Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Ecological Risk and Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals in Soil–Vegetable

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the methylmercury infant-formula research pull.

Page snapshot
Cited by8 pages
Metals measured5
Evidence tierB
Year2025

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the methylmercury infant-formula research pull. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • Journal of Agriculture Sustainability and Environment ISSN: 2997-271X
  • https://doi.org/10.56556/jase.v4i2.1385
  • Abubakar Mohd Habu1*, Ali Sanusi Hassan1, Adeniyi Olarewaju Adeleye2, Michael Edet Nkereuwem3,
  • concentrations reaching 23.0 mg/kg in carrot shoots and Fe at 1046.5 mg/kg in onion leaves, whereas Cu and Zn
  • remained within safe limits. The soils were slightly alkaline with pH 7.76 and a sandy-loam texture which,
  • exceeding 1 corroborated the presence of cumulative pollution at several sites. Overall, the results underscore
  • sustaining agricultural production in many developing countries (Singh 2021; Nowwar et al., 2023). In arid and
  • nutrient-rich composition (Qadir et al., 2022; Chen et al., 2023). Wastewater is known to contain essential plant
  • Global Scientific Research 21
  • et al., 2021; Woldetsadik et al., 2023). Despite these agronomic benefits, wastewater often contains substances
  • soils and pose long-term ecological and health risks (Abbas et al., 2023). Metals such as lead (Pb), cadmium
  • sources (Abdullahi et al., 2025; Ugya et al., 2019). These metals are non-biodegradable and can persist in the
  • (Bellanthudawa et al., 2023; Zhou et al., 2020).
  • pH, soil texture, organic matter content, redox potential, and irrigation practices (Wu et al., 2022). In many urban
  • facilitates their uptake by plants (Golia, 2023; Lucija et al., 2025). Consequently, high concentrations of metals
  • damage, neurological disorders, and cancer (Boahen et al., 2024; Mawari et al., 2022). In Africa, wastewater
  • commercial, and industrial wastewaters are used for year-round vegetable production (Tayo, 2021). In Kano
  • for irrigation (Abdulsalam et., 2023). In such regions, monitoring programs are often absent or poorly managed,
  • (Bellanthudawa et al., 2023; Oladipo et al., 2022). Heavy metal pollution not only threatens human health but
  • nitrogen fixation and nutrient cycling (Rashid et al., 2023). These ecological disruptions impair soil fertility,
  • contaminated with industrial effluents (Abdullahi et al., 2025; Shawai et al., 2019). Crops such as lettuce,
  • et al., 2025; Shawai et al., 2019). Previous studies have reported elevated levels of lead and cadmium in
  • ecological risks remain scarce (Zhang et al., 2023). The long-term accumulation of heavy metals in soil can
  • risks—undermining efforts to promote sustainable urban agriculture (Bellanthudawa et al., 2023; Zhou et al.,
  • severity of contamination relative to background levels (Hakanson, 1980; Müller, 1969; Tomlinson et al., 1980).
  • Global Scientific Research 22
  • The research was conducted in Tamburawa, located approximately 25 km southeast of Kano metropolis, Nigeria
  • (Figure 1). The area lies within the Sudan savanna ecological zone, characterized by distinct wet and dry seasons.
  • standard protocols for trace metal studies in crops (Anirban et al., 2023; Ene et al., 2024). At each sampling plot,
  • randomly selected healthy plants, pooled to form one replicate (n = 3 per species). This sampling design ensured
  • (Sultana et al., 2022).
  • 2023). The cleaned plant materials were then cut into small pieces, air-dried under shade for 5–7 days, and stored
  • Global Scientific Research 23
  • Figure 1. Study Area; Tamburawa, Kumbotso Local Government Area, Kano State, Nigeria
  • approximately 200 g of root-adhered soil was collected from a 0–20 cm depth at three points per plant, pooled,
  • air-dried, and sieved through a 2 mm mesh (Asamoah et al., 2025; Carrera et al, 2025). Thus, each vegetable
  • species had three rhizosphere composite replicates (n = 3).
  • Global Scientific Research 24
  • disaggregate clods, and sieved through a 2 mm mesh to remove stones and coarse debris (Asamoah et al.,2025;
  • Carrera et al, 2025). The processed samples were stored in clean polyethylene zip-lock bags and kept in a
  • Heavy metals in soil and plant samples were extracted using the wet digestion method following APHA (2012)
  • and USEPA (1996) protocols. Approximately 1.0 g of the sieved sample was weighed into a digestion flask,

Methods (brief)

  • rhizosphere soil and edible parts of vegetables (cabbage, carrot, lettuce, onion, and spinach) multiple samples of
  • which were analyzed using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (AAS). Key physicochemical soil parameters
  • three composite replicate samples were collected per vegetable species. Each composite comprised five
  • Immediately after collection, samples were thoroughly washed with tap water to remove visible soil and dust
  • in labeled paper envelopes pending laboratory digestion and heavy metal analysis.
  • Rhizosphere soil samples were collected simultaneously with the vegetable samples. The rhizosphere was
  • approximately 200 g of root-adhered soil was collected from a 0–20 cm depth at three points per plant, pooled,
  • samples were taken across the root zone and combined to form one representative sample. The rhizosphere soils
  • Following standard soil preparation procedures, samples were air-dried at ambient temperature, crushed to
  • disaggregate clods, and sieved through a 2 mm mesh to remove stones and coarse debris (Asamoah et al.,2025;
  • Carrera et al, 2025). The processed samples were stored in clean polyethylene zip-lock bags and kept in a
  • Sample digestion and heavy metal analysis
  • Heavy metals in soil and plant samples were extracted using the wet digestion method following APHA (2012)
  • and USEPA (1996) protocols. Approximately 1.0 g of the sieved sample was weighed into a digestion flask,
  • complete digestion. After cooling, each digest was filtered through Whatman No. 42 filter paper into a 50 mL
  • as the stock digest for heavy metal determination. Samples with concentrations exceeding the calibration range
  • of the Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS) were appropriately diluted (1:2, 1:5, or 1:10) with
  • AAS following the APHA (2012) standard procedure. To ensure quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC),

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
3171d062026-08-02major1 section added
bc84bfc2026-08-02major6 sections added; narrative text revised