Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Potential Health Effects Associated with Dermal Exposure to Occupational

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by8 pages
Metals measured4
Evidence tierB
Year2014

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • 10% of total body mass. It is a very complex and dynamic respiratory tract. Systemic toxicity occurs when skin expo-
  • barrier protection, water preservation, tactile sensation, ther- occupational illnesses accounting for approximately 90–95%
  • deposition of aerosols, immersion, or splashes and can often data indicate that ICD represents approximately 70–80%
  • Types of Disease occupational illness accounting for 10–15% of all occupational
  • range of other adverse health effects.17 In general, there are the allergic response; and the elicitation phase, which is
  • comprise ,10% of occupational skin disease and include non- Historically, the main goal of the skin notation is to communi-
  • association of chemical exposures with other types of systemic artificial nails were identified as 80% of all occupational cases
  • between 27.3 and 72.7%, and 20.0 and 51.1%, respectively, diethanolamine) have also been identified as common sources
  • and hair-coloring preparations at concentrations up to 60%. 37 chial asthma and serous papules, and urticaria after working
  • test to these compounds in 20% of the patients and identified bation.64,65 Animal studies support these findings and suggest
  • compounds in 85% of the subjects who tested positive.50 Con- adjuvant and enhance allergic responses to an known aller-
  • repetitive glove use are significant factors in development of 50% of the world labor force, and these numbers are expected
  • for the initiation of cutaneous immune responses, including accounted for 32% of total world pesticide expenditures.68
  • be between 20 and 30% among workers who handle MWF, butyl benzyl phthalate (BBzP; vinyl tiles, traffic cones, food
  • much higher than the 4% prevalence recorded among the gen- conveyor belts, artificial leather, and plastic foams), diisodecyl
  • levels detected in the majority of the population.114 It is used patch testing of 4,454 patients, nickel sulfate (19.0%), cobalt
  • in the productions of plastics and epoxy resins, and is used in chloride (8.4%), and potassium dichromate (4.8%) were among
  • population.116 exposure as a result of a chemical burn of 15% of the body
  • which lend them to be useful in consumer and industrial as 12%.127 In some of the exposed individuals, beryllium sen-

Methods (brief)

  • pyrethroids, neonicotinoids, and ryanoids. Organophosphos- workers were collected as part of a community-based partici-
  • There are more than 40 organophosphate pesticides registered sure compared with those of a national reference sample.82 In
  • pancreatic, bladder, brain, and prostate.105 In many cases, little metabolites can be detected in urine samples of the majority of
  • and trade secrets; however, analytical techniques can be used analyzing their metabolites in urine samples from workers
  • nyl butyral tested positive in the LLNA and was identified and particle deposition. Skin wipes were collected from the
  • to wet work in nurses. Contact Dermatitis. 2004;50:225–9. 82. Salvatore AL, Bradman A, Castorina R, et al. Occupational behaviors and

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised