Skip to content

Prose-style & consumer-language sweep — 2026-06-02 (batch 2, ingredients)

Counts: P1 0 · P2 10 · P3 11. Report-only; no pages were edited.

Pages scanned (25): almond.md, apple-cider-vinegar.md, apple.md, applesauce.md, asparagus.md, avocado.md, baby-cereals-dry.md, baked-beans.md, baked-potato-with-peel.md, balsamic-vinegar.md, banana.md, beans.md, beef.md, beet.md, beverages.md, bivalve-molluscs.md, black-pepper.md, blueberries.md, blueberry-muffin.md, bologna-luncheon-meat.md, bran-cereal-with-raisins.md, bread.md, breastmilk.md, broccoli.md, butter.md

Notes on skipped pages: baby-food.md is an autonomy-created stub (placeholder body + all-pending profile) — skipped per stub rule. beverages.md and black-pepper.md have abbreviated bodies but substantive prose sections; scanned.

Next run resumes at wiki/ingredients/butternut-squash.md.


P1 — consumer safe/dangerous without anchor

PageLineOffending textWhySuggested fixClaim-adjacent?
(none found)

P2 — bullets-in-prose & other qualifiers

PageLineOffending textWhySuggested fixClaim-adjacent?
apple.md97apples are generally a low-risk commodity for heavy metals under current commercial production conditions”low-risk commodity” characterizes risk magnitude for readers; TDS data anchor follows in the next sentence but does not precede the claimReorder: cite TDS figures first, then draw the conclusion, or add inline ppb anchor (e.g., “Pb p90 = 0 ppb in TDS data, making apples a lower-risk commodity”)⚠ yes — rephrasing the risk conclusion could alter meaning
almond.md114Lead and cadmium in whole almonds are generally low under typical commercial production conditions in North America and Europe”generally low” for Pb and Cd magnitude with no quantitative anchor in the vicinity; the preceding context cites Ni onlyAdd ppb range or TDS/literature reference; or replace with “below the Pb and Cd levels of leafy and root vegetables, though North American survey data are pending”⚠ yes — editor must verify whether occurrence data support a low-end claim before rewording
apple-cider-vinegar.md98apples are generally low-Pb and low-Cd among fruits”generally low-Pb and low-Cd among fruits” characterizes contamination magnitude without a quantitative anchor; Acosta 1993 reference in same sentence gives relative rank at vinegar level but no ppb numbers for appleReplace with observed ppb range from TDS/Acosta data, or rephrase to “sit at the lower end of the within-vinegar Pb distribution per Acosta 1993”⚠ yes — depends on what literature actually supports for apple Pb/Cd levels
blueberry-muffin.md99Wheat flour contributes trace amounts of Cd and Pb from cereal grain accumulation in soil”trace amounts” is an undefined magnitude qualifier; no ppb value given for wheat flour’s Cd/Pb contributionReplace with approximate concentration range: e.g., “carries Cd at typically 20–100 ppb depending on grain origin” — or remove “trace” and describe the source pathway only⚠ yes — the qualifier “trace” implicitly asserts a low contribution that may or may not be supported for all wheat origins
blueberry-muffin.md99eggs and fats are generally low-metal”generally low-metal” characterizes risk/contamination magnitude without a quantitative anchor or source reference for eggs and fatsAdd brief quantitative context (e.g., “eggs and fats carry metals below detection in TDS data”) or rephrase to “contribute little metal relative to the grain fraction”no — this is a general description of ingredient class, less claim-sensitive
blueberry-muffin.md99sugar and leavening are minor contributors”minor contributors” is a magnitude qualifier; no quantitative anchorRephrase to describe the mechanism (“sugar and refined leavening carry very low metal loads because they are highly refined and lack soil-contact mineral matrices”) or omit — the dilution point is already madeno — minor contributors is mechanistically defensible but unanchored
avocado.md153avocado oil carries very low metal concentrations”very low” characterizes magnitude without a quantitative anchor; mechanism (lipid partitioning) is given but no ppb or referenceAdd “typically below detection in lipidomic surveys (no occurrence data in current corpus)” or cite a supporting reference⚠ yes — editor should verify no avocado oil occurrence data contradicts “very low” before confirming
avocado.md157Avocado oil is a low-risk derivative for metals given the lipophilic partitioning away from dissolved metals”low-risk” characterizes risk for the reader; mechanism anchor (lipophilic partitioning) is stated but no ppb anchor or referenceRephrase to describe the mechanism and note that no occurrence data are in the corpus: “avocado oil, through lipophilic partitioning, concentrates little of the dissolved-metal load; no occurrence data appear in the current corpus”⚠ yes — “low-risk” implies a conclusion about consumer exposure; editor should confirm the corpus gap before restating
banana.md97thick-skinned tropical fruits present low metal risk to consumers”low metal risk to consumers” is a consumer-facing risk characterization; TDS data in the preceding sentence anchor this claim for banana, but the sentence generalizes to all thick-skinned tropical fruits without a population or dose anchorLimit the generalization to banana specifically, citing the TDS data: “consistent with banana’s documented near-zero Pb/Cd in TDS”⚠ yes — generalizing to all thick-skinned tropical fruits may not be supported by data for mango, papaya, etc.
balsamic-vinegar.md98grape-must carries grape-source Pb and Cd at modest levels driven by vineyard soil and atmospheric deposition”modest levels” characterizes contamination magnitude; the context refers to the substrate Pb/Cd before aging and concentration steps, but no quantitative anchor is given for the grape-must baselineAdd a ppb reference or note that the grape-must baseline is not independently quantified in the loaded corpus⚠ yes — “modest” implies a low-risk substrate level; if the base Pb is not modest, the characterization misleads the reader about where the risk originates

P3 — em dashes & inline bold

PageLineOffending textWhySuggested fixClaim-adjacent?
balsamic-vinegar.md94Balsamic vinegar — the aged grape-must-derived condiment … — sits at the high endEm-dash pair around an extended appositive in running proseReplace with parentheses: “Balsamic vinegar (the aged grape-must-derived condiment … or industrially produced …) sits at the high end”no
balsamic-vinegar.md98organic-matter content — the longer-aged, more concentrated, more organic-rich product carries higher metal loadsEm dash connecting a study finding clause to its elaboration in running proseReplace with a comma or parenthesis: “with the elevation correlated with organic-matter content (the longer-aged, more concentrated product carries higher loads)“no
beans.md94Beans — the broad legume category covering dried and canned pulses … — sit at the middleEm-dash pair around an extended appositive at sentence openingReplace with parentheses: “Beans (the broad legume category covering dried and canned pulses …) sit at the middle”no
beef.md149Organ meats — particularly liver and kidney — carry 5-20×Em-dash pair around a parenthetical qualifier in running proseReplace with parentheses: “Organ meats (particularly liver and kidney) carry 5-20דno
banana.md97edible portion — yielding the lowest hazard index (0.02) of the three fruitsEm dash connecting cited result to an elaborating clauseReplace with comma or semicolon: “in the edible portion, yielding the lowest hazard index” or separate into two sentencesno
banana.md149dry-weight basis — confirming the low-Pb, low-Cd banana profileEm dash connecting a methodological qualifier to an interpretive clauseReplace with a comma or semicolon: “on a dry-weight basis, confirming the low-Pb, low-Cd banana profile”no
breastmilk.md175**Sourcing levers** ([[mitigation/supply-chain-screening]]) — not applicableEm dash separating definition label from explanation in the Mitigation section; borderline (the bold is a legitimate label), but the dash is doing the work a colon or period should do in proseReplace the em dash with a colon or period: “Sourcing levers (…): not applicable…” — applies to all five instances at lines 175, 177, 179, 181, 185no
breastmilk.md177**Agronomic levers** ([[mitigation/agronomic]]) — not directly applicableSame pattern as line 175Same fix as line 175no
breastmilk.md179**Processing levers** ([[mitigation/processing]]) — not applicable to fresh breastmilkSame pattern as line 175Same fix as line 175no
breastmilk.md181**Formulation levers** ([[mitigation/formulation]]) — not applicable to breastmilk itselfSame pattern as line 175Same fix as line 175no
breastmilk.md185**Packaging and storage levers** ([[mitigation/packaging-and-storage]]) — for pumped/stored milkSame pattern as line 175Same fix as line 175no