Table 6 in the text layer lost decimal points, so those tokens are not reconstructed. Only discussion numerals that name a hard-candy code are copied. Toffee and chocolate codes are not hard candy. Wrappers are not the candy. Recoveries are printed, including 101.03% for lead. A cadmium recovery of 101.76% in one table conflicts with another printed cadmium recovery. No numeric limit of detection is printed for BDL.
Key numbers
Hard-candy discussion figures, μg/g: lead in code S10 is 2.40. Nickel is 13.24 (S1), 1.48 (S2), 3.1 (S3), 1.43 (S6), 14.78 (S10), 1.28 (S11), 1.19 (S16), 2.89 (S18), 1.19 (S19), and 1.25 (S23). Lead is BDL for hard-candy codes S32, S33, S34, and S38. Chromium is BDL for the listed hard-candy codes in that chromium sentence. BDL is not a concentration. Candy-wide ranges that include toffee are not used. Chromium is not labeled hexavalent.
Methods (brief)
Candies were digested and measured by atomic spectrometry. Codes come from the sample table. C (h) marks hard candy.
Evidence fitness
The discussion numerals support a hard-candy lead and nickel note. BDL cells are not numbers. Table 6 is not reconstructed.
Limitations
Decimal points in Table 6 are not recoverable. Cadmium has no usable hard-candy mean in the discussion numerals used here.
Related evidence
Update history
No substantive edit history is available in this build. The full commit record is available in git.