Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

and retention of DHA and EPA in selected fish fillets

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by7 pages
Metals measured2
Evidence tierB
Year2018

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • 2.0 ml of 12% BF3 in methanol was added to the
  • Statistics 22.0 and expressed as mean ± SD. Paired and food sources.
  • lets of yellowstripe scad (77.5 ± 0.2%) and salmon its lipid content, concentration of unsaturated fatty
  • (71.6 ± 0.5%). Total fat content in the raw fish fillet acids, and the presence of iron in different species 21 .
  • was the highest in salmon (9.45 ± 0.05%) compared The fact is also supported by the literature which re-
  • with raw fillets of yellowstripe scad (1.84 ± 0.08%) ported that a loss in lipids was noticed after cooking
  • Table 1 Fatty acid (% by wt) composition of palm oil for Table 2 Estimation of DHA and EPA content of raw fish
  • of aluminium foil to wrap fish sample might have was observed for the heated oil sample (Table 1).
  • to steaming of food where the fish fillet was cooked As shown in Table 2, DHA, EPA, and total fatty
  • losses vary greatly with fish species and cooking calibration method (Table 3). Results of both area
  • species 24 . Hence changes in cooking yield between of salmon and Japanese threadfin bream (Tables 2
  • As shown in Table 1, fatty acid composition of the EPA content, followed by raw fillets salmon and
  • Table 3 Quantification of total fatty acids, DHA, and EPA by steaming and baking in foil methods were not
  • Data are expressed as mean ± SD (mg/100 g FW) of fillets were deep-fried with high-SFA palm oil, where
  • fish fillets at p < 0.05 (Table 4). Retention of total
  • ples could be due to the influence of geographical Table 4 Total fatty acids content in fish fillets of selected
  • Retention of total fatty acids, DHA, and EPA in Data are expressed as mean ± SD (mg/100 g FW) of
  • As shown in Table 4, all fried fish fillets had signif- difference at p < 0.05 (Games-Howell post-hoc test).
  • Table 5 Quantitative determination of DHA and EPA con- pared to the raw fillets. No significant difference
  • Data are expressed as mean ± SD (mg/100 g FW) of all fish fillets. In fact, yellowstripe scad had the
  • the steaming method. As shown in Table 5, EPA and baking methods showed no significant decrease
  • As shown in Table 5, retention of DHA and EPA Thermal treatment has been reported for its
  • antioxidants in fish species of Salmonidae family fat fish (2% and 1%, respectively) while salmon is a
  • with red coloured flesh which can prevent oxidation fatty fish (10%). The low TRV in salmon fillet can be
  • this study, the fried and grilled salmon fillets had (2% fat) is much less susceptible to fat drip during
  • Fig. 2 demonstrates true retention values (TRVs) of range of 71–85% 39 . The trend of TRVs of DHA

Methods (brief)

  • raw sample, especially yellowstripe scad with a total monounsaturated fatty acid content of 175 mg/100 g. Retention
  • of consumption of marine fish, other marine prod- tion of PUFA in fish samples 4 .
  • before consumption. Thermo-sensitive compounds fish samples. Similar findings are also reported in
  • From a nutritional point of view, it is neces- fish sample (the fillet from 2–3 fishes) was obtained.
  • sary to recommend the best cooking method for The fish sample was seasoned with salt for 10 min
  • retaining nutritional and healthy attributes of fish prior to cooking. Later, the seasoned fish samples
  • tent among the studied fish samples 7 . This study For raw fish samples, the fish fillets were stored in
  • MATERIALS AND METHODS fish samples were immersed in the heated oil and
  • the samples were turned over and deep-fried at 2-
  • Analytical and chromatography grade of chemicals min interval. The samples were intact during the 8-
  • Merck kGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). Butylated hy- cooked samples to absorb excessive oil.
  • was used as an external standard for fatty acid seasoned fish samples was done in an electrically
  • analysis. operated Convotherm oven at 180 °C. The samples
  • Sample preparation soned samples was grilled for 10 min, turned over,
  • randomly from the bin. All samples were placed in to boil and the seasoned fish samples were placed
  • instantly transferred to the laboratory. The average was covered with a lid and the fish samples were
  • into consideration during purchasing the sample. Baking protocol was adopted from Ref. 9. Briefly,
  • Before cooking, the fish were eviscerated and each seasoned fish sample was wrapped with

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised