Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Illuminating Sunscreens:

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by4 pages
Metals measured1
Evidence tierB
Year2021

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • Table 1. FDA-approved organic UV filters listed alongside their maximum approved
  • Table 2. FDA-approved inorganic (nanoparticulate) UV filters listed alongside their
  • Other notable components include: the Nd3+:YAG pumped OPO tunable laser source; a
  • for 95% of the total solar radiation incident on human skin. Contrary to earlier beliefs
  • harmful UV radiation into heat with almost 100% efficiency,(45) it is recognized that
  • ca. 30% of the total solar irradiance that reaches the surface of the Earth.(51,52) With most
  • a dose of 360-720 J/cm2 over 57-114 minutes, such dosages represent a range equivalent
  • Administration (FDA)-approved UV filters are outlined in Tables 1 and 2.(81,82)
  • Table 1. FDA-approved organic UV filters listed alongside their maximum approved
  • Table 2. FDA-approved inorganic (nanoparticulate) UV filters listed alongside their
  • sunscreen with an SPF of 25 will block out 96% of UV-B light etc. In an effort to uniform
  • wavelength at which > 90% of the sunscreen’s spectral coverage occurs and must value
  • Figure 3), a widely used UV-A absorber found in a range of sunscreens sold worldwide.
  • notoriously included in as many as ca. 45% of the sunscreens approved for sale in the US.
  • ‘bulk’ effects can be fully assessed and manipulated.(114,126,129,182) A widespread range of
  • close conjunction with a range of the aforementioned (i.e., 2D-IR, TEAS, and TVAS) and
  • manipulated, and mass-analyzed via means of mass spectrometry.(197) This coupling of
  • the electronic configuration and vibrational dynamics of a range of systems, (197)
  • ground S0 state at a timescale beyond the means of the experiment (> 1 ns).(150)
  • shows ca. 20-40% of its population internally converting to the S1(*) state and conclude
  • U = 0). In this sense, as only ions with a selected m/z value exhibit a stable ion trajectory
  • 03-F01, Thorlabs, Inc.) that reflects across the 200-2000 nm spectral range is conveniently
  • Other notable components include: the Nd3+:YAG pumped OPO tunable laser source; a
  • system (Eq. 1.4) are measured by means of “action spectroscopy” – a term notably coined
  • constant across the spectral range, Eq. 1.4 can be simplified and rearranged to give Eq. 1.5:
  • excited energy level (4F5/2). As this level is that of an unstable state, and exhibits a short
  • Appendices 1-4). Accordingly, once the targeted laser power is met, the adjustable prism
  • pulse power or shot stability is > 15%), the non-linear optics (NLOs) of the laser will need
  • (49) J. Krutmann, T. Passeron, Y. Gilaberte, C. Granger, G. Leone, M. Narda, S.
  • Table S1. Calculated relative energies and physical properties of OB dependent on pH.
  • Scheme S1. All the structures from Table S1. Arrows indicate the deprotonation site for
  • and 13.0, respectively. Basic mixture solutions > 10% MeOH are not shown due to the
  • ionic fragmentation, Table S1 provides ion counts measured in a typical experimental run
  • Table S1. Percent electron depletion of (PBSA–H)– calculated directly from precursor
  • giving ~0.3 mJ across the range 400-214 nm (3.1-5.8 eV). A laser step size of 2 nm was
  • USA) with an ESI source, run in the negative ion mode between 0-100% collisional
  • with m/z < 50 are not detectable in our mass spectrometer since low masses fall outside
  • respectively, illustrating a clear onset of thermal fragment production at 20% HCD energy.
  • thermal fragment ions are summarized in Table 1, and their postulated structures presented
  • proposed structural assignments outlined in Table S1. A condensed version is available in
  • Table S1. Proposed structures for the major ionic fragments of (BP4–H)– (m/z 307)
  • (HCD) at 40% and 70% HCD energies.

Methods (brief)

  • photolysis cells with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, we use a model system
  • existing sunscreens and demonstrate the utility of laser-interfaced mass spectrometry for
  • 1.3 Laser Photodissociation Mass Spectrometry … 32
  • 1.3.1 Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry … 33
  • 1.3.2 Quadrupole Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry … 35
  • Phenylbenzimidazole‐5‐Sulfonic Acid via Laser‐Interfaced Mass Spectrometry … 80
  • Mass Spectrometry … 81
  • via Laser‐Interfaced Mass Spectrometry… 132
  • interfaced mass spectrometry experimental set up. … 48
  • Phenylbenzimidazole-5-Sulfonic Acid via Laser-Interfaced Mass Spectrometry”
  • ozone much more quickly than it could be replaced.(23–26) The signing of the landmark
  • photoprotection provided by a sunscreen when applied in vivo (i.e., on skin samples) at an
  • alter the IR pump pulse that imposes onto the sample.(135) After a specified delay time, the
  • IR probe pulse is overlapped spatially with the pump beam in the sample and a
  • small fraction of the sample molecules following their photoexcitation with a femtosecond
  • avoid multiphoton processes, weak probe pulses are usually used, led through the sample
  • laser-interfaced mass spectrometry (LIMS; see Chapter 1.3).
  • molecules. As a gas-phase method, samples are typically vaporized via heating and seeded

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised