Skip to content
Heavy Metal Index

Riparian Methylmercury Production Increases Riverine Mercury Flux

Source

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus.

Page snapshot
Cited by4 pages
Metals measured2
Evidence tierB
Year2024

Overview

This source page is a mechanical bulk-ingest record for a PDF in the research-pulls corpus. It preserves source-level identity, routeable product/analyte scope, and exact extracted numeric lines for later human or fresh-context audit. It does not derive HMTc thresholds, percentiles, or brand-by-brand comparisons.

Key numbers

The worker extracted the full PDF text with layout preservation twice and compared extraction hashes before commit. The following lines are copied from numeric/table-bearing regions of the PDF and retain the source units and wording where legible:

  • in food webs,14 with nearly 80% of all river fish consumption Published: November 8, 2024
  • anoxic conditions and the prevalence of anaerobic pro- of a large reservoir complex, identified that 29−31% of the
  • cesses.22,25 These conditions establish riparian zones as filter-passing MeHg (f.MeHg) and 38−40% of the particulate
  • riparian zone processes in the formation of MeHg is basin.48,50,51 Nearly 85% of the irrigated acreage in the entire
  • riparian zones that support a diverse range of vegetation.52 Our (0.3 μM glass fiber filters, Advantec, GF7513MM) and stored
  • of the diversions and return waters, making it difficult to inorganic sulfide (S(-II), preserved at 50% volume/volume
  • Geological Survey (USGS) Equal Width Index method (n = characterization (SUVA254, spectral slope ratio (SR)). The U.S.
  • 1−2 per site, n = 18 total).56 River flow and velocity were Geological Survey (USGS) Reston Stable Isotope Laboratory
  • the six major tributaries (n = 1−2 per tributary, n = 7 total) MeHg from total Hg concentrations (eq S1). Gravimetric
  • and 24 irrigation return drains (n = 1 per drain) that were Hg(II) and MeHg concentrations were calculated by dividing
  • pore water SO42−; n = 2 for pore water NO3−) were organic matter (DOM) specific ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm
  • 3.1. Hydrology. Surface water velocities were measured at leaving a minor unaccounted portion of 5.6% in the hydrologic
  • ranged from 0.27 to 0.72 m/s and displayed distinct hydrologic hydrology (Supporting Information, Section S3) estimated the
  • 579.2) exhibited fluctuating velocity with a peak of 0.72 m/s, accounting (99.7−101%) of the hydrologic budget along the
  • and Section 3 (km 571.7−556.5) showed a notable decrease in Snake River. This full accounting of the Snake River hydrologic
  • transect. Although the median Cl− concentrations in the main account for 88.0% of the total DOC load through the reach of
  • 24.7 mg/L, respectively) were not statistically different (p- contribute 7.3% of the total load based on measured DOC
  • were of lower Cl− concentration thus diluting Cl− in the main 4.7% of the DOC load was not attributed to the surface water
  • (2.86 mg NO3− (as N)/L) marginally higher, though not main stem surface waters (109 vs 24.6 mg/L, respectively; p-
  • significant in either case (Figure S4B). Median concentrations value < 0.001; Figure S9A), which supports the hypothesis that
  • mg/L, respectively) were marginally higher, though not and loads.48 POC concentrations followed a similar increasing
  • significant, than the main stem Snake River (47.6 mg/L) trend (2.1-fold increase) along the reach of the synoptic survey
  • The measured loads of Cl−, SO42−, and NO3− decreased in tributaries and irrigation drains (1.51 vs 1.95 mg/L,
  • Similarly, the cumulative instream loads, which only account waters (0.80 mg/L; Figure S9B). Our load analysis of the
  • 86.7%, 73.4%, and 67.0% of the Cl−, SO42−, and NO3− across and POC across the study reach. Only 67.3% of the estimated
  • inorganic anions from irrigation drains were assessed using an (main stem Snake River and tributaries, 38.7%) and irrigation
  • estimate of irrigation drain discharge along this stretch of the drains (28.6%), with 32.7% of the load unaccounted (Figure
  • Snake River (13.7 ± 1.4 m3/s)48 and the average measured S10A). For POC, 64.7% could be accounted for (53.5% from
  • the total Cl− load, 15.2% of the total SO42− load, and 20.5% of particulate loads are strongly associated with the dynamics of
  • agricultural drains, we can account for 94.3%, 88.6%, and Snake River, as fluctuations in measured loads coincided with
  • 87.4% of the increases in loads of Cl−, SO42−, and NO3−, changes in river velocity (Figures S2A and S10). In summary,
  • riparian pore waters, tributaries, and irrigation drains, and spatially in We observed only 10.8% unaccounted load in the f.Hg(II),
  • (B) main stem surface waters (blue), (C) riparian pore waters (solid with 75.6% attributed to the upgradient Snake River and
  • red), and (D) riparian sediments (brown) over 164 km of the Snake tributaries and 13.6% to the irrigation drains (Figure S14A).
  • The unaccounted portion of f.Hg(II) (10.8%), though
  • 3B). Concentrations of p.MeHg increased dramatically from unaccounted load at 28.5%, with 47.5% of the total load
  • the initial upgradient to final downgradient sampling locations, attributed to the upgradient Snake River and 28.9% attributed
  • to the irrigation drains (Figure S14B). In summary, load surface waters. For the total MeHg load, 57.9% was from the
  • comparisons confirm that hydrologic inputs and particle upgradient Snake River and major tributaries and 7.9% was
  • behavior govern filter-passing and particulate Hg(II) in the from the irrigation drains, with 34.2% unaccounted for (1.65
  • fractions, the analysis of f.MeHg identified 52.4% load for MeHg Formation. The chemistry of the pore waters
  • only 3.1% contributions from the irrigation drains, leaving by a degree of suboxic conditions, sediment chemicals

Methods (brief)

  • Figure 1. Map of Snake River synoptic survey conducted in July 2022; markers indicate locations of sample collection of main stem surface and
  • absorbance at 254 nm (SUVA254).34 DOM plays a crucial role were collected along the reach of the Snake River to assess if
  • nutrients and suspended solids.48,50,51 The irrigated landscape metal samples were also collected. Particulate organic carbon
  • and main stem of the Snake River are separated by narrow (POC) and particulate nitrogen (PN) samples were filtered
  • a comprehensive understanding of the intricate dynamics At each of the 16 main stem sites, pore water was collected
  • 2.2. Sample Collection & Processing. Complete details cores (6.25 cm diameter core barrel, 7−20 cm depth) were
  • for sample collection and processing are provided in the collected at each of the 16 main stem sampling locations, and
  • when Hg(II) methylation is expected to be relatively high surrogate for organic matter content). Biota samples, collected
  • reflects similar riverine characteristics to that of the inflowing 2.3. Sample Analyses. Complete details on sample
  • summer months has been observed in many other riverine (Supporting Information, Section S1.2). In brief, water samples
  • systems.54,55 The main stem of the Snake River was sampled at were analyzed in the Poulin Lab at the University of California,
  • main stem sampling sites, surface water was collected from particulate metals (Fe, Mn), inorganic anions (Cl−, NO3−,
  • Current Profiler. Average discharge measurements at each collected glass fiber filters. The USGS Mercury Research
  • Q-Rev software.57 A multiparameter sonde (Aqua TROLL ments (total Hg and MeHg) on the water samples (filter-
  • (DO), and temperature concurrent with discrete sample content. Inorganic divalent Hg (Hg(II)) concentrations, both
  • collection. Surface water samples were also collected from filter-passing and particulate, were calculated by subtracting
  • actively discharging into the Snake River at the time of sample their volumetric counterpart concentrations by TSS. Biota
  • samples were collected in 2 L polyethylene terephthalate glycol (Corvallis, OR). A comparison of field replicates is provided in

Implications

This page makes the source discoverable for category-level evidence routing. Values remain source-native and should be used only with the stated matrix, species, basis, geography, and censoring context from the paper. The page does not convert total mercury to methylmercury or use total arsenic as inorganic arsenic.

Wiki pages this source may touch

Verification notes

  • Identity check: DOI, raw handle, candidate cite-key, and SHA-256 were compared against existing wiki/sources/ pages before creation.
  • Full-PDF read: pdftotext -layout was run on the full PDF twice; extracted text hashes matched before the page was written.
  • Numeric verification: numeric/table-bearing lines were selected mechanically from the verified extraction and preserved without unit conversion or rounding.
  • Brand firewall: the worker skips PDFs when extracted numeric lines appear brand/manufacturer-sensitive; this page contains category-level or species-level evidence only.
  • HMTc firewall: no threshold, percentile, pass/fail, clean/dirty, or certification math is stated.

Update history

The five most recent substantive edits to this page, classified major (evidence or structure moved), correction (a published value or statement was wrong and has been fixed), or minor (narrative rewritten without changing the underlying evidence). Each description is derived from what the edit did to this page; the linked commit is the authoritative record, routine regeneration passes are excluded, and the full version history lives in git. When DOI minting comes online (see schema docs), each entry below will also link to a version-pinned DataCite DOI.

CommitDateChangeDescription
b01ec52c2026-08-04major2 sections added
d49e450f2026-08-03major5 sections added; narrative text revised