Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Heavy Metals and Essential Metals Are Associated with

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by10 pages
Metals measured7
Evidence tierB
Year2023

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • patients (4–6). Here, in the first place, we mean metals that are present in the body under
  • Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 467 Fe (Figure 4), S, K, Se, Co, Mn, Ni, Na, Mg, Tl, and Li (Table 1). 3 of 28
  • in Table 1. Macro‐ and microelements that correlated with the high number of CSF AD
  • Fe (Figure 4), S, K, Se, Co, Mn, Ni, Na, Mg, Tl, and Li (Table 1).
  • in Table 1. Macro- and microelements that correlated with the high number of CSF AD
  • Fe (Figure 4), S, K, Se, Co, Mn, Ni, Na, Mg, Tl, and Li (Table 1).
  • Table 1. Correlations of CSF AD biomarkers with macro- and microelements.
  • eters that were classified into 6 groups (factors) after analysis (Table 2). Factors explained
  • 73.2% of the total variance in analyzed CSF macro- and microelements (with Bartlett’s
  • were classified into six groups (factors) after analysis (Table 3). Factors explained 66.1%
  • Table 2. CSF macro- and microelements and their factor loadings for 6 groups (factors) (given by
  • Table 3. Plasma macro- and microelements and their factor loadings for 6 groups (factors) (given by
  • analysis of CSF macro- and microelements with CSF AD biomarkers are given in Table 4
  • in Table 5 and Figure 7. The most interesting finding is that following PCA heavy metals
  • Table 4. Results of linear regression analysis; comparison of factors obtained by PCA of CSF macro-
  • 95% confidence intervals are given by linear regression analysis (statistically significant factors are
  • Table 5. Results of linear regression analysis; comparison of factors obtained by PCA of plasma
  • and 95% confidence intervals are given by linear regression analysis
  • ment groups revealed by the PCA. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals are given by linear
  • significant 95% confidence intervals
  • microelements measured in CSF (Table 6), and plasma (Table 7), as well as an association
  • plasma (Table 7). Information on age, Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE), and APOE
  • microelements measured in CSF (Table 6), and plasma (Table 7), as well as an association
  • plasma (Table 7). Information on age, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and APOE
  • were extracted (Table 6, Table 7). When analyzing the association of CSF AD biomarkers
  • Table 6. Most significant redescriptions given by the combination of CSF AD biomarkers (first view—W1) and macro- and microelements measured in CSF (second
  • Redescription Specific for: HC (%) MCI (%) AD (%) W1R W2R JS p-Value
  • Redescription Specific for: HC (%) MCI (%) AD (%) W1R W2R JS p-Value
  • Redescription Specific for: HC (%) MCI (%) AD (%) W1R W2R JS p-Value
  • Redescription Specific for: HC (%) MCI (%) AD (%) W1R W2R JS p-Value
  • Data are presented as percentages of diagnoses and ranges of CSF biomarkers and elements. W1R refers to the first redescription query (constructed using attributes from the first
  • Table 7. Most significant redescriptions given by the combination of CSF AD biomarkers (first view—W1) with macro- and microelements measured in plasma
  • Redescription Specific for: HC (%) MCI (%) AD (%) W1R W2R JS p-Value
  • AD 0% 8.6% 30.1% Age (49–82) Li in plasma (15–48) 0.64583 2.475 × 10−8 *
  • AD 0% 5.7% 32.3% MMSE (5–28) Li in plasma (15–32) 0.51613 4.924 × 10−6 *
  • Redescription Specific for: HC (%) MCI (%) AD (%) W1R W2R JS p-Value
  • AD 6.6% 22.9% 45.2% T-tau (313.77–2259) Ca in plasma (73.6–90.4) 0.54839 0.001 *
  • AD&MCI 6.6% 45.7% 45.2% Age (49–83) Pb in plasma (103.9–223.7) 0.56731 0.006 *
  • AD&MCI 0% 22.8% 41.9% Age (49–82) Mn in plasma (0.83–2.35) 0.63514 4.880 × 10−6 *
  • AD&MCI 6.6% 48% 43% Age (49–83) Co in plasma (0.26–1.07) 0.55769 0.007 *
  • Redescription Specific for: HC (%) MCI (%) AD (%) W1R W2R JS p-Value
  • AD&MCI 6.6% 31.4% 46.2% p-tau181 (21.6–319.16) Mo in plasma (0.72–12.02) 0.55556 0.003 *

Methods (brief)

  • 10 Nash Family Department of Neuroscience, Friedman Brain Institute, Ronald M. Loeb Center for
  • spectroscopy (ICP-MS) to determine macro- and microelements in CSF and plasma, and enzyme-
  • 4.1. Participants and Sample Collection
  • MCI (88,89), and 19 were HC. CSF samples were collected from all participants by lumbar
  • 2000× g for 10 min, CSF samples were aliquoted in polypropylene tubes and stored at
  • −80 ◦ C. Venous blood samples were collected from 143 participants in the morning on an
  • empty stomach. Samples were collected using plastic syringes (with 1 mL of acid citrate
  • dextrose as an anticoagulant). Thrombocyte-free plasma was collected by centrifugation,
  • first at 1100× g for 3 min and then at 5087 g for 15 min. Plasma samples were stored
  • Inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) was used for the measure-
  • the samples with Cr from the needles used for sample collection, it was excluded from
  • statistical analysis. ICP-MS was performed on Agilent 7500cx (Agilent Technologies, Tokyo,
  • Japan). Before the analysis, CSF samples were diluted at 1:10, while plasma samples were
  • Shield Plate system and Ni sampler and skimmer cones. Daily optimization of ICP-MS
  • HEPA filters were used for sample preparation and analysis. Quantification of elements
  • concentration in samples was done by the standard addition method (matrix-matched
  • test items and sample size for factor analysis was assessed by Bartlett’s χ2 test of sphericity
  • enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; Fe, iron; HC, healthy controls; Hg, mercury; ICP-MS,

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised