Overview
This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the methylmercury infant-formula research pull. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.
Key numbers
The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:
- Vegetable Acceptance from 5 Months to 6
- Andrea Maier-Nöth1¤, Benoist Schaal2,3,4, Peter Leathwood1, Sylvie Issanchou2,3,4*
- a11111 des Sciences du Goût et de l’Alimentation, F-21000, Dijon, France, 3 INRA, UMR1324 Centre des Sciences
- du Goût et de l’Alimentation, F-21000, Dijon, France, 4 Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UMR Centre des
- Sciences du Goût et de l’Alimentation, F-21000, Dijon, France
- Issanchou S (2016) The Lasting Influences of Early
- Study of Vegetable Acceptance from 5 Months to 6 need to identify strategies that can successfully promote better acceptance of vegetables.
- Years in Two Populations. PLoS ONE 11(3): Recently, experimental studies have reported promising interventions that increase accep-
- e0151356. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151356
- disliked vegetable at 8 subsequent meals markedly increased acceptance for that vegeta-
- Received: October 6, 2015 ble. So far, these effects have been shown to persist for at least several weeks. We now
- Published: March 11, 2016 3y) and experimental (6y) approaches. At 15 months, participants who had been breast-fed
- Copyright: © 2016 Maier-Nöth et al. This is an open
- Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits and eaten by 79% of the children. At 3 years, the initially disliked vegetable was still liked
- unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any and eaten by 73% of the children. At 6 years, observations in an experimental setting
- groups. The initially disliked vegetable was still liked by 57% of children. This follow-up
- PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0151356 March 11, 2016 1 / 17
- infants more rapidly accepted a new vegetable than formula-fed infants (6–8), and experience
- ONE policies on sharing data and materials. a few weeks later (7, 9). If these effects lasted for months and years then they might provide
- Breastfeeding is also associated with positive effects on later eating patterns (10–17). Breast-
- (18). Besides this specific flavor-learning effect, breastmilk per se seems to favor acceptance of
- high variety of vegetable purées at the onset of complementary feeding lasted for at least 2
- months (7). Breastfeeding and early experience with flavor variety at the very beginning of
- that vegetable (8, 19, 20). For example, offering a new vegetable on 10 consecutive days to 4–6
- month old infants led to a marked increase in intake between the first and the 10th day (8).
- Parents asked to get their child to taste a previously disliked vegetable each day for 14 days
- reported a marked increase in liking for, and consumption of, the target vegetable (20). Simi-
- larly, when a well-liked vegetable and an initially disliked vegetable were given to 7-month-old
- infants on alternate days over 16 days, by the 8th exposure to each, intake and liking of the two
- were similar (19). Nine months later, most of the infants were still consuming and liking the
- previously disliked vegetable (19). This persistence of increased acceptance was confirmed in
- children aged between 15 and 56 months, where repeated exposure to a new vegetable
- increased its intake 1 month and 6 months later. The effect of repeated exposure was more
- dren (21). Moreover, repeated exposure was sufficient to increase intake of a novel vegetable,
- infants who participated in the two earlier studies described above (7, 19). The objective was to
- evaluate the persistence of increased acceptance of vegetables at about 15 months, 3 and 6
- PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0151356 March 11, 2016 2 / 17
- bles offered and the number of vegetables eaten and liked by the child. At 6 years of age, con-
- ing should (a) accept more vegetables later on and (b) accept new vegetables more readily; (2)
- In the initial study there were 147 mother-infant dyads; 75 from Aalen in Germany and 72
- from Dijon in France (7). Infants’ age at the start of the study was 5.2±0.1 months (mean ± stan-
- Drop outs at these three time-points were fewer in Aalen (19%, 24%, and 41%) than in Dijon
Methods (brief)
- included only the results for the sub-sample of children participating at each of the 3 follow-up
- Table 1. Characteristics of the Dijon sample split by mode of milk feeding and variety exposure group.
- Information about foods offered and food acceptance was collected using parent-completed
- Table 2. Characteristics of the Aalen sample split by mode of milk feeding and variety exposure group.
- pated were representative samples of those who took part in the initial study (S1 Fig).
- considerable practical implications. As noted earlier with a large US sample (38), a majority of
- data collected when the infants were weanlings, but using only those infants who later on par-
- intervention for the initial sample and for the samples of infants participating at each fol-
- the initial sample, p = 0.06 at follow-up 1, p = 0.05 at follow-up 2 and p = 0.09 at follow-up 3).
- S1 Table. Chi-2 values for the comparisons of the Dijon and Aalen samples of children par-
- ticipating at each follow-up with the initial sample of children in terms of frequency for
Implications
This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.
Wiki pages this source may touch
Verification notes
- Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing
wiki/sources/pages before creation. - Full-PDF read:
pdftotext -layoutwas run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written. - Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
- Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
- HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.
Update history
The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.