsRoot arsenic, fresh weightCassava versus other crops on the same landCassava root, fresh weightContext · No supported numerical treatment contrast is retained for this finding. A direction, market association, source-selection strategy or guidance statement alone does not establish a percentage change.

Cassava against eight other crops from the same orchards and against the EU tropical-root cadmium limit; one cassava sample, June 2021.

How magnitude is classified

HMI editorial magnitude bands: Low is a change greater than 0% and below 25%; Moderate is 25% to below 50%; High is 50% or more, relative to that control’s own comparator. Direction is shown separately. These are descriptive display bands, not validated efficacy cutoffs, occurrence-baseline positions, statistical significance, evidence certainty, safety or net benefit. A range spanning bands retains both labels; a qualitative label has no implied percentage.

Control in context

Cassava grown on mining-influenced soil had lead and arsenic below detection but cadmium at 60 µg/kg, above the EU limit for tropical roots, and nickel at 2,350 µg/kg; it was one of three of nine crops grown there with arsenic below detection.

ContextSelected control
MaterialCassava root from a gold-mining-area orchard, Ponce Enríquez, Ecuador
Stagecultivation
AudienceIngredient suppliers · Brands
PeriodAs reported
ConditionsOne mining district; one cassava sample.
Tested scaleField survey
Sample unitsSource sampling units; no independent intervention units unless stated.
Trade-offsOther metals, yield, taste and cost not quantified unless stated.
VerificationConfirm with lot-specific lead and cadmium results on the form sold, using an adequate quantification limit.

Design, applicability and operating conditions

Observational survey. One mining district; one cassava sample.

One study family.

As reported by the source

Reduces metal reaching or remaining in cassava, or detects it before release.

Source measurements and linked outcomes

AnalytePeriodEffectConverted valuesOriginal means (SD)BasisLocator
Cadmium (Cd)As reportedAbove the EU 50 µg/kg tropical-root limit (one sample)60 → null µg/kgAbsolute values unextractedCassava root, fresh weightTable 2, p. 7
Total arsenic (tAs)As reportedBelow detection (<200 µg/kg), as in two other cropsNumerical baseline not extractedAbsolute values unextractedCassava root, fresh weightTable 2, p. 7

Observational; no siting intervention was tested.

Percentages are calculated from the source means shown in outcomes.

Basis as stated in outcomes; no mass balance reported.

Trade-offs and implementation

Cyanide is outside this table.

Not assessed.

Not assessed.

Not quantified.

Not assessed.

Applicability and verification

One mining district; one cassava sample.

Lot testing.

See source.

Extraction limits and next actions

Unresolved fieldNext action
controlled field or commercial-scale intervention effectNo controlled field or commercial cassava intervention study in the library; keep effects unquantified unless measured.

Provenance and assessment

As disclosed by the source.

Source facts and HMI calculations are distinguished above. These selected source findings do not constitute a systematic review; outcome-level appraisal remains incomplete.

Grow corn away from cement plants and other industrial emitterscultivation · As reportedCorn
Pb · Increased
Pb · Increased
1

Abatemi-Usman et al. 2023

HMI source record · Original source

One dataset family. Linked analytes, repeated seasons and reports are not independent studies.

Effects and comparators

LeadIncreasedDownwind farms higher (observational)Grain lead, dry weightFarm 2.3 km downwind against control farmMaize grain, dry weightHigh · HMI calculates the relative change from the retained source means: (380 − 20) / 20 × 100 = 1800.0%. This is a descriptive contrast of means; no confidence interval or significance test is inferred.

LeadIncreasedDownwind farms higher (observational)Grain lead, dry weightFarm 0.7 km downwind against control farmMaize grain, dry weightHigh · HMI calculates the relative change from the retained source means: (230 − 20) / 20 × 100 = 1050.0%. This is a descriptive contrast of means; no confidence interval or significance test is inferred.

Downwind farms against the upwind control farm, same harvest and method; 12–24 cobs per farm.

How magnitude is classified

HMI editorial magnitude bands: Low is a change greater than 0% and below 25%; Moderate is 25% to below 50%; High is 50% or more, relative to that control’s own comparator. Direction is shown separately. These are descriptive display bands, not validated efficacy cutoffs, occurrence-baseline positions, statistical significance, evidence certainty, safety or net benefit. A range spanning bands retains both labels; a qualitative label has no implied percentage.

Control in context

Maize from the three farms downwind of the plant averaged 230–380 µg/kg lead, against 20 µg/kg at a control farm 18 km upwind; a farm 2.7 km upwind averaged 10 µg/kg.

ContextSelected control
MaterialMaize grain from five farms around a cement plant, Obajana, Kogi State, Nigeria, 2017 harvest
Stagecultivation
AudienceIngredient suppliers · Brands
PeriodAs reported
ConditionsFarmland near a cement plant; wind direction mattered more than distance.
Tested scaleField survey
Sample unitsSource sampling units; no independent intervention units unless stated.
Trade-offsOther metals, yield and cost not quantified unless stated.
VerificationConfirm with lot-specific lead and cadmium results on the form sold, using an adequate quantification limit.

Design, applicability and operating conditions

Observational field survey. Farmland near a cement plant; wind direction mattered more than distance.

One study family.

As reported by the source

Reduces metal reaching corn, or detects it before release.

Source measurements and linked outcomes

AnalytePeriodEffectConverted valuesOriginal means (SD)BasisLocator
Lead (Pb)As reportedDownwind farms higher (observational)20 → 380 µg/kgAbsolute values unextractedMaize grain, dry weightTable 4, p. 5
Lead (Pb)As reportedDownwind farms higher (observational)20 → 230 µg/kgAbsolute values unextractedMaize grain, dry weightTable 4, p. 5

Observational; one plant and harvest.

Differences are read from the source means or medians shown in outcomes.

Basis as stated in outcomes; no mass balance reported.

Trade-offs and implementation

Mycotoxins are outside this table.

Not assessed.

Not assessed.

Not quantified.

Not assessed.

Applicability and verification

Farmland near a cement plant; wind direction mattered more than distance.

Lot testing.

See source.

Extraction limits and next actions

Unresolved fieldNext action
controlled field or commercial-scale intervention effectNo controlled field or commercial corn intervention study in the library; keep effects unquantified unless measured.

Provenance and assessment

As disclosed by the source.

Source facts and HMI calculations are distinguished above. These selected source findings do not constitute a systematic review; outcome-level appraisal remains incomplete.

Intervention evidence

Trade-offs and limits of controls

Avoiding exposed growing areas lowered the metal measured in the studies available, but no study measured the cost or supply effect of doing so.7Li R, Wu H, Ding J, Fu W, Gan L, Li Y · 2017Mercury pollution in vegetables, grains and soils from areas surrounding coal-fired power plantsScientific ReportsRead source → Metals do not move together, so a lot that passes a lead limit says little about cadmium, arsenic or nickel unless those are tested as well.

Testing eggplant for metals

Results depend on the method and its reporting limit. Reporting limits for lead ranged from 0.5 µg/kg (Al-Salimi et al. 2026) to 3,000 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →19Al-Salimi MSS, Saeed AAM, Bin Yahia AA · 2026Lead and trace element contamination in market vegetables of Aden, Yemen: a human health risk assessmentDiscover Chemistry (2026) 3:83Read source → Reporting limits for cadmium ranged from 0.1 µg/kg (Al-Salimi et al. 2026) to 10 µg/kg (Liang et al. 2019), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.11Liang G, Gong W, Li B, Zuo J, Pan L, Liu X · 2019Analysis of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs and an Assessment of the Health Risks to the General Public via Consumption in Beijing, ChinaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthRead source →19Al-Salimi MSS, Saeed AAM, Bin Yahia AA · 2026Lead and trace element contamination in market vegetables of Aden, Yemen: a human health risk assessmentDiscover Chemistry (2026) 3:83Read source → Reporting limits for total arsenic ranged from 0.4 µg/kg (Liang et al. 2019) to 3 µg/kg (FDA Total Diet Study), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →11Liang G, Gong W, Li B, Zuo J, Pan L, Liu X · 2019Analysis of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs and an Assessment of the Health Risks to the General Public via Consumption in Beijing, ChinaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthRead source →

A useful lot result names the form, the basis and a quantification limit well below the limit that applies.

Buying and verifying eggplant

No maximum level for metals in eggplant was verified from primary text for this page; buyers should confirm the limit that applies in the destination market.

Exposure from eggplant

No source in the library converted eggplant concentrations into a verified estimate of intake for a defined population. Concentrations describe the food, not individual risk.

Evidence review and remaining gaps

Every source record that names eggplant was decided on its content: 27 occurrence extracted, 27 records in all. The occurrence table renders every extracted result; held values remain visible with their reason.

References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.

Eggplant FAQs

What heavy metals are found in eggplant?

The library reports lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, monomethylarsonic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ag, As, B, Ba, Hg, Mo, Sr and Ti in eggplant, most often lead, cadmium and total arsenic.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2022FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Guerra F, Trevizam AR, Muraoka T, Marcante NC, Canniatti-Brazaca SG · 2012Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →4Kawsar Hossen, Nahian Rahman, Zannatul Ferdowsi, Tahmina Ferdous · 2026Assessment of heavy metal levels and associated health risks linked to vegetables grown in Noakhali region of BangladeshEnvironmental Health InsightsRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in eggplant, as sold from 244 results in 3 reporting regions, with a subgroup median of 5 µg/kg.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

How do heavy metals get into eggplant?

In the studies available, eggplant from contaminated or exposed settings carried more metal than eggplant from the same study’s control.7Li R, Wu H, Ding J, Fu W, Gan L, Li Y · 2017Mercury pollution in vegetables, grains and soils from areas surrounding coal-fired power plantsScientific ReportsRead source → Eggplant, as sold from Location A1 (industrial-affected area) had total mercury higher at 42.4 µg/kg, against 0.43 µg/kg for Control (grocery store >55 km from any power plant) in the same study.7Li R, Wu H, Ding J, Fu W, Gan L, Li Y · 2017Mercury pollution in vegetables, grains and soils from areas surrounding coal-fired power plantsScientific ReportsRead source →

Which types of eggplant have the lowest levels?

For cadmium, the HMI reference median was lowest for eggplant, as sold (10.8 µg/kg) and highest for eggplant, as sold (600 µg/kg); forms differ in water content, so this compares foods as sold or eaten, not uptake.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →5Ahmed TA · 2024EVALUATION OF HEAVY METALS IN A SELECTION OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN VEGETABLES COLLECTED AT THE ERBIL MARKETMalaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 8(2):80-82Read source →14Shivakumar L, Reddy KR, Kalshetty BM · 2020Heavy Metal Contaminations and Health Risk Assessment from Fruits and Vegetables in Bangalore Rural Markets, Karnataka, IndiaRasayan Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2498-2507Read source →15Sultana R, Chamon AS, Mondol MN, Tasnim I · 2021Metal concentration in commonly sold fruit vegetables in Dhaka city market and probable health riskDhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences 30(1):35-47Read source →

Which regions report the lowest levels in eggplant?

Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, eggplant, as sold had the lowest cadmium subgroup median in EMRO (3.91 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (39 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →

How much of the arsenic in eggplant is inorganic?

Inorganic arsenic, the more toxic form, was measured in 5 results from 3 sources, far fewer than total arsenic.1World Health Organization · 2026GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →20Laizu J · 2007Speciation of arsenic in vegetables and their correlation with inorganic phosphate levelBangladesh Journal of Pharmacology 2007; 2: 88-94Read source →21Centre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR · 2012The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source → Laizu 2007 reported inorganic arsenic at 800 µg/kg (mean ± 1,000 SD) in eggplant, as sold from fruiting vegetables, local market, Dhaka.20Laizu J · 2007Speciation of arsenic in vegetables and their correlation with inorganic phosphate levelBangladesh Journal of Pharmacology 2007; 2: 88-94Read source →

References

Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.

  1. GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsWorld Health Organization · GEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment Programme · 2026 · extranet.who.intDataset
  2. FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsU.S. Food and Drug Administration · FDA Total Diet Study · 2022 · www.fda.govDataset
  3. Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthGuerra F, Trevizam AR, Muraoka T, Marcante NC, and Canniatti-Brazaca SG · Scientia Agricola 69(1):54-60 · 2012 · doi.org/10.1590/s0103-90162012000100008Peer-reviewed
  4. Assessment of heavy metal levels and associated health risks linked to vegetables grown in Noakhali region of BangladeshKawsar Hossen, Nahian Rahman, Zannatul Ferdowsi, and Tahmina Ferdous · Environmental Health Insights · 2026 · doi.org/10.1177/11786302261440637Peer-reviewed
  5. EVALUATION OF HEAVY METALS IN A SELECTION OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN VEGETABLES COLLECTED AT THE ERBIL MARKETAhmed TA · Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 8(2):80-82 · 2024 · doi.org/10.26480/mjsa.02.2024.80.82Peer-reviewed
  6. Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakeAl Othman ZA · Molecules 2010, 15, 7482-7497 · 2010 · doi.org/10.3390/molecules15107482Peer-reviewed
  7. Mercury pollution in vegetables, grains and soils from areas surrounding coal-fired power plantsLi R, Wu H, Ding J, Fu W, Gan L, and Li Y · Scientific Reports · 2017 · doi.org/10.1038/srep46545Peer-reviewed
  8. Concentration and Potential Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Risk Assessment of Metals in Locally Grown VegetablesSaleem M, Wang Y, Pierce D, Sens DA, Somji S, and Garrett SH · Foods · 2025 · doi.org/10.3390/foods14132264Peer-reviewed
  9. Assessment of Heavy Metals in Some Local and Imported Vegetables in Erbil MarketYounis AM and Darwesh DA · Kirkuk Journal of Science 18(4):54-64 · 2023 · doi.org/10.32894/kujss.2023.142386.1112Peer-reviewed
  10. Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Spungen JH and et al. · Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A · 2024 · doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2024.2396910Peer-reviewed
  11. Analysis of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs and an Assessment of the Health Risks to the General Public via Consumption in Beijing, ChinaLiang G, Gong W, Li B, Zuo J, Pan L, and Liu X · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2019 · doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16060909Peer-reviewed
  12. Determination of some heavy metals and their potential risk in selected vegetables on sale within Kaduna Metropolis, Kaduna State, NigeriaImongben CO, Tomori WB, Umoru PE, and Oyerinde WA · World Nutrition · 2026 · doi.org/10.26596/wn.20261718-18Peer-reviewed
  13. Estimation of Heavy Metals and Associated Health Risk in Selected Vegetables Grown in Peri-Urban Areas of Multan and Rawalpindi, PakistanWadood SA, Sharif MK, Ashraf MN, Ejaz R, Kosar G, Azeem M, et al. · Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research Series B: Biological Sciences 64B(1): 55-63 (2021) · 2021 · doi.org/10.52763/pjsir.biol.sci.64.1.2021.55.63Peer-reviewed
  14. Heavy Metal Contaminations and Health Risk Assessment from Fruits and Vegetables in Bangalore Rural Markets, Karnataka, IndiaShivakumar L, Reddy KR, and Kalshetty BM · Rasayan Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2498-2507 · 2020 · doi.org/10.31788/rjc.2020.1346039Peer-reviewed
  15. Metal concentration in commonly sold fruit vegetables in Dhaka city market and probable health riskSultana R, Chamon AS, Mondol MN, and Tasnim I · Dhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences 30(1):35-47 · 2021 · doi.org/10.3329/dujbs.v30i1.51807Peer-reviewed
  16. Assessment of lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) contamination in locally available vegetables in MymensinghMostafa F, Goswami C, and Chacrabati R · Journal of Agriculture, Food and Environment 4(4):20-23 · 2023 · doi.org/10.47440/jafe.2023.4404Peer-reviewed
  17. Trace elements in farmland soils and crops, and probabilistic health risk assessment in areas influenced by mining activity in EcuadorRomero-Crespo P, Jiménez-Oyola S, Salgado-Almeida B, Zambrano-Anchundia J, Goyburo-Chávez C, González-Valoys A, et al. · Environmental Geochemistry and Health · 2023 · doi.org/10.1007/s10653-023-01514-xPeer-reviewed
  18. Trace elements concentrations in soil contaminate corn in the vicinity of a cement-manufacturing plant: potential health implicationsAbatemi-Usman S, Akindele O, Ayanlade A, Perez M, Attahiru I, Norton G, et al. · Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology · 2023 · doi.org/10.1038/s41370-023-00548-8Peer-reviewed
  19. Lead and trace element contamination in market vegetables of Aden, Yemen: a human health risk assessmentAl-Salimi MSS, Saeed AAM, and Bin Yahia AA · Discover Chemistry (2026) 3:83 · 2026 · doi.org/10.1007/s44371-026-00553-4Peer-reviewed
  20. Speciation of arsenic in vegetables and their correlation with inorganic phosphate levelLaizu J · Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology 2007; 2: 88-94 · 2007 · doi.org/10.3329/bjp.v2i2.576Peer-reviewed
  21. The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR · Centre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region · 2012 · www.cfs.gov.hkGovernment

Sources

Browse Eggplant Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.

Update history

22 October 2026: Rebuilt from every eggplant record in the library: 27 occurrence sources, references by form and basis, same-study contrasts and stage-led controls.