Asparagus
Completeness scorecard
Deterministic gap audit — no score is composite, no cell is LLM-judged. Each chip is re-derivable by re-running tools/evidence/build-ingredient-scorecard.mjs. review: residuals and missing data are worked autonomously via data/evidence/ingredient-scorecard-review-flags.csv and wiki/completeness-gaps.md.
| Dimension | Status | What’s there (auditable counts) | What’s missing |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 Analyte coverage (tier: occasional) | OK | 5/10 HMTc analytes, total n=14 | labeled data-gaps: iAs, Al, Sn |
| D2 Regional coverage | below-tier | 4 jurisdictions, top UK 100% | over-concentrated: UK supplies 100% of sources |
| D3 Anthropogenic evidence | GAP | no upstream/attribution sources | link a supply-chain/ hub page |
| D4 Background mechanism | GAP | section present, 0 drivers, 0 upstream source(s) | drivers[] empty; no upstream source to substantiate |
| D5 Pooling depth | THIN | Pb THIN, Cd THIN, tAs THIN, tHg THIN, Ni THIN, Cr THIN, U THIN | Pb: needs 1 more study(ies); Cd: needs 1 more study(ies); tAs: needs 1 more study(ies); tHg: needs 1 more study(ies); Ni: needs 1 more study(ies); Cr: needs 1 more study(ies); U: needs 1 more study(ies) |
| D6 Speciation | OK | iAs, tAs, tHg declared | — |
| D7 Basis declaration | GAP | 2/10 populated cells declare a basis token | 8 populated cell(s) lack a basis token: Pb, Cd, iAs, tAs, Ni, Al, Sn, U |
| D8 Provenance integrity | GAP | 32 claims checked, 32 supported; 2 citations, 0 orphan, 2 foreign | 2 foreign citation(s) not naming asparagus: fda2022-tds-elements-fy2018-fy2020, who-gemsfood-heavy-metal-contaminants |
| D9 Mitigation | GAP | 0 cited lever(s), 0 mitigation/ link(s) | section present but no source-cited lever |
| D10 Regulatory coverage | OK | 2 rule link(s), 6 metal(s) covered | unmapped analytes: Ni, Cr, U |
| D11 Standards-readiness | NOT-READY | priority: Pb, Cd, tAs, tHg, Ni, Cr, U; pairing 0 paired, 7 single, 0 unpaired | Pb: THIN, needs 1 more study(ies); Cd: THIN, needs 1 more study(ies); tAs: THIN, needs 1 more study(ies); tHg: THIN, needs 1 more study(ies); Ni: THIN, needs 1 more study(ies); Cr: THIN, needs 1 more study(ies); U: THIN, needs 1 more study(ies); basis: 8 populated cell(s) lack a basis token: Pb, Cd, iAs, tAs, Ni, Al, Sn, U |
| Principle balance | flag | consumer-protection 1.00, contamination-reduction 0.00, brand-value 0.00, legal-defensibility 0.38, scale 0.25 | spread 1.00 — starved: contamination-reduction |
This ingredient stub was created during the FDA FY2018-FY2020 Total Diet Study element-results ingest so future source ingests have a stable destination for this food matrix. FDA reports this item as TDS Food 115, “Asparagus, fresh/frozen, boiled.” fda2022-tds-elements-fy2018-fy2020
Why this commodity accumulates heavy metals
Asparagus is a perennial vegetable whose edible portion is the young shoot harvested before the fern stage. The shoot grows from a crown embedded in the soil, and metal transfer from soil to the shoot tissue occurs via root uptake through the vascular system. Cadmium is the analyte of greatest concern in asparagus within the FDA TDS FY2018-FY2020 dataset: the TDS data for “Asparagus, fresh/frozen, boiled” (TDS Food 115, n=27) show Cd detectable at all 27 samples with a median of 10 ppb, a p90 of 39.2 ppb, and a maximum of 54 ppb (FDA 2022). Nickel is also detectable in most samples, with a median of 130 ppb and a maximum of 240 ppb. These concentrations are consistent with asparagus being a moderate-accumulator vegetable for Cd and Ni under typical soil conditions.
Lead concentrations in asparagus are generally low in the TDS data: the p90 is 0 ppb and only the p95 (3.01 ppb) and maximum (4.3 ppb) indicate any detectable Pb in the dataset (FDA 2022). Total arsenic is detectable at moderate levels, with a median of 3.5 ppb and a maximum of 10 ppb. These patterns are consistent with the general understanding that asparagus occupies an intermediate position among vegetables for metal accumulation: more than fruits, less than leafy greens grown in contaminated soils or root vegetables with high soil contact.
Heavy metal contamination profile
Per-analyte snapshot derived from the machine-readable contamination_profile in the frontmatter above. data gap indicates the literature has been reviewed for this commodity-analyte combination and no usable occurrence data was found (a finding, not a placeholder). The Key sources column shows the top 2-3 contributing sources by year and sample size, with numbered wikilink aliases.
| Analyte | Coverage | Typical (ppb) | p95 (ppb) | Confidence | Key sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | n=2 | 0 | 3.0 | high | 1 |
| Cd | n=2 | 5.7–39.2 | 41.7 | high | 1 |
| iAs | data gap | — | — | — | — |
| tAs | n=2 | 0–5.7 | 7.6 | high | 1 |
| tHg | n=2 | 0 | 0.2 | low | 1, 2 |
| Ni | n=2 | 59.8–204 | 210 | high | 1 |
| Al | data gap | — | — | — | — |
| Cr | n=2 | 0–390.5 | — | low | 1, 2 |
| Sn | data gap | — | — | — | — |
| U | n=2 | 0–1.2 | 1.4 | high | — |
Synthesis basis and censoring treatment
The total-mercury and chromium cells were resynthesized on 2026-06-11 on an asparagus as-consumed wet-weight basis, the form in which the boiled vegetable is reported by the FDA Total Diet Study and the WHO GEMS/Food as-consumed aggregates. Values below the analytical limit of detection or quantification are treated as left-censored, not as measured zeros.
The earlier profile reported total mercury and chromium at typical and 95th-percentile values of zero at high confidence. Those figures were an artifact of the FDA Total Diet Study FY2018-FY2020 composite for “Asparagus, fresh/frozen, boiled” (TDS Food 115, n=27), in which every composite fell below the reporting limit for both metals and the reported below-limit results were pooled as literal zeros (FDA 2022, reporting limit tHg 1 µg/kg, Cr 50 µg/kg). The honest floor for each fully censored analyte is the FDA reporting limit expressed as a left-censored bound, not a measured zero, and the upper distribution is recovered from the WHO GEMS/Food asparagus aggregates.
Total mercury rests on the WHO GEMS/Food total-mercury aggregate for asparagus (food code VS 0621, EURO region, as-consumed, n=244, 2004-2017), in which the central distribution is at or below detection (p10 through p90 all 0 µg/kg) with a 95th percentile of 0.21 µg/kg and a single maximum of 20 µg/kg (Food). The two sources agree that asparagus total mercury sits at or near the non-detect floor: the FDA cell is fully censored below 1 µg/kg and the GEMS distribution is dominated by non-detects with only the upper tail rising above zero. The typical interval is therefore carried as a left-censored 0 to 0 and the 95th percentile as 0.2 µg/kg, replacing the earlier literal zero. Confidence is low because the deeper GEMS aggregate is overwhelmingly non-detect against a 0.04 µg/kg reporting floor and the source’s exact-row aggregates remain flagged for review before standards use. Total mercury and inorganic arsenic-style speciation discipline is preserved: only the explicit GEMS “Total mercury” series populates this cell; the separate GEMS “Mercury (Hg unspecified)” asparagus rows (which report a p95 near 9.9 µg/kg and a single 20 µg/kg as-is value) are speciation-ambiguous and are excluded rather than folded into the total-mercury distribution, and methylmercury is never inferred from total mercury.
Chromium is reported as total chromium at low confidence; no asparagus hexavalent-chromium measurement exists in the corpus, so no Cr-VI value is inferred. The only grounded positive chromium value for asparagus is a single WHO GEMS/Food EURO/European-Union composite (food code VS 0621, as-consumed, n=1, year 2000, imported) at 390.5 µg/kg (Food); the FDA Total Diet Study cell is fully censored below the 50 µg/kg reporting limit across all 27 composites. The typical interval is carried from the FDA left-censored floor of 0 up to that single grounded GEMS value of 390.5 µg/kg, and the 95th percentile is left uncomputed: a single imported composite cannot define a 95th percentile, the two sources differ by roughly eightfold (FDA below 50 µg/kg versus the GEMS 390.5 µg/kg), and the corpus holds no mid-range grounded fluid-asparagus chromium value between the censored floor and that single high import, so any upper-tail figure would be an unsupported interpolation. The 390.5 µg/kg value is recorded as a single elevated imported-market anchor described here rather than adopted as a commodity-wide central, pending a corroborating asparagus chromium measurement.
FDA TDS FY2018-FY2020 Evidence
The normalized row-level data for this TDS food is stored in data/evidence/fda_tds_fy2018_2020_element_results_samples.csv, with per-food/per-analyte summaries in data/evidence/fda_tds_fy2018_2020_summary_by_food_analyte.csv. Concentrations are retained as FDA reported them, with the reporting-limit column preserved separately; reported zeroes are not rewritten as <LOD unless a source explicitly says to do so. fda2022-tds-elements-fy2018-fy2020
Routing
This node is linked from the ingredient index and the FDA TDS source routing table.
Contamination Profile State
The machine-readable contamination profile is in_progress for analytes measured in the TDS file and pending for profile metals not measured by this source. Ingredient-level values belong here once cross-source synthesis is reviewed; product-category values belong on the relevant product page.
FDA TDS FY2018-FY2020 Occurrence Values
FDA Total Diet Study FY2018-FY2020 reports prepared/composite-food concentration distributions for this ingredient as TDS food “Asparagus, fresh/frozen, boiled” (fda2022-tds-elements-fy2018-fy2020). Values are in ppb-equivalent on the basis FDA reported. The full sample-level data are stored in data/evidence/fda_tds_fy2018_2020_element_results_samples.csv; per-analyte distributions in data/evidence/fda_tds_fy2018_2020_summary_by_food_analyte.csv. These distributions count as one source under persistent-wiki-ingest-rule synthesis discipline; numerical values stay in body scratch until a second independent source is integrated.
| Metal | n | min | p10 | p50 | p90 | p95 | max | Schema |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | 27 | 3 | 5.7 | 10 | 39.2 | 41.7 | 54 | in profile |
| Cr | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | in profile |
| Ni | 27 | 0 | 59.8 | 130 | 204 | 210 | 240 | in profile |
| Pb | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.01 | 4.3 | in profile |
| U | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.22 | 1.4 | 1.8 | in profile |
| tAs | 27 | 0 | 0 | 3.5 | 5.72 | 7.58 | 10 | in profile |
| tHg | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | in profile |
Ranges by source, region, and variety
The FDA FY2018-FY2020 TDS data (TDS Food 115, n=27) are the primary quantitative occurrence source in the current corpus for asparagus across most analytes (FDA 2022), with the WHO GEMS/Food asparagus aggregates (food code VS 0621) supplying the total-mercury and chromium distributions where the FDA composites are fully censored (Food). The TDS is a US market composite dataset purchased at retail across multiple US cities, so it reflects the blended contribution of domestic (California, Michigan, Washington) and imported (Peru, Mexico) asparagus without geographic separation at the sample level. The GEMS total-mercury aggregate is European-region as-consumed data (n=244, 2004-2017) sitting at or near the non-detect floor, while the single grounded GEMS chromium value (n=1, year 2000, imported, 390.5 µg/kg as-consumed) is an isolated elevated import rather than a commodity-wide central, as detailed in the synthesis-basis section above. Asparagus grown in soils with elevated Cd (associated with phosphate fertilizer use or industrial legacy) is expected to show higher Cd concentrations, but source-country breakdown is not available in the TDS data alone. Variety (green versus white asparagus, where white is the etiolated form grown without light) may influence metal distribution, but no varietal comparison data appear in the current corpus. Synthesis of geographic and varietal ranges will be updated when additional occurrence sources are integrated.
Processing effects
The asparagus in the TDS dataset is reported as “fresh/frozen, boiled,” meaning the measured concentrations reflect post-boiling concentrations. Boiling in water leaches water-soluble metal fractions into the cooking liquid, which is typically discarded; this means that concentrations in the cooked, drained asparagus may be lower than in the raw plant tissue for water-soluble metal species. The magnitude of leaching depends on cooking time, water volume, and the speciation of the metal. Freezing prior to cooking does not materially alter metal concentrations. Canning asparagus in tinplate introduces a Sn contamination route, but the TDS data reflect boiled fresh or frozen asparagus rather than canned product. Quantified leaching reduction factors specific to asparagus are not available in the current corpus; section will be expanded when relevant evidence is ingested.
Ingredient-derivative risk
Asparagus is consumed primarily as a whole vegetable and has limited downstream derivative forms. Canned asparagus in tinplate introduces Sn from can linings as an additional analyte compared to fresh or frozen. Asparagus in ready meals or soups carries the vegetable’s metal load into the composite product. Asparagus extract or asparagus powder, used in dietary supplements, concentrates the metal content of the vegetable material; no occurrence data for these derivatives appear in the current corpus.
Mitigation options
Sourcing levers
Sourcing asparagus from regions with documented low soil Cd (avoiding fields with heavy phosphate fertilizer history or industrial contamination) represents the primary lever given Cd’s detectability across all TDS samples. Country-of-origin specification, distinguishing domestic US product from imported Peruvian or Mexican asparagus, may reveal different Cd distributions when source-level data become available. Quantified source-switching reduction factors are not available in the current corpus; section will be expanded when relevant evidence is ingested.
Agronomic levers
Soil pH management (maintaining pH above 6.5) reduces Cd bioavailability and plant uptake. Phosphate fertilizer selection, preferring cadmium-tested low-Cd phosphate sources, limits ongoing soil Cd accumulation in asparagus beds. Quantified agronomic-lever effects specific to asparagus are not available in the current corpus; section will be expanded when relevant evidence is ingested.
Processing levers
Boiling and discarding the cooking water removes some water-soluble metal fractions. Avoidance of tinplate canning eliminates the Sn contamination route for canned product. Quantified reduction from boiling and draining for asparagus are not available in the current corpus; section will be expanded when relevant evidence is ingested.
Formulation levers
No quantified data on this lever in the current corpus; section will be expanded when relevant evidence is ingested.
Testing and QC levers
No quantified data on this lever in the current corpus; section will be expanded when relevant evidence is ingested.
Packaging and storage levers
Preference for glass, plastic, or retort pouch packaging over tinplate canning eliminates the Sn contamination route applicable to canned asparagus products.
Regulatory limits that apply
In the European Union, Regulation (EU) 2023/915 establishes maximum levels for Pb and Cd in vegetables. For asparagus, as a fresh vegetable, the applicable Pb ML is 0.10 mg/kg (100 ppb) wet weight and the Cd ML is 0.050 mg/kg (50 ppb) wet weight (eu2023-contaminants-maximum-levels). No specific EU ML for asparagus Cd deviating from the general vegetable value appears in the current corpus; some leafy and stem vegetables have higher specific limits. In the United States, no FDA action level for Pb, Cd, or Ni in fresh asparagus exists under current Closer to Zero guidelines (fda-closer-to-zero); FDA’s Closer to Zero program focuses on processed infant and toddler foods rather than fresh vegetables directly. No Codex Alimentarius ML specifically for asparagus contaminants appears in the current corpus. For canned asparagus, the EU applies an Sn ML of 200 mg/kg for canned solid food under Regulation (EU) 2023/915.
Sources
Auto-generated from source-page frontmatter. The “Used on this page for” column is populated by the orchestrator’s POPULATE-SOURCE-LEGEND action; pending entries appear as *[awaiting synthesis]*.
| # | Citation | Year | Type | Used on this page for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FDA 2022. FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical Results, FDA Total Diet Study | 2022 | Government dataset | FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 multi-element occurrence distributions for Asparagus, fresh/frozen, boiled (n=27); detectable concentrations for Cd, Ni, Pb, U, tAs |
| 2 | Blunden et al. 2003. Tin in canned food: a review and understanding of occurrence and effect, Food and Chemical Toxicology, Vol. 41, Issue 12, pp. 1651-1662 | 2003 | Peer-reviewed | UK/EU/US Sn occurrence in Narrative review of tin-in-canned-food literature commissioned by ITRI Ltd (the International Tin Research Institute) compiling published primary clinical,… |
Page history
The five most recent substantive edits to this page. The full version history lives in git; when DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.
| Commit | Date | Description |
|---|---|---|
| b0f3d38 | 2026-06-12 | batch | corpus rescreen b04 old terminal skips |