Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Breastmilk cadmium levels and estimated

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by10 pages
Metals measured5
Evidence tierB
Year2023

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • Results Breastmilk samples were obtained from 256 lactating women. The mean breastmilk cadmium level was 0.34
  • (SD: 0.33) μg / L and the mean EDI of cadmium via breastmilk was 0.059 (SD: 0.058) µg / kg per body weight / day.
  • Breastmilk cadmium levels were quantified in 92.6% of the breastmilk samples. Of the breastmilk samples, 13 (5.1%)
  • calculated at a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) based on
  • failure, demineralization of bones, and increased risk of The value of Z at 95% CI was 1.96; σ was the standard
  • shop (living within 500 m of a paints shop was defined was 106%. The purity of the Aragon gas used in this study
  • as near); living in a house with peeling or chipping house was 99.9990%. Thermo-Fisher Scientific’s isotope 111Cd
  • tionnaire is provided as Supplementary Table S1. by the infants per 24 h (24). Equation (2) was used to
  • were incubated overnight in 10% ­HNO3 to prevent the the variables that were statistically significant in the Stu-
  • perature. To each 1 mL of breastmilk, 4 mL of 65% (v / v) tion factor values. In this study, statistical significance
  • ­HNO3 and 2 mL of 30% (v / v) hydrogen peroxide ­(H2O2) was indicated by a P-value of < 0.05.
  • Ethics Table 1 Demographic variables of the lactating women
  • This study was conducted in adherence to the local and (n = 256)
  • tating women were less than 30 years old (64.1%), had 12
  • children (56.3%), age of child was six months and more
  • (78.9%), resided in rural areas (52.7%), lived within 500 m
  • of an industrial area (57.4%), reported low monthly
  • income (68.4%), did not attend a university (87.9%), lived
  • far from disposals of wastes (92.2%), frequently used cos-
  • use vitamins frequently (61.7%). Of the lactating women,
  • The mean breastmilk cadmium level in this study was University 31 12.1
  • 0.34 (SD: 0.33) μg / L and the mean EDI of cadmium via Living in the vicinity of disposal of wastes
  • (7.4%) of the breastmilk samples. Of the breastmilk sam- Use of cosmetics
  • ples, 13 (5.1%) had cadmium levels above those reported Less frequent (occasionally / rarely) 39 15.2
  • Details of these associations are shown in Table 2. who were older than 30 years have a buildup of cadmium
  • mium levels could be quantified in 92.6% of the breast- metics use (32). Cadmium levels were significantly and
  • 99% of the breastmilk samples collected from the region ics. Similarly, cadmium was detected in hair dyes and
  • of Ankara (27). However, cadmium was detected in 38% other hair coloring cosmetics (34, 35). A previous study
  • over, only 5.1% of the breastmilk samples in this study (8). Taken together, these findings indicate the regula-
  • compared to 30% of the breastmilk samples in Morocco to reduce / prevent the availability of these products to
  • Table 2 Breastmilk cadmium levels and estimated daily intake of cadmium according to participant characteristics
  • Table 3 Predictors of higher breastmilk cadmium levels

Methods (brief)

  • and exposure to sources of cadmium were collected in an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Foremilk samples
  • (about 5 mL) were collected in polyethylene tubes using the hand-expression technique. The breast milk samples
  • were collected in the period between December 2020 and March 2021. A pre-validated method using inductively
  • coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was used to quantify breastmilk cadmium levels. EDI values were calcu‑
  • Results Breastmilk samples were obtained from 256 lactating women. The mean breastmilk cadmium level was 0.34
  • Breastmilk cadmium levels were quantified in 92.6% of the breastmilk samples. Of the breastmilk samples, 13 (5.1%)
  • Keywords Cadmium, Breastmilk, Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, Lactation, Women
  • care services. The sample size needed for this study was
  • over a long period would lead to cadmium buildup in Samplesize(n) = (1)
  • items in a questionnaire and provide a breastmilk sample and then at 150 º C for 120 min (23). The clear digestate
  • study were asked to sign a written informed consent. The spectrometry (ICP-MS, Perkin Elmer Elan 9000). The
  • gated heavy metals in breast milk (19–22). The ques- Blank samples were prepared using ­HNO3 and ­H2O2
  • tionnaire collected the demographic variables of the as well as a certified reference material that was pre-
  • ing women were also asked about potential exposure to tenfold the SD of 10 blank samples. The limit of detec-
  • To collect breastmilk samples, the lactating women calculate the estimated daily intake of cadmium by the
  • ples were collected in the period between December 2020 milk, BMI: breastmilk intake per 24 h, and Wt: weight of
  • and March 2021. The foremilk samples were shipped to the infant.
  • Breastmilk samples were allowed to melt at room tem- issues was determined using tolerance and variance infla-

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised