Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

This page reports published measurements and their limitations. Compare values only when the product form, measurement basis, and metal species match.

10 related source records are associated with this category. This is a coverage count, not a measure of scientific confidence. References identify works cited in the text.

Overview

This page is a scaffolded entry for HMTc Taxonomy v2.0 Category 11 (Meat, Poultry, and Eggs), Row 2: Pork. Studies for this row are still being read. Where a section is empty, the row has not yet accumulated contributing sources of the required kind.

Reading guide

Legal, regulatory and retailer teams can use the cited measurements, applicable limits and study limitations to assess the evidence for this category.

Quality teams can examine product form, measurement basis and sources of variation. Journalists and researchers can follow each reference to the original findings and methods.

Related tools and pages: heavymetalcertified.com · methodology

Evidence summary

Evidence summary

The table below summarizes what the peer-reviewed and government literature cited on this page reports for heavy-metal concentrations in Pork. Values are pulled directly from cited sources without re-aggregation. This page publishes literature evidence only, not certification thresholds.

Methodology rules for speciation, basis preservation, non-detect handling, and source pooling are stated in the Methodology section above and apply to every row below.

AnalyteSubcategoryReported concentration rangeDetection rateApplicable regulatory capSourcesConfidenceBasis
PbPork (no contributing evidence loaded)No concentration data loaded for this analyteSample-level detection rate not reportedNo applicable cap loaded0data gapBasis not reported
CdPork (no contributing evidence loaded)No concentration data loaded for this analyteSample-level detection rate not reportedNo applicable cap loaded0data gapBasis not reported
tAsPork (no contributing evidence loaded)No concentration data loaded for this analyteSample-level detection rate not reportedNo applicable cap loaded0data gapBasis not reported
NiPork (no contributing evidence loaded)No concentration data loaded for this analyteSample-level detection rate not reportedNo applicable cap loaded0data gapBasis not reported
CrPork (no contributing evidence loaded)No concentration data loaded for this analyteSample-level detection rate not reportedNo applicable cap loaded0data gapBasis not reported

Source Evidence Inventory

Sources for this row will be listed here once they are catalogued.

Supporting evidence and scope

Broader-scope sources for this row will be listed here when they are catalogued.

Federal/Regulatory Limits vs Field Findings

Regulatory limits for this row will be listed here once they are catalogued.

Controls and mitigation

Practical interventions to reduce heavy-metal load in this row, ordered by impact magnitude. Each lever names the magnitude of the effect with a cited source; cross-links to dedicated Mitigation pages where they exist.

How standards math uses this page

HMT&C certification thresholds for this row are developed under the certification program at heavymetalcertified.com, not on this page. The row-standard for this row is an aggregate computed from the contributing source pool in the row’s native finished-product basis; it is not a per-source decoration of any single value cited on this page. This public page reports literature evidence only.

Historical recalls and enforcement

Public regulatory events for this row, such as recalls and import alerts, will be listed here as they are catalogued.

Methodology

This page reports what the cited sources say about heavy-metal concentrations in pork. Speciation is non-substitutable (iAs vs tAs, MeHg vs tHg, Cr-VI vs total Cr). Basis is preserved (finished-product as sold unless the source specifies otherwise; see each row for the basis label). Non-detect handling follows each source’s reporting convention. Pooling is avoided across LOD/LOQ, period, geography, and analytical-basis differences. HMT&C certification thresholds for products in this row are developed under the certification program at heavymetalcertified.com, not on this page; this public page reports literature evidence only.

The applicable regulatory jurisdictions for this row are: FDA, USDA (meat/poultry inspection), EU, Codex.

Sources

Sources for this row will be listed here once they are catalogued.

Sources

Source records associated with this topic. Inclusion does not establish that every finding applies to this product or ingredient. References above identify works cited in the text.

#CitationYearTypeUsed on this page for
1Zhang et al. 2022. Risk assessment of heavy metals contamination in pork, Food Control2022Peer-reviewedCN Pb, tAs, Cd, tHg occurrence in Secondary aggregation of previously published Chinese pork heavy-metal concentration records from CNKI: 42 Pb records, 36 Cd records,… (n=126)
2Maikanov et al. 2021. Assessment of quality and safety of meats from various animal species in the Shuchinsk-Burabay resort zone, Kazakhstan, Veterinary World 14(6):1615-16212021Peer-reviewedKZ tAs, Cd, tHg, Pb occurrence in Meat from markets in the Shuchinsk-Burabay resort zone: beef 166, horse 42, pork 67, mutton 8, poultry 15. (n=298)
3Buba et al. 2020. Determination of Some Heavy Metals in Kidney, Liver and Muscle of Domestic Pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) in Guyuk Metropolis, Adamawa State, Nigeria, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation2020Peer-reviewedNG Pb, Fe, Cd, Ni, Cu occurrence in Domestic pig kidney, liver, and muscle samples bought from ten (10) commercial sellers in Guyuk Metropolis, Adamawa State,… (n=10)
4Di et al. 2020. Heavy Metals and PAHs in Meat, Milk, and Seafood From Augusta Area (Southern Italy): Contamination Levels, Dietary Intake, and Human Exposure Assessment, Frontiers in Public Health 8:2732020Peer-reviewedIT/EU tAs, Cd, Cr, tHg, Ni, Pb, Zn occurrence in Meat, milk, and seafood from the Augusta-Melilli-Priolo industrial area in Southern Italy; seafood pooled across fish, mollusc, and… (n=Seafood from the Augusta Bay/Sicily study area plus terrestrial animal products from 26 farms: 5 bovine milk, 11 sheep/goat milk, 11 beef, and 3 pork samples.)
5Wang et al. 2020. Contamination and health risk assessment of lead, arsenic, cadmium, and aluminum from a total diet study of Jilin Province, China, Food Science & Nutrition2020Peer-reviewedCN Pb, tAs, Cd, Al occurrence in Jilin Province total-diet-study composites across 12 food groups and 48 product groups, with consumption inputs for 7700 residents…
6Liang et al. 2019. Analysis of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs and an Assessment of the Health Risks to the General Public via Consumption in Beijing, China, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health2019Peer-reviewedCN Pb, Cd, Cr, tAs, tHg occurrence in Beijing general population; 25 foodstuff types collected from four sites, three replicates per foodstuff at each site (n=300)
7Wang et al. 2019. Dietary Lead Exposure and Associated Health Risks in Guangzhou, China, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health2019Peer-reviewedCN Pb occurrence in Food safety risk monitoring samples from Guangzhou, China, collected during 2014-2017 across 27 food categories; consumption inputs came… (n=6339)
8Paulsen et al. 2015. Pilot study on metal contents in meat portions from wild game killed by ‘lead-free’ rifle bullets, Journal of Food Safety and Food Quality2015Peer-reviewedAT Pb, Cu, Zn occurrence in roe deer, wild boar, and pork meat portions assessed for digested and undigested metal fractions
9Hoha et al. 2014. Heavy metals contamination levels in processed meat marketed in Romania, Environmental Engineering and Management Journal2014Peer-reviewedRO Pb, Cd occurrence in Bacon (n=6), ham (n=6), sausage (n=12), and salami (n=12) purchased from four commercial centers in Iasi, Romania; produced… (n=36)
10Buculei et al. 2012. Study regarding the tin and iron migration from metallic cans into foodstuff during storage, Journal of Agroalimentary Processes and Technologies, 18(4), 299-3032012Peer-reviewedRO Sn, Fe occurrence in Four canned product types (peas, tomato paste, pork in own juice, pork liver pate) packed in three-piece tinplate… (n=4)

Update history

No substantive edit history is available in this build. The full commit record is available in git.