Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

oxidation of infant formula powder

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by7 pages
Metals measured2
Evidence tierB
Year2023

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • Approximately 50% of the fat in infant formula powders (IFs) a crucial role in enhancing infant development, including
  • DHA and ARA (DHA ≤0.2% and ARA ≤0.54% of total fatty
  • (measured using thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance values, mL) trichloroacetic acid (TCA) in water and 2 mL 95% ethanol
  • dose of DHA and ARA on the oxidative stability of IFs. (1.4 g 2-thiobarbituric acid in 95% ethanol to 100 mL) was
  • (Bright Dairy & Food Co., Ltd). The first type (IF1) is infant of IFs (accurate to 0.01 g); 2.0 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution was
  • ARA, 180 mg per 100 g of milk powder per formula).The for­ (99.999%) was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of
  • product was controlled to be less than 3%. 230°C, quadrupole temperature 150°C, detector tempera­
  • 1.2 kV, and the quality scanning range was m/z 50–450.
  • products were kept at 37°C (75% relative humidity) for 6 the volatiles were determined using the NIST library (ver­
  • Tables 1–3 display the composition of UFAs in IFs at 0, 2, 4, the 6-month storage period (Table 3). In addition, during the
  • DHA and ARA remained stable in both infant and follow-up DHA and ARA in IF3-L, whereas there was a significant
  • Values are the mean of two measurements. IF1, infant formula (for infants aged 0–6 months). For each row considered, values of the same formula with the
  • same letter are not statistically different at the 5% level (ANOVA test). UFA, unsaturated fatty acids; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA,
  • Values are the mean of two measurements. IF2, follow-up infant formula (for infants aged 6–12 months). For each row considered, values of the same formula
  • with the same letter are not statistically different at the 5% level (ANOVA test). UFA, unsaturated fatty acids; MUFA, follow-upmonounsaturated fatty acids;
  • Values are the mean of two measurements. IF3, young children formula (for young children aged 12 to 36 months). For each row considered, values of the same
  • formula with the same letter are not statistically different at the 5% level (ANOVA test). UFA, unsaturated fatty acids; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids;
  • a significant decrease in all fatty acids, while other fatty acids, a sharp 20% decrease in vitamin C in IFs stored at 37°C for
  • 4.7%, respectively. These trends align with findings reported different storage durations. The highest TBARS values for all
  • mg α-TE/100 g, experienced losses of 4.8% and 6.5%, respec­ measurements. ANOVA analysis indicated that in the sixth
  • TE/100 g, the losses were 8.2% and 12.3%, respectively. This cantly higher than their initial levels., Some specific formulas,
  • research suggests that lower initial vitamin E content in IFs such as IF1-H, IF2-L, and IF2-H, exhibited a notable increase in
  • were 3.9%, 5.7%, 6.0%, 6.0%, 7.7%, and 6.1%, respectively. have used TBARS to assess the stability of milk powder and
  • stored at 40°C for 6 months, vitamin C decreased by approxi­ an effective means of evaluating product oxidation status
  • mately 12.5%. However, the findings slightly differ from (Semeniuc, 2009). As shown in Table 4, during the storage of
  • 5% level (ANOVA test). * There is a significant difference compared to the corresponding formula (p < .05).
  • et al., 2008). As shown in Tables 1–3, the highest content of study, some VOCs were observed in samples stored only in
  • using IF3-L and IF3-H (Table 4), which indicates that IF3-L and safety area. Universul Juridic, Supplement, 12–15
  • in IFs, with only IF3-H showing a notable decrease in DHA and Bondoc, I. (2016d). European regulation in the veterinary sanitary and
  • vegetable-oils. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, 70(8),

Methods (brief)

  • et al., 2003), and the stability of products with different reported HPLC method reported by Chávez-Servín (Chávez-
  • 2.1. Sample preparation
  • IF2 and IF3, were produced by wet mixing-spray-drying process In a sample bottle with a capacity of 20 mL were placed 1.5 g
  • ing 3.41 g of linoleic acid and 0.442 g of α-Linolenic acid). The desorption at 250°C in the gas phase sampler for 5 min.
  • months. Samples were taken at 0, 2, 4, and 6 months to sion 17.0) and the Wiley MS library. The spectrum of
  • Tables 1–3 and section 2.1. Sample preparation, the percen­ Vitamin C and vitamin E are added to IFs, both to improve
  • Figure 1. Vitamin E and vitamin C content of the analyzed samples.
  • et al., 2008). As shown in Tables 1–3, the highest content of study, some VOCs were observed in samples stored only in
  • the fat content, the more types of VOCs can be detected showed that samples low in DHA and ARA were separated
  • infant formula) and (c) IF3 (young children formula). Each sample has been analyzed in triplicates.
  • formula) and (c) IF3 (young children formula). Each sample has been analyzed in triplicates.
  • time was clearly observed for all four samples. A similar result References
  • Comparison of mass spectrometry-based electronic nose and solid
  • phase microextraction gas chromatography–mass spectrometry tech­
  • las and human milk during two-phase in vitro digestion. Food &
  • Brightdairy (Shanghai, China) for providing the samples of infant for­ Diéguez, E., Jiménez, J., De Castellar, R., García-Ricobaraza, M.,
  • (USA), 62(2), 331–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1997. spectrometry and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Food

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised