Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Timothy D. Scheibe and David C. Mays

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by8 pages
Metals measured2
Evidence tierB
Year2018

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • Groundwater accounts for 99% of the global stock of liquid fresh water (1), and consequently
  • groundwater provides the drinking water supply for an estimated 44% of the population of the United
  • it has high mobility and high toxicity in a broad pH range (1,12,13), and is classified as a Class A
  • range of interest includes values between 5 (acidic) and 9 (alkaline), which can be considered the
  • In this chapter and in Table 1, the principal innovative technologies, which have reached full-scale
  • Table 1. Potential applicability (x: yes; -: no) of innovative technologies depending on the zone and
  • The in situ reduction of Cr (VI) in an unsaturated zone by means of gaseous injections (39) is
  • suitable chemical agents (60,61). In the case of Cr (VI), given its high solubility in water, the use of
  • Table 2 shows the most influential factors on the choice of potentially applicable technologies: pH,
  • Table 3. Low applicability/inapplicability (shown by an “X”) of the innovative technologies examined, according to the factors in Table 2; the zone of potential
  • rates ranging from 20 to 100 mg/L/day. This data suggests other low-partitioning contaminates and
  • has a relatively high solubility in water (Cs = 4.31 × 105 mg/L) and low retardation value (31–33).
  • RDX is a high energy explosive found at numerous military installations and artillery ranges (36).
  • contaminant. RDX has a moderate solubility (CS = 37.5 mg/L at pH 6.2 ◦ C and 20 ◦ C) and a low affinity
  • ranging from 4.3 to 11.0 μg/L (40). GAC has also shown to be a useful material for the removal of RDX
  • 1816 (59). Cr(VI) is relatively soluble, fairly toxic and highly unstable in reducing environments
  • were previously conducted, and average measurement errors for Cr(VI) mass flux of 12% were
  • sorption capacities. Note, Table S1 in the supplemental section summarizes the resins tested.
  • HPLC/ICP-MS. This extraction technique was found to give Cr(VI) recoveries of 87 ± 5% (data not
  • detector. This extraction technique was found to give RDX recoveries of 14 ± 2% (data not shown).
  • ranging from 0 to 8200 mg/L. 0.1 to 10 g of GAC and 0.1 to 5 g of nonionic exchange resin (e.g., Purolite
  • flushed with a contaminant solution consisting of 65 mg/L 1,4-dioxane, 68 mg/L methylene chloride
  • 3000 mg/L SO4 2− solution at a steady solution flow of 0.5 mL/min. Effluent samples were analyzed
  • table was set to a height of 10 cm (28). Coarse gravel was packed at the injection and extraction ends to
  • concentrations ranging from 1000 to 2000 mg/L. The biowall was installed in 2005 and materials used
  • for construction included 42% mulch, 32% sand, 15% gravel and 11% cotton gin waste. The section of
  • increase the iron content from 1600 mg/kg to 120,000 mg/kg to promote biogeochemical reduction of
  • concentrations similar to SS17. The biowall was installed in 2002 and constructed with 50% tree mulch,
  • 10% composted cotton gin waste and 40% river sand. The biowall was amended in 2011 with EVO,
  • agreement since an RDX concentration of 180 μg/L was measured, which is a 3.4% difference from the
  • values based on Purolite A300 and GAC were 83 and 38 μg/L, respectively, which are 1.2% and 74%
  • where n > 1. The Freundlich isotherm model fit for GAC was determined to be Kf = 3.15 and n = 2.11,
  • XAD16 was determined to be Kf = 0.50 and n = 2.37 with E = 0.87. The Freundlich isotherm model fit
  • for XAD4 was determined to be Kf = 0.23 and n = 1.7 with E = 0.99. No fit could be determined for
  • sorption capacity for GAC for 1,4-dioxane (73 mg/g at 838 mg/L Ceq ) was much higher than the other
  • 50% breakthrough and 100% breakthrough and R values for each breakthrough are summarized in
  • Table 1. The R values determined from 50% breakthrough for 1,4-dioxane was 57 time higher than that
  • period. R values determined at initial and 100% breakthroughs showed similar trends. Additionally,
  • the R values calculated on 50% breakthroughs were used to estimate water fluxes from the PFM in the
  • bench-scale aquifer model test discussed below. Note, 50% breakthrough is often the used as a proxy
  • Measured water fluxes averaged 6% higher than actual fluxes. Figure 4B compares the measured and
  • and true cumulative contaminant fluxes. Measured fluxes averaged 8% greater than actual values.

Methods (brief)

  • Diffusion-based samplers inhibit advective transport processes through porous casing material
  • (e.g., water level, groundwater flow rates) (2). Examples of diffusion-based samplers currently
  • used include ceramic dosimeters, bag samplers, dialysis membrane samplers, polyethene samplers,
  • peepers and polymer-based samplers (3–9). However, such samplers have difficulty reaching
  • the depletion layer and the absence of active mixing (10–12). Permeation-based passive samplers
  • rely on groundwater flow to control advective transport processes as it passes through the sampler,
  • while Passive Flux Meters (PFMs) have proven to be the only sampler that is able to effectively measure
  • polypropylene (RPP) diffusion-based passive sampler concentrations of 1,4-dioxane to low-flow
  • purge grab sample concentrations (35). RPP passive samplers detected 1,4-dioxane but appeared to
  • the authors’ knowledge, permeation-based passive samplers for either RDX or 1,4-dioxane have not
  • systems. Jar aquifer tests, assessing RDX uptake into a polyethene diffusion-based passive sampler
  • soil (39). Polar organic chemical integrative samplers (POCIS), diffusion-based samplers, have recently
  • several passive samplers have been developed to monitor Cr(VI). These include passive capillary
  • samplers, suction cup/zero tension lysimeters and NALGENE® polyethylene diffusion-based passive
  • samplers (61,62). The complex chemistry of Cr(VI) in groundwater makes interpretation of field-based
  • transport data difficult to understand, implying diffusion-based samplers may have high uncertainties
  • associated with them (63). Lysimeters and capillary passive samplers are more qualitative than
  • quantitative, as they sample an undefined volume, do not provide flux data and macroporous

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised