Maternal fish consumption and child neurodevelopment in Nutrition 1 Cohort:

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

• Intelligence Test (a test of nonverbal intelligence) at age 5 years (β 0·003, 95 % CI (0, 0·005)). A secondary analysis dividing fish consumption into
• (FAO) estimates that aquatic foods account for at least 20 % of environmental pollutant.
• wide range of seafood for the greatest cognitive benefits to neu- Among the 300 women recruited to NC1, there were several
• ever studied (> 5 ppm measured in maternal hair), consumes fish participants.
• Concise New Zealand Food Composition Tables(26). The food
• University of Rochester administered all neurodevelopmental 118·7–413·3 g/d (median 156·6 g/d; equivalent to 39 oz/week).
• the Children’s test battery included the following: CBCL(32), weeks’ gestation as shown in Table 1. As different numbers of
• Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Index(35), Expressive fers and is shown within Table 2, which also displays summary
• Tests of Achievement (Applied Problems and Letter-Word mental endpoints at each time point is presented in Table 3.
• Table 1. Maternal characteristics of Nutrition Cohort 1 (NC1) with maternal fish consumption and any completed outcomes (n 229)
• Table 2. Summary statistics for Nutrition Cohort 1 (NC1) child cognitive Table 3. Associations between maternal fish consumption (continuous)
• Table 4. Associations between maternal total fish consumption (tertiles of intake) and child neurodevelopmental outcomes at each time point adjusted for
• *Tertile median g/d (tertile range g/d); range of fish intake for each tertile at each time point is as follows: 9 months: low (n 77) = 55·0 g/d (0–74·5), middle (n 76) = 97·3 g/d (74·6–118·6),
• studies, fish consumption ranged from ∼4 oz (113 g) per week double-blind exposure design and neurodevelopmental
• Zealand Food Composition Tables, 6th ed. Palmerston North: food/mercury-levels-commercial-fish-and-shellfish-1990–2012

Methods (brief)

• collected prospectively through the completion of 4-d food dia-
• omitted, and the sample size is relatively small. 5. Bonham MP, Duffy EM, Robson PJ, et al. (2009)

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

• Fish — marine, predatory (tuna, swordfish, shark, king mackerel)
• Fish — marine, non-predatory (sardines, anchovies, salmon, cod)
• Shellfish (shrimp, crab, lobster, clams, oysters, mussels)
• Mercury
• Mercury

Verification notes

• Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
• Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
• Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
• Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
• HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.