Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Mercury contamination and human exposure

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by7 pages
Metals measured3
Evidence tierB
Year2026

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • ment in the form of metallic or elemental Hg (­Hg0), matã (Prochilodus brevis), the Piau (Leporinus sp.),
  • eral deposits and/or volcanic activities. However, responded with 86,000 tones, approximately 17% of
  • ties have developed recommendations that establish fisheries in northeastern Brazil (Table 1). For three
  • Table 1 Species, common name, total Hg concentrations, size and the percentage of methyl-Hg (mean, standard deviation and size
  • Species Common name Total Hg (ng ­g−1 w.w.) LT (cm) n Methyl-Hg (%) n
  • Fish samples were obtained from major reser- by immersion for 24 h in a 10% Hg-free HCl solu-
  • ­NaBH4 (Lacerda et al., 2014; Moura & Lacerda, μL of each sample, and 50 μL of 1% sodium tetra-
  • 2018, 2022). The limit of detection (LOD) was cal- ethyl borate. Ethylated extracts were taken to a final
  • average recoveries varying from 88 to 101%. The Rand automated methyl-Hg system. Certified refer-
  • limit of quantification (LOQ) of the procedure was ence material (Tuna Fish-BCR-463) analyzed using
  • the LOD multiplied by 10 (USEPA, 2000) and was the same procedure yielded an average recovery of
  • 1.0 ng.g−1. Concentration values obtained were not 82%. The average LOD was 0.02 ng.g−1 and LOQ
  • Exposure risk estimates considered total Hg concen- taminants, where a THQ < 1 means no potential risk
  • from 54.8% in P. squamosissimus (Hake) from the arid vegetation surrounding the Castanhão Reservoir
  • Castanhão Reservoir to 100% in S. rhombeus (Pira- create completely different environmental conditions
  • rhombeus feeds mainly on fish (> 80%), particu- concentration favoring predation, as hypothesized for
  • nile S. rhombeus are specialized on preying fish fins, the reservoir. The results (Table 1) showed that the
  • (100%, both in frequency and relative weight of food for the Hg and methyl-Hg contents, size-Hg relation-
  • tribute with 33.3% and 2.1% frequency, respectively, tive correlation with, whereas in the fluvial habitat
  • although these two items sum up only 2.7% in weight Hg concentrations increase with size (Fig. 2). Unfor-
  • from northeastern Brazil are in the same range of centrations were well over it (1,700 ng.g−1 w.w.)
  • presented significantly lower Hg concentrations than greater than 30 meals per month (Table 3). It is worth
  • wild fish from areas not affected by the fish farms, sumer group (Table 4) and was lower for children
  • Exposure estimates showed no significant risk of THQ < 1 means no potential risk of adverse effects
  • (Table 2). This result highlights the very low levels ering the high consumption (in a subsistence basis),
  • than the local per capita fish consumption ­(FCNE), the sive exposure to Hg (Tables 3 and 5). These results
  • subsistence consumption rate (­FCsubs), which means Nogueira et al. (2025), which showed that exposure
  • Prochilodus rubrotaeniatus 4.86 1.19 4.14 4.73 5.65 1.38 4.82 5.50 2.82 6.89 2.40 2.74
  • Prochilodus rubrotaeniatus Rio Cocó 0.50 0.21 0.59 0.52 102 84 120 105
  • Table 4 Safe fish screening Consumer FCNE = 0.0245 FCWHO = 0.0285 FCSUBS = 0.142
  • Prochilodus rubrotaeniatus 0.05 0.12 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.14 0.05 0.06 0.28 0.69 0.24 0.27

Methods (brief)

  • niloticus). Overall, concentrations were very low and those of the same species but sampled in reservoirs.
  • ment in the form of metallic or elemental Hg (­Hg0), matã (Prochilodus brevis), the Piau (Leporinus sp.),
  • Prochilodus argenteus (Fl) Curimata 6.2 ± 1.5 (3.2–8.4) 20.2 ± 4.5 (19.0–31.0) 9 94.5 (81.7–100) 5
  • (Piranha), individuals were sampled from reservoirs et al. (2023) that describes the continental aquatic
  • and rivers, while for Oreochromis niloticus (tilapia), fauna of the state of Ceará. Samples were collected
  • individuals were sampled from fish farms and open directly in rivers and reservoirs using traditional
  • reservoirs. Total Hg concentrations were quantified in fishery techniques. When available, samples were
  • cies. For two species (e.g. H. malabaricus (Traíra) samples were packaged and preserved in Styrofoam
  • and Leporinus friderici (Piau)), the sample size was with ice until they arrived at the laboratory for
  • with caution. Fish Hg concentrations are reported in treatment and digestion of the samples were previ-
  • Fish samples were obtained from major reser- by immersion for 24 h in a 10% Hg-free HCl solu-
  • variations. All sampling sites occur in the larger philized sample were weighed directly in metal-free
  • Species were acquired directly from fishermen and 200 °C for 30 min, after digestion, 1 mL of hydro-
  • the sampled watershed
  • vapor atomic absorption spectrophotometry (CV- For sample ethylation it was added to each tube
  • AAS, NIPON® NIC RA-3), after Hg reduction with 300 μL of a 2 mol.L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5), 30
  • ­NaBH4 (Lacerda et al., 2014; Moura & Lacerda, μL of each sample, and 50 μL of 1% sodium tetra-
  • 2018, 2022). The limit of detection (LOD) was cal- ethyl borate. Ethylated extracts were taken to a final

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised