Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Development of a reference material for mercury in fish: certified

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by7 pages
Metals measured2
Evidence tierB
Year2025

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • uncertainty of 1.8%, while MeHg was 2.9%. Other uncertainty components included long-term stability (2.5%), homogeneity
  • (1.8%), and short-term stability under transport conditions (0.02%). The CRM was certified with a total Hg mass fraction
  • of 3.94 mg/kg (relative expanded uncertainty 7.1%, k = 2) and an informative MeHg mass fraction of 3.79 mg/kg (relative
  • expanded uncertainty 8.3%, k = 2). This CRM is a valuable tool for assessing mercury in similar matrices, supporting com-
  • 30 # 45‑03, 111321 Bogotá, Colombia the atmosphere increased by 20%, with South America, sub-
  • (FAAST), Department of Chemical Engineering tors. In South America, approximately 80% of total mercury
  • mercury concentrations, ranging from 0.04 to 0.44 mg/kg, packaged in amber glass bottles containing 15 g of mate-
  • ments in the Latin American context. content nearing 20 mg/kg; hence, the normalized produc-
  • separation was achieved using a 5% diphenyl/95% dimethyl
  • trated, doubly subdistilled nitric acid and 2 mL of 30% diameter, and 0.25 µm film thickness). The temperature pro-
  • stabilize mercury in the solution, 0.2 mL of a 100 µg/kg gold of 10 °C/min until reaching 240 °C, where it was held for
  • the extracts were diluted to a final weight of 20 g with deion- in 25% KOH) in a thermostatic bath at 80 °C for 8 h. The
  • ized water (0.055 µS/cm, Elga, Purelab Flex, UK), and the extracted MeHg was then derivatized using 2% sodium
  • Isotope monitoring included 74Ge, 199Hg, 200Hg, 201Hg, and urements, a derivatized MeHgCl solution at 1000 mg/kg was
  • ­MSresidual indicates the mean square of residuals, and ­n0 bottles were analyzed under intermediate precision condi-
  • tively low at 4%. Filleting and deboning incurred the highest Homogeneity
  • to significant material loss. Moisture content was 4%, with Before estimating the homogeneity uncertainty for the
  • 10%. This increased yield was attributed to a more efficient (ANOVA) in accordance with ISO Guide 33,405, ensuring
  • reduced to 3.2%, indicating improved process efficiency. determined in the study for different combinations of mer-
  • 3.4%, indicative of a stable and durable material (14, 24). isotopes. This conclusion was supported by smaller mean
  • The 118–230 μm fraction provided the best balance between the pilot CRM was 3.1%.
  • for this batch was 1.8%, lower than that of the pilot pro-
  • kg and an uncertainty of 3.80%, its significantly lower con-
  • when comparing the normalized material with ERM-CE 60 °C and 80% relative humidity in the pilot material are
  • 3.90%) (13), a similar total mercury concentration is evident; day zero of the study.
  • uncertainty attributable to the short-term stability of the batch over 730 days, during which total mercury measure-
  • the pilot material as 0.02% at 30 days under temperature results obtained in the determination of mercury at different
  • 0.02%, demonstrating that the preparation process could be tion because it is the most used model. The uncertainty due
  • reliably reproduced across different batches and the stability to long-term stability was 2.5%.
  • comparable to that of the standardized material, a stability estimated at 0.14%, while the standard relative uncertainty
  • study was conducted using a classic design over 855 days. of the method was 2.6%. The mathematical model used and
  • that no instabilities occurred in the material over the entire measurement yielded 4.00 ± 0.2 mg/kg, and the second day
  • period. was 3.99 ± 0.07 mg/kg. The mean and combined uncertainty
  • were 4.00 ± 0.11 mg/kg (2.63% as relative uncertainty)
  • The pilot CRM was to assess the preparation conditions and yielding a non-statistically significant of 1.0%.
  • was not conducted for this batch; total Hg concentration ing calibration, showed stable measurements over 3 days.
  • was estimated using CV-AAS method obtained a value of The mean value was 3.87 ± 0.079 mg/kg (2.0% as relative
  • 20.88 mg/kg and an RSD of 1.72% with n = 5. uncertainty). When comparing the two methods, CV-AAS
  • Table 1 Combination of methods for assigning total Hg value process presented in Table 1.
  • CRM DORM-4 served as a control. The mean measurement
  • value for MeHg in the fish material was 3.79 ± 0.11 mg/kg
  • value was 3.82 ± 0.11 mg/kg, and on the second day, it was

Methods (brief)

  • fasciatum) from the Colombian Amazon. The process involved raw material selection, sample preparation, homogeneity, and
  • stability, resulting in the CRM INM-039–1. Total Hg was measured using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry
  • (ICP-MS) and cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry (CV-AAS), while MeHg was analyzed by gas chromatography-
  • mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Calibration methods varied: ICP-MS used gravimetric standard addition, CV-AAS employed
  • (FAAST), Department of Chemical Engineering tors. In South America, approximately 80% of total mercury
  • Instituto Nacional de Metrología de Colombia, Av Carrera 50 ces requires sophisticated and tailored sample preparation
  • urement steps (2, 6). Certified reference materials (CRMs) Collection of samples and preparation
  • determined on a dry basis. In each case, a 0.5 g portion 100 °C and a 500 µL sample loop.
  • achieved. This sample portion was independent of the one Methyl mercury determination
  • used for measurement The sample portion in all experiments
  • the produced fish material. formed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
  • Each subsample (0.5 g) was treated with 3 mL of concen- polysiloxane column (Elite 5, 30 m length, 250 µm inner
  • ion solution (SMU, Slovakia) was added (21). The samples an additional 3 min. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a
  • to 20 °C. After digestion, the samples were allowed to cool The sample preparation for MeHg determination involved
  • plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and cold vapor atomic ized product with a 9:1 mixture of toluene and isooctane.
  • absorption spectrometry (CV-AAS). This method was adapted from the procedure described by
  • ICP‑MS analysis standard correction, was applied using an isotope-enriched
  • The ICP-MS (NexION300D, Perkin Elmer, MA, USA) For quality control, the certified reference materials

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised