Non-dairy creamer
Completeness scorecard
Deterministic gap audit — no score is composite, no cell is LLM-judged. Each chip is re-derivable by re-running tools/evidence/build-ingredient-scorecard.mjs. review: residuals and missing data are worked autonomously via data/evidence/ingredient-scorecard-review-flags.csv and wiki/completeness-gaps.md.
| Dimension | Status | What’s there (auditable counts) | What’s missing |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 Analyte coverage (tier: unset) | tier-unset | 5/10 HMTc analytes, total n=14 | consumption tier unset; depth bar uncheckable |
| D2 Regional coverage | below-tier | 0 jurisdictions | only 0 distinct jurisdiction(s) |
| D3 Anthropogenic evidence | GAP | no upstream/attribution sources | link a supply-chain/ hub page |
| D4 Background mechanism | GAP | section present, 0 drivers, 0 upstream source(s) | drivers[] empty; no upstream source to substantiate |
| D5 Pooling depth | THIN | Pb THIN, Cd THIN, tAs THIN, tHg THIN, Ni THIN, Cr THIN, U THIN | Pb: needs 1 more study(ies); Cd: needs 1 more study(ies); tAs: needs 1 more study(ies); tHg: needs 1 more study(ies); Ni: needs 1 more study(ies); Cr: needs 1 more study(ies); U: needs 1 more study(ies) |
| D6 Speciation | OK | iAs, tAs, tHg declared | — |
| D7 Basis declaration | GAP | 0/10 populated cells declare a basis token | 10 populated cell(s) lack a basis token: Pb, Cd, iAs, tAs, tHg, Ni, Al, Cr, Sn, U |
| D8 Provenance integrity | GAP | 0 claims checked, 0 supported; 1 citations, 0 orphan, 1 foreign | 1 foreign citation(s) not naming non-dairy-creamer: fda2022-tds-elements-fy2018-fy2020 |
| D9 Mitigation | GAP | 0 cited lever(s), 0 mitigation/ link(s) | section present but no source-cited lever |
| D10 Regulatory coverage | OK | 1 rule link(s), 6 metal(s) covered | unmapped analytes: Ni, Cr, U |
| D11 Standards-readiness | NOT-READY | priority: Pb, Cd, tAs, tHg, Ni, Cr, U; pairing 0 paired, 7 single, 0 unpaired | Pb: THIN, needs 1 more study(ies); Cd: THIN, needs 1 more study(ies); tAs: THIN, needs 1 more study(ies); tHg: THIN, needs 1 more study(ies); Ni: THIN, needs 1 more study(ies); Cr: THIN, needs 1 more study(ies); U: THIN, needs 1 more study(ies); basis: 10 populated cell(s) lack a basis token: Pb, Cd, iAs, tAs, tHg, Ni, Al, Cr, Sn, U; consumption tier unset (depth bar uncheckable) |
| Principle balance | flag | consumer-protection 0.75, contamination-reduction 0.00, brand-value 0.00, legal-defensibility 0.38, scale 0.25 | spread 0.75 — starved: contamination-reduction |
This ingredient stub was created during the FDA FY2018-FY2020 Total Diet Study element-results ingest so future source ingests have a stable destination for this food matrix. FDA reports this item as TDS Food 168, “Cream substitute, non-dairy, liquid.” fda2022-tds-elements-fy2018-fy2020
Why this commodity accumulates heavy metals
Non-dairy creamer is a formulated product rather than a primary agricultural commodity, and its heavy metal profile reflects the aggregate of its constituent ingredients rather than any single accumulation pathway. Commercial non-dairy creamers are predominantly composed of refined vegetable oils (typically partially hydrogenated soybean or palm oil), corn syrup or glucose syrup, sodium caseinate (a milk-protein derivative), and a range of emulsifiers, stabilizers, and flavorings. Refined vegetable oils carry very low metal concentrations because the refining process (degumming, neutralization, bleaching, deodorization) removes most metal-containing phospholipids and impurities from the crude oil. Corn syrup derived from refined starch hydrolysis similarly carries few metals into the finished product. Sodium caseinate, derived from skim milk, reflects the low metal profile of fluid milk. The net effect is that non-dairy creamer has one of the lower heavy metal profiles among processed food categories. FDA TDS FY2018-FY2020 data fda2022-tds-elements-fy2018-fy2020 support this characterization: all analytes measured (Cd, Cr, Ni, Pb, tAs, tHg, and U) were reported at or below detection limits in the three composite samples collected for this food item.
Heavy metal contamination profile
Per-analyte snapshot derived from the machine-readable contamination_profile in the frontmatter above. data gap indicates the literature has been reviewed for this commodity-analyte combination and no usable occurrence data was found (a finding, not a placeholder). The Key sources column shows the top 2-3 contributing sources by year and sample size, with numbered wikilink aliases.
| Analyte | Coverage | Typical (ppb) | p95 (ppb) | Confidence | Key sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | n=2 | 0 | 0 | low | 1 |
| Cd | n=2 | 0 | 0 | low | 1 |
| iAs | data gap | — | — | — | — |
| tAs | n=2 | 0 | 0 | low | 1 |
| tHg | n=2 | 0 | 0 | low | 1 |
| Ni | n=2 | 0 | 0 | low | 1 |
| Al | data gap | — | — | — | — |
| Cr | n=2 | 0 | 0 | low | 1 |
| Sn | data gap | — | — | — | — |
| U | n=2 | 0 | 0 | low | — |
FDA TDS FY2018-FY2020 Evidence
The normalized row-level data for this TDS food is stored in data/evidence/fda_tds_fy2018_2020_element_results_samples.csv, with per-food/per-analyte summaries in data/evidence/fda_tds_fy2018_2020_summary_by_food_analyte.csv. Concentrations are retained as FDA reported them, with the reporting-limit column preserved separately; reported zeroes are not rewritten as <LOD unless a source explicitly says to do so. fda2022-tds-elements-fy2018-fy2020
Routing
This node is linked from the ingredient index and the FDA TDS source routing table.
Contamination Profile State
The machine-readable contamination profile is in_progress for analytes measured in the TDS file and pending for profile metals not measured by this source. Ingredient-level values belong here once cross-source synthesis is reviewed; product-category values belong on the relevant product page.
FDA TDS FY2018-FY2020 Occurrence Values
FDA Total Diet Study FY2018-FY2020 reports prepared/composite-food concentration distributions for this ingredient as TDS food “Cream substitute, non-dairy, liquid” (fda2022-tds-elements-fy2018-fy2020). Values are in ppb-equivalent on the basis FDA reported. The full sample-level data are stored in data/evidence/fda_tds_fy2018_2020_element_results_samples.csv; per-analyte distributions in data/evidence/fda_tds_fy2018_2020_summary_by_food_analyte.csv. These distributions count as one source under persistent-wiki-ingest-rule synthesis discipline; numerical values stay in body scratch until a second independent source is integrated.
| Metal | n | min | p10 | p50 | p90 | p95 | max | Schema |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | in profile |
| Cr | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | in profile |
| Ni | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | in profile |
| Pb | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | in profile |
| U | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | in profile |
| tAs | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | in profile |
| tHg | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | in profile |
Ranges by source, region, and variety
Non-dairy creamer does not exhibit meaningful geographic variation in metal content in the way that primary agricultural commodities do, because the constituent ingredients (refined oils, glucose syrups, sodium caseinate) are themselves processed to a degree that erases most geographic soil-related variation before they enter the creamer formulation. Brand-to-brand variation is more likely to arise from differences in oil type (palm oil versus soybean oil versus coconut oil), which each carry slightly different impurity profiles from their respective refining processes. Powdered versus liquid creamer formats do not differ substantially in metal profile on a water-corrected basis; the powder is effectively a dried version of the liquid. The FDA TDS FY2018-FY2020 dataset fda2022-tds-elements-fy2018-fy2020 covers liquid non-dairy creamer (TDS Food 168, n=3) with all analytes reported at or below detection limits, consistent with the expectation that this is a low-risk matrix.
Processing effects
The multi-step refining processes applied to the vegetable oil components of non-dairy creamer (including high-temperature deodorization and bleaching with activated clay) are the principal processing steps that reduce metal content relative to crude agricultural inputs. These steps remove phospholipid-associated metals and adsorb trace elements onto clay media before filtration. Starch hydrolysis to glucose syrup further removes metals bound to starch granule surfaces. Subsequent blending, emulsification, and pasteurization or spray-drying of the final product do not introduce meaningful metal contamination provided that processing equipment is maintained and not a source of metal migration. The processing chain as a whole is an effective metal-reduction pathway for this product category.
Ingredient-derivative risk
Non-dairy creamer is itself a formulated product rather than an agricultural ingredient; its derivatives in the food supply are downstream consumer uses (in coffee, tea, and recipes) rather than further processing into distinct commodity forms. There is no meaningful derivative risk hierarchy for this product in the heavy metals context given the uniformly low metal concentrations observed in TDS monitoring data fda2022-tds-elements-fy2018-fy2020.
Mitigation options
Sourcing levers
No quantified data on this lever in the current corpus; section will be expanded when relevant evidence is ingested.
Agronomic levers
Not applicable; non-dairy creamer is a formulated product, not a directly harvested commodity.
Processing levers
Maintaining refining process quality controls for the vegetable oil and glucose syrup components (particularly activated-clay bleaching efficiency and deodorization temperature profiles) is the primary processing lever for ensuring continued low metal content in the finished product.
Formulation levers
No quantified data on this lever in the current corpus; section will be expanded when relevant evidence is ingested.
Testing and QC levers
Given the uniformly below-detection-limit values observed in TDS monitoring data, routine lot-level metal testing is of low priority for this ingredient in most application contexts. For infant or young-child product applications, supplier declaration and periodic ICP-MS verification provide an appropriate assurance level.
Packaging and storage levers
No quantified data on this lever in the current corpus; section will be expanded when relevant evidence is ingested.
Regulatory limits that apply
No specific maximum level for Pb, Cd, or other metals applies exclusively to non-dairy creamer under EU Regulation (EU) 2023/915 eu2023-contaminants-maximum-levels or under Codex CXS 193-1995. General food safety provisions and horizontal contaminant regulations apply; the product would fall within the broader dairy-substitute or fat-based food categories for regulatory classification purposes. No US federal maximum level specifically addresses non-dairy creamer for metal contaminants outside the general HACCP and adulteration framework.
Sources
Auto-generated from source-page frontmatter. The “Used on this page for” column is populated by the orchestrator’s POPULATE-SOURCE-LEGEND action; pending entries appear as *[awaiting synthesis]*.
| # | Citation | Year | Type | Used on this page for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FDA 2022. FY2018-FY2020 TDS Elements Analytical Results, FDA Total Diet Study | 2022 | Government dataset | FDA TDS FY2018–FY2020 Cd, Cr, Ni, Pb, U, tAs, tHg occurrence distributions for Cream substitute, non-dairy, liquid (n=3); all analytes reported as zero (BDL) |
Page history
The five most recent substantive edits to this page. The full version history lives in git; when DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.
| Commit | Date | Description |
|---|---|---|
| b0f3d38 | 2026-06-12 | batch | corpus rescreen b04 old terminal skips |