Overview
This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.
Key numbers
The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:
- brown sandstones, siltstones and mudstones (37,39). The water table generally occurs within
- and borehole testing involving (3) use of inflatable packers to isolate discrete intervals for
- to provide a sufficiently low porewater detection limit (PWDL; 45 µg/L) (32). This value
- level (MCL) of 100 µg/L for total Cr. Matrix porewater concentrations were estimated by
- path (Figure 4b–d) in bedrock also show stable to declining trends within the plume. A
- conventional well near the river (EPA-4BR; Figure 4e) shows stable Cr(VI) trends over
- the three sampling events (range 130–160 µg/L). Stable to declining trends for Cr(VI)
- highest Cr(VI) concentration (port 2) shows a generally stable to slightly declining trend,
- while the shallower port (port 1) and three deeper ports (ports 3–5) show generally stable
- (Figure 6) estimated using mean values for ϕm and ρb-dry from 36 measurements on core
- standard deviation (σ) to the mean values (ϕm = 0.102, σ = 0.028; ρb-dry = 2.46 g/cm3, σ
- the highest Cr(VI) groundwater concentrations (3000 to 3370 µg/L), equivalent porewater
- matrix. Within the port 3 interval, the groundwater Cr(VI) concentrations ranged from 182–
- 274 µg/L, while the equivalent porewater concentrations were below the 45 µg/L PWDL
- in this interval. Within the port 4 interval, groundwater Cr(VI) concentrations ranged from
- 80–83 µg/L, while all of the equivalent porewater concentrations were below the PWDL. It
- 5 interval, groundwater Cr(VI) concentrations were low, ranging from 7–31 µg/L, and
- equivalent porewater concentrations were below the PWDL except for one sample (54 µg/L).
- below the MDL (<0.10 µg/L) and all equivalent porewater concentrations in matrix samples
- logs within the interval. The Kb values range from 7.1 × 10−8 to 8.1 × 10−7 m/s for the
- 7 port intervals. The number of fractures in each interval ranges from 2 to 8. Applying
- each interval have the same aperture, estimated hydraulic apertures range from 10ʹs to
- a few 100ʹs of microns and ϕf ranges from 3.3 × 10−5 to 1.7 × 10−4. These estimates
- that >99.8% of the Cr(VI) mass occurs in the porewater, demonstrating the significance of
- fractures. However, the matrix mass estimates are biased low since the PWDL (~45 µg/L)
- is much higher than the MDL for groundwater analyses (<0.1 µg/L). There were detectable
- detections of both Cr forms, the ratio of Cr(III) to Cr(VI) ranged from 0.52 to 22.9 with
- 10%. An orthogonal fracture network was assigned with fracture spacing, lengths and
- intervals. Fracture frequencies recorded in core logs ranged from 0 to 3.6 with an average of
- frequencies measured by ATV ranged from 0 to 2.0, with an average of 0.6 m−1 (average
- an overall average horizontal hydraulic gradient of about 1.2% and vertical gradients varying
- parallel average fracture spacing of 1.5 m is within the range of estimates based on core
- packer test values at EPA-21BR on 8 test intervals (range from 7.1 × 10−8 to 8.1 × 10−7 m/s,
- tests in 6 boreholes on 41 test intervals (range from 3.5 × 10−8 to 6.0×10−5 m/s, geometric
- concentration scale, representing the same range as the field data, for a 30-year simulation
- indicated that >99.8% of the Cr(VI) mass occurs in the rock matrix due to large surface area
- site wells. Red lines show the regional bedrock dip of ~8° and dashed orange line shows the
- Matrix porosity ϕm (−) − − 0.10 lab analyses mean
Methods (brief)
- bedrock samples from the study site, providing low porewater method detection limits
- matrix porewater Cr(VI) distributions with spacing of samples informed by lithology and
- conductivity (EC) and collection of samples for Cr(VI) and a variety of other geochemical
- provide samples representative of formation groundwater conditions, consistent with FLUTe
- The rock core recovered from borehole EPA-21BR was subsampled in detail to allow
- observed fractures in the core logs. The core samples for Cr-distribution (lengths from
- on ice to the laboratory. A total of 400 rock core samples for Cr-distributions were
- collected from the 87.3 m cored interval from 21.0–108.3 m bgs, representing an average
- sample spacing of 0.22 m. An additional 42 intact samples were also retained from the
- cores for physical-chemical properties and diffusion tests (sample lengths from 15 to 30
- in situ subsurface redox conditions. In the laboratory selected samples were analyzed
- for Cr-distributions with emphasis on samples overlapping with intervals of the borehole
- (3.05 m length) provided groundwater samples expected to represent blended mobile Cr(VI)
- and adjacent to fractures. Initially a total of 100 samples were analyzed, with average
- sample spacing of 0.19 to 0.25 m within the plume overlapping with MLS ports 1–5 (<75
- Subsequently, an additional 46 samples were analyzed to fill in gaps between ports within
- Laboratory methods were developed for Cr(VI) extraction/analysis from rock core samples
- were measured on a representative subset of samples using gravimetric methods (48).
Implications
This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.
Wiki pages this source may touch
- Fish — marine, non-predatory (sardines, anchovies, salmon, cod)
- Root-Vegetable Purees
- Cadmium
- Arsenic
- Nickel
- Chromium
Verification notes
- Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing
wiki/sources/pages before creation. - Full-PDF read:
pdftotext -layoutwas run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written. - Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
- Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
- HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.
Update history
The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.