Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

evaluated its stabilization performance for vanadium (V), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni),

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by6 pages
Metals measured4
Evidence tierB
Year2026

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • and zinc (Zn) in typical mining soils. Soil samples were amended with 1%, 2%, and 3%
  • transformation, and microbial community responses. At 50 days, the 1% UiO-66-NH2
  • treatment reduced the leaching concentrations of V, Cr, Ni, and Zn by 90.42%, 59.72%,
  • 90.12%, and 90.71%, respectively. Although Cr showed its highest reduction efficiency
  • under the 3% treatment, the 1% dosage provided a practical compromise for multi-metal
  • that a 1% UiO-66-NH2 amendment provides a robust and ecologically compatible strategy
  • multi-metal contamination dominated by V and Cr (Table S1).
  • and amended with UiO-66-NH2 at 1%, 2%, and 3% based on dry soil weight. The untreated
  • at 72 ◦ C. The resulting amplicons were verified via 2% agarose gel electrophoresis, pu-
  • were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at a 97% similarity threshold via
  • 0.177, and 1.624 mg/kg, respectively (Tables S3–S6). These values represent the time-
  • At addition rates of 1–3%, the leaching concentration decreases sharply from 4.645 mg/kg
  • to 0.328–0.345 mg/kg within 10 days, with the passivation efficiency exceeding 92%. How-
  • systematically (0.445–0.554 mg/kg), and the efficiency decreased to 88–90% (Tables S7–S10).
  • leaching concentration decreased as the addition amount increased. At 1% addition, the
  • concentration decreased from 0.0435 mg/kg to 0.0175 mg/kg within 30 days, achieving
  • an efficiency of 59.12%, but by 50 days, the efficiency increased only slightly to 59.72%. At
  • 3% addition, the concentration sharply decreased to 0.0062 mg/kg, with an efficiency of
  • 75.31%, and the efficiency increased to 85.71% at 50 days. These results indicate that Cr
  • reduction efficiency was obtained under the 3% treatment rather than the 1% treatment.
  • stabilization at 1–2% addition. The Ni leaching concentration decreased from 0.1771 mg/kg
  • to 0.0174–0.0202 mg/kg within 40 days, with an efficiency of 88–90% at 50 days, whereas
  • the 1% dosage, the leaching concentration decreased from 1.201 mg/kg to 0.151 mg/kg,
  • decreased to 80–87%, with the 2% treatment showed higher leaching concentrations than
  • In the untreated soil, V was mainly present in the residual fraction (79.67%), with
  • weakly acid-extractable (0.35%) and reducible (13.77%) fractions contributing to potential
  • significantly increased: at a 1% addition, the weakly acid-extractable and reducible fractions
  • decreased by 42.77% and 38.03%, respectively, within 50 days, whereas the residual fraction
  • only slightly increased by 2.77%, and the oxidizable fraction sharply increased by 51.24%.
  • fractions rather than residual fractions. At 2% addition, the weakly acid-extractable and
  • reducible fractions decreased by 43.35% and 34.41%, respectively, while the oxidizable and
  • residual fractions increased by 76.51% and 0.17%, respectively, further confirming that the
  • acid-extractable fraction decreased by 49.50%, reaching a peak, but the residual fraction
  • unexpectedly decreased by 1.79% to 78.24%, while the oxidizable fraction increases to
  • 80.35%. This may be due to the excessive passivation agent forming soluble complexes with
  • low, with the residual fraction accounting for as high as 96.78%. This indicates that
  • highest inhibition rate of 85.71% was achieved after 50 days at a 3% application rate,
  • application rates of 1% and 2%, the weak acid-extractable fraction decreased by 6.67–11.48%,
  • the reducible fraction was drastically reduced by over 95%, and the oxidizable fraction
  • increased significantly by 37.77–64.88%. This transformation from active fractions to the
  • the high application rate of 3%, an anomalous increase of 2.05% was observed in the
  • characteristics (Figure 4c,d). The original residual state of Ni accounts for 90.36%. At

Methods (brief)

  • and zinc (Zn) in typical mining soils. Soil samples were amended with 1%, 2%, and 3%
  • 2.1. Sample Collection and Analysis
  • Heavy-metal-contaminated soil was collected from five sites at a depth of 0–20 cm in
  • Huashan mine in Panzhihua city, Sichuan Province. After collection, the soil samples were
  • ICP-AES results showed that the average concentrations of V, Cr, Ni, and Zn in the
  • contaminated soil collected before UiO-66-NH2 addition was defined as the initial untreated
  • baseline sample. This time-zero sample was used to characterize the initial leaching
  • samples. Total genomic DNA was isolated from soil samples using the E.Z.N.A.® Soil
  • lineages. With sample coverage exceeding 0.99, the sequencing depth captured most of
  • samples identifies it as a potential indicator for UiO-66-NH2 amendment. These patterns

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised