Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

A comparison of arsenic exposure in young

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by7 pages
Metals measured4
Evidence tierB
Year2017

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • arsenic (As) levels greater than the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (10 μg/L) were identified in home water samples.
  • Results: Arsenic was detectable in all children tested. Blood levels ranged from 0.09–2.61 μg/dL; approximately 31% of
  • children tested at Time I (79/252) had blood As values above the current acceptable limit (1.2 μg/dL). Approximately 8% of
  • household water samples (6/76) had As levels higher than 10 μg/L. Community did not predict child blood As levels;
  • Background absorb 40% to 90% more ingested heavy metals (11, 12).
  • (EPA) maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10 μg/L mately three weeks prior to child testing; child assent
  • ground water samples reported that 25.8% of southwest communities had not been tested previously for heavy
  • current maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10 μg/L, attempted, and as many children as possible were recruited
  • with values ranging from 10 to 24 μg/L; an additional from each community.
  • 16.9% had levels ≥25 μg/L. Specific regional analysis of
  • expected to have As levels exceeding 10 μg/L (34). All children in this study lived and attended elementary
  • tic wells and without access to a municipal water predominantly Hispanic or Latino descent (96.1%), and
  • tested had As levels exceeding 10 μg/L. Children (36). All families in this community depended on water
  • on well-water sources had higher blood As levels as of predominantly Hispanic or Latino descent (98.9%),
  • followed up with parents throughout the study via remaining 19% of children who did not complete Time
  • April to May (Community 1, n = 44; Community 2, n = 74), dinners held at the elementary schools that school
  • n = 58; Community 2, n = 76) and also re-test all children Blood sample collection and analysis
  • months after Time I testing. As indicted in Table 1, 81% scheduled. Household water samples were collected
  • Table 1 Demographic characteristics of participants by community at Time I and Time II
  • Females % 42.2% 56.0% 50.4% 37.9% 53.8% 47.1%
  • Mother’s Ethnicity n (%) 72/102 (71%) 115/150 (77%) 187/252 (74%) 59/87 (68%) 91/117 (78%) 150/204 (74%)
  • Hispanic/Mexican-American 98.6% 98.3% 98.4% 98.3% 100.0% 99.3%
  • Father’s Ethnicity n (%) 70/102 (69%) 109/150 (73%) 179/252 (71%) 57/87 (66%) 88/117 (75%) 146/204 (72%)
  • Hispanic/ Mexican-American 100.0% 93.6% 96.1% 100% 94.3% 95.9%
  • with 70% alcohol and lint-free wipes, and completing a SAS Version 9.3. (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina)
  • 2% nitric acid (prepared containers provided by the level changed significantly from Time I to Time II
  • Type III sum of squares were interpreted for all models. mean family size was 5.17 (±1.42). For households with
  • particularly for larger samples sizes, e.g. N > 50. None- Table 2 summarizes child anthropometric measurements
  • than the upper quartile were identified as outliers and Consistent with national averages, approximately 33%
  • each report of general linear model results including all level for “elevated”) (42). As shown in Table 2, at Time I,
  • and Time II are provided in Tables 2 and 6. approached the exposure limit while mean Cd and Pb
  • Results (Time I As geometric mean = 0.85). As Table 3 and Fig. 1
  • The demographic characteristics of the analyzed sample illustrate, As levels ranged from 0.09 to 2.61 μg/dL;
  • of 252 children are shown in Table 1. approximately 31% of children (79/252) had blood As
  • Demographic and health and personal history data values above the defined limit. An additional 12% of
  • included approximately equal numbers of males and fe- Table 3 Frequencies of child blood As levels at Time I testing
  • males with a mean Time I age of 8.01 (±1.92). Approxi- by community (N = 252)
  • mately 98% of parents self-identified as Hispanic, Latino, Community 1 Community 2
  • Table 2 Anthropometrics and heavy metal blood levels of % %
  • Normal (5th–85th %ile) 65.7% 62.4% 62.2% 1.200–1.399a 10 9.8 79 77.5 28 18.7 132 88.0
  • Fig. 1 Frequency of child As blood levels at Time I by community (N = 252)
  • (Table 4), the sum of squares was not significant for

Methods (brief)

  • arsenic (As) levels greater than the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (10 μg/L) were identified in home water samples.
  • Home water samples were collected according to U.S. Environmental Protection agency recommended procedures.
  • Child heavy metal blood levels and home water sample heavy metal levels were analyzed using inductively coupled
  • plasma mass spectrometry. General linear regression analysis was used to test the influence of community on child As
  • household water samples (6/76) had As levels higher than 10 μg/L. Community did not predict child blood As levels;
  • ground water samples reported that 25.8% of southwest communities had not been tested previously for heavy
  • regions tested had As concentration levels above the metal exposure, effect and sample size estimations were not
  • the Rio Grande aquifer samples showed that 19.2% were Study population
  • supply (35). Approximately half of water samples including 316 children between the ages of 5 and 14
  • levels, for a subsample of children in each commu- Recruitment and sample
  • nity, home water samples were also tested and used Parents and children were recruited from the elementary
  • home water samples were also tested. We predicted and during Parent-Teacher Conference nights. Children
  • above). A total of 102 children completed Time I testing sample of children; only one child had been previously
  • 2 children declined the finger-stick blood collection pletion, child testing, and water sample collection). All
  • n = 58; Community 2, n = 76) and also re-test all children Blood sample collection and analysis
  • Funding allowed household water sample testing im- the sample finger (usually ring-finger of the left hand)
  • mediately after Time I child testing for a subsample of with an alcohol swipe before lancing. One 50 μl whole
  • 118 recruited children in Communities 1 and 2 from 84 blood finger stick sample was collected from each child

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised