Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Detection of heavy metals concentration in vegetables and

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by8 pages
Metals measured6
Evidence tierB
Year2025

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • Concentration concentration (mg/kg dry weight) of Cd (26.11-26.34), Pb (17-33.84) in all
  • Vegetables children, and Hg (1.727 for children) exceeded the safe limit (<1). The health
  • 90-96% of industries in the city lack any form of treatment facilities, allowing them to discharge wastes into
  • The mean concentration (mg/kg dry weight) of Cr (109.51), Cd (3.14), Pb (129.7), and Zn (148.28)
  • in Akaki River sediment (9). The median heavy metal concentration in mg/L of Akaki Rivers water was Pb
  • for irrigation purposes (10). According to (9), the average concentration of Lead (Pb): 0.775 mg/L, Chromium
  • (Cr): 1 mg/L, Cadmium (Cd): 0.075 mg/L, Nickel (Ni): 0.425 mg/L and Zinc (Zn): 5.75 mg/L in Akaki Rivers
  • all of which were above respective FAO permissible limit for irrigation (0.1 mg/L, 0.1 mg/L, 0.01 mg/L, 0.2
  • were analytical reagent grade. HNO3 (65%), H2O2 (30%), and HClO4 (70%) were used for digestion. Stock
  • standard solutions of 1000 ppm for Cd, Cr, Pb, As, and Hg were used to prepare all calibration curves by
  • solution was prepared by mixing HNO3 (65%), HClO4 (70%), and H2O2 (30%) in a volume ratio of 5:2:2 and
  • addition, the method was evaluated by a spike recovery test, and the mean recovery rate was 90.5% (13). Stock
  • within their expiration date. Each vegetable sample was analyzed in hexaplicate (n = 6), and the mean
  • Where, RFD is reference oral dose values which are 1×10-3, 4×10-3, 1.5, 5×10-4, and 3×10-4 (mg/kg/d) for Cd,
  • The data was analyzed using SPSS version 25, and descriptive analysis was used to calculate the mean
  • and standard deviation of concentration of heavy metals in the samples at a 95% confidence interval, and One-
  • 3.1. Heavy metal contents in vegetable samples
  • The mean concentration with SD of Cd, Cr, Pb, As, and Hg in hexaplicate (n = 6) samples of beetroot,
  • Table 1. The mean concentration of Cd ranged from (17 to 33.84 mg/kg), which was higher than the
  • recommended limit (0.2 mg/kg) (17). This is likely due to cadmium accumulation in plants through
  • Cd (19). The concentration of Cd in all vegetable samples was greater than (6.03 and 6.43 mg/kg) in tomato
  • All vegetable samples had around 26 mg/kg of lead concentration, which was by far above the
  • areas. The mean concentration of Cd and Pb was also significantly higher than the concentration of Cd: (1.06
  • The concentration (mg/kg) of Hg in beetroot (0.124), potato (0.025) and tomato (0.047) samples were a
  • little bit exceeded the stipulate limit, 0.02 mg/kg (21). It was accumulated more in beetroot, which might be due
  • concentration of Hg (3.430 and 4.230 mg/kg) in tomato and cabbage samples collected from Koka areas
  • respectively investigated by (15). Chromium (Cr) concentration was below the detection limit (<0,001 mg/kg)
  • and within safe limit (2.3 mg/kg) set by WHO/FAO (23). Chromium can be found in Cr (III) and Cr (VI) forms.
  • (0.1 mg/kg) (23), because the rivers might not be contaminated with arsenic which likely due to absence of mining
  • into their leaves (21). The mean concentration of Pd was not significantly different across vegetable samples.
  • This might be due to all vegetables had equivalent absorption and accumulation rate for Pb (17). The mean
  • ANOVA). This might be due to Cd and Pb are not equally absorbed and translocated by all vegetables (19).
  • Figure 2 as presented Cd and Pb concentration variation with in and across vegetables.
  • Table 1. Heavy metals concentration in vegetable samples
  • Figure 2. Cd and Pb concentration variation with in and across vegetables
  • intakes were Cd and Pb by children with all studied vegetables as showed in Table 2. This is due to their smaller
  • doses (RFD) (question 2). If HRI<1, means that it is unlikely to going to pose a population health risk but HRI
  • ≥ 1 means that the consumers are going to in pose to health risk (26). In this study, the estimated HRI for adults
  • who consumed beetroot with Hg were above safe limit as shown in Table 2.
  • Children faced higher health risk due to cadmium than adults Table 2. Consumption of cabbage by
  • children posed the highest risk (140.96), likely because leafy vegetables accumulate more cadmium (27).
  • (31), who assessed the potential health risk of heavy metals via consumption of rice and vegetables grown in

Methods (brief)

  • Following the vegetable sample collection, a laboratory-based study was used
  • Akaki Rivers in sample processing, digestion, and heavy metal detection. Mean
  • Health risk samples, and Hg (0.124) in beetroot exceeded the permissible limits set by
  • cabbage, potato, and tomato samples irrigated by the Akaki Rivers and (2) evaluate the potential human health
  • Atomic absorption spectrometer (AAS) novAA 800 was used to measure the concentration of Cd, Cr,
  • Pb, As and Hg in vegetable samples. AAS is a quantitative analytical instrument used to identify approximately
  • sample. The atoms absorb light from a hollow cathode lamp (HCL) energy source, and the reduction in light
  • intensity detected is proportional to the concentration of the element in the sample (11). All chemicals used
  • were analytical reagent grade. HNO3 (65%), H2O2 (30%), and HClO4 (70%) were used for digestion. Stock
  • diluting to known concentrations (12). Distilled water was used for sample preparation and dilution purposes
  • 2.3. Sample collection and preparation
  • tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Miller) samples were collected from farmlands irrigated by the Akaki Rivers
  • in dry months (January and February). A total of twenty-four samples, twelve from each of the Great and Little
  • Akkaki River sites, and six samples for each vegetable type were selected and collected by a stratified random
  • sampling method. Sub-samples as a representative fraction of the vegetables were used to prepare each of the
  • samples in a composite sample form (5).
  • Samples were washed with tap water to remove soil and other dirt and rinsed with distilled water to
  • remove adsorbed elements. The samples were cut into small pieces and dried using the dry oven (Memmert

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised