Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

damaging effects of arsenic stress

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by10 pages
Metals measured7
Evidence tierB
Year2025

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • nanoparticles (SiO2 NPs, 200 ppm) in mitigating arsenic (As, 50 µM) toxicity in Brassica juncea. The
  • rate by 52%, leaf nitrogen content by 33%, and phenolic content by 42%. Furthermore, there was a
  • decreasing by 41% and 39%, respectively, indicating reduced oxidative damage and lipid peroxidation.
  • concentrations of up to 5 mg/kg in the Earth’s crust3 and enters ecosystems through both natural processes such
  • World Health Organization (WHO) has set a maximum permissible limit of 10 µg/L for As in drinking water3.
  • oil accounts for 40% of all agricultural commodities produced, making it one of the most abundant. Rapeseed
  • mg/L. Another study found that after applying 500 µl/L−1 mM of SiO2 NPs to cucumbers under salinity stress,
  • antioxidant activity and growth significantly enhanced22. Treatments with 40 and 60 mg/L of SiO2NPs increased
  • seed germination in tall wheat grass by up to 86.3% and 85.7%, respectively, while the control group only
  • experienced 58%. Furthermore, compared to the control, the seedling weight rose by 49%23. By boosting gaseous
  • Asanbonl, Jharkhand-832,102, India. In order to make required concentration (200 ppm) of SiO2 NPs, the stock
  • sowing. SiO2 NPs (200 ppm) was sprayed on plants when they were 25 days old. At 40 DAS, plants were collected
  • To determine the amount of malondialdehyde (MDA), 0.5 g leaf samples were homogenized in 10% trichloroacetic
  • bath before being supplemented with an equivalent amount of 0.67% 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA). Using an
  • homogenized in 10 mL of 3% aqueous sulfosalicylic acid and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 15 min. The resulting
  • visible spectrophotometer. Following a 5-mL 1% acidic methanol homogenization process, plant leaves were
  • To make the reaction mixture, add 400 µL of methanol, 100 µL of aluminum chloride (10%), 100 µL of
  • was conducted to assess significant differences among treatment means at a significance level of P < 0.05. Post
  • Arsenic (50 µM) treatment significantly reduced the SL (37%), RL (49%), SFW (41%), SDW (38%), RFW (51%),
  • and RDW (57%) over non-treated plants (Figs. 2 A-H and 3 A-B). The addition of SiO2 NPs significantly raised
  • all the above growth indices by 41% (SL), 36% (RL), 48% (SFW), 40% (RFW), 46% (SDW), and 45% (RDW).
  • Arsenic stress caused severe damage to the leaf pigment content of Brassica juncea, as evidenced by a 57%
  • resulted in increases SPAD value of chlorophyll by 43% over untreated plants. In As-stressed B. juncea, SiO2 NPs
  • PN, gs, Ci, and E significantly affected by As stress and reduced PN, gs, Ci, and E by 44%, 41%, 55%, and 48%
  • The current findings represented that solely As toxicity increased the concentration of MDA (79%) and H2O2
  • characters that, at P ≤ 0.05 (Tukey’s test), show a significant difference between the means of the different
  • clear characters that, at P ≤ 0.05 (Tukey’s test), show a significant difference between the means of the different
  • graphs show clear characters that, at P ≤ 0.05 (Tukey’s test), show a significant difference between the means of
  • In B. juncea proline level significantly changed under As-stress and increased by 21% (Fig. 5G). Supplementation
  • (27%) was recorded in the plants treated with SiO2 NPs in As-contaminated plants (Fig. 5G).
  • The TSS and TFAA significantly decreased under Cd stress by 28% and 32%, respectively over non-treated
  • and TFAA. In the presence of SiO2 NPs, B. juncea plants responded most intensely and increased TSS (37%) and
  • In our results the TPC and TFC significantly decreased by 31% and 37% respectively over non-treated plants
  • (Fig. 6 C-D). Furthermore, foliar fertigation of SiO2 NPs significantly increased these attributes by 42% (TPC)
  • and 38% (TFC) compared to non-treated plants. SiO2 NPs also reduced the As-toxicity in B. juncea plants.
  • at P ≤ 0.05 (Tukey’s test), show a significant difference between the means of the different treatments.
  • NPs significantly increased the protein content by 17% over non-treated plants. SiO2 NPs also reduce the toxicity
  • Our study demonstrated that the nutrients including N, P, and K significantly decreased by 46%, 41%, and
  • 38% over non-treated plants (Fig. 7 A-C). A significant increase in N, P, and K content was noted in the plants
  • treated with foliar application of SiO2 NPs by 33% (N), 29% (P), and 30% (K) over control ones. In As-treated
  • that SiO2 NPs decreased As content in plant tissues by 43% compared to plants treated with As alone (Fig. 7D).
  • and reducing metal-induced toxicity19–22. The application of 200 ppm of SiO2 NPs significantly alleviated the As-

Methods (brief)

  • Arsenic stress was given in the form of sodium arsenite (NaAsO2). An experiment using a randomly selected
  • sowing. SiO2 NPs (200 ppm) was sprayed on plants when they were 25 days old. At 40 DAS, plants were collected
  • weight estimation, plant samples were initially weighed for fresh weight and then oven-dried at 70 °C for 48 h
  • To determine the amount of malondialdehyde (MDA), 0.5 g leaf samples were homogenized in 10% trichloroacetic
  • was used to detect the absorbance at 390 nm and determine the samples H2O2 level.
  • are combined in a 90:8:2 ratios to form the extraction mixture. In a pestle and mortar, 1 g of fresh leaf samples
  • The amount of flavonoids in leaf samples is ascertained using the methanolic extract27. Ten milliliters of
  • equivalent per gram of sample27.
  • were determined following acid digestion. A 0.2 g portion of oven-dried plant tissue was accurately weighed
  • and subjected to digestion in 10 mL of concentrated nitric acid (HNO3) in a Teflon digestion vessel. The sample
  • was heated in a microwave digestion system until complete digestion was achieved, ensuring the complete
  • breakdown of organic matter. After digestion, the resulting solution was filtered through Whatman No. 42
  • optical emission spectrophotometer (ICP-OES; Model 7400, Thermo Jarrell Ash, USA), calibrated with standard

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised