Overview
This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.
Key numbers
The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:
- Methods: the study targeted n=260 dentists in dental students and interns in Kenya showed a high
- DAPD (61.3%), and what is crucial for countries in
- MCM as of 2022. The majority (71.3%) used
- the most (68%) available alternative restorative.
- registered by the Kenya Medical and Dental results section (Table 1). The checklist consisted of
- restorative criteria for each of the levels of early participated. Almost half (43.4%) of the participants
- and input was used to improve the tool. The counties. There were more males (59.8%), while
- outcome variables were the level of knowledge on the mean age of the dentists was 37.6 (SD 10.26),
- MCM and DAPD, skill in selection of restorative, and and a minority (20.6%) were over 50 years. Almost
- the level of availability of dental amalgam all the dentists (95.3%) practiced restorative
- alternative restoratives. A link to the questionnaire dentistry, with 68.7% having obtained their basic
- was sent to participants in the study WhatsApp wall degree after the year 2000 (Table 2).
- answer all questions; this was in an attempt to evaluated. A sizeable number (84%) indicated
- Limesurvey to Statistical Package for the Social reason behind DAPD (61.3%), and what is crucial for
- Sciences version 25, IBM Chicago, Illinois which was countries in its implementation (68%). However,
- used for analysis. Descriptive statistics, namely only 39.1% were knowledgeable on the status of
- frequencies, percentages, and standard deviation, Kenya with regard to the MCM as of 2022 (Table 1).
- dental amalgam and resin-modified glass ionomer dental surveys, 7% - 100%, mean of 70.8% (20).
- cements, 36.7% and 25.8% respectively. A minority Comparatively, it is also higher than the rate
- of the dentists, 14.1% would select ceramic inlays attained in the East Africa DAPD project I in 2013,
- “often” and “always”. On the other hand, a sizeable where 8.5% of 569 dentists responded (21). The
- select alkasite restorative material, 64.1% and gold depicts a tremendous increase. In this study, there
- inlays, 52.0%. Notably, there was a minority who were more males than females, which correlates
- never selected dental amalgam, 23.4% (Table 3). with the sex distribution of dentists in the country,
- third of dentine was composite resin, 62.5% and distribution exists (22). Nonetheless, the results
- 61.1% respectively, followed by an equal number, cannot be generalized to the nation´s 47 counties.
- 10.2% that would use conventional glass ionomer
- contrast, only a minority of the dentists, 10.2% context in which access to postgraduate training
- extending to EDJ, and 10.6% for caries extending to structure of government. Additionally, the finding
- restoratives were at the disposal to more than 50% decision-making approaches of practitioners within
- restorative materials (2.3%) and gold alloys 5.1% the MCM and DAPD. These results differ from
- that of studies among dentists: 2.7% of 14,890 in convention, and or apathy of the matter as
- Australia, 5.2% of 45,557 in the USA, and 45% of reported among Australian dentists in 2014 (26). It
- 1686 in Jordan (2,18,19). It falls between the range is also probable that the country´s participation in
- 2016, where usage of DA was reported as at 50% rather restore rather than undergo inevitable
- and 49% respectively (13,27). Additionally, low future root canal treatment interventions. It
- was reported to range from 25.2% in class I to educate and motivate the population to have a
- 18.5% in class II among dentists in Kenya (13). In significant caries reduction and smaller cavities in
- down project of 2013 reported equitable high the holy grail of dentistry in Kenya and globally.
- Table 1: frequency distribution of Kenyan dentists Braspenning JCC, van der Sanden WJM,
- (n = 256) based on their knowledge of the Huysmans MCDNJM et al. Minimally Invasive
- phase-down among participants (n = 256) as of dentistry in the undergraduate curriculum. J
Methods (brief)
- November 2022. Data was collected online using an level of knowledge on the MCM and competency in
- large direct DAAR restorations of the most Study size: sample size was calculated using the
- development of national DAPD guidelines and Where n is the minimum sample size, N is the study
- Substituting all a sample size of 260 was targeted.
- Data collection: data were collected using an
- proximal early carious lesions to which the of the study. The data collected were anonymous,
- restorative material for early carious lesions targeted sample size of 260, 256 filled the
- collected and analyzed the data. Bernina Kyale
Implications
This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.
Wiki pages this source may touch
Verification notes
- Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing
wiki/sources/pages before creation. - Full-PDF read:
pdftotext -layoutwas run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written. - Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
- Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
- HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.
Update history
The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.