Eggplant in the HMI library has 303 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, monomethylarsonic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ag, arsenic (As), B, Ba, mercury (Hg), Mo, Sr and Ti from 27 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →4Assessment of heavy metal levels and associated health risks linked to vegetables grown in Noakhali region of BangladeshEnvironmental Health InsightsRead source →5EVALUATION OF HEAVY METALS IN A SELECTION OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN VEGETABLES COLLECTED AT THE ERBIL MARKETMalaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 8(2):80-82Read source →6Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakeMolecules 2010, 15, 7482-7497Read source →
-
Metals measured:
Lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid and monomethylarsonic acid and others, in 303 results from 27 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →4Assessment of heavy metal levels and associated health risks linked to vegetables grown in Noakhali region of BangladeshEnvironmental Health InsightsRead source →
-
Main drivers:
Eggplant, as sold from Location A1 (industrial-affected area) had total mercury higher at 42.4 µg/kg, against 0.43 µg/kg for Control (grocery store >55 km from any power plant) in the same study.7Mercury pollution in vegetables, grains and soils from areas surrounding coal-fired power plantsScientific ReportsRead source →
-
Practical framing:
Ask for lot results with a quantification limit well below the limit that applies in the destination market.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →4Assessment of heavy metal levels and associated health risks linked to vegetables grown in Noakhali region of BangladeshEnvironmental Health InsightsRead source →
Eggplant overview
Eggplant in the HMI library has 303 reported results for lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, monomethylarsonic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ag, As, B, Ba, Hg, Mo, Sr and Ti from 27 sources.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →4Assessment of heavy metal levels and associated health risks linked to vegetables grown in Noakhali region of BangladeshEnvironmental Health InsightsRead source →5EVALUATION OF HEAVY METALS IN A SELECTION OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN VEGETABLES COLLECTED AT THE ERBIL MARKETMalaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 8(2):80-82Read source →6Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakeMolecules 2010, 15, 7482-7497Read source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in eggplant, as sold from 244 results in 3 reporting regions, with a subgroup median of 5 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source → In the US Total Diet Study, eggplant, cooked had a median lead result below 4 µg/kg across 6 composites from 2017–2018.2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →
Across 8 other studies of ordinary farms and markets, reported lead means and medians on a dry-weight basis ranged from 10 µg/kg (Saleem et al. 2025) to 62,500 µg/kg (Younis et al. 2023).8Concentration and Potential Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Risk Assessment of Metals in Locally Grown VegetablesFoodsRead source →9Assessment of Heavy Metals in Some Local and Imported Vegetables in Erbil MarketKirkuk Journal of Science 18(4):54-64Read source → For cadmium, 2 studies on an as-sold or fresh-weight basis reported means and medians from 11 µg/kg (Spungen et al. 2024) to 40 µg/kg (Guerra et al. 2012).3Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →10Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source → Higher results came from contaminated or exposed settings rather than ordinary supply. Eggplant, as sold from Location B1 (industrial-affected area) had total mercury higher at 43.4 µg/kg, against 0.43 µg/kg for Control (grocery store >55 km from any power plant) in the same study.7Mercury pollution in vegetables, grains and soils from areas surrounding coal-fired power plantsScientific ReportsRead source →
For a buyer the practical points are the form bought, the basis a result is reported on, where the eggplant came from and the laboratory’s reporting limit. Testing finds contamination but does not remove it.
What counts as eggplant
This page covers eggplant in 2 forms kept separate in every comparison: eggplant, as sold (285 results) and eggplant, cooked (18 results).1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →4Assessment of heavy metal levels and associated health risks linked to vegetables grown in Noakhali region of BangladeshEnvironmental Health InsightsRead source →5EVALUATION OF HEAVY METALS IN A SELECTION OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN VEGETABLES COLLECTED AT THE ERBIL MARKETMalaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 8(2):80-82Read source →6Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakeMolecules 2010, 15, 7482-7497Read source →
Results stay on the basis each source reports: as sold or fresh weight, dry weight, or unstated. Dry-weight, as-sold and unstated results are never pooled, and no moisture conversion is applied.
Heavy metal contamination profile of eggplant
The table holds every extracted eggplant result: one row for each statistic a source reports for a form, group and metal, 303 rows in all, grouped by metal and form; percentiles, ranges and maxima for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →4Assessment of heavy metal levels and associated health risks linked to vegetables grown in Noakhali region of BangladeshEnvironmental Health InsightsRead source →5EVALUATION OF HEAVY METALS IN A SELECTION OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN VEGETABLES COLLECTED AT THE ERBIL MARKETMalaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 8(2):80-82Read source →6Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakeMolecules 2010, 15, 7482-7497Read source → Monitoring medians are HMI calculations from individual submissions; non-detects remain intervals between zero and the reporting limit and are never read as zero.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
165 rows can be rated against an HMI reference for the same form and basis, 6 rows have a direct same-study comparison, and the rest stay unrated with the reason recorded. 13 values from 4 sources failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.4Assessment of heavy metal levels and associated health risks linked to vegetables grown in Noakhali region of BangladeshEnvironmental Health InsightsRead source →11Analysis of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs and an Assessment of the Health Risks to the General Public via Consumption in Beijing, ChinaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthRead source →12Determination of some heavy metals and their potential risk in selected vegetables on sale within Kaduna Metropolis, Kaduna State, NigeriaWorld NutritionRead source →13Estimation of Heavy Metals and Associated Health Risk in Selected Vegetables Grown in Peri-Urban Areas of Multan and Rawalpindi, PakistanPakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research Series B: Biological Sciences 64B(1): 55-63 (2021)Read source →
Comparison methods and scope
Each row is one statistic a source reports for one form of eggplant, group and metal; percentiles, ranges and maxima reported for the same samples as a mean or median are shown on that row. Different forms and preparation states are kept apart, and dry-weight results never share a reference with as-sold or fresh-weight results. Ratings place a result against an HMI reference built from monitoring results and ordinary-setting medians for the same form and basis. Same-study contrasts compare a contaminated or treated site with its control, targeted with random sampling, a prepared form with the unprocessed one, or one group of a study with the median of its other groups. Held rows failed a check against their own source and are shown but not compared.
First displayed analyte: Lead: 50 findings from 22 sources. Each row retains its statistic and measurement basis.
Filter findings
299 of 299 findings · 28 analytes
About this table
| Food form | Collection scope | Finding (µg/kg) | Comparison | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
46 findings · 20 studies | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2016–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2000–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2014–2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | SEARO2012As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2013As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldHossen et al. 2026 | farm 12024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAhmed 2024 | imported vegetables, Erbil marketCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAhmed 2024 | local vegetables, Erbil marketCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAl 2010 | Vegetables, Riyadh city markets, May 20092009 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026 | fruiting vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group II2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldIessa et al. 2024 | fruit vegetable, Sebha local market, 20232023 | not detected. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldLiang et al. 2019 | Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023 | Kamal Ranjit (KR) market, all occasionsCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023 | Kamal Ranjit (KR) market, occasion 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023 | Kamal Ranjit (KR) market, occasion 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023 | Kamal Ranjit (KR) market, occasion 3Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023 | Sesh More (SM) bazar, all occasionsCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023 | Sesh More (SM) bazar, occasion 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023 | Sesh More (SM) bazar, occasion 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023 | Sesh More (SM) bazar, occasion 3Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRani et al. 2025 | fruit vegetable2017–2018 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | local market2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | all four phases, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 1, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 2, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 3, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 4, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWadood et al. 2021 | peri-urban markets, Multan regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023 | imported, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023 | locally grown, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAbbas et al. 2010 | fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
4 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 5 collection regions2017–2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2018–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Eggplant, cookedSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
| Eggplant, cookedSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020As sold / fresh | not detected. | ||
44 findings · 20 studies | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | EMRO2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2003–2017As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | PAHO2015–2016As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldHossen et al. 2026 | farm 12024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAhmed 2024 | imported vegetables, Erbil marketCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAhmed 2024 | local vegetables, Erbil marketCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026 | fruiting vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group II2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldIessa et al. 2024 | fruit vegetable, Sebha local market, 20232023 | not detected. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldLiang et al. 2019 | Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023 | Kamal Ranjit (KR) market, all occasionsCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023 | Kamal Ranjit (KR) market, occasion 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023 | Kamal Ranjit (KR) market, occasion 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023 | Kamal Ranjit (KR) market, occasion 3Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023 | Sesh More (SM) bazar, all occasionsCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023 | Sesh More (SM) bazar, occasion 1Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023 | Sesh More (SM) bazar, occasion 2Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldMostafa et al. 2023 | Sesh More (SM) bazar, occasion 3Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRani et al. 2025 | fruit vegetable2017–2018 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | local market2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | all four phases, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 1, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 2, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 3, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 4, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWadood et al. 2021 | peri-urban markets, Multan regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023 | imported, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023 | locally grown, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAbbas et al. 2010 | fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives 2022 | GEMS/Food contaminants database2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
4 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 5 collection regions2017–2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2018–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Eggplant, cookedSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, cookedSpungen et al. 2024 | all samples2018–2020As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
19 findings · 9 studies · 1 spread figure folded in | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldHossen et al. 2026 | farm 12024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 7,200 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Eggplant, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group II2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldLiang et al. 2019 | Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | local market2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023 | imported, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023 | locally grown, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAbbas et al. 2010 | fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 5 collection regions2017–2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2018–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
4 findings · 3 studies · 1 spread figure folded in | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 3,000 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Eggplant, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldCentre for Food Safety FEHD HKSAR 2012 | all samples (4 sampling occasions, composites)2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study · 1 spread figure folded in | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 4,400 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Eggplant, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
2 findings · 1 study · 1 spread figure folded in | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | mean.Same samples: 1,900 µg/kg (maximum) | ||
| Eggplant, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | min. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldLaizu 2007 | fruiting vegetables, local market, DhakaCollection date unreportedAs sold / fresh | max. | ||
13 findings · 4 studies | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldLi et al. 2017 | Control (grocery store >55 km from any power plant)2015As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldLi et al. 2017 | Location A12015As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldLi et al. 2017 | Location A22015As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldLi et al. 2017 | Location B12015As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldLi et al. 2017 | Location B22015As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldLi et al. 2017 | Location B32015As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldLi et al. 2017 | Location B42015As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldLiang et al. 2019 | Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAbbas et al. 2010 | fruits vegetables2007–2008Basis not stated | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 5 collection regions2017–2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2018–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
18 findings · 10 studies | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group II2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRani et al. 2025 | fruit vegetable2017–2018 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | local market2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | all four phases, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 1, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 2, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 3, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 4, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWadood et al. 2021 | peri-urban markets, Multan regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023 | imported, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023 | locally grown, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 5 collection regions2017–2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2018–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
24 findings · 13 studies | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldHossen et al. 2026 | farm 12024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group II2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldIessa et al. 2024 | fruit vegetable, Sebha local market, 20232023 | not detected. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldLiang et al. 2019 | Beijing, four sampling sites pooledCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRani et al. 2025 | fruit vegetable2017–2018 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | local market2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | all four phases, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 1, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 2, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 3, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 4, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWadood et al. 2021 | peri-urban markets, Multan regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023 | imported, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023 | locally grown, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 5 collection regions2017–2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2018–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
8 findings · 5 studies | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group II2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRani et al. 2025 | fruit vegetable2017–2018 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023 | imported, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023 | locally grown, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020 | all samples (both areas)2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Other (non-Songhua) area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWang et al. 2020 | Songhua River basin area2015–2016Basis not stated | mean. | ||
2 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldWHO GEMS/Food | WPRO2010–2011As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | not detected. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 5 collection regions2017–2018As sold / fresh | median. | ||
| Eggplant, cookedFDA Total Diet Study | 6 collection regions2018–2020As sold / fresh | median. | ||
9 findings · 6 studies | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldGuerra et al. 2012 | CEAGESP wholesale market2009As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group II2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRani et al. 2025 | fruit vegetable2017–2018 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | local market2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
20 findings · 10 studies | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldHossen et al. 2026 | farm 12024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026 | fruiting vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group II2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldIessa et al. 2024 | fruit vegetable, Sebha local market, 20232023 | not detected. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRani et al. 2025 | fruit vegetable2017–2018 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | local market2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Devanahalli taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Hosakote taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldShivakumar et al. 2020 | Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore RuralCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | all four phases, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 1, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 2, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 3, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 4, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
14 findings · 9 studies | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldHossen et al. 2026 | farm 12024As sold / fresh | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026 | fruiting vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group II2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRani et al. 2025 | fruit vegetable2017–2018 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | all four phases, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 1, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 2, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 3, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 4, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWadood et al. 2021 | peri-urban markets, Multan regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023 | imported, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023 | locally grown, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
14 findings · 8 studies | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldAhmed 2024 | imported vegetables, Erbil marketCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAhmed 2024 | local vegetables, Erbil marketCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group II2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRani et al. 2025 | fruit vegetable2017–2018 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | all four phases, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 1, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 2, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 3, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 4, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWadood et al. 2021 | peri-urban markets, Multan regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023 | imported, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023 | locally grown, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
19 findings · 10 studies | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldAhmed 2024 | imported vegetables, Erbil marketCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAhmed 2024 | local vegetables, Erbil marketCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAl-Salimi et al. 2026 | fruiting vegetables, Crater-Aden central marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group II2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRani et al. 2025 | fruit vegetable2017–2018 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | local market2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | all four phases, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 1, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 2, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 3, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldSultana et al. 2021 | sampling phase 4, Kawran Bazar, DhakaCollection date unreported | sample value. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldWadood et al. 2021 | peri-urban markets, Multan regionCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023 | imported, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023 | locally grown, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
2 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group II2021–2022 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldCentre for Food Safety (Hong Kong) 2013 | all samples2010–2011Basis not stated | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
2 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023 | imported, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldYounis et al. 2023 | locally grown, Erbil main vegetable marketCollection date unreported | not detected. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
4 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | local market2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
4 findings · 1 study | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | local market2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldSaleem et al. 2025 | all samplesCollection date unreported | mean. | ||
5 findings · 2 studies | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldImongben et al. 2026 | five Kaduna markets (composite per market)Collection date unreported | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | local market2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | mining-area garden (Nerva / Minas de Riotinto)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | peri-urban garden (Utrera)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
| Eggplant, as soldRossini-Oliva et al. 2024 | urban garden (Huelva, Cordoba, Seville, Alcala de Guadaira)2021–2023 | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group II2021–2022 | mean. | ||
1 finding · 1 study | ||||
| Eggplant, as soldAltıkulaç et al. 2025 | Group II2021–2022 | mean. | ||
Shared dataset methods and interpretation
Source summaries retain their original statistic, material, basis and censoring. Each source drawer identifies methods and overlapping samples. No matched reference or pooled distribution is inferred.
HMI eggplant Pb reference · Eggplant, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI eggplant Pb reference · Eggplant, as sold. Eggplant, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤4 | ≤7 | ≤7 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤5 | ≤7 | ≤7 |
24 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 24 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, as sold on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-dbbf875b27c9:8ea15cf0b424
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI eggplant Pb reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI eggplant Pb reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight. Eggplant, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 2000 | 3960 | 102000 |
| Alternative weighting | 2000 | 3960 | 102000 |
7 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Ahmed 2024 | 2 | 33% |
| Shivakumar et al. 2020 | 4 | 33% |
| Sultana et al. 2021 | 1 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-787f103cd2de:74b686e10514
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI eggplant Pb reference · Eggplant, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI eggplant Pb reference · Eggplant, cooked. Eggplant, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤4 | ≤4 | ≤4 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤4 | ≤4 | ≤4 |
29 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 50% |
| Spungen et al. 2024 | 2 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-213f74523486:d7368e9b784c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI eggplant Cd reference · Eggplant, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI eggplant Cd reference · Eggplant, as sold. Eggplant, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 6 | 10.8 | 13.5 |
| Alternative weighting | 6 | 10.8 | 13.5 |
18 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 18 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, as sold on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-c59ebf2d0603:c415c131ce1b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI eggplant Cd reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI eggplant Cd reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight. Eggplant, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 80.5 | 600 | 7000 |
| Alternative weighting | 80.5 | 600 | 7000 |
8 reference units; 3 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Ahmed 2024 | 2 | 33% |
| Shivakumar et al. 2020 | 4 | 33% |
| Sultana et al. 2021 | 2 | 33% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
3 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-d5ee6223f1c2:bd9f7842d33a
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI eggplant Cd reference · Eggplant, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI eggplant Cd reference · Eggplant, cooked. Eggplant, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 6.9 | 11 | 15 |
| Alternative weighting | 7.2 | 11.5 | 15 |
27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, cooked on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-39e3efcd9893:5c5687fc7016
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI eggplant tAs reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI eggplant tAs reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight. Eggplant, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 38 | 72 | 198 |
| Alternative weighting | 38 | 72 | 198 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Shivakumar et al. 2020 | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Shivakumar et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, as sold on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-e9db81406b20:69c4fe34b443
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI eggplant tAs reference · Eggplant, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI eggplant tAs reference · Eggplant, cooked. Eggplant, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤3 | 7.4 | 11 |
| Alternative weighting | 3.4 | 7.5 | 11 |
27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, cooked on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-cb9315112154:9eaa54148ddd
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI eggplant iAs reference · Eggplant, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI eggplant iAs reference · Eggplant, as sold. Eggplant, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤3 | 1.5–3 (bounded) | 3 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤3 | 1.5–3 (bounded) | 3 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, as sold on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-5e04ab8048a7:b2cb50835e3b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI eggplant tHg reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI eggplant tHg reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight. Eggplant, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 25.5 | 31 | 1670 |
| Alternative weighting | 25.5 | 31 | 1670 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Shivakumar et al. 2020 | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Shivakumar et al. 2020 is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, as sold on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-720528a1ddbd:64b3d3e7d7a3
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI eggplant tHg reference · Eggplant, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI eggplant tHg reference · Eggplant, cooked. Eggplant, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, cooked on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-07814cadaa62:72fcfd40b72b
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI eggplant Ni reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI eggplant Ni reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight. Eggplant, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1700 | 1950 | 2200 |
| Alternative weighting | 1700 | 1950 | 2200 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Sultana et al. 2021 | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Sultana et al. 2021 is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, as sold on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-19a3dd873ba1:02a2f0076cd3
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI eggplant Ni reference · Eggplant, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI eggplant Ni reference · Eggplant, cooked. Eggplant, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤40 | ≤40 | ≤40 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤40 | ≤40 | ≤40 |
27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, cooked on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-1fc3c91f36af:83a08732176e
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI eggplant Cr reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI eggplant Cr reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight. Eggplant, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 1210 | 3030 | 5600 |
| Alternative weighting | 1210 | 3030 | 5600 |
7 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Shivakumar et al. 2020 | 4 | 50% |
| Sultana et al. 2021 | 3 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-31bfa5c5247c:9c6e249656b7
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI eggplant Cr reference · Eggplant, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI eggplant Cr reference · Eggplant, cooked. Eggplant, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤50 | ≤50 | ≤50 |
27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, cooked on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-30feca7a5b2a:c0ecd2d364b7
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI eggplant Sn reference · Eggplant, as sold
Reference and scope
HMI eggplant Sn reference · Eggplant, as sold. Eggplant, as sold; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤10 | ≤10 | ≤10 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤10 | ≤10 | ≤10 |
2 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| WHO GEMS/Food | 2 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
WHO GEMS/Food is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, as sold on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-3de65b587c56:fd32c7cd527c
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI eggplant U reference · Eggplant, cooked
Reference and scope
HMI eggplant U reference · Eggplant, cooked. Eggplant, cooked; As sold, as eaten or fresh weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
| Alternative weighting | ≤1 | ≤1 | ≤1 |
27 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| FDA Total Diet Study | 27 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, cooked on a as sold, as eaten or fresh weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
FDA Total Diet Study is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, cooked on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-e238fc3212e7:2bdea0bffc98
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI eggplant Cu reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI eggplant Cu reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight. Eggplant, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 3800 | 13300 | 18300 |
| Alternative weighting | 3800 | 13300 | 18300 |
8 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Shivakumar et al. 2020 | 4 | 50% |
| Sultana et al. 2021 | 4 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-2928b73cd5ed:b48cd3007555
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI eggplant Fe reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI eggplant Fe reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight. Eggplant, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 46800 | 77100 | 154000 |
| Alternative weighting | 46800 | 77100 | 154000 |
4 reference units; 1 sampling family. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Sultana et al. 2021 | 4 | 100% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
Sultana et al. 2021 is the only compatible sampling family for eggplant, as sold on this basis in the completed eggplant ledger, so this single-family reference cannot represent other markets. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-f3e74d949586:d8eb98e788c5
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI eggplant Mn reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI eggplant Mn reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight. Eggplant, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 19700 | 28200 | 30000 |
| Alternative weighting | 19700 | 28200 | 30000 |
6 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Ahmed 2024 | 2 | 50% |
| Sultana et al. 2021 | 4 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-aaee766f9fbc:dd443c58ee38
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
HMI eggplant Zn reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight
Reference and scope
HMI eggplant Zn reference · Eggplant, as sold, dry weight. Eggplant, as sold; Dry weight, µg/kg; no moisture conversion. Distribution of subgroup median concentration values.
| Reference (µg/kg) | Q1 | Median | Q3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary HMI reference | 21100 | 41500 | 53500 |
| Alternative weighting | 21100 | 41500 | 53500 |
6 reference units; 2 sampling families. Counts describe evidence units, not independent studies or certainty.
| Contributing family | Reference units | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Ahmed 2024 | 2 | 50% |
| Sultana et al. 2021 | 4 | 50% |
Methods
HMI pools subgroup medians for eggplant, as sold on a dry weight basis: monitoring results summarized as one median per reporting region, sampling type and collection year, total diet composites and printed sample values as single observations, and printed subgroup medians from ordinary farms or markets. Each sampling family has equal total weight. Non-detects stay as zero-to-limit intervals, so quartiles carry lower and upper bounds. Means, ranges and maxima never enter as observations. Other forms, other bases, targeted sampling and results from mining, industrial, wastewater-affected, experimental, fertiliser or manufacturer settings are kept out of this reference.
Inverse weighted empirical CDF; midpoint at exact cumulative-weight boundaries. At least four reference units and a definitely positive Q1–Q3 spread are required. This is a display eligibility rule, not statistical validation.
Limitations
2 sampling families with different designs; none is a probability sample of world supply. Reporting regions and purchase markets are not growing areas. Non-detects with differing limits widen the bounds. A position is descriptive concentration, not a safety or compliance judgment.
Admitted source families
Reference version and interpretation
Frozen evidence selection: 2026-10-22. Method: hmi-pooled-reference-v2.
hmi-pooled-reference-v2:eggplant-57ad22fbd608:46ecd78732d9
The reference is computed by HMI from admitted evidence, not copied from a study baseline. It describes the evidence currently in this scope; it is not a worldwide or current-lot benchmark. Source, year and region filters do not change it. Different HMI scopes are not one common ranking.
The source reports only a percentile, range or maximum for these samples, with no mean or median to place against the reference. Spread figures that do have a mean or median are shown on that row instead.
The value could not be reconciled with its own paper, so it is shown but not compared.
The result is below a reporting limit, and the range from zero to that limit crosses more than one band.
No medians or sample values exist for this form and metal, so no HMI reference could be built.
The HMI reference for this form has fewer than four units or no measurable spread, below the display minimum.
The result is on a basis (dry weight, or not stated) that no HMI reference for this form uses, so it cannot be placed.
No findings match these filters. Change the selection or reset to show all source findings.
How metals reach eggplant
The evidence on how metals reach eggplant comes from studies that compared exposed and ordinary settings. Eggplant, as sold from Location B1 (industrial-affected area) had total mercury higher at 43.4 µg/kg, against 0.43 µg/kg for Control (grocery store >55 km from any power plant) in the same study.7Mercury pollution in vegetables, grains and soils from areas surrounding coal-fired power plantsScientific ReportsRead source →
These are observational comparisons from single studies; the size of the difference depends on the site, metal and distance.
Which forms and regions measured lower
For cadmium, the HMI reference median was lowest for eggplant, as sold (10.8 µg/kg) and highest for eggplant, as sold (600 µg/kg); forms differ in water content, so this compares foods as sold or eaten, not uptake.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →5EVALUATION OF HEAVY METALS IN A SELECTION OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN VEGETABLES COLLECTED AT THE ERBIL MARKETMalaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 8(2):80-82Read source →14Heavy Metal Contaminations and Health Risk Assessment from Fruits and Vegetables in Bangalore Rural Markets, Karnataka, IndiaRasayan Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2498-2507Read source →15Metal concentration in commonly sold fruit vegetables in Dhaka city market and probable health riskDhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences 30(1):35-47Read source → The HMI reference for lead in eggplant, as sold pools 7 subgroup units from 3 sampling families, with a median of 3,960 µg/kg and a middle half spanning 2,000 (lower quartile) and 102,000 µg/kg (upper quartile).5EVALUATION OF HEAVY METALS IN A SELECTION OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN VEGETABLES COLLECTED AT THE ERBIL MARKETMalaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 8(2):80-82Read source →14Heavy Metal Contaminations and Health Risk Assessment from Fruits and Vegetables in Bangalore Rural Markets, Karnataka, IndiaRasayan Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2498-2507Read source →15Metal concentration in commonly sold fruit vegetables in Dhaka city market and probable health riskDhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences 30(1):35-47Read source → For lead in eggplant, cooked, the reference median was below 4 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 4 to below 4 µg/kg across 29 units.2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →10Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Food Additives & Contaminants: Part ARead source → For lead in eggplant, as sold, the reference median was below 7 µg/kg, with a middle half from below 4 to below 7 µg/kg across 24 units.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, eggplant, as sold had the lowest cadmium subgroup median in EMRO (3.91 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (39 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
In one study, lead across 6 groups of eggplant ranged from 260 µg/kg (Sesh More (SM) bazar, occasion 3) to 300 µg/kg (Kamal Ranjit (KR) market, occasion 3); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.16Assessment of lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) contamination in locally available vegetables in MymensinghJournal of Agriculture, Food and Environment 4(4):20-23Read source → In another study, lead across 4 groups of eggplant ranged from 1,200 µg/kg (Nelamangala taluk market, Bangalore Rural) to 8,200 µg/kg (Doddaballapura taluk market, Bangalore Rural); the lowest is the lowest observed in that study, not an established sourcing preference.14Heavy Metal Contaminations and Health Risk Assessment from Fruits and Vegetables in Bangalore Rural Markets, Karnataka, IndiaRasayan Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2498-2507Read source →
Processing, cooking and preparation
No study in the library measured the same eggplant before and after washing, peeling, drying or cooking for metals, so no processing effect can be stated. Heat does not destroy metals; cooking or drying changes a concentration by moving water or metal, not by removing the element.
Mitigation for eggplant
Controls with evidence for eggplant act at the stages below. Avoid growing cassava on mining waste or contaminated soil (evidence from cassava): cassava grown on mining-influenced soil had lead and arsenic below detection but cadmium at 60 µg/kg, above the EU limit for tropical roots, and nickel at 2,350 µg/kg; it was one of three of nine crops grown there with arsenic below detection.17Trace elements in farmland soils and crops, and probabilistic health risk assessment in areas influenced by mining activity in EcuadorEnvironmental Geochemistry and HealthRead source → Grow corn away from cement plants and other industrial emitters (evidence from corn): maize from the three farms downwind of the plant averaged 230–380 µg/kg lead, against 20 µg/kg at a control farm 18 km upwind; a farm 2.7 km upwind averaged 10 µg/kg.18Trace elements concentrations in soil contaminate corn in the vicinity of a cement-manufacturing plant: potential health implicationsJournal of Exposure Science & Environmental EpidemiologyRead source →
Filter findings
2 control comparisons
About this table
| Control | Material | Effects | Evidence | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avoid growing cassava on mining waste or contaminated soilcultivation · As reported | Cassava | Cd · Context tAs · Context | 1Romero-Crespo et al. 2023 HMI source record · Original source One dataset family. Linked analytes, repeated seasons and reports are not independent studies. Effects and comparators CadmiumAbove the EU 50 µg/kg tropical-root limit (one sample)Root cadmium, fresh weightMining-area cassava versus EU limitCassava root, fresh weightContext · No supported numerical treatment contrast is retained for this finding. A direction, market association, source-selection strategy or guidance statement alone does not establish a percentage change. Total arsenicBelow detection (<200 µg/kg), as in two other cropsRoot arsenic, fresh weightCassava versus other crops on the same landCassava root, fresh weightContext · No supported numerical treatment contrast is retained for this finding. A direction, market association, source-selection strategy or guidance statement alone does not establish a percentage change. Cassava against eight other crops from the same orchards and against the EU tropical-root cadmium limit; one cassava sample, June 2021. How magnitude is classified HMI editorial magnitude bands: Low is a change greater than 0% and below 25%; Moderate is 25% to below 50%; High is 50% or more, relative to that control’s own comparator. Direction is shown separately. These are descriptive display bands, not validated efficacy cutoffs, occurrence-baseline positions, statistical significance, evidence certainty, safety or net benefit. A range spanning bands retains both labels; a qualitative label has no implied percentage. Control in context Cassava grown on mining-influenced soil had lead and arsenic below detection but cadmium at 60 µg/kg, above the EU limit for tropical roots, and nickel at 2,350 µg/kg; it was one of three of nine crops grown there with arsenic below detection.
Design, applicability and operating conditions Observational survey. One mining district; one cassava sample. One study family. As reported by the source Reduces metal reaching or remaining in cassava, or detects it before release. Source measurements and linked outcomes
Observational; no siting intervention was tested. Percentages are calculated from the source means shown in outcomes. Basis as stated in outcomes; no mass balance reported. Trade-offs and implementation Cyanide is outside this table. Not assessed. Not assessed. Not quantified. Not assessed. Applicability and verification One mining district; one cassava sample. Lot testing. See source. Extraction limits and next actions
Provenance and assessment As disclosed by the source. Source facts and HMI calculations are distinguished above. These selected source findings do not constitute a systematic review; outcome-level appraisal remains incomplete. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Grow corn away from cement plants and other industrial emitterscultivation · As reported | Corn | Pb · Increased Pb · Increased | 1Abatemi-Usman et al. 2023 HMI source record · Original source One dataset family. Linked analytes, repeated seasons and reports are not independent studies. Effects and comparators LeadIncreasedDownwind farms higher (observational)Grain lead, dry weightFarm 2.3 km downwind against control farmMaize grain, dry weightHigh · HMI calculates the relative change from the retained source means: (380 − 20) / 20 × 100 = 1800.0%. This is a descriptive contrast of means; no confidence interval or significance test is inferred. LeadIncreasedDownwind farms higher (observational)Grain lead, dry weightFarm 0.7 km downwind against control farmMaize grain, dry weightHigh · HMI calculates the relative change from the retained source means: (230 − 20) / 20 × 100 = 1050.0%. This is a descriptive contrast of means; no confidence interval or significance test is inferred. Downwind farms against the upwind control farm, same harvest and method; 12–24 cobs per farm. How magnitude is classified HMI editorial magnitude bands: Low is a change greater than 0% and below 25%; Moderate is 25% to below 50%; High is 50% or more, relative to that control’s own comparator. Direction is shown separately. These are descriptive display bands, not validated efficacy cutoffs, occurrence-baseline positions, statistical significance, evidence certainty, safety or net benefit. A range spanning bands retains both labels; a qualitative label has no implied percentage. Control in context Maize from the three farms downwind of the plant averaged 230–380 µg/kg lead, against 20 µg/kg at a control farm 18 km upwind; a farm 2.7 km upwind averaged 10 µg/kg.
Design, applicability and operating conditions Observational field survey. Farmland near a cement plant; wind direction mattered more than distance. One study family. As reported by the source Reduces metal reaching corn, or detects it before release. Source measurements and linked outcomes
Observational; one plant and harvest. Differences are read from the source means or medians shown in outcomes. Basis as stated in outcomes; no mass balance reported. Trade-offs and implementation Mycotoxins are outside this table. Not assessed. Not assessed. Not quantified. Not assessed. Applicability and verification Farmland near a cement plant; wind direction mattered more than distance. Lot testing. See source. Extraction limits and next actions
Provenance and assessment As disclosed by the source. Source facts and HMI calculations are distinguished above. These selected source findings do not constitute a systematic review; outcome-level appraisal remains incomplete. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No matching controls in this selected evidence. This is a coverage boundary, not proof that no control exists. Change or reset the filters.
Trade-offs and limits of controls
Avoiding exposed growing areas lowered the metal measured in the studies available, but no study measured the cost or supply effect of doing so.7Mercury pollution in vegetables, grains and soils from areas surrounding coal-fired power plantsScientific ReportsRead source → Metals do not move together, so a lot that passes a lead limit says little about cadmium, arsenic or nickel unless those are tested as well.
Testing eggplant for metals
Results depend on the method and its reporting limit. Reporting limits for lead ranged from 0.5 µg/kg (Al-Salimi et al. 2026) to 3,000 µg/kg (WHO GEMS/Food), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →19Lead and trace element contamination in market vegetables of Aden, Yemen: a human health risk assessmentDiscover Chemistry (2026) 3:83Read source → Reporting limits for cadmium ranged from 0.1 µg/kg (Al-Salimi et al. 2026) to 10 µg/kg (Liang et al. 2019), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.11Analysis of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs and an Assessment of the Health Risks to the General Public via Consumption in Beijing, ChinaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthRead source →19Lead and trace element contamination in market vegetables of Aden, Yemen: a human health risk assessmentDiscover Chemistry (2026) 3:83Read source → Reporting limits for total arsenic ranged from 0.4 µg/kg (Liang et al. 2019) to 3 µg/kg (FDA Total Diet Study), so a non-detect from a less sensitive method says much less.2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →11Analysis of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs and an Assessment of the Health Risks to the General Public via Consumption in Beijing, ChinaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthRead source →
A useful lot result names the form, the basis and a quantification limit well below the limit that applies.
Buying and verifying eggplant
No maximum level for metals in eggplant was verified from primary text for this page; buyers should confirm the limit that applies in the destination market.
Exposure from eggplant
No source in the library converted eggplant concentrations into a verified estimate of intake for a defined population. Concentrations describe the food, not individual risk.
Evidence review and remaining gaps
Every source record that names eggplant was decided on its content: 27 occurrence extracted, 27 records in all. The occurrence table renders every extracted result; held values remain visible with their reason.
References identify the sources used in these answers. The Sources index preserves additional discovery links; inclusion there does not mean a source has been reviewed for this assessment. Corrections, completed searches, new direct evidence and changes in requirements should reopen the relevant answer.
Eggplant FAQs
What heavy metals are found in eggplant?
The library reports lead, cadmium, total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, dimethylarsinic acid, monomethylarsonic acid, total mercury, nickel, chromium, aluminium, tin, antimony, uranium, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, V, Se, Ag, As, B, Ba, Hg, Mo, Sr and Ti in eggplant, most often lead, cadmium and total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →2FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsFDA Total Diet StudyRead source →3Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthScientia Agricola 69(1):54-60Read source →4Assessment of heavy metal levels and associated health risks linked to vegetables grown in Noakhali region of BangladeshEnvironmental Health InsightsRead source → WHO GEMS/Food submissions reported lead in eggplant, as sold from 244 results in 3 reporting regions, with a subgroup median of 5 µg/kg.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
How do heavy metals get into eggplant?
In the studies available, eggplant from contaminated or exposed settings carried more metal than eggplant from the same study’s control.7Mercury pollution in vegetables, grains and soils from areas surrounding coal-fired power plantsScientific ReportsRead source → Eggplant, as sold from Location A1 (industrial-affected area) had total mercury higher at 42.4 µg/kg, against 0.43 µg/kg for Control (grocery store >55 km from any power plant) in the same study.7Mercury pollution in vegetables, grains and soils from areas surrounding coal-fired power plantsScientific ReportsRead source →
Which types of eggplant have the lowest levels?
For cadmium, the HMI reference median was lowest for eggplant, as sold (10.8 µg/kg) and highest for eggplant, as sold (600 µg/kg); forms differ in water content, so this compares foods as sold or eaten, not uptake.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →5EVALUATION OF HEAVY METALS IN A SELECTION OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN VEGETABLES COLLECTED AT THE ERBIL MARKETMalaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 8(2):80-82Read source →14Heavy Metal Contaminations and Health Risk Assessment from Fruits and Vegetables in Bangalore Rural Markets, Karnataka, IndiaRasayan Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2498-2507Read source →15Metal concentration in commonly sold fruit vegetables in Dhaka city market and probable health riskDhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences 30(1):35-47Read source →
Which regions report the lowest levels in eggplant?
Among GEMS/Food reporting regions, eggplant, as sold had the lowest cadmium subgroup median in EMRO (3.91 µg/kg) and the highest in WPRO (39 µg/kg); reporting regions are markets, not growing areas.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →
How much of the arsenic in eggplant is inorganic?
Inorganic arsenic, the more toxic form, was measured in 5 results from 3 sources, far fewer than total arsenic.1GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsGEMS/Food Contamination Monitoring and Assessment ProgrammeRead source →20Speciation of arsenic in vegetables and their correlation with inorganic phosphate levelBangladesh Journal of Pharmacology 2007; 2: 88-94Read source →21The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicCentre for Food Safety, Food and Environmental Hygiene Department, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative RegionRead source → Laizu 2007 reported inorganic arsenic at 800 µg/kg (mean ± 1,000 SD) in eggplant, as sold from fruiting vegetables, local market, Dhaka.20Speciation of arsenic in vegetables and their correlation with inorganic phosphate levelBangladesh Journal of Pharmacology 2007; 2: 88-94Read source →
References
Works cited on this page, in citation-number order. See Sources for this page’s source inventory. Each title links to a source record with bibliographic details, reported findings, and document provenance.
- GEMS/Food Contaminants database heavy-metal exportsDataset
- FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical ResultsDataset
- Heavy metals in vegetables and potential risk for human healthPeer-reviewed
- Assessment of heavy metal levels and associated health risks linked to vegetables grown in Noakhali region of BangladeshPeer-reviewed
- EVALUATION OF HEAVY METALS IN A SELECTION OF DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN VEGETABLES COLLECTED AT THE ERBIL MARKETPeer-reviewed
- Lead Contamination in Selected Foods from Riyadh City Market and Estimation of the Daily IntakePeer-reviewed
- Mercury pollution in vegetables, grains and soils from areas surrounding coal-fired power plantsPeer-reviewed
- Concentration and Potential Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Risk Assessment of Metals in Locally Grown VegetablesPeer-reviewed
- Assessment of Heavy Metals in Some Local and Imported Vegetables in Erbil MarketPeer-reviewed
- Infants’ and young children’s dietary exposures to lead and cadmium: FDA total diet study 2018-2020Peer-reviewed
- Analysis of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs and an Assessment of the Health Risks to the General Public via Consumption in Beijing, ChinaPeer-reviewed
- Determination of some heavy metals and their potential risk in selected vegetables on sale within Kaduna Metropolis, Kaduna State, NigeriaPeer-reviewed
- Estimation of Heavy Metals and Associated Health Risk in Selected Vegetables Grown in Peri-Urban Areas of Multan and Rawalpindi, PakistanPeer-reviewed
- Heavy Metal Contaminations and Health Risk Assessment from Fruits and Vegetables in Bangalore Rural Markets, Karnataka, IndiaPeer-reviewed
- Metal concentration in commonly sold fruit vegetables in Dhaka city market and probable health riskPeer-reviewed
- Assessment of lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) contamination in locally available vegetables in MymensinghPeer-reviewed
- Trace elements in farmland soils and crops, and probabilistic health risk assessment in areas influenced by mining activity in EcuadorPeer-reviewed
- Trace elements concentrations in soil contaminate corn in the vicinity of a cement-manufacturing plant: potential health implicationsPeer-reviewed
- Lead and trace element contamination in market vegetables of Aden, Yemen: a human health risk assessmentPeer-reviewed
- Speciation of arsenic in vegetables and their correlation with inorganic phosphate levelPeer-reviewed
- The First Hong Kong Total Diet Study: Inorganic ArsenicGovernment
Sources
Browse Eggplant Sources for sources cited on this page and additional discovery candidates. The searchable index distinguishes verified citation use from discovery relationships whose relevance has not been established.
Update history
22 October 2026: Rebuilt from every eggplant record in the library: 27 occurrence sources, references by form and basis, same-study contrasts and stage-led controls.
