Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Comprehensive analysis of heavy metal soil contamination in mining

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the methylmercury infant-formula research pull.

Page snapshot
Cited by12 pages
Metals measured8
Evidence tierB
Year2024

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the methylmercury infant-formula research pull. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

    1. Introduction primary contributors to soil contamination (Zheng et al., 2021). Sys­
  • terials across diverse sectors (Soltani et al., 2017). However, the rami­ (Wuana and Okieimen, 2011). For example, Umeobi et al. (Umeobi
  • fications of mining activities on the environment, particularly in the et al., 2024) investigated the distribution of elements and potentially
  • environmental concern (Mir et al., 2020). Nigeria was investigated. The results indicated that soils affected by
  • deleterious substances into the environment (Li et al., 2023). The mining mining activities, were also moderately contaminated.
  • E-mail addresses: ss.hedayatikhah69@yahoo.com (S. Hedayatikhah), aliaghababai@yahoo.com (A. Aghababai Beni).
  • 1878-5352/© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
  • (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
  • A. Haghighizadeh et al. Arabian Journal of Chemistry 17 (2024) 105777
  • the surrounding air and water ecosystems. The mining processes asso­ 2. Sources and causes of heavy metal ion pollution
  • employed in industrial applications, potentially leading to air pollution. 2.1. Mining activities and mineral exploitation
  • potentially impacting human health (Aubineau et al., 2022). metals into the environment, significantly contributing to lead, zinc,
  • Investigations demonstrate that the microbial-catalyzed electron manganese, iron, and copper contamination (Hu et al., 2020). The
  • acceptors such as Fe(III), which compete with Cr(VI) in the reduction concerns (Setia et al., 2023).
  • acceptors. Additionally, assessments reveal that paddy soils outperform For example, in a study conducted by Wang et al. (Wang et al., 2023),
  • removing heavy metals in fluvo-aquic and paddy soils (Kou et al., 2024). centrations of 238U, 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K were confined to specific
  • (Adnan et al., 2024). Heavy metals exist in various forms including mining areas and downstream, particularly in proximity to the mining
  • each with different geochemical and mineralogical backgrounds (Mishra Li et al. (Li et al., 2024) investigated the multipath diffusion process
  • et al., 2023). Previous research has shown that the solubility of trace and spatial accumulation simulation of cadmium (Cd) in lead–zinc
  • mineralogy of the soil (Piatak et al., 2004). Therefore, even in complex mining areas exhibits a decreasing trend with increasing distance from
  • metal inputs (Parvin et al., 2022). Additionally, it should be noted that highlighted the significant contributions of rainfall runoff and atmo­
  • influenced by the minerals present in the soil as well as other variables 80 %. Their model showed that rainfall runoff predominantly influences
  • like pH (Wu et al., 2020). Cd distribution, with a contribution rate ranging from 80.8 % to 100 %.
  • et al., 2023). Throughout different historical periods, primary sources of lation around lead–zinc mines.
  • and others (Karn et al., 2021). Agricultural areas near mines and such as uncontrolled tailings release, intensify the environmental
  • aluminum smelters have been subject to contamination, with mining burden of manganese contamination (Pinto et al., 2011). Dey et al. (Dey
  • operations, smelting processes, and agricultural practices being the et al., 2023) highlighted that the accumulation of environmental pol­
  • et al., 2018). Agricultural activities have been identified as the main They stressed the importance of effectively managing the industrial
  • contributors to cadmium and copper in soils (Adnan et al., 2022; Shi reprocessing of Mn pollutants, which encompasses factors such as
  • et al., 2023). Additionally, elevated concentrations of heavy metals have transportation, recycling techniques, and resource utilization, in an
  • mentary reservoirs (Kinnunen and Hedrich, 2023). Parkinson’s disease. Additionally, the rapid escalation of manganese
  • dustry plants, emphasizing the interconnectedness of land, air, and mus et al., 2022). Giri et al. (Giri et al., 2023) investigated the spatio-
  • A. Haghighizadeh et al. Arabian Journal of Chemistry 17 (2024) 105777
  • quality standards in approximately 75 % of the samples across all sea­ Fig. 1 depicts the intricate connections among various factors that
  • identify four factors explaining 68.1 % of the variance in the data, et al., 2023; Orellana Mendoza et al., 2021). Chemicals employed in the
  • carcinogenic health risks compared to adults. The Hazard Index for 2022; Karnaeva et al., 2021). Disturbances to the soil during mining
  • the child population exceeded one (1.16) during the pre-monsoon sea­ operations, such as layer depletion and surface irregularities, contribute
  • son, indicating a health risk for vulnerable children. to the escalation of soil contamination (Rosas et al., 2007). Waters
  • Zhang et al. (Zhang et al., 2023) reported that different soil types contaminated during mining processes or mineral extraction can
  • possess varying physical and chemical properties, which directly influ­ intensify soil contamination upon entering the soil (Liu et al., 2018). In
  • below 7, which can increase the solubility of heavy metal ions in the soil, pollution (Ng et al., 2019). Mining activities can induce irregularities in
  • consequently leading to higher levels of contamination. Conversely, the soil, becoming a source of soil contamination (Feitosa et al., 2021).

Methods (brief)

  • The mining industry, serving as a linchpin for global economic surfaced in soil samples collected from mining sites, necessitating a
  • metals in soil samples is influenced by the primary chemistry and mining areas. Their findings revealed that Cd in the topsoil of Pb-Zn
  • quality standards in approximately 75 % of the samples across all sea­ Fig. 1 depicts the intricate connections among various factors that
  • relationships among heavy metals concentrations, pollution sources, heavy metal concentrations, with upstream SPM samples displaying
  • findings revealed that SPM samples exhibited higher concentrations of sea cucumbers (Bengali: Somuddro Sosha) as bioindicators of heavy
  • particulate heavy metals compared to paired sediment samples collected metal contamination and toxicity. The most commonly observed heavy
  • and shipping release heavy metals into free marine ecosystems, posing a sample condition and changes during the cultivation process (Wang
  • measures to safeguard individual and collective health. within the study area, capturing representative samples that provide
  • samples from significant and polluted points for each element sepa­ Furthermore, the application of Synchrotron-based X-ray Fluores­
  • Moving on to the analysis stage, the selection of appropriate tech­ iron, and copper in soil samples (Masindi, 2017). Synchrotron-based
  • niques is of paramount importance. Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy XFM offers high spatial resolution and elemental mapping capabilities,
  • (AAS) is employed for measuring the concentration of each element allowing for detailed examination of the spatial distribution of heavy
  • individually in soil samples, providing accurate information on the metals in soil samples. XFM requires access to synchrotron facilities,
  • Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) is utilized for the high- consuming and may not be suitable for routine analysis.
  • precision analysis of trace elements in soil samples (Ech-Charef et al., The Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) technique serves
  • of the concentrations of lead, zinc, manganese, iron, and copper in soil of these elements in soil samples, providing continuous improvement in
  • samples, offering rapid results (Qu et al., 2022). data collection from various points in the region (Zhang et al., 2021). It
  • AAS is suitable for measuring individual elements with high accu­ offers real-time elemental analysis and can be portable for field appli­

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
3171d062026-08-02major1 section added
bc84bfc2026-08-02major6 sections added; narrative text revised