Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

This study analysed urinary mercury (U-Hg) concentrations in 1412 Slovenian children across four human

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by6 pages
Metals measured4
Evidence tierB
Year2026

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • biomonitoring campaigns conducted between 2007 and 2024. Median U-Hg levels declined from 0.76 ng mL−1
  • SLO-HBM-II cohort, paralleling a decrease in the prevalence (from 65 to 3%) and the average number of dental
  • However, its composition, of approximately 50% Hg⁰, Thus, U-Hg reflects not only inorganic and elemental Hg
  • ally, of which 70–100 tons (20–30%) enter the waste used in about 30% of restorations in Slovenia, primarily
  • major determinants, and to illustrate how such informa- each study are summarised in Table 1, additional details
  • tion can support future assessments of amalgam phase- in the Supplementary Material Table S1.
  • Table 1 Overview of Slovenian child cohorts included in the present analysis. More detailed information is available in the
  • Study area(s) Urban (n = 1), rural (n = 1), Urban (n = 1), rural (n = 1) Urban (n = 1) Urban (n = 7), rural (n = 1), (potentially)
  • Hg-contaminated (n = 1) Hg-contaminated (n = 3)
  • numbers listed in Table S1). As these were observational consistently fell within assigned acceptance ranges.
  • collected into nitric-acid solution pre-cleaned vessels (or by LOD/2. Differences between cohorts were evalu-
  • evolved over the 17 years (Table 1). In the initial cohorts unmeasured local context shared by children residing in
  • (LODs) were 0.10 ng mL−1 and 0.05 ng mL−1, respectively. The outcome variable was natural log-transformed
  • – Model 1 (base model): sampling year as fixed effect cohorts (Kruskal–Wallis, p < 0.001; Table S3). The highest
  • demographic and contextual covariates (age, sex, (Table 2; Table S4). When using creatinine-adjusted con-
  • consumption). shifted (Table S4). These discrepancies likely reflect vari-
  • mula: % reduction = (ꞵModel1—ꞵModel3)/ꞵModel1 × 100. (Fig. 1 and Figure S2; Table S5). Across the pooled data-
  • whether the temporal trend differed by fish intake. time, from 65% in PHIME, 37% in DEMOCOPHES, 12%
  • – Model 5: Model 4 with the addition of year × binary in CROME, to only 3% in SLO-HBM-II. Moreover, even
  • difference between amalgam carriers and non- decreased across successive cohorts (Table 3; Fig. 1; Fig-
  • recent cohorts from 19.7% in PHIME, 48.9% in CROME,
  • Missing data and sensitivity analysis to 67.5% in SLO-HBM-II. Similar trends were observed
  • The overall data missingness was low: 94.1% of chil- in Idrija and Ljubljana over the years (Fig. 1; Figure S2;
  • (Table S2). As a sensitivity check, the same mixed-effects elling approach with random intercepts for town was
  • the models are presented in Tables 4 and 5. In the base
  • 1.46 was observed, with a geometric mean ratio (GMR) of
  • ing an average annual decline of approximately 5.5%.
  • The LODs for the PHIME, DEMOCOPHES, CROME, and SLO-HBM-II were: 0.1 ng mL−1, 0.05 ng mL−1, 0.06 ng mL−1, and 0.04 ng mL−1, respectively
  • 12.4 effect, increasing the GMR to 0.977 (95% CI: 0.961,
  • GM = geometric mean; Min = minimum; p25 = 25th percentile; p50 = 50th percentile (median); p75 = 75th percentile; Max = maximum
  • Number of individuals with available urinary Hg concentration data. Missing data in µg g−1 creatinine: in 2007 (n = 1); in 2016 (n = 1)
  • Table 2 Summary of U-Hg concentrations (in ng mL−1 and in µg g−1 creatinine) by study cohort and year
  • < LOD high vs. low, all p < 0.001), indicating that, after adjust-
  • 0.22 < LOD of dietary sources to U-Hg becomes more prominent.
  • (ng mL.−1; median and interquartile range, left y-axis) and, on the right y-axis, the percentage of participants with at least one dental amalgam and the
  • tion (Supplementary Material, Tables S6 − 7), indicating Slovenian children were low and comparable to those
  • status (yes/no) was negative and borderline significant lations (6). The highest median U-Hg concentration was
  • Table 3 Summary of basic participant characteristics by study cohort and year
  • x ̄ = arithmetic mean; SD = standard deviation; BMI = body mass index; Amalgam Yes = indicator that child has dental amalgam filling(s); fish consumption: low = < 1
  • Missing data on amalgam presence/number: in 2007 (n = 28)
  • Table 4 Multilevel modelling of the temporal trend in urinary Hg concentrations (2007–2024). Year effect reduction (%) represents the
  • Table 5 Multilevel mixed-effects models assessing effect modification of the temporal trend in urinary Hg (2007–2024). Models

Methods (brief)

  • among children and shifts in the relative importance of sample. Most towns were sampled only once (within a
  • established with school headmasters, followed by infor-
  • Sample Spot morning urine Spot morning urine Spot random urine Spot morning urine
  • Sample preparation Acid digestion (hot plate) Acid digestion (hot plate) Acid digestion (microwave) Acid digestion (microwave)
  • THg determination CVAAS CVAAS ICP-MS ICP-MS
  • LOD (ng mL−1) 0.10 0.05 0.06 0.04
  • % samples < LOD 3.0 0.0 9.7 4.5
  • Refers to the total number of recruited children. For SLO-HBM-II, a subsample consisting of children aged 6–9
  • graphic data were collected consistently, whereas fish that required inclusion of at least one reference material
  • assumed. Other key variables, including the number between the older CVAAS method and the newer ICP-
  • of dental amalgam fillings, were collected comparably MS method. These procedures, along with continuous
  • sample at their local primary school visit. Samples were Values below the limit of detection (LOD) were replaced
  • collected into nitric-acid solution pre-cleaned vessels (or by LOD/2. Differences between cohorts were evalu-
  • spot sample (not first-morning) at their appointed visit between the number of dental amalgam fillings and U-Hg
  • to the Paediatric Clinic. All samples were transported to levels were investigated using Spearman’s correlation (ρ).
  • cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry (CVAAS) effect to estimate the overall temporal trend across the
  • after acid digestion on a hot plate. The limits of detection entire dataset.
  • (LODs) were 0.10 ng mL−1 and 0.05 ng mL−1, respectively. The outcome variable was natural log-transformed

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised