Overview
This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.
Key numbers
The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:
- with three commercial checks viz., Arka different PEG-6000 concentrations of 0, 4%,
- Rakshak, US-440 and NS-516 were screened 8%, 12% and 16%. The analysis of variance
- of paper towel (11 × 11 cm) previously (Table 2). Significant differences were
- plastic tray with different concentrations (4%, concentrations, EC-620407 × EC-620557
- 8%, 12% and 16%) of Polyethylene Glycol recorded significantly maximum germination
- (PEG-6000). Germination percentage was percentage (80.57%) compared to all other
- 21st day, final germination per cent, lowest (38.91%) in the cross EC-619982 ×
- recorded in Polyethylene Glycol (PEG-6000) was found non-significant. In 4%
- is external water stress treatments. The sheets percentages. While at 8% concentration of
- germinated when the emerging radicle respectively. In case of 12% concentration of
- Saurabh (77.70%), EC-620360 × Pusa Ruby PEG-6000 concentrations was found
- (26.20%) had responded as maximum and significant. In 4% concentration of PEG-
- respectively. With 16% concentration of rate was recorded in EC-620428 × Arka
- (73.21%) responded maximum and minimum Saurabh (3.53) genotype respectively. While
- observed that germination percentage with case of 12% concentration of PEG-6000,
- 6000 makes water unavailable to seeds, while with 16% maximum and minimum
- different PEG-6000 concentrations (Table 3). Root plays a major role in plant survival
- significantly maximum germination rate (Table 4). Significant differences were
- In case of 12% concentration of PEG-6000, drought stress.
- root length respectively. In case of 16% plant to drought stress (Zhu et al., 2006).
- Table.1 Analysis of variance for six characters in tomato
- concentrations (Table 5). Irrespective of the root dry weight was lowest (2.43) in the
- length (6.85 cm) compared to all other concentrations was found significant. In 4%
- significant. In 4% concentration of PEG-6000, respectively. While at 8% concentration of
- genotype respectively. While at 8% minimum root dry weight respectively. In case
- respectively. In case of 16% concentration of root dry weight respectively
- mg) compared to all other genotypes (Table 7). physiological investigation is needed for
- significant. In 4% concentration of PEG-6000, 4014-4017.
- respectively. While at 8% concentration of African Crop Science Conference
- of 12 % concentration of PEG-6000, genotypes International of Journal Agricultural
- dry weight respectively. In case of 16 % Garcia-Hernandez and Francisco H. Ruiz-
- Pena, R.D.L. and Hughes J. 2007. Improving Evaluation of tomato germpasm adaptable
Methods (brief)
- drought resistance in tomato. ICPSBC- method of seedling screening for drought
Implications
This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.
Wiki pages this source may touch
Verification notes
- Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing
wiki/sources/pages before creation. - Full-PDF read:
pdftotext -layoutwas run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written. - Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
- Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
- HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.
Update history
The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.